1: \documentclass{icrc29}
2: \usepackage{graphicx,amssymb,amsmath,times}
3: \setcounter{page}{1}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title[Search for VHE Emission from GRBs with Milagro]{Search for Very High Energy Emission from Satellite-triggered GRBs with the Milagro Observatory}
7:
8: \author[P.~M.~Saz Parkinson]{P.~M.~Saz Parkinson$^a$ for the Milagro Collaboration \\
9: (a) Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 }
10:
11: \presenter{Presenter: P.~M.~ Saz Parkinson (pablo@scipp.ucsc.edu), \
12: usa-saz-parkinson-P-abs1-og24-oral}
13:
14: \maketitle
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17: The Milagro gamma-ray observatory employs a water Cherenkov detector to
18: observe extensive air showers produced by high energy particles interacting
19: in the Earth's atmosphere. Milagro has a wide field of view (2 sr) and high duty
20: cycle ($>$ 90\%) making it an ideal all-sky monitor of the northern hemisphere in the
21: 100 GeV to 100 TeV energy range. More than 45 satellite-triggered gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
22: have occurred in the field of view of Milagro since January 2000, with the rate of bursts
23: increasing significantly with the launch of \emph{Swift}. We discuss
24: the most recent results of a search for very high energy (VHE) emission from these GRBs.
25: \end{abstract}
26:
27: \section{Introduction}
28:
29: The search for prompt VHE emission ($>$100 GeV) from GRBs is motivated by experimental
30: observations and theoretical predictions, and its detection could
31: allow us to constrain GRB emission models. Although VHE emission from GRBs has not been conclusively
32: demonstrated, there are several hints of emission at these high energies.
33: Milagrito, a prototype of Milagro, searched for emission coincident with 54 BATSE bursts
34: and reported evidence for emission above 650 GeV from GRB 970417a, with a (post-trials) probability of
35: 1.5$\times10^{-3}$ of being a background fluctuation~\cite{atkins00a,atkins03}.
36: The HEGRA group reported evidence at the 3 sigma level for emission above 20 TeV from GRB 920925c~\cite{padilla98}.
37: Follow-up observations above 250 GeV by the Whipple atmospheric Cherenkov telescope~\cite{connaughton97} failed to
38: find any high energy afterglow for 9 bursts studied, though the delay in slewing to observe these
39: bursts ranged from 2 minutes to almost an hour.
40: EGRET detected emission above 100 MeV from several bursts, including an 18 GeV photon from
41: GRB 940217, over 90 minutes after the start of the burst~\cite{hurley94}, indicating both that the spectra of
42: some GRBs extend to at least GeV energies and that this emission may be delayed~\cite{dingus95,dingus01}.
43: More recently, a second spectral component was discovered in GRB 941017~\cite{gonzalez03} which extended up to at
44: least 200 MeV and decayed more slowly than the lower energy component.
45:
46: While VHE emission from GRBs has been elusive, many GRB production models predict a fluence at TeV energies
47: comparable to that at MeV energies~\cite{dermer00,pilla98,zhang01}. This is because MeV
48: emission from GRBs is likely synchrotron radiation produced by energetic electrons within the strong
49: magnetic field of a jet with bulk Lorentz factors exceeding 100. In such an environment,
50: the inverse Compton mechanism for transferring energy from electrons to gamma rays is
51: likely to produce a second higher energy component of GRB emission with fluence possibly
52: peaked at 1 TeV or above. The relative strengths of the synchrotron and inverse Compton
53: emission depend on the environments of the particle acceleration and the gamma ray
54: production.
55:
56: Milagro\cite{atkins00b,atkins01} is a TeV gamma-ray detector, located at an altitude of 2630 m in
57: northern New Mexico, which uses the water Cherenkov technique to detect extensive air-showers
58: produced by VHE gamma rays as they interact
59: with the Earth's atmosphere. Its field of view is $\sim$2 sr and duty cycle $>$90\%. The effective area
60: is a function of zenith angle and ranges from $\sim50$ m$^2$ at 100 GeV to $\sim10^5$ m$^2$ at 10 TeV. A
61: sparse array of 175 4000-l water tanks, each with a PMT, was added in 2002. These ``outriggers,'' extend the
62: physical area of Milagro to 40000 m$^2$, substantially increasing its sensitivity. The angular resolution is
63: approximately $0.75^\circ$. The combination of large field of view and high duty cycle make Milagro the best
64: instrument available for conducting a search for VHE emission from GRBs.
65:
66: Twenty-five satellite-triggered GRBs occurred within the field of view of Milagro between
67: January 2000 and December 2001. No significant emission was detected from any of these bursts~\cite{atkins05}.
68: Between January 2002 and mid-December 2004 only 11 well-localized GRBs were within $45^\circ$ of zenith at
69: Milagro, due to the demise of BATSE. However, in the six months since the launch of
70: \emph{Swift}~\cite{2004ApJ...611.1005G}, an additional
71: 11 bursts have fallen in Milagro's field of view~\footnote{For information about well-localized GRBs see J. Greiner's web
72: page http://www.mpe.mpg.de/$\sim$jcg/grbgen.html}, several of them with measured
73: redshift. Due to the absorption of high-energy gamma rays by the extragalactic background
74: light, detections at VHE energies are only expected for redshifts less than $\sim$0.5. The degree of gamma-ray
75: extinction from this effect is uncertain, because the amount of EBL is not well known. There are different models of the
76: extinction~\cite{stecker98,dejager02,primack99}, which are similar in their general features because of the constraints from
77: the available data. The most recent model now predicts a somewhat smaller absorption than was previously
78: expected~\cite{primack04}, with an optical depth predicted to be roughly unity for 500 GeV (10 TeV) gamma rays from a
79: redshift of 0.2 (0.05).
80:
81: In addition to searching for VHE emission from satellite-localized GRBs, an independent
82: real-time search for VHE bursts in the Milagro data has been conducted for many different durations~\cite{noyes}.
83:
84: \section{The GRB sample}
85:
86: Table~\ref{grb_table} shows a summary of the sample of satellite-triggered GRBs within the field of
87: view (up to zenith angles of $45^{\circ}$) of Milagro between January 2002 and June 2005.
88: The first column lists the GRB name, following the usual convention (UTC date YYMMDD). The second column gives the
89: instrument that first reported the burst. The third column gives the trigger time (UTC second of the day).
90: Column four gives the coordinates, right ascension (RA) and declination (Dec.), in degrees, of the burst.
91: The fifth column gives the duration of the burst. Although this duration is derived from observations made at much
92: lower energies than Milagro detects, EGRET showed that the T90 duration obtained in the keV regime is relevant at
93: higher energies too. Four GRBs observed by EGRET were among the five brightest
94: BATSE bursts, and the significance of the EGRET detections in the T90 interval ranged
95: from 6 to 12 sigma, leading to the speculation that all GRBs might have high energy emission
96: during their respective T90 time intervals, and EGRET simply did not have the sensitivity to detect most of them~\cite{dingus01}.
97: Column six of Table~\ref{grb_table} lists the zenith angle of the burst at Milagro, in degrees. We include only
98: bursts for which the zenith angle was less than $45^{\circ}$ since the effective area of Milagro at zenith angles greater
99: than $45^{\circ}$ becomes small in the energy range where we expect GRB emission to be detectable (e.g. $<$ 1 TeV).
100: Column 7 gives the redshift (if measured) of the burst.
101:
102: \begin{table}
103: \begin{center}
104: \begin{tabular}{llllllllc} \hline \hline
105:
106: GRB &
107: Instrument &
108: UTC &
109: RA,Dec. &
110: T90/Dur. &
111: $\theta$ &
112: z &
113: Li-Ma &
114: 99\% UL fluence \\
115: &
116: &
117: &
118: (deg.) &
119: (s) &
120: (deg.) &
121: &
122: $\sigma$ &
123: (erg cm$^2$) \\
124:
125: \hline \hline
126:
127: 020625b & HETE & 41149.3 & 310.9,+7.1 & 125 & 38.1 & ... & 1.4 & 5.7e-6 \\
128: 021104 & HETE & 25262.9 & 58.5,+38.0 & 19.7 & 13.3 & ... & 0.9 & 7.5e-7 \\
129: 021112 & HETE & 12495.9 & 39.3,+48.9 & 7.1 & 33.6 & ... & -0.1 & 9.4e-7 \\
130: 021113 & HETE & 23936.9 & 23.5,+40.5 & 20 & 17.7 & ... & 0.1 & 6.4e-7 \\
131: 021211 & HETE & 40714.0 & 122.3,+6.7 & 6 & 34.8 & 1.01 & 2.0 & 1.7e-06$^*$ \\
132: 030413 & IPN & 27277.0 & 198.6,+62.4 & 15 & 27.1 & ... & 0.8 & 1.0e-6 \\
133: 030823 & HETE & 31960.6 & 322.7,+22.0 & 56 & 33.4 & ... & 1.0 & 2.8e-6 \\
134: 031026 & HETE & 20143.3 & 49.7,+28.4 & 114.2 & 33.0 & ... & 0.7 & 3.8e-6 \\
135: 031220 & HETE & 12596.7 & 69.9,+7.4 & 23.7 & 43.4 & ... & 0.2 & 4.0e-6 \\
136: 040924 & HETE & 42731.4 & 31.6,+16.0 & 0.6 & 43.3 &0.859 & -0.6 & 1.5e-06$^*$ \\
137: 041211 & HETE & 41507.0 & 101.0,+20.3 & 30.2 & 42.8 & ... & 0.9 & 4.8e-6 \\
138: 041219 & INTEGRAL & 6400.0 & 6.1,+62.8 & 520 & 26.9 & ... & 1.7 & 5.8e-6 \\
139: 050124 & Swift & 41403.0 & 192.9,+13.0 & 4 & 23.0 & ... & -0.8 & 3.0e-7 \\
140: 050319 & Swift & 34278.4 & 154.2,+43.5 & 15 & 45.1 & 3.24 & 0.6 & 4.4e-06$^*$\\
141: 050402 & Swift & 22194.6 & 136.5,+16.6 & 8 & 40.4 & ... & 0.6 & 2.1e-6 \\
142: 050412 & Swift & 20642.9 & 181.1,-1.3 & 26 & 37.1 & ... & -0.6 & 1.7e-6 \\
143: 050502 & INTEGRAL & 8057.7 & 202.4,+42.7 & 20 & 42.7 & 3.793 & 0.6 & 3.8e-06$^*$ \\
144: 050504 & INTEGRAL & 28859.1 & 201.0,+40.7 & 80 & 27.6 & ... & -0.8 & 1.3e-6 \\
145: 050505 & Swift & 84141.1 & 141.8,+30.3 & 60 & 28.9 & 4.3 & 1.2 & 2.3e-06$^*$\\
146: 050509b & Swift & 14419.2 & 189.1,+29.0 & 0.03 & 10.0 & 0.225 & -0.9 & 9.2e-08$^*$ \\
147: 050522 & INTEGRAL & 21621.0 & 200.1,+24.8 & 15 & 22.8 & ... & -0.6 & 5.1e-7 \\
148: 050607 & Swift & 33082.7 & 300.2,+9.1 & 26.5 & 29.3 & ... & -0.9 & 8.9e-7 \\
149:
150: \hline
151: \end{tabular}
152: \end{center}
153: \caption{\label{grb_table} GRBs in the field of view of Milagro in 2002--2005.
154: The upper limits assume the burst was nearby (z=0). Those with a (*) next to them have a
155: measured redshift, making this assumption invalid (See text).}
156: \end{table}
157:
158: \section{Data Analysis and Results}
159:
160: A search for an excess of events above the expected background was
161: carried out for the 22 bursts listed in Table~\ref{grb_table}. The total number of events within a
162: circular bin of radius $1.6^{\circ}$ at the location of the burst was summed for the duration of
163: the burst and the number of background events was extimated by characterizing the angular
164: distribution of the background using two hours of data surrounding the burst~\cite{atkins03}. The
165: significance of the excess (or deficit) for each burst was evaluated using equation 17 of~\cite{lima}
166: and is shown in column 8 of Table~\ref{grb_table}.
167:
168: No significant excess was found from any burst in the sample. The 99\% confidence upper limit on
169: the number of signal events detected given the observed events and the predicted background is
170: computed for each of the bursts following the method described by~\cite{helene}, except for
171: those bursts where the number of events is small ($<$ 10), where we use the prescription by~\cite{feldman}.
172: Finally, we convert the upper limit on the counts into an upper limit on the fluence (in the 0.25 to 25 TeV range)
173: by using knowledge of the effective area of Milagro, and assuming a differential power-law
174: photon spectrum of the form $dN/dE=KE^{-2.4}$ photons/TeV/m$^2$. The power-law index of 2.4 was
175: chosen as a conservative value for the spectrum. The upper limits listed in column 9 of Table~\ref{grb_table} assume
176: the bursts occured nearby (z=0), ignoring the effects of the EBL absorption. This assumption is invalid for
177: the six bursts with measured redshifts. For those with redshifts $>1$, all TeV emission would be absorbed.
178: Only two bursts in our sample have redshifts less than 1. For GRB 040924, taking into account the absorption,
179: the upper limits on the fluence are 1.6$\times10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ and 3.1$\times10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$, using the
180: absorption models of Primack et al.~\cite{primack04} and Stecker et al.~\cite{stecker98} respectively. We describe
181: the most interesting GRB of our sample in the next section.
182:
183: \subsection{GRB 050509b}
184:
185: GRB 050509b~\cite{hurkett} is so far only the second \emph{short/hard} burst detected by
186: \emph{Swift}. It had a reported duration of 30 ms and a relatively low fluence of
187: 2.3$\times10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ in the 15--350 keV range~\cite{barthelmy}. This bursts
188: represents the first clear detection of an afterglow from a short burst~\cite{kennea}.
189: Although Milagro detected no emission from this burst~\cite{saz}, the very favorable zenith
190: angle ($10^\circ$) and relatively low redshift of 0.225~\cite{bloom}\footnote{Some observers still
191: question whether this is the true redshift of the burst~\cite{castro-tirado}.} provide the opportunity
192: to set interesting upper limits for TeV emission from this burst.
193: Assuming a differential photon spectral index of -2.4, the derived 99\% upper limit on
194: E$^2$dN/dE at 2.5 TeV is 5.4$\times10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$, assuming
195: no EBL absorption. Taking into account the attenuation of TeV photons expected at a redshift
196: of 0.225, the 99\% upper limits for E$^2$dN/dE are 5.5$\times 10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ at 150 GeV, using
197: the model of Stecker et al.~\cite{stecker98}, and $2.0 \times 10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ at 300 GeV, using
198: the model of Primack et al.~\cite{primack04}. The energies quoted represent the median energy of the
199: events that would be detected from a power-law spectrum with index -2.4 convolved with each absorption model.
200:
201: \section{Acknowledgements}
202:
203: Many people helped bring Milagro to fruition. In particular, we
204: acknowledge the efforts of Scott DeLay and Michael Schneider.
205: This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation (under grants
206: PHY-0075326, %Milagro Operations
207: -0096256, %UW-Madison
208: -0097315, %LANL via UMD
209: -0206656, %NYU current; previous is PHY-9901496
210: -0245143, %UCSC; previous is PHY-0070927
211: -0245234, %UCI; previous is PHY-0070933
212: -0302000, %UMD
213: and
214: ATM-0002744) %UNH
215: the US Department of Energy (Office of High-Energy Physics and
216: Office of Nuclear Physics), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the University of
217: California, and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics.
218:
219: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
220:
221: \bibitem{atkins00a} Atkins, R. et al. 2000, \emph{ApJL}, 533, L119
222: \bibitem{atkins03} Atkins, R. et al. 2003, \emph{ApJ}, 595, 803
223: \bibitem{padilla98} Padilla, L., et al. 1998, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics}, 337, 43
224: \bibitem{connaughton97} Connaughton, V., et al. 1997, \emph{ApJ}, 479, 859
225: \bibitem{hurley94} Hurley, K., et al. 1994, \emph{Nature}, 372, 652
226: \bibitem{dingus95} Dingus, B. L., 1995, Astrophys. \& Space Sci., 231, 187
227: \bibitem{dingus01} Dingus, B. L., 2001, AIP Conf.~Proc.~558, 383
228: \bibitem{gonzalez03} Gonzalez, M.~M.\ et al. 2003, \emph{Nature}, 424, 749
229: \bibitem{dermer00} Dermer, C.\ D., Chiang, J., \& Mitman, K.\ E.\ 2000, \emph{ApJ} 537, 785
230: \bibitem{pilla98} Pilla, R. P. \& Loeb, A. 1998, \emph{ApJL} 494, L167
231: \bibitem{zhang01} Zhang, B.\ \& M\'esz\'aros, P.\ 2001, \emph{ApJ} 559, 110
232: \bibitem{atkins00b} Atkins, R. et al. 2000, Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A449, 478
233: \bibitem{atkins01} Atkins, R. et al. 2001, astro-ph/0110513
234: \bibitem{atkins05} Atkins, R. et al. 2005, \emph{ApJ}, in press, astro-ph/0503270
235: \bibitem{2004ApJ...611.1005G} Gehrels, N., et al.\ 2004, \emph{ApJ}, 611, 1005
236: \bibitem{stecker98} Stecker, F. \& de Jager, O. C. 1998, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics} 334, L85
237: \bibitem{dejager02} de Jager, O.~C. \& Stecker, F.~W. 2002, \emph{ApJ}, 566,738
238: \bibitem{primack99} Primack, J. R., Bullock, J. S., Somerville, R. S. \& Macminn, D. 1999, \emph{Astroparticle Physics}, 11, 93
239: \bibitem{primack04} Primack, J. R., Bullock, J. S., \& Somerville, R. S. 2004 in \emph{$\gamma$ 2004 Heidelberg}, ed. Aharonian, F.~A. 2004
240: \bibitem{noyes} Noyes, D., 29th ICRC, Pune, 2005
241: \bibitem{lima} Li, T.~P., \& Ma, Y.~Q. 1983, \emph{ApJ}, 272, 317
242: \bibitem{helene} Helene, O. 1983, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods Phys. Res., 212, 319
243: \bibitem{feldman}Feldman, G.~J.~ \& Cousins, R.~D.~ 1998 , Phys. Rev. D57,3873
244: \bibitem{hurkett} Hurkett, C. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3381
245: \bibitem{barthelmy} Barthelmy, S. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3385
246: \bibitem{kennea} Kennea, J. A., et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3383
247: \bibitem{saz} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.~ 2005, GCN Circular No. 3411
248: \bibitem{bloom} Bloom, J. et al 2005, astro-ph/0505480
249: \bibitem{castro-tirado} Castro-Tirado, A.~J.~ et al, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics}, accepted, astro-ph/0506662
250:
251: \end{thebibliography}
252:
253: \end{document}
254: