1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \shortauthors{Li J. Z. et al.}
3: \shorttitle{Infant star taking a UV shower}
4:
5: %\received{2003 September 16}
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{The Discovery of a Disk-Jet System Directly Exposed to Strong UV Fields in the Rosette Nebula}
9: \author{Jin Zeng Li$^{1}$, Travis A. Rector$^{2}$}
10:
11: \affil{$^{1}$National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of
12: Sciences, Beijing 100012, China (E-mail: ljz@bao.ac.cn) \\
13: $^{2}$University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA \\
14: }
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17:
18: We report on the discovery of an optical jet with a striking morphology
19: in the Rosette Nebula. It could be the most extreme case known
20: of an accretion disk and jet system directly exposed to strong ionization
21: fields that impose strong effects on its disk evolution.
22: Unlike typical optical flows, this jet system is found to have a high
23: excitation nature mainly due to disruptive interaction with the violent
24: environment. As a result, the extension of the highly-collimated jet and
25: possible former episodes of the degenerated counterjet all show bow-shocked
26: structures.
27: % Optical spectroscopy of the apparent power source, which
28: %suffers from very little extinction rather than being shrouded in an
29: %opaque extended envelope, reveals signatures of supersonic mass inflow.
30: %However, there's no simultaneous detection of noticable veiling or blue excess,
31: %which would signify mass accretion onto the central young stellar object.
32: %CaII emission, as indicators of enhanced chromospheric activity, are also
33: %absent.
34: Our results provide implications on how incipience of massive
35: stars in giant molecular clouds prevents further generations of low-mass
36: star formation, and possibly also how isolated substellar/planetary mass
37: objects in regions of massive star formation are formed.
38:
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords{Accretion disk -- Stars: formation -- Stars: pre-main sequence -- Herbig-Haro objects -- ISM: jets and outflows}
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: Herbig-Haro (HH) jets are the optical manifestations of
46: collimated outflows from young stellar objects (YSOs) in their early
47: stages of evolution and, along with typical HH objects, are apparent
48: tracers of active star formation. YSOs, unfortunately, are usually deeply
49: embedded in dense, extended envelopes and/or opaque molecular cloud
50: cores that strongly impede efforts for investigations in the optical
51: regime and make our view of the early stages of star formation still
52: quite a puzzle. In some cases, however, YSOs are located within
53: the confines of HII regions (Reipurth et al. 1998) and their power sources
54: suffer very low extinction and are therefore optically visible. Similar
55: jets immersed in a photoionized medium were identified in the Orion
56: nebula and near the late B stars in NGC~1333 (Bally et al. 2000;
57: Bally \& Reipurth 2001).
58: However, some properties of photoionized jets in HII regions are
59: found to be highly dependent on their environment. Those immersed in the
60: outskirts of HII regions, or near soft-UV radiation sources such as late B stars,
61: tend to emerge as bipolar jets which usually share a ``C" shaped appearance
62: (Bally et al. 2000; Bally \& Reipurth 2001), whereas jets deeply embedded
63: in HII regions
64: endure a more disruptive environment and seem to favor highly asymmetric
65: or even monopolar jet formation (Reipurth et al. 1998).
66:
67: The Rosette Nebula is a spectacular HII region excavated by the strong
68: stellar winds from O stars in the center of the young open
69: cluster NGC~2244, which has an age of about 3 x $10^6$ yr (Ogura \& Ishida 1981).
70: This on-going star forming region (Meaburn \& Walsh 1986;
71: Clayton et al. 1998; Phelps \& Lada 1997; Li et al. 2002; Li 2003) is located
72: at a distance of $\sim$1500 pc at the tip of a giant molecular cloud
73: complex with an extent of around 100 pc (Dorland \& Montmerle 1987).
74: In this paper, we present the discovery of an optical jet system embedded
75: in the Rosette Nebula with a fascinating morphology that displays exceptional
76: new features not known before.
77:
78: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
79:
80: \subsection{Narrowband Imaging}
81:
82: Narrow band images of the Rosette Nebula were obtained 3 March 1999 with the
83: Kitt Peak National Observatory 0.9-meter telescope and the 8k$\times$8k MOSAIC I
84: camera (Muller et al. 1998). Images were taken with the H${\alpha}$,
85: [OIII] and [SII] filters, whose central wavelengths/FWHMs are 6569\AA/80\AA, 5021\AA/55\AA,
86: and 6730\AA/80\AA, respectively. For each filter, five exposures of 600~seconds
87: were taken, each image slightly offset to fill in physical gaps between the
88: MOSAIC CCDs. The pixel scale is 0.423\arcsec~pixel$^{-1}$, resulting in a 59\arcmin~x~59\arcmin\
89: field of view. An astrometric solution for these images was determined with
90: the use of stars in the Guide Star Catalog 1.2 (Roser et al. 1998). The astrometric
91: accuracy in the optical images presented is $\sim$1\arcsec.
92:
93: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}
94:
95: Optical spectroscopy of the jet system, with a
96: 200\AA~mm$^{-1}$, 4.8\AA~pixel$^{-1}$ dispersion, and a 2.5\arcsec slit,
97: was carried out with the 2.16m telescope of the National Astronomical
98: Observatories of China on 10 and 16 January 2003, with slit positions
99: along and orthogonal to the jet direction. A possible
100: physical companion of the apparent power source was also observed with the
101: orthogonal slit position to avoid contamination from the jet system.
102: An OMR (Optomechanics Research Inc.) spectrograph and a Tektronix 1024${\times}$1024 CCD
103: detector were used in this run of observations.
104:
105: The spectral data were reduced following
106: standard procedures in the NOAO Image Reduction and Analysis Facility
107: (IRAF, version 2.11) software package. The CCD reductions included bias
108: and flat-field correction, successful nebular background subtraction, and
109: cosmic rays removal. Wavelength calibration was performed based on helium-argon
110: lamps exposed at both the beginning and the end of the observations every night.
111: Flux density calibration of each spectrum was conducted based on observations of at
112: least two of the KPNO spectral standards (Massey et al. 1988) per night.
113:
114: \section{Results and Discussion}
115:
116: \subsection{The Jet System}
117:
118: An optical jet system with a striking morphology was identified
119: when scrutinizing the narrow band images of the Rosette Nebula (Fig. 1). A
120: prominent jet with a position angle of 312\arcdeg\ is clearly seen traced back
121: to a faint visible star, indicating rather low extinction along the
122: line of sight. The circumstellar envelope of the YSO
123: might have been stripped away, leaving a photoablating disk exposed
124: to the strong UV radiation field of the exciting sources in the HII region.
125: The optical jet remains highly collimated for a projected distance
126: of $>$8000~AU from the energy source if a mean distance
127: of 1500 pc to Rosette is adopted. At the end of the collimated jet is a
128: side-impacted shock structure, probably due to severe radiation pressure from the
129: strong UV field present and strong stellar winds encountered.
130: A prominent knot or compact mass bullet resembling a point source is immediately
131: noticed in the highly collimated part of the jet with a projected separation of
132: 7\arcsec\ from the source. Another one or
133: two knots can be marginally noticed in the bow shaped extension of the jet,
134: indicating episodic eruption events from the driving source.
135: % which could well be an example case of ablated jet from a low mass YSO ?
136:
137: We infer the possible existence of
138: a counterjet from the presence of a promising bow shock
139: structure on the opposite side of the jet. Successive episodes
140: of counterjet ejection may have ceased or may be too faint.
141: Alternatively, this structure may simply be shocked
142: interstellar material that was swept up and photoionized by the strong
143: radiation field, which happen to be projected onto the vicinity of
144: the jet exciting source. Another possible explanation is that it is
145: disrupted jet material from a possible T Tauri companion (please refer to
146: Fig.~1) or from nearby young stars. If it is indeed a
147: degenerated counterjet, however, it may be the only existing observational
148: evidence for how bipolar jets evolve into monopolar or
149: highly asymmetric jets.
150: We further argue that the long-puzzling high-velocity components from
151: the photoionized gas fronts aggregated in the Rosette (Meaburn \& Walsh 1986; Clayton \& Meaburn 1995; Clayton, Meaburn \& Lopez et al. 1998) could
152: actually be from rapidly disrupted young disk-jet systems in the inner
153: part of the HII region. Diffuse [OIII] emission is prominent from
154: all parts of the jet system, which is likely due to its photo-dissipating nature.
155: [SII] emission from the highly-collimated part
156: of the jet decreases rapidly from the base of the jet and is undetected
157: in the shocked structures, indicating a steep decline of internal
158: shock effects or rather overwhelming external ionization.
159:
160: Spectroscopic observation along the jet direction reveals prominent H$\alpha$
161: ($W_{\lambda} \sim$~35\AA) as well as [SII] emission. The presence of
162: significant [OIII] $\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007 line emission
163: confirms our suspicion that the jet is in a high-excitation state.
164: Fig. 2 clearly shows the existence of a weak counterjet as discussed above.
165: Note that enhanced [NII] emission is detected along the jet, which is not
166: shown here.
167:
168: \subsection{The exciting source}
169:
170: Spectroscopic observations of the exciting source reveal primarily the
171: spectrum of a normal F8Ve star with weak H$\alpha$ ($W_{\lambda} \sim$~6.7\AA)
172: and prominent [OIII] emission. However, the spectrum also shows a
173: significant red-displaced absorption component in H$\alpha$, with
174: a receding velocity of 500$\pm$50~km~s$^{-1}$ (Fig. 3). Two weak
175: but significant emission features with unclear nature are also present immediately
176: to the red of the rest H$\alpha$ emission and its red-displaced absorption. One is
177: centered at 6582.5 \AA~ with an accuracy of $\pm$ 1 \AA~, and can be
178: the pronounced [NII] $\lambda$ 6583.6 emission detected also along the jet.
179: This gives a high [NII] to H$\alpha$ flux ratio of about 1:3.
180: Albeit the other with a central wavelength of 6613.3 \AA~ cannot be identified
181: with any known emission lines with rest velocities. A possible interpretation
182: is a red-displaced emission component of H$\alpha$. This however would suggest
183: an extraordinarily high receding velocity of 2300$\pm$50~km~s$^{-1}$ and should
184: be treated with great caution. The possible ejection of high velocity, compact
185: mass bullets from the energy source, if true, can be partially supported by the
186: clear existence of a compact knot in the highly collimated part of the jet
187: as mentioned in the previous subsection, and may offer a big challenge to
188: currently available disk-jet models. This scenario, however, seems to match well
189: with Meaburn's (2003) recent speculations on the formation of ablated jets
190: in HII regions.
191: % introduces highly-prejudiced jet driving from the power source in opposite directions.
192:
193: Spectral energy distribution (Kurucz 1991) fitting of the energy source
194: based on spectroscopic observations and data extracted from 2MASS indicated a relic
195: disk mass of only 0.006 M$_{\odot}$, consistent with a photoablating
196: origin of the system. It is noteworthy that Inverse P Cygni (IPC) profiles
197: seldom appear in low Balmer
198: emission lines such as H$\alpha$. The most well known case is the YY Orionis
199: type, weak-lined T Tauri star T Cha (Alcala, Covino \& Franchini et al. 1993),
200: from which, at most, a relic circumstellar
201: disk can be expected. An IPC profile in H$\alpha$ is usually attributed to its
202: optically thin nature, which normally leads to the conclusion of a high
203: inclination angle of the relic disk. Furthermore, this must happen under
204: tight conditions such as low-density in the residual circumstellar
205: material and weak H$\alpha$ emission (Alcala, Covino \& Franchini et al. 1993).
206: Both are consistent with properties of this jet system.
207:
208: \subsection{Implications}
209:
210: A similar red-displaced absorption profile is also extracted
211: around the power source from the spectra taken along the jet direction,
212: which helps to elucidate the reliability of the spectral reduction and time
213: elapsed mass accretion of the central YSO. The simultaneous existence of
214: signatures of mass inflow and outflow, along with the absence of apparent
215: veiling or blue excess, the absence of signatures of chromospheric
216: activity, and its weak or absent Balmer emission in combination is strong evidence
217: that the forming star is highly affected by its location in the strong UV
218: radiation fields. Indeed, Reipurth et al. (1998) state that external ionization may
219: help on the feeding and/or launching of the jet, which makes jet formation in such
220: systems survive. We further speculate that the aforementioned effects eventually
221: change the configuration of the stellar-disk magnetosphere
222: such that photodissipated material in the relic disk is
223: easily loaded onto the magnetic channels, especially on the side facing the
224: strong radiation fields. It is conceivable that most or all of this material could
225: have been ejected in the form of a jet on the opposite side of the
226: mass loading, instead of eventually ramming into the
227: contracting infant star embarrassed with starvation.
228: It's therefore hard for the energy source to further grow in mass, its accretion
229: disk could be dissipated on a comparatively short time scale and its evolution
230: toward the main sequence is either highly accelerated or in some cases even led
231: to the formation of a failed star that would have evolved into a higher mass
232: star under normal conditions.
233: Many young, very low mass stars and brown dwarfs
234: are found to show evidence of mass accretion from its circumstellar environment
235: (Fernandez \& Comeron 2001; Luhman, Briceno \& Stauffer 2003; Jayawardhana,
236: Mohanty \& Basri 2003; White \& Basri, 2003). This study presents
237: further implications on how incipience of
238: massive stars in giant molecular clouds inhibits further generations of low-mass
239: star formation. It could also well serve as an inspiring case of how isolated
240: substellar/planetary mass objects in regions of massive star formation, especially
241: those found in HII regions (Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000), were prohibited from
242: growing in mass, ceased their accretion process and came into being.
243:
244: {\flushleft \bf Acknowledgments~}
245:
246: We are grateful to an anonymous referee for the
247: many helpful comments on the paper. Thanks prof. You-Hua Chu very much
248: for her valuable comments and suggestions. Appreciations
249: to prof. W. P. Chen and W. H. Ip for their kind accommodations and help
250: during my two years stay at NCU. This work has made use of the 2MASS database.
251:
252: \begin{thebibliography}{}
253:
254: \bibitem[]{255} Alcala, J. M., Covino, E., Franchini, M., et al. 1993, A\&A 272, 225
255: \bibitem[]{256} Bally, J., O'Dell, C. R., \& McCaughrean, M. J. 2000, AJ 119, 2919
256: \bibitem[]{257} Bally, J., \& Reipurth, B. 2001, ApJ 546, 299
257: \bibitem[]{258} Bally, J. \& Devine D., 1994, ApJ 428, L65
258: \bibitem[]{259} Bally, J. \& Devine D., 1997, IAUS 182, 29
259: \bibitem[]{260} Clayton, C. A. \& Meaburn, J., 1995, A\&A 302, 202
260: \bibitem[]{261} Clayton, C. A., Meaburn, J., Lopez, J. A., et al. 1998, A\&A 334, 264
261: \bibitem[]{262} Dorland, H. \& Montmerle, T., 1987, A\&A 177, 243
262: \bibitem[]{263} Fernandez, M. \& Comeron, F., 2001, A\&A 380, 264
263: \bibitem[]{264} Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S. \& Basri, G., 2003, ApJ 592, 282
264: \bibitem[]{265} Kurucz, R. L. 1991, in: Davis Philip, A. G., Upgren, A. R., Janes, K.A. (eds.), Precision photometry: Astrophysics of the galaxy, L. Davis press, Schenectady, New York
265: \bibitem[]{266} Li, J. Z., 2003, ChJAA Letters, in press
266: \bibitem[]{267} Li, J. Z., Wu, C. H. \& Chen, W. P. et al., 2002, AJ 123, 2590
267: \bibitem[]{268} Luhman, K. L., Briceno, C., Stauffer, J. R., et al. 2003, ApJ 590, 348
268: \bibitem[]{269} Massey, P., Strobel, K., Barnes, J. V., et. al., 1988, ApJ 328, 315
269: \bibitem[]{270} Meaburn, J. \& Redman, M. P., 2003, {\it RevMexAA\/}, 15, 1
270: \bibitem[]{271} Meaburn, J. \& Walsh, J. R., 1986, MNRAS 220, 745
271: \bibitem[]{272} Muller, G. P., Reed, R., Armandroff, T. et al., 1998, Proc. SPIE 3355, 577
272: \bibitem[]{273} Ogura, K. \& Ishida, K., 1981, PASJ 33, 149
273: \bibitem[]{274} Phelps, R. L. \& Lada, E. A., 1997, ApJ 477, 176
274: \bibitem[]{275} Reipurth, B., Bally, J., Fesen, R. A., \& Devine D. 1998, Nature 396,343
275: \bibitem[]{276} Roser, S., Morrison, J. E. \& Bucciarelli, B. et al., 1998, in IAU Symposium 179, New Horizons from Multi-wavelength Sky Surveys, eds B. J. McLean, D. A. Golombek, J. J. E. Hayes, and H. E. Payne (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 420
276: \bibitem[]{277} White, R. J. \& Basri, G., 2003, ApJ 582, 1109
277: \bibitem[]{278} Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Bejar, V. J. S., Martin, E. L., et al., 2000, Science 290, 103
278:
279: \end{thebibliography}
280: \bibliographystyle{aa}
281:
282: \clearpage
283:
284: \figcaption[f1.eps]{The H$\alpha$ imaging of the jet system (3\arcmin.2 x 2\arcmin.7). North
285: is up and east is to the left. The prominent
286: jet, at the lower center of the image, and its extended bow shock structure as a
287: whole extended to $\sim$0.13 pc away from the driving source. Assuming that the
288: jet has an inclination of 45\arcdeg\ off the plane of the sky and a typical flow
289: velocity of 150~km~s$^{-1}$, a lower
290: limit of the kinematic age of the jet of $\sim$1200~yr is derived. The apparent
291: power source is located
292: at R.A. = 06h32m20.76s, Dec = 04d53m02.9s (J2000). A possible companion also exists, for which
293: the coordinates from 2MASS are R.A. = 06h32m20.79s, Dec = 04d52m58.1s (J2000).
294: Optical spectroscopy of this star shows prominent Balmer
295: emission lines ($W_{\lambda}$ of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ are 72\AA\ \& 51\AA, respectively)
296: are superimposed on spectrum of a low-reddening K dwarf.
297: Both components of the possible binary system are therefore T Tauri stars
298: previously unknown in this region. However, no strong intervention between
299: the two is apparent.}
300:
301: \figcaption[f2.eps]{Contour map of the H$\alpha$ emission along the jet direction.
302: Note that low-resolution spectroscopy was employed
303: in this run of observations and no prominent velocity difference between the
304: opposite jets can be noticed. However, there is clear indication
305: of the existence of a poorly developed or degenerated counterjet.
306: Compact H$\alpha$ emission at the upper part of the map is from the shocked
307: structure located on the opposite side of the prominent jet.}
308:
309: \figcaption[f3.eps]{The H$\alpha$ emission from the jet driving source.
310: Note the red-displaced absorption component in the stellar continuum emission.
311: %The inset is a position-velocity plot of the features detected
312: %around H$\alpha$. Intense H$\alpha$ emission
313: %at the upper part of the inset is again from the shocked structure at the
314: %opposite side of the jet.
315: }
316:
317: %%%UCP%%%
318: \newpage
319: \plotone{f1.ps}
320: \newpage
321: \plotone{f2.eps}
322: \newpage
323: \plotone{f3.eps}
324: %\plotone{f3b.eps}
325:
326: \end{document}
327:
328: