1: \documentclass{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \title{Mars Odyssey Joins The Third Interplanetary Network}
4: \author{K. Hurley}
5: \affil{University of California, Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450}
6: \email{khurley@ssl.berkeley.edu}
7: \author{I. Mitrofanov, A. Kozyrev, M. Litvak, A. Sanin, V. Grinkov and S. Charyshnikov}
8: \affil{Institute for Space Research, Moscow, Russia}
9: \author{W. Boynton, C. Fellows, K. Harshman, D. Hamara, and C. Shinohara}
10: \affil{Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tempe AZ}
11: \author{R. Starr}
12: \affil{The Catholic University of America, Department of Physics, Washington DC 20064}
13: \author{T. Cline}
14: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
15: %\author{THIS IS VERSION NUMBER 7}
16: \begin{abstract}
17:
18: The \it Mars Odyssey \rm spacecraft carries two experiments which are capable of detecting
19: cosmic gamma-ray bursts and soft gamma repeaters. Since April 2001 they have
20: detected over 275 bursts and, in conjunction with the other spacecraft
21: of the interplanetary network, localized many of them rapidly and precisely enough to allow
22: sensitive multi-wavelength counterpart searches. We present the \it Mars Odyssey \rm
23: mission and describe the burst capabilities of the two experiments in detail. We explain how the spacecraft
24: timing and ephemeris have been verified in-flight using bursts from objects whose
25: precise positions are known by other means. Finally, we
26: show several examples of localizations and discuss future
27: plans for the \it Odyssey \rm mission and the network as a whole.
28:
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \keywords{gamma-rays: bursts; catalogs}
32:
33: \section{Introduction}
34:
35: Interplanetary networks (IPNs) have played an important role in the studies of both
36: cosmic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) for over two
37: decades. Indeed, until the launch of \it BeppoSAX \rm in 1996, the only way to
38: derive arcminute positions for these objects was by comparing their arrival times at
39: distant spacecraft. The current (third) IPN was formed when the \it Ulysses \rm
40: spacecraft was launched in 1990. Over 25 spacecraft have participated in
41: the IPN since then, and the latest interplanetary mission to join the network
42: is \it Mars Odyssey \rm. It seems fitting that this spacecraft should belong to the IPN,
43: since ``Odyssey'' and ``Ulysses'' both refer to the same saga of distant voyages.
44: Today, the IPN comprises the \it Ulysses, Konus-Wind, Ramaty High Energy Solar
45: Spectroscopic Imager \rm (RHESSI)\it, High Energy Transient Explorer
46: \rm(HETE)\it, Swift, \rm and \it Mars Odyssey \rm (MO)
47: missions and experiments, and, with a detection rate of ~200 events/year,
48: is responsible for most GRB and SGR detections and localizations. As a distant point in
49: the network, MO plays a crucial role: without it, only localizations to annuli or large error boxes would
50: be possible. The triangulation, or arrival-time analysis method for localizing bursts has been
51: presented elsewhere (Hurley et al. 1999a,b). In this paper, we concentrate on the properties of the two
52: MO experiments which make burst detection possible. We note that this is the fifth attempt,
53: and the first successful one, to place a GRB detector in Mars orbit; the four previous attempts,
54: aboard the \it Phobos 1 \& 2 \rm (Sagdeev and Zakharov 1990) \it , Mars Observer \rm
55: (Metzger et al. 1992), and \it Mars '96 \rm (Ziock et al. 1997) missions, met with limited or
56: no success due to mission failures.
57:
58:
59: \section{The \it Mars Odyssey \bf Mission}
60:
61: The \it Mars Odyssey \rm mission is an orbiter whose objective is to provide a better understanding
62: of the climate and geologic history of Mars. It was launched on 2001 April 7, and after a 6 month cruise phase,
63: reached Mars on 2001 October 24. The mission then entered an aerobraking phase to circularize the orbit
64: which lasted until 2002 January. At the end of this phase, the spacecraft was orbiting
65: the planet every 1.964 h at an altitude between 370 and 432 km (Saunders et al. 2004). The prime scientific mission
66: then commenced, and at present, \it Odyssey \rm is in its first extended mission, which will continue
67: through 2006 September; a mission extension beyond that date is likely.
68:
69: The spacecraft is shown in figure 1. In its present orbit, Mars subtends approximately 27\% of the sky
70: (62 $\arcdeg$ half-angle) at the Odyssey spacecraft. In general, the instruments are powered on continuously, and almost 100\% of
71: the data is downlinked through the Deep Space Network during daily tracking passes. A more complete
72: description of the mission has appeared in Saunders et al. (2004).
73:
74: \subsection{The Gamma Sensor Head and the High Energy Neutron Detector}
75:
76: The Gamma-Ray Spectrometer (GRS) is an instrument suite which includes two detectors
77: with GRB detection capabilities, the gamma sensor head (GSH), and the High Energy Neutron
78: Detector (HEND).
79: The principal objective of the GRS experiment is the determination of the
80: elemental abundances on Mars. The GSH consists of a 6.7 cm diameter $\times$ 6.7 cm high
81: (cross sectional area to GRBs $\sim$ 40 cm$^{2}$) right circular
82: cylindrical germanium detector which is passively cooled and mounted on a boom extending
83: 6 m from the body of the spacecraft. It records energy spectra between
84: $\sim$ 50 keV and 10 MeV
85: in a low time resolution mode ($\sim$20 s) until triggered by a burst.
86: It then records GRB time histories
87: in a single energy channel with 32 ms resolution for 19.75 s, and can
88: retrigger immediately thereafter. The boom extension and detector cooling did not take place until after the end of the
89: aerobraking phase, and thus the experiment did not collect useful GRB data until then. The in-orbit
90: background rate is ~100 c/s in the GRB energy channel, but it undergoes variations
91: due to numerous causes. In order of decreasing importance, these
92: are a) the albedo from the cosmic gamma-ray background from the Martian surface, which
93: is different for different regions of the planet, b) seasonal changes on $\sim$ month
94: timescales such as CO$_2$ condensation in the polar cap regions (which
95: suppresses the upcoming gamma-radiation from the surface of the planet), and c) solar
96: proton events. The GSH is
97: shown in figure 2. More details may be found in Boynton et al. (2004).
98:
99: The burst detection portion of the HEND experiment is
100: based on two optically separate scintillation detectors (figure 3). The first is a cylindrical stilbene
101: crystal with a diameter of 30 mm and a height of 10 mm, which is used for the detection of
102: high energy neutrons, and records gamma-rays as a by-product. These counts
103: are measured continuously in the 350-3000 keV range with a time resolution of 1 second.
104: The second detector is a cylindrical CsI(Tl) anti-coincidence well surrounding the stilbene,
105: whose thickness is 10 mm, whose outer diameter is 50 mm, and whose height is 49 mm. Thus its
106: cross-sectional area to GRBs varies between $19.6$ cm$^2$ (on-axis), $24.5$ cm$^{2}$
107: (90 $\arcdeg$ off-axis), and $7.1$ cm$^{2}$ (180 $\arcdeg$ off-axis).
108: In triggered mode, counts from the CsI are recorded in the $\sim$
109: 30-1300 keV energy range with a time resolution of 250 ms,
110: and these data are used for triangulation. The upper and lower energy limits
111: are only approximate, since the light collection in the cylindrical crystal depends
112: upon the photon interaction point. Energy spectra are not transmitted.
113: The capacity of the counters is limited to 511 counts every 250 ms, so very strong
114: bursts can temporarily saturate the detector. HEND is mounted on the body
115: of the spacecraft. The in-orbit background rates are $\sim 5$ counts/sec for the inner stilbene detector,
116: and $\sim 130$ counts/sec for the CsI anticoincidence.
117: Both these rates undergo variations for the same reasons as the GSH, and in addition,
118: because of HEND's lower energy threshold, due to trapped particles. For example, for a period
119: of approximately 7 months starting on November 11, 2002, the background variations along the
120: orbit increased from their nominal value of about a factor of 2 to a factor of 30.
121: The cause of this increase is suspected to be trapped particles. During this time, the duty cycle for
122: GRB detection decreased by a factor of 3.4. These large variations disappeared around
123: June 9, 2003. Occasionally they reappear rather reduced in strength. A background
124: plot is shown in figure 4.
125: More details of the instrument may be found in Boynton et al. (2004).
126:
127:
128: \section{Burst Detection and Statistics}
129:
130: Bursts are detected in HEND and the GSH in different ways. HEND is equipped with an
131: on-board trigger, but the telemetry allocation made it possible to transmit triggered data continuously.
132: Thus the trigger level was set to a value below the background level, and in effect, the
133: experiment triggers continuously and produces continuous data with 250 ms time resolution.
134: Searches for bursts in the HEND data may therefore be initiated by detections on other
135: IPN spacecraft, and may be carried out in the ground analysis. Every candidate event detected by an IPN spacecraft
136: initiates such a search, and almost all the bursts detected by HEND to date have been found by searching
137: the data in the crossing time window which corresponds to these candidate events.
138: (Thus, for example, in the case of an event detected by \it Ulysses \rm,
139: the crossing time window is the Mars-Ulysses distance expressed in light-seconds;
140: the maximum distance is $\sim$ 3000 light-seconds.) Up to now,
141: no exhaustive automatic ``blind'' search for bursts has been carried out in the HEND data, although
142: an algorithm to do this is being developed and tested. GSH burst data, on
143: the other hand, come only from on-board triggers; each trigger initiates a search for a
144: confirming event in the
145: data of the other IPN spacecraft in the appropriate crossing time windows.
146: As high time resolution GSH data are only available for
147: triggered events, it is usually not practical to search the data for bursts detected by other
148: spacecraft.
149:
150: HEND was turned on during the cruise phase
151: and detected its first confirmed GRB on 2001 May 8. In the 1520 days
152: which followed, HEND and/or
153: GRS have detected $>$ 275 GRBs or SGRs which have been confirmed by detection aboard at least one other IPN spacecraft.
154: Thus the average burst detection rate during the cruise and orbital phases is about one burst every
155: 5.9 d. This number is an average over the entire period, and does not take high background
156: periods, or times when the experiments were turned off, into account. The true rate
157: would therefore be higher. Initially, the spacecraft timing was not determined accurately
158: during the cruise phase and no triangulation results were announced.
159: (These data have since been reprocessed for accurate timing.)
160: Thus the \it Odyssey \rm mission became most useful to the IPN when it entered its orbital phase;
161: at that point its separation from Earth was large enough for the triangulation method to produce small error boxes,
162: and the timing was known to good accuracy in real time.
163: The typical IPN annulus width as a function of time over the mission is shown in figure 5.
164:
165: The GRB detection rate by 3 widely separated spacecraft (that is, \it Mars Odyssey,
166: Ulysses\rm, and any near-Earth mission) is about 1 every 7 days. It is interesting to
167: note that this rate is identical to that which was obtained when
168: the \it Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous \rm (NEAR) mission was the other distant spacecraft
169: in addition to \it Ulysses \rm. These numbers do not depend strongly
170: upon any comparison of the MO and NEAR instrument sensitivities, for the following
171: reason. Due to its
172: small size, \it Ulysses \rm tends to be the least sensitive detector in the network.
173: We are counting only those bursts which were detected by \it Ulysses\rm, a
174: near-Earth spacecraft, and another, distant spacecraft. As long as the sensitivities of
175: the near-Earth and the distant spacecraft are greater than that of \it Ulysses \rm, the
176: burst rate is determined primarily by \it Ulysses' \rm sensitivity, rather than by that
177: of the other detectors.
178:
179: Figure 6 presents the distribution of the angles between
180: the HEND detector axis, which is always pointed towards Mars in the orbital phase of the
181: mission, and the GRBs detected by it. This distribution agrees with the wide
182: field of view of the CsI anticoincidence, which is limited mainly by the Mars horizon;
183: the body of the spacecraft blocks a small fraction of the sky with relatively low atomic number
184: materials.
185:
186:
187: Figure 7 compares the count rates for events detected by HEND and \it
188: Ulysses \rm. Since the HEND count rate is roughly proportional to that of \it Ulysses \rm,
189: this relation can be used for an approximate estimate of the fluence of HEND bursts.
190: The weakest confirmed GRB detected by HEND to date had a fluence of about
191: $\rm 1.5 \times 10^{-6} erg\, cm^{-2}$.
192:
193:
194: \section{Verifying the IPN results}
195:
196: Whenever a new spacecraft enters the network, both its timing and its ephemeris must
197: be verified in-flight. There are various ways to do this, but the most effective end-to-end
198: test is to triangulate bursts whose positions are known with greater precision than that
199: obtainable from the IPN alone. This includes events (cosmic or SGR) localized with X-ray cameras,
200: and events with radio, X-ray, or optical counterparts. To date, 12 GRBs which meet one
201: or more of these criteria, 5 bursts
202: from SGR1900+14, and 14 bursts from SGR1806-20 have been
203: used to verify \it Odyssey's \rm timing and ephemeris. In these verifications, the
204: triangulation is usually done using \it Odyssey \rm and a near-Earth spacecraft,
205: for which station-keeping is much simpler and more accurate, so that the timing and
206: ephemeris uncertainties for this spacecraft are negligible.
207:
208: When such events are triangulated, a ``time shift'' can be derived, which is the amount of time which would
209: have to be added to the \it Odyssey \rm time to obtain perfect agreement between the annulus
210: derived from the \it Odyssey \rm data, and the known source position. This time shift is therefore a measure
211: of the combination of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the triangulation. The
212: statistical uncertainty depends only on the statistics of the two time histories which
213: are being compared, and it is estimated in the cross-correlation analysis.
214: The systematic uncertainty in these triangulations, which is a combination of timing and ephemeris errors,
215: is always found to be much less than the statistical one.
216:
217: \section{Some scientific highlights}
218:
219: \subsection{GRB020405}
220:
221: This event was observed by \it Ulysses, Mars Odyssey, Konus, \rm and \it BeppoSAX \rm (the GRBM experiment).
222: The HEND and \it Ulysses \rm time histories are shown in figure 8. The first localization, to a 75 square arcminute
223: error box, was produced within 16.6 hours (Hurley et al., 2002a). Multi-wavelength observations
224: of the afterglow were carried out by numerous ground- and space-based telescopes. An optical
225: transient was identified in the error box (figure 9), and a redshift of 0.695 was found
226: for it (Masetti et al. 2003). A bump in the optical afterglow light curve advanced the
227: case for a supernova/GRB connection (Dado, Dar, and de Rujula 2002; Masetti et al. 2003; Price et al. 2003).
228: Polarization studies of the optical afterglow were used to constrain the dust
229: content of the host galaxy (Covino et al. 2002). Masetti et al. (2003) achieved the
230: first detection of an afterglow in the NIR bands, and the
231: first detection of a galaxy responsible for an intervening absorption line system in the spectrum of
232: a GRB afterglow.
233: Observations of a radio flare and of the the X-ray afterglow were
234: used to deduce the nature of the surrounding medium (Berger et al. 2003;
235: Mirabal et al. 2003; Chevalier et al. 2004).
236:
237: \subsection{GRB020813}
238:
239: This event was observed by \it Ulysses, Mars Odyssey, Konus, \rm, and HETE. The HETE
240: WXM and SXC produced localizations (Villasenor et al. 2002) which were used by Fox, Blake, and
241: Price (2002) to identify the optical counterpart, whose redshift was measured to be 1.2
242: (Price et al. 2002). The IPN error box had an area
243: of 33 square arcminutes, and was circulated 24 hours after the burst (Hurley et al. 2002b,c). It
244: constrains the HETE positions, agrees with the
245: optical position (figure 10), and serves both to verify them, and to confirm the
246: \it Odyssey \rm timing and ephemeris.
247:
248: \subsection{GRB021206}
249:
250: This event was detected by \it Ulysses, Mars Odyssey, Konus, \rm RHESSI,
251: and INTEGRAL (Hurley et al. 2002d, 2003). Polarization
252: was detected in gamma-rays for this burst by RHESSI (Coburn and Boggs 2003; but see also
253: Rutledge and Fox, 2004 and Coburn and Boggs, 2004), and
254: the burst time history was used to set limits on the quantum gravity energy scale (Boggs et al. 2004). This event
255: is a good example of the utility of the IPN technique. The IPN as a whole has isotropic
256: response, and this burst occurred only 18 degrees from the Sun. Thus it is unlikely that it could
257: have been detected and localized by INTEGRAL, HETE, or \it Swift \rm due to pointing constraints. Since
258: RHESSI is the only spacecraft which has a demonstrated polarization measurement capability,
259: and it points in the solar direction, only IPN-localized bursts can benefit from
260: polarization measurements.
261:
262: \subsection{The giant flare from SGR1806-20}
263:
264: An event which occurred on 2004 December 27 was the most intense burst
265: of X- and gamma-radiation detected to date (Hurley et al. 2005). Although it was
266: observed by at least 20 spacecraft, none of them could localize it. The precise
267: localization, which was a key element in identifying the source, was done by
268: triangulation using \it Odyssey\rm. The burst turned out to be a giant flare from SGR1806-20.
269: This SGR was only about 5 \arcdeg from the Sun at the time of the burst.
270:
271: \section{Conclusions}
272:
273: The GSH and HEND experiments aboard the \it Mars Odyssey \rm spacecraft
274: have been successfully integrated into the third interplanetary network. In this configuration, the
275: IPN is producing rapid, precise GRB localizations at the expected rate, and should
276: continue to do so for the forseeable future. With the advent of newer missions, with much
277: greater sensitivities, and which are
278: capable of independently determining GRB positions to better accuracies and with
279: shorter delays, the question inevitably arises whether it is useful to maintain an IPN.
280: There are several arguments in favor of this. The new missions achieve their
281: accuracy and sensitivity at the expense of sky converage; typically they view only 10 - 20\% of
282: the sky, while the IPN is isotropic. Thus, first, IPNs serve as continuous monitors
283: of SGR activity throughout the galaxy, which the newer missions do not. Second, IPNs will detect strong
284: bursts at a rate which is 5-10 times greater than that of the newer missions. Therefore IPNs
285: should continue to serve a useful role in GRB and SGR studies for years to come.
286:
287:
288:
289: \section{Acknowledgments}
290:
291: We are grateful to John Laros for the initial work which made GRB detection possible
292: aboard Odyssey. KH acknowledges support under the NASA Long Term Space Astrophysics
293: and Odyssey Participating Scientist programs, FDNAG-5-11451.
294:
295: \clearpage
296:
297: \begin{references}
298:
299:
300: \reference{} Berger, E., Soderberg, A., Frail, D., and Kulkarni, S., 2003, Ap. J. 587, L5
301:
302: \reference{} Boggs, S., Wunderer, C., Hurley, K., and Coburn, W., 2004, Ap. J. 611, L77
303:
304: \reference{} Boynton, W., et al. 2004, Space Sci. Rev. 110, 37
305:
306: \reference{} Chevalier, R., Li, Z-Y., and Fransson, C., 2004, Ap. J. 606, 369
307:
308: \reference{} Coburn, W., and Boggs, S., 2003, Nature 423, 415
309:
310: \reference{} Coburn, W., and Boggs, S., 2004, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 350, 1288
311:
312: \reference{} Covino, S., et al. 2003, Astron. Astrophys. 400, L9
313:
314: \reference{} Dado, S., Dar, A., and De Rujula, A., 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 393, L25
315:
316: \reference{} Fox, D., Blake, C., and Price, P., 2002, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1470
317:
318: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al. 1999a, \apjs \, 120, 399
319:
320: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al. 1999b, \apjs \, 122, 497
321:
322: \reference{} Hurley, K. et al., 2002a, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1325
323:
324: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al., 2002b, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1482
325:
326: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al., 2002c, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1483
327:
328: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al., 2002d, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1728
329:
330: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al., 2003, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 2281
331:
332: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al., 2005, Nature 434, 1098
333:
334: \reference{} Jernigan, J. G., et al., 2002, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1494
335:
336: \reference{} Masetti, N., et al. 2003, Astron. Astrophys. 404, 465
337:
338: \reference{} Metzger, A., Boynton, W., Laros, J., and Trombka, J., 1992,
339: in AIP Conf. Proc. 265, Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. W. Paciesas \& G. Fishman (New York: AIP Press), 353
340:
341: \reference{} Mirabal, N., Paerels, F., and Halpern, J., 2003, Ap. J. 587, 128
342:
343: \reference{} Price, P., Bloom, J., Goodrich, R., Barth, A., Cohen, M., and Fox, D.,
344: 2002, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1475
345:
346: \reference{} Price, P., et al. 2003, Ap. J. 589, 838
347:
348: \reference{} Rutledge, R., and Fox, D., 2004, M.N.R.A.S. 350, 1288
349:
350: \reference{} Sagdeev, R.,and Zakharov, A., 1990, Sov. Astron. Lett. 16(2), 125
351:
352: \reference{} Saunders, R., et al. 2004, Space Sci. Rev. 110, 1
353:
354: \reference{} Villasenor, J., et al. 2002, Gamma-ray Burst Coordinates Network Circular 1471
355:
356: \reference{} Ziock, K., et al. 1997, IEEE Trans. Nuc. Sci. 44(4), 1692
357:
358:
359: \end{references}
360:
361:
362:
363:
364: %\clearpage
365:
366: \begin{figure}
367: \figurenum{1}
368: %\epsscale{0.8}
369: \plotone{f1.eps}
370: \caption{The \it Mars Odyssey \rm spacecraft, showing the positions of the
371: HEND and GSH experiments, on the body of the spacecraft and on the boom,
372: respectively.
373: }
374: \end{figure}
375:
376: %\clearpage
377:
378: \begin{figure}
379: \figurenum{2}
380: \epsscale{0.8}
381: \plotone{f2.eps}
382: \caption{Cross section of the gamma sensor head, showing the germanium
383: detector and the cooler. The upper part of the head faces into space,
384: and Mars is toward the bottom.
385: }
386: \end{figure}
387:
388:
389: %\clearpage
390:
391: \begin{figure}
392: \figurenum{3}
393: \epsscale{0.5}
394: \plotone{f3.eps}
395: \caption{The High Energy Neutron Detector (HEND) experiment. The detector
396: axis points towards the top of the figure, and is indicated by the center line.
397: In the orbital phase of the mission, it points towards the nadir, that is,
398: towards the surface of Mars.
399: }
400: \end{figure}
401:
402:
403: %\clearpage
404:
405: \begin{figure}
406: \figurenum{4}
407: \epsscale{0.6}
408: \plotone{f4.eps}
409: \caption{A $\sim$ 9000 s (1.27 orbits) plot of the GSH (bottom, left hand axis) and HEND
410: (top, right hand axis) counting rates on 2003 March 29, starting at 35580 s).
411: A bright gamma-ray burst occurred around 6600 s.}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414: %\clearpage
415:
416: \begin{figure}
417: \figurenum{5}
418: \epsscale{0.8}
419: \plotone{f5.eps}
420: \caption{Typical width of an IPN annulus obtained by triangulation between
421: \it Mars Odyssey \rm and a near-Earth spacecraft, as a function of time.
422: The left-hand scale shows the \it Odyssey \rm Earth distance in light-seconds
423: (solid line),
424: and the right-hand scale gives the annulus width in arcminutes (dotted line). A cross-correlation
425: uncertainty of 200 milliseconds and a GRB arrival angle 30 $\degr$ from the Mars-Earth
426: vector have been assumed.
427: }
428: \end{figure}
429:
430:
431: %\clearpage
432:
433: \begin{figure}
434: \figurenum{6}
435: \epsscale{0.6}
436: \plotone{f6.eps}
437: \caption{The angular distribution of GRBs detected by HEND during the orbital
438: phase of the mission, relative to the detector axis.
439: The detector axis is pointed towards Mars in the orbital phase, so no bursts are detected
440: at angles less than roughly 60 $\degr$. Around 180 $\degr$, the relatively small detection
441: cross-section (see figure 3) and spacecraft-blocking reduce the number of detections.
442: }
443: \end{figure}
444:
445:
446:
447: \begin{figure}
448: \figurenum{7}
449: \epsscale{0.6}
450: \plotone{f7.eps}
451: \caption{The integrated counts for 87 GRBs detected by \it Ulysses \rm
452: in the 25 - 150 keV energy range, versus the
453: integrated counts detected by HEND in the 30 - 1300 keV range. The \it Ulysses \rm detector has an approximately
454: isotropic response, while the HEND cross-sectional area varies considerably
455: depending on the arrival direction. This, as well as the spectral differences of the
456: bursts, explains much of the
457: scatter in the points. However, the HEND counts are approximately equal
458: to the \it Ulysses \rm counts times a factor of 0.63 (straight line fit to the points).
459: The approximate fluences of the \it Ulysses \rm bursts are indicated.
460: }
461: \end{figure}
462:
463: %\clearpage
464:
465:
466:
467: \begin{figure}
468: \figurenum{8}
469: \epsscale{1.}
470: \plotone{f8.eps}
471: \caption{The time histories of GRB020405, as detected by HEND and \it
472: Ulysses \rm. \it Ulysses \rm triggered late in the burst.
473: }
474: \end{figure}
475:
476:
477: %\clearpage
478:
479: \begin{figure}
480: \figurenum{9}
481: \epsscale{0.8}
482: \plotone{f9.eps}
483: \caption{The final, 14 sq. arcmin. IPN error box for GRB020405, defined by
484: the 2.3\arcmin wide \it Ulysses-Odyssey \rm and 1.5\arcmin wide \it Ulysses-BeppoSAX \rm annuli.
485: The position of the optical transient detected by
486: Price et al. (2003) is indicated.
487: }
488: \end{figure}
489:
490:
491: %\clearpage
492:
493: \begin{figure}
494: \figurenum{10}
495: %\epsscale{0.8}
496: \plotone{f10.eps}
497: \caption{IPN and HETE localizations of GRB020813. The IPN error box is defined by
498: the intersection of the 2.7 \arcmin wide \it Ulysses-Konus\rm \, annulus and the
499: 3.7 \arcmin \it Ulysses-Odyssey\rm \, annulus. The initial HETE SXC error circle
500: shown here was later revised by Jernigan et al. (2002) and agrees with the
501: position of the optical transient source (OT).
502: }
503: \end{figure}
504:
505:
506: %\clearpage
507:
508:
509:
510:
511: \end{document}
512: