1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: \def\lineunits{erg\ s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$}
4: \def\contunits{erg\ s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,\AA$^{-1}$}
5: \def\ergsec{erg\ s$^{-1}$}
6: \def\Fvar{\ifmmode F_{\rm var} \else $F_{\rm var}$\fi}
7: \def\Rmax{\ifmmode R_{\rm max} \else $R_{\rm max}$\fi}
8: \def\tcent{\ifmmode \tau_{\rm cent} \else $\tau_{\rm cent}$\fi}
9: \def\tpeak{\ifmmode \tau_{\rm peak} \else $\tau_{\rm peak}$\fi}
10: \def\rmax{\ifmmode r_{\rm max} \else $r_{\rm max}$\fi}
11: \def\MBH{\ifmmode M_{\rm BH} \else $M_{\rm BH}$\fi}
12: \def\sigstar{\ifmmode \sigma_* \else $\sigma_*$\fi}
13: \def\sigline{\ifmmode \sigma_{\rm line} \else $\sigma_{\rm line}$\fi}
14: \def\Msigma{\ifmmode M_{\rm BH}$--$\sigma_*
15: \else $M_{\rm BH}$--$\sigma_*$\fi}
16: \def\IUE{{\it IUE}}
17: \def\HST{{\it HST}}
18: \def\deg{$^{\rm o}$}
19: \def\degC{$^{\rm o}$C}
20: \def\arcsec{$''$}
21: \def\arcmin{$'$}
22: \def\degpoint{$^{\rm o}\!.$}
23: \def\arcsecpoint{$''\!.$}
24: \def\arcminpoint{$'\!.$}
25: \def\kms{\ifmmode {\rm km\ s}^{-1} \else km s$^{-1}$\fi}
26: \def\Msun{\ifmmode M_{\odot} \else $M_{\odot}$\fi}
27: \def\Lsun{\ifmmode L_{\odot} \else $L_{\odot}$\fi}
28: \def\qo{\ifmmode q_{\rm o} \else $q_{\rm o}$\fi}
29: \def\Ho{\ifmmode H_{\rm o} \else $H_{\rm o}$\fi}
30: \def\ho{\ifmmode h_{\rm o} \else $h_{\rm o}$\fi}
31: \def\ltsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{<}{\sim}\;$}}
32: \def\gtsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{>}{\sim}\;$}}
33: \def\vFWHM{\ifmmode v_{\mbox{\tiny FWHM}} \else
34: $v_{\mbox{\tiny FWHM}}$\fi}
35: \def\CCF{\ifmmode F_{\it CCF} \else $F_{\it CCF}$\fi}
36: \def\ACF{\ifmmode F_{\it ACF} \else $F_{\it ACF}$\fi}
37: \def\Halpha{\ifmmode {\rm H}\alpha \else H$\alpha$\fi}
38: \def\Hbeta{\ifmmode {\rm H}\beta \else H$\beta$\fi}
39: \def\Hgamma{\ifmmode {\rm H}\gamma \else H$\gamma$\fi}
40: \def\Hdelta{\ifmmode {\rm H}\delta \else H$\delta$\fi}
41: \def\Lya{\ifmmode {\rm Ly}\alpha \else Ly$\alpha$\fi}
42: \def\Lyb{\ifmmode {\rm Ly}\beta \else Ly$\beta$\fi}
43: \def\hi{H\,{\sc i}}
44: \def\hii{H\,{\sc ii}}
45: \def\hei{He\,{\sc i}}
46: \def\heii{He\,{\sc ii}}
47: \def\ci{C\,{\sc i}}
48: \def\cii{C\,{\sc ii}}
49: \def\ciii{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc iii} \else C\,{\sc iii}\fi}
50: \def\civ{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc iv} \else C\,{\sc iv}\fi}
51: \def\ni{N\,{\sc i}}
52: \def\nii{N\,{\sc ii}}
53: \def\niii{N\,{\sc iii}}
54: \def\niv{N\,{\sc iv}}
55: \def\nv{N\,{\sc v}}
56: \def\oi{O\,{\sc i}}
57: \def\oii{O\,{\sc ii}}
58: \def\oiii{O\,{\sc iii}}
59: \def\o5007{[O\,{\sc iii}]\,$\lambda5007$}
60: \def\oiv{O\,{\sc iv}}
61: \def\ov{O\,{\sc v}}
62: \def\ovi{O\,{\sc vi}}
63: \def\nev{Ne\,{\sc v}}
64: \def\mgi{Mg\,{\sc i}}
65: \def\mgii{Mg\,{\sc ii}}
66: \def\siIV{Si\,{\sc iv}}
67: \def\si{S\,{\sc i}}
68: \def\sii{S\,{\sc ii}}
69: \def\siii{S\,{\sc iii}}
70: \def\caii{Ca\,{\sc ii}}
71: \def\feii{Fe\,{\sc ii}}
72: \def\aliii{Al\,{\sc iii}}
73:
74: \shorttitle{}
75: \shortauthors{Peterson et al.}
76:
77: \begin{document}
78: \title{Erratum: ``Multiwavelength Monitoring of the Dwarf Seyfert 1
79: Galaxy NGC~4395. I. A Reverberation-Based
80: Measurement of the Black Hole Mass'' (ApJ, 632, 799 [2005])}
81: \author{
82: Bradley~M.~Peterson,
83: Misty~C.~Bentz,
84: Louis-Benoit~Desroches,
85: Alexei~V.~Filippenko,
86: Luis~C.~Ho,
87: Shai~Kaspi,
88: Ari~Laor,
89: Dan~Maoz,
90: Edward~C.~Moran,
91: Richard~W.~Pogge, and
92: Alice~C.~Quillen
93: }
94:
95: In the original version of this paper, we reported on
96: a series of ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopic
97: observations of the dwarf Seyfert 1 galaxy
98: NGC~4395, made with the
99: Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on
100: {\em Hubble Space Telescope (HST).}
101: Unfortunately, a data processing error led to an incorrect
102: flux calibration for these spectra. All STIS-based UV fluxes in
103: the original paper are too high by a factor of 7.96
104: as a result of
105: neglecting to adjust the flux-scaling algorithm from
106: a diffuse source to a point source.
107:
108: Because most of the analysis in the original paper involved
109: only relative flux changes, most of the scientific conclusions
110: are unaffected by this correction, except
111: for the slope of the broad-line region radius--luminosity relationship,
112: as described below.
113:
114: Specific changes that result from this correction are:
115: \begin{enumerate}
116: \item All of the values for the continuum and \civ\
117: emission-line fluxes and their associated uncertainties
118: in the electronic Tables 1 and 2 need
119: to be multiplied by a factor of 0.126.
120: \item The mean and rms fluxes in column (3) of Table 3 need to be
121: multipled by a factor of 0.126.
122: \item The luminosity entries for NGC~4395 in column (4) of Table 6
123: need to be multiplied by a factor of 0.126. A corrected version of
124: Table 6 is provided here.
125: \item The flux scales in Figs.\ 1, 2, and 5 should be multiplied by
126: a factor of 0.126.
127: \end{enumerate}
128:
129: The only substantive change resulting from this correction
130: is the relationship between the broad-line region radius,
131: as measured by the time response of the \civ\ emission line,
132: and the UV continuum luminosity. We show here the
133: corrected version of Fig.\ 6, based on the entries in the
134: corrected version of Table 6. The best fit power-law
135: relationship to these data is
136: \begin{equation}
137: \log R_{\rm BLR}{\mbox{\rm (lt-days)}} = (1.06 \pm 0.16) + (0.61 \pm
138: 0.05)\log \left( \frac{L_{\rm UV}}{10^{44}\,{\rm erg\ s}^{-1}}\right),
139: \end{equation}
140: which replaces eq.\ (3) in the original paper.
141: The slope $\alpha = 0.61 \pm 0.05$ is in much better agreement with the
142: slope of the radius--luminosity relationship of
143: S.\ Kaspi et al.\ (ApJ, 629, 61 [2005]) for
144: \Hbeta\ and the UV continuum,
145: $\alpha = 0.56 \pm 0.05$.
146:
147:
148: \begin{figure}
149: \figurenum{6}
150: \epsscale{1}
151: \plotone{f6.eps}
152: \caption{The radius--luminosity relationship based on
153: the \civ\,$\lambda1549$ emission line and the UV continuum,
154: for the galaxies listed in Table 6.
155: The UV continuum luminosity is in units of erg\,s$^{-1}$.
156: The best-fit line, with slope $\alpha = 0.61\pm 0.05$,
157: is shown as a solid line. The dashed line is the best fit
158: for a fixed slope $\alpha = 0.56$, which is the
159: slope of the relationship between the size of the
160: \Hbeta-emitting region and the UV luminosity
161: (Kaspi et al.\ 2005).}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164: \setcounter{table}{5}
165: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
166: %
167: % Table 6 -- Measured C IV Lags
168: %
169: \tablewidth{0pt}
170: \tablecaption{Measured C\,{\sc iv} $\lambda1549$ Lags}
171: \tablehead{
172: \colhead{} &
173: \colhead{Lag} &
174: \colhead{} &
175: \colhead{$\log \lambda L_{\lambda}({\rm UV})$} &
176: \colhead{} \\
177: \colhead{Data Set} &
178: \colhead{(days)} &
179: \colhead{Reference\tablenotemark{a}} &
180: \colhead{(erg\ s$^{-1}$)} &
181: \colhead{Reference\tablenotemark{a}} \\
182: \colhead{(1)} &
183: \colhead{(2)} &
184: \colhead{(3)} &
185: \colhead{(4)} &
186: \colhead{(5)}
187: }
188: \startdata
189: NGC 4395 -- Visit 2 & $0.033^{+0.017}_{-0.013}$ & 1 & $39.57 \pm 0.06$
190: & 1 \\
191: NGC 4395 -- Visit 3 & $0.046^{+0.017}_{-0.013}$ & 1 & $40.10 \pm 0.03$
192: & 1 \\
193: NGC 3783 & $4.0^{+1.0}_{-1.5}$ & 2 & $43.59 \pm 0.09$
194: & 3 \\
195: NGC 5548 -- Year 1 & $9.8^{+1.9}_{-1.5}$ & 2 & $43.66 \pm 0.14$
196: & 4 \\
197: NGC 5548 -- Year 5 & $6.7^{+0.9}_{-1.0}$ & 2 & $43.58 \pm 0.06$
198: & 5 \\
199: NGC 7469 & $2.5^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ & 2 & $43.78 \pm 0.07$
200: & 6 \\
201: 3C 390.3 & $35.7^{+11.4}_{-14.6}$ & 2 & $44.07 \pm 0.21$
202: & 7
203: \enddata
204: \tablenotetext{a}{
205: 1: This work (ApJ, 632, 799 [2005]);
206: 2: Peterson et al.\ 2004 (ApJ, 613, 682);
207: 3: Reichert et al.\ 1994 (ApJ, 425, 582);
208: 4: Clavel et al.\ 1991 (ApJ, 366, 64);
209: 5: Korista et al.\ 1995 (ApJS, 97, 285);
210: 6: Wanders et al.\ 1997 (ApJS, 113, 69);
211: 7: O'Brien et al.\ 1998 (ApJ, 509, 163).}
212: \end{deluxetable}
213:
214: \end{document}
215: