1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \raggedright
5:
6: \usepackage{natbib}
7: % \usepackage{latexsym}
8:
9: %\slugcomment{To be submitted to AJ; today is \today}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Contact Binary Variables as X-ray Sources}
12: \shortauthors{Chen et al.}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title {Contact Binary Variables as X-ray Sources }
17:
18: \author{W. P. Chen, Kaushar Sanchawala}
19: \affil{Graduate Institute of Astronomy, National Central University,
20: Chung-Li, Taiwan}
21: \email{wchen@astro.ncu.edu.tw}
22:
23: \and
24:
25: \author{M. C. Chiou}
26: \affil{Department of Physics, National Central University, Chung-Li, Taiwan}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: %
30: We present cross-identification of archived X-ray point sources with
31: W~UMa variable stars found in the All-Sky Automated Survey (ASAS).
32: In a surveyed sky area of 300 square degrees of ASAS, 36 W~UMa stars
33: have been found associated with X-ray emission. We compute the distances
34: of these W~UMa systems and hence their X-ray luminosities.
35: Our data support the "supersaturation" phenomenon seen in these fast rotators,
36: namely that the faster a W~UMa star rotates, the weaker its
37: X-ray luminosity.
38: %
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords{Stars: activity; binaries: close; rotation; X-rays: binaries; stars}
42:
43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
44: \section{W Ursae Majoris Stars in the ASAS Database}
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46:
47: W~Ursae Majoris (W~UMa) variables, also called EW stars, are contact
48: eclipsing binaries of main-sequence component stars with periods
49: $\sim 0.2$--1.4~d. The component stars may have different masses, but
50: fill their Roche lobes to share a common envelope. Apparently because of an
51: efficient convective mechanism to redistribute energy, the details of
52: which are still unknown, both component stars have very similar brightness
53: and chromospheric activity \citep{vil87}. The light curves of W~UMa
54: systems are therefore characterized by two nearly equal minima
55: with virtually no plateau.
56:
57: W~UMa stars are known X-ray emitters. \cite{ste01} examined a sample
58: of some 100 such systems and found about half of them to be X-ray sources.
59: The detailed X-ray emission mechanism in these contact systems remains elusive
60: but is thought to be related to stellar dynamo magnetic activity, arising
61: from a shared convective envelope plus synchronous, fast rotation \citep{gon04}.
62: The X-ray emission of W~UMa stars is known to vary, especially during flares
63: \citep{mcg96}. Interestingly, monitoring of EUV variation of the 44i Bootis W~UMa system
64: by \citet{bri98} shows a period twice as long as that derived from optical light
65: curves. This suggests that the high-energy photons come mainly from one of the
66: binary components, rather than from both. An expanded sample of W~UMa systems
67: with X-ray emission would be an important step to shed light
68: on their X-ray nature, for example on possible correlation with binary
69: evolution \citep{cru84} and with stellar rotation. In this short communication
70: we present our analysis of the X-ray emission of 34 W~UMa stars.
71:
72: Our sample of W~UMa stars was taken from the All-Sky Automated
73: Survey (ASAS) database. The ASAS project\footnote{
74: http://archive.princeton.edu/asas/}, sited at Las Campanas
75: Observatory, started with a prototype ASAS$-$1 and ASAS$-$2 instruments
76: with a $ 768\times 512$ Kodak CCD and 135/f1.8 telephoto lens to monitor
77: stars brighter than I$\sim$~14 magnitudes \citep{poj97, poj00}.
78: From 1997 to 2000, more than 140,000 stars were observed in selected
79: fields covering $\sim 300$ square degrees for nearly 50
80: million photometric measurements. This resulted in discovery of
81: more than 3500 variable stars by ASAS$-$2, among which 380 are periodic
82: variables. The ASAS$-$3 system has been in operation since August
83: 2000, and up to 2002 had discovered over 1000 eclipsing binaries, almost
84: 1000 periodic pulsating variables, and over 1000 irregular stars
85: among the 1,300,000 stars in the RA=0h-6h quarter of the
86: southern sky \citep{poj02}. The ASAS$-$3 database now includes about
87: 4000 entries in the list of contact eclipsing binaries (called EC in the
88: ASAS classification). Light curves for variables identified by
89: ASAS$-$2 are available online without classification of variable types.
90: For these, we inspected 380 periodic variables and identified 36 W~UMa
91: candidates on the basis of their light curves. The ASAS$-$3 database already
92: categorizes variable stars and we took all entries in the EC class as of 2002
93: as our W~UMa sample.
94:
95: We then searched for X-ray counterparts for our sample W~UMa stars in the
96: $ROSAT$ All-Sky Survey database. One should note that the light curves of
97: W~UMa stars resemble those of RRc variables, a subclass of RR\,Lyr stars
98: \citep{hof85}. RRc stars do have a different period range\footnote{Being
99: binary, a W~UMa star would have two minima within a true period, hence with
100: a light curve resembling that of a RRc star of half the peroid.} and
101: are not known to emit X rays. In the course of our study, as byproduct
102: we have identified
103: 2 Cepheids (ASAS\,052020$-$6902.4, ASAS\,234131$+$0126.4),
104: 4 $\beta$\,Lyrae variables (ASAS\,124435$-$6331.7,
105: ASAS\,180253$-$2409.6, ASAS\,104006$-$5155.0, ASAS\,050527$-$6743.2),
106: and 2 Algol-type variables (ASAS\,205603$-$1710.9, ASAS\,144245$-$0039.9)
107: as possible X-ray sources. For ASAS stars, in addition to visual inspection
108: of their light curves, we also analyzed the power spectra by Fourier Transform
109: to get check the periodicity, as a caution of using any database with pipeline
110: analysis and classification. As an illustration, an initial inspection
111: of ASAS\,015647$-$0021.2 suggest
112: a possible identification with a W~UMa or an RRc, with a period of
113: $\sim 0.3511$~d. The power spectrum shows the maximum signal has
114: a period at 0.5427~d instead. Because this variable star has an X-ray
115: counterpart, we conclude it is a W~UMa star.
116:
117: At the end a total of 36 W~UMa stars, 7 in ASAS$-$2
118: and 29 in ASAS$-$3, have been found with possible X-ray counterparts.
119: In \S 2 we present the derivation of the
120: X-ray luminosities of these W~UMa stars. In \S we discuss how their X-ray
121: luminosities correlate with rotational periods.
122:
123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
124: \section{Distance and X-ray Luminosity Determinations}
125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
126:
127: We adopted the calibration scheme by \citet{ruc97b} to compute the absolute
128: magnitude of each W~UMa star and hence its distance; namely,
129:
130: $$M_{\rm V} = -4.42 \, \log P + 3.08 (B-V)_{0} + 0.10, $$
131:
132: where the coefficients are the median values in the analysis of \citet{ruc97b}.
133: Recently \citet{ruc04} refined this period-luminosity-color relation
134: % as $$ M_{\rm V} = -4.44\, \log P + 3.02 (B-V)_{0} + 0.12, $$
135: with minor modifications of the coefficients. The revised relation does not
136: affect our results.
137:
138: % Two of the W~UMa stars with X-ray counterparts have periods or colors
139: % outside the ranges of the calibration, so were excluded from the
140: % final list to compute the I-band absolute magnitudes and distances.
141:
142: The $ROSAT$ All-Sky Survey (RASS) was carried out during 1990--1991 as a part of the
143: $ROSAT$ mnission \citep{tru91}. The survey was conducted in the
144: soft X-ray (0.1--2.4~keV)
145: and in the extreme ultraviolet (0.025--0.2~keV) bands \citep{wel90}. We searched
146: the RASS database for each W~UMa stars in the ASAS catalog to find possible X-ray
147: counterparts within a positional coincidence radius of 30\arcsec. In almost every
148: case, with only two exceptions,
149: the cross-identification is relatively straightforward because either the
150: nominal positions of the X-ray and optical sources match well, or no alternative
151: star seems evident near the X-ray position.
152:
153: Our derivation of the X-ray luminosity followed that of \citet{ste01}.
154: For each X-ray source, the source counts in the hard ($H$; 0.5--2.0~keV) and soft
155: ($S$; 0.1--0.4~keV) bands are retrieved from the database and the hardness ratio
156: $HR=(H-S)/(H+S)$ was computed. The X-ray luminosity for each source then was
157: estimated by multiplying its $ROSAT$ X-ray count by an energy conversion factor,
158: $ECF = (5.3 \, HR + 8.7) 10^{-12}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~cts$^{-1}$ \citep{hun96}.
159:
160: Our X-ray W~UMa stars are listed in Table~\ref{tab:1}. The first columns give
161: the running numbers. The next two columns give the coordinates for each star,
162: followed by its period (taken
163: from ASAS database), and the observed $(B-V)$ color. The V magnitude was taken
164: from the ASAS database and the B magnitude was from SIMBAD, which for our sample,
165: was found typically to be within 0.02~mag of the USNO B magnitude. Columns 6
166: and 7 list respectively the derived distance of the W~UMa star and its X-ray luminosity.
167: The last columns give the known star identification, taken from SIMBAD, with known
168: W~UMa stars marked with "WU".
169: DY~Cet is known to be a W~UMa star from {\it HIPPARCOS} light curve \citep{sel04}.
170: The two sources with the counterparts outside of
171: the 30\arcsec search radius are each
172: labeled with an asterisk.
173: % Of all the entries in Table~\ref{tab:1}
174: % only star No.~1 has been known previously as an X-ray W~UMa star.
175: Three of the brightest stars in our sample have parallax measurements by {\it HIPPARCOS}, with
176: which the inferred distances can be compared. The results are shown in Table~\ref{tab:2}.
177:
178: %Note that
179: %the two "outliers", with periods longer than 0.6~d, are the hottest
180: %stars in our sample.
181:
182: % $$ M_{\rm V} = -4.44\, \log P + 3.02 (B-V)_{0} + 0.12, $$
183:
184: % DY Cet was found to be a W~UMa star from Hipparcos light curve
185: % (Selam, 2004, AA, 416, 1097)
186: % P=0.4408
187: % simbad B=10.4, V=9.8 B-V=0.6, Mv=3.5, d=182 pc
188: % our data B-V=0.93, Mv=4.51, d=114 pc
189: % USNO NOMAD B=9.987, V=9.595, R=9.340, B-V=0.39 --> Mv=2.88, d=220 pc
190:
191: % YY Eri given by Rucinski 1997b, P=0.3215 B-V=0.66 Mv=4.44 +/- 0.14
192: % simbad B=9.05, V=8.41 B-V=0.64
193: % Rucinski relation --> Mv=4.3, d=66 pc
194: % Our data B-V=0.68 --> Mv=4.36, d=64 pc
195:
196: % HN Eri
197: % P=0.6236
198: % Simbad B=8.91, V=8.68 B-V=0.23 --> Mv=1.72, d=247 pc
199: % ours B-V=0.29 --> Mv=1.91, d=226 pc
200:
201:
202: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrl}
203: \tablewidth{0pt}
204: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{.6}
205: %\tabletypesize\footnotesize
206: \tablenum{1}
207: \pagestyle{empty}
208: \tablecaption{Parameters of X-ray W~UMa Stars}
209: \tablehead{
210: \colhead{No.} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{P} & \colhead{(B-V)}
211: & \colhead{Dist.} & \colhead{L$_{\rm X}$} & \colhead{Remarks}\\
212: \colhead{} & \colhead{h~~m~~s} &\colhead{ \arcdeg~~ \arcmin~~ \arcsec}
213: & \colhead{(d)} & \colhead{(mag)}
214: & \colhead{ (pc)} & \colhead{erg\,s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{}
215: }
216: \startdata
217: 1 & 00:14:47 & -39:14:36 & 0.3644 & 0.63 & 389 & 5.49 (30) & UY Scl \\
218: 2 & 00:17:21 & -71:55:00 & 0.5948 & 0.38 & 377 & 2.26 (31) & AQ Tuc \\
219: 3 & 00:23:28 & -20:41:48 & 0.4147 & 0.60 & 185 & 2.45 (30) & HD\,1922 \\
220: 4 & 00:42:40 & -29:56:42 & 0.3017 & 0.77 & 192 & 2.40 (30) & -\\
221: 5 & 01:37:11 & -34:59:18 & 0.4643 & 0.68 & 316 & 4.75 (30) & BV\,917 \\
222: 6 & 01:48:54 & -20:53:36 & 0.3169 & 0.80 & 143 & 1.48 (30) & TW\,Cet \\
223: 7 & 01:56:47 & -00:21.2 & 0.3514 & 0.97 & 384 & 3.96 (30) & \\ %
224: 8 & 02:01:19 & -37:04:54 & 0.3081 & 1.06 & 77 & 7.86 (29) & XZ\,For \\
225: 9 & 02:29:02 & -30:25:48 & 0.3865 & 0.46 & 227 & 1.62 (30) & HD\,15517 \\
226: 10 & 02:38:33 & -14:17:54 & 0.4408 & 0.93 & 107 & 7.29 (29) & DY\,Cet; WU \\
227: 11 & 03:27:36 & -72:50:54 & 0.3099 & 0.76 & 157 & 1.76 (30) & CPD-73\,219 \\
228: 12 & 03:37:02 & -41:31:42 & 0.2923 & 0.81 & 90 & 1.17 (30) & FX\,Eri; WU \\
229: 13 & 03:44:44 & -61:05:48 & 0.2848 & 0.49 & 129 & 2.12 (30) & HD\,23816 \\
230: 14 & 03:48:09 & -58:39:48 & 0.4292 & 0.75 & 209 & 2.27 (30) & - \\
231: 15 & 03:52:00 & -21:55:48 & 0.3352 & 0.52 & 249 & 2.25 (30) & BD-22\,694 \\
232: 16 & 03:58:51 & -51:10:36 & 0.3106 & 0.40 & 154 & 2.57 (30) & CCDM\,J03589-5111AB \\
233: 17 & 04:10:37 & -38:55:42 & 0.4269 & 0.45 & 319 & 3.79 (30) & CD-39\,1360 \\
234: 18 & 04:12:09 & -10:28:12 & 0.3215 & 0.68 & 67 & 1.45 (30) & YY\,Eri; WU \\
235: 19 & 04:21:03 & -26:29:30 & 0.3959 & 0.36 & 259 & 1.57 (30) & CD-26\,1640 \\
236: 20 & 04:25:59 & -21:29:00 & 0.3319 & 0.69 & 199 & 1.40 (30) & AN 626.1935 \\
237: 21 & 04:33:25 & -23:56:18 & 0.6236 & 0.29 & 228 & 8.26 (29) & HN\,Eri \\
238: 22 & 05:05:37 & -57:55:36 & 0.5578 & 0.92 & 339 & 1.88 (31) & [FS2003] 0241 \\
239: 23 & 05:06:17 & -20:07:48 & 0.4486 & 0.57 & 172 & 6.45 (29) & BV\,996 \\
240: 24 & 05:11:14 & -08:33:24 & 0.4234 & 0.64 & 140 & 6.68 (29) & ER\,Ori \\
241: 25 & 05:18:33 & -68:13:32 & 0.2854 & 1.044 & 187 & 1.80 (30) & RW\,Dor; WU \\ % ASAS2
242: 26 & 05:22:14 & -71:56:18 & 0.7766 & 0.33 & 687 & 1.07 (30) & XY\,Men \\
243: 27 & 05:24:52 & -28:09:12 & 0.2758 & 0.64 & 171 & 1.14 (30) & CD-28\,2151 \\
244: 28 & 05:28:32 & -68:36.2 & 0.4474 & 0.789 & 285 & 5.16 (29) & HD\,269602 \\ %ASAS2
245: 29 & 05:39:59 & -68:28:41 & 0.3622 & 0.746 & 296 & 5.18 (29) & HD\,269960; WU \\ %ASAS2
246: 30 & 05:55:01 & -72:41:36 & 0.3438 & 0.77 & 152 & 1.02 (30) & BV\,435 \\
247: 31 & $^{*}$11:47:37 & -63:10.5 & 0.3392 & 1.131 & 257 & 2.24 (30) & - \\
248: 32 & 16:41:21 & +00:30:27 & 0.4533 & 0.654 & 97 & 1.87 (30) & V502\,Oph; WU \\ % ASAS2
249: 33 & 18:41:39 & -00:44.7 & 0.2875 & 0.923 & 205 & 1.26 (30) & - \\ % ASAS2
250: 34 & $^{*}$20:48:59 & 00:27.4 & 0.5134 & 0.664 & 493 & 2.90 (30) \\ % ASAS2
251: 35 & 22:02:48 & -12:18.7 & 0.3067 & 0.873 & 173 & 1.02 (30) & - \\ % ASAS2
252: 36 & 23:24:16 & -62:22:06 & 0.3577 & 0.71 & 136 & 9.68 (29) & BV\,1006 \\
253: \enddata
254: \label{tab:1}
255: \end{deluxetable}
256:
257: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccl}
258: \tablewidth{0pt}
259: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{.6}
260: %\tabletypesize\footnotesize
261: \tablenum{1}
262: \pagestyle{empty}
263: \tablecaption{Comparison of Distance Determinations }
264: \tablehead{
265: \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{Dist.$_{\rm W UMa}$ } &
266: \colhead{$\pi$ ($\sigma_{\pi}$)} &\colhead{ Dist.$_{\it HIPPARCOS}$ }
267: & \colhead{ID }
268: }
269: \startdata
270: 02:38:33 & -14:17:54 & 107 & 3.82 (2.17) & 262 (167--606) & DY~Cet; HD\,16515 \\
271: 04:12:09 & -10:28:12 & 67 & 17.96 (1.2) & 56 (52--60) & YY~Eri; HD\,26609 \\
272: 04:33:25 & -23:56:18 & 228 & 2.21 (1.13) & 452 (299--926) & HN~Eri; HD\,29053\\
273: \enddata
274: \label{tab:2}
275: \end{deluxetable}
276:
277:
278:
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280: \section{X-ray Activity and Rotation}
281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
282:
283: The X-ray luminosity is known to increase with rotation in late-type field
284: and cluster dwarfs \citep{piz03, pal81}, which is attributed to
285: their enhanced dynamo magnetic activity. The trend holds until the rotation
286: is faster than the period $P \leq 1$~d (Fig.~\ref{fig:plx}) at which saturation occurs.
287:
288: The W~UMa stars are tidally locked fast rotators, with the majority of
289: periods shorter than 0.63~d. Because of their nearly edge-on orbital
290: orientation, W~UMa stars offer a good chance
291: to investigate the relationship between rotation and magnetism, not only
292: in a contact binary environment, but in a fast rotating system in general.
293: The X-ray luminosities of the W~UMa stars in our sample (Table~\ref{tab:1}) range from
294: $ 4.37 \times 10^{29}$ to $2.26 \times 10^{31}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
295:
296: It has been an unsettled issue whether the X-ray luminosity $L_{x}$ or
297: its ratio to the total stellar luminosity $L_{\rm X} / L_{bol}$ should be
298: used as a measure of stellar X-ray activity. The X-ray luminosity is directly
299: proportional to the emitting volume, whatever the radiation mechanism,
300: whereas the ratio compares the X-ray with photospheric emission.
301: The situation is particularly unclear for W~UMa stars for which
302: two stars share a single common envelope. Likewise, different parameters have
303: been used in the literature to quantify stellar rotation, e.g.,
304: the rotational period, equatorial speed ($ v \sin i$), or the Rossby number.
305: Fig.~\ref{fig:plx} plots the $L_{\rm X}$ versus period for W~UMa stars in our
306: sample, together with those in \citet{ste01} and \citet{mcg96}.
307: One sees that the addition of our sample reinforces
308: the notion that, for a rotational period shorter than $\sim 0.5$~d),
309: the faster a W~UMa star rotates, the weaker
310: its X-ray emission. Such "supersaturation" has been
311: suggested already in early study of W~UMa stars by {\it Einstein Observatory}
312: \citep{cru84}, and lately discussed by \citet{ste01}.
313: A similar anti-correlation between the X-ray luminosity
314: and rotation might also exist for single stars with rotation faster
315: than a saturation value ($\la 1$~d, \citet{piz03};
316: $v \sin i \ga 100$~km~s$^{-1}$, \citet{pro96}).
317:
318: Fig.~\ref{fig:bv} plots the the {\it observed} $(B-V)$ color
319: versus the period of our sample stars. In general the reddening
320: $E(B-V)$ is small for a nearby ~W~UMa star \citep{ruc97b}, as is the case
321: for stars in our study. Assuming the observed $(B-V)$ is close to
322: the dereddened $(B-V)_{0}$, Fig.~\ref{fig:bv} resembles that shown
323: by \citet{ruc97b}, so one cannot rule out the apparent (anti)correlation
324: between X-ray luminosity and rotational period via the dependence
325: of both quantities on the color. The dependence of $L_{x}$ on
326: $(B-V)$, however, is weak and scattered.
327:
328: In summary, we have identified 36 stars in the ASAS variable star
329: database which are also X-ray sources. Our sample substantially expands
330: the list of known W~UMa stars as fast rotators which show supersaturation
331: phenomenon, in the sense of decreasing X-ray luminosity as
332: the rotation gets faster.
333:
334: \acknowledgments
335: We thank Bahdan Paczinski for bringing up our attention to the issue of
336: variable stars as X-ray sources.
337: We also acknowledge Ron Taam for useful discussions. This research is partially
338: supported by the grant NSC94-2112-M-008-017 of National Science Council.
339:
340: % The time scales of merging of the binary components in a W~UMa system
341: % is short, some half billion years \citep{dry02}, compared to
342:
343:
344: \begin{figure}
345: \plotone{f1.eps}
346: \caption{X-ray luminosity versus rotational period for W~UMa stars.
347: The solid circles are data from this work (Table~1). Crosses
348: are data taken from \citet{ste01} and squares are data taken from
349: \citet{mcg96}.
350: }
351: \label{fig:plx}
352: \end{figure}
353:
354: \begin{figure}
355: \plottwo{f2.a.eps}{f2.b.eps}
356: \caption{(Left) The observed (B-V) color versus period and (right)
357: the $L_{\rm X}$ versus $(B-V)$ for our sample stars.
358: }
359: \label{fig:bv}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362:
363:
364: % Fig. 5 X-ray luminosity vs. rotation of field dwarfs (crosses) and
365: % cluster stars (squares). Leftward arrows indicate field stars with periods
366: % derived from {\it v sini} data, taken from \cite{piz03}.
367:
368: %---------------------References-------------------------------
369:
370: \begin{thebibliography}{}
371:
372: % \bibitem[Bailyn et al.(1989)]{bailyn89}
373: % Bailyn, C.D., Grindlay, J.E., Cohn, H. Lugger, P.H., Stetson,
374:
375: \bibitem[Brickhouse \& Dupree (1998)]{bri98}
376: Brickhouse, N. S., \& Dupree, A. K., 1998, \apj, 502, 918
377: % Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer Observations of the W Ursa Majoris Contact Binary
378: % 44i Bootis: Coronal Structure and Variability
379:
380: \bibitem[Cruddace \& Dupree(1984)]{cru84}
381: Cruddace, R. G., \& Dupree, A. K., 1984, \apj, 277, 263
382: % contact binary stars: I an X-ray survey
383:
384: \bibitem[Dryomova \& Svechnikov(2002)]{dry02}
385: Dryomova, G. N, \& Svechnikov, M. A., 2002, Astrophy., 45, 158
386: % time scale of merging of components of contact binaries of the W UMa type
387:
388: \bibitem[Gondoin(2004)]{gon04}
389: Gondoin, P., 2004, \aap, 415, 1113
390: % X-ray spectroscopy of the W UMa-type binary VW Cephei
391:
392: \bibitem[Hoffmeister, Richter, \& Wenzel (1985)]{hof85}
393: Hoffmeister, C., Richter, G., \& Wenzel, W., 1985, {\it Variable Stars}, Springer-Verlag
394:
395: \bibitem[H\"{u}nsch et al. (1996)]{hun96}
396: H\"{u}ensch, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Schr\"{o}eder, K.-P., \& Reimers, D., 1996, \aap, 310, 801
397: % ROSAT X-ray observations of a complete, volume-limited sample of late-type giants
398:
399: \bibitem[McGale et al.(1996)]{mcg96}
400: McGale, P. A., Pye, J. P., \& Hodgkin, S. T., 1996, \mnras, 280, 627
401: % ROSAT PSPC X-ray spectral survey of W UMa systems
402:
403: \bibitem[Pallavin et al.(1981)]{pal81}
404: Pallavicini, R., Golub, L., Rosner, R., Vaiana, G. S., Ayres, T., \& Linsky, J. L., 1981, \apj, 248, 279,
405: % Relations among stellar X-ray emission observed from Einstein, stellar rotation and bolometric luminosity
406:
407: \bibitem[Perryman et al. (1997)]{per97}
408: Perryman, M. A. C., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J., Hoeg, E., Bastian, U., Bernacca, P. L.,
409: Creze, M., Donati, F., Grenon, M., van Leeuwen, F., van der Marel, H., Mignard, F., Murray, C. A.,
410: Le Poole, R. S., Schrijver, H., Turon, C., Arenou, F., Froeschle, M., Petersen, C. S.
411: 1997, \aap, 323, L49
412: % Hipparcos catalog
413:
414: \bibitem[Pojmanski(1997)]{poj97}
415: Pojmanski, G., 1997, Acta Astronomica, 47,467
416:
417: \bibitem[Pojmanski(2000)]{poj00}
418: Pojmanski, G., 2000, Acta Astronomica 50, 177
419:
420: \bibitem[Pojmanski(2002)]{poj02}
421: Pojmanski, G., 2002, Acta Astronomica 52, 397
422:
423: \bibitem[Pizzolato et al.(2003)]{piz03}
424: Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., \& Ventura, P., 2003, \aap, 397, 147
425: % stellar activity-rot relationship revised: dependence of saturation and non-saturated x-ray emission
426: % regimes on stellar mass for late-type dwarfs
427:
428: \bibitem[Prosser et al.(1996)]{pro96}
429: Prosser, C. F., Randich, S., Stauffer, J. R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Simon, T., 1996,
430: \aj, 112, 1570
431: % ROSAT Pointed Observations of the Alpha Persei Cluster
432:
433: \bibitem[Rucinski(1994)]{ruc94}
434: Rucinski, S., 1994, \pasp, 106,462
435:
436: \bibitem[Rucinski(1997)]{ruc97a}
437: Rucinski, S., 1997, \aj, 113,407
438:
439: \bibitem[Rucinski(2004)]{ruc04}
440: Rucinski, S., 2004, New Astron. Rev., 48, 703
441: % distance tracers
442:
443: \bibitem[Rucinski \& Duerbeck (1997)]{ruc97b}
444: Rucinski, S., M., \& Duerbeck, H. W., 1997, \pasp, 109, 1340
445: % absolute magnitude calibration for the WUMa-type systems
446: % based on HIPPARCOS data
447:
448: \bibitem[Selam (2004)]{sel04}
449: Selam, S. O., 2004, \aap, 416, 1097
450: % Key parameters of W UMa-type contact binaries discovered by HIPPARCOS
451:
452: \bibitem[Stassun et al. (2004)]{sta04}
453: Stassun, K. G., Ardila, D. R., Barsony, M., Basri, G., Mathieu, R. D.,
454: 2004, \aj, 127, 3537
455: % X-Ray Properties of Pre-Main-Sequence Stars in the Orion Nebula Cluster with
456: % Known Rotation Periods
457:
458: \bibitem[St\c{e}pie\'{n} et al.(2001)]{ste01}
459: St\c{e}pie\'{n}, K. et al., 2001, \aap, 370,157
460:
461: \bibitem[Truemper et al.(1991)]{tru91}
462: Truemper, J., Hasinger, G., Aschenbach, B., Braeuninger, H., \& Briel, U. G,
463: 1991, \nat, 349, 579
464:
465: \bibitem[Vilhu \& Walter (1987)]{vil87}
466: Vilhu, O., \& Walter, F. M., 1987, \apj, 321, 958
467: % Chromospheric-coronal activity at saturated levels
468:
469: \bibitem[Wells et al. (1990)]{wel90}
470: Wells, A., Abbey, A. F., Barstow, M. A., Cole, R. E., Pye, J. P., Sims, M. R., Spragg, J. E.,
471: Watson, D. J., Willingale, R., \& Courtier, G. M., 1990, SPIE, 1344, 230
472: % First in-orbit measurements with the ROSAT XUV wide field camera
473:
474: %
475: \end{thebibliography}
476:
477: \acknowledgments
478:
479: \end{document}
480: