1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\gsim{\ \raise 3pt \hbox{$>$} \kern -8.5pt \raise -2pt \hbox{$\sim$}\ }
4: \def\lsim{\ \raise 3pt \hbox{$<$} \kern -8.5pt \raise -2pt \hbox{$\sim$}\ }
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Spatial Evidence for Transition Radiation in a Solar Radio Burst}
8: \author{Gelu M. Nita\altaffilmark{1}, Dale E. Gary\altaffilmark{1}, and Gregory D. Fleishman\altaffilmark{1, 2}}
9: \affil{$^1$New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102,
10: $^2$National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville 22903, VA,
11: USA}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14: Microturbulence, i.e. enhanced fluctuations of plasma density,
15: electric and magnetic fields, is of great interest in
16: astrophysical plasmas, but occurs on spatial scales far too small
17: to resolve by remote sensing, e.g., at $\sim$1-100 cm in the solar
18: corona. This paper reports spatially resolved observations that
19: offer strong support for the presence in solar flares of a
20: suspected radio emission mechanism, resonant transition radiation,
21: which is tightly coupled to the level of microturbulence and
22: provides direct diagnostics of the existence and level of
23: fluctuations on decimeter spatial scales. Although the level of
24: the microturbulence derived from the radio data is not
25: particularly high, $\left<\Delta n^2 \right>/n^2 \sim 10^{-5}$, it
26: is large enough to affect the charged particle diffusion and give
27: rise to effective stochastic acceleration. This finding has
28: exceptionally broad astrophysical implications since modern
29: sophisticated numerical models predict generation of much stronger
30: turbulence in relativistic objects, e.g., in gamma-ray burst
31: sources.
32: \end{abstract}
33:
34: \keywords{radiation mechanisms: nonthermal -- Sun: flares -- Sun:
35: radio radiation}
36:
37: \section{Introduction}
38:
39: Microturbulence in cosmic sources governs the dynamics of energy
40: release and dissipation in astrophysical and geospace plasmas, the
41: formation of collisionless shock waves and current sheets, and is
42: a key ingredient in stochastic acceleration \citep{c1,c2} and
43: enhanced diffusion \citep{DT_1966,c3,c4} of nonthermal particles.
44: The microturbulence may also affect the electromagnetic emission
45: produced by fast particles, giving rise to Transition Radiation
46: (TR), which was proposed nearly 60 years ago by two Nobel Prize
47: winning physicists, \citet{c5}. TR in its original form \citep{c5}
48: results from a variation in phase speed of wave propagation at
49: transition boundaries. The theory of TR has seen wide application
50: in the laboratory \citep{c6} and in cosmic ray detectors
51: \citep{c7,c8}, although no naturally occurring radiation had been
52: confirmed as TR.
53:
54: In the astrophysical context, TR must arise whenever nonthermal
55: charged particles pass near or through small-scale inhomogeneities
56: such as wave turbulence or dust grains. However, it was thought
57: to be weak, and perhaps unobservable \citep{c9b, c9a, c9}, until
58: \citet{c10} showed that its intensity can be greatly enhanced due
59: to plasma resonance at frequencies just above the local plasma
60: frequency. Spatially and spectrally resolved observations of this
61: resonant transition radiation (RTR), if present, can provide
62: quantitative diagnostics of plasma density, and of the level of
63: microturbulence in the flaring region.
64:
65: A number of recent publications, based mainly on studies of
66: individual events, indicate that RTR may be produced in solar
67: radio bursts \citep{c10a,c10b,c10c,c10d,Bogod_Yasnov_2005}. Most
68: recently, we have described the observational characteristics
69: expected for RTR in the case of solar bursts \citep{c11}, and
70: found that the correlations and associations predicted for total
71: power data are indeed present in the decimetric ($\sim$1-3 GHz)
72: components of a statistical sample of two-component solar
73: continuum radio bursts. However, interpretations based on
74: non-imaging data remain indirect (and, thus, ambiguous) until
75: they can be combined with direct imaging evidence from
76: multi-wavelength spatially resolved observations, which were
77: missing in the previous studies.
78:
79: This report presents comprehensive (radio, optical, and soft
80: X-ray) spatially resolved observations for one of the
81: RTR-candidate bursts. As we describe below, these observations
82: provide primarily three new confirmations: (1) the RTR and
83: gyroemission sources are co-spatial, (2) the RTR component is
84: associated with a region of high density, and (3) the RTR emission
85: is $o$-mode polarized. Together with the already demanding
86: spectral and polarization correlations found previously
87: \citep{c11}, these new observations provide further strong
88: evidence in favor of RTR.
89:
90:
91: \section{Theoretical Expectations}
92:
93: The two spectral components of such RTR candidate bursts (one at
94: centimeter wavelengths due to the usual gyrosynchrotron (GS) mechanism,
95: and one at decimeter wavelengths suspected as RTR), must be
96: \emph{co-spatial} to allow an unambiguous RTR interpretation. An
97: alternative explanation of such two-component bursts is that both
98: spectral components are produced by the same (GS)
99: emission mechanism (with different parameter combinations in the
100: two components), but if the low and high frequencies come from the
101: same source location this should merely broaden the spectrum.
102: Having truly separate spectral components requires either
103: completely different source locations, or different mechanisms, or
104: both. Distinct spectral components having the \emph{same source
105: location} is a strong indicator that each component is produced by
106: \emph{a different emission mechanism}. Therefore, direct
107: observation of the spatial relationship between the spectral
108: components of RTR candidate bursts is the key evidence needed to
109: conclude the emission mechanism producing the decimetric spectral
110: component.
111:
112: The theory of RTR in the astrophysical context is discussed in
113: detail in a recent review paper \citep{c12}. RTR arises as fast
114: particles move through a plasma with small-scale variations (as
115: short as the wavelength of the emitted wave) of the refractive
116: index. Such variations may be provided by microturbulence-induced
117: inhomogeneities of the plasma density or magnetic field.
118:
119: In the case of solar bursts, the main properties of this emission
120: mechanism that can be checked against observations are: The
121: emission (1) originates in a dense plasma, $f_{pe} \gg f_{Be}$,
122: where $f_{pe}$ and $f_{Be}$ are the electron plasma- and
123: gyro-frequencies; (2) has a relatively low peak frequency in the
124: decimetric range, and so appears as a low-frequency component
125: relative to the associated GS spectrum; (3) is co-spatial with or
126: adjacent to the associated GS source; (4) varies with a time scale
127: comparable to the accompanying GS emission (assuming a constant or
128: slowly varying level of the necessary microturbulence); (5) is
129: typically strongly polarized in the ordinary mode ($o$-mode),
130: since the extraordinary mode ($x$-mode) is evanescent, as for any
131: radiation produced at the plasma frequency in a magnetized plasma;
132: (6) is produced typically by the lower-energy end of the same
133: nonthermal electron distribution that produces the GS emission,
134: with the \emph{emissivity proportional to the instantaneous total
135: number} of the low-energy electrons in the source \emph{at all
136: times during the burst} (in contrast to plasma emission, whose
137: highly nonlinear emissivity is largely decoupled from electron
138: number even though it may for a time display a similar
139: proportionality); (7) has a high-frequency spectral slope that
140: does not correlate with the spectral index of fast electrons (in
141: contrast to GS radiation, which does).
142:
143: \section{Data Analysis}
144:
145: Figure 1 presents the dynamic spectrum of the 2001 April 06 solar
146: radio burst in intensity and circular polarization, observed with
147: the Owens Valley Solar Array \citep{c13} (OVSA). This event is one
148: of many observed with OVSA whose spectral behavior matches the
149: expectations for RTR \citep{c11}, but is the first for which
150: detailed spatial comparison has been made. The RTR occurs at a
151: restricted range of time and frequency shown by the bright red
152: region in the bottom panel, which represents highly right hand
153: circularly polarized (RCP) emission. The results presented in
154: Figures 2 and 3 confirm the expected spatial association of the
155: RTR radio source with (i) the accompanying GS source, (ii) an
156: unusually dense soft X-ray loop, and (iii) the underlying magnetic
157: field structure, and hence offer further support for its
158: interpretation as RTR emission. Comparing the required
159: observational characteristics in the order 1--7 presented above,
160: we find:
161: \begin{enumerate}
162: \item Both the RTR (2 GHz) and GS (7.4 GHz) sources arise in or
163: near an unusually dense loop. The electron temperature inferred
164: from SXT data (Fig. 3), averaged over the pixels lying inside the
165: 85\% 2 GHz RCP contour, is $2\times10^7$ K, while the average
166: emission measure corresponding to one pixel ($2.5\times2.5$
167: arcsec) is $5.6\times10^{48}$ cm$^{-3}$. Assuming a line of sight
168: length of $\sim$25 arcsec, the projected loop width, we obtain an
169: estimate for the plasma density in the region as $3\times10^{11}$
170: cm$^{-3}$. This value directly confirms the existence of a high
171: plasma density in the flaring region, as suggested by the Razin
172: effect diagnosis we employed previously \citep{c11}. The RTR peak
173: frequency of 2 GHz implies, from the electron plasma frequency
174: $f_{pe}=9\times10^3\sqrt{n}$ Hz, an electron density of
175: $5\times10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$, compared with $3\times10^{11}$
176: cm$^{-3}$ derived above for the underlying soft X-ray loop. The
177: X-ray-derived density demonstrates the presence of high densities
178: in the region, while the lower radio-derived density is expected
179: since the 2 GHz radio emission will come primarily from overlying,
180: less-dense regions due to significant free-free absorption in the
181: higher-density regions.
182:
183: \item As seen in Fig. 1, the RTR forms a distinct, low-frequency
184: spectral component relative to the higher-frequency
185: GS component.
186:
187: \item Figs. 2 and 3 show that the RTR and GS sources are
188: co-spatial. As already emphasized, this co-spatiality is highly
189: conclusive in favor of RTR, since separate spectral components (of
190: multi-component bursts) typically come from distinct locations
191: \citep{c14,c15}.
192:
193: \item Both spectral components are smooth in time and frequency, with
194: comparable time scales, the main difference being that the GS
195: component is delayed with respect to the RTR component (see Figs. 1
196: and 4). Note also in Fig. 4 the similarity of high-energy HXR with
197: the GS (7.4 GHz) component, and low-energy HXR with the RTR (2 GHz)
198: component, which we discuss in more detail in item 6, below.
199:
200: \item Figs. 1 and 2 show that the RTR emission is strongly
201: polarized in the sense of the $o$-mode, as required, while the
202: GS emission is $x$-mode. The radio maps at 7.4 GHz in
203: Fig. 2 (filled contours) reveal RCP (red) overlying positive
204: (white) magnetic polarity and LCP (blue) overlying negative
205: (black) polarity, located on opposite sides of the neutral line.
206: This clearly shows a relatively high degree of $x$-mode
207: polarization of both 7.4 GHz radio sources. At 2 GHz (unfilled
208: contours), exactly the opposite spatial correspondence is seen,
209: with RCP (red) overlying negative magnetic polarity and (the much
210: weaker) LCP (blue) slightly shifted toward positive polarity. This
211: clearly shows a high degree of $o$-mode polarization for the RTR
212: spectral component.
213:
214: \item Indirect statistical evidence for the RTR component being
215: due to low energy electrons was obtained from spectral
216: correlations \citep{c11}. \footnote{Note that in most incoherent
217: emission mechanisms, the spatially resolved brightness temperature
218: provides a lower limit to the energy of emitting electrons. The
219: brightness temperature of the 2 GHz RCP source in Fig. 2 reaches
220: $2.5\times10^9$ K, which for the typical incoherent mechanism
221: would correspond to a particle energy of about 220 keV (indeed
222: lower than the energy of the synchrotron emitting fast electrons
223: specified below). However, for the RTR case this argument is
224: inconclusive since the brightness temperature of RTR depends on
225: effective energies of both fast electrons and nonthermal density
226: fluctuations, rather than of fast electrons only.} A more reliable
227: estimate of the energy of the fast electrons involved comes from a
228: comparison of the radio and hard X-ray light-curves in Figure 4.
229: We first note the similarity of the RTR light curve and the 41-47
230: keV hard X-ray light curve. As shown by \citet{c17}, hard X-rays
231: are due to electrons of energy 2-3 times higher than the photon
232: energy, so that 41-47 keV HXR correspond to $\sim 100-150$ keV
233: electrons. In contrast, the GS light curve at 7.4 GHz displays a
234: poor correlation with 41-47 keV HXR, but an excellent correlation
235: with the higher energy HXR light curve, at 128-157 keV, produced
236: by the electrons of $\sim 250-450$ keV. This is consistent with
237: the well known result that GS emission comes from electrons of
238: energy typically $> 300$ keV \citep{c16}. The similarity of the
239: shape and timing of the 128-157 keV HXR and 7.4 GHz light curves,
240: and those of the 41-47 keV HXR and 2 GHz light curves, is
241: consistent with their being due to electrons of energies $\gsim
242: 300$ keV and $\lsim 150$ keV, respectively. It is reasonable to
243: conclude that the RTR and GS emission, being essentially
244: co-spatial, are from different parts of a single electron energy
245: distribution.
246:
247: \item As reported in an earlier paper \citep[fig.7]{c11} the
248: high-frequency slopes of the RTR and GS spectra for this event are
249: uncorrelated, which provides an independent confirmation that the
250: low-frequency component is not simply a low-frequency GS source.
251:
252: \end{enumerate}
253:
254: \section{Discussion}
255:
256: The above characteristics rule out standard GS emission for the
257: low-frequency spectral component, while they are expected and
258: agree fully with RTR. An alternative model that might account for
259: the presence of a co-spatial, yet distinct dm-continuum spectral
260: component---quasi-stationary plasma emission due to a marginally
261: stable regime of a loss-cone instability---is much more difficult
262: to eliminate, or even distinguish from RTR. Indeed, properties 1,
263: 2, 6, 7 are typical also for plasma emission, and properties 3, 4,
264: 5, while not required for plasma emission, are not inconsistent
265: with it. We believe that the key evidence distinguishing RTR from
266: plasma emission is the strict proportionality between the radio
267: flux and the number of emitting electrons on all time scales, as
268: suggested by the agreement between the RTR time profile and the
269: low-energy hard X-ray light curve of Fig. 4. This proportionality,
270: based on the spectral properties of the dm bursts, was found in
271: all of the bursts studied by \cite{c11}. We note, however, that a
272: temporal resolution better than the 4 s we have available will be
273: needed to check this property down to millisecond time scales.
274:
275: Nevertheless, we looked for further evidence favoring the plasma
276: emission interpretation of the smooth dm component and conclude
277: that this model (even though not firmly eliminated) is not
278: supported by the data. For example, the high degree of $o$-mode
279: polarization of the dm continuum implies fundamental rather than
280: harmonic plasma emission, although the latter is typically much
281: easier to generate in the coronal plasma. However, spectra in this
282: burst and in the other bursts studied by \cite{c11}, at no time
283: show any hint of a second harmonic spectral feature. Furthermore,
284: quasi-steady plasma emission requires a significant loss-cone
285: anisotropy, which in turn gives rise to a widely observed loop-top
286: peak brightness for the optically thin GS radio emission
287: \citep{Meln_etal_2002}. In contrast, the 7.4 GHz source displays a
288: clear separation into $x$-polarized kernels (corresponding to leg
289: or foot-point sources, rather than a loop-top source), thus, any
290: pitch-angle anisotropy is at best very modest. This conclusion is
291: also supported by the statistical evidence found in \citep{c11} in
292: favor of more isotropic (than on average) distributions of the
293: fast electrons in the RTR-producing bursts. Therefore, all the
294: properties specific for RTR and those common for both RTR and
295: plasma emission are observed, while no specific property expected
296: solely for the plasma emission is seen, which leads us to favor
297: RTR.
298:
299: We have presented ample evidence that the decimetric component of
300: the 2001 April 06 radio burst near 19:23 UT is produced by the RTR
301: mechanism. Since this event is one among a set of other events
302: with similar, unique characteristics, the evidence presented here
303: supports the conclusions made by \citet{c11}, based on total power
304: data for a statistical sample of the bursts candidates, that these
305: bursts are due to RTR.
306:
307: The importance of this result is several-fold. First, it
308: strengthens the case for RTR as another incoherent continuum
309: emission mechanism in astrophysical plasmas, among only a small
310: number of others: gyrosynchrotron/synchrotron emission,
311: bremsstrahlung, and inverse Compton emission. Second, there are a
312: few types of solar radio continuum, e.g., type I and type IV m/dm,
313: which are conventionally ascribed to plasma emission. We point out
314: that this interpretation has never been quantitatively proved, and
315: RTR represents a plausible alternative to the current
316: interpretation, which we believe calls for revisiting the issue of
317: the origin of non-GS solar radio continua. Third, with new radio
318: facilities in development that are capable of simultaneous spatial
319: and spectral measurements of solar bursts (e.g. Expanded VLA
320: \citep{c18} and Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope (FASR)
321: \citep{c19}), RTR can be routinely recognized and used as a
322: diagnostic of the plasma density, the low-energy part of the
323: electron energy distribution, and of the presence and quantitative
324: level of microturbulence. In this event, for example, the level
325: of inhomogeneities derived from the RTR flux, described by Eq.
326: (403) in \citet{c12}, is $\left<\Delta n^2 \right>/n^2 \sim
327: 10^{-5}$. Thus, RTR may provide a sensitive tool for measuring
328: this elusive but important quantity.
329:
330: \acknowledgments We acknowledge NSF grant AST-0307670 and NASA
331: grant NAG5-11875 to NJIT. The NRAO is a facility of the NSF
332: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities,
333: Inc. We gratefully acknowledge the help of J. Qiu in providing the
334: X-ray and MDI data.
335:
336: \newpage
337: \begin{thebibliography}{}
338:
339: \bibitem[Acton et al.(1992)]{c24} Acton, L., Tsuneta, S., Ogawara, Y., Bentley, R., Bruner,
340: M., Canfield, R., Culhane, L., Doschek, G., Hiei, E. \& Hirayama,
341: T. 1992, Science, 258(5082), 618
342:
343: \bibitem[Bastian, Benz, \& Gary (1998)]{c16} Bastian, T.S., Benz, A.O. \& Gary, D.E. 1998, \araa, 36, 131
344:
345: \bibitem[Bastian(2004)]{c19} Bastian, T.S. 2004, in
346: \emph{Solar and Space Weather Radiophysics},(Eds -- D. E. Gary \&
347: C. U. Keller, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Kluwer),
348: 314, 47
349:
350: \bibitem[Benz, Saint-Hilaire, \& Vilmer(2002)]{c15}
351: Benz, A. O., Saint-Hilaire, P., Vilmer, N. 2002, \aap, 383, 678
352:
353: \bibitem[Bogod \& Yasnov(2005)]{Bogod_Yasnov_2005}
354: Bogod, V.M., \& Yasnov, L.V. 2005, Astron. Repts., 49, 144
355:
356: \bibitem[Cherry et al.(1974)]{c6} Cherry, M.L., Hartmann, G., Muller, D. \& Prince, T.A. 1974,
357: Phys. Rev. D, 10(11), 3594
358:
359: \bibitem[Dolginov \& Toptygin(1966)]{DT_1966}
360: Dolginov, A.Z., \& Toptygin, I.N. 1966, ZhETF, 51, 1771
361:
362: \bibitem[Domingo, Fleck, \& Poland(1995)]{c22} Domingo, V., Fleck, B. \& Poland, A. I. 1995, \solphys, 162, 1
363:
364: \bibitem[Durand(1973)]{c9b} Durand, L. 1973, \apj, 182, 417
365:
366: \bibitem[Favuzzi et al.(2001)]{c7} Favuzzi, C., Giglietto, N., Mazziotta, M.N. \& Spinelli, P. 2001,
367: Riv. Nuovo Cim. 24(5-6), 1
368:
369: \bibitem[Fermi(1949)]{c1} Fermi, E., Phys.
370: Rev. 1949, 75(8), 1169
371:
372: \bibitem[Fleishman(2001)]{c10a}
373: Fleishman, G.D. 2001, Astronomy Letters, 26, 254
374:
375: \bibitem[Fleishman \& Kahler(1992)]{c9} Fleishman G.D. \& Kahler S.W. 1992, \apj, 394,
376: 688
377:
378: \bibitem[Fleishman, Nita, \& Gary(2005)]{c11}
379: Fleishman, G.D., Nita, G.M. \& Gary, D.E. 2005, \apj, 620, 506
380:
381: \bibitem[Fleishman, Melnikov, \& Shibasaki(2002)]{c10b}
382: Fleishman, G.D., Melnikov, V.F., \& Shibasaki, K., P\emph{roc.
383: $10^{th}$ European Meeting on Solar Physics}, Prague, Czech Rep.,
384: 9-14 September 2002
385:
386: \bibitem[Gary \& Hurford(1990)]{c14} Gary, D. E. \& Hurford, G. J. 1990, \apj, 361, 290
387:
388: \bibitem[Gary \& Hurford(1999)]{c13} Gary, D.E. \& Hurford, G.J. 1999, in \emph{Proceedings of the Nobeyama
389: Symposyum, Kiyosoto, Japan}, NRO Rep. 479, 429
390:
391: \bibitem[Ginzburg and Frank(1946)]{c5} Ginzburg, V.L. \& Frank, I.M. 1946, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.
392: 16, 15
393:
394: \bibitem[Kennel \& Petscheck(1966)]{c3} Kennel, C. F. \& Petscheck, H. E. 1966, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1
395:
396: \bibitem[LaBelle et al.(2003)]{c10d}
397: LaBelle, J., Treumann, R. A., Yoon, P. H., \& Karlicky, M. 2003,
398: \apj, 593, 1195
399:
400: \bibitem[Lee(2004)]{c4} Lee, J.W. 2004, in \emph{Solar and
401: Space Weather Radiophysics}(Eds - D. E. Gary \& C. U. Keller,
402: Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Kluwer), 314, 179
403:
404: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2003)]{c10c}
405: Lee, J., Gallagher, P.T., Gary, D.E., Nita, G.M., Choe, G.S.,
406: Bong, S.C. \& Yun, H.S. 2003, \apj, 585, 524
407:
408: \bibitem[Melnikov et al. (2002)]{Meln_etal_2002}
409: Melnikov, V.F., Shibasaki, K., \& Reznikova, V.E. 2002, \apjl, 580,
410: L185
411:
412: \bibitem[Miller et al.(1997)]{c2} Miller, J. A., Cargill, P. J., Emslie, A., Holman, G. D., Dennis,
413: B. R., Larosa, T. N., Winglee, R. M., Benka, S. G. \& Tsuneta, S.
414: 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14631
415:
416: \bibitem[Nitta \& Kosugi(1986)]{c17} Nitta, N. \& Kosugi, T. 1986, \solphys, 105,
417: 73
418:
419: \bibitem[Platonov \& Fleishman(1994)]{c10} Platonov K.Yu. \& Fleishman G.D. 1994, Zh. Exper. Teor. Fiz., 106(4), 1053
420: (transl.: \emph{JETP}, 79(4), 572-580).
421:
422: \bibitem[Platonov \& Fleishman(2002)]{c12} Platonov K.Yu. \& Fleishman G.D. 2002, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk.,
423: 172(3), 241(transl.: \emph{Physics Uspekhi}, 45(3), 235-291).
424:
425: \bibitem[Perley et al.(2004)]{c18} Perley, Richard A., Napier, Peter J. \& Butler, Bryan J. 2004,
426: \emph{Proceedings of the SPIE}, 5489, 484
427:
428: \bibitem[Qiu \& Gary(2003)]{c23} Qiu, J. \& Gary, D. E. 2003, \apj, 599(1), 615
429:
430: \bibitem[Wakely et al.(2004)]{c8} Wakely, S. P. , Plewnia, S., Muller, V., Horandel, J. R. \&
431: Gahbauer, F. 2004, \emph{Nuclear Instruments and Methods in
432: Physics Research Section A}, 531(3), 435
433:
434: \bibitem[Yodh, Artru \& Ramaty(1973)]{c9a} Yodh, G. B., Artru, X., \& Ramaty, R. 1973, \apj, 181, 725
435:
436: \end{thebibliography}
437:
438:
439:
440: \clearpage
441:
442: \begin{figure}
443: \plotone{f1.eps}
444: \caption{2001 April 06 after 19:12 UT. Upper panel:
445: Total power dynamic spectrum recorded by OVSA with 4 s time
446: resolution at 40 frequencies in the [1.2--18] GHz range. Lower
447: panel: Dynamic spectrum of circular polarization with 8 s time
448: resolution at the same frequencies as in the upper panel. The
449: period of RTR is the highly polarized (red) emission in the lower
450: panel. Two spectral components are visible in the upper panel
451: during this time: the low frequency RTR component, which peaks at
452: 19:22:11 UT (3700 sfu at 2 GHz), and the delayed high frequency GS
453: component, which peaks at 19:22:51 UT (2300 sfu at 7.4 GHz).}
454: \end{figure}
455:
456: \clearpage
457:
458: \begin{figure}
459: \epsscale{0.75} \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{\small 2001 April 06,
460: OVSA radio maps (19:22:03 UT). The RCP (red contours) and LCP
461: (blue contours) at 2 GHz (unfilled contours) and 7.4 GHz (filled
462: contours) are overlaid on the SOHO \citep{c22} MDI magnetogram
463: (19:22:02 UT). The dashed ovals represent the half power OVSA beam
464: at the two selected frequencies. The radio contours are scaled
465: separately for each frequency and polarization, and only 3 are
466: shown for clarity, representing 55, 75, and 95\% of the maximum
467: intensity. The maximum brightness temperatures are 2500 MK (2 GHz
468: RCP), 770 MK (2 GHz LCP), 880 MK (7.4 GHz RCP) and 600 MK (7.4 GHz
469: LCP). Small islands of apparent magnetic field sign reversal in
470: regions of both polarities are an instrumental artifact
471: \citep{c23} and not real. Within the instrumental resolution (see
472: the corresponding beam size), the 2 GHz RCP source (red, unfilled
473: contour) is co-located with the 7.4 GHz LCP source (blue, filled
474: contour) in the negative magnetic field region. We conclude that
475: both low and high frequency emissions are likely produced by the
476: same population of electrons travelling along the same magnetic
477: loop. Remarkably, for both frequencies, the \emph{intrinsic}
478: degrees of polarization implied by the radio maps are noticeably
479: larger than those suggested by the unresolved polarization
480: spectrum presented in the lower panel of Fig. 1.}
481: \end{figure}
482:
483: \clearpage
484:
485: \begin{figure}
486: \plotone{f3.eps}
487: \caption{2001 April 06. Emission measure (EM) map
488: (19:22:00 UT) derived from the Yohkoh SXT instrument \citep{c24},
489: using data obtained with two different filters (Be119 and Al12). For
490: clarity, only the OVSA (19:22:03 UT) RCP 2 GHz (red contours) and
491: LCP 7.4 GHz (blue contours) are overlaid here. The EM map reveals
492: the existence of a magnetic loop or arcade of loops filled with hot
493: and dense plasma, which is consistent with the magnetic and radio
494: topology presented in Fig. 2. The 2 GHz RCP radio source and the 7.4
495: GHz LCP kernel are well aligned with the most dense section of the
496: loop.}
497: \end{figure}
498:
499: \clearpage
500:
501: \begin{figure}
502: \plotone{f4.eps}
503: \caption{OVSA total power lightcurves at 2 GHz (red
504: line) and 7.4 GHz (blue line), and Yohkoh \citep{c24} WBS hard
505: X-ray counts in the 41-47 keV (thick line) and 128-157 keV (thin
506: line) ranges. Each curve has been normalized to the corresponding
507: maximum values recorded after 19:21 UT (3700 sfu at 2 GHz, 2300 sfu
508: at 7.4 GHz, 2088, and 244 HXR counts, respectively). The 128-157 keV
509: hard X-ray and 7.4 GHz time profiles are similar, which is
510: consistent with the 7.4 GHz emission being due to electrons of
511: energy $>300$ keV. The RTR emission at 2 GHz peaks about 1 min
512: earlier, has quite different time behavior, and best correlates with
513: the 41-47 keV hard X-rays channel, reflecting the fact that it is
514: due to a lower-energy part of the same population, and also depends
515: on other parameters such as the level of density fluctuations.}
516: \end{figure}
517:
518: \end{document}
519: