1:
2: \documentclass{ws-mpla}
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{The Unified Equation of State for Dark Matter and Dark Energy}
8: \author{WEI WANG, {\footnotesize YUANXING GUI\thanks{
9: Corresponding author},} \\
10: %EndAName
11: SUHONG ZHANG, GUANGHAI GUO, YING SHAO}
12: \address{Department of Physics, Dalian University of Technology,\\
13: Dalian 116024, P. R. China\\
14: thphys@dlut.edu.cn} \maketitle
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17: We assume that dark matter and dark energy satisfy the unified
18: equation of state: $p=B(z)\rho$, with $p=p_{dE}$,
19: $\rho=\rho_{dm}+\rho_{dE}$, where the pressure of dark matter
20: $p_{dm}=0$ has been taken into account. A special function
21: $B=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }}$ is presented, which can well
22: describe the evolution of the universe. In this model, the
23: universe will end up with a Big Rip. By further simple analysis,
24: we know other choices of the function $B$ can also describe the
25: universe but lead to a different doomsday.
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: \keywords{the unified equation of state; dark matter; dark energy}
29:
30: \markboth{Wei Wang and Yuanxing Gui} {The Unified Equation of
31: State for Dark Matter and Dark Energy}
32:
33: \address{Department of Physics, Dalian University of Technology\\
34: Dalian 116024, P.R.China\\
35: guiyx@dlut.edu.cn}
36:
37: \ccode{PACS Nos.: 98.80.-k}
38:
39: \section{Introduction}
40:
41: The astronomical observations indicate that the expansion of our
42: universe accelerates\cite{1}. This accelerated expansion is
43: ascribed to a mysterious component with the negative pressure
44: called dark energy that comprises about $\frac{2}{3}$ of the
45: energy density of the universe. The simplest model for the dark
46: energy is a cosmological constant. There are many more complex
47: models proposed attempting to explain dark energy either as a
48: dynamic substance(for example Quintessence\cite{2},
49: Phantom\cite{3}) or via some forms of modified gravitational
50: theory perhaps related to extra dimensions and string
51: physics\cite{4}. Now the unified models for dark energy and dark
52: matter have been also discussed\cite{5} and characteristics of
53: some kinds of models are summarized in Alam's works\cite{6}.
54:
55: The research team of A. G. Riess et al.\cite{7} have pinpointed
56: the transition epoch from matter domination to dark energy
57: domination when cosmic expansion began to accelerate and also
58: indicated the transition between the two epochs is constrained to
59: be at $z_{T}=0.46\pm 0.13 $. It is therefore pressing that an
60: independent model of dark energy can be employed to elaborate the
61: present phenomena and trace back to the past and even forecast the
62: future evolution. To attain this aim, in this paper we present the
63: simplest
64: linear equation of state $p=B(z)\rho $, with $p=p_{dE}$, $%
65: \rho=\rho_{dm}+\rho_{dE}$, where the pressure of dark matter
66: $p_{dm}=0$ has been taken into account. This model can predict a
67: smooth transition from nonrelativistic matter(including both
68: baryons and dark matter) domination phase to dark energy
69: domination one in a natural way. Directed by this objective, the
70: paper is organized as follows. The central part of the paper is
71: Sec.~2 in which the two constraints in choosing the function $B$
72: are discussed and a suitable function $B=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha
73: }}$ is proposed. From the function some parameters of the universe
74: are derived. In Sec.~3 the conclusion is put up that only by
75: choosing a suitable function $B$ can the unified equation of state
76: proposed describe the evolution of the universe.
77:
78: \section{Analysis and deduction}
79:
80: It is known that our universe begins with the big bang. The
81: radiation should have been the dominant contribution to the total
82: density of the universe when the redshift $z$ was more than
83: $10^{4}$ in the early universe. The density of radiation decreased
84: and quickly approached $0$ with the evolution of the universe.
85: However, the density of nonrelativistic matter(including both
86: baryons and dark matter) increased and became the dominant
87: contribution to the universe. Subsequently, the density of
88: nonrelativistic matter decreased and that of dark energy increased
89: and at the same time cosmic expansion transited from deceleration
90: to acceleration, the process of which is discussed in this paper.
91:
92: We assume dark matter and dark energy satisfy the unified equation of state $%
93: p=B(z)\rho$ with $p=p_{dm}+p_{dE}$, $\rho=\rho_{dm}+\rho_{dE}$, where the
94: pressure of dark matter and that of dark energy satisfy respectively: $%
95: p_{dm}=0$, $p_{dE}=\omega _{dE}\rho _{dE}$($\omega _{dE}<0$). Because of the
96: above equations and the evolution of our universe, there are some
97: constraints for function $B$ proposed:
98: \begin{romanlist}[(ii)]
99: \item Function $B$ should maintain negative value forever and vary
100: in the range ($\omega_{dE}$, $0$).
101: \item For $z>0$, function $B$
102: should have been approaching $0$ but not equaling to $0$ for a
103: long time in the high redshift and be smaller and smaller as
104: redshift becomes low.
105: \end{romanlist}
106:
107: In terms of the two constraints proposed above, we give a concrete
108: form of function $B$ as $B=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }} $ and we can
109: obtain the solutions of some parameters including fractional
110: components, deceleration-acceleration transition, the equation of
111: state of dark energy, which are coincident with the evolution of
112: the universe and consistent with the present astrophysical
113: observations.
114:
115: For a spatially flat FRW universe, Friedmann equation can be written as:
116: \begin{equation}
117: H^{2}=\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho _{tot}\,. \label{equ1}
118: \end{equation}
119: Also the continuity equation:
120: \begin{equation}
121: \dot{\rho}_{tot}=-3H(p_{tot}+\rho _{tot})\,, \label{equ2}
122: \end{equation}
123: has to be taken into account, where $\rho _{tot}$ is the total
124: energy density
125: of our universe $\rho _{tot}=\rho _{b}+\rho _{dm}+\rho _{dE}=\rho _{b}+\rho $%
126: , where subscript $``b\textquotedblright $ denotes baryons. So
127: $\rho _{b}$ is the density of baryons and Eq.~(\ref{equ2}) is
128: separated into two parts:
129: \begin{equation}
130: \dot{\rho}_{b}=-3H(p_{b}+\rho _{b})\,, \label{equ3}
131: \end{equation}
132: \begin{equation}
133: \dot{\rho}=-3H(p+\rho )\,. \label{equ4}
134: \end{equation}
135: If the function $B(z)=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }}$, where $A$,
136: $\alpha $ are the positive real constants, substituting
137: $p=B(z)\rho $ to Eq.~(\ref{equ4}) then
138: \begin{equation}
139: \dot{\rho}=-3H(-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }}\rho +\rho )\,.
140: \label{equ5}
141: \end{equation}
142: So the density of dark matter and dark energy evolves with the
143: redshift as
144: \begin{equation}
145: \rho =C(1+z)^{3}e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}}\,,
146: \label{equ6}
147: \end{equation}
148: where $C$ is an integral constant. Using the constraint condition
149: of $z=0$ makes it satisfy:
150: \begin{equation}
151: \rho _{0}=Ce^{\frac{3A}{\alpha }}\,, \label{equ7}
152: \end{equation}
153: where $\rho _{0}$ is the present density of dark matter and dark energy and
154: today's evaluated quantities will hereafter denoted by the label $%
155: ``0\textquotedblright $, and
156: \begin{equation}
157: \rho _{c0}=\rho _{tot0}=\rho _{0}+\rho
158: _{b0}=\frac{3H_{0}^{2}}{8\pi G}\,, \label{equ8}
159: \end{equation}
160: is how the present critical energy density is defined. Replacing Eq.~(\ref%
161: {equ8}) in Eq.~(\ref{equ7}), we obtain:
162: \begin{equation}
163: C=(\rho _{c0}-\rho _{b0})e^{-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}\,. \label{equ9}
164: \end{equation}
165: The density of baryons and that of dark matter are respectively recognized
166: as:
167: \begin{equation}
168: \rho _{b}=\rho _{b0}(1+z)^{3}\,, \label{equ10}
169: \end{equation}
170: \begin{equation}
171: \rho _{dm}=\rho _{dm0}(1+z)^{3}\,. \label{equ11}
172: \end{equation}
173: So the total density takes the form:
174: \begin{equation}
175: \rho _{tot}=(\rho _{c0}-\rho _{b0})(1+z)^{3}e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha
176: (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}+\rho _{b0}(1+z)^{3}\,,
177: \label{equ12}
178: \end{equation}
179: and the density of dark energy can be obtained by
180: Eqs.~(\ref{equ10}), (\ref {equ11}) and (\ref{equ12}) as:
181: \begin{equation}
182: \rho _{dE}=(\rho _{c0}-\rho _{b0})(1+z)^{3}e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha
183: (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}-\rho _{dm0}(1+z)^{3}\,.
184: \label{equ13}
185: \end{equation}
186: One can express the fractional energy densities $\Omega _{b}$,
187: $\Omega _{dm}$ , $\Omega _{dE}$ as
188: \begin{equation}
189: \ \Omega _{b}=\frac{\ \Omega _{b0}}{(1-\Omega
190: _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha
191: }}+\Omega _{b0}}\,, \label{equ14}
192: \end{equation}
193: \begin{equation}
194: \ \Omega _{dm}=\frac{\ \Omega _{dm0}}{(1-\Omega
195: _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha
196: }}+\Omega _{b0}}\,, \label{equ15}
197: \end{equation}
198: \begin{equation}
199: \ \Omega _{dE}=\frac{\ (1-\Omega _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha
200: (1+z)^{\alpha }}- \frac{3A}{\alpha }}-\Omega _{dm0}}{(1-\Omega
201: _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha
202: }}+\Omega _{b0}}\,, \label{equ16}
203: \end{equation}
204: where $\Omega _{b0}=\frac{\rho _{b0}}{\rho _{c0}}$, $\Omega
205: _{dm0}=\frac{ \rho _{dm0}}{\rho _{c0}}$.
206:
207: Assuming $A=0.7$ and $\alpha =1.81$, the fractional energy
208: densities are only the functions of redshift with the prior of
209: $\Omega _{b0}=0.04 $, $ \Omega _{dm0}=0.3 $. The assumption is
210: still used in the following calculation.
211:
212: \begin{figure}[th]
213: \centerline{\psfig{file=2tu.eps,width=5.5in}} \vspace*{8pt}
214: \caption{A: The fractional energy densities as the functions of
215: redshift. B: The equation of state of dark energy $\protect\omega
216: _{dE}$ as the function of redshift. The priors $\Omega
217: _{b0}=0.04$, $\Omega _{dm0}=0.3$ have been used.} \label{fig1}
218: \end{figure}
219:
220: The results of the three fractional energy densities at the
221: present time are compatible with observations using the priors of
222: $\Omega _{b0}=0.04$, $\Omega _{dm0}=0.3$. Meanwhile, according to
223: FIG.~1A we know that the past evolution of baryons, dark matter
224: and dark energy is consistent with what is recognized. The
225: cosmology will end up with a Big Rip in that the universe will be
226: filled with dark energy in future. The conclusion is shared in
227: many literatures(e.g.\cite{8}).
228:
229: It follows that the equation of state parameter of dark energy can be
230: obtained as:
231: \begin{equation}
232: \omega _{dE}=\frac{p_{dE}}{\rho _{dE}}=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }}\frac{%
233: (1-\Omega _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}}{%
234: (1-\Omega _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha
235: }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}-\ \Omega _{dm0}}\,. \label{equ17}
236: \end{equation}
237: Using Eq. (\ref{equ17}) we can plot $\omega _{dE}$ as the function
238: of redshift(see FIG.~1B). The equation of state of dark energy is
239: $\omega _{dE0}\approx-1.019$ at present. Tracing back to the past,
240: the larger the redshift is, the more the density of
241: nonrelativistic matter(including both baryons and dark matter) is
242: and the more adjacent to $0$ the equation of state of dark energy
243: $\omega _{dE}$ is, i.e., we realize an evolving dark energy with
244: the equation of state being below $-1$ around the present epoch
245: evolved from $\omega _{dE}>-1$ in the past\cite{9}. This is
246: another consistency between our theory and the evolution.
247:
248: The dominance of the dark energy leads to the acceleration
249: expansion of our universe. The increasing density of dark energy
250: is the reason why expansion of our universe transited from
251: deceleration to acceleration. Our theory describes the transition.
252: The deduction is as follows:
253: \begin{equation}
254: q=-\frac{\ddot{a}a}{\dot{a}^{2}}=-\frac{\ddot{a}}{aH^{2}}\,,
255: \label{equ18}
256: \end{equation}%
257: where $q$ is the deceleration parameter. Using Eqs.~(\ref{equ1}), (\ref{equ6}%
258: ) and (\ref{equ9}), the Friedmann equation may be rewritten as
259: \begin{equation}
260: H^{2}=\frac{8\pi G}{3}(\rho _{c0}-\rho
261: _{b0})(1+z)^{3}e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha
262: }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}+\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho _{b0}(1+z)^{3}\,.
263: \label{equ19}
264: \end{equation}%
265: Differentiating Eq.~(\ref{equ19}) with respect to time and
266: changing variable from the cosmic time to the redshift, we finally
267: obtain:
268: \begin{equation}
269: \frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{1}{2}H^{2}+\frac{3A(\rho _{c0}-\rho _{b0})}{%
270: 2(1+z)^{\alpha -3}}e^{\frac{3A}{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha
271: }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}\,. \label{equ20}
272: \end{equation}%
273: Combining the above two equations, we find that $q$ satisfies
274: \begin{equation}
275: q=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{3A}{2(1+z)^{\alpha }}\frac{\ (1-\Omega _{b0})e^{\frac{3A%
276: }{\alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}}{(1-\Omega _{b0})e^{\frac{3A}{%
277: \alpha (1+z)^{\alpha }}-\frac{3A}{\alpha }}+\Omega _{b0}}\,.
278: \label{equ21}
279: \end{equation}%
280: From this expression, we get the present deceleration parameter $%
281: q_{0}=-0.508$ according to $z=0$ and the transition redshift $z_{T}\approx
282: 0.449$ according to $q=0$. The deceleration parameter as the function of
283: redshift is shown in FIG.2.
284: \begin{figure}[th]
285: \centerline{\psfig{file=q.eps,width=3.0in}} \vspace*{8pt}
286: \caption{The deceleration parameter $q$ as the function of redshift. The
287: priors $\Omega _{b0}=0.04$, $\Omega _{dm0}=0.3$ have been used.}
288: \label{fig2}
289: \end{figure}
290:
291: From above deduction, we know the acceleration of our cosmic
292: expansion will be faster and faster when
293: $B=-\frac{A}{(1+z)^{\alpha }}$ is chosen. As a result of smaller
294: and smaller $B$, $q$ and $\omega_{dE}$ will also be smaller and
295: smaller and even will approach negative infinity from FIG.~3. It
296: is inevitable that the universe will end up with a Big Rip. On the
297: condition that choosing another function based on the above two
298: constraints and using another symbol: $B_{2}=-0.7exp(-z^{2})$ and
299: ($z>-1$) in order to distinguish the two functions, we can still
300: obtain the solutions coincident with the past and the present
301: observational data because of the semblable curves of the two
302: functions in $z>0$. But the fate of the universe will be
303: different. New function $B_{2}$ is axial symmetry. Smaller $z$
304: will lead to larger $B_{2}$ in future which also reflects the
305: tendency of the equation of state of dark energy. Both of the
306: densities of baryons, dark matter will approach small quantities,
307: so we think that the total energy density approximately equal to
308: the density of dark energy. Because of
309: \begin{equation}
310: q=-\frac{\ddot{a}a}{\dot{a}^{2}}=-\frac{\ddot{a}}{aH^{2}}=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3%
311: }{2}\frac{p_{tot}}{\rho _{tot}}\,,
312: \end{equation}%
313: one obtains
314: \begin{equation}
315: q\approx\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{2}B_{2}\,.
316: \end{equation}%
317: When $B_{2}>-\frac{1}{3}$, $q>0$, the expansion of the universe
318: will come back to deceleration from acceleration. We don't discuss
319: the detailed deduction owing to the difficulty of the integral of
320: Gaussian function.
321: \begin{figure}[th]
322: \centerline{\psfig{file=twof.eps,width=3.0in}} \vspace*{8pt}
323: \caption{The contrast of two kinds of the choices of function $B$}
324: \label{fig3}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: As shown in the above discussion, the results can be obtained which are in
328: agreement with the observational data of the past time and the present time
329: as long as we choose the function $B$ in terms of the above two analyzed
330: constraints. At the same time the tendency of B in the range $-1<z<0$
331: determines the fate of the universe. So it is possible to find a suitable
332: function to describe the evolution of the universe from the early time to
333: the future.
334:
335: \section{conclusion}
336:
337: In summary, this paper considers that the utilization of a unified
338: linear equation of state can describe the history of the universe
339: and its evolution of the future. It is worth highlighting that we
340: don't simulate function $B$ without foundation but based on some
341: remarkable constraints. Analyzing the constraints of the choice of
342: the function $B$ in terms of the evolution of our universe and
343: choosing the appropriate function $B$ according to the
344: constraints, the evolution of our universe can be obtained in
345: consistence with what is recognized. Both dark matter and dark
346: energy are considered the essential but missing pieces in the
347: cosmic jiasaw puzzle\cite{10}. But the nature of either dark
348: matter or dark energy is currently unknown. We propose this
349: model-independent unified equation of state which can be utilized
350: to forecast the nature of dark matter and dark energy possibly.
351:
352: \section*{Acknowledgments}
353:
354: We are grateful to Prof. Hongya Liu, Dr. Lixin Xu and Mr. Hongjun
355: Chen for helpful discussions. This work is supported by National
356: Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant NO.10275008.
357:
358: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
359: \bibitem{1} C.~L.~Bennett \textit{et al.}, {\it Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.} \textbf{%
360: 148}, 1 (2003)
361:
362: \bibitem{2} K. Freese \textit{et al.}, {\it Nucl.Phys.} \textbf{B287}, 797 (1987);
363: P. J. E Peebles and B. Ratra, {\it ApJ} \textbf{325}, L17 (1988)
364:
365: \bibitem{3} Pedro F. Gonzalez-Diaz and Carmen L. Siguenza, {\it
366: Nucl.Phys.}
367: \textbf{B697}, 363 (2004)
368:
369: \bibitem{4} L. Mersini, M. Bastero-Gil, and P. Kanti, {\it PRD} \textbf{64},
370: 043508 (2001); K. Freese and M. Lewis, {\it Phys.Lett.B}
371: \textbf{540}, 1 (2002)
372:
373: \bibitem{5} M. C. Bento and O. Bertolami, {\it PRD} \textbf{70},
374: 083519 (2004)
375:
376: \bibitem{6} Ujjaini Alam \textit{et al.}, {\it Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc} \textbf{347},
377: L47 (2004)
378:
379: \bibitem{7} A. G. Riess \textit{et al.}, {\it Astrophys.J.} \textbf{607},
380: 665 (2004)
381:
382: \bibitem{8} Shin'ichi Nojiri, Sergei D. Odintsov, {\it Phys.Lett.} \textbf{B595},
383: 1 (2004)
384:
385: \bibitem{9} Bo Feng, Xiulian Wang, and Xinmin Zhang, astro-ph/0404224
386:
387: \bibitem{10} Varun Sahni, astro-ph/0403324
388: \end{thebibliography}
389:
390: \end{document}
391: