1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Draft version: Avishay, Aug. 8, 2003

5: %%

6: %% This is a manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The command below calls the preprint style

10: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

11: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

12: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

13: 

14: %\documentclass{aastex}

15: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}

16: 

17: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

18: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

19: %\usepackage{natbib}

20: 

21: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

22: 

23: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

24: 

25: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

26: 

27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

28: 

29: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

30: 

31: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

32: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

33: %% the \begin{document} command.

34: %%

35: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

36: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

37: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

38: %% for information.

39: 

40: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

41: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

42: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu

43:              \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

44: 

45: % Define "less than or approximately" symbol.

46: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}

47: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}

48: % Define "greater than or approximately" symbol.

49: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}

50: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}

51: 

52: \newcommand{\xray}{\mbox{X-ray}}

53: \newcommand{\hst}{\textit{HST}}

54: 

55: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

56: 

57: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}

58: 

59: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

60: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

61: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

62: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

63: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

64: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

65: 

66: %\shorttitle{Collapsed Cores in Globular Clusters}

67: %\shortauthors{Djorgovski et al.}

68: 

69: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

70: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

71: 

72: \begin{document}

73: 

74: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

75: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

76: %% you desire.

77: 

78: \title{A high angular-resolution search for the progenitor of

79:        the type Ic Supernova 2004gt}

80: 

81: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

82: %% author and affiliation information.

83: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

84: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

85: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

86: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

87: 

88: \author{Avishay Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{1}

89: D.~B.~Fox, S.~R.~Kulkarni, K.~Matthews, D.~C.~Leonard\altaffilmark{2}, 

90: D.~J.~Sand, D.-S.~Moon, S.~B.~Cenko, \& A.~M.~Soderberg}

91: \affil{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of 

92:      Technology, Pasadena, CA\,91125, USA}

93: \email{avishay@astro.caltech.edu}

94: 

95: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

96: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

97: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

98: %% affiliation.

99: 

100: \altaffiltext{1}{Hubble Fellow.}

101: \altaffiltext{2}{NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow.}

102: 

103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

107: %% editorial office after submission.

108: 

109: \begin{abstract}

110: 

111: We report the results of a high-spatial-resolution search for

112: the progenitor of type Ic supernova SN\,2004gt, using the newly commissioned Keck

113: laser-guide star adaptive optics system (LGSAO) along with archival

114: \textit{Hubble Space Telescope} data.

115: This is the deepest search yet performed for the progenitor of any

116: type Ib/c event in a wide wavelength range stretching from the 

117: far UV to the near IR. We determine that the progenitor of SN\,2004gt

118: was most likely less luminous than $M_V=-5.5$ and $M_B=-6.5$ magnitudes.

119: The massive stars exploding as hydrogen-deficient

120: core-collapse supernovae (SNe) should have lost their outer hydrogen envelopes

121: prior to their explosion, either through winds -- such stars are identified 

122: within our Galaxy as as Wolf-Rayet (W-R) stars -- or to a binary companion. 

123: The luminosity limits we set rule out more than half of the known galactic

124: W-R stars as possible progenitors of this event. In particular, 

125: they imply that a W-R progenitor should have been among the more-evolved (highly

126: stripped, less luminous) of these stars, a concrete constraint on its

127: evolutionary state just prior to core collapse. The possibility of a less 

128: luminous, lower-mass binary progenitor cannot be constrained. This study

129: demonstrates the power of LGS observations in furthering our

130: understanding of core collapse, and the physics powering supernovae, GRBs and

131: XRFs.

132: 

133: \end{abstract}

134: 

135: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

136: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

137: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

138: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

139: 

140: \keywords{supernovae: general}

141: 

142: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

143: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

144: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

145: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

146: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

147: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

148: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

149: %% each reference.

150: 

151: \section{Introduction}

152: 

153: Stars with masses greater than about ten times the mass of the Sun end their

154: lives with a catastrophic core collapse that explodes the stellar

155: envelope, producing a core-collapse supernova (SN).  Understanding the

156: nature of these cosmic explosions in detail requires knowledge of the

157: properties of their progenitor stars.  The progenitors of the most

158: common type of core-collapse SNe (hydrogen-rich or type II) have

159: been identified (White and Malin 1987; Aldering, Humphreys, \& Richmond

160: 1994; Van Dyk, Li, \& Filippenko 2003a; Smartt et al. 2003) as luminous supergiants.  

161: 

162: By contrast, the observational constraints on the progenitors of the

163: hydrogen-poor type Ib and Ic events (Filippenko 1997) are minimal.

164: Previous progenitor searches (Barth et al. 1996; Smartt et al. 2002; 

165: Van Dyk, Li, \& Filippenko 2003b; Maund \& Smartt 2005) utilizing pre-explosion 

166: images from the ground or from \textit{HST} have so far yielded upper limits that

167: were not sensitive enough to constrain the nature of the exploding star.   

168: This is unfortunate, because a small fraction of these events produce, 

169: as they die, not only a SN but also a gamma-ray

170: burst (GRB; e.g., Galama et al. 1998; Stanek et al. 2003; Hjorth et al. 2003; 

171: Malesani et al. 2004) or an \xray\ flash (XRF; Soderberg et al. 2005)

172: -- in the process, radiating an energy many times that of the

173: brightest SNe. Constraining the properties of evolved massive stars

174: that give rise to SNe Ib and Ic may lead to better understanding of the 

175: physics of these explosions, and may prove to be a key to successful 

176: modelling of GRBs and XRFs that are sometimes associated with such events.

177: 

178: Here, we present the deepest yet search for the progenitor of type Ic SN 2004gt,

179: using Keck laser-guide-star assisted adaptive-optics (LGSAO) observations ($\S~2$) to

180: pinpoint its location to within $0.06$ arc seconds and 

181: overcome source confusion in pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope 

182: ({\it HST}) data, a major limitation in some previous studies. We impose the first far UV, and deepest yet

183: optical and IR, upper limits on the luminosity of the SN progenitor ($\S~3$). 

184: These rule out a luminous ($M_V<-5.5$, $M_B<-6.5$)

185: Wolf-Rayet (W-R) star exploding as SN 2004gt. Similar results based on 

186: the localization of this SN using recent {\it HST} data, and an 

187: independent analysis of the archival data set, are presented by 

188: Maund et al. (2005) in this issue. 

189: 

190: \section{Observations}

191: 

192: On 28.48 January 2005 UT, forty seven days after the first

193: report (Monard 2004) about the type Ic (Ganeshalingam, Swift, 

194: Serduke, \& Filippenko 2004) supernova SN~2004gt, we undertook high angular resolution

195: observations in the 2.2-$\mu$m ($K_s$) band of the SN and its

196: vicinity using the wide-field channel (0.04 arcsecond/pixel)

197: of the Near Infra-Red Camera 2 (NIRC2) operated behind the

198: newly commissioned Laser Guide Star (LGS) assisted

199: Adaptive Optics (LGSAO; Wizinowich et al. 2004) system mounted on the Keck II

200: 10-m telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii.  

201: An artificial beacon is created in the sky by 

202: shining a strong laser beam, tuned to the resonance line of sodium,

203: up into a sodium-rich layer, usually located at an altitude of

204: $\approx90$\,km. Using the beacon, the adverse blurring effects of the 

205: lower altitude atmosphere are measured and then corrected by a deformable 

206: mirror. The laser beacon is insensitive to tip-tilt corrections but 

207: we were able to use the SN itself for this purpose.

208: The data were reduced in the standard manner, with

209: bias-subtraction, flatfielding, fringe calculation and subtraction,

210: image registration, cosmic ray identification, cosmic ray and

211: bad-pixel masking, and final image combination performed using custom

212: software within the Pyraf environment.  

213: The resulting images, with full width at half maximum (FWHM) 

214: of 0.13\,arcseconds (more than 3 LGS pixels, so well-sampled), 

215: have exquisite resolution (Figure~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}), comparable 

216: to the angular resolution of images produced by the {\it Hubble 

217: Space Telescope} (HST).

218: 

219: HST observations of the vicinity of SN\,2004gt prior to

220: its explosion were extracted from the HST archive. Available data 

221: include Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) imaging in the 

222: F336W (4500s), F439W (4000s), F555W (4400s) and F814W 

223: (2000s) bands ($UBVI$ respectively, hereafter) 

224: obtained during January 20, 1996. The location of SN 2004gt falls on

225: the better-sampled (but less sensitive) PC chip, with pixel scale

226: 0.05 arcsecond/pixel. Additionally, we examined a single 720s far-UV image 

227: obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) using the far-UV MAMA

228: detector and the F25SRF2 filter, obtained on June 21, 1999. The

229: WFPC2 data were reduced by custom software using elements from the 

230: DRIZZLE (Fruchter \& Hook 2002) 

231: IRAF package (see Sand et al. 2005) and photometered using the

232: HSTPHOT package (Dolphin et al. 2000).  

233: 

234: \section{Upper limits on the luminosity of the progenitor of SN 2004gt}

235: 

236: Our LGSAO observations of SN~2004gt were motivated by three reasons.

237: First, the empirical constraints on progenitors of type Ic supernovae

238: are poor ($\S~1$). Second, there exists a treasure trove of

239: archival (pre-supernova) HST observations of NGC~4038/4039, covering

240: the entire UV/optical wavelength range (1500\,\AA\ to 9000\,\AA; $\S~2$). 

241: Third, the exquisite image quality of the LGSAO images means that we can

242: pinpoint the location of the SN, and hence its progenitor, among 

243: the numerous stars and star clusters visible in this part of the host galaxy

244: (see Figure~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}).

245: 

246: We register the Keck-LGS $K_s$-band and archival \hst\ $I$-band

247: images in the following manner. 

248: We choose the $I$-band \hst\ image to minimize the effect

249: of any wavelength-dependent centroid shifts for objects used in the

250: registration.  We perform coarse alignment using six bright sources,

251: and then make a finer alignment using the eleven sources indicated by

252: circles in panels Figure~\ref{fig:register} (a) and (b).  

253: The IRAF tasks ``geomap'' and

254: ``geotran'' are used throughout, and a general second-order 

255: transformation is applied.  

256: We then register the remaining \hst\ images against the $I$-band image

257: using the same tasks.  We determine the

258: final uncertainty in the SN location on the pre-explosion \hst\ images

259: by adding in quadrature the SN centroiding error

260: (Fig.~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}), the RMS error in the \hst\ $I$-band to Keck

261: $K_s$-band registration, and (where relevant) the RMS error in

262: registration between the \hst\ $I$-band image and the target image.

263: We find 1$\sigma$ total uncertainties of 0.24 to 0.31 Keck (LGS)

264: pixels depending on the band ($\sim$0.01\,arcsecond).

265: Figs.~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}(b) and \ref{fig:HST} show the final 5$\sigma$

266: error circles.

267: 

268: As can be seen from

269: Figure~\ref{fig:HST}(a)-(d) we could not identify any distinct progenitor

270: star at the location of SN~2004gt in any of the available archival HST 

271: images. Following Gal-Yam et al. (2004a) we estimate our limiting magnitude for an

272: associated point source (progenitor star) as follows.  We derive our

273: photometric zero-points from bright and well-isolated stars using the

274: \textit{HSTPHOT} package (Dolphin 2000). Introducing

275: artificial stars of progressively fainter magnitude (panels e-g, where

276: the $B$-band image is used for illustration) at locations (indicated

277: by stars) with background levels consistent with the location of

278: SN\,2004gt (indicated by the circle), we determine the limiting

279: magnitude for detection of a point-source (f), as contrasted with the

280: brightest non-detection (g).  We derive limiting magnitudes of

281: $m_U=22.7 \pm 0.5$, $m_B=24.65 \pm 0.15$, $m_V=25.5 \pm 0.15$ and

282: $m_I=24.4 \pm 0.3$, where our errors are dominated by the uncertainty

283: in the local zero point.

284: %

285: The far-UV STIS data (h) present a special case, as this

286: detector-filter combination has not been extensively calibrated.

287: First, we note that although a single pixel near the SN location

288: appears elevated, it is only a 1.5$\sigma$ excursion above the

289: brightness of nearby pixels and is derived from a single image.

290: Second, our estimated limiting magnitude of $m_{far UV}=23.4$ is

291: calculated via photometric coefficients in the image header ($PHOTFLAM

292: = 3.951175 \times 10^{17}$ and $PHOTZPT = -21.1$), and using a

293: 0.5\,arcsecond aperture.

294: 

295: Adopting the most recently determined distance to the Antennae

296: galaxies, $d=13.8 \pm 1.7$ Mpc (Saviane, Hibbard, \& Rich 2004) 

297: the magnitude limits result in the progenitor star being fainter 

298: than $1.25 \times 10^4$ solar luminosities in the $V$ band.  

299: The corresponding absolute magnitudes are $M_U> -8.0$, $M_B >-6.05$, 

300: $M_V >-5.2$ and $M_I >-6.3$.  These limits are $\approx 2-10$ times 

301: tighter than any previously obtained ($\S~1$). 

302: 

303: It is important to quantify the effect of interstellar dust between us and the

304: supernova. In this direction interstellar extinction

305: by Galactic dust is small, $E_{B-V}=0.012$ mag (Burstein \& Heiles 1982) 

306: to 0.046 mag (Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis 1998). Whitmore

307: et al. (1999) report their photometric and spectroscopic analysis is 

308: consistent with the lower value of the two which they consider negligible, 

309: and which we also adopt (but do not neglect) here. In the same work, the

310: extinction, inferred from HST ultra-violet (UV) spectroscopy, of

311: the star cluster clearly seen in the vicinity of SN~2004gt

312: (Figure~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}) is also low, $E_{B-V}=0.01 \pm 0.04$ mag

313: (Whitmore et al. 1999).

314: The equivalent width, $W$, of the Na~I D-absorption lines in SN

315: spectra has been argued (Turatto, Benetti, \& Cappellaro 2002) 

316: to be a tracer of interstellar

317: gas (and thus also of dust). From a spectrum of SN~2004gt 

318: obtained using the DBSP spectrograph mounted on the 200" Hale

319: telescope at Palomar Observatory as part of the CCCP program 

320: (Gal-Yam et al. 2004b) we measure $W=0.6\,$\AA,

321: leading to $E_{B-V}=0.09$ to 0.27\,mag.  

322: In view of the small extinction towards the nearby

323: cluster, we favor the lower value of extinction for the SN

324: itself. Thus, assuming $E_{B-V}=0.012$ mag and $E_{B-V}=0.09$ mag 

325: for the Galactic and host extinction, respectively,

326: we find the extinction-corrected limits $M_U> -8.6$, $M_B >-6.5$, 

327: $M_V >-5.5$ and $M_I>-6.5$. 

328: 

329: \section{Discussion and conclusions}

330: 

331: SNe of type Ib and Ic exhibit no hydrogen in their spectrum.

332: Their progenitors must be massive stars which have lost their

333: hydrogen envelope. This could result from wind-driven mass-loss 

334: is very massive stars, $M>25-40 M_{\odot}$ according to different models (see,

335: e.g., Maeder \& Conti 1994 for a review) -- such stars are identified locally as

336: Wolf-Rayet (W-R) stars. Alternatively, a lower-mass star in a close binary system

337: may lose its outer envelope through interaction with its companion 

338: (see Podsiadlowski et al. 2004 and references therein).

339:  

340: Within the W-R class, the observed range of spectral properties has been

341: further mapped onto an evolutionary path (Maeder \& Conti 1994).  

342: Of those W-R stars whose spectra are dominated by helium and nitrogen features,

343: consistent with products of hydrogen burning via the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen

344: cycle, the cooler but more luminous (``late'') WNL stars are believed

345: to be less evolved than the hotter, but less luminous (``early'') WNE stars.

346: Members of the WC and WO subclasses, whose carbon and oxygen-dominated

347: compositions are indicative of helium fusion products, are thought to be more

348: evolved still, displaying material from the deeper stellar layers on their 

349: highly stripped surface.

350: 

351: Our observations allow us to conclude that the progenitor of SN~2004gt

352: was fainter than the median star in the compilation (Vacca \& Torres-Dodgen

353: 1990) of Galactic WR stars\footnotemark. 

354: \footnotetext{We correct the narrow-band $v$ magnitudes given by Vacca \& 

355: Torres-Dodgen (1990) to broad-band (Johnson) $V$ magnitudes (similar to the

356: F555W WFPC2 filter we analyze) by applying individual $V-v$ corrections

357: to each star which we derive using the SIMBAD database.}  

358: More importantly, on luminosity grounds, the

359: progenitor is not a WNL star, since, adopting our estimated

360: extinction and distance to the Antennae, we would have detected 

361: every WNL star listed by Vacca and Torres-Dodgen (1990).  This clue -- that the progenitor

362: of SN 2004gt, if a W-R star, must have been a WNE, WC or WO star -- directly suggests that

363: type Ic supernova explosions, deficient in both hydrogen and

364: helium, result from evolved progenitors. An immediate corollary would

365: be that progenitors of type Ib SNe (hydrogen poor, but helium-rich)

366: could be among the less-evolved and more luminous WNL stars. 

367: This finding is in general accord

368: with our current theoretical understanding of how stars evolve, and

369: constitutes the first direct support of this picture. 

370: We note that SN Ib/c models invoking less massive, lower-luminosity

371: progenitors in binary systems, cannot be constrained by our observations.

372: 

373: The observations presented here bode well for making rapid progress

374: in relating the types of SNe to their progenitors, a subject

375: currently dominated primarily by theory and models. LGS observations

376: on large-aperture telescopes have the necessary sensitivity and 

377: precision to routinely localize SNe relative

378: to archival high resolution images of their host galaxies. Currently

379: the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} provides the best archive of nearby

380: galaxies. However, as LGS methodology becomes more common it is

381: quite conceivable to undertake a dedicated program of imaging the $\approx1000$ 

382: nearest galaxies known to contain significant populations of massive stars,

383: in preparation for future SNe. The goal of this effort would be to

384: empirically link the nature of exploding stars and the properties of

385: the resulting explosions, from which we can understand the

386: physical processes that govern one of Nature's most

387: dramatic events, the explosions of dying stars as SNe,

388: gamma-ray bursts and X-ray flashes.

389: 

390: %\section*{Note added}

391: %

392: %While this manuscript was being refereed, similar

393: %work by Maund, Smartt, \& Schweizer (submitted to ApJL) has become 

394: %public. These authors use late-time {\it HST} data to localize

395: %SN 2004gt, and analyze the same pre-explosion WFPC2 data. The 

396: %SN localization and progenitor upper limits they derive appear to agree with 

397: %our results, as do their estimated dust extinction, leading

398: %them to arrive at similar conclusions.

399: 

400: \section*{Acknowledgments}

401: 

402: A.G. acknowledges support by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant

403: \#HST-HF-01158.01-A awarded by STScI, which is operated by AURA, Inc.,

404: for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.  D.C.L. is supported by a

405: National Science Foundation (NSF) Astronomy and Astrophysics

406: Postdoctoral Fellowship under award AST-0401479.

407: A.M.S. and D.J.S are supported through the NASA Graduate Student 

408: Research Program, under NASA grant NAGT-50449.

409: SRK's research is supported by NSF and NASA.

410: We thank C. Gelino, D. Maoz and G. P. Smith for help and advice.

411: We acknowledge helpful comments from an anonymous referee.

412: 

413: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,

414: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments

415: %% command.

416: 

417: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

418: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

419: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

420: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

421: %% text to be printed in the second.

422: 

423: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

424: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

425: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

426: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

427: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

428: %%

429: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

430: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

431: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

432: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

433: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

434: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

435: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

436: %% place of the \cite commands.

437: 

438: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

439: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

440: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

441: 

442: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

443: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

444: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

445: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

446: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

447: 

448: \clearpage

449: 

450: \begin{thebibliography}{}

451: 

452: \bibitem[]{512} Aldering, G., Humphreys, R.~M., \& Richmond, M.\ 1994, \aj, 107, 662 

453: \bibitem[]{513} Barth, A.~J., van Dyk, S.~D., Filippenko, A.~V., Leibundgut, B., 

454: \& Richmond, M.~W.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 2047 

455: \bibitem[]{515} Burstein, D., \& Heiles, C.\ 1982, \aj, 87, 1165 

456: \bibitem[]{516} Dolphin, A.~E.\ 2000, \pasp, 112, 1383 

457: \bibitem[]{517} Filippenko, A.~V.\ 1997, \araa, 35, 309

458: \bibitem[]{518} Fruchter, A.~S., \& Hook, R.~N.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 144

459: \bibitem[]{519} Galama, T.~J.,~et al.\ 1998, \nat, 395, 670

460: \bibitem[]{520} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\ 2004a, \apjl, 609, L59 

461: \bibitem[]{521} Gal-Yam, A., Cenko, S.~B., Fox, D.~W., Leonard, D.~C., Moon, D.-S., Sand, D.~J.,

462: \& Soderberg, A.~M.\ 2004b, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 205,  

463: \bibitem[]{523} Ganeshalingam, M., Swift, B.~J., Serduke, F.~J.~D., \& Filippenko,

464: A.~V.\ 2004, \iaucirc, 8456, 4 

465: \bibitem[]{525} Hjorth, J.,~et al.\ 2003, \nat, 423, 847 

466: \bibitem[]{526} Maeder, A., \& Conti, P.~S.\ 1994, \araa, 32, 227 

467: \bibitem[]{527} Malesani, D., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 609, L5 

468: \bibitem[]{528} Maund, J.~R., \& Smartt, S.~J.\ 2005, \mnras, 360, 288 

469: \bibitem[]{529} Monard, L.~A.~G.\ 2004, \iaucirc, 8454, 1 

470: \bibitem[]{530} Podsiadlowski, P., Mazzali, P.~A., Nomoto, K., Lazzati, D., \& Cappellaro, E.\ 2004, \apjl, 607, L17

471: \bibitem[]{531} Sand, D.~J., Treu, T., Ellis, R.~S., \& Smith, G.~P.\ 2005,

472: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0502528 

473: \bibitem[]{533} Saviane, I., Hibbard, J.~E., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 660 

474: \bibitem[]{534} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525 

475: \bibitem[]{535} Smartt, S.~J., Vreeswijk, P.~M., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Gilmore, G.~F., Meikle, W.~P.~S., 

476: Ferguson, A.~M.~N., \& Knapen, J.~H.\ 2002, \apjl, 572, L147 

477: \bibitem[]{537} Smartt, S.~J., Maund, J.~R., Hendry, M.~A., Tout, C.~A., Gilmore, G.~F., Mattila, S., \& Benn, C.~R.\ 2004, Science, 303, 499

478: \bibitem[]{538} Soderberg, A.~M., et al.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0502553 

479: \bibitem[]{539} Stanek, K.~Z.,~et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 591, L17

480: \bibitem[]{540} Turatto, M., Benetti, S., \& Cappellaro, E.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0211219

481: \bibitem[]{541} Vacca, W.~D., \& Torres-Dodgen, A.~V.\ 1990, \apjs, 73, 685 

482: \bibitem[]{542} Van Dyk, S.~D., Hamuy, M., \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 2017 

483: \bibitem[]{543} Van Dyk, S.~D., Li, W., \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2003a, \pasp, 115, 1289 

484: \bibitem[]{544} Van Dyk, S.~D., Li, W., \& Filippenko, A.~V.\ 2003b, \pasp, 115, 1 

485: \bibitem[]{545} Wizinowich, P.~L., et al.\ 2004, \procspie, 5490, 1 

486: \bibitem[]{546} White, G.~L.,~\& Malin, D.~F.\ 1987, \nat, 327, 36

487: \bibitem[]{547} Whitmore, B.~C., Zhang, Q., Leitherer, C., Fall, S.~M., Schweitzer, F., \& Miller, 

488: B.~W.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 1551 

489:  

490: \end{thebibliography}

491: 

492: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include 

493: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

494: 

495: \clearpage

496: 

497: \begin{figure*}

498: %\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f1.eps}

499: \caption{

500: \newpage

501: {\bf (a)} Composite near-infrared ($JHK_s$) image of SN\,2004gt and

502: its host galaxy, the Antennae, taken on 16 January 2005 UT within the

503: context of our ongoing CCCP program at Palomar

504: Observatory (Gal-Yam et al. 2004b). The SN (centered within the red square) is

505: barely resolved from the bright cluster ``S'' to its

506: northwest (Whitmore et al. 1999).

507: {\bf (b)} The vicinity of SN\,2004gt (red square in panel a), prior to

508: its explosion, as seen in the far-UV to $I$-band by {\it HST}.  

509: The color composite

510: uses far UV (STIS 1450~\AA) and $U$-band (WFPC2 $3360$~\AA) images for

511: blue, $B$-band (WFPC2 $4390$~\AA) and $V$-band (WFPC2 $5550$~\AA)

512: images for green, and the $I$-band (WFPC2 $8140$~\AA) image for red.

513: The yellow circle gives our 5$\sigma$ uncertainty in the SN position

514: on this image (see Fig.~\ref{fig:register}).

515: {\bf (c)} SN\,2004gt and its immediate vicinity at high-resolution in

516: $K_s$-band (0.13\,arcsecond full-width at half-maximum). The SN location 

517: (indicated by the cross) is determined to $<$0.05\,pixel precision

518: (0.002\,arcsecond) using the centroid finding algorithm within IRAF.

519: } 

520: \label{fig:WIRC+LGS}

521: \end{figure*} 

522: 

523: \clearpage

524: 

525: \begin{figure*}

526: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f2.eps}

527: \caption{

528: Registration of Keck-LGS $K_s$-band (a) and archival \hst\ $I$-band

529: (b) images. Using 11 stars common to archival HST images and our LGS image (circled) we are

530: able to register SN~2004gt onto pre-explosion images, 

531: to within $<$0.06\,arcsecond, at 5-$\sigma$

532: confidence level. 

533: Figs.~\ref{fig:WIRC+LGS}(b) and \ref{fig:HST} show the final 5$\sigma$

534: error circles. Each panel is $28 \times 24$ arcseconds, North is up and East to 

535: the left.

536: } 

537: \label{fig:register}

538: \end{figure*}

539: 

540: \clearpage

541: 

542: \begin{figure*}

543: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f3.eps}

544: \caption{

545: Pre-explosion \hst\ images of the immediate vicinity of SN\,2004gt, in

546: five bands, and illustration of our sensitivity estimation method.

547: Coadded \hst\ images in the $U$ (a), $B$ (b), $V$ (c), and $I$-bands

548: (d) shows no point-like source within the 5$\sigma$ localization

549: region for the SN. Panels (e)-(g) demonstrate our sensitivity estimation

550: (the $B$-band data are shown for example). 

551: We insert artificial sources with known flux into locations 

552: (stars in panels (e)-(g)) with background levels similar to those 

553: we measure at the position of SN 2004gt (circle). Panel (e) shows

554: a clear detection while panel (f) a marginal one. We set our limit as the 

555: brightest non-detection (g).    

556: We find that any putative progenitor had to be fainter

557: than apparent magnitudes, $m_U=22.7$, $m_B=24.65$, $m_V=25.5$, $m_I=24.4$ and

558: $m_{\lambda=150{\rm nm}}=23.4$.

559: Panel (a)-(d) and (h) are $0.64 \times 0.64$ arcseconds across, while panels

560: (e)-(g) are $0.8 \times 0.8$ arcseconds. In all cases North is up and East 

561: is to the left.

562: } 

563: \label{fig:HST}

564: \end{figure*}

565: 

566: \end{document}

567: 

568: 

569: