1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{/home/luisfr/aastex/aastex52/aastex}
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
6: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7:
8: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
9:
10: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
11:
12: \slugcomment{Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal (Letters)}
13:
14: \shorttitle{Proper Motions of the BN Object and the I Radio Source}
15: %\shortauthors{Rodr\'\i guez et al.}
16:
17: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
18: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{Proper Motions of the BN Object and the I Radio Source
23: in Orion: Where and When Did BN Become a Runaway Star?}
24:
25: \author{Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez}
26: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM,
27: Apdo. Postal 3-72, Morelia, Michoac\'an, 58089 M\'exico}
28: \email{l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
29:
30: \author{Arcadio Poveda}
31: \affil{Instituto de Astronom\'\i a, UNAM,
32: Apdo. Postal 70-264, M\'exico, D. F., 04510 M\'exico}
33: \email{poveda@servidor.unam.mx}
34:
35: \author{Susana Lizano}
36: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM,
37: Apdo. Postal 3-72, Morelia, Michoac\'an, 58089 M\'exico}
38: \email{s.lizano@astrosmo.unam.mx}
39:
40: \and
41:
42: \author{Christine Allen}
43: \affil{Instituto de Astronom\'\i a, UNAM,
44: Apdo. Postal 70-264, M\'exico, D. F., 04510 M\'exico}
45: \email{allen@astroscu.unam.mx}
46:
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: We present absolute astrometry of the core of the Orion molecular cloud,
51: made with Very Large Array archive data taken over the last two decades.
52: Our analysis reveals that both the BN object and the radio source I
53: have proper motions: the BN object has a proper motion of
54: $12.6 \pm 0.6$ mas yr$^{-1}$ (corresponding to a velocity
55: of $27 \pm 1$ km s$^{-1}$ at an adopted
56: distance of 450 pc) to the northwest, while the radio source I
57: has a proper motion of
58: $5.6 \pm 0.7$ mas yr$^{-1}$ (corresponding to
59: a velocity of
60: $12 \pm 2$ km s$^{-1}$) to the southeast. The
61: motion of the two sources is nearly antiparallel,
62: diverging from a point in between them, where they were located about
63: 500 years ago. These results suggest that the BN object and the radio source I
64: were part of a multiple young stellar system that disintegrated
65: in the recent past.
66:
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \keywords{astrometry --- ISM: individual (\objectname{Orion}) ---
70: radio continuum: stars --- stars: pre-main sequence}
71:
72: \section{Introduction}
73:
74: The dynamical decay of triple and multiple young stellar systems, in which
75: one or more member stars are ejected from the group, is expected to
76: have profound effects in the star formation process (Reipurth 2000).
77: However, very few clear examples of fast-moving, runaway objects have been found
78: in association with regions of star formation.
79:
80: Perhaps the best example of a young runaway star is
81: the Becklin-Neugebauer (BN) object in the Orion
82: region. This bright 2 $\mu$m source (Becklin \& Neugebauer 1967)
83: was first detected as a radio source by Moran et al. (1983).
84: From radio data taken from 1986.3 to 1995.0, Plambeck et al. (1995)
85: discovered that it exhibited a velocity in the plane of the sky of
86: $\sim 50~km~s^{-1}$ to the NW. In a recent study, Tan (2004)
87: proposed that the BN object was ejected from the Orion Trapezium
88: some 4000 yr ago.
89: However, the possible existence of another runaway star (JW451; Jones \& Walker 1988)
90: recently ejected from the
91: Orion Trapezium (Poveda et al. 2005) led us to revise the origin
92: of BN's large motions.
93: The BN object, the Kleinmann-Low nebula and
94: their immediate environment are very suggestive of another trapezium similar
95: to the visible Orion Trapezium, but still embedded in an obscuring envelope. In fact, the 20 $\mu$m
96: brightness contours of the BN-KL area (Gezari, Backman, \& Werner 1998) show a morphology
97: strongly reminiscent of that of the Orion Trapezium, particularly as it should have
98: looked at 20 $\mu$m before the UV radiation from $\theta^1$ Orionis C had ionized and cleared the
99: obscuring envelope. Also, the projected dimensions (d $\sim$ 15" ) and the bolometric
100: luminosity of the BN-KL complex ($L \simeq 10^5~L_\odot$) are similar to those of the Orion
101: Trapezium. Moreover, a number of compact radio and
102: infrared sources are detected in the BN-KL region (see Fig. 6 of Gezari et al. 1998
103: and Fig. 2 of Shuping, Morris, \& Bally 2004),
104: indicating that there are many fainter stars deeply embedded there.
105: % in the BN-KL region.
106: %, strengthening
107: % the similarity to the Trapezium cluster.
108: Furthermore, from a high resolution study of the region,
109: Shuping et al. (2004) find the star density in the region
110: to be as high as, or even higher than,
111: that of the Trapezium cluster. The strong similarities between the BN-KL complex
112: and the Orion Trapezium motivated us to hypothesize that the former environment is also a
113: propitious place to accelerate a runaway star like BN. In the
114: following we examine observationally the possibility that the BN object might have been accelerated
115: by dynamical interactions occurring within a young multiple stellar system,
116: still embedded in the obscured BN-KL region.
117:
118: \section{Observations}
119:
120: We searched in the archives of the
121: Very Large Array (VLA) of the National
122: Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO)\footnote{NRAO is a facility of the
123: National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by
124: Associated Universities, Inc.} for observations of the Orion BN
125: region taken with high angular resolution
126: ($0\rlap.{''}3$ or better), good coverage of the \sl (u,v) \rm
127: plane, and that were made using as phase calibrator the nearby
128: ($\simeq 1\rlap.^\circ6$) quasar 0541-056 (J2000 equinox).
129: We obtained data with these characteristics for five different
130: epochs: 1985.05, 1995.56, 2000.86, 2000.87, and 2002.25 (see Table 1).
131: To obtain reliable absolute astrometry, we used for all epochs
132: the most recent refined position of 0541-056 for 2000.25
133: ($\alpha(J2000) = 05^h~ 41^m~ 38\rlap.^{s}083;
134: \delta(J2000) = -05^\circ~41'~49\rlap.{''}428$).
135: We found significant proper motions only in the BN object and
136: in the radio source I. The observations of the nearby bright and
137: compact sources A, D, G, and H (see Garay et al. 1987 and Felli et al.
138: 1993 for the nomenclature)
139: did not show significant proper motions in right ascension or declination
140: at a typical 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of 2-3 milliarcsecond per year (mas yr$^{-1}$).
141: Since our data coverage had a large gap between 1985.05 and 1995.56,
142: we used high angular resolution observations taken on 1991.67 and 1991.68
143: (see Table 1) using different phase calibrators (0501-019 and 0530+135 on
144: both epochs). Assuming that, on the average, the sources A, D, G, and H
145: did not have proper motions, we corrected systematically all positions
146: in the 1991.67 and 1991.68
147: images to make them consistent with the other epochs.
148: In summary, we analyzed seven epochs taken from 1985 to 2002, with
149: good sampling across this time period.
150: The main observational parameters of these observations are
151: listed in Table 1. All the observations were made in the most extended
152: A configuration and those of 2000.86 and 2000.87 included the Pie Town link, that
153: provides improved angular resolution.
154:
155: The continuum data were edited and calibrated following
156: the VLA standard procedures. The data for
157: 1985.05, 1991.68, 1995.56, 2000.87 were self-calibrated,
158: while those for 1991.67, 2000.86, and 2002.25, when the continuum was
159: in all cases observed simultaneously with bright maser emission, were
160: cross-calibrated, using the self-calibrated maser solutions
161: to calibrate the continuum. Cleaned maps were
162: obtained using the task IMAGR of AIPS and the ROBUST parameter set to 0.
163:
164: \section{Results}
165:
166: Figure 1 shows the main result of our analysis. By comparing the first and
167: last epoch of the set of seven observations, we clearly see that
168: both the BN object and the radio source I have proper motions,
169: diverging from a point between them.
170: In Figure 2 we show the right ascension and declination of both
171: sources as a function of time.
172: The positions were determined from a
173: linearized least-squares fit to a Gaussian ellipsoid function using the task
174: IMFIT of AIPS.
175: The error in position for each observation
176: was taken to be the sum in quadrature of the relative error
177: of the source in the given image (proportional to the angular
178: resolution over the signal-to-noise
179: ratio) and a systematic error, taken to be 10 mas
180: in right ascension and declination at all epochs.
181:
182: The absolute proper motions and the position angles of motion
183: are given in Table 2. We conclude that the BN object is moving
184: to the northwest with a velocity in the plane of the sky of
185: $27 \pm 1~km~s^{-1}$, while the radio source I is moving to
186: the southeast with a velocity in the plane of the sky of
187: $12 \pm 2~km~s^{-1}$.
188: If the BN object and the radio source I were in the past part of a multiple stellar
189: system
190: that became disintegrated some 500 years ago (see below),
191: we expect that the ratio of velocities
192: in the plane of the sky, a factor of about 2.3, applies also to the radial velocities.
193: As discussed by Plambeck et al. (1995) and Tan (2004), the ambient molecular
194: cloud has an LSR velocity of about 9 km s$^{-1}$, while the velocity of the
195: BN object is $\simeq$21 km s$^{-1}$, giving a radial velocity
196: of $\simeq$+12 km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the
197: ambient cloud.
198: On the other hand, the mean velocity of the SiO maser associated with
199: the radio source I is $\simeq$5 km s$^{-1}$, giving a radial velocity
200: of $\simeq$-4 km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the
201: ambient cloud. The ratio of radial velocities is $\sim$3 consistent with
202: the value of 2.3 determined from the velocities in the plane of
203: the sky. It should be pointed out, however,
204: that the SiO maser emission traces the interaction of a fast jet with
205: the surrounding medium and that the true radial velocity of the
206: source I may be difficult to recover from the velocity of the SiO
207: masers. We conclude that the BN object moves with a total velocity
208: of $\simeq$30 km s$^{-1}$, receding with respect to the
209: molecular cloud , while the radio
210: source I moves with a total velocity of $\simeq$13 km s$^{-1}$, approaching with
211: respect to the molecular cloud.
212: The possibility that both the BN object and the radio source I had significant proper
213: motions had been mentioned by Plambeck et al. (1995), Tan (2004), and
214: Bally \& Zinnecker (2005), but this is the first time that direct
215: observational evidence is presented.
216:
217: The relative astrometry between the BN object and the radio source I
218: is very accurate, since it does not include the estimate for the
219: systematic errors
220: that have to be taken into account for the absolute positioning of the sources.
221: We obtain
222: $\mu_\alpha = -12.1 \pm 0.5~ mas~yr^{-1}$ and
223: $\mu_\delta = 14.0 \pm 0.5~ mas~ yr^{-1}$, corresponding to
224: a total proper motion of $18.5 \pm 0.5~ mas~ yr^{-1}$
225: toward a position angle of $-40\rlap.^\circ8 \pm 1\rlap.^\circ5$,
226: in excellent agreement with the determination of
227: Tan (2004) from independent millimeter observations
228: ($18.1 \pm 2.2~ mas~yr^{-1}$ at a PA of $-37\rlap.^\circ7 \pm 5\rlap.^\circ0$).
229: Extrapolating the velocity vector
230: backward and assuming no acceleration, we find that the BN object and
231: the radio source I were within $0\rlap.{''}5$ of each other
232: (see Figure 3)
233: around epoch $1480 \pm 30$ (that is, about 500 years ago).
234:
235: \section{Discussion}
236:
237: We will consider two possibilities for the origin of the observed motions
238: of the BN object and source I. First, we will discuss the possibility
239: that they formed a triple system which interacted 500 years ago,
240: forming a very close binary (source I) and the runaway BN object.
241: To examine this possibility, we need
242: to estimate the mass of both objects.
243: From mid-infrared imaging of the Orion BN/KL region
244: Gezari et al. (1998) found a luminosity for
245: the bright core of the BN object of
246: 2500 $L_\odot$ which corresponds to
247: a central star with a mass
248: $M_{BN} \sim 8~ M_\odot$ (Schaller et al. 1992).
249: On the other hand, if the ionized HII region around BN is
250: optically thin at $\nu \sim 216$ GHz (as proposed by
251: Plambeck et al. 1995) one
252: obtains an ionizing photon rate of
253: $\dot S \sim 4 \times 10^{45}~ {\rm s}^{-1}$ (Mezger, Smith, \& Churchwell
254: 1974) that corresponds
255: to $M_{BN} \sim 12.6 ~ M_\odot$ (Diaz-Miller, Franco, \& Shore 1998).
256: For $8~ M_\odot < M_{BN} < ~ 12.6~ M_\odot$,
257: conservation of linear momentum of the original triple system implies
258: that for the velocity ratio of 2.3 between the BN object and source I,
259: the total mass of source I should be in the range
260: $18 M_\odot < M_I < 29 M_\odot$. If each member of the binary system in I
261: has half the mass, the total luminosity of this source would be
262: in the range $L_I \sim 8,300 - 4 \times 10^4 ~ L_\odot$.
263: If the primary dominates the mass, the maximum luminosity of
264: source I could be as large as $L_I \sim 10^5 L_\odot$, comparable
265: with the total luminosity of the region. Nevertheless, this latter
266: configuration is dynamically less favorable for ejection.
267:
268: Source I is detected only in radio continuum emission,
269: and it is not detected even
270: at mid-IR wavelengths (e.g., Plambeck et al. 1995;
271: Greenhill et al 2004). Luminosities of the order of $10^4~ L_\odot$
272: are expected due to its association with SiO masers (Menten \& Reid 1995).
273: If the ionized region is optically thin at $\nu > 100$ GHz
274: (see Figure 2 of Beuther et al. 2004) one can estimate the
275: mm flux expected from the hypothetical binary system.
276: If the binary system has 2 components each with a mass of the order
277: of $9~ M_\odot$, the predicted optically-thin free-free flux
278: density at $230$ GHz is
279: $ S_\nu \sim 32~ mJy$, consistent with a turnover frequency of 100 GHz.
280: On the other hand, if the binary components have masses
281: larger that $14~ M_\odot$ (using the upper limit of $M_{BN}$ or
282: assuming that the primary dominates)
283: the predicted flux is $ > 1~ Jy$, i.e., at least
284: a factor of 30 greater than the flux expected from a 100 GHz turnover
285: frequency. In the latter case,
286: the observed relatively weak continuum emission could be due to
287: the presence of an ionized jet
288: as in the case of IRAS~20126+4101 (Hofner et al. 1999) where
289: very high density circumstellar gas ``quenches'' the normal HII region.
290: The extinction to this source is estimated to
291: be very large, $A_V \sim 60 - 1000$ (Gezari et al. 1998; Beuther et al. 2004).
292: Thus, even a very luminous source could be hidden by the obscuring
293: envelope of source I.
294: It is important to emphasize that the results of Beuther et al. (2004)
295: are also consistent with a source that becomes optically thin at
296: much higher frequencies and that the free-free emission
297: of source I can be quite large in the sub-millimeter.
298:
299: As discussed above, 500 years ago, the BN object was within less
300: than 225 AU of source I,
301: consistent with both sources being members of a compact stellar group.
302: We now assume that the original triple system had a total negative energy given
303: by a fraction $\alpha$ of the final binding energy of the binary system in I,
304: $-\alpha (G M_p M_s)/2a$, where $M_p$ and $M_s$ are the masses
305: of the primary and secondary stars, respectively, and $a$ is the
306: semi-major axis of the binary.
307: Energy conservation implies that
308: $(a/ AU) = 47.5 (1-\alpha)f (1-f) (M_{BN} / 12.6~M_\odot)$,
309: where $f$ is the fraction of
310: the total mass of the primary.
311: For $f=1/2$ and $\alpha=0.1$,
312: the semi-major axis is in the range
313: $ 7~ AU < a < 11~ AU$ for the range for $M_{BN}$ discussed above,
314: resulting in a period $ 4~ {\rm yr} < P < 7~ {\rm yr}$.
315: The relative velocity of the stars at perihelion is
316: $v_p \sim \sqrt{G M_I / a}$, thus one expects
317: $ 40~ {\rm km~ s}^{-1} < v_p < 70 ~ {\rm km~ s}^{-1}$.
318: The space velocities of the BN object and the I source indicate
319: that their trajectories make an angle of only $\sim 21^\circ$ with respect
320: to the plane of the sky.
321: The mass ratio of the binary
322: components and
323: the angle of the orbital plane with respect to the sky are not
324: known. One could try to restrict these parameters looking for
325: evidence of velocity asymmetries or time variations
326: of the observed distribution of
327: velocity centroids of the SiO masers (Plambeck et al. 1990;
328: Menten \& Reid 1995).
329: However, as noted above,
330: the SiO maser emission may not trace
331: the true radial velocity of the source I.
332: The main implication of the triple system scenario is that source I has to be
333: a massive binary.
334:
335: A second possible scenario is that
336: instead of having a triple system, the interaction ocurred between several members
337: of a collapsing protostellar group, as modeled by Poveda, Ruiz, \& Allen (1967).
338: In this scenario, 500 years ago at the position of ejection
339: (see location of black asterisk in Figure 3), a bound multiple protostellar group experienced
340: close encounters which accelerated BN and I in opposite directions; in order to preserve
341: momentum and the initial negative energy one or more of the protostars,
342: possibly together with their disks and envelopes, recoiled as a tight binary and multiple
343: moving objects
344: (see Fig. 2 in Poveda et al. 1967). This would explain why the region where BN and I
345: were at minimum separation (see Figure 3), is at present
346: nearly devoid of infrared sources.
347: Note that at present the cluster of infrared sources IRc2 (ABCD)
348: is located within 1''-2'' to the northwest quadrant
349: of I, in the direction of the original position
350: of the proposed multiple cluster,
351: suggesting that the tight multiple
352: system was initially composed of BN, I and the IRc2 complex, and that
353: the n-body interaction
354: ejected I with a bound close companion together with the IRc2 objects,
355: thus explaining their relative positions at present.
356: This multiple source
357: scenario implies that the members of the IRc2 group should be participating in
358: the expansion with a sizeable fraction of the velocity of I. This possibility
359: can be tested with future astrometric observations of the IRc2 cluster in the
360: infrared. This multiple source scenario would allow source
361: I to be less massive
362: than in the triple source scenario described before.
363:
364: \acknowledgments
365:
366: LFR and SL are grateful to
367: CONACyT, M\'exico and DGAPA, UNAM for their support.
368: AP and CA are grateful to Alejandro
369: Hern\'andez for his assistance.
370:
371: \begin{thebibliography}{}
372:
373: \bibitem[]{a05} Bally, J., \& Zinnecker, H. 2005, AJ, in press
374:
375: \bibitem[]{be67} Becklin, E. E., \& Neugebauer, G. 1967, ApJ, 147, 799
376:
377: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616L..23B} Beuther, H., et al.\
378: 2004, ApJ, 616, L23
379:
380: \bibitem[Diaz-Miller et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...501..192D} Diaz-Miller, R.~I.,
381: Franco, J., \& Shore, S.~N.\ 1998, ApJ, 501, 192
382:
383: \bibitem[]{fe93} Felli, M., Churchwell, E., Wilson, T. L., \& Taylor, G. B.
384: 1993, A\&AS, 98, 137
385:
386: \bibitem[]{ga87} Garay, G., Moran, J. M., \& Reid, M. J. 1987, ApJ, 314, 535
387:
388: \bibitem[]{ge89} Genzel, R., \& Stutzki, J. 1989, ARA\&A, 27, 41
389:
390: \bibitem[]{ge98} Gezari, D. Y., Backman, D. E., \& Werner, M. W. 1998, ApJ, 509, 283
391:
392: \bibitem[Greenhill et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...605L..57G} Greenhill, L.~J.,
393: Gezari, D.~Y., Danchi, W.~C., Najita, J., Monnier, J.~D., \& Tuthill,
394: P.~G.\ 2004, ApJ, 605, L57
395:
396: \bibitem[]{ho99} Hofner, P., Cesaroni, R., Rodr\'\i guez, L. F., \& Mart\'\i, J.
397: 1999, A\&A, 345, L43
398:
399: \bibitem[]{jo88} Jones, B. F., \& Walker, M. F. 1988, AJ, 95, 1755
400:
401: \bibitem[Menten \& Reid(1995)]{1995ApJ...445L.157M} Menten, K.~M., \& Reid,
402: M.~J.\ 1995, ApJ, 445, L157
403:
404: \bibitem[Mezger et al.(1974)]{me74} Mezger, P. G., Smith, L. F., \& Churchwell, E.
405: 1974, A\&A, 32, 269
406:
407: \bibitem[]{mo83} Moran, J. M., Garay, G., Reid, M. J., Genzel, R. Wright,
408: M. C. H., \& Plambeck, R. L. 1983, ApJ, 271, L31
409:
410: \bibitem[Plambeck et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...348L..65P} Plambeck, R.~L.,
411: Wright, M.~C.~H., \& Carlstrom, J.~E.\ 1990, ApJ, 348, L65
412:
413: \bibitem[]{pl95} Plambeck, R. L., Wright, M. C. H., Mundy, L. G., \& Looney, L. W.
414: 1995, ApJ, 455, L189
415:
416: \bibitem[]{po67} Poveda, A., Ruiz, J., \& Allen, C., 1967, Bol. Obs. Tonantzintla y
417: Tacubaya, 4, 86 (http://www.astrosmo.unam.mx/\verb"~"luisfr/Poveda67.pdf)
418:
419: \bibitem[]{po05} Poveda, A., Allen, C., \& Hern\'andez, A. 2005, submitted to ApJ
420:
421: \bibitem[]{re00} Reipurth, B. 2000, AJ, 120, 3177
422:
423: \bibitem[Schaller et al.(1992)]{1992A&AS...96..269S} Schaller, G.,
424: Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A.\ 1992, A\&AS, 96, 269
425:
426: \bibitem[]{sh04} Shuping, R. Y., Morris, M., \& Bally, J. 2004, AJ, 128, 363
427:
428: \bibitem[]{ta04} Tan, J. C. 2004, ApJ, 607, L47
429:
430: \end{thebibliography}
431:
432: \clearpage
433:
434: \begin{figure}
435: \epsscale{1.1}
436: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
437: \caption{VLA images for 1985.05 (left; 2 cm) and 2002.25 (right; 7 mm) towards
438: the BN object and the I radio source.
439: The crosses mark the 1985.05 position of the sources.
440: Contours are -4, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 times
441: 0.13 (left) and 0.37 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (right), the rms of the respective
442: images. The half power contour of the synthesized beams
443: ($0\rlap.{''}16 \times 0\rlap.{''}13$; PA = $32^\circ$ for the
444: 2 cm image and $0\rlap.{''}06 \times 0\rlap.{''}05$; PA = $-34^\circ$
445: for the 7 mm image) are shown in the bottom right corner of each panel.
446: Note the proper motion of both sources.
447: \label{fig1}}
448: \end{figure}
449:
450: \clearpage
451:
452: \begin{figure}
453: \epsscale{1.0}
454: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
455: %\epsscale{2.2}
456: \plottwo{f2c.eps}{f2d.eps}
457: \caption{Proper motions in right ascension (left) and declination
458: (right) for the BN object (top) and the radio source I (bottom).
459: The dashed line is the least squares fit to the data.
460: See Table 2 for the parameters of this fit.
461: The position of the BN object for epoch 2002.25 is
462: $\alpha(J2000) = 05^h 35^m 14\rlap.^s1119; \delta(J2000) = -05^\circ 22' 22\rlap.{''}785$,
463: while that of the radio source I is
464: $\alpha(J2000) = 05^h 35^m 14\rlap.^s5119; \delta(J2000) = -05^\circ 22' 30\rlap.{''}530$.
465: \label{fig2}}
466: \end{figure}
467:
468: \clearpage
469:
470: \begin{figure}
471: \epsscale{1.0}
472: \plotone{f3xyzb.eps}
473: \caption{Relative positions of sources BN, I, and IRC2 (ABCD).
474: The green line with arrows at its ends
475: connects the present positions of the BN object and the I radio source.
476: The black asterisk is the estimated position for the original location of
477: the multiple system from which BN and I were ejected to their present
478: velocities 500 years ago (see text).
479: Taken from Figs. 1 and 2a of Shuping et al. (2004).
480: \label{fig3}}
481: \end{figure}
482:
483:
484: \clearpage
485:
486: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
487: \tablewidth{15.0cm}
488: \tablecaption{Archive Observations Analyzed}
489: \tablehead{
490: \colhead{} & \colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Wavelength}
491: & \colhead{Synthesized Beam} \\
492: \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{(cm)}
493: & \colhead{($\theta_M \times \theta_m; PA$)\tablenotemark{a}} \\
494: }
495: \startdata
496: 1985 Jan 19 (1985.05) & 14.940 & 2.0 & $0\rlap.{''}16 \times 0\rlap.{''}13;~+8^\circ$ \\
497: 1991 Sep 02 (1991.67) & 22.285 & 1.3 & $0\rlap.{''}10 \times 0\rlap.{''}10;~-16^\circ$ \\
498: 1991 Sep 06 (1991.68) & 8.440 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}25;~-55^\circ$ \\
499: 1995 Jul 22 (1995.56) & 8.440 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}22;~+34^\circ$ \\
500: 2000 Nov 10 (2000.86) & 43.165 & 0.7 & $0\rlap.{''}04 \times 0\rlap.{''}04;~-14^\circ$ \\
501: 2000 Nov 13 (2000.87) & 8.460 & 3.5 & $0\rlap.{''}24 \times 0\rlap.{''}14;~+27^\circ$ \\
502: 2002 Mar 31 (2002.25) & 43.215 & 0.7 & $0\rlap.{''}06 \times 0\rlap.{''}05;~-34^\circ$ \\
503: \enddata
504: \tablenotetext{a}{Major axis$\times$minor axis in arcsec; PA in degrees}
505:
506: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
507: \end{deluxetable}
508:
509: \clearpage
510:
511: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
512: \tablewidth{15.0cm}
513: \tablecaption{Absolute Proper Motions}
514: \tablehead{
515: \colhead{} & \colhead{$\mu_\alpha$} & \colhead{$\mu_\delta$}
516: & \colhead{$\mu_{total}$} & \colhead{Velocity\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{PA} \\
517: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{($mas~yr^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($mas~yr^{-1}$)}
518: & \colhead{($mas~yr^{-1}$)} &
519: \colhead{($km~s^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($^\circ$)} \\
520: }
521: \startdata
522: BN Object & $-8.4 \pm 0.6$ & $+9.4 \pm 0.6$ & $12.6 \pm 0.6$ & $27 \pm 1$ &
523: $-42^\circ \pm 3^\circ$ \\
524: I Radio Source & $+3.5 \pm 0.7$ & $-4.4 \pm 0.7$ & $5.6 \pm 0.7$ & $12 \pm 2$ &
525: $+141^\circ \pm 7^\circ$ \\
526: \enddata
527: \tablenotetext{a}{Velocity in the plane of the sky for an
528: assumed distance of 450 pc (Genzel \& Stutzki 1989).}
529:
530: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
531: \end{deluxetable}
532:
533: \clearpage
534:
535:
536: %\vfill\eject
537:
538: \end{document}
539:
540: %%
541: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
542: