1: \documentstyle[epsf,eqsecnum,aps,prd]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[epsf,seceq,preprint]{ptptex}
3: %\documentstyle[epsf,seceq]{ptptex}
4: %\documentstyle[11pt,eclepsf,aaspp4]{article}
5: %\oddsidemargin=0cm
6: %\evensidemargin=0cm
7: %\topmargin=0cm
8: %\textwidth=16.0cm
9: %\textheight=20cm
10: %\headsep=0.0cm
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %\draft
13: \def\rad{{\chi}}
14: \def\w{{\omega}}
15: %\def\and{{$\&$ }}
16: %\def\lesssim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim<}}
17: %\def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim>}}
18: %\def\oversim#1#2{\lower0.2ex\vbox{\baselineskip0pt\lineskip0pt
19: % \lineskiplimit0pt\ialign{$#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: %\thispagestyle{empty}
22: %{\baselineskip0pt
23: %\leftline{\large\baselineskip16pt\sl\vbox to0pt{
24: % \hbox{Department of Physics}
25: % \hbox{Hiroshima University}
26: %\vss}}
27: %\rightline{\large\baselineskip16pt\rm\vbox to20pt{
28: % \hbox{\today}
29: % \hbox{HUPD-0201}
30: % \hbox{astro-ph/??}
31: %\vss}}%
32: %}
33: %\vfill
34: %\vspace{3cm}
35: %\received{4 August 2002}
36: %\accepted{23 September 2002}
37: %\journalid{337}{15 January 2002}
38: %\articleid{11}{14}
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
41: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
42: \def\fr{{f_r}}
43: %\slugcomment{{\today}}
44: %\slugcomment{HUPD-0201}
45: %\lefthead{Yamamoto}
46: %\righthead{}
47:
48: \begin{document}
49: \title{Modulation of a Chirp Gravitational Wave from a Compact Binary
50: due to Gravitational Lensing}
51:
52: \vfill
53: \author{Kazuhiro Yamamoto}
54: \bigskip
55: \address{
56: %\inst{
57: Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University,
58: Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526,~Japan}
59: %\altaffiltext{1}{e-mail: kazuhiro@hiroshima-u.ac.jp}
60:
61: %\recdate{Received June, 2003}
62:
63: \maketitle
64: \begin{abstract}
65: A possible wave effect in the gravitational lensing phenomenon
66: is discussed. We consider the interference of two coherent
67: gravitational waves of slightly different frequencies
68: from a compact binary, due to the gravitational lensing
69: by a galaxy halo.
70: This system shows the modulation of the wave amplitude.
71: The lensing probability of such the phenomenon is of order
72: $10^{-5}$ for a high-$z$ source, but it may be advantageous
73: to the observation due to the magnification of the amplitude.
74: %}
75: %We discuss a possible gravitational lensing phenomenon of the chirp
76: %gravitational wave signal from a binary of compact objects.
77: %We consider the interference of two coherent waves due to
78: %the gravitational lensing by a galaxy halo.
79: %The interference of the two waves with slightly different
80: %frequencies, due to the time delay effect, will result in
81: %the modulation of the wave amplitude. The lensing optical
82: %depth is estimated to be of order $10^{-6}\sim10^{-5}$ typically for
83: %a source at redshift $z\simgt 1$. This is a small probability,
84: %but such a lensed signal might be important because of the
85: %selection effect due to the lensing magnification.
86: %\bigskip
87: \end{abstract}
88: \pacs{98.80.-k, 98.62.Sb, 95.85.Sz}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
89: %\keywords{cosmology: theory -- gravitational lensing -- gravitational wave}
90: \vspace{0.6cm}
91:
92: %\maketitle
93:
94: %\vfill
95: %\thispagestyle{empty}
96: %\newpage
97: \def\M{{M}}
98: %-----------------------------------------------------------
99: %\section{Introduction}
100: %-----------------------------------------------------------
101: \def\Re{{R_E}}
102: \def\Hz{{\rm Hz}}
103:
104: The wave effect in gravitational lensing phenomenon has been
105: investigated by many authors (see e.g., \cite{Deguchi,SEF} and
106: references therein).
107: This subject is recently revisited by several authors, motivated
108: by a possible phenomenon which might be observed in the future
109: gravitational wave experiments
110: \cite{TTN,DN,BHN,PINQ,Ruffa,TN,Takahashi,JPM,TNB,TSM}.
111: In these works, the authors focus on the diffraction in the
112: wave effect, which is substantial for $\lambda\sim\Re$, where
113: $\lambda$ is the wave length and $\Re$ is the Schwarzschild
114: radius of the lens mass.
115: However, in the present work, we focus on another different
116: aspect of the wave effect, the modulation of superposed two waves,
117: in the limit that the geometrical optics is valid
118: $\lambda\ll\Re$. Some aspect of this effect has been
119: investigated by the author and Tsunoda \cite{KY} as a
120: lensing phenomenon by a cosmic string. Here we perform
121: the similar analysis for the lensing by a galaxy halo.
122: Throughout this paper, we use the convention $G=c=1$.
123:
124: We start by considering the superposition of two lensed
125: waves with the amplitude
126: $A_1$ and $A_2$ and the angular frequencies $\w_1$ and $\w_2$.
127: Namely, we consider the wave expressed by
128: \begin{eqnarray}
129: {\cal E} = A_1\cos\left(\omega_1t\right) +A_2\cos\left(\omega_2t+\delta\right),
130: \end{eqnarray}
131: where we assume that the phase $\delta$ involves the information of
132: the path difference, and the difference of the frequencies $\w_1$
133: and $\w_2$ are due to the time delay effect.
134: %\begin{eqnarray}
135: % {\cal E} = \sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2}\left(\cos\alpha\cos(\omega_1(t))
136: % +\sin\alpha\cos(\omega_2(t)+\delta)\right)
137: %\end{eqnarray}
138: %where $\alpha={\rm Arctan}{A_2\over A_1}$.
139: %Assuming $A_2=A_1+\Delta A$ and $\Delta A<< A_1$,
140: %$\alpha$ is approximated as
141: %\begin{eqnarray}
142: %\alpha\simeq {\pi\over 4}+{\Delta A\over 2A_1}
143: %\end{eqnarray}
144: Assuming $A_2=A_1+\Delta A$ and $\Delta A<< A_1$, $\cal E$ reduces to
145: \begin{eqnarray}
146: {\cal E} &\simeq&\sqrt{2(A_1^2+A_2^2)}
147: \biggl[ \cos\left({(\omega_1+\omega_2)t+\delta\over2}\right)
148: \cos\left({(\omega_1-\omega_2)t-\delta\over2}\right)
149: \nonumber
150: \\ && \hspace{0.5cm}
151: + {\Delta A\over 2 A_1}
152: \sin\left({(\omega_1+\omega_2)t+\delta\over2}\right)
153: \sin\left({(\omega_1-\omega_2)t-\delta\over2}\right)
154: \biggr].
155: \label{emod}
156: \end{eqnarray}
157: This means that, if $\Delta A/A_1\ll 1$, the wave amplitude
158: modulates with the period
159: \begin{eqnarray}
160: {\cal T} = {4\pi\over (\omega_1-\omega_2)}
161: \simeq{4\pi\over \Delta T}
162: \left( d\omega\over dt\right)^{-1},
163: \end{eqnarray}
164: where $\Delta T$ is the time delay and $d\omega/dt$ is the change rate of $\omega$
165: for an observer.
166:
167:
168: We consider a gravitational wave from a binary of compact objects with equal mass $M$.
169: By decreasing energy due to the gravitational wave radiation,
170: the orbit of the binary changes.
171: Thus the angular frequency $\omega$ changes. The rate
172: of the change is estimated as \cite{Schutz},
173: \begin{eqnarray}
174: {d\omega \over dt}={0.3\times 10^{-8}} (1+z_s)^{5/3}
175: \biggl({M\over M_\odot}\biggr)^{5/3}
176: \biggl({\omega\over {\rm rad/s} }\biggr)^{11/3}
177: {\rm rad/s^2},
178: \end{eqnarray}
179: where $z_s$ is the redshift of the source. Here note that $\omega$ and
180: $t$ are the angular frequency and the time of the observer.
181: %
182: Now we consider a lens halo modeled by the singular isothermal sphere
183: with the velocity dispersion $\sigma$. Then the time delay is
184: \begin{eqnarray}
185: \Delta T=2.7\times 10^7 (1+z_l)
186: \biggl({\sigma\over 200{\rm km/s}}\biggr)^4
187: \biggl({D_{\rm OL}D_{\rm LS}\over H_0^{-1} D_{OS}}\biggr)
188: \biggl({\fr-1\over \fr+1}\biggr)
189: ~{\rm s},
190: \end{eqnarray}
191: where $D_{\rm OL}$, $D_{\rm OS}$ and $D_{\rm LS}$ are the angular
192: diameter distances following the usual convention \cite{SEF},
193: $\fr$ is the flux ratio of the two waves, $z_l$ is the
194: redshift of the lens, and we have adopted the Hubble parameter
195: $H_0=70{\rm km/s/Mpc}$.
196: %
197: Then the period of the modulation is estimated as
198: \begin{eqnarray}
199: {\cal T} &\simeq& {3.5\times{10^{6}} \over (1+z_l)(1+z_s)^{5/3}}
200: {\fr+1\over \fr-1}
201: \nonumber
202: \\
203: &&\hspace{0mm}\times\biggl({M\over M_\odot}\biggr)^{-5/3}
204: \biggl({\nu\over 0.01{\rm Hz} }\biggr)^{-11/3}
205: \biggl({\sigma\over 200{\rm km/s}}\biggr)^{-4}
206: \biggl({D_{\rm OL}D_{\rm LS}\over H_0^{-1} D_{OS}}\biggr)^{-1}
207: ~{\rm s}.
208: %\nonumber
209: %\\
210: \end{eqnarray}
211:
212:
213:
214: Now let us consider the probability of such a lensing phenomenon.
215: The optical depth is estimated by \cite{SEF}
216: \begin{eqnarray}
217: \tau(z_s)=\int_0^{z_s}dz_l {dt\over dz_l} \int dM \pi a^2(\sigma[M],z_l,z_s) (1+z_l)^3
218: {dn(M,z_l)\over dM},
219: \label{tautau}
220: \end{eqnarray}
221: where $\pi a^2(\sigma,z_l,z_s)$ is the cross section of the lensing
222: event for a halo and $dn/dM$ is the mass function.
223: We have computed the optical depth by the numerical integration,
224: adopting the analytic method for the mass function
225: based on the Press-Schechter formalism \cite{NS,TC}.
226: Here we assumed the concordance cosmological model: The flat
227: universe with the matter density parameter $\Omega_m=0.3$
228: and the Harrison Zeldovich spectrum $n=1$ normalized as $\sigma_8=0.9$.
229:
230:
231:
232:
233: The wave amplitudes $A_1$ and $A_2$ must be almost the same for the
234: modulation formula (\ref{emod}),
235: which is satisfied when the flux ratio $\fr$ is nearly equal 1.
236: Figure 1 demonstrates the optical depth $\tau$ as the function of the
237: source redshift $z_s$. The upper and lower curves
238: assume $\fr<1.4$ and $\fr<1.2$, respectively.
239: In the computation of $\tau$, we set the condition
240: that the time delay $\Delta T$ is less than $10^8$ s.
241: It is clear that the optical depth is typically of order
242: $10^{-6}\sim10^{-4}$ for a source at redshift
243: $z_s\simgt 1$.
244:
245: The sum of the amplification factor of two images is written
246: as $\mu_1+\mu_2=2(f_r+1)/(f_r-1)$ with the flux ratio $f_r$
247: for the singular isothermal sphere model \cite{SEF}.
248: The energy flux is in proportion to the square of the amplitude
249: of the gravitational wave. Therefore the amplification of the
250: gravitational wave amplitude due to the gravitational lensing
251: can be written as $\sqrt{2(f_r+1)/(f_r-1)}$. If the flux ratio
252: is very close to $1$, the magnification factor can be large.
253: It might allow us to observe the gravitational sources at very
254: high redshift.
255:
256: In conclusion, when a detector with sufficient angular resolution and
257: sensitivity is assumed, the periodic modulation in the gravitational wave
258: can be a signature of the interference by the lensing
259: phenomenon.
260: The probability of the lens phenomenon is small, being typically
261: of order $10^{-6}\sim10^{-5}$ ($10^{-5}\sim10^{-4}$) for a
262: source at redshift $z_s\sim 1 (\sim5)$.
263: However, the flux of such a lensed source is amplified by the
264: magnification effect.
265: %It might be worth to know the possibility that
266: Therefore such a lensed source might be advantageous to be observed
267: in the future gravitational wave experiments (see e.g.,
268: \cite{SKN} and references therein).
269:
270: In the present work, however, an idealized situation is assumed.
271: We assumed a point source, which is a relevant assumption
272: for the compact binary as a gravitational wave source.
273: It might not be realistic to model the lensing halos with
274: the spherical symmetry, however, we believe
275: that this will not affect our conclusion qualitatively
276: because we worked under the condition that the usual
277: geometrical optics is valid.
278:
279:
280: \vspace{1mm}
281: {\it Acknowledgments}
282: The author thanks Y. Kojima for reading the manuscript and
283: useful comments. He also thanks R. Takahashi for useful
284: discussions. He is also grateful to the referee for useful
285: comments, which helped improve the manuscript.
286: This work is supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for
287: Scientific research of Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
288: Science and Technology, No.15740155.
289:
290:
291: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
292: \bibitem{Deguchi} S. Deguchi and W. D. Watson, PRD 34, 1708 (1986);
293: ApJ., 307, 30 (1986)
294: \bibitem{SEF} P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, {\it Gravitational Lenses }
295: (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992)
296: \bibitem{TTN} T. T. Nakamura, PRL. 80, 1138 (1998)
297: \bibitem{DN} T. T. Nakamura and S. Deguchi, Prog. Theo. Phys. Suppl. 133, 137
298: (1999)
299: \bibitem{BHN} C. Baraldo, A. Hosoya and T. T. Nakamura, PRD 59, 083001 (1999)
300: \bibitem{PINQ} F. de Paolis, G. Ingross, A. A. Nucita and A. Qadir,
301: A\&A, 394, 749 (2002)
302: \bibitem{Ruffa}
303: A. A. Ruffa, ApJ, 517, L31 (1999)
304: \bibitem{TN} R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, ApJ, 596 L231 (2003)
305: \bibitem{Takahashi} R. Takahashi, A\&A 423, 787 (2004)
306: \bibitem{JPM} J-P. Macquart, A\&A 422, 761 (2004)
307: \bibitem{TNB}R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 63 (2005)
308: \bibitem{TSM} R. Takahashi, T. Suyama and S. Michikoshi, (astro-ph/0503343)
309: \bibitem{KY} K. Yamamoto and K. Tsunoda, PRD 68, 041302(R) (2003)
310: \bibitem{Schutz} B. F. Schutz, {\it A first course in general relativity},
311: (Cambridge University Press 1985)
312: \bibitem{NS} T. T. Nakamura and Y. Suto, Prog. Theor. Phys., 97, 49 (1997)
313: \bibitem{TC} R. Takahashi and T. Chiba, ApJ. 563, 489 (2001)
314: \bibitem{SKN} N. Seto, S. Kawamura, T. Nakamura, PRL., 87, 221103 (2001)
315: \end{thebibliography}
316:
317:
318:
319:
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321: \begin{figure}[b]
322: \begin{center}
323: \leavevmode
324: \epsfxsize=12cm
325: \epsfbox[20 150 600 720]{f1.eps}
326: %\epsfile{file=f1.ps,width=0.50\textwidth}
327: \end{center}
328: \caption{Optical depth $\tau$
329: %defined by equation (\ref{tautau})
330: as the function of the redshift of the source $z_s$.
331: The upper and lower curves correspond to
332: $\fr\leq 1.4$ and $\fr\leq 1.2$, respectively.
333: We integrated $\tau$ under the condition $\Delta T\leq 10^8 ~{\rm sec}$.}
334: \label{fig1}
335: \end{figure}
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337:
338:
339:
340:
341:
342:
343: \end{document}
344: