1: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3:
4: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5:
6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
8:
9: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
10: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
11: %% use the longabstract style option.
12:
13: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
14: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
15: \newcommand{\myemail}{qujl@mail.ihep.ac.cn}
16:
17: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.} \shorttitle{ New
18: quasi-periodic oscillations} \shortauthors{Qu et al. }
19:
20: \begin{document}
21: \title{Discovery of new quasi-periodic oscillations in the X-ray
22: transient source V~0332+53}
23:
24: \author{JinLu, Qu\altaffilmark{1}; Shu, Zhang\altaffilmark{1};
25: LiMing, Song\altaffilmark{1}; M., Falanga\altaffilmark{2}}
26:
27: \affil{Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High
28: Energy Physics, CAS, Yuquan Road 19 (B), 100049 Beijing, P. R.
29: China} \email{qujl@mail.ihep.ac.cn; szhang@mail.ihep.ac.cn;
30: songlm@mail.ihep.ac.cn}
31:
32: \affil{CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique (CNRS FRE
33: 2591), F-91191, Gif sur Yvette, France} \email{mfalanga@cea.fr}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We report the discovery of a new quasi-period oscillation (QPO) at
37: 0.22 Hz, centered on the source spin frequency of the high mass
38: X-ray binary system V~0332+53 when the source was observed during its
39: November 2004/March 2005 outburst by {\em RXTE}. Besides this new QPO,
40: we also detected the known 0.05 Hz QPO. Both the 0.22 and 0.05 Hz
41: QPOs stand out clearly at a mid-flux level of the outburst within
42: January 15--19 2005, and later at an even lower flux level as the
43: width of 0.22 Hz QPO drops. No evolution of the centroid frequency
44: with the flux is seen in either QPO. The rms value below 10 keV is
45: around 4--6\% for both QPOs and decreases at higher
46: energies. We discuss our results in the context of current QPO models.
47:
48: \end{abstract}
49: \keywords{binaries: general --- stars: individual
50: (\objectname{V~0332+53)} --- X-rays: binaries --- X-rays:
51: individual (V~0332+53) --- X-rays: stars}
52:
53:
54: \section{INTRODUCTION}
55:
56: The high mass X-ray binary (HMXB) transient V~0332+53 (X~0331+53)
57: was discovered during a bright outburst phase in July 1973 with
58: the {\em Vela 5B} observatory \citep{terrell84}. After the
59: discovery, the source was extensively studied in
60: three new outbursts: in 1983 by \citet{tanaka83} with
61: {\em EXOSAT}, in 1989 by \citet{makishima90a} with {\em Ginga} and
62: the last one in 2004/2005 by \citet{zhang05} and \citet{Kreyk05} with {\em
63: RXTE} and {\em INTEGRAL}. No outburst was detected by BATSE on
64: board {\em CGRO} during its era between 1991 and 2000 nor by {\em
65: RXTE} until November 2004 when the source outburst was caught by the
66: all sky monitor (ASM).
67:
68: The recurrent HMXB transient system consists of an accreting
69: neutron star (NS) and an early-type O8--9 Ve optical
70: counterpart BQ Cam located at a distance of $\sim$ 7 kpc
71: \citep{bernacca84,honey85,negueruela99}. The pulse period was
72: first measured at 4.375 s with a 34 day orbit period, and a
73: moderately eccentric orbit $e \sim 0.3$ \citep{stella85}. The
74: morphology of the pulse profile changes as a function of energy.
75: It shows a prominent and broad single-peak at lower-energy and a
76: secondary peak which becomes more evident above 6 keV
77: \citep{unger92,Kreyk05}. However, \citet{stella85} and
78: \citet{zhang05} found that the pulse profile is also dependent on
79: the source luminosity -- evolving from a double pulse when the source is
80: bright to a single pulse when the source flux is lower. The period
81: was found to decrease during outburst, with a recently measured
82: value of $-\dot P\sim 9\times10^{-11}$ s s$^{-1}$ \citep{zhang05}. Possible
83: evidence of an accretion disk was found with the detection of a 0.05
84: Hz QPO \citep{takeshima94}.
85:
86: Observations \citep{makishima90b,coburn05,soldi05,Kreyk05}
87: show that the spectrum is best fitted by an absorbed power-law
88: with an exponential cut-off and the additional components of
89: cyclotron absorption lines, located at 25 keV, 50 keV, and 70 keV.
90: The magnetic field at the NS surface is estimated to be around
91: 2.7$\times 10^{12}$ Gauss.
92:
93: In this letter we report the discovery of a new QPO based on the
94: {\em RXTE} observations of V~0332+53 during the 2004/2005
95: outburst.
96:
97: \section{OBSERVATIONS and DATA}
98:
99: After the initial follow-up observation by {\em RXTE} starting
100: November 27, 2004, Target of Opportunity (ToO) observations were
101: performed between December 28, 2004 and February 15, 2005, the data from
102: which were made public. The {\it RXTE} observations caught
103: the source V~0332+53 at the outburst maximum on December 28--30,
104: 2004 and during the outburst decay phase on January 4--6, 15--19,
105: and February 12--15, 2005. In Fig.\ref{asmlc} we show the four
106: time intervals in which the {\em RXTE} observation was performed.
107: Hereafter we call the four datasets {\it I}, {\it II}, {\it
108: III} and {\it IV}, respectively.
109: For our timing analysis, we used these datasets from the
110: Proportional Counter Array (PCA; 2--60 keV) \citep{jahoda96}. The
111: PCA data were collected in the binned and event mode, where the
112: default selection criteria were applied. We used only the PCU2
113: which was on during the whole observation; the net PCU2
114: exposure time was 155 ks. The data reduction was performed using
115: the standard software package FTOOLS version 5.3.1, and the
116: background contribution was subtracted using the {\it pcabackest} version 4.0.
117:
118: \begin{figure}[htb]
119: \centering
120: \includegraphics[width=6 cm, angle= 0]{f1.eps}
121: \caption{ Top panel: one day
122: averaged {\em RXTE}/ASM light curve in
123: the 1.5--12 keV energy band of V~0332+53 during the 2004/2005
124: outburst. The vertical arrows indicate the times of the {\em
125: RXTE}/PCA observations.
126: Middle panel: hard color (12.0--5.0) keV to (3.0--5.0) keV. Bottom
127: panel: soft color (3.0--5.0) keV to (1.5--3.0) keV. }\label{asmlc}
128: \end{figure}
129:
130:
131: \begin{figure}[htb]
132: \centering
133: \includegraphics[width=6 cm, angle= 0]{f2.ps}
134: \caption{The PCA light curve
135: (2.0-16.5 keV) (top panel) and the time evolutions of soft color
136: (middle panel) and hard color (bottom panel). Here MJD~53367
137: corresponds to December 28, 2004.}\label{pcalc}
138: \end{figure}
139:
140:
141: \section{RESULTS}
142:
143: \subsection{ASM AND PCA LIGHT CURVE}
144:
145: In Fig.\ref{asmlc} we show the one day averaged ASM light curve of the
146: entire outburst in the 1.5--12 keV energy band. We converted
147: the ASM count rate to flux using 1 Crab $\approx$ 75.5 cts/s
148: \citep{rem04}. The true flux is certain to be substantially higher
149: since the source is extremely hard, even for X-ray pulsars. The
150: outburst started on November 23, 2004 (MJD 53332) and reached the
151: maximum flux level of 1.2 Crab on December 29, 2004 (MJD
152: 53368.6$\pm$0.4). The flux then decayed with an exponential
153: time-scale, $F \propto e^{-t/15.9^{d}}$, to quiescence.
154: The first evidence of a new X-ray outburst of this source could be
155: traced back to January 2004 through observed optical
156: brightening \citep{gor05}. To analyze the V~0332+53 spectral
157: variability as function of the outburst time, we defined two
158: colors. The soft color is the ratio of the 3.0--5.0 keV band to
159: the 1.5--3.0 keV band and hard color is the ratio of the 5.0--12.0
160: keV band to the 3.0--5.0 keV band. Colors are built from the one
161: day averaged ASM light curve. From the color ratios it is evident
162: that the source underwent a spectral change during the outburst. We
163: find that the hardness in the soft color increases to a maximum
164: at the outburst peak, and that the transition in hardness occurs
165: at an earlier time for the hard color.
166:
167: In Fig.\ref{pcalc} we show the 0.5 day averaged PCA intensity
168: evolution of the source in the 2.0--16.5 keV energy band. Using
169: the 16 s time-resolution Standard 2 mode PCA data we calculated
170: the color ratios. The PCA soft color (3.2--5.7 keV/0.7--3.2 keV)
171: shows a linear trend consistent with the ASM one in the same time
172: interval. The PCA hard color (9.4--16.5 keV/5.7--9.4 keV) shows a
173: spectral hardening during the outburst flux decay, compared
174: to the little change of the spectral shape in the soft color.
175:
176: \subsection{TIMING ANALYSIS}
177:
178: We searched for QPOs in the 2--60 keV energy band, using
179: binned mode and event mode PCA data. We computed separately
180: for each of the four datasets a Power Density Spectrum (PDS) in
181: the frequency range between 1/256 and 8 Hz from Fast Fourier
182: Transforms. The PDS is normalized using the method described by
183: \citet{miyamoto91}, and the Poisson white noise is subtracted.
184: In the resulting PDS two evident QPO signals are present at
185: $\sim$0.05 and $\sim$0.22 Hz. The QPO feature
186: at $0.22$ Hz is newly detected; the low frequency QPO at $0.05$ Hz was
187: previously observed with {\em Ginga} \citep{takeshima94}. Both
188: QPOs are detected in the dataset {\it III} at very high
189: significance and in the dataset {\it IV} at lower statistical
190: significance. Outside these two time periods the QPOs are not obvious.
191: The PDS spectrum also shows high significant peaks at
192: the spin frequency, corresponding to a fundamental frequency of 0.228 Hz,
193: and its higher harmonics. The new QPO is very close to the spin
194: frequency of the NS. This provides the first detection
195: of a clear QPO riding on the spin frequency of a neutron star for a HMXB.
196:
197: \begin{figure}[htb]
198: \centering
199: \includegraphics[width=6 cm, angle= 0]{f3.ps}
200: \caption{The power density spectra of V~0332+53 obtained during
201: the dataset {\it III} and {\it IV}. The spikes were removed when
202: the PDS was fitted (see text).}\label{pds}
203: \end{figure}
204:
205: The accurate centroid frequency $\nu_0$ and the quality
206: factor $Q\equiv \nu_0/\delta\nu$ of the QPOs were found
207: by fitting the PDS with two Lorentzian functions.
208: The broad band-limited noise component
209: was fitted using a power-law and a Lorentzian function. The best
210: fit was also found by removing the spikes of the spin
211: frequency and its harmonics (3--5 frequency bins for each spike) from the PDS.
212: For dataset {\it III} (January 15--16, 2005), we found the
213: centroid frequency for the new QPO at $\nu_0 = 0.223\pm0.002$ Hz
214: and the quality factor $Q \approx 2.1$. The lower frequency
215: QPO was at $\nu_0 = 0.049\pm0.007$ Hz with a quality factor of $Q
216: \approx 1.3$. One month later, using the whole dataset {\it IV} we
217: found for the higher frequency QPO $\nu_0 = 0.227\pm0.002$ Hz
218: and $Q \approx 12$.
219:
220: \begin{figure}[htb]
221: \centering
222: \includegraphics[width=6 cm, angle= 0]{f4.eps}
223: \caption{Flux evolutions of the
224: centroid frequencies and widths for the 0.22 Hz QPO (first two
225: panels) and for the 0.05 Hz QPO (lower two panels).}
226: \label{qpofre}
227: \end{figure}
228:
229: The Fourier transform of the time series resulted in the PDS
230: with best fits shown in Fig.\ref{pds}. In Fig.\ref{qpofre} we
231: show the evolution of the QPO centroid frequencies and widths
232: versus the X-ray flux for the datasets {\it III} and {\it IV}.
233: We found that the centroid frequencies of both QPOs do not change
234: significantly with the flux, while the width of the 0.22 Hz QPO
235: drops with lower flux level.
236:
237: To investigate the QPO energy dependence, we estimated the
238: fractional root-mean-square (rms) from the PDS. We consider only
239: the dataset {\it III} for this analysis, since the two QPOs
240: stand out significantly in this outburst phase. We find for
241: both QPOs that the rms is roughly constant below 10 keV and
242: decreases by a factor of $\sim$2 at higher energies
243: (Fig.\ref{rmsqpo}). The fact that this trend was not found in the 1989
244: outburst using {\it Ginga} data may be due to the relatively small
245: effective area of the detector \citep{takeshima94}.
246:
247: \begin{figure}[htb]
248: \centering
249: \includegraphics[width=6 cm, angle= 0]{f5.ps}
250: \caption{The energy evolutions of
251: the rms for the 0.22 Hz QPO (upper panel) and for the 0.05 Hz QPO
252: (lower panel).}\label{rmsqpo}
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: \section{DISCUSSION}
256:
257: We have discovered a new QPO in V~0332+53 at $\nu_0
258: = 0.223\pm0.002$ Hz, close to the spin frequency of the neutron star.
259: This new QPO was visible in the PDS at the same time as the well known
260: $\nu_0 = 0.049\pm0.007$ Hz QPO. The
261: fact that the QPO is found near the spin frequency suggests that it is
262: produced on or near the surface of the NS. QPOs found in HMXB pulsars have
263: a frequency range of about 10 mHz to 400 mHz \citep[for review
264: ]{finger98,ghosh98} , though none have so far been detected at the NS
265: spin frequency. Broadening features in the PDS at the
266: spin frequency were detected as well in some other HMXB such as Vela
267: X-1, although they were not classified as QPOs \citep{lazzati97}.
268: The QPOs found in HMXBs are considerably lower compared with those found
269: in low mass X-ray binary (LMXB) systems which lie in a frequency
270: range from $\sim6$ to 50 Hz for the low frequency QPO and $\sim300-1200$
271: Hz for the higher frequency QPO \citep[for review]{klis04}.
272: In LMXB, one of the QPOs is interpreted as the NS spin frequency;
273: this may imply a similar origin for the newly observed QPO
274: in the HMXB V~0332+53.
275:
276: The precise nature of the QPO is still unknown. However, a
277: series of models have been proposed to explain the QPO features
278: observed in compact X-ray binary systems \citep[for
279: review]{klis04,finger98, ghosh98}. Among the most frequently used are
280: the magnetospheric beat frequency model (MBFM) and the Keplerian
281: frequency model (KFM). In the MBFM, the QPO frequency is
282: interpreted as the beat frequency between the stellar rotation,
283: $\nu_s$, and the Keplerian rotation, $\nu_K$, at the inner edge of
284: the accretion disk, i.e., $\nu_{QPO}=\nu_K-\nu_s$ \citep{alpar85,
285: shibazaki87}. The X-ray flux is proportional to the mass
286: accretion rate, i.e., $F\propto \dot{M}$. In the KFM
287: \citep{klis87}, the QPOs arise from the modulation of the X-rays by
288: inhomogeneities in the inner disk at the Keplerian frequency,
289: i.e., $\nu_{QPO}=\nu_K$, and the X-ray flux is $F\propto\nu_K^{7/3}$.
290:
291: Both models predict a systematic change of the QPO frequency with
292: the mass-accretion rate or with the flux. However, as shown in
293: Fig.\ref{qpofre}, such a feature is not observed in V~0332+53.
294: From dataset {\it III} to {\it IV} the X-ray flux changed by a
295: factor of $\sim4.5$, but the centroid frequencies of both QPOs remain constant
296: within the error bars. This suggests that neither the MBFM nor the
297: KFM can explain the QPO phenomena as observed in V~0332+53. Similar
298: conclusions have been drawn by different authors. For example, the
299: expected luminosity related to the QPO frequency does not always
300: agree with the observed luminosity
301: \citep{finger98}. Other observations have not been supported by the
302: MBFM model, e.g., as found by Takeshima et al. (1994) through the
303: comparison of the estimated Alfv\'en radius from accretion disk
304: theory (Ghosh \& Lamb 1979a,b).
305:
306: One alternative model to explaining such correlations was given by
307: \citet{lazzati97} and \citet{burderi07}. They argued that the
308: accretion flow is inhomogeneous near the surface of the neutron
309: star, and random shots are characterized by an arbitrary
310: degree of modulation. The combination of rotation and radiative
311: transfer effects should therefore produce a periodic modulation of
312: the shots similar to that of any continuum X-ray emission from
313: the polar caps. They proposed that a coupling between the periodic
314: and red-noise variability should be frequently present in X-ray
315: pulsars. The discovery of a new QPO with the frequency of the spinning
316: neutron star provides an additional example which could be
317: understood within the scenario of this model.
318:
319:
320: \acknowledgments J.L. Qu thanks F. J. Lu for helpful discussions.
321: This work was subsidized by the Special Funds for Major State
322: Basic Research Projects and by the National Natural Science
323: Foundation of China. This research has made use of data obtained
324: through the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research
325: Center Online Service, provided by the NASA/Goddard Space Flight
326: Center.
327:
328: \begin{thebibliography}{}
329:
330: \bibitem[Alpar \& Shaham(1985)]{alpar85}Alpar, M. A., \& Shaham, J. 1985, \nat, 316, 239
331:
332: \bibitem[Burderi et al.(1997)]{burderi07}Burderi, L., Robba, N. R.,
333: Barbera, N. L., \& Guainazzi, M. 1997, \apj, 481, 943
334:
335: \bibitem[Bernacca et al.(1984)]{bernacca84}Bernacca, P. L., Iijima,
336: T., \& Stagni, R. 1984, \aap, 132, L8
337:
338: \bibitem[Coburn et al.(2005)]{coburn05}Coburn, W., Kretschmar, P.,
339: Kreykenbohm, I., et al. 2005, Astron. Telegram, 381
340:
341: \bibitem[Finger(1998)]{finger98}Finger, M. H. 1998, Adv. Space Res., 22, 1007
342:
343: \bibitem[Ghosh \& Lamb(1979a)]{ghosh79a}Ghosh, P., \& Lamb,
344: F. K. 1979a, \apj, 232, 259
345:
346: \bibitem[Ghosh \& Lamb(1979b)]{ghosh79b}Ghosh, P.,\& Lamb,
347: F. K. 1979b, \apj, 234, 296
348:
349: \bibitem[Ghosh(1998)]{ghosh98}Ghosh, P. 1998, Adv. Space Res., 22, 1017
350:
351: \bibitem[Goranskij \& Barsukova(2005)]{gor05}Goranskij, V., \&
352: Barsukova, E. 2005, Astron. Telegram, 245
353:
354: \bibitem[Jahoda et al.(1996)]{jahoda96}Jahoda, K., Swank, J.H., Giles,
355: A.B., et al., 1996, Proc. SPIE, 2808, 59
356:
357: \bibitem[Honeycutt \& Schlegel(1985)]{honey85}Honeycutt, R. K. \&
358: Schlegel, E.M. 1985, \pasp, 97, 300
359:
360: \bibitem[Kreykenbohm et al.(2005)]{Kreyk05}Kreykenbohm, I, et al. \aap,
361: 433, L45
362:
363: \bibitem[Lazzati \& Stella(1997)]{lazzati97}Lazzati, D., \& Stella,
364: L. 1997, \apj, 476, 267
365:
366: \bibitem[Makishima et al.(1990a)]{makishima90a}Makishima K., Ohashi,
367: T., Kawai, N., et al. 1990a, \pasj, 42, 29
368:
369: \bibitem[Makishima et al.(1990b)]{makishima90b}Makishima K., Mihara,
370: T., Ishida M., et al. 1990b, \apjl, 365, L59
371:
372: \bibitem[Miyamoto et al.(1991)]{miyamoto91}Miyamoto, S., Kimura, K.,
373: Kitamoto, S., et al. 1991, \apj, 383, 784
374:
375: \bibitem[Negueruela et al.(1999)]{negueruela99} Negueruela, I,. Roche,
376: P., Fabregat, J., \& Coe, M. J. 1999, MNRAS, 307, 7695
377:
378: \bibitem[Remillard(2004)]{rem04}Remillard, R. 2004, Astron. Telegram, 371
379:
380: \bibitem[Shibazaki \& Lamb(1987)]{shibazaki87}Shabazaki, N., \& Lamb,
381: F. K. 1987, \apj, 318, 767
382:
383: \bibitem[Soldi et al.(2005)]{soldi05}Soldi, S, Produit, N., Belanger,
384: G., et al. 2005, Astron. Telegram, 382
385:
386: \bibitem[Stella et al.(1985)]{stella85}Stella, L., White, N. E.,
387: Davelaar, J., et al. 1985, \apjl, 288, L45
388:
389: \bibitem[Terrell \& Priedhorsky(1984)]{terrell84}Terrell, J.,
390: Predhorsky, W. C. 1984, \apjl, 285, L15
391:
392: \bibitem[Takeshima et al.(1994)]{takeshima94}Takeshima T., Dotani T.,
393: Mitsuda K., Nagase F. 1994, \apj, 436, 871
394:
395: \bibitem[Tanaka et al.(1983)]{tanaka83} Tanaka, Y., \& {\it Tenma
396: Team.} 1983, {\it IAU Circ.}, 3891
397:
398: \bibitem[Unger et al.(1992)]{unger92}Unger, S. W.; Lewis, J. R.;
399: Pedlar, A.; Axon, D. J. 1992, \mnras, 256, 725
400:
401: \bibitem[e.g., van der Klis (2004)]{klis04}van der Klis, M. 2004, in
402: ``Compact stellar X-ray sources'', Lewin \& van der Klis (eds.),
403: Cambridge University Press [astro-ph/0410551]
404:
405: \bibitem[van der Klis et al.(1987)]{klis87}van der Klis, M.,
406: Jansen F., van Paradijs, J. P. 1987, \apjl, L19
407:
408: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2005)]{zhang05} Zhang, S., Qu, J.L., Song, L.M.,
409: Torres, D. F. 2005, submitted to \apjl
410:
411: %\bibitem[]{301}
412:
413: \end{thebibliography}
414:
415:
416: \clearpage
417:
418:
419: \clearpage
420:
421: %\clearpage
422:
423:
424: \end{document}
425: