1:
2: %%
3: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
4: %%
5: %% Modified 2004 January 9
6: %%
7: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
8: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
9:
10: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
11: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
12: %% any data that comes before this command.
13:
14: %% The command below calls the preprint style
15: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
16: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
17: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
18: %%
19: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,natbib}
45: \usepackage{natbib}
46:
47: \newcommand{\ubvri}{\protect\hbox{$U\!BV\!RI$} }
48: \newcommand{\bvri}{\protect\hbox{$BV\!RI$} }
49: \newcommand{\about}{$\sim$\!\!~}
50: \newcommand{\kms}{\,km\,s$^{-1}$}
51:
52: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
53:
54: %%\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
55:
56: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
57: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
58: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
59: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
60: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
61: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
62:
63: \shorttitle{Time Dilation of SN 1997ex}
64: \shortauthors{Foley et al.}
65:
66: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
67: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
68:
69: \begin{document}
70:
71: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
72: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
73: %% you desire.
74:
75: \title{A Definitive Measurement of Time Dilation in the Spectral
76: Evolution of the Moderate-Redshift Type Ia Supernova 1997ex}
77:
78: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
79: %% author and affiliation information.
80: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
81: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
82: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
83: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
84:
85: \author{Ryan J. Foley\altaffilmark{1}, Alexei
86: V. Filippenko\altaffilmark{1}, Douglas
87: C. Leonard\altaffilmark{2,3}, Adam
88: G. Riess\altaffilmark{4}, Peter Nugent\altaffilmark{5}, and Saul
89: Perlmutter\altaffilmark{5}}
90:
91: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley,
92: CA 94720-3411; email rfoley@astro.berkeley.edu,
93: alex@astro.berkeley.edu}
94: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, MS 105-24, California Institute
95: of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; email leonard@astro.caltech.edu}
96: \altaffiltext{3}{NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow.}
97: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
98: Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; email ariess@stsci.edu}
99: \altaffiltext{5}{Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720;
100: email saul@lbl.gov, nugent@lbl.gov}
101:
102: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
103: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
104: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
105: %% affiliation.
106:
107: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
108: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
109: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
110: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
111: %% editorial office after submission.
112:
113: \begin{abstract}
114: We have obtained high-quality Keck optical spectra at three epochs of
115: the Type Ia supernova 1997ex, whose redshift $z$ is 0.361. The elapsed
116: calendar time between the first two spectra was 24.88~d, and that
117: between the first and third spectra was 30.95~d. In an expanding
118: universe where $1 + z$ represents the factor by which space has
119: expanded between the emission and detection of light, the amount of
120: aging in the supernova rest frame should be a factor of $1 / (1 + z)$
121: smaller than the observed-frame aging; thus, we expect SN~1997ex to
122: have aged 18.28~d and 22.74~d between the first epoch and the second
123: and third epochs, respectively. The quantitative method for
124: determining the spectral-feature age of a SN~Ia, developed by
125: \citet{Riess97:timedilation}, reveals that the corresponding elapsed
126: times in the supernova rest frame were $16.97 \pm 2.75$~d and $18.01
127: \pm 3.14$~d, respectively. This result is inconsistent with no time
128: dilation with a significance level of 99.0\%, providing evidence
129: against ``tired light'' and other hypotheses in which no time dilation
130: is expected. Moreover, the observed timescale of spectral evolution is
131: inconsistent with that expected in the ``variable mass theory." The
132: result is within $\sim$1$\sigma$ of the aging expected from a
133: universe in which redshift is produced by cosmic expansion.
134: \end{abstract}
135:
136: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
137: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
138: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
139: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
140:
141: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
142: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
143: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
144: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
145: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
146: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
147: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
148: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
149: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
150: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
151: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
152: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
153:
154: \keywords{stars: supernovae: individual (\objectname{SN~1997ex}) ---
155: cosmology: observations}
156:
157: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
158: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
159: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
160: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
161: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
162: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
163: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
164: %% each reference.
165:
166: \section{Introduction}\label{s:intro}
167:
168: It has long been accepted that the redshifts of distant extragalactic
169: objects are caused predominantly by a cosmological expansion.
170: However, assertions that redshifts are not of cosmological origin are
171: occasionally made \citep[][and references therein]{Arp87,Burbidge04},
172: and alternative theories have been proposed that try to explain the
173: redshifts through other means such as ``tired light''
174: \citep[e.g.,][]{LaViolette86,Crawford99} and variable mass
175: \citep[e.g.,][]{Narlikar97}. Despite the predominance of the current
176: redshift paradigm, little direct observational evidence exists in
177: support of cosmological expansion \citep{Sandage91, Pahre96}.
178:
179: %*** Ryan, you might want to go to the Physics/Astron library to look
180: % up a hard copy of the La Violette reference, to make sure it really
181: % exists and is the correct one. I got it from Goldhaber et al. (2001)
182: % but have not actually looked it up myself.
183:
184: One prediction of cosmological expansion is that time will be dilated
185: by a factor of $1 + z$. Most astronomical phenomena evolve on very
186: long time scales, making a time dilation measurement infeasible.
187: However, supernovae (SNe), which rise and fall in brightness on a time
188: scale of a few months and are visible at moderate to high redshifts,
189: are ideal for this experiment. Indeed, decades ago \citet{Wilson39}
190: and \citet{Rust74} suggested that the light curves of SNe~Ia might be
191: used to detect the expected time dilation.
192:
193: \citet{Leibundgut96} showed that the light curve of SN~1995K ($z =
194: 0.479$) was abnormally wide for a SN~Ia if time dilation was ignored.
195: However, the light curve of SN~1995K compressed by a factor of
196: $1/(1+z)$ provided a good match to low-$z$ SN~Ia light curves. Since
197: the intrinsic light curves of SNe~Ia span a wide range (roughly
198: 0.5--1.6 times the normal width; e.g., \citealt{Goldhaber01}), the
199: null hypothesis of no time dilation was not completely ruled out.
200: \citet{Goldhaber01} showed that a sample of SN~Ia (which included 42
201: high-$z$ objects) light curves is consistent ($\sim$18$\sigma$)
202: with time dilation. However, this result is statistical, relying on
203: many objects which have already had their light-curve width modified
204: by an intrinsic ``stretch factor," and \citet{Narlikar97} contend that
205: the stretching is explained in the variable mass model. Because
206: there may be evolutionary factors that change a light curve's shape, a
207: positive time dilation result from the examination of {\it spectral
208: features} provides more compelling evidence for time dilation.
209: Moreover, for any individual SN~Ia, the intrinsic width is unknown, so
210: without assuming a $1+z$ dilation, the intrinsic width and dilation
211: can not be separated.
212:
213: In addition to the predictable nature of the SN~Ia light curve, the
214: SN~Ia spectrum also evolves in a very reliable way
215: \citep[e.g.,][]{Filippenko97}. As shown by
216: \citet{Riess97:timedilation}, the method of spectral-feature aging,
217: which compares a single-epoch spectrum to a catalog of comparison
218: spectra with known ages to determine a spectral-feature age (SFA), can
219: determine the age of a SN~Ia using a single spectrum; no light-curve
220: information is necessary. Using this method,
221: \citet{Riess97:timedilation} demonstrated that the multi-epoch spectra
222: of SN~1996bj are consistent with a $(1 + z)$-stretched temporal
223: evolution, and inconsistent with no time dilation at the 96.4\%
224: confidence level.
225:
226: Following the method of \citet{Riess97:timedilation}, we examine the
227: spectral evolution of SN~1997ex, a normal SN~Ia with $z = 0.361$, to
228: determine the SFA at the time the spectra were obtained. Comparing
229: this result to the time between epochs will result in a measurement of
230: the time dilation. We present the observations in
231: Section~\ref{s:observations}, and in Section~\ref{s:dilation} we
232: determine the rate at which SN~1997ex ages.
233: Section~\ref{s:discussion} discusses the results and implications of
234: our measurement.
235:
236: \section{Summary of Observations}\label{s:observations}
237:
238: SN~1997ex was discovered on 28 December 1997 (UT dates are used
239: throughout this paper) by the Supernova Cosmology Project
240: \citep{Nugent98}. Spectra were obtained on 1998 January 1, 1998
241: January 26, 1998 February 1, and 1998 March 5 using the Keck~II 10-m
242: telescope with the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer
243: \citep[LRIS;][]{Oke95}. We were able to determine accurate SFAs for
244: the first three epochs, but not for the fourth epoch.
245:
246: The original spectra were contaminated by host-galaxy light. Removal
247: of this light is important for creating accurate SFAs. We obtained a
248: Keck/LRIS spectrum of the host galaxy on 1999 January 21, approximately
249: a year after discovery of SN~1997ex,
250: with the intention of using these data for galaxy light
251: subtraction. During this time the SN had faded significantly; the SN
252: component of this latest spectrum is below the noise level. First, we
253: extracted the SN without any galaxy subtraction. Then, scaling to
254: narrow lines present in both the SN spectra and the galaxy template
255: spectrum, we were able to subtract the galaxy component of the
256: original SN spectra.
257:
258: The deredshifted, galaxy-subtracted spectra are shown in
259: Figure~\ref{f:allspec}. Figure~\ref{f:speccomp} shows the rest-frame
260: spectra of the three epochs of SN~1997ex along with low-$z$ comparison
261: spectra. All comparison spectra are of ``Branch-normal SNe~Ia''
262: \citep{Branch93:normal}. Examining the earliest spectrum, we see
263: strong absorption on the red side of the \ion{Ca}{2} H \& K lines and
264: the lack of \ion{Ti}{2} absorption at $\sim$4200~\AA, indicating
265: that SN~1997ex is not similar to the subluminous SN~1991bg
266: \citep[e.g.,][]{Filippenko92:91bg} or the overluminous SN~1991T
267: \citep[e.g.,][]{Filippenko92:91T}. Although pre-maximum spectra are
268: particularly useful for identifying the peculiar nature of a SN~Ia, we
269: note that the late-time spectra of SN~1997ex are consistent with a
270: Branch-normal SN~Ia as well.
271:
272:
273: \section{Time Dilation Measurement from Spectral-Feature
274: Aging}\label{s:dilation}
275:
276: The observations of SN~1997ex were separated by 24.88~d (between the
277: first and second epochs), 6.07~d (between the second and third
278: epochs), and 31.92~d (between the third and fourth epochs). In an
279: expanding universe, the spectra should have aged only 18.28~d, 4.46~d,
280: and 23.45~d (respectively) between these epochs. Using the
281: spectral-feature aging method of \citet{Riess97:timedilation}, we have
282: determined the SFA for three of our four spectra, as presented
283: in Table~\ref{t:ages}. For this calculation, we have used the
284: features listed in Table~\ref{t:features}. These features were
285: selected by a genetic algorithm designed to choose the best subset of
286: features from a randomly generated set of 400 features. This method
287: chooses different subsets of features, keeps the subsets with the best
288: age determinations, redistributes the remaining features into new
289: subsets and iterates. (see \citealt{Charbonneau95} for a general
290: description and \citealt{Foley05} for details).
291:
292: The fourth spectrum has a lower signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) than the
293: other spectra. Moreover, the age of the SN at the fourth epoch is
294: larger than the age of any SN spectrum in the catalog invoked for the
295: spectral-feature aging method \citep{Riess97:timedilation}. The
296: spectrum was obtained 62.87~d after the first-epoch spectrum and
297: $59.30 \pm 1.66$~d after the time of $B$~maximum found from fitting
298: the SFAs (the date corresponding to $t = 0$ in the fit). Even with the
299: time dilation corresponding to $z = 0.361$, the fourth-epoch spectrum
300: should have an SFA of $43.57 \pm 1.22$~d. Since the training set of
301: \citet{Riess97:timedilation} has one spectrum at $t = 40$~d and none
302: of older spectra and the S/N of the fourth-epoch spectrum is low, it
303: is understandable that no reliable age for this spectrum was obtained.
304:
305: Between the first two epochs (an observed time of 24.88~d), the SFA
306: changed by $16.96 \pm 2.75$~d. Between the second and third epochs
307: (an observed time of 6.07~d), the SFA changed by only $1.04 \pm
308: 3.03$~d.
309:
310: Shifting the data in Table~\ref{t:ages} so that the SFAs have a
311: weighted mean of zero, we were able to use a least-squares method to
312: fit the data with no covariance between the age factor and the date of
313: $B$ maximum, resulting in an age factor of $1.602 \pm 0.234$. Since
314: the no time dilation model predicts an age factor of 1.000, this age
315: factor corresponds to a $2.57 \sigma$ result if there were no time
316: dilation; thus, the measured aging for SN~1997ex is inconsistent with
317: the null hypothesis at the 99.0\% confidence level.
318:
319: The observed age factor is larger than the expected factor of $1 + z
320: = 1.361$. The difference between the observed age factor and the
321: expected value corresponds to a $1.03 \sigma$ event, which should be
322: observed 30.3\% of the time by chance.
323:
324: \section{Discussion}\label{s:discussion}
325:
326: We have shown that the spectral evolution of SN~1997ex has likely been
327: dilated by a factor of $1 + z$, as expected in an expanding
328: universe. This result also shows that the null hypothesis of no
329: cosmic expansion is ruled out at the 97.9\% level. Thus, ``tired
330: light'' and other hypotheses that predict no time dilation are
331: essentially eliminated. To be consistent with the observations,
332: alternatives such as the ``variable mass theory"
333: \citep[e.g.,][]{Narlikar97} would require a highly unlikely series of
334: coincidences, culminating with SN~Ia spectral evolution that mimics
335: the result expected with simple time dilation. \citet{Narlikar97}
336: discount the results of \citet{Leibundgut96} since the variable mass
337: theory changes the decay rate of $^{56}$Ni (which dictates the shape
338: of a SN~Ia light curve) with redshift. However, the evolution of
339: spectral features depends on the composition of the ejecta and
340: opacities, and therefore on temperature and density. Although the
341: redshift of a given spectral feature will depend on the mass of
342: subatomic particles, the evolution of that line does not depend on the
343: mass of these particles. Since spectral evolution should not change
344: with redshift, we therefore can rule out the variable mass
345: theory with our current data.
346:
347: With the current large-scale searches for high-redshift SNe, such as
348: ESSENCE\\ (http://www.ctio.noao.edu/wproject;\\ \citealt{Smith02}) and the
349: CFHT Legacy Survey (http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Science/CFHLS;
350: \citealt{Pain02:CFHTLS}), there are many more multi-epoch
351: high-redshift SN~Ia spectra. A similar analysis should be performed
352: on this larger data set to confirm and improve upon these results.
353: Knowing the time of rest-frame $B$ maximum is helpful in two ways: (1)
354: this time is independent of any intrinsic width of the SN light curve,
355: avoiding many of the photometric issues found in \citet{Leibundgut96};
356: and (2) this time is well-constrained and avoids any evolutionary
357: effects of SNe~Ia. The time of $B$ maximum is another point that can
358: be used to determine time dilation.
359:
360: Given a large sample of SNe~Ia, well-sampled light curves, and at least
361: one spectrum of each SN, the effect of time dilation across this sample
362: could be easily determined. One can place all of the SFAs and
363: spectral epochs on the same axes by matching the time of $B$ maximum
364: and scaling by redshift. With a single multi-epoch SN, we were able
365: to exclude the null hypothesis at the 97.9\% level; with a hundred
366: data points, one should be able to easily rule out the null hypothesis
367: at a much higher significance level.
368:
369: An improvement in the SN~Ia time dilation measurement can be obtained
370: through higher S/N spectra (reducing the errors on an individual SFA),
371: more epochs per SN, an expanded training set for spectral-feature
372: aging (to reduce the inherent SFA errors and to match earlier-time and
373: later-time spectra), higher-redshift SNe (which should show even more
374: time dilation), and more objects. The increase in the number of
375: objects is certain to occur as the major high-redshift SN~Ia searches
376: are finding $\sim$100 SNe~Ia per year. The higher S/N spectra
377: and multiple-epoch data sets are difficult to obtain because of the
378: constraints on spectroscopic follow-up time of SNe~Ia on
379: large-aperture telescopes. Likewise, much time must be spent to
380: obtain even a single spectrum of a faint SN~Ia at $z \approx 1$.
381: However, a better training set will be available soon, after more light
382: curves are published (CfA sample, \citealt{Jha05}; LOSS sample,
383: \citealt{Li05}).
384:
385: \begin{acknowledgments}
386: We thank the Keck Observatory staff for their assistance, and S.
387: Deustua, I. Hook, R. Knop, and E. Moran for their help with some of
388: the observations. The W.~M. Keck Observatory is operated as a
389: scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology,
390: the University of California, and NASA; the observatory was made
391: possible by the generous financial support of the W.~M. Keck
392: Foundation. A.V.F. is grateful for the support of NSF grants
393: AST-0307894 and AST-0443378, and for a Miller Research Professorship
394: at UC Berkeley during which part of this work was completed.
395: D.C.L. is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Astronomy
396: and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship under award AST-0401479.
397: \end{acknowledgments}
398:
399: \bibliographystyle{apj}
400: \bibliography{astro_refs}
401:
402: %\eject
403:
404: \clearpage
405:
406: \begin{figure}
407: \begin{center}
408: \rotatebox{90}{
409: \scalebox{0.6}{
410: \plotone{f1.ps}
411: }
412: }
413: \end{center}
414: \caption{Spectra of SN~1997ex. The spectra have been deredshifted to
415: the rest frame, and host-galaxy light has been subtracted.}\label{f:allspec}
416: \end{figure}
417:
418: \clearpage
419:
420: \begin{figure}
421: \begin{center}
422: \rotatebox{90}{
423: \scalebox{0.6}{
424: \plotone{f2.ps}
425: }
426: }
427: \end{center}
428: \caption{Spectra of SN~1997ex with low-$z$ SN comparison spectra. The
429: spectra have been deredshifted to the rest frame. The dotted lines
430: are spectra at the SFA for each SN~1997ex spectrum (SN~1995E
431: \citep{Riess98:lambda}, SN~1990N (Filippenko, private communication),
432: and SN~1994D \citep{Filippenko97} are at photometric ages of $-3$~d,
433: 14~d, and 16~d relative to $B$~maximum, respectively). The dashed
434: lines are spectra of SN~1994D at the epoch corresponding to the time
435: elapsed in the observed frame, assuming that the first-epoch SFA is
436: equivalent to its true age ($t = -2.28$~d). Clearly, the latter
437: spectra are a poor match to the observed spectra of
438: SN~1997ex.}\label{f:speccomp}
439: \end{figure}
440:
441: \clearpage
442:
443: \begin{figure}
444: \begin{center}
445: \rotatebox{90}{
446: \scalebox{0.5}{
447: \plotone{f3.ps}
448: }
449: }
450: \end{center}
451: \caption{Age-factor fit to spectral-feature ages. The slope of the
452: fit corresponds to an age factor of $1.704 \pm 0.320$. $B$-band maximum
453: is fit to be HJD $2450818.61 \pm 2.09$.}\label{f:fit}
454: \end{figure}
455:
456: %\begin{figure}
457: %\begin{center}
458: %\rotatebox{90}{
459: %\scalebox{0.5}{
460: %\plotone{pdf.ps}
461: %}
462: %}
463: %\end{center}
464: %\caption{Probability density functions for the expanding-universe
465: %model (dotted line) and null hypothesis (solid line). The dashed
466: %lines correspond to redshifts of 0.361 (the redshift measured for the
467: %SN) and 0.688 (the redshift corresponding to the SFA
468: %fit). }\label{f:pdf}
469: %\end{figure}
470:
471: \clearpage
472:
473: \begin{deluxetable}{lcr}
474: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
475: \tablewidth{0pt}
476: \tablecaption{Spectral Feature Ages\label{t:ages}}
477: \tablehead{
478: \colhead{UT Date} &
479: \colhead{HJD- 2450000} &
480: \colhead{SFA (days)} }
481:
482: \startdata
483:
484:
485: 1998-01-01 & 815.08 & $-2.50$ (2.03)\\
486:
487: 1998-01-26 & 839.96 & 14.46 (1.85)\\
488:
489: 1998-02-01 & 846.03 & 15.51 (2.39)$\!$
490:
491: %1998-03-05 & 877.95 & \nodata \\
492:
493: %1999-01-21 & 1199.90 & \nodata \\
494:
495: \tablecomments{Spectral-feature age (SFA) is relative to $B$-band
496: maximum. Uncertainties are indicated in parentheses.}
497:
498: \enddata
499:
500: \end{deluxetable}
501:
502: \clearpage
503:
504: \begin{deluxetable}{cc}
505: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
506: \tablewidth{0pt}
507: \tablecaption{Spectral Features\label{t:features}}
508: \tablehead{
509: \colhead{Feature} &
510: \colhead{Wavelength Range (\AA)} }
511:
512: \startdata
513:
514: 1 & 4397.72--5871.53 \\
515: 2 & 4682.52--5122.65 \\
516: 3 & 4725.47--4999.27 \\
517: 4 & 5593.93--5910.65 \\
518: 5 & 5642.64--6249.96 \\
519: 6 & 5716.59--6193.18 \\
520: 7 & 5719.52--5845.31 \\
521: 8 & 6015.48--6131.82
522:
523: \enddata
524:
525: \end{deluxetable}
526:
527: \clearpage
528:
529: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccccccl}
530: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
531: \tablewidth{0pt}
532: \tablecaption{Journal of Spectroscopic Observations of SN 1997ex\label{t:dates}}
533: \tablehead{\colhead{UT Date} &
534: \colhead{HJD} &
535: \colhead{Tel.\tablenotemark{a}} &
536: \colhead{Range\tablenotemark{b}} &
537: \colhead{Res.\tablenotemark{c}} &
538: \colhead{P.A.\tablenotemark{d}} &
539: \colhead{O.P.A.\tablenotemark{e}} &
540: \colhead{Air.\tablenotemark{f}} &
541: \colhead{F. Std.\tablenotemark{g}} &
542: \colhead{See.\tablenotemark{h}} &
543: \colhead{Slit} &
544: \colhead{Exp.} &
545: \colhead{Observers\tablenotemark{i}} \\
546: \colhead{yymmdd} &
547: \colhead{$-$2450000} &
548: \colhead{} &
549: \colhead{(\AA)} &
550: \colhead{(\AA)} &
551: \colhead{(deg)} &
552: \colhead{(deg)} &
553: \colhead{} &
554: \colhead{} &
555: \colhead{($''$)} &
556: \colhead{($''$)} &
557: \colhead{(s)} &
558: \colhead{} }
559:
560: \startdata
561:
562:
563: 980101 & 815.08 & KII & 4900-9860 & 10 & 124 & 58 & 1.17 & HD84 &
564: 1.0 & 1 & 600 & P,H,K,D \\
565:
566: 980126 & 839.96 & KII & 5184-8958 & 7 & 40 & 34 & 1.05 & BD26 & 1.1
567: & 1 & 3x1200 & F,L,R \\
568:
569: 980201 & 846.03 & KII & 5696-9486 & 7 & 60 & 66 & 1.36 & HD19 & 1.5
570: & 1 & 2x1200,1300 & F,L,R \\
571:
572: 980305 & 877.95 & KII & 5180-8946 & 7 & 63 & 66 & 1.36 & BD26 & 1.1
573: & 1 & 2x1800 & F,M \\
574:
575: 990121 & 1199.90 & KII & 5100-8840 & 7 & 63 & 129 & 1.10 & HD19 &
576: 0.8 & 1 & 2x1200 & F,L \\
577:
578: \enddata
579:
580: \tablecomments{Additional observation details: 980101: 300/5000
581: grating. Extracted $\pm 5$ pixels, background $\pm 7$--20. 980126:
582: 400/8500 grating. Extracted $\pm 5$ pixels, background $\pm 8$--18.
583: Dithered between exposures. 980201: 400/8500 grating. Extracted $\pm
584: 5$ pixels, background $\pm 10$--25. 980305: 400/8500 grating.
585: Extracted $\pm 5$ pixels, background $\pm 10$--25. 990121: Extracted
586: $\pm 5$ pixels, background $\pm 10$--25. In all cases the CCD pixel
587: scale was $0.42''$~pixel$^{-1}$, and an optimal extraction
588: \citep{Horne86} was performed.}
589:
590: \tablenotetext{a}{KII = Keck-II 10-m/Low Resolution Imaging
591: Spectrometer \citep{Oke95}.}
592:
593: \tablenotetext{b}{Observed wavelength range of spectrum. In some
594: cases, the ends are very noisy, and are not shown in the figures.}
595:
596: \tablenotetext{c}{Approximate spectral resolution derived from
597: night-sky lines.}
598:
599: \tablenotetext{d}{Position angle of the spectrograph slit. }
600:
601: \tablenotetext{e}{Optimal parallactic angle \citep{Filippenko82} near
602: the midpoint of the exposures.}
603:
604: \tablenotetext{f}{Average airmass of observations.}
605:
606: \tablenotetext{g}{The standard stars are as follows: HD19 = HD~19445, HD84 =
607: HD~84937, BD26 = BD+26$^\circ$2606 \citep{Oke83}.}
608:
609: \tablenotetext{h}{Seeing is estimated from the FWHM of point sources on the CCD
610: chip.}
611:
612: \tablenotetext{i}{D = Susana Deustua; F = Alex Filippenko; H =
613: Isobel Hook; K = Robert Knop; L = Douglas Leonard; M = Ed Moran; P =
614: Saul Perlmutter; R = Adam Riess.}
615:
616: \end{deluxetable}
617:
618: \end{document}
619:
620: %%
621: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
622: