1: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
2: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
3:
4: %% The command below calls the preprint style
5: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
6: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
7: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
8: %%
9: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10:
11: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
12:
13: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
14:
15: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
16:
17: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
18:
19: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
20: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
21: %% use the longabstract style option.
22:
23: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
24:
25: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
26: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
27: %% the \begin{document} command.
28: %%
29:
30: \newcommand{\hst}{{\sl HST}}
31: \newcommand{\vis}{$m_{\rm F606W}$}
32: \newcommand{\nir}{$m_{\rm F814W}$}
33: \newcommand{\Mvis}{M_{\rm F606W}}
34:
35: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
36:
37: \slugcomment{accepted AJ, 25 April 2005}
38:
39: \shorttitle{NGC 6791}
40: \shortauthors{King et al.}
41:
42: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
43: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
44:
45: \received{2005 March 15}
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \def\subr #1{_{{\rm #1}}}
49:
50: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
51: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
52: %% you desire.
53:
54: \title{Color--Magnitude Diagrams and Luminosity Functions down to the
55: Hydrogen Burning Limit. III. A Preliminary {\sl HST} Study of NGC
56: 6791\footnote{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble
57: Space Telescope}, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
58: which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.}}
59: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
60: %% author and affiliation information.
61: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
62:
63: \author{Ivan R.\ King\altaffilmark{2}, Luigi R.\ Bedin\altaffilmark{3,4},
64: Giampaolo Piotto\altaffilmark{3}, Santi
65: Cassisi\altaffilmark{5}, \and Jay Anderson\altaffilmark{6}}
66:
67: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Washington,
68: Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195-1580; king@astro.washington.edu}
69:
70: \altaffiltext{3}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Padova,
71: Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy;
72: piotto@pd.astro.it}
73:
74: \altaffiltext{4}{European Southern Observatory,
75: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.\ 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany; lbedin@eso.org}
76:
77: \altaffiltext{5}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Collurania,
78: via M. Maggini, 64100 Teramo, Italy;
79: cassisi@te.astro.it}
80:
81: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mail Stop 108,
82: Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005;
83: jay@eeyore.rice.edu}
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86: Using \hst\ ACS/WFC images, we derive the color--magnitude diagram of
87: the old, metal-rich open cluster NGC 6791 to nearly 29th magnitude in
88: $V$, which is the neighborhood of the hydrogen-burning limit.
89: Comparison with isochrones leads to a discussion of the distance
90: modulus, the reddening, and the age of the cluster. By making a
91: statistical correction for field stars we derive a preliminary
92: luminosity function, and a very tentative mass function. The white
93: dwarf sequence is clearly shown, and has been discussed in a separate
94: paper.
95: \end{abstract}
96:
97: \keywords{open clusters and associations: individual (NGC 6791) ---
98: Hertzsprung-Russell diagram --- stars: low mass, brown dwarfs}
99:
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101: %
102: \section{Introduction}
103: %
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105:
106: NGC 6791 is unique among open clusters. Not only it is one of the
107: richest of them (on the Sky Surveys it is easily mistaken for a
108: globular); it also has both an unusual metallicity [Fe/H] = +0.3
109: (Stetson, Bruntt, \& Grundahl 2003, S03; Worthey \& Jowett, 2003), and
110: an anomalously old age of 8--12 Gyr (S03; Chaboyer, Green, \& Liebert
111: 1999). Its apparent distance modulus $(m-M)_V$ = 13--13.5 (see
112: discussion in \S~4) allows us to measure stars down to the
113: neighborhood of the hydrogen-burning limit. We have therefore
114: undertaken a {\it Hubble Space Telescope} study of this cluster (GO
115: 9815) in which images made with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS)
116: take us down to $V \simeq29$. This study is part of a more extended
117: investigation aimed at studying stars in a low-mass regime that has
118: never been accessible before, and will serve as an important guide for
119: theories of the structure of low-mass stars. Our color--magnitude
120: diagrams (CMDs) will check the luminosity--radius relation, while the
121: faint end of the luminosity function (LF) can be used to check the
122: mass--luminosity relation. Our target objects (NGC 6397, M4, $\omega$
123: Centauri, 47~Tuc, and NGC 6791) will allow us to cover most of the
124: globular cluster (GC) metallicity regime, with an extension to
125: supra-solar metallicities thanks to NGC 6791.
126:
127: Our earlier results showed that while models are able to reproduce the
128: observed main sequence (MS) almost down to the hydrogen-burning limit
129: for metal poor clusters (see our study of NGC 6397 in King et al.\
130: 1998, Paper I of this series), theory fails to reproduce the CMD of a
131: moderate-metallicity GC like M4 (Bedin et al.\ 2001, Paper II). This
132: inability of stellar models to reproduce the luminosity--color
133: relation, and the implausible bends at the low-mass end of the mass
134: functions (MFs) that we derive from our LFs cast doubt on the
135: reliability of the adopted theoretical framework. However, as
136: discussed by Baraffe et al.\ (1998) and Cassisi et al.\ (2000), this
137: occurrence must be related to current uncertainties in the relations
138: between color and effective temperature that are adopted for
139: transferring stellar models from the theoretical
140: $(\log(L/L_\odot),\log{T\subr{e}})$ diagram to the various
141: observational planes. These uncertainties, which are due mainly to the
142: poorly known contribution of different chemical species to the
143: opacities of the stellar atmospheres, become more serious at higher
144: metallicities.
145:
146: Because NGC 6791 lies in a rich Galactic field (at $\ell=70^\circ$,
147: $b=+11^\circ$), our program includes a second epoch of observation, to
148: be carried out in mid-2005, to derive proper motions that we can use
149: to separate out field stars. The first-epoch images have yielded so
150: much interesting information, however, that we feel that they merit
151: the report that is given here. In fact, we are already able to
152: present the deepest CMD of NGC 6791, with a MS which extends down to
153: the hydrogen-burning limit, and, for the first time, the white dwarf
154: (WD) cooling sequence, possibly down to the faintest WDs in NGC 6791.
155: This paper will concentrate on the presentation of the data set, on
156: the data reduction, and on the main-sequence stars. The white dwarf
157: cooling sequence will be discussed in a separate paper Bedin et al.\
158: (2005b).
159:
160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
161: %
162: \section{Observational Data and Reductions}
163: %
164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
165:
166: Our observations, made with the Wide Field Channel (WFC) of ACS, were
167: of a field centered 1.5 arcmin NE of the cluster center. They were
168: taken on 16 and 17 July, 2003, through the F606W and F814W filters; in
169: each filter the exposure times were 3 $\times$ 30 sec + 2 $\times$
170: 1142 sec + 4 $\times$ 1185 sec. The images in each color were
171: dithered by fractional pixels, for better photometry and astrometry.
172:
173: We made our first measurements on the {\sf \_FLT} images, which are a
174: pipeline output that includes corrections for bias and flat field. We
175: corrected pixel values for geometrical distortion according to the
176: recipe given by Anderson (2002).
177:
178: Then, in order to reach as faint as possible, we created a stacked
179: image in each color, as follows. We first measured magnitudes and
180: positions in each image using the ePSF method described by Anderson \&
181: King (2000), and we corrected these positions for geometrical
182: distortion using the Anderson (2002) prescription. We then chose one
183: of the images as a reference frame, and found the best linear
184: transformation between each of the other images and this frame.
185:
186: Since ACS/WFC images are undersampled, we made a stack in which the
187: original 50 mas pixels are subsampled by a factor of 2 in each
188: direction. This we accomplished as follows. For each pixel of the
189: super-sampled image, we calculated the position to which it
190: corresponds in each of the distortion-corrected images, and chose a
191: pixel value derived from bi-linear interpolation in that image.
192: (There is no need to allow for the fact that the new pixels are
193: smaller, since the magnitude zero point will be calibrated only at a
194: later stage.) We calculated the mean of these 6 values, using
195: residuals to eliminate outliers by sigma-clipping at the $3\sigma$
196: level.
197:
198: We will refer to the resulting stacks as super-stacks. For all but
199: the brightest stars our final photometry was performed on the two
200: super-stacks, using DAOPHOT (Stetson 1987) and ALLSTAR (described in
201: the DAOPHOT User's Manual), with a PSF based on a Moffat function, and
202: a quadratic spatial variation.
203:
204: In attempting to push photometry to a faint limit, there is always a
205: problem with false detections at the faint end. We used three
206: criteria to eliminate false objects. First, we did the FIND operation
207: with a threshold of 3.5 times the sigma of the background, in order to
208: minimize the background noise effects. Then we eliminated as many
209: false objects as possible by requiring that the absolute value of the
210: SHA parameter of DAOPHOT be less than 0.2 and that the positions of
211: the star in each of the two super-stacks agree within a distance of
212: 0.5 pixel. Before choosing the numerical criteria just quoted, we
213: carried out photometry using a number of other values of the
214: parameters and examining the resulting color--magnitude diagrams; we
215: adopted the values that appeared to give the best compromise between
216: accepting false stars and losing real ones.
217:
218: Because stars brighter than \vis\ $\simeq$ 20.5 were saturated in the
219: long exposures, for them we used photometry by the method of Anderson
220: \& King (2000) on the short-exposure images. The super-stack
221: magnitudes were put on the zero point of the short-exposure images by
222: comparing the magnitudes of a large number of well-measured,
223: non-saturated stars that were common to both sets. The zero points
224: were set by the procedures described in Bedin et al.\ (2005a).
225:
226: Our final step was a determination of completeness as a function of
227: magnitude. This we did by adding artificial stars (constructed from
228: our PSF, with a realistic amount of noise added). In the
229: artificial-star tests 38,000 stars, on a grid with a spacing of 42
230: pixels, were added to each of the super-stacks. The grid was
231: displaced by a random number of pixels in each coordinate, the number
232: ranging from zero to one less than the separation. The same
233: displacement was used for each color.
234:
235: The artificial stars had random \vis\ magnitudes over a range of 7
236: magnitudes (23.5 $\leq$ \vis\ $\leq$ 30.5). Two separate experiments
237: were carried out. In one, the \nir\ magnitude was chosen so as to
238: place the star on the ridge line of the white-dwarf sequence; in the
239: other, the stars were on the ridge line of the main sequence. The
240: super-stacks containing the artificial stars were processed in exactly
241: the same way as the real super-stacks had been. The results of the
242: artificial star tests on the MS are shown in Fig.~1. The left panel
243: shows, in a CMD, the input (continuous line) and output
244: magnitudes. The right panel of Fig.~1 shows that our MS star counts
245: are $>50$\% complete for all magnitudes \vis\ $<28.3$.
246:
247: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
248: %
249: \section{The Color--Magnitude Diagram}
250: %
251: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
252:
253: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
254: %
255: \subsection{Our Results}
256: %
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258:
259: Figure~2 shows our full CMD of NGC 6791 for the $\sim$3200 stars which
260: remain after the selection described in the preceding section. The
261: CMD extends for 15 magnitudes, from a couple of magnitudes above the
262: TO down to \vis\ $\sim$ 29, i.e., $\sim6$ magnitudes fainter than in
263: S03.
264:
265: The CMD shows a main sequence with a well-defined turn-off, as well as
266: several magnitudes of a white-dwarf sequence. As expected from the
267: relatively low Galactic latitude of the cluster ($b=+11^\circ$), the
268: entire CMD is contaminated by field stars. As mentioned above, we
269: will use our second-epoch images (July 2005) to remove the field stars
270: by measuring the proper motions of all the stars. The field stars are
271: not nearly so numerous, however, as to obscure the cluster CMD, which
272: is clearly visible down to \vis\ $\sim28$. According to the
273: artificial star tests the completeness of our photometry is 50\% at
274: \vis\ = 28.34, and reaches 90\% at \vis\ = 27.5. Indeed, we still see
275: numerous faint field stars, but the cluster sequence seems to be
276: dwindling away.
277:
278: In Fig.~2 there is a clear indication of a well-populated binary
279: sequence running parallel to the MS, and of a possible white
280: dwarf-white dwarf binary sequence, parallel to the white dwarf cooling
281: sequence. Both sequences indicate that the fraction of binaries in
282: this cluster must be relatively high. A more quantitative analysis
283: will be done when we will have removed the field stars.
284:
285: Fig.~2 also contains two very blue stars that correspond to subdwarf
286: candidates discussed by Kaluzny \& Rucinski (1995) and S03 (Nos.\
287: 11562 and 12652 in their catalog,
288: http://cadcwww.hia.nrc.ca/stetson/NGC6791/NGC6791.dat). (The other S03
289: subdwarf candidates are outside our field.) These stars are likely
290: cluster members (S03), and their presence in such a metal-rich cluster
291: is noteworthy. They might correspond to very hot HB stars, implying
292: some anomalously high mass loss along the red giant branch, or an
293: anomalous composition (e.g., strong helium enhancement, as found in
294: Piotto et al.\ 2005 for a subsample of stars in Omega Centauri).
295:
296:
297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
298: %
299: \subsection{Comparison with the Stetson et al.\ CMD}
300: %
301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
302:
303: Unfortunately it is not possible to compare our CMD directly with that
304: of S03, on account of differences in the color systems. The
305: magnitudes of S03 are in standard {\sl BVI}, whereas our magnitudes
306: are constrained, by observational necessity, to be in the system
307: defined by the F606W and F814W filters of \hst.
308:
309: Figure~3 shows the $V-$ \vis\ and $I-$ \nir\ differences between S03
310: and our photometry as, a function of the $V-I$ color. Comparison
311: between the S03 $I$ magnitudes and our \nir, for stars measured in
312: common, shows that on the average they are nearly identical, for the
313: range of nearly 8 magnitudes that is covered, with a small offset of
314: $\sim$0.05 magnitude (which we believe arises from the difference
315: between the two passbands rather than from any error in our zero
316: point), and only a slight non-linearity; but there is no guarantee
317: that this will continue to fainter magnitudes, where the stars are so
318: cool that their spectra are full of complicated features. Even a
319: small difference between the two passbands can have sizable effects.
320:
321: For the $V$ magnitudes, however, the situation is very different, and
322: illustrates a serious problem, often not properly taken into account
323: in photometric studies based on \hst\ data. There is a pronounced
324: color equation between the S03 $V$ and our \vis. Furthermore, it can
325: be expected that this color equation will be strongly non-linear for
326: the fainter, redder stars. That this is so can be shown by means of
327: synthetic photometry, in which theoretical spectral energy
328: distributions (SEDs) are integrated over the passbands of various
329: systems and filters. Not only does the color equation between \vis\
330: and $V$ become grossly non-linear for redder stars; the non-linearity
331: depends strongly on metallicity. (We plan to devote a separate paper
332: to the problem of color equations.) Thus the faint part of our MS has
333: to stand completely on its own; there is no way of tying it to the S03
334: MS.
335:
336: The problem, already mentioned in the Introduction, is that even the
337: best available SEDs are able to match the lower-MS colors of globular
338: clusters only at the lowest metallicities. One of the aims of our
339: studies, of course, is to provide theoreticians with actual stellar
340: colors against which they can test their model atmospheres.
341:
342: {}From this point of view it makes no difference that our CMD is not
343: in $V$ and $I$; at the metallicity of NGC 6791 the transformation from
344: the (\vis,$\>$\vis\ $-$ \nir) system to $(M\subr{bol}, \log
345: T\subr{e})$ is no worse known than is the transformation from
346: $(V,\>V-I)$, since both are quite unknown. It is a sad fact that for
347: faint red stars of the metallicity of NGC 6791 no SEDs at all exist
348: yet, so comparison of observation with theory will have to await the
349: appearance of the theory.
350:
351: The real value of a system such as {\sl UBVRI} is that observers can
352: intercompare their observations conveniently if they all agree to use
353: that system. For the comparison of observation with theory, however,
354: all systems are equally valid, because comparison depends only on the
355: basic operation of integrating the SEDs of the theory over the
356: passbands of the observing system.
357:
358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
359: %
360: \subsection{Isochrone Fitting}
361: %
362: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
363:
364: One of the driving reasons of this entire project, and, in general,
365: the main reason for studying the CMD of a cluster, is for comparison
366: with the predictions of stellar evolution models. Such comparisons
367: provide important information on the stellar structure and atmosphere,
368: and allow measuring important cluster parameters, including the age
369: and the mass function. The most appropriate way to perform such a
370: comparison is to transform the theoretical tracks into the
371: observational plane. These transformations become more and more
372: uncertain for stars much cooler or much hotter than the Sun, and, as
373: noted in the previous Section, the problem becomes really severe for
374: supra-solar metallicities, to the point that we expect that our
375: observations will provide important new inputs to the theoreticians
376: working in this field.
377:
378: Unfortunately, there is an additional problem that complicates our
379: efforts:\ the (often large) uncertainties in the reddening and the
380: distance modulus of the object observed. These uncertainties are
381: particularly large in the case of NGC 6791, for which various studies
382: in the last 20 years have found reddening values $0.09<E(B-V)<0.20$
383: and true distance modulus $12.6<(m-M)_0<13.6$ (see S03, and references
384: therein).
385:
386: Definitive measurements of the reddening, distance, and age of NGC
387: 6791 are beyond the scope of the present paper. However, taking
388: advantage of the shape of the MS around the turn-off (TO), we still
389: can extract some useful information from our data (information that
390: was also used in the companion paper on the WD cooling sequence [Bedin
391: et al.\ 2005b]). Figure~4 shows the same CMDs as in Fig.~2, zoomed
392: around the TO. In order to estimate the cluster age and distance
393: modulus, we used the theoretical framework presented by Pietrinferni
394: et al.\ (2004). We refer the interested reader to that paper for a
395: detailed discussion of the stellar evolutionary models for both H- and
396: He-burning phases. Here it is enough to note that these stellar
397: models and isochrones are based on the most up-to-date physical
398: scenario that is currently available.
399:
400: The whole theoretical framework has been transferred from the
401: theoretical plane to the observational Johnson-Cousins one by using
402: the recipes described by Pietrinferni et al.\ (2004), while for the
403: ACS system on board \hst\ we adopted the color-effective-temperature
404: relations, bolometric-correction scale, and color transformations
405: presented by Bedin et al.\ (2005a)\footnote{All the theoretical models
406: adopted in present work as well as a more extended set of evolutionary
407: results and isochrones can be found at the URL
408: http://www.te.astro.it/BASTI/index.php.}. In order to fit the CMD of
409: NGC 6791, we have used the evolutionary models corresponding to the
410: chemical composition $Z=0.03$, $Y=0.288$ (i.e., [M/H] = 0.26).
411:
412: In Figure~4 we show the best fit we could get by eye. This would
413: imply an age of $\sim$9 Gyr, an $E(B-V)=0.15$, and an apparent
414: distance modulus $(m-M)_V=13.5$, which would correspond to a true
415: distance modulus $(m-M)_0=13.0$, i.e., a distance of $\sim$4 kpc from
416: us. Note that while the distance modulus differs by only 0.2 mag from
417: the distance modulus found by S03, the reddening is significantly
418: higher (by 0.06 magnitude). (We note also that Carney, Lee, \& Dodson
419: [2005] recently found from an infrared study $E(B-V)=0.14\pm0.04$ and
420: $(m-M)_0=13.04\pm0.04$.) These differences in the estimated distance
421: modulus and reddening are due in part to the combination of different
422: assumptions adopted in computing the stellar models used in the
423: present work and in the models used by S03 (for instance, the initial
424: He content and physical inputs such as the equation of state; for a
425: detailed discussion of a variety of stellar models, see VandenBerg et
426: al.\ 2000, and Pietrinferni et al.\ 2004), and in part to the
427: different bolometric corrections used to transfer the various sets of
428: stellar models from the theoretical plane to the observational ones.
429: However, as shown in Figs.~5 and 6, using our isochrones, properly
430: transformed into the standard {\sl BVI} system, with the data of S03,
431: we obtain an age, distance, and reddening consistent with the values
432: used in the fit of Fig.~4. Only with a higher metallicity ([M/H] =
433: +0.4) would we obtain a smaller reddening ($E(B-V)=0.12$, still above
434: their 0.09).
435:
436: We also performed the same exercise as in Fig.~22 of S03. Basically,
437: we compared the color of the TO in a $B-V$ vs.\ $V-I$ two-color
438: diagram with theoretical TO colors for four different metallicities
439: ([M/H] = $-$0.25, 0.05, 0.25, 0.4) and for ages in the interval 7--15
440: Gyr, at steps of 1 Gyr. Adopting a reddening law
441: $E(V-I)/E(B-V)=1.35$, we obtained a larger age ($\sim$12--13 Gyr), and
442: a smaller reddening ($E(B-V)=0.09$) than those suggested by
443: Figs.~4--6, but very similar to the values suggested by S03. In this
444: case one works only with differential numbers within the CMD; however,
445: the results are based on the (uncertain) color of only one
446: observational point, namely the TO. We prefer the more traditional
447: approach of isochrone fitting, as it takes advantage also of the shape
448: of the MSTO and SGB regions. Indeed, Figs.~4, 5, and 6 indicate that
449: the shape of the TO-SGB region is well reproduced by an isochrone at 9
450: Gyr, and that isochrones for ages $>$10 Gyr are too flat and have too
451: short a distance between the TO and the bend in the SGB to be able to
452: reproduce the observed sequence. In conclusion, according to our
453: models, both our CMD on the \hst\ ACS system and the S03 CMD suggest
454: that NGC 6791 is a very old cluster, with an age greater than 8 Gyr,
455: assuming for it a metallicity $0.2<[{\rm M/H}]<0.4$.
456:
457: There are two important notes to add here. First of all, there is some
458: inconsistency in the reddenings obtained in the fits of Figs.~5 and
459: 6. This is in part related to the intrinsic uncertainties of the
460: isochrone fitting (because of the well-known degeneracy in age,
461: distance, and reddening), but problems with the transformation of the
462: models from the theoretical plane to the observational {\sl BVI} plane
463: cannot be exluded.
464:
465: More importantly, Fig.~4 (which is in the ACS observational system)
466: shows that the models are unable to reproduce the observed CMD for
467: $m_{\rm F606W} >19.5$, being too blue compared with the observed
468: sequences. The same procedure does give a good fit to the {\sl BVI}
469: magnitudes of S03---clear evidence that the disagreement here is due
470: to uncertainty in the color-effective-temperature relations. In this
471: context we should note that our isochrones were transferred from the
472: theoretical diagram to the standard Johnson system by using accurate
473: tabulations of bolometric corrections and color-$T\subr{e}$ relations
474: based on the updated model atmospheres by Castelli \& Kurucz (2003).
475: In the regime of low-mass main-sequence stars, however, (i.e., MS
476: stars with $T\subr{e}\leq4750$~K), the empirical color-$T\subr{e}$
477: relationships provided by Houdashelt, Bell, \& Sweigart (2000) were
478: adopted, since they provided a better fit of the MS locus of some
479: selected open clusters (see Pietrinferni et al.\ 2004 for details).
480: In the case of the ACS observational system, we rely fully on the
481: theoretical color-$T\subr{e}$ transformations provided by Bedin et
482: al.\ (2005a), since empirical calibration is lacking. This explains
483: the apparent inconsistency---given that the theoretical stellar models
484: are the same in all the figures---of the results obtained in
485: Figs.~4--6.
486:
487: For the benefit of comparisons with theory, we quote the colors of the
488: main-sequence ridge line. For steps of 0.5 mag in \vis\ from 18.5 to
489: 28.5, the values of \vis\ $-$ \nir\ are 0.76, 0.84, 0.93, 1.05, 1.18,
490: 1.36, 1.53, 1.72, 1.87, 2.03, 2.16, 2.28, 2.39, 2.47, 2.54, 2.62,
491: 2.72, 2.82, 2.94, 3.14, 3.38.
492:
493:
494: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
495: %
496: \section{Luminosity Function}
497: %
498: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
499:
500: One of the ultimate aims of this project is to derive a luminosity
501: function (LF) of NGC 6791, with the field stars cleanly removed by
502: means of a proper-motion study. At the present time, even with only
503: one epoch, we can derive a preliminary LF, by making a statistical
504: allowance for the field stars. In a CMD of the cluster, we mark out
505: the main-sequence ridge line (MSRL), and we subtract its color from
506: the color of each star, so as to have a MS that stands vertically. In
507: this verticalized CMD it is fairly easy to mark a color range that
508: comfortably encompasses the MS stars, with a spread that increases at
509: fainter magnitudes to allow in a rough way for the increased
510: photometric errors. For the field stars we choose a region to the
511: blue of the MS, and somewhat separated from it. (We do not go to the
512: red side, because there is a strong indication of a cluster binary
513: sequence on that side.) The color range for the field stars is twice
514: as wide, because the Poisson error of the field-corrected MS counts
515: will then be $\sqrt{N\subr{clus} + N\subr{fld}/4}\,$; the number of
516: field stars then makes only a small contribution to the error.
517:
518: Figure 7 shows the successive stages of this process. For clarity the
519: verticalized MS is shown at two different scalings. At the far right
520: is the LF, after correction for completeness, with its error bars.
521: The dotted histogram shows the size of the correction that was made
522: for field stars.
523:
524: The quantity of real interest, however, is the mass function (MF).
525: Since the LF and the MF refer to the same stars, it is clear that
526: %
527: $$ L(\Mvis)\,d\Mvis = -f(m)\,dm, $$
528: %
529: where the notation should be obvious; the minus sign is needed because
530: $\Mvis$ and $m$ increase in opposite directions. Thus we find the MF
531: simply by multiplying the LF by $-d\Mvis/dm$. To do this, however, we
532: need to know the mass-luminosity relation (MLR) at the metallicity of
533: NGC 6791---which is lacking, because no appropriate set of
534: color-$T\subr{e}$ transformations and bolometric corrections is
535: available for very-low-mass stars with metallicity higher than solar.
536: To alleviate this problem we used the following work-around. From our
537: own set of stellar models we evaluated the difference in the F606W
538: magnitude between stellar models with the same mass and age
539: ($\approx10$~Gyr), but different metallicities:\ the solar one and the
540: metallicity adopted for NGC 6791, $Z=0.03$. We did this in the mass
541: range 0.5--0.8$m_\odot$; the mean value was $\Delta\Mvis\approx0.24$
542: mag. We then applied this constant difference to a solar MLR
543: extending to very-low-mass stars, and used the resulting MLR for the
544: conversion. It has to be emphasized that this is a crude
545: approximation to the true MLR for high-metallicity
546: stars. Nevertheless, we think that for lack of a more reliable MLR,
547: this approach should give us a not-too-gross estimate of the MF of NGC
548: 6791. The results are shown in Figure 8, in which successive panels
549: show the LF, the MF in linear units, and the MF in logarithmic units.
550: The MF is fairly flat, with irregularities that are probably due to
551: non-optimal field subtraction. We will not comment on it further,
552: because of the crude way in which it was derived, and because the
553: second-epoch observations will lead to a more reliable MF.
554:
555: One of the major purposes of this project was to study the main
556: sequence in the neighborhood of the hydrogen-burning limit. The large
557: error bars clearly make that impossible at the present stage. The
558: faintest bin, for example, has only $9\pm4.4$ stars in it. But after
559: we get our second-epoch observations, proper motions will identify the
560: stars that are actual cluster members, and our study will be able to
561: proceed. Our intention is to do as we did in the case of M4 (Bedin et
562: al.\ 2001), using the much fainter limiting magnitude of the stars
563: found in \nir\ but not in \vis\ to show that stars having the cluster
564: motion drop nearly to zero well above the limit.
565:
566:
567: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
568: %
569: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
570:
571: First-epoch \hst\ observations of NGC 6791 have led to a
572: color-magnitude diagram in which the main sequence can be followed to
573: magnitudes in the vicinity of the hydrogen-burning limit---about 6
574: magnitudes fainter than the ground-based CMD of Stetson et al.\
575: (2003). In the region of overlap the agreement is good, except for
576: color equations between our (F606W,$\,$F814W) system and their
577: $(V,\,I)$ system. At fainter magnitudes, uncertainties in the
578: spectral energy distributions make it impossible for us to convert our
579: magnitudes to $(V,I)$.
580:
581: Fits to theoretical isochrones, assuming [M/H] = +0.26, yield values
582: $(m-M)_{\rm F606W}=13.5$ and $E(B-V)_{\rm F606W}=0.15$, at age 9 Gyr.
583: For lack of the proper-motion separation of cluster stars from field
584: that we will have at our second epoch, we make a statistical
585: subtraction of field stars to get a preliminary luminosity function.
586: Lacking also a reliable mass-luminosity relation at this metallicity,
587: we make a heuristic but reasonable offset from the solar-abundance
588: MLR, and derive a tentative MF, which is rather flat.
589:
590:
591: \acknowledgments
592:
593: L.R.B., S.C., and G.P.\ acknowledge financial support by MIUR
594: (PRIN2002, PRIN2003). J.A.\ and I.R.K.\ acknowledge support by STScI
595: grant GO 9815.
596:
597: \clearpage
598:
599: \begin{thebibliography}{}
600:
601: \bibitem[]{587} Anderson, J., \& King, I.\ R. 2000, PASP, 112, 1360
602:
603: \bibitem[]{589} Anderson, J. The 2002 HST Calibration Workshop:\ Hubble
604: after the Installation of the ACS and the NICMOS Cooling System, eds.\
605: S.\ Arribas, A.\ Koekemoer, \& B.\ Whitmore (Baltimore:\ STScI), p.\ 13
606:
607: \bibitem[]{593} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.\
608: H. 1998, A\&A, 337, 403
609:
610: \bibitem[]{596} Bedin, L.\ R., Anderson, J., King, I.\ R., \& Piotto,
611: G. 2001, ApJ, 560, L75
612:
613: \bibitem[]{601} Bedin, L.\ R., Cassisi, S., Castelli, F., Piotto, G.,
614: Anderson, J., Salaris, M., Momany, Y., \& Pietrinferni, A. 2005a, \mnras,
615: 357, 1038
616:
617: \bibitem[]{603} Bedin, L.\ R., Salaris, M., Piotto, G., King,
618: I.\ R., Anderson, J., Cassisi, S., \& Momany, Y. 2005b, ApJ,
619: 624, L45
620:
621: \bibitem[]{607} Carney, B.\ W., Lee, J-W., \& Dodson, B. 2005, AJ, 129, 656
622:
623: \bibitem[]{609} Cassisi, S., Castellani, V., Ciarcelluti, P., Piotto, G.,
624: \& Zoccali, M. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 679
625:
626: \bibitem[]{612} Castelli, F., \& Kurucz, R.\ L., 2003, Proceedings of IAU
627: Symp.\ 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, eds.\ N.\
628: Piskunov, W.\ W.\ Weiss, \& D.\ F.\ Gray (astro-ph/0405087)
629:
630: \bibitem[]{616} Chaboyer, B., Green, E.\ M., \& Liebert, J. 1999, AJ, 117,
631: 1360
632:
633: \bibitem[]{619} Houdashelt, M.\ L., Bell, R.\ A., \& Sweigart, A.\ V. 2000,
634: AJ, 119, 1448
635:
636: \bibitem[]{622} Kaluzny, J., \& Rucinski, S.\ M. 1995, A\&AS, 114, 1
637:
638: \bibitem[]{624} King, I.\ R, Anderson, J., Cool, A.\ M., \& Piotto,
639: G. 1998, ApJ, 492, L37
640:
641: \bibitem[]{627} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli,
642: F. 2004, \apj, 612, 168
643:
644: \bibitem[]{630} Piotto, G., et al.\ (12 authors) 2005, ApJ, 621, 777
645:
646: \bibitem[]{632} Sandage, A., Lubin, L.\ M., \& VandenBerg, D.\ A. 2003,
647: PASP 115, 1187
648:
649: \bibitem[]{635} Stetson, P.\ B., Bruntt, H., \& Grundahl, F. 2003. PASP,
650: 115, 413 (S03)
651:
652: \bibitem[]{638} Stetson, P.\ B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191
653:
654: \bibitem[]{640} VandenBerg, D.\ A., Swenson, F.\ J., Rogers, F.\ J.,
655: Iglesias, C.\ A., \& Alexander, D.\ R. 2000, ApJ, 532, 430
656:
657: \bibitem[]{643} Worthey, G., \& Jowett, K.\ J. 2003, PASP, 115, 96
658:
659: \end{thebibliography}
660:
661:
662: \clearpage
663:
664: \begin{figure}
665: \epsscale{1.00}
666: \plotone{f1.eps}
667: \caption{Results of the artificial star tests on the cluster MS. The
668: left panel show the input (continuous line) and output CMD. The
669: completeness is shown in the right panel. Our counts have
670: completeness 50\% at \vis\ = 28.35.}
671: \end{figure}
672:
673: \begin{figure}
674: \epsscale{1.00}
675: \plotone{f2.eps}
676: \caption{The \nir\ vs. \ \vis\ $-$ \nir\ and the \vis\ vs.\ \vis\ $-$
677: \nir\ CMDs.}
678: \end{figure}
679:
680: \begin{figure}
681: \epsscale{1.00}
682: \plotone{f3.eps}
683: \caption{The $V-$\vis\ (upper panel) and $I-$\nir\ (lower panel)
684: differences between S03 and our magnitudes, plotted against the $V-I$
685: color. The straight lines are drawn arbitrarily, just to make
686: non-lnearities more evident. Note the slight non-linearity in the
687: $I-$\nir\ differences, and the much stronger non-linearity in the
688: $V-$\vis\ differences. As explained in the text, the non-linearity will
689: increase sharply at redder colors.}
690: \end{figure}
691:
692: \begin{figure}
693: \epsscale{1.00}
694: \plotone{f4.eps}
695: \caption{The best fit of the Pietrinferni et al.\ (2004) isochrones to the
696: observed CMD in the ACS observational plane. It implies an age of 9
697: Gyr, $E(B-V)=0.15$, and an apparent distance modulus $(m-M)_{F606W}=13.5$.}
698: \end{figure}
699:
700: \begin{figure}
701: \epsscale{1.00}
702: \plotone{f5.eps}
703: \caption{Same as in Fig.~4, but here the isochrones are fitted to the
704: S03 data in the standard {\sl BVI} observational plane.}
705: \end{figure}
706:
707: \begin{figure}
708: \epsscale{1.00}
709: \plotone{f6.eps}
710: \caption{Same as Fig.~5, for the $V$ vs.\ $B-I$ CMD (right panel). In the
711: left panel the same CMD is fitted with 8, 9, 10, and 12 Gyr isochrones
712: for [M/H] = 0.4.}
713: \end{figure}
714:
715:
716: \begin{figure}
717: \epsscale{1.00}
718: \plotone{f7.eps}
719: \caption{The leftmost panel shows the main sequence, with its ridge line
720: marked by dots; the line through them is a quadratic smoothing. The two
721: middle panels show the verticalized MS at two scalings; cluster stars
722: were counted between the blue lines and field stars between the red
723: lines. In the rightmost panel is the luminosity function, before and
724: after completeness correction; the dotted line shows the correction that
725: was made for field stars.}
726: \end{figure}
727:
728: \begin{figure}
729: \epsscale{1.00}
730: \plotone{f8.eps}
731: \caption{The top panel repeats the LF shown in the previous figure. The
732: next two panels show the MF, in linear and in logarithmic form.}
733: \end{figure}
734:
735: \end{document}
736:
737: