1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\axp{\hbox{AX~J1844.8$-$0256}}
4: \def\taxp{\hbox{XTE~J1810$-$197}}
5:
6: \newcommand\xte{{\it RXTE\/}}
7: \newcommand\chandra{{\it Chandra}}
8: \newcommand\xmm{{\it XMM-Newton}}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Radio Emission from TAXP XTE J1810$-$197}
11: \shortauthors{Halpern et al.}
12:
13: \slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal Letters}
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Discovery of Radio Emission from Transient Anomalous
17: X-ray Pulsar XTE J1810$-$197}
18:
19: \author{J. P. Halpern\altaffilmark{1}, E. V. Gotthelf\altaffilmark{2},
20: R. H. Becker\altaffilmark{3}, D. J. Helfand\altaffilmark{1}, and
21: R. L. White\altaffilmark{4}}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Columbia
24: University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027;
25: jules,djh@astro.columbia.edu}
26: \altaffiltext{2}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University,
27: 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027;
28: eric@astro.columbia.edu}
29: \altaffiltext{3}{Physics Department, University of California,
30: 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; and Institute of Geophysics and
31: Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore,
32: CA 94550; bob@igpp.ucllnl.org}
33: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
34: Baltimore, MD 21218; rlw@stsci.edu}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We report the first detection of radio emission from any anomalous
38: X-ray pulsar (AXP). Data from the Very Large Array (VLA) MAGPIS survey
39: with angular resolution $6^{\prime\prime}$ reveals a point-source
40: of flux density $4.5 \pm 0.5$ mJy at 1.4 GHz at the precise location
41: of the 5.54~s pulsar \taxp.
42: This is greater than upper limits from
43: all other AXPs and from quiescent states of soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs).
44: The detection was made in 2004 January, 1~year
45: after the discovery of \taxp\ during its only known outburst.
46: Additional VLA observations both before and after the outburst yield
47: only upper limits that are comparable to or larger than the
48: single detection, neither supporting nor ruling out a decaying radio
49: afterglow related to the X-ray turn-on. Another hypothesis is that,
50: unlike the other AXPs and SGRs, \taxp\ may power a radio synchrotron
51: nebula by the interaction of its particle wind with a moderately
52: dense environment that was not evacuated by previous activity from this
53: least luminous, in X-rays, of the known magnetars.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: \keywords{pulsars: general --- pulsars: individual (XTE J1810$-$197,
57: AX J1844.8$-$0256) --- radio continuum: stars --- X-rays: stars}
58:
59: \section{Introduction}
60:
61: According to the magnetar theory of AXPs and SGRs \citep{dun92},
62: the high-energy radiation of these slow
63: pulsars ($5 < P < 12$\,s) is supplied not by magnetic braking of
64: their rotation, which is insufficient, but from particle acceleration
65: and/or internal heating that is powered by the decay of an enormous
66: magnetic field ($B \geq B_{\rm QED} = 4.4 \times 10^{13}$~G).
67: The absence of radio emission is a defining characteristic of AXPs.
68: Radio emission from magnetars has only been seen following impulsive
69: high-energy events from two SGRs. Specifically, a radio source
70: detected within a few days of the intense 1998~August~27 $\gamma$-ray burst
71: from SGR~1900+14 faded rapidly during the following month \citep*{fra99}.
72: The giant flare of SGR~1806$-$20 on 2004~December~27
73: \citep{hur05,pal05} was accompanied by a radio source that exhibited
74: a complex decay \citep{cam05,gae05b}. No radio transient
75: has been recorded from an AXP, e.g., after a bursting episode of 1E~2259+586
76: \citep{kas02}, and no {\it persistent\/} radio emission, whether
77: compact or extended, has been clearly attributed to an AXP or an SGR.
78:
79: The transient AXP \taxp\ is a 5.54~s X-ray pulsar discovered
80: by \cite{ibr04} using the {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer} (\xte),
81: and located to subarcsecond precision by \chandra\ and infrared
82: counterpart detections \citep{got04b,isr04}. When discovered in a high state,
83: the source was already decaying exponentially with a time constant of
84: $270$~days \citep{ibr04} from a recorded maximum flux $F_X (2-10\ {\rm keV})
85: \approx 6 \times 10^{-11}$ ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. The onset
86: and initial properties of the outburst were not observed,
87: but \xte\ scans restrict the epoch of the event to between 2002 November
88: and 2003 January. Archival X-ray detections of the previously anonymous
89: source indicate a steady
90: quiescent state with flux two orders-of-magnitude less than the maximum
91: measured value. Detailed interpretation of the decaying X-ray outburst of
92: \taxp\ using \xmm, as well as its historical X-ray properties, were reported
93: by \citet{got04b}, \citet{hal05}, and \citet{got05}.
94:
95: This Letter presents a unique VLA detection of \taxp\ 1~year
96: after its X-ray outburst, and upper limits from other archival VLA data
97: that restrict its spectrum and pattern of variability.
98: Possible origins of the radio emission are explored,
99: and comparisons are made to upper limits from other AXPs, and to transient
100: radio detections that followed outbursts of SGRs. Although the
101: distance to \taxp\ is highly uncertain, we adopt here $d=2.5$~kpc following
102: the argument in \citet{got05}. This is a revision of the larger estimates
103: used in earlier papers.
104:
105: \section{Observations and Analysis}
106:
107: Observations at 1.4~GHz of the region containing \taxp\
108: were obtained on several days in 2004 January as part of
109: the VLA Multi-Array Galactic Plane Imaging Survey
110: \citep*[MAGPIS;][]{hel05}\footnote{http://third.ucllnl.org/gps}
111: A total of 15 min of exposure were
112: accumulated in B configuration, with a resulting beam
113: ${\rm FWHM} = 6^{\prime\prime}$ and rms sensitivity 0.5~mJy per beam.
114: Figure~\ref{image} shows the resulting image centered on the
115: \chandra\ coordinates of \taxp\ given in \citet{got04b},
116: R.A. $18^{\rm h}09^{\rm m}51.\!^{\rm s}08$, Decl.
117: $-19^{\circ}43^{\prime}51.\!^{\prime\prime}7$ (J2000.0).
118: A definite radio source is detected with flux density $4.5 \pm 0.5$ mJy
119: at coordinates R.A. $18^{\rm h}09^{\rm m}51.\!^{\rm s}14$, Decl.
120: $-19^{\circ}43^{\prime}51.\!^{\prime\prime}2$ (J2000.0),
121: within $1^{\prime\prime}$ of the \chandra\ position, which
122: in turn is identical to the coordinates of its IR counterpart \citep{isr04}.
123: The difference is comparable to the combined astrometric
124: uncertainty of both instruments.
125: Since the radio source is the only one within a $3^{\prime}\!.5$
126: radius of the pulsar, the probability that it is a chance coincidence
127: of an unrelated object within a radius of $1^{\prime\prime}$
128: can be estimated at $\sim 2 \times 10^{-5}$, and the identification
129: on the basis of position alone is compelling.
130: The radio source extent is unresolved, from which we infer an
131: upper limit on its intrinsic radius of $3^{\prime\prime}$, or
132: $r < 1.1 \times 10^{17}\,d_{2.5}$~cm, where $d_{2.5}$ is the
133: distance in units of 2.5~kpc.
134:
135: We then analyzed several VLA observations from earlier Galactic
136: plane surveys \citep*{whi05} and other archival data,
137: with results listed in Table~\ref{obslog}. Only upper
138: limits are obtained from these observations, including
139: the ones reported by \citet{gae03}.
140: When quoted at the $3 \sigma$ level, nearly all of the upper
141: limits are higher than the single detection.
142: Therefore, they contain little information about intrinsic variability
143: of the source. However, two VLA upper limits obtained in 2003,
144: following the X-ray outburst of \taxp, restrict
145: an hypothesized power-law decay to $t^{-0.6}$ or slower.
146: The upper limit of 3.6~mJy in 2004 March is then
147: in mild conflict with the detection in 2004 January.
148: If, on the other hand, the source is truly
149: constant, then the spectrum from $0.33-4.8$~GHz cannot be fitted with
150: a single power law of the form $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{\alpha}$.
151: The upper limit of 1~mJy at 4.8~GHz requires $\alpha < -1.1$ between
152: 1.4 and 4.8~GHz, while the upper limit of 10.5~mJy at 330~MHz
153: requires $\alpha > -0.66$ between 330~MHz and 1.4~GHz. The implied
154: spectral curvature might be intrinsic, or the onset of
155: self absorption; alternatively, variability is required.
156:
157: We also inspected the MAGPIS 1.4~GHz B configuration image for another
158: transient AXP candidate, \axp\ \citep{got98,tor98},
159: which yields a $3 \sigma$ upper limit of 0.5~mJy for a point source
160: at R.A. $18^{\rm h}44^{\rm m}54.\!^{\rm s}69$, Decl.
161: $-02^{\circ}56^{\prime}53.\!^{\prime\prime}4$ (J2000.0).
162: We derived this position from the sum of several archival \chandra\ images.
163: This 6.97~s pulsar associated with a supernova remnant \citep*{gae99}
164: remains only a candidate AXP because its period derivative has not yet
165: been measured due to a dramatic reduction in its X-ray flux \citep*{vas00}.
166:
167: \section{Discussion}
168:
169: No radio pulsations have been detected from AXPs,
170: with pulsed flux density limits $< 0.1$~mJy at 1.4~GHz
171: obtained for most sources \citep{mer02}.
172: It is not yet established by statistics alone whether the small set of
173: AXPs are intrinsically radio quiet or just unfavorably oriented,
174: their long periods implying small active polar caps and narrow beams.
175: Neither has persistent radio emission
176: been seen from this class until now, although flux limits
177: from interferometric imaging, listed in Table~\ref{compare},
178: are generally not as deep as the single-dish searches for pulsed flux.
179: Although the VLA source associated with \taxp\ is spatially unresolved,
180: the bulk of its flux is unlikely to be due to magnetospheric
181: pulsar emission. A 4.5~mJy source pulsed at the 5.54~s X-ray
182: period should be easily detected in the Parkes Multibeam Pulsar Survey
183: operating at 1.4~GHz, as have other long-period, high $B$-field
184: pulsars \citep[e.g.,][]{mcl03} that are at least an order-of-magnitude
185: fainter. Therefore, we assume that most of the emission is
186: incoherent synchrotron radiation arising from well outside the
187: light cylinder, $r_{\rm lc} = 2.6 \times 10^{10}$~cm, but within
188: the VLA resolution limit $r = 10^{17}$~cm. Its brightness temperature
189: is then $T_{\rm B} = 100\,(d_{2.5}/r_{17})^2$~K, and it is probably larger
190: than $10^{12}$~cm, assuming that $T_{\rm B} < 10^{12}$~K.
191:
192: To put the unique radio detection of \taxp\ in context, we note
193: that its radio flux density is larger than all of the
194: upper limits from other AXPs (Table~\ref{compare}),
195: but its radio luminosity is demonstrably larger than only two or three,
196: considering that the
197: distances to AXPs, as tabulated by \citet{mer02} and \citet{woo06},
198: may be uncertain by a factor of 2. The radio detection
199: of \taxp\ may be a significant clue into the physics of its class.
200: \taxp\ differs from other AXPs in two respects. First, it is transient,
201: with an X-ray luminosity that is comparable to the persistent AXPs only
202: near the peak of its outburst.
203: Second, its quiescent state may be long-lived, so that its time-averaged
204: X-ray luminosity could be two orders-of-magnitude less than the others.
205: The only other transient X-ray source in Table~\ref{compare} is \axp,
206: but its distance is uncertain and possibly large \citep{gae99}, so its
207: radio luminosity is not necessarily smaller than that of \taxp.
208:
209: An obvious hypothesis, that the 2004 January radio luminosity
210: of \taxp\ is a transient afterglow that originated with the 2003
211: January X-ray outburst, is problematic.
212: First, there is the twice documented absence of a more luminous radio
213: source in the months following the X-ray outburst, in 2003 February and
214: April. It is also notable that no radio source, to a limit of
215: $50\,\mu$Jy, was detected 2 days after an X-ray outburst and glitch of
216: the AXP 1E~2259+586 \citep{kas02}.
217: Second, there was no evidence for any soft $\gamma$-ray outburst
218: from \taxp\ resembling the flares of the SGRs, only a slowly decaying,
219: thermal X-ray spectrum that integrated over a time scale of 300 days
220: to a total energy of $\sim 4 \times 10^{42}\,d^2_{2.5}$ ergs \citep{got05}.
221: In fact, it is possible that \taxp\ was {\it never} more luminous than
222: a normal AXP. Its activity is perhaps better characterized as a
223: turn-on than an outburst, and is in marked contrast to the $10^{46}$
224: ergs $\gamma$-ray flare of SGR 1806$-$20 in 2004 December \citep{hur05,pal05}.
225:
226: Third, only in the aftermath of
227: giant flares from the SGR 1806$-$20 and 1900+14 have decaying
228: radio sources been detected by the VLA, and even these were
229: faint and short-lived. In the case of SGR 1900+14,
230: the peak 1.4~GHz flux density 10 days after the 1998 August flare
231: was 0.7~mJy \citep{fra99}, but it decayed as a power law of index
232: $-2.6$ and was no longer detectable after 1~month. Just 1.6 days
233: after another burst activation from SGR 1900+14 in 2001 April,
234: no radio emission was detected to a $5 \sigma$ limit of 0.45 mJy at 5~GHz
235: \citep{kou01}, which was not unexpected since the $\gamma$-ray
236: fluence of the 2001 burst was 25 times smaller than the 1998 burst.
237: The 2004 December giant flare from SGR 1806$-$20 produced
238: a radio source initially detected at 178 mJy at 1.4~GHz,
239: which faded to 10 mJy after 50 days \citep{cam05}.
240: Extrapolated to 1~year, SGR 1806$-$20 should be as faint
241: in the radio as \taxp\ was
242: 1~year after its X-ray turn-on. This despite the fact that
243: the $\gamma$-ray flare of SGR 1806$-$20
244: was three orders-of-magnitude more luminous
245: than the entire extrapolated X-ray luminosity of \taxp\ from
246: the peak of its turn-on to the present time.
247:
248: For the sake of completeness, we note that at
249: least the kinematic properties of the SGR events
250: are not incompatible with the size of the \taxp\ radio source.
251: If we assume that the radio emitting plasma observed in 2004 January
252: was first ejected from the neutron star a year earlier,
253: then we can place an upper limit on the ejection velocity,
254: $v/c < 0.12\,d_{2.5}$. This is comparable to the velocity directly
255: estimated in the case of SGR 1806$-$20 from its resolved VLA images,
256: $v/c = (0.27\pm0.10)\,d_{15}$ \citep{gae05b}.
257:
258: If the radio emission from \taxp\ is not a transient afterglow,
259: it may be caused by a variable wind of
260: high-energy particles, which we hypothesize could be responsible
261: for powering a small synchrotron emitting nebula under favorable
262: circumstances. The spin-down rates of AXPs fluctuate by a large factor,
263: which is taken as evidence that
264: rotational energy is regularly removed by mechanisms other than dipole
265: braking, e.g., a particle wind \citep*{tho98,har99}.
266: Continued monitoring by \xte\ and \xmm\ shows that the
267: spin-down rate of \taxp\ varies irregularly by at least a factor of 4,
268: with $\dot P = (0.5-2.2) \times 10^{-11}$~s~s$^{-1}$
269: \citep{ibr04,got04b,got05}. Assuming a moment of inertia $I = 10^{45}$
270: g~cm$^2$, this implies the possibility
271: of a wind of luminosity $\dot E = 4\pi^2 I \dot P/P^3 \sim 4 \times 10^{33}$
272: ergs~s$^{-1}$, which is comparable to the quiescent thermal X-ray
273: luminosity \citep{hal05}, and five orders-of-magnitude
274: larger than the radio luminosity $\nu L_{\nu} \approx 5 \times 10^{28}$
275: ergs~s$^{-1}$ at 1.4~GHz.
276: In addition, \xte\ continued to find small X-ray bursts
277: from \taxp\ long after its initial outburst.
278: \citet{woo05} document four such bursts in 2003 September, 2004 February,
279: and 2004 May, from a total exposure time of 9 days.
280: Although these have thermal spectra and blackbody radii much smaller
281: than the surface area of a neutron star, their temperatures of 4--8~keV
282: imply local flux greater than the Eddington value.
283: Whether their initial trigger is magnetic reconnection or crust fracturing,
284: they likely cause matter to be ejected from the surface.
285: The strongest of these bursts had a energy
286: of $3.5 \times 10^{37}\,d_{\rm 2.5}^2$ ergs, and together they
287: emitted $4.2 \times 10^{37}\,d_{\rm 2.5}^2$ ergs. Therefore
288: we can estimate a time-averaged luminosity in bursts of
289: $\dot E \sim 5.4 \times 10^{31}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$, which is two
290: orders-of-magnitude less than the estimated wind luminosity.
291:
292: It is possible that long-lived radio emission is
293: powered by the accumulated plasma ejected in the process
294: of creating the X-ray bursts, as well as by the more luminous wind.
295: Following the arguments of \citet{fra97} and \citet{gae00},
296: the conversion of the ubiquitous pulsar winds to an observable
297: pulsar wind nebula (PWN)
298: may be limited not by the energy carried in the wind,
299: but by the environment -- specifically, by whether the
300: ambient pressure is large enough to shock the wind and confine the
301: nebula. In the case of \taxp, balancing the assumed wind power
302: $\dot E \sim 4 \times 10^{33}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$ at a termination
303: shock radius $r_{\rm w} < 10^{17}$~cm requires a pressure
304: $\dot E/4\pi r_{\rm w}^2c = 1.1 \times 10^{-12}\,(r_{\rm w}/10^{17})^{-2}$ dynes~cm$^{-2}$.
305: This is a rather modest value even if the true radius of the nebula
306: is only $10^{16}$~cm and the pressure is $1 \times 10^{-10}$ dynes~cm$^{-2}$,
307: or alternatively, if the wind power has been 100 times larger than assumed here.
308: In comparison, \citet*{hel01} showed that the radius of the Vela PWN
309: is consistent with the thermal pressure in the surrounding hot
310: supernova remnant, $8.5 \times 10^{-10}$ dynes~cm$^{-2}$
311: measured from X-ray spectroscopy \citep{mar97}. There
312: is no evidence for a supernova remnant surrounding \taxp, which
313: may imply that the surrounding temperature is cooler. If we assume
314: an ionized medium of $T = 10^4$~K, then the required hydrogen density
315: is $n_{\rm H} \sim 0.4 (r_{\rm w}/10^{17})^{-2} (T/10^4)^{-1}$ cm$^{-3}$.
316: The actual development of a PWN is a time-dependent
317: process, with a forward shock radius estimated as
318: $r_{\rm s}(t) = (\dot E/4\pi\rho_0)^{1/5}t^{3/5}$ \citep{aro83}.
319: For the numerical values assumed here, $r_{\rm s} \leq 10^{17}$~cm
320: is reached in $\leq 100$~years.
321: Alternatively, if the pulsar's space velocity $v_{\rm p}$ exceeds
322: $\dot r_{\rm s}$, then a bow-shock nebula will form with apex radius
323: $r_{\rm a} = (\dot E/4\pi\rho_0 v_{\rm p}^2)^{1/2}$ that is smaller
324: than $r_{\rm s}$ for a ``static'' nebula.
325:
326: We note that the radio emitting efficiency of \taxp, as defined by
327: \citet{fra97} and \citet{gae00}, is comparable to the upper limits
328: obtained by them for rotation-powered pulsars of similar $\dot E$
329: as we are assuming for the wind of \taxp. Therefore, evidence is
330: lacking that the average wind power of \taxp\
331: is much greater than its spin-down value. Additionally, there
332: is no X-ray PWN around \taxp, whose image
333: is consistent with a point-source at the \chandra\ resolution of
334: FWHM $\approx 0^{\prime\prime}\!.6$ \citep{isr04}.
335: Only pulsars with $\dot E > 10^{36}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$
336: have X-ray PWNe \citep{got04a}.
337: Perhaps the difference between \taxp\ and other magnetars is that
338: \taxp\ is surrounded by a dense medium, while the past
339: activity of the other, more energetic magnetars, has disrupted and
340: evacuated their surroundings. We note that this is different
341: from the hypothesis advanced by \citet{gae05a} to explain an apparent
342: \ion{H}{1} cavity around AXP 1E~1048.1$-$5937, which they supposed was
343: blown by the wind of its massive progenitor star.
344:
345: \section{Conclusions and Future Work}
346:
347: The detection of radio emission from an AXP
348: comes as a surprise because it is contrary to
349: a defining property of its class. But the physical
350: basis of the classification of \taxp\ is
351: unchanged. The long period, unsteady spin-down,
352: X-ray luminosity exceeding its spin-down power, and detailed
353: properties of its two-component X-ray spectrum, are all squarely in
354: the AXP mold, and support the magnetar interpretation \citep{got05}.
355: Although the radio luminosity of \taxp\ is energetically insignificant,
356: a more detailed investigation of its origin could lead to a better
357: understanding of the evolution of AXPs and their immediate surroundings.
358:
359: The spectral and spatial structure of this compact radio source can
360: be studied with multifrequency observations in the VLA A configuration,
361: which has the potential to resolve the source if it is a PWN powered
362: by a wind of comparable luminosity to the X-ray luminosity
363: or the spin-down power. If size and spectral information are obtained,
364: the particle and magnetic field energies of this presumed synchrotron
365: source can be determined.
366: While the evidence for temporal variability is marginal,
367: variability would not be unexpected, as the X-ray source is still declining
368: from its 2003 January turn-on. A monitoring program can study the
369: relationship, if any, of the radio structure and luminosity to the
370: X-ray history. However, it is possible that the environment
371: and the normal X-ray quiescence of \taxp, rather than its unusual outburst,
372: is what enables it to support a radio source.
373:
374: Having suggested that \taxp\
375: is the prototype of a major subclass of young pulsars that
376: may have been detected but not yet recognized in quiescence \citep{got04b},
377: we now anticipate the prospect of an additional marker,
378: in the form of a compact radio source, that will aid in their discovery.
379:
380: \acknowledgements
381:
382: This work was supported by NASA ADP grant NNG05GC43G to JPH and EVG.
383: RHB and DJH acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation
384: under grants AST-02-6-309 and AST-02-6-55, respectively.
385:
386: \clearpage
387:
388: \begin{thebibliography}{}
389:
390: \bibitem[Arons(1983)]{aro83}Arons, J. 1983, \nat, 302, 301
391:
392: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1994)]{bec94}
393: Becker, R. H., White, R. L., Helfand, D. J., \& Zoonematkermani, S.
394: 1994, \apjs, 91, 347
395:
396: \bibitem[Brogan(2004)]{bro04}Brogan, C. L., Devine, K. E.,
397: Lazio, T. J., Kassim, N. E., Tam, C. R., Brisken, W. F.,
398: Dyer, K. K., \& Roberts, M. S. E. 2004, \aj, 127, 355
399:
400: \bibitem[Cameron et al.(2005)]{cam05}Cameron, P. B., et al.
401: 2005, \nat, 434, 1112
402:
403: \bibitem[Coe et al.(1994)Coe, Jones, \& Lehto]{coe94}
404: Coe, M. J., Jones, L. R., \& Lehto, H. 1994, \mnras, 270, 178
405:
406: \bibitem[Duncan \& Thompson(1992)]{dun92}Duncan, R. C., \&
407: Thompson, C. 1992, \apjl, 392, L9
408:
409: \bibitem[Frail et al.(1999)Frail, Kulkarni, \& Bloom]{fra99}
410: Frail, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., \& Bloom, J. S. 1999, \nat, 398, 127
411:
412: \bibitem[Frail \& Scharringhausen(1997)]{fra97}Frail, D. A., \&
413: Scharringhausen, B. R. 1997, \apj, 480, 364
414:
415: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Brogan(2003)]{gae03}Gaensler, B. M.,
416: \& Brogan, C. L. 2003, Astron. Telegram, 207, 1
417:
418: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(1999)Gaensler, Gotthelf, \& Vasisht]
419: {gae99}Gaensler, B. M., Gotthelf, E. V., \& Vasisht, G. 1999,
420: \apj, 526, L37
421:
422: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2005a)]{gae05a}Gaensler, B. M.,
423: McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Oey, M. S., Haverkorn, M., Dickey,
424: J. M., \& Green, A. J. 2005a, \apjl, 620, L95
425:
426: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2001)]{gae01}Gaensler, B. M., Slane,
427: P. O., Gotthelf, E. V., \& Vasisht, G. 2001, ApJ, 559, 963
428:
429: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2000)]{gae00}Gaensler, B. M., Stappers, W.,
430: Frail, D. A., Moffett, D. A., \& Johnston, S. 2000, \mnras, 318, 58
431:
432: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2005b)]{gae05b}Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2005b,
433: \nat, 434, 1104
434:
435: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2004)]{got04a}Gotthelf, E. V. 2004,
436: in IAU Symp. 218, Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments,
437: ed. F. Camilo \& B. M. Gaensler (San Francisco: ASP), 225
438:
439: \bibitem[Gotthelf \& Halpern(2005)]{got05}Gotthelf, E. V., \&
440: Halpern, J. P. 2005, \apj, 632, 000 (astro-ph/0506511)
441:
442: \bibitem[Gotthelf et al.(2004)]{got04b}Gotthelf, E. V., Halpern, J. P.,
443: Buxton, M., \& Bailyn, C. 2004, \apj, 605, 368
444:
445: \bibitem[Gotthelf \& Vasisht(1998)]{got98}Gotthelf, E. V., \&
446: Vasisht, G. 1998, NewA, 3, 293
447:
448: \bibitem[Halpern \& Gotthelf(2005)]{hal05}Halpern, J. P., \&
449: Gotthelf, E. V. 2005, \apj, 618, 874
450:
451: \bibitem[Harding et al.(1999)Harding, Contopoulos, \& Kazanas]{har99}
452: Harding, A. K., Contopoulos, I., \& Kazanas, D. 1999, \apjl, 525, L125
453:
454: \bibitem[Helfand et al.(2005)Helfand, Becker, \& White]{hel05}
455: Helfand, D. J., Becker, R. H., \& White, R. L. 2005, in preparation
456:
457: \bibitem[Helfand et al.(2001)Helfand, Gotthelf, \& Halpern]{hel01}
458: Helfand, D. J., Gotthelf, E. V., \& Halpern, J. P. 2001, \apj, 556, 380
459:
460: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2005)]{hur05}Hurley, K., et al. 2005, \nat,
461: 434, 1098
462:
463: \bibitem[Ibrahim et al.(2004)]{ibr04} Ibrahim, A. I., et al. 2004,
464: \apjl, 609, L21
465:
466: \bibitem[Israel et al.(2004)]{isr04}Israel, G. L., et al. 2004,
467: \apjl, 603, L97
468:
469: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2002)]{kas02}Kaspi, V. M., Gavriil, F. P.,
470: Woods, P. M., Jensen, J. B., Roberts, M. S. E., \& Chakrabarty, D.
471: 2002, \apjl, 588, L93
472:
473: \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al.(2001)]{kou01}Kouveliotou, C., Tennant, A.,
474: Woods, P. M., Weisskopf, M. C., Hurley, K., Fender, R. P.,
475: Garrington, S. T., Patel, S. K., \& G\"o\u g\"u\c s, E. 2001, \apjl, 558, L47
476:
477: \bibitem[Kriss et al.(1985)]{kri85}Kriss, G. A., Becker, R. H.,
478: Helfand, D. J., \& Canizares, C. R. 1985, \apj, 288, 703
479:
480: \bibitem[Markwardt \& \"Ogelman(1997)]{mar97}Markwardt, C. B., \&
481: \"Ogelman, H. B. 1997, \apj, 480, L13
482:
483: \bibitem[McLaughlin et al.(2003)]{mcl03}McLaughlin, M. A., et al. 2003,
484: \apjl, 591, L135
485:
486: \bibitem[Mereghetti et al.(2002)]{mer02}Mereghetti, S., Chiarlone, L.,
487: Israel, G. L., \& Stella, L. 2002, in Proc. 270th WE-Heraeus Seminar
488: on Neutron Stars, Pulsars, and Supernova Remnants, ed. W. Becker,
489: H. Lesch, \& J. Tr\"umper (MPE Rep. 278; Garching: MPE), 29
490:
491: \bibitem[Palmer et al.(2005)]{pal05}Palmer, D. M., et al. 2005, \nat,
492: 434, 1107
493:
494: \bibitem[Thompson \& Blaes(1998)]{tho98} Thompson, C., \& Blaes, O.
495: 1998, \prd, 57, 3219
496:
497: \bibitem[Torii et al.(1998)]{tor98}Torii, K., Kinugasa, K.,
498: Katayama, K., Tsunemi, H., \& Yamauchi, S. 1998, \apj, 503, 843
499:
500: \bibitem[Vasisht et al.(2000)]{vas00} Vasisht, G., Gotthelf, E. V.,
501: Torii, K., \& Gaensler, B. M. 2000, \apj, 542, L49
502:
503: \bibitem[White et al.(2005)White, Becker, \& Helfand]{whi05}
504: White, R. L., Becker, R. H., \& Helfand, D. J. 2005, \aj, 130, 586
505:
506: \bibitem[Woods et al.(2005)]{woo05}Woods, P. M., Kouveliotou, C.,
507: Gavriil, F. P., Kaspi, V. M., Roberts, M. S. E., Ibrahim, A.,
508: Markwardt, C. B., Swank, J. H., \& Finger, M. H. 2005, \apj, 629, 985
509:
510: \bibitem[Woods \& Thompson(2006)]{woo06}Woods, P. M., \& Thompson, C.
511: 2006, in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin \& M. van der
512: Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), in press (astro-ph/0406133)
513:
514: \bibitem[Zoonematkermani et al.(1990)]{zoo90}Zoonematkermani, S.,
515: Helfand, D. J., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Perley, R. A. 1990,
516: \apjs, 74, 181
517:
518: \end{thebibliography}
519:
520: \clearpage
521:
522: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
523: \tablecolumns{6}
524: \small
525: \tablewidth{0pt}
526: \tablecaption{VLA Observations of \taxp}
527: \tablehead{
528: \colhead{Dates} & \colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Array} & \colhead{Beam FWHM} & \colhead{$F_{\nu}$} & \colhead{References} \\
529: \colhead{} & \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{Configuration}
530: & \colhead{($^{\prime\prime}$)} & \colhead{(mJy)}
531: }
532: \startdata
533: 1983 Dec & 1.42 & B & 6 & $< 5.5$ & 1,2,3 \\
534: 1990 Oct & 4.82 & CnB & 6 & $< 1$ & 1,3,4 \\
535: 2001 Jan -- 2002 Aug & 0.33 & A,B,C,D & 25 & $< 10.5$ & 5,6 \\
536: 2003 Feb & 1.42 & DnC & $62\times35$ & $< 10.5$ & 5,6 \\
537: 2003 Apr & 1.42 & D & 45 & $< 7$ & 1,7 \\
538: 2004 Jan & 1.42 & B & 6 & $4.5\pm0.5$ & 1,7 \\
539: 2004 Mar & 1.42 & C & 15 & $< 3.6$ & 1,7
540: \enddata
541: \tablerefs{(1) This work; (2) Zoonematkermani et al. 1990;
542: (3) White et al. 2005; (4) Becker et al. 1994; (5) Gaensler \& Brogan 2003;
543: (6) Brogan et al. 2004; (7) Helfand et al. 2005.}
544: \tablecomments{Upper limits quoted here are $3\sigma$ based on
545: the rms noise per beam. Uncertainty quoted on the detection is $1\sigma$.}
546: \label{obslog}
547: \end{deluxetable}
548:
549: \clearpage
550:
551: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
552: \tablecolumns{5}
553: \small
554: \tablewidth{0pt}
555: \tablecaption{Imaging Observations of AXPs at 1.4 GHz}
556: \tablehead{
557: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{$F_{\nu}$} & \colhead{$d$} &
558: \colhead{$F_{\nu} d^2$} & \colhead{References} \\
559: \colhead{} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(kpc)} & \colhead{(mJy kpc$^2$)}
560: }
561: \startdata
562: 4U 0142+61 & $< 0.16$ & 3 & $< 1.4$ & 1 \\
563: 1E 1048.1$-$5937 & ... & 2.7 & ... & 2 \\
564: 1RXS J170849.0$-$400910 & $< 1.8$ & 5 & $< 45$ & 1 \\
565: XTE J1810$-$197\tablenotemark{a} & $4.5 \pm 0.5$ & 2.5 & 28 & 3 \\
566: 1E 1841$-$045 & $< 0.36$ & 7 & $< 18$ & 4 \\
567: AX J1844.8$-$0256\tablenotemark{a} & $< 0.5$ & $\sim 8$ & $< 32$ & 3 \\
568: 1E 2259+586 & $< 0.050$ & 3 & $< 0.45$ & 5,6
569: \enddata
570: \tablenotetext{a}{Transient X-ray source.}
571: \tablerefs{(1) Gaensler et al. 2001; (2) Gaensler et al. 2005a;
572: (3) This work; (4) Kriss et al. 1985; (5) Coe et al. 1994;
573: (6) Kaspi et al. 2002.}
574: \tablecomments{Upper limits quoted here are
575: for unpulsed emission at the $3\sigma$ level.}
576: \label{compare}
577: \end{deluxetable}
578:
579: \clearpage
580:
581: \begin{figure}
582: %\centerline{
583: \plotone{f1.eps}
584: %}
585: \caption{MAGPIS VLA image at 1.4 GHz in B configuration of
586: \taxp\ taken in 2004 January. A $9 \sigma$ radio
587: source with flux density $4.5\pm0.5$~mJy is present
588: within $1^{\prime\prime}\!.0$ of the X-ray/IR coordinates.
589: This source is unresolved by the
590: $6^{\prime\prime}$ FWHM beam.}
591: \label{image}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594: \end{document}
595: