1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amssymb}
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{A Deep Infrared Search for AXP 1E~1841$-$045.}
7: \author{Martin Durant}
8: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of
9: Toronto,\\ 60 St. George St, Toronto, Canada}
10: \keywords{pulsars: individual (1E 1841-045)}
11:
12: \begin{abstract}
13: Multi-colour (JHK$_\textrm{S}$) imaging and photometry of the field of
14: the Anomalous
15: X-ray Pulsar AXP 1E~1841$-$045 is analysed in the light of new, accurate
16: coordinates from {\em Chandra} (Wachter et al, 2004). From excellent
17: quality images, we find multiple sources in and around the position
18: error circle. Of these, none can be confidently identified as the
19: infrared counterpart. The limiting magnitudes reached were $J=22.1$,
20: $H=20.7$ and $K_\textrm{S}=19.9$ (95\% confidence).
21: \end{abstract}
22: \maketitle
23:
24: \section{Introduction}
25: The Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs) are a small group of young,
26: energetic neutron stars, whose luminosity is thought to be powered by
27: the decay of a super-strong magnetic field: {\em magnetars} (Thompson
28: \& Duncan, 1996). Since the
29: discovery of the first optical counterpart to an AXP (Hulleman, van
30: Kerkwijk \& Kulkarni, 2000), searches have been undertaken to identify
31: further optical and infrared counterparts in different colours. Due to
32: the large extinction to most of these sources, the infrared has proved
33: the more successful route. See Woods \& Thompson (2004) for a review
34: of the AXPs and their counterparts to date.
35:
36: 1E~1841$-$045 is located within the supernova remnant Kes~73, and has
37: a pulse period of 11.8s and a soft X-ray spectrum well-fitted by
38: either a black-body plus power-law or the sum of two black-bodies
39: with a fitted hydrogen absorption column of
40: $N_H=2.5\times10^{22}$cm$^{-1}$ (Morii et al., 2003; Gotthelf et al.,
41: 2004). As a recent
42: surprise, this source was found by
43: Kuiper at al. (2004) to have hard, pulsed X-ray emission with a rising
44: power-law spectrum out to about 100keV. Since this, then, dominates
45: the emission energetics, it has prompted an ongoing revisal of
46: magnetar electrodynamics.
47:
48: The supernova remnant Kes~73,
49: has an estimated age of $\sim$1500yrs (e.g. Gotthelf et al., 2002) and
50: using H~I
51: measurements towards the SNR, its distance has been determined as 6--7.5kpc (Sanbonmatsu
52: \& Helfand, 1992). Geometric alignment and the youth of
53: both the SNR and AXP (whose age is not easily determined, but is
54: of the order thousand of years) point to the association of the two being
55: real.
56:
57: Mereghetti et al. (2001) were the first to search for an infrared/optical
58: counterpart to 1E~1841$-$045 by performing multi-colour imaging and
59: selected spectroscopy, but based on only {\em ROSAT} and {\em
60: Einstein} positions.
61:
62: Wachter et al. (2004) report a precise location for the AXP based on
63: new {\em Chandra} observations. They give the source's coordinates as
64: RA=18:41:19.343, Dec=-04:56:11.16, with a $3\sigma$ error radius of
65: $0.9''$. The images presented by these authors show an object in the
66: error circle that is either extended or made up of multiple sources.
67:
68: Here we present deeper images taken in better seeing, from which we
69: attempt to identify the infrared counterpart to 1E~1841$-$045.
70:
71: \section{Observation and analysis}
72: We imaged the field of 1E~1841-045 on the night of 5th June 2003 with
73: PANIC (Persson's Auxiliary Nasmyth
74: Infrared Camera, Martini et al., 2004), the 1k$\times$1k infrared imaging
75: array with $0.125''$ pixels on the Magellan Clay
76: Telescope\footnote{see {\tt
77: http://www.ociw.edu/lco/magellan/instruments/PANIC/panic/}}, under
78: excellent conditions. The total integration times were 1125s in J,
79: 1825s in K$_\textrm{S}$, and 1825s in H, at seeing
80: of $\simeq0.35''$. A second J-band
81: integration was performed, but the seeing had
82: deteriorated, and so this is not included in the analysis.
83:
84: Standard reduction was carried out to flat field and combine the frames using {\tt
85: IRAF}. The flat fields were derived by median combining many images
86: in each filter of a less crowded field. This proved more successful
87: than either screen flats or median images from the data frames
88: themselves. Photometry was
89: performed using {\tt DAOPHOT~II} (Stetson, 1987).
90:
91: In order to calibrate the frames, short-exposure images were obtained
92: of standard stars, from Persson et al. (1998). Because of some light
93: cloud in patches on the
94: night in question, it was found more reliable to use standards from the
95: following night and find the magnitude transformation from one night
96: to the next using fields which were imaged on both nights (see Durant
97: \& van Kerkwijk, 2005). The offsets
98: were small in each band, $\simeq0.03$mag. The standards were taken at a
99: range of airmasses, so the zero point at the appropriate airmass could
100: be found (the variation with airmass is slight in the infrared in any
101: case).
102:
103: The magnitudes found for stars in the field tend to be fainter than
104: those found by Wachter et al. (2004) and Mereghetti et
105: al. (2001) by typically 0.3mag for their faintest stars (note that
106: there are also some substantial differences in the magnitudes presented by
107: these two sets of authors). This can be
108: attributed to the better seeing conditions,
109: which allowed sources to be separated which would otherwise have been
110: blended in this extremely crowded field. Many of the stars
111: measured by Mereghetti et al. (2001) are saturated on our deeper
112: images, and so cannot be compared. We believe that the better
113: separation of sources entirely explains the discrepancy in measured
114: magnitudes.
115:
116: An astrometric solution was found for the images based on 2MASS
117: sources (Curti et al., 2003) in the field. 86 stars were matched for J
118: in the $\simeq
119: 2'\times 2'$ field, and after rejecting large residuals, the RMS
120: deviation in each coordinate was $\simeq0.1''$ with 71 points. The
121: error in connecting this image to the others is negligible in
122: comparison. The astrometric uncertainty is in connecting our images to the 2MASS
123: reference frame. Since Wachter et al.'s coordinates are also based on
124: 2MASS stars, there should be no additional uncertainty in the astrometry.
125:
126: \section{Results}
127:
128: Figure \ref{pics} shows the stacked images, with the position error
129: circle of radius $0.9''$ (3-$\sigma$ confidence) derived
130: by Wachter et al. (2004) overdrawn. Table \ref{mags} gives the magnitudes of
131: stars in and around the circle, as labelled on the images, and Figure
132: \ref{cc} shows those stars with three measured magnitudes on a
133: colour-colour diagramme compared to the rest of the stars in the
134: field.
135:
136: \begin{figure}
137: \begin{center}
138: \parbox{\hsize}{
139: \includegraphics[width=0.45\hsize,angle=270]{f1a.eps}
140: \includegraphics[width=0.45\hsize,angle=270]{f1b.eps}
141: \includegraphics[width=0.45\hsize,angle=270]{f1c.eps}}
142: \caption{Images of the field of 1E~1841-045 in the K$_\textrm{S}$-
143: (top-left), H- (top right)
144: and J-bands (bottom). In the left hand image are labelled
145: the stars whose magnitudes are presented in Table \ref{mags}}\label{pics}
146: \end{center}
147: \end{figure}
148:
149: \begin{figure}[p]
150: \includegraphics[width=\hsize,angle=0]{f2.eps}
151: \caption{Colour-colour diagramme of stars in the field of
152: 1E~1841$-$045. The stars in or close to the {\em Chandra}
153: error circle are labelled with letters. Only stars with magnitude
154: errors less than 0.15 in each band are plotted (comparable to stars
155: C and D). Bigger symbols represent stars with lower magnitude errors
156: in all three bands. The dashed line shows the effect of five
157: magnitudes of visual extinction. AXPs are expected to lie below the
158: bulk of the stars in this diagramme, based on 4U~0142+61 (Israel et
159: al., 2004).}\label{cc}
160: \end{figure}
161:
162:
163: From Figure \ref{cc}, one sees that,
164: of the stars near the positional error circle (see Figure \ref{pics}),
165: none have significantly different colours to other stars in the
166: field. Note that the large scatter is due to the extreme crowding
167: in the field, particularly in K. This means that the measured
168: magnitude of a given star can be strongly affected by the halo of a
169: neighbouring brighter star. The magnitude limits reached at 95\%
170: confidence are: $J=22.1$, $H=20.7$ and $K_\textrm{S}=19.9$.
171:
172: \begin{deluxetable}{clllll}
173: \tablecaption{Positions and magnitudes of stars within or near the {\em Chandra}
174: error circle. \label{mags}}
175: \tablewidth{0pt}
176: \tablehead{\colhead{Star ID\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{R. A.} &
177: \colhead{Dec} & \colhead{J} &
178: \colhead{H} & \colhead{K$_\textrm{S}$} }
179: \startdata
180: A & 18:41:19.293 & -04:56:10.67 & 20.96(9) & 19.35(6) & 18.44(7) \\
181: B & 18:41:19.388 & -04:56:10.28 & $>22.1$ & 20.8(4) & 19.6(2) \\
182: C & 18:41:19.327 & -04:56:11.57 & 21.28(12) & 19.90(11) & 19.44(18) \\
183: D & 18:41:19.356 & -04:56:11.23 & 21.38(14) & 19.90(11) & 19.32(15) \\
184: E & 18:41:19.315 & -04:56:12.20 & 22.2(3) & 20.9(5) & 20.9(6) \\
185: F & 18:41:19.352 & -04:56:12.15 & 22.1(3) & 19.47(7) & 18.09(5) \\
186: G & 18:41:19.367 & -04:56:11.64 & 19.93(4) & 19.09(5) & 18.89(9) \\
187: H & 19:41:19.435 & -04:56:11.13 & 18.97(3) & 17.90(3) & 17.40(4) \\
188: I & 19:41:19.401 & -04:56:12.15 & $>22.1$ & 20.04(13) & 19.14(12) \\
189: J & 18:41:19.421 & -04:56:12.24 & 20.82(8) & 19.57(8) & 18.99(10)
190: \enddata
191: \tablecomments{~Magnitude limits are at 95\% confidence. The systematic
192: uncertainty in position does not affect relative co-ordinates.}
193: \tablenotetext{a}{as labelled in Figure \ref{pics}. }
194: \end{deluxetable}
195:
196: By fitting the X-ray spectrum with an absorbed black body plus
197: power-law spectrum, a value for the hydrogen column density can be
198: derived. Assuming the Predehl \& Schmitt (1995) relationship, this
199: translates to an extinction towards the source of $A_V\approx14$. With
200: the caveat that the intrinsic X-ray spectrum is not known, this
201: number provides an approximate measure of reddening. Figure
202: \ref{cc} shows that the effect of extinction means that one cannot
203: distinguish between an intrinsically hot but highly extincted source
204: and an intrinsically cool (i.e. red) source. Also note that, since
205: the main sequence is known to start around (0,0) on this diagramme,
206: the bluest sources here have $A_V\approx2$, although extinction is
207: known to increase rapidly in this direction (e.g. Drimmel et al.,
208: 2003).
209:
210: Although an out-lier on Figure \ref{cc}, Star F is consistent with
211: being a very highly reddened red super-giant. De-reddening it with
212: $A_V=14$ would not place it below the bulk of the stars, as is the
213: case with 4U~0142+61 ($H-K_\textrm{S}=1.0(1)$, $J-H=1.2(2)$, Israel et
214: al., 2004, Hulleman et al., 2004). Whether these two objects
215: would be expected to have the same spectrum is an open question, as is
216: the appropriate value of reddening. Those AXPs with confirmed infrared
217: counterparts appear to have similar X-ray to infrared flux ratios
218: (Durant \& van Kerkwijk, 2005), and Star F would have both a much
219: brighter counterpart and much lower X-ray to infrared flux ratio than
220: 4U~0142+61. Although stars with colours as red
221: as Star F are rare in the field, it cannot be presented as a likely
222: counterpart. It is worth mentioning that Star B, if close to the the magnitude
223: limit in J, would fall in the right region of Figure \ref{cc}, but
224: again this can hardly be more than a suggestion of a candidate
225: counterpart.
226:
227: Comparing with the spectrum of 4U~0142+61 again (the brightest and best-measured
228: AXP, $J=22.3(1)$, $H=21.1(1)$,
229: $K_\textrm{S}=20.15(8)$), one would expect 1E1841$-$0145's magnitudes
230: to fall beyond the magnitude limits
231: given above, especially if the nominal reddening values to the two sources
232: are to be believed (which would make the magnitudes above fainter by about
233: 2.5, 1.7 and 1.1 magnitudes respectively). Thus a non-detection here
234: does not imply that the
235: two spectra are necessarily different, but does demonstrate that this part of
236: the sky is so crowded that finding the counterpart will prove very
237: difficult.
238:
239: In conclusion, we have found the magnitudes of several sources in or
240: near the accurate {\em Chandra} error circle for the position of
241: 1E~1841$-$045. Despite the depth and quality of the images, we find no
242: source which can be confidently presented as the likely
243: counterpart. Extremely deep images with narrow point-spread functions
244: will be required in order to find the counterpart to this AXP.
245:
246: \begin{thebibliography}{}
247: \bibitem{2mass}
248: Curti, R. et al. (2003) VizieR On-line Data Catalog:
249: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and
250: Infrared
251: Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC/California Institute of
252: Technology)
253: \bibitem{dust}
254: Drimmel, R., Cabrera-Lavers, A. \& L\'opez-Corredoira, M., 2003,
255: A\&A, 409, 205
256: \bibitem{me}
257: Durant, M., van Kerkwijk, M., 2005, ApJ, in press
258: \bibitem{gott}
259: Gotthelf, E., Gavriil, F., Kaspi, V., Vasisht, G., Chakrabarty, D.,
260: 2002, ApJ, 564, L31
261: \bibitem{mine}
262: Gotthelf, E., Halpern, J., Buxton, M., Bailyn, C., 2004., ApJ, 605, 368
263: \bibitem{H02}
264: Hulleman, F., van Kerkwijk, M., \& Kulkarni, S., 2000, Nature, 408,
265: 689
266: \bibitem{H04}
267: Hulleman, F., van Kerkwijk, M., \& Kulkarni, S., 2004, A\&A, 416, 1037
268: \bibitem{4u}
269: Israel, G., Stella, L., Covino, S., Campana, S., Angelini, L.,
270: Mignani, R., Mereghetti, S., Marconi, G. \& Perna, R., 2004, in Young
271: Neutron Stars and Their Environments, IAU Symposium 218
272: \bibitem{belt}
273: Kuiper, L., Hermsen, W. \& Mendez, M, 2004, ApJ, 613, 1173
274: \bibitem{mart}
275: Martini, P., Persson, S., Murphy, D., Birk, C., Shectman, S.,
276: Gunnels, S., Koch, E., 2004, {\tt astro-ph/0406666}
277: \bibitem{search}
278: Mereghetti, S., Mignani, R., Covino, S., Chaty, S., Israel, G.,
279: Neuh\"auser, R., Plana, H., Stella, L., 2001, MNRAS, 321, 143
280: \bibitem{morii}
281: Morii, M., Sato, R., Kataoka, J. \& Kawai, N., 2003, PASJ, 55, L45
282: \bibitem{standard}
283: Persson, S., Murphy, D., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., Rieke, M., 1998,
284: ApJ, 116, 2475
285: \bibitem{red}
286: Predehl, P., Schmitt, J., 1995, A\&A, 293, 889
287: \bibitem{S+H}
288: Sanbonmatsu, K., Helfand, D., 1992, AJ, 104, 2189
289: \bibitem{dao}
290: Stetson, P., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
291: \bibitem{T+C}
292: Thompson, C. \& Duncan, R., 1996, ApJ, 473, 322
293: \bibitem{wach}
294: Wachter, S., Patel, S., Kouveliotou, C., Bouchet, P., \"{O}zel, F.,
295: Tennant, A., Woods, P., Hurley, K., Becker, W., \& Slane, P., 2004,
296: ApJ, accepted ({\tt astro-ph/0408266})
297: \bibitem{wood}
298: Woods, P., \& Thompson, C., 2004, in ``Compact stellar X-ray sources'',
299: eds Lewin, W., van der Klis, M.
300:
301: \end{thebibliography}
302: \end{document}
303: