1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{epsfig}%,aastexug}
3: \documentclass[apjl,twocolumn]{emulateapj_mod}
4: \usepackage{epsfig,apjfonts,mathptmx}
5:
6: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
7: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
8: \def\prosima{$\; \buildrel \propto \over \sim \;$}
9: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
10: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
11: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
12: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
13: \def\simpr{\lower.5ex\hbox{\prosima}}
14: \def\la{\lsim}
15: \def\h1{$h^{-1}$}
16: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
17: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
18:
19: \submitted{Submitted 13 May 2005; Accepted 20 July 2005}
20:
21: \shorttitle{Multi-$\lambda$ observations of $z=2$ galaxies in GOODS-N}
22: \shortauthors{E. Daddi et al.}
23:
24: \journalinfo{Astrophysical Journal Letters in press}
25: \begin{document}
26:
27:
28: \title{The population of B$\lowercase{\rm z}$K selected ULIRG$\lowercase{\rm s}$ at
29: $\lowercase{z}\sim2$}
30:
31:
32: \author{E. Daddi\altaffilmark{1,2},
33: M. Dickinson\altaffilmark{1},
34: R. Chary\altaffilmark{3},
35: A. Pope\altaffilmark{4},
36: G. Morrison\altaffilmark{1},
37: D.M. Alexander\altaffilmark{5},
38: F.E. Bauer\altaffilmark{5},
39: W.N. Brandt\altaffilmark{6},
40: M. Giavalisco\altaffilmark{7},
41: H. Ferguson\altaffilmark{7},
42: K.-S. Lee\altaffilmark{7},
43: B.D. Lehmer\altaffilmark{6},
44: C. Papovich\altaffilmark{8},
45: A. Renzini\altaffilmark{9}
46: }
47:
48: \altaffiltext{1}{National Optical Astronomy Observatory,
49: 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719}
50: \altaffiltext{2}{{\em Spitzer} Fellow; edaddi@noao.edu}
51: \altaffiltext{3}{{\em Spitzer} Science Center, Caltech, MS 220-6, CA 91125}
52: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada}
53: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK}
54: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802}
55: \altaffiltext{7}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
56: \altaffiltext{8}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
57: \altaffiltext{9}{ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, Garching 85748, Germany}
58:
59:
60:
61: \begin{abstract} We investigate the multi-wavelength emission of
62: $BzK$ selected star forming galaxies at $z\sim2$ in the Great Observatories
63: Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) North region.
64: Most (82\%) of the sources are individually detected at
65: 24$\mu$m in the Spitzer MIPS imaging, and one fourth (26\%) in the VLA radio
66: data.
67: Significant detections of the individually undetected objects are obtained
68: through stacking in the radio, submm and X-ray
69: domains. The typical
70: star forming galaxy with stellar mass $\sim10^{11}M_\odot$ at $z=2$ is an Ultra-luminous Infrared Galaxy (ULIRG),
71: with $L_{\rm IR}\sim1$--2$\times10^{12}L_\odot$ and star formation rate
72: $SFR\approx200$--300$M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$, implying a comoving
73: density of ULIRGs at $z=2$
74: at least 3 orders of magnitude above the local one. $SFR$s derived from the
75: reddening corrected UV luminosities agree well, on average, with the longer
76: wavelength estimates. The high 24$\mu$m detection rate suggests a relatively
77: large duty cycle for the $BzK$ star forming phase,
78: consistently with the available independent measurements of the space
79: density of passively evolving galaxies at $z>1.4$.
80: If the IMF at $z=2$ is similar to the local one, and in particular is not
81: a top-heavy IMF,
82: this suggests that a substantial fraction of the high mass tail
83: ($\simgt10^{11}M_\odot$) of the galaxy stellar mass function was completed by $z\approx1.4$.
84: \end{abstract}
85: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: formation --- cosmology: observations --- galaxies: starbursts --- galaxies: high-redshift}
86:
87: \section{Introduction}
88:
89: The rate at which stars in massive galaxies were
90: assembled is a crucial measurement for
91: the characterization of galaxy formation.
92: Hierarchical clustering models
93: have traditionally favored galaxy formation at
94: quiescent rates (e.g. Cole et al. 2001).
95: Formation of stars at high
96: rates in massive galaxies would qualitatively match monolithic formation
97: scenarios (Eggen et al. 1962).
98: Intense star formation at high redshift has been established for submm
99: selected galaxies. These are relatively extreme
100: objects,
101: with space densities nearly two orders of magnitude smaller than local
102: massive galaxies (e.g., Scott et al. 2002).
103: Extending the census to less extreme star formation rate ($SFR$)
104: levels is necessary, but
105: obtaining reliable $SFR$ estimates for high-redshift galaxies is a
106: challenging endeavor. The widespread presence of dust, absorbing
107: the light of high mass stars and re-radiating it at longer wavelengths,
108: complicates the immediate use of the UV luminosity as a $SFR$ indicator, as
109: uncertain large
110: corrections are required. A multi-wavelength approach, although
111: observationally demanding, can yield more robust measures of $SFR$.
112:
113: The major growth and assembly of galaxies' stellar mass is observed
114: during the epoch between redshifts $1<z<3$ (Dickinson et
115: al. 2003; Rudnick et al. 2003).
116: Daddi et al. (2004b), on the basis of the highly
117: complete spectroscopic database of the K20 survey (Mignoli et al. 2005),
118: showed that
119: a relatively clean, efficient and complete (reddening independent)
120: selection of massive
121: galaxies in the above redshift range can be obtained by selecting
122: outliers in a $(B-z)$ vs. $(z-K)$ diagram. For $z\sim2$ objects
123: with $K<20$, selected in this way, Daddi et al. (2004a;b; hereafter
124: D04a and D04b)
125: derived high masses and $SFR$s, suggesting they
126: are the progenitors of local massive spheroids caught during their
127: phase of major assembling. The $SFR$s derived
128: from the dust-corrected UV luminosities are however uncertain.
129:
130: In this letter, we have taken advantage of the $BzK$ selection to assemble a
131: statistical sample of $K<20$ (Vega) massive star forming galaxy candidates
132: at $1.4<z<2.5$ in the Great Observatories
133: Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) North field.
134: Deep 24$\mu$m observations,
135: obtained with MIPS on board of the Spitzer Space
136: Telescope (SST), were used to study their rest-frame mid-IR emission properties.
137: Deep X-ray, submm and radio data allow us to build a panchromatic view
138: of their spectral energy distributions (SEDs),
139: and to shed light on their nature and
140: star formation activity. We discuss the implications for the assembly process
141: of massive galaxies.
142: We use a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) from 0.1 to 100 $M_\odot$, and a WMAP cosmology with
143: $\Omega_\Lambda, \Omega_M = 0.73, 0.27$, and
144: $h = H_0$[km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$]$/100=0.71$.
145:
146: \section{B$\lowercase{z}$K selection of $z\sim2$
147: galaxies in GOODS-North}
148:
149: The GOODS-North field has been observed in the $K$-band
150: with the Flamingos camera at the Mayall 4-m NOAO telescope.
151: About 4--7 hours integration were collected with
152: average 1.2$''$ seeing, over each of two
153: contiguous pointings, reaching $5\sigma$ limits of $K\sim20.5$ (Vega)
154: for point sources. Calibration was done using objects in common with 2MASS.
155: Observations in the $B$- and $z$- bands were obtained at the Subaru telescope
156: with
157: Suprime-Cam with $<1''$ seeing, and are described in Capak et al. (2004).
158: Sources were selected over an area of 154 arcmin$^2$ to $K<20$ (Vega),
159: thus matching the limit
160: where the $BzK$ criterion is currently calibrated by the K20 survey (D04b).
161: The Capak et al. (2004) zeropoints were slightly adjusted,
162: and a small color term was applied to the $B$-band magnitudes
163: because the Subaru $B$-band filter is
164: redder than the one used in D04b.
165: 169 $z\sim2$ star forming galaxy candidates were selected having
166: $BzK\equiv (z-K)_{AB}-(B-z)_{AB} >-0.2$. We are explicitely
167: excluding from the analysis
168: the 13 objects with $BzK<-0.2$ and $(z-K)_{AB}>2.5$ that are
169: candidate passively evolving galaxies at $z>1.4$.
170: However, the shallower depth
171: of the $B$-band data (compared to those in D04b)
172: prevents a clean separation of $z>1.4$ passive and star forming
173: galaxies among sources with the reddest $z-K$ colors.
174: We might expect up to 10-15 genuine
175: passively evolving $z>1.4$ galaxies among the $BzK>-0.2$ objects,
176: counting the sources with no or low-significance B-band detection.
177: 38/169 (22\%) objects
178: were discarded as likely AGN-dominated, because
179: detected in the hard X-ray band (Alexander et al. 2003). The
180: AGN contamination that we recover here is
181: higher than in D04b, owing to
182: the deeper X-ray data.
183: The surface density of the 131 non X-ray bright
184: $BzK>-0.2$ objects in GOODS-N is $0.85\pm0.07$ arcmin$^{-2}$
185: (Poisson), consistent with that measured in the K20 survey. On the basis of
186: the K20 survey results (D04b),
187: we assume in the
188: following that the 131 galaxies with $BzK>-0.2$ are mostly at
189: $1.4<z<2.5$, with a relatively flat redshift distribution in that
190: interval and with a $\simlt10$\% contamination of objects at
191: $1<z<1.4$, and that our sample is complete for star forming galaxies
192: with $K<20$ at $1.4<z<2.5$. This is also
193: supported by our photometric redshifts, and by the
194: limited amount of spectroscopic redshift currently available for $K<20$, $BzK$
195: sources in GOODS-N.
196:
197: \section{Multi-$\lambda$ observations of B$\lowercase{z}$K selected galaxies}
198:
199: {\em Rest frame UV}:
200: The calibrations of D04b were used for estimating stellar masses,
201: reddening and $SFR$ of $BzK$ selected galaxies from their observed properties
202: in the optical/IR. The average
203: mass of our $z=2$ object is $1.0\times10^{11}M_\odot$ and the sample is
204: complete above $\sim10^{11}M_\odot$ for $1.4<z<2.5$.
205: The median $B-z=1.50$ color
206: translates to a reddening of $E(B-V)=0.40$ for the Calzetti et al. (2000)
207: law. This median reddening is similar
208: to our estimate of the $E(B-V)$ upper limit for the UV criteria
209: of Steidel et al. (2004) for selecting $z\sim2$
210: galaxies, and we estimate that roughly 50\% of the $z\sim2$ $BzK$
211: star forming
212: galaxies with $K<20$ would be missed when selecting in the UV. We find
213: an average $SFR\sim220\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ for our sample,
214: based on the estimate of the reddening corrected 1500\AA\ rest frame luminosity,
215: with a median (average) correction factor of 46 (118). The ratio of the averages of
216: the corrected and uncorrected $SFR$s is 42.
217:
218: {\em MIPS 24$\mu$m}:
219: Deep 24$\mu$m observations of GOODS-North were obtained with SST MIPS,
220: as a part of the GOODS
221: Legacy Program (M. Dickinson et al., in preparation),
222: for a total of 10.4 hours exposure time per sky pixel.
223: Sources were detected in the 24$\mu$m data using SST IRAC data as prior
224: positions, in order to improve source deblending (R. Chary et al.,
225: in preparation). We cross-correlated
226: the 131 $BzK$ selected galaxies to MIPS objects using a 2$''$ search
227: radius (expected false matching rate of order of a few \%). 107/131
228: (82\%) of the $z\sim2$ galaxies are matched to a
229: MIPS counterpart. The 24$\mu$m flux
230: ($f_{24}$) ranges from 300-500 $\mu$Jy for the brightest sources to the
231: typical $3\sigma$ limits in the range of 15--30$\mu$Jy (depending on
232: position) for undetected sources.
233: The median $f_{24}$ is 110$\mu$Jy,
234: including non detected sources. The average
235: is 127--124$\mu$Jy, depending on whether for the undetected sources
236: we use the $3\sigma$ upper limit or assign zero flux to them.
237: A Kendall's $\tau$ test
238: indicates that $f_{24}$ correlates with the $K$-band flux, with
239: a 99\% level of significance.
240: Comparing to the full GOODS-N MIPS 24$\mu$m catalog,
241: $BzK$ star forming galaxies account
242: for about 7--10\% of 24$\mu$m selected sources above 50 to 300
243: $\mu$Jy, with the fraction varying slightly with 24$\mu$m
244: limiting flux. These figures place lower limits to the
245: fraction of $z>1.4$ galaxies in 24$\mu$m selected galaxy samples,
246: which are consistent with the predictions of Chary \& Elbaz (2001;
247: hereafter CE01), i.e. 16\%.
248: At $1.4<z<2.5$ the 24$\mu$m observations probe rest-frame wavelengths
249: of 7--10$\mu$m, the mid-IR region dominated by strong PAH emission
250: features and silicate absorption.
251: In order to constrain the level of IR
252: luminosity ($L_{\rm IR}\equiv L_{8-1000\mu{\rm m}}$), hence $SFR$, required to
253: reproduce the observed $f_{24}$ levels,
254: we used the models from CE01, which
255: provide $L_{\rm IR}$-dependent templates calibrated from the local SEDs of
256: IR luminous galaxies. For a given $L_{\rm IR}$,
257: these models predict a factor of $\approx 5$
258: decrease of $f_{24}$ from $z=1.4$ to $z=2.5$.
259: Assuming a flat
260: redshift distribution within $1.4<z<2.5$ for the $BzK>-0.2$ selected galaxies,
261: models with
262: $L_{\rm IR}=1.7\times10^{12}L_\odot$ are required to reproduce the 125$\mu$Jy
263: average flux level\footnote[1]{
264: Note that we are studying the 24$\mu$m properties of a near-IR selected
265: sample of galaxies, not a 24$\mu$m selected sample. Its redshift
266: distribution is expected to be flat within $1.4<z<2.5$, independent of
267: the behavior of the 24$\mu$m flux with redshift. As we are detecting
268: 82\% of the objects, the typical flux that we detect corresponds to the
269: source at typical redshift.}. This corresponds to an average
270: $SFR\sim300\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ (Kennicutt et al. 1998).
271: Using instead the empirical SED of Arp~220,
272: calibrated by ISO observations of the PAH features region,
273: one would expect a relative $f_{24}$ peak around $z\sim2$ and minima
274: toward $z=1.4$ and $z=2.5$. This is due to strong 9.7$\mu$m
275: silicate absorption, a feature which has been observed to be quite
276: common at $z\sim2$ in sources with $L_{\rm IR}\simgt10^{13}L_\odot$
277: (e.g., Yan et al. 2005).
278: The $f_{24}$ expected from Arp~220 when averaged within
279: $1.4<z<2.5$ is about 30$\mu$Jy. For the Arp~220 IR
280: luminosity of $1.5\times10^{12}L_\odot$, this in turn implies
281: $L_{\rm IR}\sim6\times10^{12}L_\odot$ for the typical $BzK$ star forming
282: galaxy at
283: $z=2$, or very large $SFR\sim1000\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ (this high value is
284: disfavored by the other measurements, see below).
285:
286: {\em Radio 20cm}: 34/131 (26\%) of the $BzK>-0.2$ galaxies are individually
287: detected
288: with $S/N>3$ in deep VLA
289: radio data (Richards 2000; reprocessed by G. Morrison et al., in preparation),
290: with fluxes at 1.4~GHz in the range of 20--160~$\mu$Jy (when excluding a
291: radio galaxy with 1mJy flux), and an average of 37~$\mu$Jy.
292: Stacking of the
293: 94 undetected sources\footnote[2]{
294: To stack the radio data, sub images were
295: extracted at the locations of the non-detected sources.
296: These were corrected for
297: VLA primary beam attenuation and combined using a weighted
298: average. The integrated flux density and error were computed with
299: the AIPS task
300: JMFIT, which modeled the stacked emission using an elliptical Gaussian.},
301: after discarding 3 objects close to unrelated radio
302: sources, yields a $S/N=8$ detection for an estimated
303: average flux density of $10\pm2$~$\mu$Jy.
304: When adding to this the individual detections we derive an average flux
305: density of about 17$\mu$Jy for the full sample of 131 objects.
306: Using a radio spectral index $\alpha=-0.8$ ($f_{\nu}\propto\nu^{-\alpha}$) we derive a luminosity
307: of $3.6\times10^{23}$ W~Hz$^{-1}$ for an average $<z>=1.9$, which implies
308: $L_{\rm IR}\sim1.2\times10^{12}L_\odot$ and
309: $SFR\sim210\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ (Yun et al. 2001; Kennicutt et al. 1998).
310:
311: \begin{figure}[ht]
312: \centering
313: \includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{f1.eps}
314: \caption{The average multi-wavelength emission of 131 $BzK$
315: selected star forming
316: galaxies at $1.4<z<2.5$. The model shown here (from CE01)
317: has $L_{\rm IR}=1.7\times10^{12}L_\odot$ and is redshifted to $z=1.9$. Measurements
318: in SST IRAC ch2 (4.5$\mu$m, $AB=20.78$ mag) and ch4 (8.0$\mu$m, $AB=20.99$ mag)
319: were obtained from the data
320: of M. Dickinson et al., in preparation. The horizontal bar on the right shows
321: the 2-8~keV emission that would be expected from a typical AGN having the
322: mid-IR flux observed for our objects.
323: }
324: \label{fig:multi}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: {\em SCUBA 850$\mu$m}: Only one of the 131 sources appears in the
328: list of Pope et al. (2005) with a flux of 4mJy. In order to estimate
329: the average 850$\mu$m flux of the undetected objects we used the
330: Borys et al. (2003) HDF-N SCUBA supermap. Some 97 MIPS-detected
331: objects were stacked\footnote[3]{We are
332: using only MIPS-detected objects to maximize the signal to noise by avoiding
333: passive galaxy contaminants,
334: while the possible star forming galaxy contaminants at $1<z<1.4$ would not alter
335: significantly the stacking because of the mild dependence between 850$\mu$m
336: flux with redshift.}, after
337: excluding those separated by less than a
338: SCUBA beam halfwidth (7") from any known SCUBA
339: detection.
340: As the depth of the SCUBA data vary
341: considerably over GOODS-N, we used
342: weights in the stacking based on the local noise.
343: The average 850$\mu$m signal is $1.0\pm0.2$mJy. We checked
344: that this 5-sigma detection is robust using Monte-Carlo simulations.
345: Scaling down the result by 18\% to account for the MIPS undetected
346: objects, the average 850$\mu$m flux corresponds to
347: $L_{\rm IR}\sim1.0\times10^{12}L_\odot$, both for the CE01 templates and when using
348: Arp~220, or to $SFR\sim170\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$. At 450$\mu$m we obtain a 3$\sigma$
349: upper limit of 6mJy, consistent with the models.
350:
351: {\em Chandra soft and hard X-rays}:
352: Is the detected IR emission AGN or starburst powered~?
353: At $z\sim2$ the Chandra hard 2--8~keV
354: band is sensitive to highly penetrating rest-frame
355: X-rays up to about 20~keV, which can escape large column densities
356: up to about $10^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$.
357: The lack of hard
358: X-ray detection in the Chandra 2 Ms exposure should ensure that
359: bright AGNs are generally not included in our sample.
360: The typical upper limits to the 2--8~keV
361: flux of order $<3\times10^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ coupled to the
362: typical 24$\mu$m fluxes measured, imply lower limits to the 24$\mu$m
363: to 2--8~keV flux ratios, for single objects, about one full order of
364: magnitude larger than expected from AGNs (see e.g. Rigby et al
365: 2004). This suggests that the 24$\mu$m emission in our sample is
366: powered by star formation in most cases.
367: While we have discarded all direct hard
368: X-ray detections from our sample, 6/131 (4.5\%) of the objects are detected
369: in the soft-band only, with fluxes $\simlt10^{-16}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$
370: (Alexander et al. 2003).
371: Four of these are detected also in the radio, and one is the only SCUBA
372: detection. These soft sources are most likely
373: the most extreme starbursts in the $BzK>-0.2$ sample, similar to object ID\#5
374: described in D04a.
375: We stacked the X-ray undetected sources, considering only
376: the GOODS-N region within
377: 6 arcmin of the 2 Ms Chandra data aim point where the sensitivity is the
378: highest, and avoiding all objects closer than 3 Chandra PSF from known X-ray
379: sources. The stacked images result in a 8.5$\sigma$ detection
380: in the soft 0.5-2~keV band, for a flux of
381: $1.0\times10^{-17}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.
382: The non detection in the hard 2-8~keV band constrains the photon spectral index
383: $\Gamma>1.0$ at the 3-sigma level, and implies an average 24$\mu$m to 2-8~keV
384: flux ratio over two orders of magnitude above what is typical for AGN at $z\sim2$
385: (Rigby et al. 2004). If AGN are present they would have to be heavily Compton
386: thick.
387: Using $\Gamma=2.0$ as appropriate for
388: starbursts implies a rest-frame luminosity in the
389: 2--10~keV range of $3.4\times10^{41}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ for $<z>=1.9$.
390: Adding back the individual soft X-ray detections would increase the 2--10~keV
391: luminosity to about $5\times10^{41}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
392: This is a factor of two lower than estimated by D04b
393: for K20 $BzK$ sources.
394: Using the Ranalli et al. (2003) calibration this translates into an average
395: $SFR\sim100\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$, or $SFR\sim500\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$
396: if using the Persic
397: et al. (2004) calibration. The large difference is due to the relative
398: expected importance of high versus low mass X-ray binaries.
399: The latter calibration appears more appropriate
400: when dealing with IR luminous sources with $L_{\rm IR}\simgt10^{12}L_\odot$
401: (Persic et al. 2004).
402:
403: \section{Discussion}
404:
405: The multi-wavelength SED (Fig.~\ref{fig:multi}) of $BzK$ selected $z=2$
406: star forming galaxies consistently indicates an
407: average $L_{\rm IR}\sim1$--2$\times10^{12}L_\odot$ and
408: $SFR\sim200$--300$\ M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$,
409: supporting the earlier claims of D04a;b and
410: implying that the local correlations (e.g., the mid and far-IR to radio
411: correlations) hold, for the average $BzK$ galaxy,
412: also at $z\approx2$. While the X-ray based estimate appears
413: the least accurate, due mainly to the large uncertainties in its calibration,
414: the X-ray properties clearly support that the mid to far-IR emission of
415: these sources is indeed dominated by vigorous star formation and not by nuclear activity.
416: The inferred average $L_{\rm IR}\simgt10^{12}L_\odot$ implies
417: that the typical $BzK$ selected star forming galaxy is
418: an Ultra Luminous IR Galaxy (ULIRG).
419: Morphology from HST ACS indeed suggests that, in many cases, these
420: $z=2$ galaxies are assembling through merging (D04a),
421: similarly to local ULIRGs.
422: Using the volume at $1.4<z<2.5$ ($5.7\times10^5$~Mpc$^{3}$), we can put a lower limit to the spatial density of ULIRGs at $z\sim2$
423: of about 1--2$\times10^{-4}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. This is about 3 orders of
424: magnitude higher than at $z\sim0.1$ (Sanders et al. 2003), and a factor of 2--3
425: higher than at $z=1$ (Le Floc'h et al. 2005).
426: While ULIRGs are exceptional objects for the local
427: universe, they appear to be the norm among massive $z\approx2$ star forming
428: galaxies.
429:
430:
431: From the X-ray we also
432: derive a fairly low X-ray to optical flux ratio of
433: ${\rm log(f_{0.5-2~keV}/f_R)\sim-1.7}$, which suggests that also
434: the rest frame UV emission of these $z=2$ galaxies
435: is dominated by the emission of stars. The average $SFR$ inferred from
436: the dust-corrected UV luminosity agrees well with the
437: longer wavelength estimates.
438: Fig.~\ref{fig:B24pol} (top) shows the ratio of 24$\mu$m to $B$-band flux
439: densities as a function of the rest-frame UV galaxy colors.
440: Apart from K-correction effects, this observed
441: mid-IR to UV luminosity ratio measures the ratio of
442: dust-extinguished to relatively unobscured $SFR$. The Kendall's $\tau$
443: test detects a correlation at $>99.9$ confidence level. A similar trend
444: is found when using the radio flux instead of $f_{24}$.
445: This confirms that, in general, the red UV continua of
446: $BzK$ selected $z=2$ star forming galaxies are indeed due
447: to dust reddening. The diagonal
448: line plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:B24pol} (top)
449: shows the expected scaling in the case that the UV and mid-IR trace the same
450: amount of $SFR$.
451: The average ratio and its dependence
452: with the UV color are in line with what is expected.
453: \begin{figure}[ht]
454: \centering
455: \includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{f2.eps}
456: \caption{({\em Top panel}). The
457: ratio of 24$\mu$m to B-band flux for $K<20$ $BzK$ selected $z=2$
458: star forming galaxies in GOODS-North
459: as a function of $B-z$ color (i.e. dust extinction at 1500\AA, as inferred
460: using a Calzetti et al. 2000 law).
461: The diagonal line shows the expected ratio for the average $z=1.9$ in the case
462: that the UV and mid-IR trace the same amount of star formation. Solid and empty symbols are for sources with $f_{24}$ above or below the median, respectively.
463: ({\em Bottom panel}). The dust extinction corrected 24$\mu$m to B-band flux
464: ratio, as a function of the 24$\mu$m flux. Solid and empty symbols are for sources with UV reddening below or above the median, respectively.
465: In both panels, values on axis labeled with $L_{\rm IR}$ or $SFR$ are for an
466: average $z=1.9$ and were computed using the CE01 model reproducing the average SED
467: (Fig~\ref{fig:multi}).
468: }
469: \label{fig:B24pol}
470: \end{figure}
471: Sources with higher 24$\mu$m flux, however,
472: tend to have systematically larger ratios, and vice-versa.
473: This can be more clearly seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:B24pol} (bottom), where we
474: plot the 24$\mu$m to $B$-band flux ratio (with the $B$-band flux
475: here being corrected for dust reddening) as a function of the 24$\mu$m flux:
476: a clear trend with 24$\mu$m flux is present.
477: The expected K-correction term is small, and this plot
478: suggests that sources
479: with higher $L_{\rm IR}$ have progressively
480: larger fractions of the $SFR$ that cannot be
481: recovered from the UV luminosity even after
482: correcting for dust reddening. However,
483: such a strong trend is not reproduced using the radio data for the radio detected
484: objects. Fig.~\ref{fig:B24pol} (bottom) also shows that, at fixed $f_{24}$,
485: the
486: sources with bluer UV continua tend to have higher
487: corrected 24$\mu$m to $B$-band
488: flux ratio by a factor of 2 on average.
489:
490: Vigorous starbursts are present within the $BzK$ selected star forming
491: galaxies at $z=2$, which have also fairly large typical stellar masses of
492: $\sim10^{11}$M$_\odot$ for $K<20$ (Vega).
493: These masses would grow even larger
494: as a result of star formation, depending on the duty cycle of the
495: star formation event.
496: The high detection rate (82\%)
497: at 24$\mu$m supports the possibility that high $SFR$s among these $K<20$
498: sources are sustained for a substantially long amount of time during $1.4<z<2.5$.
499: When limiting to a common stellar mass threshold, e.g. $\simgt10^{11}M_\odot$, the space
500: densities of passively evolving galaxies is comparable to that of vigorous starbursts
501: within $1.4<z<2$, and perhaps much smaller at $2<z<2.5$ (Daddi
502: et al. 2005; Kong et al. 2005; McCarthy et al. 2004). This would suggest that the average duty
503: cycle is at least 50\%, and likely
504: more.
505: The Universe ages from 2.6 Gyr to 4.6 Gyr between $z=2.5$ and 1.4, and about
506: 1~Gyr is still available on average per galaxy before $z=1.4$, implying a
507: continuation of the star formation event for order 0.5~Gyr or more,
508: on average, and that typically these objects have been active for a similar
509: or larger amount of time before observations.
510: This is also consistent with the typical age of the present SF event inferred from the
511: optical/IR SED fitting with constant star formation rate models, which is mainly based
512: on the strength of the observed Balmer break
513: (about 0.7~Gyr; D04a; see also Shapley et al. 2005).
514: Therefore, by $z=1.4$ the typical mass of these
515: galaxies will have roughly doubled, reaching $\sim2\times10^{11}$M$_\odot$, on average.
516: From their observed space densities ($\sim2.3\times10^{-4}$~Mpc$^{-3}$)
517: and $SFR$s,
518: we infer that the integrated stellar mass density formed within $BzK>-0.2$
519: galaxies with $K<20$ in the 2~Gyr time within $1.4<z<2.5$ is
520: $\sim 10^{8}M_\odot$ Mpc$^{-3}$, independent of the duty cycle.
521: This is only $\sim20$\% of the local total stellar mass density, but is
522: comparable to the local stellar
523: mass density for objects with stellar mass $>2\times10^{11}$M$_\odot$
524: (Cole et al. 2001).
525: If the IMF at $z=2$ is similar to the local one, and in particular is not
526: a top-heavy IMF,
527: this suggests that by $z\approx1.4$ the assembly of the
528: high-mass tail ($>10^{11}$M$_\odot$) of present day's
529: galaxies mass function was, in a significant part, completed.
530: This is also supported by
531: the measurements, quoted above, of a comparable space densities of
532: old and passive
533: galaxies with similar masses to the star-forming $BzK$s
534: already existing at $1.4<z<2$,
535: and with the evidences (Papovich et al. 2005) of strongly declining specific $SFR$s for $z<1.4$ massive galaxies.
536: %\vspace{0.1truecm}
537: \acknowledgments
538: We thank the many other members of the GOODS team
539: who have helped to make these observations possible.
540: We are grateful
541: to Colin Borys for his work on the HDF-N SCUBA supermap and to the
542: anonymous referee and to the editor, John Scalo, for useful comments.
543: ED gratefully acknowledges NASA support through the Spitzer
544: Fellowship Program, award 1268429.
545: Support for this work, part of the Spitzer Space Telescope Legacy
546: Science Program, was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1224666
547: issued by the JPL, Caltech, under NASA contract 1407.
548:
549: \citeindexfalse
550:
551: \begin{thebibliography}{}
552: \bibitem[~]{2003MNRAS.344..385B} Borys C., Chapman S., Halpern M., Scott D., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 385
553: \bibitem[~]{2000ApJ...533..682C} Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R.~C., et al., 2000, ApJ, 533, 682
554: \bibitem[~]{2004AJ....127..180C} Capak P., et al., 2004, AJ, 127, 180
555: \bibitem[~]{2001ApJ...556..562C} Chary R., Elbaz D., 2001, ApJ, 556, 562 (CE01)
556: \bibitem[~]{2000MNRAS.319..168C} Cole S., et al., 2000, MNRAS, 319, 168
557: \bibitem[~]{cole2001}Cole, S., Norberg, P., Baugh, C. M., et al., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 255
558: \bibitem[~]{daddi04}Daddi E., Cimatti A., Renzini A., et al., 2004a, ApJ, 600, L127 (D04a)
559: \bibitem[~]{2004ApJ...617..746D} Daddi E., Cimatti A., Renzini A., et al., 2004b, ApJ, 617, 746 (D04b)
560: \bibitem[~]{2005ApJ...626..680D} Daddi E., et al., 2005, ApJ, 626, 680
561: \bibitem[~]{2003ApJ...587...25D} Dickinson M., Papovich C., Ferguson H.~C., Budav{\' a}ri T., 2003, ApJ, 587, 25
562: \bibitem[~]{1962ApJ...136..748E} Eggen O.~J., Lynden-Bell D., Sandage A.~R., 1962, ApJ, 136, 748
563: \bibitem[~]{1998ARA&A..36..189K} Kennicutt R.~C., 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 189
564: \bibitem[~]{kong} Kong X., Daddi E., Arimoto N., et al., 2005, ApJ, submitted
565: \bibitem[~]{ELF} Le Floc'h E., et al., 2005, ApJ in press (astro-ph/0506462)
566: \bibitem[~]{2004ApJ...614L...9M} McCarthy P.~J., et al., 2004, ApJ, 614, L9
567: \bibitem[~]{mignoli} Mignoli M., et al., 2005, A\&A, 437, 883
568: \bibitem[~]{DRGs} Papovich C., et al. 2005, submitted to ApJ
569: \bibitem[~]{2004A&A...419..849P} Persic M., Rephaeli Y., Braito V., et al., 2004, A\&A, 419, 849
570: \bibitem[~]{2005MNRAS.358..149P} Pope A., Borys C., Scott D., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 358, 149
571: \bibitem[~]{2003A&A...399...39R} Ranalli P., Comastri A., Setti G., 2003, A\&A, 399, 39
572: \bibitem[~]{2004ApJS..154..160R} Rigby J.~R., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 160
573: \bibitem[~]{2000ApJ...533..611R} Richards E.~A., 2000, ApJ, 533, 611
574: \bibitem[~]{2003ApJ...599..847R} Rudnick, G., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 847
575: \bibitem[~]{2003AJ....126.1607S} Sanders D.~B., Mazzarella J.~M., Kim D.-C., et al., 2003, AJ, 126, 1607
576: \bibitem[~]{2002MNRAS.331..817S} Scott S.~E., et al., 2002, MNRAS, 331, 817
577: \bibitem[~]{shapley} Shapley A., et al., 2005, ApJ, 626, 698
578: \bibitem[~]{2004ApJ...604..534S} Steidel, C.~C., Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, et al., 2004, \apj, 604, 534
579: \bibitem[~]{yan} Yan L., Chary R., Armus L., et al., 2005, ApJ in press (astro-ph/0504336)
580: \end{thebibliography}
581:
582:
583: \end{document}
584: