1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{graphics}
4: \usepackage{psfig}
5: \usepackage{ulem}
6: \usepackage{longtable}
7:
8: \def\sn{{SN~1979C}}
9: \def\E{{\sl Einstein}}
10: \def\R{{\sl ROSAT}}
11: \def\A{{\sl ASCA}}
12: \def\C{{\sl Chandra}}
13: \def\B{{\sl BeppoSAX}}
14: \def\X{{\sl XMM-Newton}}
15: \def\H{{\sl HST}}
16: \def\V{{\sl VLA}}
17: \def\VLBI{{\sl VLBI}}
18: \newcommand\hii{H{\small II}}
19: \newcommand\hi{H{\small I}}
20: \def\cor{\widehat=}
21: \def\gs{\mathrel{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil
22: $\displaystyle##$\hfil\cr>\cr\sim\cr}}}
23: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\textstyle##$\hfil\cr
24: >\cr\sim\cr}}}
25: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
26: >\cr\sim\cr}}}
27: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptscriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
28: >\cr\sim\cr}}}}}
29: \def\ls{\mathrel{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil
30: $\displaystyle##$\hfil\cr<\cr\sim\cr}}}
31: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\textstyle##$\hfil\cr
32: <\cr\sim\cr}}}
33: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
34: <\cr\sim\cr}}}
35: {\vcenter{\offinterlineskip\halign{\hfil$\scriptscriptstyle##$\hfil\cr
36: <\cr\sim\cr}}}}}
37:
38: \addtolength{\topmargin}{0cm}
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: \title{Late-time X-Ray, UV and Optical Monitoring of Supernova 1979C}
43:
44: \author{Stefan~Immler\altaffilmark{1},
45: Robert A. Fesen\altaffilmark{2},
46: Schuyler D. Van Dyk\altaffilmark{3},
47: Kurt W. Weiler\altaffilmark{4},
48: Robert Petre\altaffilmark{1},
49: Walter H. G. Lewin\altaffilmark{5},
50: David Pooley\altaffilmark{6},
51: Wolfgang Pietsch\altaffilmark{7},
52: Bernd Aschenbach\altaffilmark{7},
53: Molly C. Hammell\altaffilmark{2} and
54: Gwen C. Rudie\altaffilmark{2}
55: }
56:
57: \altaffiltext{1}{Exploration of the Universe Division,
58: X-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, Code 662,
59: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
60: \email{immler@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov}
61: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
62: 6127 Wilder Laboratory, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA}
63: \altaffiltext{3}{Spitzer Science Center/Caltech, 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}
64: \altaffiltext{4}{Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7213, Washington,
65: DC 20375-5320, USA}
66: \altaffiltext{5}{Center for Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of
67: Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA}
68: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
69: 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA}
70: \altaffiltext{7}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
71: PO Box 1312, 85741 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany}
72:
73: \shorttitle{{X-Ray, UV and Optical Monitoring of SN~1979C}}
74: \shortauthors{Immler et~al.}
75:
76: \begin{abstract}
77:
78: We present results from observations of \sn\ with \X\ in X-rays and in the UV,
79: archival X-ray and \H\ data, and follow-up ground-based optical imaging.
80: The \X\ MOS spectrum shows best-fit two-temperature thermal
81: plasma emission characteristics of both the forward
82: ($kT_{\rm high}=4.1^{+76}_{-2.3}$~keV) and reverse shock
83: ($kT_{\rm low}=0.78^{+0.25}_{-0.17}$~keV) with no intrinsic absorption.
84: The long-term X-ray lightcurve, constructed from all X-ray data
85: available, reveals that \sn\ is still radiating at a flux level similar
86: to that detected by \R\ in 1995, showing no sign of a decline over the
87: last six years, some 16--23~yrs after its outburst. The high inferred
88: X-ray luminosity ($L_{0.3-2}=8\times10^{38}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$) is caused
89: by the interaction of the SN shock with dense circumstellar matter,
90: likely deposited by a strong stellar wind from the progenitor with a high
91: mass-loss rate of
92: $\dot{M} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$.
93: The X-ray data support a strongly decelerated shock, and show
94: a mass-loss rate history which is consistent with a constant progenitor
95: mass-loss rate and wind velocity over the past $\gs16,000$~yrs
96: in the stellar evolution of the progenitor.
97: We find a best-fit CSM density profile of $\rho_{\rm CSM} \propto r^{-s}$
98: with index $s \ls 1.7$ and high CSM densities
99: ($\gs 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$) out to large radii from the site of the explosion
100: ($r \gs 4 \times 10^{17}~{\rm cm}$).
101: Using \X\ Optical Monitor data we further detect a point-like optical/UV
102: source consistent with the position of \sn, with $B, U$, and $UVW1$-band
103: luminosities of $5, 7$, and $9 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$, respectively.
104: The young stellar cluster in the vicinity of the SN, as imaged by the \H\
105: and follow-up ground-based optical imaging, can only provide a fraction
106: of the total observed flux, so that a significant contribution to the output
107: likely arises from the strong interaction of \sn\ with dense CSM.
108:
109: \end{abstract}
110:
111: \keywords{stars: supernovae: individual (SN 1979C) --- stars: circumstellar matter ---
112: galaxies: individual (M100, NGC 4321) --- X-rays: general --- X-rays: individual
113: (SN 1979C, M100, NGC 4321) --- X-rays: ISM --- ultraviolet: ISM}
114:
115: \section{Introduction}
116: \label{introduction}
117:
118: The interaction of the outgoing supernova (SN) shock and ejecta with the
119: circumstellar medium (CSM) can produce substantial amounts of X-ray emission.
120: The dominant X-ray production mechanism is the interaction of the SN
121: shock with the ambient CSM deposited either by a pre-SN stellar wind or
122: non-conservative mass transfer to a companion. This interaction produces hot
123: gas with a characteristic temperature in the range $T \sim 10^7$--$10^9$~K
124: (Chevalier \& Fransson 1994). Gas heated to such a high temperature produces
125: radiation predominantly in the X-ray range. X-ray emission from this interaction
126: is expected for all Type Ib/c and II SNe with substantial CSM established by
127: the massive progenitors. The details of the CSM interaction are discussed in
128: Fransson, Lundqvist \& Chevalier \cite{flc96} and references therein, while the
129: X-ray interaction luminosity is briefly summarized here (see also
130: Immler \& Lewin 2003): the thermal X-ray luminosity, $L_{\rm x}$,
131: produced by the shock heated CSM, can be expressed as
132: $L_{\rm x} = 4/(\pi m^2) \Lambda(T) \times (\dot{M}/v_{\rm w})^2\times(v_{\rm s} t)^{-1}$, where $m$ is the mean mass per particle ($2.1\times10^{-27}$~kg for a H+He
133: plasma), $\Lambda(T)$ the cooling function of the heated plasma at temperature
134: $T$, $\dot{M}$ the mass-loss rate of the progenitor, $v_{\rm w}$ the speed
135: of the stellar wind blown off by the progenitor, and $v_{\rm s}$ the
136: speed of the outgoing shock. If X-ray spectroscopic data are available,
137: $\Lambda(T)$ is known, and the interaction luminosity $L_{\rm x}$ at
138: time $t$ after the outburst can be used to measure the ratio
139: $\dot{M}/v_{\rm w}$. Assuming a constant SN shock velocity
140: $v_{\rm s}$, the shock will reach a radius of $r=v_{\rm s}t$
141: from the site of the explosion at time $t$ after the explosion.
142:
143: If the CSM density $\rho_{\rm csm}$ is dominated by a wind from the
144: progenitor of the SN, the continuity equation requires
145: $\dot{M} = 4\pi r^2 \rho_{\rm w}(r) \times v_{\rm w}(r)$ through a sphere
146: of radius $r$, where $\rho_{\rm w}$ is the stellar wind density.
147: After the SN shock plows through the CSM, its density is
148: $\rho_{\rm csm} = 4\rho_{\rm w}$ (Fransson, Lundqvist \& Chevalier 1996),
149: assuming no losses to cosmic ray acceleration.
150:
151: Since each X-ray measurement at time $t$ is related to the corresponding
152: distance $r$ from the site of the explosion, which has been reached
153: by the wind at a time depending on $v_{\rm w}$, or the age of the wind
154: $t_{\rm w} = t v_{\rm s}/v_{\rm w}$, we can use our measurements as a
155: `time machine' to probe the progenitor's history over significant time scales.
156: Assuming that $v_{\rm w}$ and $v_{\rm s}$ did not change over $t_{\rm w}$,
157: or in cases where the shock front deceleration is known from radio data,
158: we can even directly measure the mass loss rate back in time.
159: Furthermore, integration of the mass-loss rate along the path of the
160: expanding shell gives the mean density inside a sphere of radius $r$.
161: For a constant wind velocity $v_{\rm w}$ and constant mass-loss rate $\dot{M}$,
162: a $\rho_{\rm csm} = \rho_0 (r/r_0)^{-s}$ profile with $s=2$ is expected.
163:
164: After the expanding shell has become optically thin, it is expected that
165: emission from the SN ejecta itself, heated by the reverse shock, dominates
166: the X-ray output of the interaction regions due to its higher emission
167: measure and higher density. Since the plasma temperature of the ejecta
168: is lower than that of the shocked CSM, a significant `softening'
169: of the X-ray spectrum is expected (e.g., Chevalier \& Fransson 1994;
170: Fransson, Lundqvist \& Chevalier 1996).
171:
172: The number of detected X-ray SNe has substantially grown over the past
173: few years. With 22 detections to date\footnote{A complete list of
174: X-ray SNe and references are available at
175: http://lheawww.gsfc.nasa.gov/users/immler/supernovae\_list.html}
176: and high-quality X-ray spectra available from \X\ and \C\ observations,
177: a wealth of new information has been gathered (see Immler \& Lewin 2003
178: for a review article).
179:
180: The signatures of circumstellar interaction in the radio, optical, and
181: X-ray regimes have been found for a number of core-collapse SNe, such
182: as the Type II-L \sn\ (e.g., Weiler et~al.\ 1986, 1991; Fesen \& Matonick
183: 1993; Immler et~al.\ 1998).
184: \sn\ was discovered in the optical near maximum light on April 19, 1979
185: (Johnson 1979), and detected in X-rays 16~yrs after its outburst
186: with the \R\ HRI, with a luminosity of
187: $L_{\rm 0.1-2.4}=1.3\times10^{39}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$ (Immler et~al.\ 1998).
188: The \R\ data imply a mass-loss rate of
189: $\dot{M}\sim1\times10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$,
190: similar to the mass-loss rates of other massive ($\gs 10M_{\odot}$)
191: SN progenitors (e.g. SNe 1978K, 1986J, 1988Z, and 1998S)
192: and in agreement with the mass-loss rate inferred from \V\
193: radio observations
194: ($\dot{M}=1.2\times10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~[v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1}]$;
195: Weiler et~al.\ 1991).
196: Earlier \E\ observations only gave an upper limit to the X-ray
197: luminosity on days 64, 239, and 454 after the outburst, with $3\sigma$
198: upper limits of $1.8 \times 10^{40}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$,
199: $7.6 \times 10^{39}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$ and
200: $6.9 \times 10^{39}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$, respectively
201: (Immler et~al.\ 1998).
202: Since the \R\ HRI instrument does not provide energy information, and subsequent
203: \A\ and \C\ observations (Kaaret 2001; Ray, Petre \& Schlegel 2001) lacked
204: enough photon statistics for X-ray spectroscopy, there is no information
205: about the X-ray spectral properties of \sn\ and thus the temperatures of the
206: forward and reverse shock.
207:
208: \sn\ was extensively monitored in the radio starting eight days after
209: maximum light, and showed an initial rate of decline of $t^{-0.7}$
210: (Weiler et~al.\ 1986, 2001), followed by a flattening or possibly brightening
211: at an age of $\approx 10$~yrs, while maintaining a relatively
212: constant spectral index (Montes et~al.\ 2000; Weiler et~al.\ 2001).
213: The results were interpreted as being due to a denser region in the CSM
214: or a complex CSM structure which might have been modulated by the stellar
215: wind of the progenitor's companion (Weiler et~al.\ 1992).
216:
217: There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the expansion
218: velocity of the ejecta. While Bartel \& Bietenholz \cite{bartel03} find a
219: near-free expansion (i.~e., $E(T,V)=[{\rm const.}]$)
220: based on \VLBI\ data from $t=3.7$--$22~{\rm yrs}$
221: after the explosion, Marcaide et~al.\ \cite{marcaide02} report the
222: detection of a strongly decelerated expansion. There is consensus,
223: however, that the initial expansion of the shock over the first
224: $6\pm2$~yrs was free, with $v_{\rm s} \approx 9,000~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$
225: (see Marcaide et~al.\ 2002 and references therein). The claimed onset
226: of the deceleration to $v_{\rm s} \approx 6,200~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$
227: coincides with the flattening of the radio lightcurve and might be
228: indicative for the shock running into a dense CSM (Marcaide et~al.\ 2002).
229:
230: Low-dispersion Keck optical spectra obtained at $t=14.8$~yrs and 17~yrs,
231: as well as \H\ UV spectra 17~yrs after the outburst revealed broad
232: $\approx$ 6,000~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ emission lines, as well as blueward
233: peaks which are substantially stronger than those toward the red,
234: indicating internal dust extinction within the expanding ejecta.
235: Profile differences between hydrogen and oxygen line emission
236: suggest two or more separate emitting regions, such as a H$\alpha$
237: bright shell and oxygen inner ejecta region (Fesen et~al.\ 1999).
238:
239: \H\ imaging of the \sn\ environment showed the presence of a cluster
240: of stars in the vicinity of \sn, containing both young
241: ($\approx 4$--$8$~Myrs) blue stars, as well as older red supergiants
242: ($\approx 20$~Myrs), and succeeded in identifying \sn\ as the brightest
243: source in the optical and UV in that cluster
244: (van Dyk et~al.\ 1999). The data were further used to estimate the
245: mass of the progenitor to be $18\pm3~M_{\odot}$, in
246: agreement with a mass-estimate derived from radio data
247: ($\gs 13~M_{\odot}$, Weiler et~al.\ 1991).
248:
249: In this paper we report on \X\ X-ray and UV observations of \sn,
250: all archival X-ray data available, as well as archival \H\ images
251: and new ground-based optical data. In \S \ref{data}
252: we describe the data and analysis thereof and report on the
253: X-ray spectrum, multi-mission X-ray lightcurve, UV photometry,
254: and new follow-up ground-based optical imaging in \S \ref{results}.
255: We discuss the results in the context of the CSM
256: interaction model and compare them to other core-collapse SNe in
257: \S \ref{discussion}, followed by a brief summary in \S \ref{summary}.
258:
259: \section{Data Processing and Analysis}
260: \label{data}
261: SN~1979C and its host galaxy NGC~4321 (M100) were observed with \X\ as
262: part of a GTO program on December 28, 2001, with the EPIC PN instrument
263: for 31.6~ks, and the EPIC MOS1 and MOS2 instruments for 36.2~ks
264: and 36.0~ks, respectively, using the medium filter.
265: Data processing and analysis were performed with SAS~6.1 and the latest
266: calibration constituents, as well as FTOOLS and own IDL routines.
267: Spectral fitting was performed using XSPEC 11.3.1.
268:
269: In order to establish the long-term X-ray lightcurve of \sn\ we further
270: extracted and reduced all X-ray data available in the archives
271: (see \S \ref{other}). \X\ Optical Monitor data of SNe 1979C
272: (\S \ref{optical_monitor}), as well as archival \H\ and recent MDM
273: observations (\S \ref{mdm}) were further used to estimate optical/UV fluxes.
274:
275: \subsection{{\sl XMM-Newton} EPIC Data}
276: \label{epic}
277:
278: Screening of the PN and MOS data for periods with a high
279: background revealed contamination of the data at the end
280: of the observation period. Exclusion of these flaring periods gave
281: cleaned exposure times of 27.1~ks (PN) and 23.6~ks (MOS).
282:
283: Inspection of the EPIC images further showed that the position of
284: \sn\ coincides with a chip gap on the PN detector, making a
285: reliable count rate estimate impossible. The PN data were therefore
286: not used in the analysis and we will restrict ourselves to the
287: EPIC MOS data only. The MOS data were further screened using the
288: parameters ``FLAG=0'' and ``PATTERN $<$= 12'' and filtered to retain
289: the 0.3--10~keV energy band only in order to avoid contamination from
290: soft-proton flaring and uncertainties in the calibration at low energies.
291: The merged 0.3--10~keV band MOS1+MOS2 image of M100/SN~1979C is
292: shown in the left-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{image}.
293: MOS counts were extracted within a circle of radius $30''$ centered
294: on the radio position of \sn\ and corrected for the energy-enclosed
295: aperture. The background was estimated locally from a source-free annulus
296: with inner and outer radii of $45''$ and $55''$, respectively, to account
297: for residual diffuse emission from the host galaxy.
298:
299: \subsection{{\sl XMM-Newton} Optical Monitor Data}
300: \label{optical_monitor}
301:
302: Optical Monitor (OM) data were obtained in 16 individual exposures
303: in the $B$-band (effective wavelength 4,340~\AA), $U$-band (3,440~\AA),
304: and $UVW1$-band (2,910~\AA), with on-source exposure times of 2.0~ks
305: ($B$), 1.8~ks ($U$), and 1.9~ks ($UVW1$). OM data were reprocessed using
306: the SAS ``omichain'' task, and following the data analysis threads in the
307: ABC Guide version 2.01\footnote{available from
308: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xmm/abc/}.
309:
310: For imaging and source detection, the tracking history was created,
311: bad pixels were removed, a flat field generated, and images were
312: corrected for ``modulo-8'' spatial fixed-pattern noise. Source detection
313: was performed using the ``omdetect'' task, which employs a two-stage
314: process to locate sources in OM Science Window images, i.e., determination
315: of the background and consecutive island search (``box detect'') in which
316: sets of pixels above the sigma significance cut-off are identified and grouped
317: into individual objects.
318: Source counts were converted into instrument-bandpass magnitudes utilizing
319: the ``ommag'' command. Fluxes were converted from count rates using a
320: step-by-step recipe provided by Alice Breeveld\footnote{available from
321: http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/sas/documentation/watchout/uvflux.shtml}.
322: We also employed the interactive ``omsource'' task with various aperture
323: sizes to verify the magnitudes obtained with ``omichain'' and to check
324: for potential contamination of the OM photometry with nearby sources.
325:
326: Comparison of the optical positions of six stars from the Guide Star
327: Catalog with the centroid positions of the stars in the $B$, $U$, and
328: $UVW1$ images revealed an offset of individual OM images of
329: $\Delta{\rm R.A.}=0\farcs14$ and $\Delta{\rm Dec.}=-0\farcs95$ ($B$),
330: $\Delta{\rm R.A.}=0\farcs43$ and $\Delta{\rm Dec.}=-1\farcs75$ ($U$), and
331: $\Delta{\rm R.A.}=1\farcs01$ and $\Delta{\rm Dec.}=-2\farcs23$ ($UVW1$).
332: This offset was also visible in an overlay of the $B$, $U$, and $UVW1$ images.
333: After re-alignment of the images with shifts in R.A. and Dec. as quoted above,
334: no systematic offset between the different images, and no statistically
335: significant offset between the centroid positions of the stars with the
336: Guide Star Catalog positions are observed.
337:
338: A three-color ($B$, $U$, $UVW1$) image of M100 and SN~1979C is shown in the
339: right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{image}.
340: The circular enhancement in the south-western spiral arm of M100,
341: most prominent in the $B$-band image (color-coded in red), is due to stray-light
342: from the bright nucleus of M100. Due to its large offset from the position
343: of \sn\ and local background extraction, however, it does not affect the
344: \sn\ photometry. An \X\ OM $U$-band image of the region around the position
345: of \sn\ is further shown in more detail in Fig.~\ref{spiral} (upper panel).
346:
347: \subsection{Other X-Ray Data}
348: \label{other}
349: In addition to the \X\ data described above, we used archival data from
350: \E\ (HRI), \R\ (HRI and PSPC), \A\ (SIS), and a recent \C\ (ACIS-S)
351: observation. All \E\ observations were merged into a single 41.2~ks
352: observation to increase the photon statistics.
353: Count rates from the archival \E\ HRI and \R\ HRI observations
354: were taken from Immler et~al.\ \cite{immler98},
355: \C\ count rates were taken from Ray, Petre \& Schlegel \cite{ray01}
356: and Kaaret \cite{kaaret01}, and \A\ upper limits from Ray, Petre \& Schlegel
357: \cite{ray01}.
358: We further extracted source counts for each of these observations following
359: standard analysis methods as described in the respective instrument
360: handbooks using FTOOLS to check and reproduce published count rates.
361: Two previously unpublished \R\ HRI observations were analyzed as described
362: in Immler et~al.\ \cite{immler98}.
363:
364: A \R\ PSPC observation from December 8, 1998, was also used to establish the
365: long-term X-ray lightcurve of \sn. This observation was selected
366: as part of the \R\ PSPC ``last-light'' campaign during which
367: the PSPC instrument was re-activated for a final set of observations
368: just days before \R\ was decommissioned. Inspection of the PSPC data showed
369: that the position of \sn\ was sufficiently offset from the ``gain hole'' which
370: emerged on the PSPC-B detector images taken during the short ``last-light'' campaign.
371: Exposure corrected counts were extracted from the position of \sn\
372: within a circle of radius $30''$ and corrected for the 100\% encircled
373: energy radius. The background was estimated locally within an annulus
374: of inner and outer radii of $1'$ and $1\farcm3$. The net exposure time
375: of the observation is 7.8~ks. A log of all X-ray observations utilized
376: in this paper is given in Table~\ref{tab1}.
377:
378: \subsection{Follow-up Ground-based Optical Imaging}
379: \label{mdm}
380:
381: H$\alpha$ and $R$(Harris)-band images were obtained at the MDM Observatory
382: on December 19 and 20, 2004 (epoch = 2004.97 $\simeq$ 2005.0), using the
383: Hiltner 2.4~m telescope and the Columbia 8K CCD camera (Crotts 2001).
384: The images were used to investigate further the nature of the source detected
385: at the \sn\ site, and to compare more directly its current optical flux level
386: with that seen in previous late-time optical detections (Fesen et al. 1999;
387: van Dyk et al.\ 1999),
388: Two 1,000~s $R$-band and three 1,000~s H$\alpha$ exposures binned $2 \times 2$
389: yielding an image scale of 0.404 arcsec/pixel were taken under poor to fair
390: conditions. The H$\alpha$ image had poor image quality ($3''$ FWHM) while
391: the $R$-band images were fair to good ($1\farcs2$--$1\farcs4$ FWHM).
392: These data were reduced, co-added and cosmic ray corrected using standard
393: IRAF software routines. The MDM $R$-band image of the region around the
394: position of \sn\ is shown in Fig.~\ref{spiral} (lower panel).
395:
396: As a means for comparison of current optical flux levels, we also retrieved and
397: reprocessed the archival {\sl HST} WFPC-PC1 images of the \sn\ region
398: (c.f. van Dyk et al.\ 1999). These data consist of several filter images taken
399: July 29, 1996, using the WFPC2 camera with the \sn\ site centered in the high
400: resolution Planetary Camera (PC1; 0.046 arcsec/pixel).
401: Two 500~s broad-band red (F675W), three 1,300~s H$\alpha$ (F658N),
402: two 1,200~s $B$-band (F439W), and two 1,300~s $U$-band (F336W) filter images
403: were co-added and cosmic rays removed via high pixel value rejection procedure.
404: A few obvious residual cosmic ray contaminated pixels on the summed F675W image
405: were also removed manually using the IRAF software package ``tv.imedit''.
406: All optical/UV observations utilized in this paper are listed in Table~\ref{tab2}.
407:
408: \section{Results}
409: \label{results}
410:
411: \subsection{X-Ray Data}
412: \label{results_xmm}
413:
414: \sn\ is detected in the MOS images with a count rate of
415: ($3.6\pm0.5) \times 10^{-3}~{\rm cts~s}^{-1}$, 23~yrs after its outburst.
416: Simultaneous spectral fitting of the MOS data in the 0.5--8~keV band
417: gives a best-fit (reduced $\chi^2_{\rm r} = 0.65$ for 18 degrees of freedom)
418: two-temperature plasma emission model (XSPEC model `MEKAL') with
419: $kT_{\rm low}=0.77^{+0.17}_{-0.19}$~keV and
420: $kT_{\rm high}=2.31^{+1.95}_{-0.66}$~keV, and a best-fit absorbing column
421: density of $N_{\rm H} = 2.53^{+4.96}_{-2.53} \times 10^{20}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$
422: consistent with the Galactic foreground column density
423: ($N_{\rm H} = 2.39 \times 10^{20}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$; Dickey \& Lockman 1990).
424: Element abundances cannot be constrained due to the low photon statistics.
425: In order to avoid contamination of the spectra with unresolved and hard
426: XRBs within the disk of M100, we further fitted the spectrum in the
427: 0.5--2~keV band, where the bulk of emission from the reverse shock is
428: expected. A best-fit two-temperature thermal plasma emission model
429: ($\chi^2_{\rm r} = 0.61$, ${\rm d.o.f}=8$) gives
430: $kT_{\rm low}=0.78^{+0.25}_{-0.17}$~keV and
431: $kT_{\rm high}=4.1^{+76}_{-2.3}$~keV, and an absorbing column
432: density of $N_{\rm H} = 0$--$1.01 \times 10^{21}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$.
433: Adopting this spectral template gives 0.3--2~keV and 2--8~keV
434: fluxes of $f_{0.3-2}=2.31 \times 10^{-14}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$ and
435: $f_{2-8}=1.81 \times 10^{-14}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$, respectively.
436: The soft component contributes 64\% to the total emission, while the
437: hard component accounts for the remaining 36\% of the 0.3--2~keV band flux.
438: The MOS spectra and best-fit model are shown in Fig.~\ref{spectrum}.
439:
440: A single component thermal plasma spectrum gives best-fit
441: $kT=0.60^{+0.12}_{-0.19}$~keV and an absorbing column density of
442: $N_{\rm H} = 6.5^{+2.0}_{-1.9} \times 10^{21}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$
443: ($\chi^2_{\rm r} = 1.29$, ${\rm d.o.f}=11$).
444: Using these spectral properties gives a soft-band flux of
445: $f_{0.3-2}=1.69 \times 10^{-14}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$.
446: A thermal bremsstrahlung spectrum with $kT=0.53^{+1.40}_{-0.33}$~keV
447: ($\chi^2_{\rm r} = 0.91$, ${\rm d.o.f}=11$) cannot be statistically ruled out,
448: but shows significantly larger systematical offsets from the observed
449: spectrum, especially at lower energies.
450: Adopting this spectral template gives a soft-band flux of
451: $f_{0.3-2}=2.11 \times 10^{-14}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$.
452: Other spectral models, such as a power-law ($\Gamma=4.48^{+0.53}_{-0.48}$;
453: $\chi^2_{\rm r} = 0.87$, ${\rm d.o.f}=17$) or a non-equilibrium ionization model
454: ($kT=73.4^{+6.5}_{-33.0}$~keV; $\chi^2_{\rm r} = 0.93$, ${\rm d.o.f}=16$)
455: cannot be statistically ruled, but give unreasonable physical parameters.
456:
457: Using the above two-temperature thermal plasma spectral template and assuming
458: a distance of $17.1$~Mpc (Freedman et~al.\ 1994), we infer soft- and
459: hard-band X-ray luminosities of
460: $L_{0.3-2}=8 \times 10^{38}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$ and
461: $L_{2-10}=3 \times 10^{38}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$, respectively.
462:
463: We also analyzed the multi-mission data set to construct the long-term
464: X-ray lightcurve of \sn, using the same spectral template to convert
465: count rates into fluxes and luminosities.
466: The long-term X-ray lightcurve is shown in Fig.~\ref{lightcurve}.
467: We calculated the mass-loss rate of the progenitor as a function
468: of age of the stellar wind assuming a constant shock velocity of
469: 9,200~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ (Marcaide et~al.\ 2002).
470: An effective (0.3--2~keV band) cooling function of
471: $\Lambda = 3 \times 10^{-23}~{\rm ergs~cm}^3~{\rm s}^{-1}$ for an optically
472: thin thermal plasma with a temperature of $10^7$~K was adopted, which
473: corresponds to the temperature inferred from the MOS spectra.
474: Adopting different plasma temperatures in the range 0.5--1~keV
475: would lead to changes in the emission measure of $\approx 10\%$.
476: This error in the emission measure is included in calculations of
477: the CSM number densities (\S~\ref{xray-data}).
478: Key physical properties of \sn\ are listed in Table~\ref{tab3}.
479:
480: While the mass-loss rate history (see Table~\ref{tab3} and left-hand panel
481: of Fig.~\ref{massloss})
482: indicates a slight increase in the mass-loss rate toward a larger stellar
483: wind age, the results are not statistically significant.
484: We further calculated the mass-loss rate history assuming a
485: strongly decelerated expansion of the shock of
486: 9,200~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for a stellar wind age of $t_{\rm w}<6~{\rm yrs}$,
487: 6,200~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for $6~{\rm yrs}<t_{\rm w}<14~{\rm yrs}$, and
488: 5,400~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for $t_{\rm w}>20~{\rm yrs}$,
489: corresponding to a deceleration $R \propto t^m$ with a deceleration
490: parameter of $m=0.6$ (Marcaide et~al.\ 2002) to approximate a continually
491: decelerating shock. The results are shown in the right-hand panel of
492: Fig.~\ref{massloss}. The introduction of a deceleration leads to a
493: constant mass-loss rate of
494: $\dot{M}\approx 1.5 \times 10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$.
495:
496: We computed the CSM number density in the vicinity of the SN
497: by integrating the mass-loss rate within the sphere probed by the
498: CSM interaction. The post-shock CSM number densities, $n = \rho_{\rm csm}/m$,
499: for the different radii $r=v_{\rm s}t$ corresponding to the dates of the
500: observations, are listed in Table~\ref{tab3}.
501: An overall decrease in the CSM density is observed from
502: $n=(1.17\pm0.32) \times 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$ at log\,$r[{\rm cm}]=17.50$ (\R\ HRI) to
503: $n=(0.85\pm0.19) \times 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$ at log\,$r[{\rm cm}]=17.59$ (\X), albeit not
504: statistically significant. While the \R\ PSPC and \C\ data at log\,$r[{\rm cm}]=17.52$
505: ($n=[1.66\pm0.63] \times 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$) and $17.53$~cm
506: ($n=[1.51\pm0.56] \times 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$) are slightly higher, they are
507: consistent with the earlier \R\ HRI and later \X\ data within the errors.
508: The CSM density profile will be discussed in more detail in \S\ \ref{xray-data}.
509:
510: \subsection{{\sl XMM-Newton} Optical Monitor Data}
511:
512: An optical/UV source is found at the position of \sn\
513: in the $B$, $U$, and $UVW1$ bands, with magnitudes of
514: $m_{\rm B}=(19.1 \pm 0.1)$~mag,
515: $m_{\rm U}=(18.0 \pm 0.1)$~mag, and
516: $m_{\rm UVW1}=(17.6 \pm 0.1)$~mag, and source detection significances
517: of $17.1\sigma$, $28.1\sigma$, and $34.5\sigma$, respectively,
518: within an aperture of $12$~pix ($4\farcs1$~FWHM). The source is
519: flagged as point-like by the source detection algorithm.
520: Magnitudes were converted into fluxes with Vega as a reference
521: (Vega has magnitudes of $m_{\rm B}=0.030$~mag, and
522: $m_{\rm U}=m_{\rm UVW1}=0.035$~mag), and a relation of
523: $m_{\rm Vega} - m_{\rm SN1979C} = -2.5~{\rm log}~(f_{\rm Vega}/f_{\rm SN1979C})$,
524: and Vega fluxes in the OM $B$, $U$, and $UVW1$ filters of
525: 5.97, 3.15, and $3.73 \times 10^{-9}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm \AA}^{-1}$.
526: We obtain $B$, $U$, and $UVW1$ band fluxes for \sn\ of 1.4, 2.0,
527: and $3.3 \times 10^{-16}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm \AA}^{-1}$, respectively.
528:
529: In order to minimize contamination of the optical/UV with potential
530: unresolved neighboring sources, we also extracted OM counts within
531: smaller apertures of 3 pixel radius ($2\farcs9$) from the centroid position
532: of \sn. Using this small aperture we obtain $m_{\rm UVW1}=(17.9 \pm 0.1)$~mag,
533: $f_{\rm UVW1}=2.6 \times 10^{-16}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}~$\AA$^{-1}$, and
534: $L_{\rm UVW1}=9.0 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$.
535:
536: \subsection{$R$-Band and H$\alpha$ Imaging}
537:
538: Our 2005.0 MDM $R$-band image of the \sn\ region in M100 is shown in
539: Figs.~\ref{spiral} and \ref{optical}, along with the 2002.0 \X\ OM $U$-band
540: image, and the 1996.6 {\sl HST} WFPC-PC1 red (F675W), H$\alpha$ (F658N),
541: $B$-band (F439W), and $U$-band (F336W) images.
542: The MDM $R$-band image shows a bright source at the position of \sn\ with a strength
543: that suggests little change in $R$-band luminosity from that seen in the 1996.6
544: {\sl HST} F675W images. Although the WFPC2 F675W and $R$(Harris) bandpasses are
545: different in wavelength coverage (F675W bandpass: 6,000--7,500~\AA; $R$(Harris)
546: bandpass: 5,600--8,200~\AA), they are both about equally sensitive to the
547: strong and broad emission lines of [O~I] $\lambda\lambda$6300,6364, H$\alpha$,
548: and [O~II] $\lambda\lambda$7319,7330 which dominate the late-time spectrum of
549: \sn\ (Fesen et al.\ 1999). This permits one to roughly equate these two
550: filter images for purposes of comparing total emission line levels in \sn.
551:
552: Relative flux measurements on the WFPC2-PC1 F675W and MDM $R$-band images of the
553: \sn\ source and several surrounding point sources, including the bright source
554: $2\farcs0$ nearly due east, were taken and indicate SN~1979C's 2005.0
555: 6,000--7,500~\AA\ flux has remained constant to $\pm$0.25~mag from its 1996.6 level.
556: Concerning the current level of H$\alpha$ flux, the poor image quality of the
557: MDM H$\alpha$ image, differences in filter passbands between the WFPC2/F658N
558: ($\lambda_{0}$ = 6,591~\AA; FWHM = 29~\AA) and the MDM 8K/H$\alpha$
559: filter ($\lambda_{0}$ = 6,565~\AA; FWHM = 80~\AA), plus uncertainty as to the
560: association of a strong, narrow H$\alpha$ at the rest frame velocity of M100 ($v$
561: = 1,570 km s$^{-1}$) with SN/CSM interaction make a definitive statement difficult.
562: Nonetheless, the ground-based image data do suggest that considerable H$\alpha$
563: emission currently exists at the \sn\ site at a level consistent with that
564: seen in the 1996.0 WFPC2-PC1 image (see Fig.~\ref{optical}, right-hand panel).
565:
566: \section{Discussion}
567: \label{discussion}
568:
569: \subsection{X-Ray Data}
570: \label{xray-data}
571:
572: \sn\ is detected at a high flux level 23~yrs after its outburst, with no
573: indication of a decline over the last six years.
574: This is in stark contrast to most other X-ray
575: SNe which typically show X-ray and radio rates of decline of
576: $L_{\rm x} \propto t^{n}$ with index $n$ in the range $0.3$--$1.4$
577: (see Immler \& Lewin 2003 and Sramek \& Weiler 2003 for review articles
578: of the X-ray and radio rates of decline). The only SN which shows
579: a similar persistent X-ray lightcurve is SN~1978K (Schlegel et~al.\
580: 1999, 2004). Clearly, the high inferred flux is indicative of large
581: amounts of shocked CSM and a high mass-loss rate in the scenario
582: of the CSM being deposited by the progenitor.
583:
584: Furthermore, our analysis may indicate a possible increase of the
585: mass-loss rate for larger stellar wind ages (see left-hand panel of
586: Fig.~\ref{massloss}) if we assume a constant velocity forward shock.
587: In order to check whether incorrect assumptions in the spectral properties
588: of \sn\ might mimic such an increase of the mass-loss rate, we investigated
589: the effect of the assumed spectral parameters used for the conversion
590: of source counts into fluxes. However, given our observed MOS count rates,
591: we cannot find spectral templates with realistic plasma temperatures
592: which could account for the apparent increase in the mass-loss rate.
593: In fact, if we adopt a spectral template which only includes a hard thermal
594: component with $10$~keV for the forward shock emission for the earlier data
595: for which no spectral information is available, the inferred flux would
596: be $37\%$ {\it lower} when compared to our
597: two-temperature thermal emission model, which takes the emergence of the
598: (softer) reverse shock into account. We therefore can not reproduce a
599: flat mass-loss rate history by changing the plasma temperatures of
600: the shocked CSM alone.
601:
602: Instead, we find that the mass-loss rate history
603: is best represented by a constant stellar wind velocity and constant
604: mass-loss rate by assuming that the shock front experienced a strong
605: deceleration. Adopting deceleration parameters derived from \VLBI\ imaging
606: (with 9,200~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for $t_{\rm w}<6~{\rm yrs}$,
607: 6,200~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for $6~{\rm yrs}<t_{\rm w}<14~{\rm yrs}$, and
608: 5,400~${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for $t_{\rm w}>20~{\rm yrs}$; Marcaide et~al.\ 2002)
609: gives a flat (${\rm slope}=0$) mass-loss rate history (see right-hand panel
610: of Fig.~\ref{massloss}). This indicates that the assumed deceleration
611: parameters are indeed plausible, and contradict claims for a free expansion
612: based on the same \VLBI\ data (Bartel \& Bietenholz 2003).
613:
614: The early upper limit from the merged \E\ data 0.66~yrs after the outburst,
615: however, is in conflict with
616: a constant stellar wind velocity and constant mass-loss rate model
617: (see Fig.~\ref{massloss}). Similarly to \sn, an early \R\ upper limit
618: to the X-ray flux of the SN Ic~1994I on day 52 has been reported to be
619: in conflict with the X-ray evolution in terms of a simple power-law,
620: and with a constant mass-loss rate and wind velocity (Immler et~al.\ 2002).
621: This is indicative that a simple power-law model for the X-ray rate of
622: decline might be incomplete for describing the early epoch in the CSM
623: interaction. Assuming an initial exponential rise of the X-ray luminosity
624: after the outburst (at time $t_0$) and a subsequent power-law decline with
625: index $s$, we can parameterize the X-ray evolution as
626: $f_{\rm x} \propto (t-t_0)^{-s} \times e^{-\tau}$ with $\tau \propto (t-t_0)^{-\beta}$.
627: This model has been successfully used to describe the time dependence of the
628: radio emission of SNe (Weiler et al.\ 1986) and the X-ray emission of SN~1994I
629: (Immler et~al.\ 2002). In this representation the external absorption of the
630: emission is represented by the $e^{-\tau}$ term (`optical depth') and the
631: time-dependence of the optical depth is parameterized by the exponent $\beta$.
632: The rise of the X-ray flux could be either due to a decreasing absorption by
633: intervening material along the line-of-sight to the X-ray emitting hot gas or
634: could simply indicate a non-production of soft X-rays at early times.
635: Unfortunately, the lack of high-quality data for \sn\ at early times precludes
636: a more detailed investigation. The low inferred mass-loss rate around 0.66~yrs
637: after the outburst of \sn, however, could be due to such an exponential increase
638: in the X-ray emission. The data can therefore be reconciled with a constant
639: mass-loss rate history if we assume an initial rise of the emission, which
640: is observationally not further constrained.
641:
642: Long-term X-ray lightcurves and high-quality spectra are also
643: available for SNe 1993J (Immler et~al.\ 2001; Zimmermann \& Aschenbach
644: 2003) and 1978K (Schlegel et~al.\ 2004). While the overall X-ray lightcurve
645: of SN~1993J is best described by a $t^{-0.3}$ rate of decline,
646: significant `bumps' around day $\approx$ 1,000 are observed, which might be
647: due to a change in the slope of the CSM density profile
648: (Zimmermann \& Aschenbach 2003). \VLBI\ imaging revealed that the expanding
649: shock region has a circular morphology, which is indicative of a smooth CSM.
650: Based on the X-ray and radio data, a significant change in the
651: mass-loss rate of the SN~1993J progenitor was discovered, with a
652: continuous decrease from $\dot{M}=4\times10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$
653: to $4\times10^{-5}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ during the late stages of
654: the evolution (Immler et~al.\ 2001; van Dyk et~al.\ 1994).
655: This evolution has been interpreted as a transition
656: in the progenitor's evolution from the red to the blue supergiant phase
657: during the last $\approx 10,000$~yrs of the evolution (Immler et~al.\ 2001).
658: While a deceleration of the shock could not account for the change in the
659: mass-loss rate history for SN~1993J, correction for a strongly
660: decelerated shock produces a flat mass-loss rate history for \sn\ with
661: $\dot{M} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}~(v_{\rm w}/10~{\rm km~s}^{-1})$.
662: The bumpy CSM structure inferred for \sn\ based on our analysis might
663: be largely explained by systematic and statistical uncertainties in the
664: X-ray flux, especially when the cross-calibration uncertainties between
665: \E, \R, \C, and \X\ are taken into account (which would add an
666: additional $\ls10$\% to the errors quoted in this paper;
667: see Snowden 2002 and the EPIC Calibration Documentation\footnote{available at
668: http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/external/xmm\_sw\_cal/calib/index.shtml}).
669: We therefore conclude that \sn\ does not show any evidence for a
670: change in the stellar wind parameters.
671:
672: The X-ray spectrum of \sn\ is best described by a two-temperature
673: thermal plasma emission model with $kT_{\rm low}=0.78^{+0.25}_{-0.17}$~keV,
674: $kT_{\rm high}=4.1^{+76}_{-2.3}$~keV, accounting for 64\% and 36\% of
675: the total (0.3--2~keV) flux, respectively, and no intrinsic absorption.
676: Single-component fits cannot be statistically excluded and give a similar
677: temperature ($kT=0.60^{+0.12}_{-0.19}$~keV for a thermal plasma fit;
678: $kT=0.53^{+1.40}_{-0.33}$~keV for a thermal bremsstrahlung fit) and flux
679: compared to the soft component of the two-temperature fit. The hard and soft
680: spectral components are likely due to emission from the forward (hard component)
681: and reverse shock (soft component). While minor contamination of the spectrum
682: with unresolved XRBs within the disk of M100 cannot be conclusively excluded,
683: spectral analysis of various point-source free regions within the $D_{25}$
684: ellipse of M100 give plasma temperatures significantly different from
685: the spectral components above ($kT=[0.13\pm0.08]$~keV) and likely originate
686: in hot plasma within or above the disk of M100.
687:
688: Similarly to \sn, a best-fit two-temperature thermal plasma model
689: with $kT_{\rm low}=(0.34\pm0.04)$~keV and $kT_{\rm high}=(6.54\pm4)$~keV
690: was observed for SN~1993J based on high-quality \X\ spectroscopy
691: eight years after its outburst (Zimmermann \& Aschenbach 2003).
692: While these temperatures differ from the plasma temperatures found for \sn\
693: ($kT_{\rm low}=0.78^{+0.25}_{-0.17}$~keV, $kT_{\rm high}=4.1^{+76}_{-2.3}$~keV)
694: the overall temperature evolution for SN~1993J with a softening
695: over time is consistent with the spectrum of \sn\ at this late stage.
696: Since no time-resolved spectroscopy is available for \sn, we used
697: the best-fit spectral template of the \X\ MOS data to convert count
698: rates into fluxes, luminosities, and compute mass-loss rates and
699: CSM densities. Changes in the spectral properties, however, do not
700: have a significant impact on the main results from this analysis
701: (see \S\ \ref{epic}).
702:
703: \C\ data of SN~1998S, which was observed to have a similarly high
704: mass-loss rate ($2\times10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$)
705: also showed a softening of its spectrum from $10.4$~keV at day 678
706: after its outburst to $8.0$~keV on day 1,048 for a thermal plasma
707: fit with Galactic absorption only (Pooley et~al.\ 2002).
708: A more recent \X\ observation revealed the emergence of a soft
709: ($\sim0.8$~keV) component, probably from the reverse shock, in addition
710: to the harder component observed with \C\ (Immler \& Lewin 2003).
711:
712: In terms of spectral properties, \sn\ shows a striking resemblance
713: to SN~1978K. At an age of $24.2$~yrs, the X-ray spectrum of SN~1978K
714: as observed with \X\ was best-fitted with a two-temperature thermal
715: plasma spectrum ($kT_{\rm low}=0.61^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$~keV,
716: $kT_{\rm high}=3.16^{+0.44}_{-0.40}$~keV;
717: Schlegel et~al.\ 2004). Similarly to \sn, SN~1978K shows no decline
718: over the observed period and has been detected at a persistently high X-ray
719: luminosity ($L_{0.5-2}=1.5\times10^{39}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$), which places
720: both SNe into the category of strongly interacting with dense ambient CSM.
721:
722: In order to compare the CSM properties in the vicinity of recent SNe
723: for which sufficient data are available, we computed the CSM densities
724: as a function of shell expansion radii for
725: SN~1994I (Immler et~al.\ 2002),
726: SN~1993J (Immler et~al.\ 2001), and
727: SN~1978K (Schlegel et~al.\ 2004) in an identical manner.
728: While the CSM density profiles of SNe~1994I, 1993J, and 1978K can
729: be fitted with a power-law of the form $\rho_{\rm csm} = \rho_0 (r/r_0)^{-s}$
730: with $s=1.9$ (SN~1994I), $s=1.6$ (SN~1993J), and $s=1.0$ (SN~1978K), we do
731: not find a statistically acceptable fit for the CSM density profile using
732: all X-ray data of \sn\ (see Table~\ref{tab3} and Fig.~\ref{rho}).
733: If we only include the \R\ HRI and \X\ MOS detection (which have the
734: highest signal-to-noise ratio), we obtain a best-fit CSM density profile
735: of $\rho_{\rm csm} = \rho_0 (r/r_0)^{-s}$ with $s=1.6\pm1.2$.
736: Inclusion of the early \E\ upper limit gives a profile flatter than
737: $s\ls1.7$, consistent with the profile inferred from the \R\ HRI and
738: \X\ MOS data. It should be noted, however, that cross-calibration
739: uncertainties of $\ls10$\% between the \X, \R, and \E\ fluxes
740: have not been taken into account, which would increase the error to
741: the CSM profile accordingly (see \S~\ref{results_xmm}).
742:
743: While the CSM density profile is flat compared to SNe 1994I and 1993J,
744: it is statistically consistent with a constant mass-loss rate and constant
745: wind velocity profile.
746: Within the errors, the two data points for the \R\ PSPC and \C\
747: measurements are consistent with the CSM number density inferred from the
748: \R\ HRI and \X\ MOS data, and close to the extrapolated CSM density profile
749: of SN~1978K at these large radii from the site of the explosion (log\,$r[{\rm cm}] = 17.50$
750: and $17.59$; see Fig.~\ref{rho}). A higher assumed wind velocity would
751: further decrease the CSM number densities and give an even closer match
752: to the extrapolated SN~1978K profile.
753: Even though clumps in the CSM leading to an increase in the CSM density
754: cannot be conclusively excluded, the seeming `jump' in the CSM density between
755: log\,$r[{\rm cm}] =17.67$ (\R\ PSPC) and $17.82$ (\C\ ACIS data) is likely
756: caused by the large errors associated with the low photon statistics of
757: these observations and cross-calibration uncertainties between the
758: different instruments.
759:
760: Spatially resolved \VLBI\ radio imaging of \sn\ at an age of $t=22$~yrs
761: have, in fact, shown a uniform shell-like structure with no evidence
762: for a clumpy CSM or a geometry different from spherically symmetric
763: (Bartel \& Bietenholz 2003). Radio monitoring of \sn\ over the past
764: decades has shown significant quasi-periodic or sinusoidal modulations
765: in the radio flux (see Fig.~2 in Montes et~al.\ 2000). These modulations
766: in the radio lightcurve have been discussed in the context of a modulation
767: of the stellar wind by a binary companion in a highly eccentric orbit
768: (Weiler et~al.\ 1992; Montes et~al.\ 2000).
769: The lack of a change
770: in the radio spectral index over the monitored period, however, indicates an
771: unchanged emission mechanism with constant efficiency (Montes et~al.\ 2000).
772: Our X-ray data do not support a substantial change in the CSM density profile,
773: but confirm a scenario in which the shock interacts with a dense CSM
774: ($\gs 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3})$.
775:
776: \subsection{Optical/UV Data}
777:
778: Late-time optical and UV photometry and spectroscopy can yield
779: interesting insights into the CSM properties, such as electron densities,
780: shock velocities and ionization states of the shocked CSM.
781: From these, conclusions can be drawn on the nature and mass of
782: the progenitor, as well as on its evolution.
783: Of particular interest are the late-time optical
784: and UV emission as a result of radiative cooling of the SN shock,
785: ionized by incident X-rays from the CSM shock interaction and by
786: the SN event itself (Chevalier \& Fransson 1994).
787:
788: Multi-band \H\ imaging of the environment of \sn\ was successfully used
789: to recover optical emission from \sn\ at $t \approx 20$~yrs after its
790: outburst (van Dyk et~al.\ 1999). The \H\ data showed \sn\ to be
791: the brightest source at any observed wavelength band ($U, B, V, R, I$) within
792: a small stellar cluster of red supergiants and young blue stars.
793: While \sn\ had magnitudes of
794: $m_{\rm U} = 23.2$~mag,
795: $m_{\rm B} = 23.3$~mag,
796: $m_{\rm V} = 22.1$~mag,
797: $m_{\rm I} = 21.0$~mag,
798: the next brightest optical/UV sources in the environment had
799: $m_{\rm V} \gs 24$~mag and $m_{\rm I} \gs 23$~mag.
800: The \H\ images further suggest the presence of 5--7 additional, although
801: faint, UV-emitting stars at the site. Three more UV sources were imaged
802: with the \H\ further to the east ($\approx2''$), which are located within
803: the OM counts extraction aperture ($2\farcs9$ radius).
804: It is therefore possible that these sources contribute a significant fraction
805: to the observed optical/UV flux within the extracted aperture.
806: %it is likely that most of the UV flux as measured by the \X\ OM ($\gs65\%$)
807: %is due to the SN itself.
808:
809: The new ground-based $R$-band and H$\alpha$ images taken in December 2004,
810: some 25.6~yrs after the outburst, continue to indicate a strong CSM interaction,
811: three years after the \X\ observations. This suggests that both
812: H$\alpha$ and the broad [O I] and [O II] line emissions seen in the 1993
813: spectra are still of comparable strength to levels more than a decade earlier.
814:
815: Little is known to date about the late-time spectra of SNe shortward of
816: 5,000~\AA. UV emission is detected from the position of \sn\ with a
817: $UVW1$-band luminosity of $L_{\rm UVW1}=9 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$.
818: Comparison of the H$\alpha$ and UV luminosities of \sn\ show
819: an interesting similarity
820: ($L_{\rm H\alpha} = 1.6 \times 10^{37}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$,
821: van Dyk et~al.\ 1999). The H$\alpha$ lightcurve of
822: \sn\ shows no decline between 1987 and 1991 (Fesen et~al.\ 1999),
823: while a slight increase in the 1993 data is observed, which
824: coincides with the observed flattening of the radio lightcurve.
825: A similar H$\alpha$ luminosity was observed
826: for the Type II-L SN~1980K ($2.5 \times 10^{37}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$;
827: Fesen et~al.\ 1999) at an age of 14--15 years after its explosion.
828: These high late-time H$\alpha$ luminosities are largely the result
829: of high electron densities ($n_{\rm e} \gs 10^4$--$10^5~{\rm cm}^{-3}$),
830: which are supported by the high inferred CSM densities in this paper
831: ($\gs 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$).
832:
833: The OM $U$-band data show a bright source at the position of \sn\
834: ($L_{\rm U} = 5 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$), while the \H\
835: data from 1996 show very weak emission from \sn\ in the $U$-band.
836: This difference can be attributed to the cut-off of the \H\ $U$-band
837: filter redward to 3,800~\AA, while the $U$-band filter of the OM
838: cuts off at 3,950~\AA, which then includes the broad [Ne III] emission
839: lines at $\lambda\lambda$3868,3869. The detection of [Ne III] emission lines from
840: \sn\ (Fesen et al.~1999) may explain why the SN is brighter in the \X\ OM
841: $U$-band images than in the \H\ $U$-band (F336W filter) images.
842:
843: The peak surface brightness of the OM $U$-band emission coincides with
844: the peak in the $R$-band (see Fig.~\ref{optical}), which includes broad
845: H$\alpha$, [O II] $\lambda\lambda$7319,7330, and [O I]
846: $\lambda\lambda$6300,6364 line emission from the SN ejecta,
847: and narrow H$\alpha$, presumably associated with the strong CSM interaction.
848: While the source at the position of \sn\ is classified as point-like
849: in all OM bands by the source detection routines, slightly more extended
850: emission is visible in the OM $B$ and $UVW1$-band images compared to the
851: $U$-band. This is consistent with at least a substantial fraction of the
852: $B, U$ ($\ls30\%$) and $UVW1$-band ($\gs50\%$) fluxes being to the SN itself.
853: For the $UVW1$-band, most of the flux likely arises from Mg II 2,800~\AA\
854: where the peak in the $UVW1$-band effective area is located.
855: A substantial fraction of the $B$-band flux might also be due to \sn\
856: (20--30\% contribution to the total light in this OB/SN spatial region)
857: and is due to [O III] 4,363~\AA\ line emission.
858: The contribution from the OB stars to the east may be significantly
859: reduced, relative to that from the SN, to the total flux within the
860: $U$-band passband for both the \H\ and OM filters, due to the Balmer
861: jump at 3,600~\AA\ in the stellar spectra of these stars.
862:
863: Because of the strong appearance of \sn\ in the OM $U$-band image, the
864: [Ne III] emission may have substantially increased in strength since the
865: \H\ spectra obtained in 1996 (Fesen et al.~1999). It should be kept in mind,
866: however, that the
867: \H\ data were acquired before the increase of \sn\ at radio wavelengths.
868: This increase could be caused by either a higher ionization of the CSM
869: interaction and/or a lowering of the local reddening/extinction due to dust
870: evaporation via shocks (i.e., dust in the CSM) or less ejecta formed dust
871: via dilution from expansion.
872:
873: In summary, the high inferred optical/UV flux for \sn, especially in
874: the $U$-band, further suggests continued strong CSM interaction even at this
875: late stage in the evolution and large radii from the site of the explosion,
876: which is also supported by our recent MDM $R$-band data,
877: and confirms our results which are independently inferred from the X-ray data.
878:
879: \section{Summary}
880: \label{summary}
881:
882: In this paper we present a comprehensive study of the Type II-L
883: \sn\ in X-rays and in the optical/UV based on \X\ data, all archival X-ray
884: data available to date, as well as archival optical data from the \H\ and
885: a recent MDM observation. Key findings are: \\
886:
887: \noindent
888: $\bullet$~\sn\ is observed at a high X-ray luminosity 23~yrs after its
889: outburst ($L_{0.3-2}=8\times10^{38}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$) and shows no
890: evidence for a decline over the observed period of $16$--$23$~yrs after
891: its outburst.
892:
893: \noindent
894: $\bullet$~The X-ray spectrum, measured for the first time, gives a
895: best-fit two-temperature thermal plasma model with
896: $kT_{\rm high}=4.1^{+76}_{-2.3}$~keV,
897: $kT_{\rm low}=0.76^{+0.25}_{-0.17}$~keV and Galactic absorption only,
898: characteristic for emission from both the forward (hard component)
899: and reverse shock (soft component). The spectral properties are similar
900: to that of other core-collapse SNe, such as SNe 1978K and 1993J.
901:
902: \noindent
903: $\bullet$~After correction for a decelerating shock front we find no
904: evidence for a change in the progenitor's mass-loss rate
905: ($\dot{M} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$)
906: over a period of $\gs16,000$~yrs in the stellar evolution of the progenitor.
907:
908: \noindent
909: $\bullet$~High CSM number densities ($\gs 10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$) are inferred
910: for \sn\ even at large radii (out to $\approx 4 \times 10^{17}~{\rm cm}$)
911: from the site of the explosion, similar to SN~1978K.
912: The CSM density profile can be fitted with a power law of
913: the form $\rho_{\rm csm} = \rho_0 (r/r_0)^{-s}$ with index $s \ls 1.7$
914: comparable to other SNe (e.g., SNe 1994I and 1993J), and support a constant
915: mass-loss rate and a constant stellar wind velocity.
916:
917: \noindent
918: $\bullet$~A point-like optical/UV source is detected at the position
919: of \sn\ with the Optical Monitor on-board \X, with
920: $U$, $B$, and $UVW1$-band luminosities of
921: $L_{\rm U} = 5 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$,
922: $L_{\rm B} = 7 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$, and
923: $L_{\rm UVW1} = 9 \times 10^{36}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$,
924: similar to its H$\alpha$ and $R$-band luminosity.
925: The high luminosities, especially in the $U$-band arising from
926: Mg II 2,800~\AA\ and in the $UVW1$-band from [Ne III]
927: $\lambda\lambda$3868,3869 emission lines, indicate substantial CSM interaction
928: in the late-time evolution of \sn\ and independently support
929: the strong observed CSM interaction as observed in X-rays.
930:
931: \acknowledgments
932:
933: This paper is based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA
934: science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by
935: ESA Member States and NASA.
936: The research has made use of data obtained through the High Energy
937: Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center Online Service, provided by
938: the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.
939: KWW wishes to thank the Office of Naval Research (ONR) for the 6.1
940: funding supporting his research.
941:
942: \begin{thebibliography}{}
943:
944: \bibitem[2003]{bartel03}Bartel, N., Bietenholz, M. F. 2003, \apj, 591, 301
945: \bibitem[1994]{chevfran94}Chevalier, R. A., Fransson C. 1994, \apj, 420, 268
946: \bibitem[{Crotts(2001)}]{Crotts01}Crotts, A.~P.~S. 2001, BAAS, 33, 792
947: \bibitem[1990]{dickey90}Dickey, J. M., Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARAA, 28, 215
948: \bibitem[1993]{fesen93}Fesen, R. A., Matonick, D. M. 1993, \apj, 407, 110
949: \bibitem[1999]{fesen99}Fesen, R. A., Gerardy, C. L., Filippenko, A, V.,
950: Matheson, Th., Chevalier, R. A., Kirshner, R. P., Schmidt, B. P.,
951: Challis, P., Fransson, C., Leibundgut, B., van Dyk, S. D.
952: 1999, \aap, 117, 725
953: \bibitem[1996]{flc96}Fransson, C. Lundqvist, P. Chevalier, R. A. 1996 \apj, 461, 993
954: \bibitem[1994]{Freedman94}Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Mould, J.R., et al.\
955: 1994, Nat 371, 757
956: \bibitem[1998]{immler98}Immler, S., Pietsch, W., Aschenbach, B. 1998, \aap, 331, 601
957: \bibitem[2001]{immler01}Immler, S., Aschenbach, B., Wang, Q. D.,
958: 2001, \apj, 561, L107
959: \bibitem[2002]{immler02}Immler, S., Wilson, A. S., Terashima, Y.,
960: 2002, \apj, 573, L27
961: \bibitem[2003]{immler03}Immler, S., Lewin, W. 2003, in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray
962: Bursters (ed K. Weiler), Lecture Notes in Physics, 598, 91
963: \bibitem[1979]{johnson79}Johnson, G. E. 1979, IAU Circ., No. 3348
964: \bibitem[2001]{kaaret01}Kaaret, P. 2001, \apj, 560, 715
965: \bibitem[2002]{marcaide02}Marcaide, J. M., P\'erez-Torres, M. A., Ros, E.,
966: Alberdi, A., Diamond, P. J., Guirado, J. C., Lara, L., Van Dyk, S. D.,
967: Weiler, K. W. 2002, \aap, 384, 408
968: \bibitem[2000]{montes00}Montes, M. J., Weiler, K. W., Van Dyk, S. D.,
969: Panagia, N., Lacey, Ch. K., Sramek, R. A., Park, R.
970: 2000, \apj, 532, 1124
971: \bibitem[2002]{pooley02}Pooley D., Lewin, W. H. G., Fox, D. W., et al.
972: 2002, \apj, 572, 932
973: \bibitem[2001]{ray01}Ray, A., Petre, R., Schlegel, E. M. 2001, \aj, 122, 966
974: \bibitem[1999]{schlegel99}Schlegel, E. M., Ryder, S., Staveley-Smith, L.,
975: Petre, R., Colbert, E., Dopita, M., Campbell-Wilson, D.
976: 1999, \aj, 118, 2689
977: \bibitem[2004]{schlegel04}Schlegel, E. M., Kong, A., Kaaret, P., DiStefano, R.,
978: Murray, S. 2004, \apj, 603, 644
979: \bibitem[2002]{snowden01}Snowden, S. L. 2002, in ESTEC Symposium 'New Visions of
980: the X-ray Universe in the XMM-Newton and Chandra Era', 26--30 November 2001
981: (astro-ph/0203311)
982: \bibitem[2003]{sramek03}Sramek, R. A., Weiler, K. W. 2003, in Supernovae and
983: Gamma-Ray Bursters (ed K. Weiler), Lecture Notes in Physics, 598, 145
984: \bibitem[1994]{vandyk94}van Dyk, S. D., Weiler, K. W., Sramek, R. A., Rupen, M. P.,
985: Panagia, N. 1994, \apj, 432, L115
986: \bibitem[1999]{vandyk99}van Dyk, S. D., Peng, C. Y., Barth, A. J.,
987: Filippenko, A. V., Chevalier, R. A., Fesen, R. A., Fransson, C.,
988: Kirshner, R. P., Leibundgut, B. 1999, PASP, 111, 313
989: \bibitem[1986]{weiler86}Weiler, K. W., Sramek, R. A., Panagia, N.,
990: van der Hulst, J. M., Salvati, M. 1986, \apj, 301, 790
991: \bibitem[1991]{weiler91}Weiler, K. W., van Dyk, S. D., Discenna, J. L.,
992: Panagia, N., Sramek, R. A. 1991, \apj, 380, 161
993: \bibitem[1992]{weiler92}Weiler, K. W., van Dyk, S. D., Pringle, J. E.,
994: Panagia, N, 1992, \apj, 399, 672
995: \bibitem[2001]{weiler01}Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Sramek, R. A.,
996: van Dyk, S. D., Montes, M. J., Lacey, Ch. K. 2001,
997: in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts (eds M. Livio, N. Panagia, K. Sahu),
998: Cambridge University Press, Vol 12, 198
999: %\bibitem[2004]{weiler04}Weiler, K. W. 2004, private communication
1000: \bibitem[2003]{zimmermann03}Zimmermann, H.-U., Aschenbach, B. 2003, \aap, 406, 969
1001:
1002: \end{thebibliography}
1003:
1004: %%%%%%%%%%%
1005: % Table 1 %
1006: %%%%%%%%%%%
1007:
1008: \newpage
1009: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1010: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1011: \tablecaption{X-Ray Observations of SN~1979C \label{tab1}}
1012: \tablewidth{0pt}
1013: \tablehead{
1014: \colhead{Mission} &
1015: \colhead{Instrument} &
1016: \colhead{Obs-ID/Seq-No} &
1017: \colhead{Date} &
1018: \colhead{Exposure} &
1019: \colhead{MJD}
1020: }
1021: \startdata
1022: \E\ & HRI & H1220N16.XIA & 1979-06-07 & \phantom{0}4.0~ks & 44,031 \\
1023: \E\ & HRI & H1220N16.XIB & 1979-12-12 & 13.4~ks & 44,217 \\
1024: \E\ & HRI & H1220N16.XIC & 1980-06-29 & 23.8~ks & 44,418 \\
1025: \R\ & HRI & RH600731N00 & 1995-06-17 & 42.8~ks & 49,885 \\
1026: \R\ & HRI & RH500422N00 & 1995-07-01 & \phantom{0}9.0~ks & 49,899 \\
1027: \A\ & SIS & 55044000 & 1997-12-24 & 27.3~ks & 50,806 \\
1028: \R\ & HRI & RH500542N00 & 1997-12-27 & 25.1~ks & 50,809 \\
1029: \R\ & PSPC & RP180296N00 & 1998-12-08 & \phantom{0}7.8~ks & 51,155 \\
1030: \C\ & ACIS-S & 400 & 1999-06-11 & \phantom{0}2.5~ks & 51,340 \\
1031: \X\ & MOS & 0106860201 & 2001-12-28 & 36.6~ks & 52,271
1032: \enddata
1033: \tablecomments{
1034: All \E\ HRI observations were merged into a single 41.2~ks observation.
1035: }
1036: %\tablenotetext{$\star$}{All \E\ HRI observations were merged into a single 41.2~ks observation.}
1037: \end{deluxetable}
1038:
1039: %%%%%%%%%%%
1040: % Table 2 %
1041: %%%%%%%%%%%
1042:
1043: \newpage
1044: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1045: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1046: \tablecaption{Optical/UV Observations of SN~1979C \label{tab2}}
1047: \tablewidth{0pt}
1048: \tablehead{
1049: \colhead{Telescope} &
1050: \colhead{Filter} &
1051: \colhead{Date} &
1052: \colhead{Exposure} &
1053: \colhead{MJD}
1054: }
1055: \startdata
1056: \H\ WFPC2-PC1 & U (F336W) & 1996-07-29 & 2.6~ks & 50,293 \\
1057: \H\ WFPC2-PC1 & B (F439W) & 1996-07-29 & 2.4~ks & 50,293 \\
1058: \H\ WFPC2-PC1 & R (F675W) & 1996-07-29 & 1.0~ks & 50,293 \\
1059: \H\ WFPC2-PC1 & H$\alpha$ (F658W) & 1996-07-29 & 3.9~ks & 50,293 \\
1060: \X\ OM & U & 2001-12-28 & 1.8~ks & 52,271 \\
1061: \X\ OM & B & 2001-12-28 & 2.0~ks & 52,271 \\
1062: \X\ OM & UVW1 & 2001-12-28 & 1.9~ks & 52,271 \\
1063: MDM Hiltner 2.4m & R & 2004-12-19 & 2.0~ks & 53,358 \\
1064: MDM Hiltner 2.4m & H$\alpha$ & 2004-12-19 & 3.0~ks & 53,358
1065: \enddata
1066: \end{deluxetable}
1067:
1068: %%%%%%%%%%%
1069: % Table 3 %
1070: %%%%%%%%%%%
1071:
1072: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
1073: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1074: \tablecaption{X-Ray Properties of SN~1979C \label{tab3}}
1075: \tablewidth{0pt}
1076: \tablehead{
1077: \colhead{Epoch} &
1078: \colhead{Instrument} &
1079: \colhead{$f_{0.3-2}$} &
1080: \colhead{$L_{0.3-2}$} &
1081: \colhead{$\dot{M}$} &
1082: \colhead{log\,$r$} &
1083: \colhead{$t_{\rm w}$} &
1084: \colhead{$n$} \\
1085: ${\rm [yrs]}$ & & [$10^{-14}~{\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$] & [$10^{39}~{\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$]
1086: & [$10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$] & [cm] & [yrs] & [$10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$] \\
1087: \noalign{\smallskip}
1088: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8)
1089: }
1090: \startdata
1091: \phantom{0}0.66 & \E\ HRI & $<12.78$ & $<4.47$ & $<0.71$ & 16.28
1092: & \phantom{0}\phantom{0}\,615 & $<223.87$ \\
1093: 16.18 & \R\ HRI & $2.20\pm0.37$ & $0.77\pm0.13$ & $1.45\pm0.25$ & 17.50
1094: & 14,878 & $1.17\pm0.32$ \\
1095: 16.22 & \R\ HRI & $<5.09$ & $<1.78$ & $<2.19$ & 17.51
1096: & 14,914 & $<1.17$ \\
1097: 18.71 & \A\ SIS & $<4.92$ & $<1.72$ & $<2.33$ & 17.51
1098: & 17,200 & $<1.66$ \\
1099: 18.72 & \R\ HRI & $<5.15$ & $<1.80$ & $<2.36$ & 17.51
1100: & 17,208 & $<1.66$ \\
1101: 19.67 & \R\ PSPC & $2.21\pm0.63$ & $0.77\pm0.22$ & $1.62\pm0.46$ & 17.52
1102: & 18,080 & $1.66\pm0.63$ \\
1103: 20.17 & \C\ ACIS-S&$2.23\pm0.71$ & $0.78\pm0.25$ & $1.63\pm0.52$ & 17.53
1104: & 18,546 & $1.51\pm0.56$ \\
1105: 22.72 & \X\ MOS & $2.31\pm0.26$ & $0.81\pm0.09$ & $1.75\pm0.19$ & 17.59
1106: & 20,893 & $0.85\pm0.19$
1107: \enddata
1108: \tablecomments{
1109: (1)~Epoch after the peak optical brightness (April 15, 1979) in units of yrs;
1110: (3)~0.3--2~keV X-ray band flux in units of ${\rm ergs~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$;
1111: (4)~0.3--2~keV X-ray band luminosity in units of ${\rm ergs~s}^{-1}$;
1112: (5)~mass-loss rate of the progenitor in units of $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$;
1113: (6)~log of the radius from the site of the explosion;
1114: (7)~age of the stellar wind in units of yrs;
1115: (8)~post-shock CSM number density in units of $10^4~{\rm cm}^{-3}$.
1116: }
1117: \end{deluxetable}
1118: \vfill
1119:
1120:
1121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1122: % If Figures are included %
1123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1124:
1125: \clearpage
1126: \begin{figure*}[p!]
1127: \unitlength1.0cm
1128: \begin{picture}(5,9)
1129: \put(0,0){ \begin{picture}(8,8)
1130: \psfig{figure=f1a.ps,width=9cm,angle=0}
1131: \end{picture}
1132: }
1133: \put(9.3,0){ \begin{picture}(8,8)
1134: \psfig{figure=f1b.ps,width=8.75cm,angle=0}
1135: \end{picture}
1136: }
1137: \end{picture}
1138: \caption{{\bf Left-hand panel:} Merged \X\ EPIC MOS1+MOS2 image of M100 and
1139: \sn\ in the 0.3--10~keV band in logarithmic gray-scale.
1140: The image was adaptively smoothed to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio of $10$.
1141: Contour lines are $0.65$ (black), $1$, $1.5$, $3$, $6$, $10$, and
1142: $13\times10^{-5}~{\rm cts~s}^{-1}~{\rm pix}^{-1}$. The position of \sn\
1143: is marked by a white cross. The black circle gives the $D_{25}$ ellipse of M100.
1144: {\bf Right-hand panel:} $B$ (red), $U$ (green), and $UVW1$ (blue) Optical
1145: Monitor image of M100. The small white circle (radius $7\farcs5$) is centered on
1146: the radio position of \sn. The large white circle indicates the $D_{25}$ ellipse
1147: of M100 as in the left-hand panel.}
1148: \label{image}
1149: \end{figure*}
1150: \vfill
1151:
1152: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1153: \unitlength1.0cm
1154: \begin{picture}(5,11.5)
1155: \put(-2.8,0){ \begin{picture}(5,10)
1156: \psfig{figure=f2.ps,width=17.5cm,angle=-90}
1157: \end{picture}
1158: }
1159: \end{picture}
1160: \vspace{-1.7cm}
1161: \caption{
1162: \X\ Optical Monitor $U$-band image (upper panel) and MDM 2.4-m Hiltner Telescope
1163: $R$-band image of the southern spiral arm of M100 centered on the position of \sn.
1164: The $15''$ scalebar in the lower panel applies to both panels.
1165: }
1166: \label{spiral}
1167: \end{figure*}
1168: \vfill
1169:
1170: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1171: \unitlength1.0cm
1172: \begin{picture}(5,8)
1173: \psfig{figure=f3.ps,width=12cm,angle=270}
1174: \end{picture}
1175: \caption{EPIC MOS1 and MOS2 X-ray spectra of \sn\ (upper panel).
1176: The lower panel shows the residuals of the fits in units of $\sigma$
1177: for the best-fit spectral model consisting of a two-component thermal
1178: plasma emission model (see \S \ref{results_xmm}).
1179: \label{spectrum}}
1180: \end{figure*}
1181: \vfill
1182:
1183: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1184: \unitlength1.0cm
1185: \begin{picture}(5,8)
1186: \psfig{figure=f4.ps,width=12cm,angle=0}
1187: \end{picture}
1188: \caption{Soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray lightcurve of
1189: \sn\ based on \E, \R, \A, \C, and \X\ data. Upper limits are from \E\ HRI,
1190: \R\ HRI and \A\ SIS observations. Time is given in units of $10^3$ days after
1191: the outburst of \sn\ (see Table~1). \label{lightcurve}}
1192: \end{figure*}
1193: \vfill
1194:
1195: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1196: \unitlength1.0cm
1197: \begin{picture}(5,7)
1198: \put(-1,0){ \begin{picture}(5,5.9)
1199: \psfig{figure=f5a.ps,width=10cm,angle=0}
1200: \end{picture}
1201: }
1202: \put(8.5,0){ \begin{picture}(5,5.9)
1203: \psfig{figure=f5b.ps,width=10cm,angle=0}
1204: \end{picture}
1205: }
1206: \end{picture}
1207: \caption{{\bf Left-hand panel:} Mass-loss rate history of \sn\ as a function of
1208: the stellar wind age in units of $10^3$ years before the explosion for a
1209: constant shock velocity (see Table~1 and \S \ref{results}).
1210: {\bf Right-hand panel:} Mass-loss rate history of \sn\ as a function of
1211: the stellar wind age in units of $10^3$ years before the explosion for
1212: a decelerated shock (see \S \ref{results_xmm}).}
1213: \label{massloss}
1214: \end{figure*}
1215: \vfill
1216:
1217: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1218: \unitlength1.0cm
1219: \begin{picture}(5,10)
1220: \psfig{figure=f6.ps,width=16cm,angle=0}
1221: \end{picture}
1222: \caption{Circumstellar matter density profiles as a function of SN shell
1223: expansion radii for SNe 1994I (filled triangles; Immler et~al.\ 2002),
1224: 1993J (open triangles; Immler et~al.\ 2001), 1978K (open box; this work),
1225: and 1979C (filled box; this work). Error bars for \sn\ are $\pm1\sigma$.
1226: Best-fit CSM density profiles
1227: of $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-s}$ with indices $s=-1.9$ (SN~1994I),
1228: $s=-1.6$ (SN~1993J), and $s=-1.0$ (SN~1978K) are drawn as lines.
1229: \label{rho}}
1230: \end{figure*}
1231: \vfill
1232:
1233: \begin{figure*}[h!]
1234: \unitlength1.0cm
1235: \begin{picture}(5,11)
1236: \psfig{figure=f7.ps,width=12cm,angle=0}
1237: \end{picture}
1238: \caption{
1239: \X\ OM $U$-band image (from December 28, 2001; upper left-hand panel),
1240: MDM $R$-band image (from December 19 and 20, 2004; lower left-hand panel),
1241: and \H\ WFPC2-PC1 $U, B, R$-band and H$\alpha$ images (from July 29, 1996;
1242: middle and right-hand panels) of the \sn\ region. The circles (radius $1''$)
1243: are at the \H\ $R$-band centroid position of \sn.
1244: \label{optical}}
1245: \end{figure*}
1246: \vfill
1247:
1248: \end{document}
1249:
1250:
1251: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1252:
1253: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1254: % Figure Captions Only %
1255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1256:
1257: \clearpage
1258:
1259: \figcaption[f1]
1260: {{\bf Left-hand panel:} Merged \X\ EPIC MOS1+MOS2 image of M100 and
1261: \sn\ in the 0.3--10~keV band in logarithmic gray-scale.
1262: The image was adaptively smoothed to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio of $10$.
1263: Contour lines are $0.65$ (black), $1$, $1.5$, $3$, $6$, $10$, and
1264: $13\times10^{-5}~{\rm cts~s}^{-1}~{\rm pix}^{-1}$. The position of \sn\
1265: is marked by a white cross. The black circle gives the $D_{25}$ ellipse of M100.
1266: {\bf Right-hand panel:} $B$ (red), $U$ (green), and $UVW1$ (blue) Optical
1267: Monitor image of M100. The small white circle (radius $7\farcs5$) is centered on
1268: the radio position of \sn. The large white circle indicates the $D_{25}$ ellipse
1269: of M100 as in the left-hand panel.
1270: \label{image}}
1271:
1272: \figcaption[f2]
1273: {\X\ Optical Monitor $U$-band image (upper panel) and MDM 2.4-m Hiltner Telescope
1274: $R$-band image of the southern spiral arm of M100 centered on the position of \sn.
1275: The $15''$ scalebar in the lower panel applies to both panels.
1276: \label{spiral}}
1277:
1278: \figcaption[f3]
1279: {EPIC MOS1 and MOS2 X-ray spectra of \sn\ (upper panel).
1280: The lower panel shows the residuals of the fits in units of $\sigma$
1281: for the best-fit spectral model consisting of a two-component thermal
1282: plasma emission model (see \S \ref{results_xmm}).
1283: \label{spectrum}}
1284:
1285: \figcaption[f4]
1286: {Soft (0.3--2~keV) band X-ray lightcurve of
1287: \sn\ based on \E, \R, \A, \C, and \X\ data. Upper limits are from \E\ HRI,
1288: \R\ HRI and \A\ SIS observations. Time is given in units of $10^3$ days after
1289: the outburst of \sn\ (see Table~1).
1290: \label{lightcurve}}
1291:
1292: \figcaption[f5]
1293: {{\bf Left-hand panel:} Mass-loss rate history of \sn\ as a function of
1294: the stellar wind age in units of $10^3$ years before the explosion for a
1295: constant shock velocity (see Table~1 and \S \ref{results}).
1296: {\bf Right-hand panel:} Mass-loss rate history of \sn\ as a function of
1297: the stellar wind age in units of $10^3$ years before the explosion for
1298: a decelerated shock (see \S \ref{results_xmm}).
1299: \label{massloss}}
1300:
1301: \figcaption[f6]
1302: {Circumstellar matter density profiles as a function of SN shell
1303: expansion radii for SNe 1994I (filled triangles; Immler et~al.\ 2002),
1304: 1993J (open triangles; Immler et~al.\ 2001), 1978K (open box; this work),
1305: and 1979C (filled box; this work). Error bars for \sn\ are $\pm1\sigma$.
1306: Best-fit CSM density profiles
1307: of $\rho_{\rm csm} \propto r^{-s}$ with indices $s=-1.9$ (SN~1994I),
1308: $s=-1.6$ (SN~1993J), and $s=-1.0$ (SN~1978K) are drawn as lines.
1309: \label{rho}}
1310:
1311: \figcaption[f7]
1312: {\X\ OM $U$-band image (from December 28, 2001; upper left-hand panel),
1313: MDM $R$-band image (from December 19 and 20, 2004; lower left-hand panel),
1314: and \H\ WFPC2-PC1 $U, B, R$-band and H$\alpha$ images (from July 29, 1996;
1315: middle and right-hand panels) of the \sn\ region. The circles (radius $1''$)
1316: are at the \H\ $R$-band centroid position of \sn.
1317: \label{optical}}
1318:
1319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1320:
1321: \end{document}
1322: