1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
2:
3: %% History: 1st draft 5/12/05
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Discovery of Non-radial pulsations in PQ Andromedae}
8:
9: \author{Karen M. Vanlandingham}
10: \affil{Columbia University, Department of Astronomy, New York, NY 10027}
11: \email{kmv14@columbia.edu}
12:
13: \author{Greg J. Schwarz}
14: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
15: \email{gschwarz@as.arizona.edu}
16:
17: \and
18:
19: \author{Steve B. Howell}
20: \affil{WIYN Observatory and National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85726}
21: \email{howell@noao.edu}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: We have detected pulsations in time-series photometry of the
25: WZ Sge dwarf nova PQ And. The strongest peak in the power spectrum
26: occurs at a period of 10.5 minutes. Similar periods have been
27: observed in other WZ Sge systems and are attributed to
28: ZZ Ceti type non-radial pulsations. There is no indication in
29: the photometry of an approximately 1.7 hour orbital period as
30: reported in previous spectroscopic observations.
31: \end{abstract}
32:
33: \keywords{binaries: close --- stars: dwarf novae --- stars:individual(PQ And)}
34:
35: \section{Introduction}
36: PQ And is a dwarf nova with three known outbursts in the last $\sim$ 70
37: years (Richter 1990). The last outburst on 21 March, 1988 reached a
38: visual magnitude of 10 (Hurst 1988). It had many of the characteristics
39: of the WZ Sge class of dwarf novae including a large outburst
40: amplitude
41: and strong Balmer emission superimposed over broad absorption at quiescence
42: (Howell et al. 1995). However, to be in the WZ Sge class, PQ And must have
43: an orbital period below the period gap. Time series optical spectra of
44: PQ And were obtained by Schwarz et al. (2004) to determine the orbital
45: period of the system. They found a period of 1.7 hours from the fit to
46: the radial velocity curve as determined from the convolution of double
47: Gaussians to the line profiles (Schafter 1985). Unfortunately the
48: derived period was similar in length to the total observing time and
49: couldn't be classified as a definite period due to undersampling.
50: Nevertheless the H$\alpha$ emission showed a clear periodic change in
51: its blue and red components during the observing run which supported
52: a short orbital period typical of WZ Sge systems. An optically thin disk,
53: showing the WD absorption, is indicative of a short period, low-$\dot{m}$
54: system (i.e. below the period gap). Likewise, the lack
55: of an accretion disk in the optical spectrum placed a firm upper limit
56: of 3 hours on the orbital period of PQ And.
57:
58: Schwarz et al. also determined the effective temperature and
59: surface gravity of the white dwarf (WD) using synthetic spectra
60: from model atmospheres. The best fits gave T$_{eff}$ = 12,000 $\pm$ 1,000 K
61: and log($g$) = 7.7 $\pm$ 0.3 (cgs units) which placed PQ And in the
62: region of the ZZ Ceti instability strip (Bergeron et al. 1995; 2004). They
63: noted that with its low accretion rate, PQ And was an excellent candidate
64: to search for non-radial oscillations which have recently been observed
65: in other WZ Sge novae.
66:
67: In this paper we present the results of a photometric campaign to search
68: for non-radial pulsations in PQ And. Section 2 provides details of the
69: observations. The analysis of the data are given in Section 3 and our
70: conclusions follow in Section 4.
71:
72: \section{Observations}
73:
74: Our photometric observations were carried out using the Orthogonal
75: Parallel Transfer Imaging Camera (OPTIC, see Howell et al, 2003)
76: at the WIYN observatory 3.5-m telescope located on Kitt Peak.
77: OPTIC is the only prototype orthogonal transfer CCD
78: imager operating (see Tonry et al., 2002) and
79: consists of two 2K by 4K CCID-28 OTCCDs in a single dewar
80: mounted adjacent to each other with a small gap in between the chips.
81: OPTIC is controlled by standard SDSU-2 electronics running custom microcode
82: and reads out the two OTCCDs via 4
83: video channels, one located in each corner of the device.
84: OPTIC has a read noise of $<$4 electrons when
85: read at a normal rate of 160 kpix/sec and a gain of 1.45 e/ADU.
86:
87: We used OPTIC in conventional mode placing the target star and all comparison
88: stars of interest in one of the CCDs.
89: Two time series data sets were obtained, the first was on the night of 14
90: September 2004 UT and the second on 13 October 2004 UT. The September
91: observations consisted of $\sim$125, 45 second observations using a
92: Johnson V filter.
93: The CCD was binned 2 X 2 (the seeing on this night was 1.6") and the readout
94: time was 8 seconds. The October observations consisted of $\sim$100 60 second
95: V-band integrations using 1 X 1 binning (readout time was 24 seconds) and
96: the seeing was 0.5".
97:
98: The data were reduced using the standard IRAF packages. Relative photometry
99: was performed using four different background stars as references. Figure 1
100: shows a plot of the magnitude difference as a function of time for both nights.
101: The squares represent the difference between two of the reference stars while
102: the triangles represent the difference between PQ And and one of the reference
103: stars. The horizontal axis is the time since the start of observations for
104: each night.
105: The light curves of both nights clearly show fluctuations of up to
106: $\sim$0.1 magnitudes.
107: All reference stars and PQ And were of similar magnitude therefore
108: the scatter in the reference star data gives an estimate of the errors in
109: the magnitude change for PQ And. From Figure 1 we see that the magnitude
110: errors are on order of 0.015.
111:
112: \begin{figure}
113: \plotone{f1.eps}
114: \caption{The magnitude difference between two reference stars (squares) and
115: PQ And and one of the reference stars (triangles) for each night. t$_0$ is
116: taken as the time of the first observation of each night.}
117: \end{figure}
118:
119: \section{Analysis}
120:
121: To search for any periodicities in the light curves the data were put
122: through a Fourier transform routine. The resulting power spectra for each
123: date are shown in Figure 2. Based on the length of time PQ And
124: was observed and the sampling rate of each night, we searched the frequency
125: space from 0.5 to 30 hr$^{-1}$.
126: To determine the level of significance for peaks in the power spectrum we
127: added a tracer signal to our data and ran it through the Fourier routine
128: until we were unable to detect it. From this we found that peaks with a
129: power less than $\sim10^{-5}$ were not significant.
130: Three strong peaks appear in the
131: power spectra of both nights. The strongest peak is found at a frequency
132: of 5.6 hr$^{-1}$, a period of 10.5 minutes, in both spectra. We also see
133: what appear to be harmonics of this peak at frequencies of $\sim$2.8 hr$^{-1}$
134: and $\sim$1.4 hr$^{-1}$. At higher frequencies the two power spectra differ
135: slightly. In the September data we see no significant peaks beyond the
136: three already mentioned while the October power spectrum shows a few
137: small peaks at higher frequencies. These peaks are found at 7.8, 8.4, 9.2,
138: 22.5, and 29 hr$^{-1}$ (periods in the range of 2-8 minutes). The difference
139: between the two nights could be due to many things including sampling rates,
140: seeing effects, and variability in the WD itself.
141:
142: \begin{figure}
143: \plotone{f2.eps}
144: \caption{The individual power spectra of the two dates. Both dates show
145: peaks near frequencies of 5.6, 2.8 and 1.5 hr$^{-1}$. The observations
146: from October show a few additional minor peaks at longer frequencies.}
147: \end{figure}
148:
149: Figure 3 shows the data phased to a period of 10.5 minutes and put in phase
150: bins. The error bars have been determined
151: from the scatter in the light curve of the reference stars. The data
152: show an overall change in magnitude of about 0.1.
153:
154: \begin{figure}
155: \plotone{f3.eps}
156: \caption{The data from both nights phased to a period of 10.5 minutes and
157: binned.}
158: \end{figure}
159:
160: \section{Discussion}
161: The most significant period we find, 10.5 minutes, is much shorter than
162: any expected orbital period for a CV. Several WZ Sge systems have recently
163: been found with similar short period, low amplitude oscillations
164: (Araujo-Betancor et al 2005; Townsley, Arras \& Bildsten 2004;
165: Woudt \& Warner 2004; van Zyl et al 2004). These periodic fluctuations
166: have been attributed to ZZ Ceti like non-radial pulsations of the
167: WD primary. In the five systems reported to date, there appears
168: to be a pattern in the periods found. All of the stars show periods
169: around 10 minutes and then several other periods on shorter time scales
170: (3-6 minutes). Long term monitoring shows that these periods are variable
171: between subsequent observations.
172: Our findings for PQ And match this general pattern. Some of
173: the other ZZ Ceti systems in the literature have more complicated power spectra,
174: showing peaks at longer frequencies that are multiples or combinations of
175: the shorter frequency peaks. We don't see these patterns in our data for PQ
176: And however
177: it could be that we have insufficient data to detect these complexities.
178: Most of the other ZZ Ceti systems have far more extensive data sets.
179:
180: The radial velocity analysis of Schwarz et al. (2004) implied an orbital
181: period of $\sim$102 minutes for PQ And. Figure 4 shows the power spectrum
182: of our data in the frequency range of 0.5 to 2 hr$^{-1}$ (120 to 30 minutes).
183: The strongest peak is the 2nd harmonic of the 10.5 minute pulsation
184: period. There is
185: a smaller peak structure at about 0.7 hr$^{-1}$ (86 minutes) but it
186: doesn't fit the previously derived orbital period and it is very close to
187: our significance threshold.
188: It is disconcerting that the orbital period as determined from the
189: radial velocities is not seen in the power spectrum of the photometry.
190: One explanation is that the PQ And
191: system is at a low inclination.
192: If this is the case then orbital motions would cause the observed
193: periodicity in the H$\alpha$ red and blue emission components but no
194: photometric eclipses would be seen.
195: We can place an upper limit on the system inclination
196: using the estimated mass ratio from Schwarz et al. (2004) and the minimum
197: inclination for primary eclipses (see equations 2.5c and 2.64 from
198: Warner 1995). A $q\sim0.3$ places an upper inclination limit of about
199: 74$^\circ$ for PQ And.
200:
201:
202: \begin{figure}
203: \plotone{f4.eps}
204: \caption{The power spectrum of the combined data from 0.5 to 2 hr$^{-1}$.
205: There is no orbital period peak at 0.59 hr$^{-1}$ as suggested by the
206: radial velocity analysis of Schwarz et al. (2004).}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: The available evidence points to PQ And containing a ZZ Ceti white dwarf.
210: The primary pulsation period we find is 10.5 minutes which is similar to
211: those found in other WZ Sge type systems with ZZ Ceti like white dwarf
212: parameters and pulsations. More extensive observations may reveal
213: alternate pulsation modes as has been found in other ZZ Ceti systems.
214: We find no evidence for the 1.7 hour orbital period reported by
215: Schwarz et al (2004) in our data.
216:
217: \acknowledgments
218: We would like to thank Gary Schmidt for use of his Fourier analysis programs.
219: We would also like to thank the anonymous referee for their many useful
220: comments which helped to improve this paper.
221:
222: \begin{references}
223:
224: \reference{head2004} Araujo-Betancor, S., Gansicke, B.T., Hagen, H.-J., Marsh,
225: T.R., Harlaftis, E.T., Thorstensen, J., Fried, R.E., Schmeer, P., \&
226: Engels, D. 2004, A\&A, 430, 629
227:
228: \reference{1995} Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F. Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G.,
229: Saffer, R.A. \& Allard, N.F. 1995, ApJ, 449, 258
230:
231: \reference{head2004} Bergeron, P. Fontaine, G., Bill\`{e}res, M., Boudreault, S. \& Green, E.M. 2004, ApJ, 600, 404
232:
233: \reference{head1995} Howell, S.B., Szkody, P. \& Cannizzo, J.K. 1995, ApJ, 439, 337
234:
235: \reference{head2003} Howell, S.B., Everett, M.E., Tonry, J.L., Pickles, A., \&
236: Courtney, D. 2003, \pasp, 115, 1340
237:
238: \reference{head1988} Hurst, G.M. 1988, IAUC 4570
239:
240: \reference{head1990} Richter, G.A. 1990, Inf. Bull. Var. Stars, 3546, 1
241:
242: \reference{head2004} Schwarz, G.J., Barman, T., Silvestri, N., Szkody, P.,
243: Starrfield, S., Vanlandingham, K., \& Wagner, R.M. 2004, \pasp, 116, 1111
244:
245: \reference{head1985} Shafter, A.W. 1985, in Cataclysmic Variable and Low
246: Mass X-Ray Binares, ed. D.Q. Lamb \& J. Patterson (Dordrecht: Reidel), 355
247:
248: \reference{head2002} Tonry, J. L., Luppino, G., Kaiser, N., Burke, B., \& Jacoby, G., 2002, SPIE, 4836, 206 1340
249:
250: \reference{head2004} Townsley, D.M., Arras, P. \& Bildsten, L. 2004, ApJ, 608, L105
251:
252: \reference{head2004} van Zyl, L., Warner, B., O'Donoghue, D., Hellier, C.,
253: Woudt, P., Sullivan, D., Pritchard, J., Kemp, J., Patterson, J., Welsh, W.,
254: Casares, J., Shahbaz, T., van der Hooft, F., \& Vennes, S. 2004, \mnras,
255: 350, 307
256:
257: \reference{head1995} Warner, B. 1995, Catacylsmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press)
258:
259: \reference{head2004} Woudt, P.A. \& Warner, B. 2004, \mnras, 348, 599
260:
261: \end{references}
262:
263: \end{document}
264: