1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
3: %\usepackage{lscape}
4: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{apjfonts}
7:
8:
9: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ, 20 Dec 2005, vol 635 issue}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{The First Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Observations of
14: the Galactic Center: Sgr A*'s Infrared Color and the Extended Red
15: Emission in its Vicinity}
16:
17: \author{
18: A. M. Ghez\altaffilmark{1,2},
19: S. D. Hornstein\altaffilmark{1},
20: J.Lu\altaffilmark{1},
21: A. Bouchez\altaffilmark{3},
22: D. Le Mignant\altaffilmark{3},
23: M. A. van Dam\altaffilmark{3},
24: P. Wizinowich\altaffilmark{3},
25: K. Matthews\altaffilmark{4},
26: M. Morris\altaffilmark{1},
27: E. E. Becklin\altaffilmark{1},
28: R. D. Campbell\altaffilmark{3},
29: J. C. Y. Chin\altaffilmark{3},
30: S. K. Hartman\altaffilmark{3},
31: E. M. Johansson\altaffilmark{3},
32: R. E. Lafon\altaffilmark{3},
33: P. J. Stomski\altaffilmark{3},
34: D. M. Summers\altaffilmark{3}
35: }
36:
37: %\email{ghez, seth, jlu, morris, becklin@astro.ucla.edu}
38:
39: \altaffiltext{1}{Division of Astronomy and Astrophysics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547; ghez, seth, jlu, morris, becklin@astro.ucla.edu}
40: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, UCLA,
41: Los Angeles, CA 90095-1565}
42: \altaffiltext{3}{W. M. Keck Observatory, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Hwy, Kamuela, HI 9674
43: 3; abouchez, davidl, peterw, rcampbell, jchin, mvandam, shartman, erikj,
44: rlafon, pstomski, dsummers@keck.hawaii.edu}
45: \altaffiltext{4}{Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of
46: Technology, MS 320-47, Pasadena, CA 91125; kym@caltech.edu}
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: We present the first Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics
51: (LGS-AO) observations of the Galactic center.
52: LGS-AO has dramatically improved the quality and robustness with
53: which high angular resolution infrared images of the Galactic center
54: can be obtained with the W. M. Keck II 10-meter telescope.
55: Specifically, Strehl ratios of
56: 0.7 and 0.3 at L'[3.8 $\mu m$] and K'[2.1 $\mu$m], respectively,
57: are achieved in these LGS-AO images; these
58: are at least a factor of two higher
59: and a factor of four to five more stable against
60: atmospheric fluctuations than the Strehl ratios delivered
61: thus far with the Keck
62: Natural Guide Star AO system on the Galactic center.
63: Furthermore, these observations
64: are the first that cover a large area ($76\arcsec \times 76\arcsec$)
65: surrounding the central black hole at diffraction-limited resolution
66: for an 8-10 meter class telescope.
67: During our observations, the infrared counterpart to the
68: central supermassive black hole, Sgr A*-IR, showed significant infrared
69: intensity variations,
70: with observed L' magnitudes ranging from 12.6 to 14.5 mag and
71: a decrease in flux density of a factor of two over an 8 minute interval.
72: The faintest end of our L' detections, 1.3 mJy (dereddened), is the lowest
73: level of emission yet observed for this source by a factor of 3.
74: No significant variation in the location of SgrA*-IR is detected
75: as a function of either wavelength or intensity. Previous claims
76: of such positional variations are easily attributable to
77: a nearby (0\farcs 09 or 720 AU, projected),
78: extended, very red source, which we suggest arises
79: from a locally heated dust feature.
80: Near a peak in its intensity, we obtained the first measurement of
81: SgrA*-IR's K'-L' color; its K'-L' of
82: 3.0 $\pm$ 0.2 mag (observed) or 1.4 $\pm$ 0.2 (dereddened)
83: corresponds to an intrinsic spectral index of $\alpha$ -0.5 $\pm$ 0.3 for
84: F$_{\nu} \sim \nu^{\alpha}$. This is significantly bluer than other recent
85: infrared measurements from the literature, which suggest $\alpha$ = -4 $\pm$ 1.
86: Because our measurement was taken
87: at a time when Sgr A* was $\sim$6 times brighter in the infrared than
88: the other measurements, we posit that the spectral index of
89: the emission arising from the vicinity of our Galaxy's
90: central black hole may depend on the strength of the flare, with stronger
91: flares giving rise to a higher fraction of high energy electrons in the
92: emitting region.
93:
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \keywords{black hole physics -- Galaxy:center ---
97: infrared:stars -- techniques:high angular resolution}
98:
99:
100: \section{INTRODUCTION}
101:
102: High angular resolution infrared observations have had a large impact
103: on our understanding of the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.
104: Application of speckle imaging techniques generated the first
105: high angular resolution (0\farcs 05 - 0\farcs 1)
106: images and demonstrated the existence of a
107: supermassive ($\sim3.7 \times 10^6 M_{\odot}$) black hole
108: through measurements of orbital motion in the plane of the sky for
109: stars within the central few arcseconds of our Galaxy
110: (e.g., Eckart \& Genzel 1997; Ghez et al. 1998, 2000,
111: 2003, 2005; Genzel et al. 2000; Eckart et al. 2002;
112: Sch\"odel et al. 2002, 2003).
113: While these speckle imaging experiments resulted
114: in the most convincing case of a supermassive black hole
115: at the center of any normal type galaxy, the application
116: of this technique to the Galactic center has been limited
117: primarily to proper motion measurements at a single wavelength.
118: The advent of Adaptive Optics (AO) systems that are based on natural guide stars
119: (NGS) allowed spectroscopy with sufficient angular and spectral resolution
120: to detect weak absorption lines in individual stars orbiting in close
121: proximity to the central black hole. These observations revealed that
122: luminous stars located no more than 2000 AU from the central black hole
123: are OB stars, which are thought to be less than 10 Myrs old
124: and which therefore raise the interesting question of how
125: apparently young stars form in a region that is inhospitable to star
126: formation (Ghez et al. 2003). These observations, in concert
127: with the proper motion measurements, also provided a
128: direct measurement of the distance to the Galactic center
129: (Eisenhauer et al. 2003). NGS-AO systems also increased the
130: efficiency and depth of high angular resolution observations; this
131: led to the discovery of an infrared counterpart to
132: the central black hole, Sgr A*-IR
133: (Genzel et al. 2003a; Ghez et al. 2004) and permitted
134: detailed studies of the stellar number density distribution,
135: which suggested the existence of central stellar cusp (Genzel et al.
136: 2003b). While NGS-AO has greatly enhanced the versatility of
137: high angular resolution observations of the Galactic center,
138: the quality of NGS-AO observations degrades rapidly both with distance
139: from the NGS and with dimness of the NGS.
140:
141: In this paper, we present the first Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics
142: (LGS-AO) observations of the Galactic center. LGS-AO has dramatically
143: improved the quality and robustness with which
144: high angular resolution images can be obtained with the
145: W. M. Keck II 10-meter telescope, revealing new features in the
146: infrared emission coincident with and surrounding the central black hole,
147: clear short timescale variations in the infrared emission arising
148: from just outside the black hole, and the first measurement of SgrA*-IR's
149: K'-L' color.
150: Furthermore, these observations are the first that can cover a large area
151: surrounding the central black hole at diffraction-limited resolution.
152: These measurements represent an exciting next step in our understanding
153: of the central black hole and its surrounding as well as in our
154: technical ability to obtain high angular resolution data.
155:
156:
157: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
158:
159: Images of the Galactic center
160: were obtained on 2004 July 26 (UT) with the W. M. Keck II 10-meter
161: telescope using the new facility Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics
162: system (Wizinowich et al., in prep; van Dam et al., in prep) and the
163: near-infrared
164: camera, NIRC2 (Matthews, in prep). During these observations,
165: an artificial guide star was
166: generated with a pulsed dye laser, which was tuned to the Na D atomic
167: transition (589 nm) and which was run at 14 W output power.
168: At the beginning of the night, the size of the LGS, imaged at zenith with the
169: whole telescope pupil, was measured to be 1".3 x 2".1, elongated due to the
170: finite thickness of the sodium layer. The size of the LGS across the
171: wavefront sensor varied from 1".2 x 1".4 close to the location of the LGS
172: launch telescope to 1".5 x 3".1 for the spots furthest from launch
173: telescope. Although the intrinsic LGS spot size increases with increasing
174: airmass due to additional turbulence on its upward and downward trajectory,
175: the spot elongation decreases, since the LGS at a larger distance from the
176: telescope. Over the course of our observations,
177: the LGS brightness was equivalent to
178: an V magnitude of 11.4 star and it varied by only 5\% (1$\sigma$).
179: For all the observations reported here,
180: the LGS's position was always locked to the center of the
181: NIRC2 field of view.
182: %by exciting Na atoms in the upper part of the Earth's mesosphere ($\sim$
183: %90 km altitude) with a 10-15 W pulsed Nd:Yag laser tuned to the Na D atomic
184: %transition (589 nm).
185: While observations of the artificial guide star provide the necessary
186: information to correct most of the important atmospheric aberrations,
187: it does not provide information on the tip-tilt term, which, for these observations,
188: was obtained from visible observations of USNO 0600-28577051
189: (R = 13.7 mag and $\Delta r_{SgrA*}$ = 19$\arcsec$).
190: The science instrument houses
191: a 1024$\times$1024 InSb array, which has pixel scales of
192: 9.93 and 39.9 milli-arcsec per pixel
193: and corresponding field of view of
194: 10\farcs 2$\times$10\farcs 2 and 40\farcs 8$\times$40\farcs 8,
195: respectively. All observations were made using correlated double sampling readout
196: of the array, which produced an RMS readout noise of 77 electrons.
197: With the LGS-AO/NIRC2 setup,
198: two sets of eight 30 sec narrow-field images, each composed of 120 coadded
199: 0.25 sec
200: exposures, were obtained through the
201: L'($\lambda_o$=3.78 $\mu$m, $\Delta \lambda$=0.70 $\mu$m) photometric bandpass;
202: each set of eight images was composed of four pairs of images centered
203: at the corners of a 0\farcs 5 $\times$ 0\farcs 5 box.
204: An additional twelve 9 sec
205: K'($\lambda$=2.12 $\mu$m, $\Delta \lambda$=0.35 $\mu$m)
206: narrow-field images, each composed of 50 coadded 0.181 sec exposures, were
207: collected.
208: In the wide field-of-view mode,
209: two sets of
210: five 25 sec (100 coadded 0.25 exposures) narrow bandpass filter
211: (set 1 [He-I filter]: $\lambda_o$ = 2.06 $\mu$m, $\Delta \lambda$ = 0.03 $\mu$m
212: and
213: set 2 [narrow band continuum filter]: $\lambda_o$ = 2.27 $\mu$m, $\Delta \lambda$ = 0.03 $\mu$m)
214: images, dithered by 18$\arcsec$ to create a $76\arcsec \times 76\arcsec$
215: field-of-view, were also obtained.
216: A similar sequence on a relatively dark portion of the sky was
217: observed both before and after the Galactic center observations
218: to measure the background emission.
219:
220: The operational efficiency of the LGS-AO system
221: was quite high. Before these observations could begin,
222: roughly 5 min were required to acquire the tip-tilt star and
223: propagate the laser. After this initial set-up time,
224: the only other overhead introduced by the LGS-AO system
225: was an additional $\sim$20 sec with each dither to move the
226: laser to the new field center. Wizinowich et al. (2005, in prep)
227: provide further details on the science observing efficiency for
228: the LGS-AO system in all its possible observing modes.
229:
230: During these measurements, the uncorrected 2 $\mu$m seeing disk size
231: for observations of the Galactic center was $\sim$0\farcs 5, which is
232: close to the median value of 0\farcs 4 for the Keck telescopes.
233: On-axis K' LGS-AO observations of the tip-tilt star, which were taken just
234: before the observations centered on Sgr A* at an airmass (AM) of 1.53,
235: yielded a point spread function
236: with a Strehl ratio of 0.422 and a FWHM of 52.3 mas. Compared
237: to the LGS-AO performance for observations centered on SgrA*, which
238: yield an average K' Strehl ratio of 0.31 (see \S4 for detailed
239: description of LGS-AO performance), this implies an atmospheric isokinetic
240: angle\footnote{The isokinetic angle, $\theta_{TA}$, is the
241: characteristic angular offset at which the RMS wavefront error
242: due to tilt decorrelation ($\sigma_{TA}$) is 1 radian
243: (${\sigma_{TA}}^2 = (\theta / \theta_{TA})^2$, where $\theta$ is the
244: distance from the tip-tilt star; Hardy 1998).}
245: of $34\arcsec (1.53/AM)^{1.5}$ for these observations and
246: 64\arcsec for observations at zenith.
247:
248: \input{tab1.tex}
249:
250: \section{DATA ANALYSIS}
251:
252: The standard image reduction steps of background subtraction, flat fielding,
253: bad pixel repair, and optical distortion correction were carried out on each
254: image. Since the background in the L' images is dominated by the
255: thermal emission from the AO system, the best background subtraction
256: was achieved by subtracting from each image the average of
257: sky images that were taken with as similar a rotator angle
258: as possible.
259: %Differences in the rotator angle between the
260: %images of the Galactic center and the sky leave a low
261: %level mottled structure in the images on scales of about 1\farcs.
262: The optical distortion corrections applied were taken from
263: the NIRC2 pre-ship review results
264: (http://alamoana.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/nirc2/) and are relatively small
265: for the narrow field of view camera. The pre-ship review results do
266: not adequately describe the optical distortions in the wide field
267: of view camera. We therefore restrict our analysis of the wide field
268: data set to the small region around SgrA*-IR and will report the
269: results of our search for stars with He-I line features, which
270: are more sensitive to these field variations, elsewhere (Lu et al.,
271: in prep.)
272:
273: Point sources were identified and characterized in both
274: the individual images and in an average of all the images
275: by running them through the point spread function (PSF) fitting
276: program, StarFinder (Diolaiti et al. 2000). This
277: generated an estimate of each image's PSF based on the
278: several bright point sources (IRS 16C, 16NW, 29N, 16NE, and 33E for the K'
279: images and IRS 16C, 16NW, and 29NE in the L' images)
280: and relative flux densities for all sources that
281: were identified. Using the apparent magnitudes measured
282: by Blum et al. 1996 at K and Wright et al. (in prep) at L'
283: for IRS 16NE (K=9.00, L'=7.37 mag),
284: IRS 16NW (K=10.03, L'=8.43 mag), and IRS 16C (K=9.83, L'=8.14 mag),
285: we derived apparent magnitudes for all the sources
286: detected with StarFinder and estimated the uncertainties in the calibration
287: to be $\sim$4\% and 5\% for the K' and L' observations, respectively\footnote
288: {The formal uncertainty for the K' absolute magnitudes is only 2\%,
289: but we increase it to 4\% to accommodate the differences between the
290: K and K' filters. Nonetheless, our final reported uncertainties are
291: dominated by the relative flux measurements as opposed to this
292: absolute calibration uncertainty.}.
293: The apparent magnitudes were de-reddened
294: assuming a visual extinction of 29 $\pm$ 1 mag from Wright et al.
295: (in prep) and an extinction law derived by Moneti et al. (2001),
296: and then converted to flux densities with zero points
297: from Tokunaga 2000 (see Table~\ref{tab_sum}'s footnotes for values).
298:
299: Extra steps were taken with StarFinder to ensure that SgrA*-IR, which
300: is located in a very crowded region, was accurately measured in
301: the individual short exposure frames.
302: First, StarFinder was run using a detection threshold of 0.6 for the
303: correlation between a source and the PSF. Second, StarFinder was run
304: in a mode in which it fits only sources from an input list. Our list
305: included all sources detected from the first step along with
306: any source within 0\farcs 15 of the dynamical center that
307: was detected in the average map at that wavelength,
308: but was missed in the first step for that individual short exposure
309: \footnote{The following sources within the central 0\farcs 15 were missed
310: in the first step:
311: SgrA*-IR in 5 K' and 8 L' maps,
312: S0-17 in 1 K' and 4 L' maps, and S0-20 in 1 K' and 4 L' maps.}.
313: Since
314: StarFinder's PSF fitting routine is very sensitive to local
315: confusion, these added sources, if overlooked, can affect the
316: resulting photometry.
317: Since Frame 82 had an anomalously poor-quality PSF and StarFinder failed to
318: identify any of the sources within 0\farcs 1 of SgrA*-IR in this first step, it was
319: dropped from any further analysis.
320: The second step recovered all the missing detections of these central
321: sources except for SgrA*-IR in 3 K' maps and S0-20 in one L' map.
322: The consecutive images \#113 and 114 with no detections of SgrA*-IR
323: were averaged together
324: and analyzed as described above, but still led to a non-detection of SgrA*-IR.
325:
326: Uncertainties in SgrA*-IR's photometry
327: were estimated from the flux density fluctuations between the maps
328: for stars that are detected in at least 75\% of the maps. Since
329: the stars are not variable on the timescale of this experiment
330: and the image quality is fairly constant
331: across the maps, the rms of these stars' flux densities provide an
332: estimate of the
333: measurement uncertainty as a function of flux density.
334: We therefore set the uncertainty in a given SgrA*-IR flux density
335: measurement equal to the average rms of stars whose flux density differs by
336: no more than 1 mJy from that measurement of SgrA*-IR.
337: Between
338: 10 and 75 stars contribute to most of these uncertainty estimates, depending
339: on the brightness of SgrA*-IR.
340:
341: For the two K' maps without detections of SgrA*-IR
342: (\#83 and the average of \#113 and 114), upper limits on SgrA*-IR's
343: flux density
344: are derived from aperture photometry.
345: In order to remove the effects of nearby stars in such a crowded region,
346: we subtracted, from the original map, the model created by StarFinder
347: of all the detected point sources,
348: with the exception of
349: two sources at r$>$0\farcs 1 that served as photometric reference
350: sources (S0-19 \& S0-8; see Table~\ref{tab_srcs}).
351: Aperture photometry was then conducted on this difference map,
352: using an aperture radius of $\sim$0\farcs 06
353: and a surrounding sky annulus of width $\sim$0\farcs 03,
354: at the locations of SgrA*-IR, the reference sources, and a few background
355: locations near SgrA*-IR. These were combined to generate 3$\sigma$
356: detection limits. A similar analysis was carried out on the two wide-field
357: maps that contained SgrA*-IR.
358:
359:
360: \begin{figure*}
361: \epsscale{1.0}
362: \plotone{f1.eps}
363: \figcaption{
364: A comparison of the first LGS-AO image (left) and the best NGS-AO image
365: (right)
366: taken with the W. M. Keck II 10 m telescope (2002-2004)
367: in the L'(3.8 $\mu$m) photometric bandpass of the
368: central 7\farcs5$\times$7\farcs5 of our Galaxy. In both images, the cross denotes the location
369: of the central supermassive black hole and the orientation is North up
370: and East to the left. The LGS-AO image
371: has a Strehl ratio that is a factor of two higher than
372: that obtained in the NGS-AO image; furthermore, the LGS-AO image resulted from
373: an exposure time of only 8 min, a factor of $\sim$ 20 less than the
374: comparison NGS-AO image. The LGS-AO system has therefore
375: dramatically improved the image quality that can be obtained
376: on the Galactic center with the Keck telescope.
377: \label{lgs_img}
378: }
379: \end{figure*}
380:
381: \begin{figure*}
382: \epsscale{1.0}
383: \plotone{f2.eps}
384: \figcaption{
385: A $76\arcsec \times 76\arcsec$ diffraction-limited 2 $\mu$m
386: mosaic of the Galactic center obtained with five pointings
387: of the LGS-AO system. This is the widest near-infrared field
388: imaged yet at this angular resolution.
389: }
390: \end{figure*}
391:
392:
393: \input{tab2.tex}
394:
395: \begin{figure}
396: \epsscale{1.0}
397: \plotone{f3.eps}
398: \figcaption{
399: The central $1\arcsec \times 1\arcsec$ region of the average of all the
400: K' (left) and L' (right) LGS-AO images.
401: The position of Sgr A*-IR is marked with a white cross and
402: the labeled sources are those that are either within 0\farcs 15 of the
403: dynamical center (Extended Red Emission, S0-17, S0-2, and S0-20)
404: or that were used to establish upper limits for detection (S0-19 and S0-8).
405: The contour image is what remains after all subtracting out all identified
406: point sources, leaving primarily just the emission from
407: the extended source. North is up and East is to the left.
408: \label{extended}
409: }
410: \end{figure}
411:
412:
413:
414:
415: \section{LGS-AO PERFORMANCE}
416:
417: The laser guide star adaptive optics system has
418: dramatically improved the versatility, image quality,
419: and robustness of adaptive optics observations of the
420: Galactic center. Based on the PSFs estimated from StarFinder (see \S3),
421: the images all have consistently high
422: Strehl ratios, 0.68 $\pm$ 0.04 for the L'(3.8 $\mu$m)-band
423: images and 0.31 $\pm$ 0.06 for the K'(2.1 $\mu$m)-band images,
424: %(see Table~\ref{tab_sum} for the
425: %individual values)
426: as well as PSF full width at half maxima (FWHM) that are also
427: all consistently very nearly diffraction-limited;
428: at L' the FWHM is 80.6 $\pm$ 0.7 mas
429: %(78 mas),
430: and at K' the FWHM is 63 $\pm$ 8 mas.
431: % (45 mas)
432: Using the extended Mar\'echal approximation that $S = e^{-(2 \pi \sigma_{wf} / \lambda )^2}$,
433: where $S$ is the Strehl ratio, $\sigma_{wf}$ is the RMS wavefront error
434: and $\lambda$ is the observing wavelength, we find an average
435: RMS wavefront error of 371 $\pm$ 30 nm for these observations.
436: Compared to the Keck natural guide star adaptive optics system (NGS-AO),
437: the LGS-AO system can observe the Galactic center under
438: much poorer atmospheric conditions and delivers L' images that have,
439: on average, a factor of 2 higher Strehl ratios
440: and are a factor of 4-6 more stable; specifically,
441: during our best L' NGS-AO nights (2002-2004)
442: images have Strehl ratios of 0.33 $\pm$ 0.06 and PSF FWHM of
443: 93 $\pm$ 5, or equivalently $\sigma_{wf}$ of 620 $\pm$ 50 nm
444: (see Ghez et al. 2004 and Hornstein et al., in prep).
445: This improvement is depicted in Figure 1, which compares the average of
446: all our L' LGS-AO images to the best NGS-AO L' image that we
447: obtained at the Keck telescope between 2002 and 2004; the improvement
448: stems primarily from
449: having a much brighter, by about 2 mag, on-axis source to correct for the
450: non-tip/tilt
451: atmospheric aberrations with the LGS-AO system, compared to the faint
452: (R=13.2 mag) off-axis (30$\arcsec$) star used for the NGS-AO observations.
453: The LGS-AO image is the highest quality L' image
454: obtained thus far of the center of our Galaxy.
455: Somewhat better K' performance
456: has been obtained with the VLT's NGS AO system since it has an infrared
457: wavefront sensor to take advantage of the bright, very nearby,
458: infrared source IRS7 (K=6.4
459: mag) and the Galactic center passes directly overhead (versus a 50 deg
460: zenith angle from Hawaii). However, this is only possible within the
461: isoplanatic angle ($\sim$20$\arcsec$ at 2$\mu$m) of this source, since no
462: other comparably bright infrared source exists in this region.
463: Figure 2 shows the remarkably large field coverage that is now possible
464: with the LGS-AO system. This $76\arcsec \times 76\arcsec$
465: region is the largest area imaged at the diffraction limit of a 8-10 meter
466: telescope by a factor of 4 and has a much more uniform point spread
467: function over comparable areas. This approach is limited only by
468: the isokinetic angle
469: ($\sim$40-75$\arcsec$ at 2 $\mu$m), which is much larger than the isoplanatic angle, and by the
470: availability of tip-tilt stars, which need not be as bright as the
471: natural guide stars necessary to correct all the aberrations, and
472: which are therefore much more plentiful.
473:
474: \section{RESULTS}
475:
476: The improved image quality greatly facilitates detailed study of
477: the infrared emission arising in the crowded region in the vicinity
478: of our Galaxy's central black hole.
479: %High stellar densities and modest stellar intensity variations make
480: %obtaining an accurate light curve and position for Sgr A*-IR a challenge.
481: Within a radius of 0\farcs 15 of the dynamical center of our Galaxy,
482: there are three known proper motion sources (S0-2, S0-17, S0-20;
483: Ghez et al. 2005),
484: all of which are detected in both the K' and L' LGS-AO images
485: (see Table~\ref{tab_srcs} and Figure~\ref{extended}).
486: In addition, the L' LGS-AO image reveals a new source (L' $\sim$ 13.3 mag),
487: whose photocenter is located 0\farcs 094 South-West from Sgr A*-IR
488: (see Figure~\ref{extended} (left)).
489: This source, which was originally reported by Ghez et al. (2004) and
490: has since been independently reported by Cl\'enet et al. (2005; labeled
491: SgrA*-f), can be
492: equally well modeled as two roughly equal point
493: sources separated by 0\farcs 057 or as a two-dimensional gaussian that
494: has a major-axis of 120 mas (corresponding to an intrinsic size of $\sim$
495: 80 mas). No source is detected at this location
496: in the K' LGS-AO image down to $\sim$ 16.1 mag (2$\sigma$), which implies that
497: its (K'-L') must be redder than 2.8 mag (observed) or 1.2 mag (de-reddened).
498: Combining the photocenter of this LGS-AO detection with the photocenter
499: detections of this source in our earlier NGS-AO maps (Ghez et al. 2004
500: [2002 May 31 \& 2003 June 10, 16-17];
501: Hornstein et al., in prep [2004 June 25-28 \& 2004 July 6-7]), which do not
502: spatially resolve the source, we find its proper motion to be statistically
503: consistent with zero to within 2$\sigma$ (9.6 $\pm$ 4.1 mas yr$^{-1}$).
504:
505: \begin{figure}
506: \epsscale{1.0}
507: \plotone{f4.eps}
508: \figcaption{
509: Light curve for Sgr A*-IR.
510: The near simultaneity (within
511: 1 minute) of the K' and L' measurements at $\sim$8:26 (UT) provide the
512: first measurement of Sgr A*-IR's K'-L' color.
513: Significant flux density variations are also detected
514: both within the K' (unfilled points) and L' (filled points) measurements.
515: The emission from Sgr A*-IR is observed to increase, peak, and then
516: decrease by a factor of two in 8 minutes. Another $\sim$30 minutes later
517: it is observed to have a flux density of only 1.3 mJy at 3.8 $\mu$m.
518: This is the lowest level Sgr A*-IR has ever been detected by
519: a factor of 3, suggesting that no true steady-state level has yet
520: been observed.
521: \label{lightcurve}
522: }
523: \end{figure}
524:
525:
526: In spite of the stellar crowding, Sgr A*-IR is also clearly detected in
527: both the average K' and L' images as well as in the majority of
528: the individual L' and K' images (see Table~\ref{tab_sum}
529: and Figure 3).
530: At the beginning of our
531: observations, Sgr A*-IR at K' appears to brighten and reach a peak of
532: K'$_{obs} \sim$15.5.
533: At the end of the K' sequence, Sgr A* has a K'$_{obs}$
534: magnitude of 15.6 $\pm$ 0.2 or, equivalently, a de-reddened flux density
535: of 7 $\pm$ 1 mJy. After a time gap of $\sim$1 min, its
536: observed L' magnitude is 12.58 $\pm$ 0.09 (F$_{3.8 \mu m, de-reddened}$ =
537: 9.7 $\pm$ 0.8 mJy). This provides an estimate of the color of
538: Sgr A* of (K'-L')$_{obs}$ = 3.0 $\pm$ 0.2 or (K'-L')$_{de-reddened}$ = 1.4 $\pm$ 0.2.
539: Over the course of only 8 minutes, its flux density decreases by a factor of 2
540: and, another 27 minutes later,
541: Sgr A* is a factor of 3 fainter still, or 1.3 mJy (de-reddened), in the
542: L' photometric bandpass. This is the faintest Sgr A*-IR has ever
543: been detected at L', by a factor of 3.
544: From the average images, we find that Sgr A*-IR's positional offsets
545: from the Galaxy's dynamical center
546: are statistically consistent with zero at both K' and L'
547: ([$\Delta_{RA, K'}= -2 \pm 4 ~ mas$, $\Delta_{Dec, K'}= 0 \pm 3 ~ mas$] and
548: [$\Delta_{RA, L'}= -4 \pm 2 ~ mas$, $\Delta_{Dec, L'} = -7 \pm 3 ~ mas$],
549: using the Ghez et al. 2005 determination of the dynamical center).
550: From the individual images, there is no evidence for variation in the
551: location of SgrA*-IR
552: as a function intensity; previous claim
553: of such positional variations from Cl\'enet et al. (2005) at L' are
554: easily attributable
555: to the nearby extended, very red source discussed above.
556: %([$\Delta_{RA, K'}= 0 \pm 3 mas$, $\Delta_{Dec, K'}= 6 \pm 3 mas$] and
557: %[$\Delta_{RA, L'}= -8 \pm 3 mas$, $\Delta_{Dec, L'} = 2 \pm 3 mas$]);
558: %the uncertainties in the offsets are dominated
559: %by the positional uncertainties in the LGS-AO images.
560: Since both the photometric and astrometric measurements were made with a
561: PSF-fitting routine and since all the known neighboring sources as well as
562: a background, which is allowed to have low spatial frequency structure,
563: are part of the model, our reported values should be free of bias from the
564: surrounding stellar population and background emission.
565:
566: \section{DISCUSSION}
567:
568: \subsection{Extended Red Emission in the Vicinity of Sgr A*}
569:
570: There are several possible explanations for the extended red source
571: located 90 mas South-West of Sgr A*.
572: First, one might consider that it consists of multiple red stars that
573: are blended in the image. However, we expect the old stellar
574: population to be centered on Sgr A*, so if this were the explanation,
575: the displacement would have to be due to the chance placement of a
576: relatively small number of objects, presumably giants. However, even
577: giants are not as red as the extended red emission, unless they are
578: subject to additional extinction beyond that suffered by Sgr A*.
579: This
580: would then have to correspond to an unlikely placement of multiple
581: giants remarkably close in projection to Sgr A*, yet located in the
582: background behind additional extinction. A second possibility is that
583: this emission is from an off-center region within an accretion disk
584: around Sgr A*. Off-center brightening in an accretion disk has been
585: predicted by Nayakshin et al. (2004) as a response to
586: the passage of stars through the accretion disk, but this mechanism
587: gives rise to an unresolved source, rather than to the observed,
588: extended emission, so one would have to posit multiple recent star-disk
589: passages in this particular region, which is also rather unlikely.
590:
591: The third explanation is that the extended red source is
592: attributable to thermal emission from a dust cloud.
593: Indeed, there is a dust feature projected near Sgr A* in
594: this direction, as can be seen in mid-IR images (Stolovy et al. 1996).
595: It is tempting to hypothesize that this
596: feature lies close to Sgr A* and that energy from Sgr A* and its
597: immediate entourage of early-type stars heats the dust, giving rise to
598: a temperature gradient that declines away from Sgr A*.
599: However, if the extended dust feature is close
600: enough to Sgr A* to be heated by it, it is problematical that it has not
601: already been sheared by the tidal interaction into a ring around
602: Sgr A*. Furthermore, for an intact object, we
603: would expect a displacement on the order of 60 mas yr$^{-1}$ -- far
604: larger than our limit of $\sim$ 10 mas yr$^{-1}$ -- if the distance of
605: the extended red feature from SgrA* were comparable to its projected distance of
606: 94 mas. It is therefore quite
607: likely that the extended red dust feature is projected
608: along the line of sight toward Sgr A*, and that it is heated by an
609: embedded or a nearby star.
610:
611: Only a small amount of dust is required to generate the observed emission.
612: The 3.8-$\mu$m opacity of the dust cloud must
613: be quite small, given its size and surface brightness:
614: $\tau(T_d)~=~10^{-6}\times(exp(3787/1200K)~-~1)/(exp(3787/T_d)~-~1)$.
615: Here, the dust temperature, $T_d$, is referenced to its upper limit of 1200 K,
616: derived from the dereddened limit on the K'-L' color, and assuming an emissivity
617: dependence Q$_{\lambda}~\propto~\lambda^{-1}$.
618: With these assumptions, the bolometric luminosity of the source
619: can be crudely estimated:
620: L = 1.2 L$_{\odot}$ (T$_d$/1200)$^5~\tau(T_d)/\tau(1200 K)$.
621: Assuming further that the source depth is equal to its width on the sky, and
622: that the gas-to-dust ratio is 100, we find a total source mass equal to
623: 1.3$\times10^{-10}~M_{\odot}~\tau(T_d)/\tau(1200 K)$, clearly a very
624: modest clump.
625: % Other assumptions for the mass: the emission coefficient,
626: % Q$_{\lambda}~=~2\pia/\lambda$ for grain radius {\it a}, and
627: % the density of grain material is 2 gm/cm^3.
628:
629:
630: \subsection{Infrared Color of Sgr A*}
631:
632: The radiative emission emerging from the vicinity of
633: our Galaxy's supermassive black hole has puzzled
634: modelers for three decades.
635: Its total luminosity
636: is only 10$^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$, or 10$^{-9}$ of the
637: Eddington luminosity for a $3.7 \times 10^6 M_{\odot}$
638: black hole,
639: most of which is emitted at radio wavelengths.
640: To account for the low luminosity, current models
641: rely on radiative inefficiencies in either, or
642: some combination of, an accretion flow or an outflow
643: (see, e.g., review by Melia \& Falcke 2001).
644: Further complicating the picture,
645: recent observations have revealed
646: X-ray and infrared emission, which both show
647: significant variability at timescales as short
648: as tens of minutes (Baganoff et al. 2001; Goldwurm et al.
649: 2003; Porquet et al. 2005; Genzel et al. 2003a; Ghez
650: et al. 2004; Eckart et al. 2004). While
651: there is still considerable debate regarding the
652: physical origin of this variable component, many
653: of the models have adopted a magnetic mechanism
654: in which the infrared variability is due to
655: synchrotron emission from a temporarily accelerated population
656: of electrons and the X-ray emission is either
657: a continuation of this synchrotron emission or
658: synchrotron self-Comptonized emission from
659: the same electron population that gives rise to
660: the infrared emission.
661:
662: \begin{figure}
663: \epsscale{1.0}
664: \plotone{f5.eps}
665: \figcaption{
666: Sgr A*'s infrared spectral index ($\alpha$, where $F_{\nu} \sim \nu^{\alpha}$)
667: as a function of its 2 $\mu$m
668: flux density. Our measurement is the filled point and measurements
669: from Eisenhauer et al. (2005) are the unfilled points. We
670: suggest that the spectral index may depend on the strength of Sgr A*'s
671: infrared brightness.
672: \label{alpha}
673: }
674: \end{figure}
675:
676:
677:
678: The results from this paper support the synchrotron
679: flare models in a number of ways.
680: First, our observations show that, unlike at
681: X-ray wavelengths, the emission at infrared
682: wavelengths appears to have no true steady-state
683: component\footnote{It should be noted that the X-ray
684: steady-state component is spatially resolved with a size
685: that corresponds to the Bondi radius ($\sim$1$\arcsec$)
686: and thus comes from scales much larger than are being
687: probed at infrared wavelengths.}.
688: Our L'= 14.7 mag, or de-reddened flux
689: density of 1.3 mJy, detection of Sgr A*-IR is a factor
690: of 3 fainter than any previous detection. So while
691: temporarily stable flux densities (the so-called
692: ``interim quiescent" values) have been reported by
693: Genzel et al. (2003) and Eckart et al. (2004), there appears to be
694: no long-term true steady state at infrared wavelengths.
695: Here it is worth adding a cautionary note regarding
696: the results that are derived from aperture photometry;
697: in such a crowded field apparent steady-states can easily
698: be created from stellar confusion, the level of which will change
699: on roughly month timescales due to the motions of stars
700: as they undergo periapse passage. If the flares are
701: caused by magnetic field reconnection or some other local
702: heating event that generates a highly accelerated electron
703: population, there is no predicted steady-state component.
704:
705: A second source of support for synchrotron flare models
706: from this work is the observed infrared colors, which
707: are predicted and observed to be red. However it
708: is interesting to note that the infrared color
709: reported here and by Eisenhauer et al. (2005),
710: while both red, are significantly different from each other.
711: Our observed K'-L' color of 3.0 $\pm$ 0.2 corresponds
712: to a de-reddened value of 1.4 $\pm$ 0.2, which if modeled as a power
713: law ($F_{\nu} = \nu^{\alpha}$) gives $\alpha$ = -0.5 $\pm$ 0.3.
714: As shown in Figure ~\ref{alpha}, this is substantially bluer than the
715: spectral index
716: obtained by Eisenhauer, $\alpha \sim -4 \pm 1$, from spectral
717: observations between 2.0 and 2.4 $\mu$m. While these spectral
718: indices are inferred from different types of measurements, it is
719: difficult to invoke a calibration error, such as improper re-reddening or
720: data extraction, or the 1 minute time lag in our observations, that is
721: large enough to account for the discrepant spectral indices.
722: It is however straight forward to invoke plausible physical differences.
723: A spectral break between 2.4 and 3.8 $\mu$m could account
724: for the different inferred spectral indices. Such a spectral break
725: is necessary to invoke
726: between the Eisenhauer measurement and the de-reddened
727: mid-infrared limits from Sgr A*
728: reported by Morris (2001; 50 mJy at 12.5 $\mu$m, 70 mJy at 20.8 $\mu$m, and
729: 85 mJy at 24.5 $\mu$m), since a constant power-law extrapolated
730: from our lowest L' measurement would imply extremely
731: large mid-infrared fluxes (150 - 2300 mJy). However, this is not
732: necessary for our values,
733: which predict mid-infrared fluxes of only $\sim$ 2 - 3 mJy, well below
734: the current mid-infrared limits, from
735: extrapolations of our lowest L' measurement.
736: Furthermore, while such large spectral breaks might be reasonable
737: to invoke between near-infrared and mid-infrared wavelengths,
738: they are rather difficult to invoke over the small wavelength
739: difference between our experiment and that of Eisenhauer et al. (2005).
740: More intriguingly, as an explanation, the spectral index
741: derived by this work was obtained from measurements taken
742: when Sgr A*-IR was a factor of $\sim$6 brighter than it was
743: during the Eisenhauer measurements (see Figure \ref{alpha}).
744: Thus a possible cause for the discrepancy may be an
745: infrared spectral index that depends on the strength of Sgr A*-IR's emission.
746: Such a dependence could suggest that events that generate
747: a higher fraction of energetic electrons are responsible
748: the stronger infrared flares.
749:
750: \section{SUMMARY}
751:
752: We have obtained the first observations of the Galactic center with
753: a Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics system,
754: demonstrating the power of this technique. It
755: has produced the sharpest L'(3.8 $\mu$m) images yet of this region.
756: Furthermore, compared to Keck's NGS-AO performance on the
757: Galactic center, LGS-AO results in L' Strehl ratios that are a factor of
758: two higher and a factor of four to five more stable. This
759: imaging performance enhancement has permitted us to clearly image
760: an extended infrared emission feature located a mere 90 mas from
761: the central black hole. This object is likely to be a relatively hot
762: dust feature that is locally heated by an embedded or nearby star
763: and that is projected along the line of sight toward Sgr A*.
764: In addition, with improved
765: image quality, Sgr A* can be reliably detected in much shorter
766: time exposures, which has permitted a measurement of Sgr A*'s infrared
767: color. In our measurement, Sgr A* is much bluer and brighter than was
768: measured by Eisenhauer et al. (2005). Among the many possible
769: interpretations
770: for this discrepancy, one intriguing possibility is that Sgr A*'s
771: infrared
772: spectral index is variable and that events leading to
773: stronger infrared flares generate a higher fraction of energetic
774: electrons. In conclusion, LGS-AO has improved the quality
775: and versatility with which diffraction-limited observations
776: can be made at the Keck telescope and is ushering in an exciting
777: new era of observations of the Galactic center.
778:
779:
780: \acknowledgements
781:
782: The authors thank observing assistants Cynthia Wilburn
783: and Gary Puniwai for their help in obtaining the observations
784: as well as Reinhard Genzel and Quinn Konopacky for useful comments on the
785: manuscript.
786: Support for this work was provided by NSF
787: grant AST-0406816 and the NSF Science
788: \& Technology Center for AO, managed by UCSC
789: (AST-9876783), and the Packard Foundation.
790: The W. M. Keck Observatory,
791: is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute
792: of Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronautics and
793: Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous
794: financial
795: support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. The authors wish to recognize and
796: acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit
797: of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are
798: most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this
799: mountain.
800:
801:
802:
803: \pagebreak
804:
805: \begin{thebibliography}{}
806:
807: \bibitem[]{670} Baganoff, F.~K.~et al.\ 2001, \nat, 413, 45
808:
809: \bibitem {} Blum, R. D., Sellgren, K., \& DePoy, D. L. 1996, \apj, 470, 864
810:
811: \bibitem[]{674} Cl\'enet, Y., Rouan, D., Gratadour, D., Marco, O., L\'ena, P.,
812: Ageorges, N., \& Gendron, E. 2005, \aap, in press (astro-ph/0507088)
813:
814: \bibitem[]{677} Diolaiti, E., Bendinelli, O.,
815: Bonaccini, D., Close, L., Currie, D., \& Parmeggiani, G.\ 2000, \aaps,
816: 147, 335
817:
818: \bibitem[]{681} Eckart, A. et al. 2004, \aap, 427, 1
819:
820: \bibitem[]{683} Eckart, A., \& Genzel, R. 1997, \mnras, 284, 576
821:
822: \bibitem{bib5} Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Ott, T., \&
823: Sch\"odel, R. 2002, \mnras, 331, 917
824:
825: \bibitem[]{688} Eisenhauer, F. et al. 2005, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0502129)
826:
827: \bibitem[]{690} Eisenhauer, F., Sch\"odel, R., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Tecza, M.,
828: Abuter, R., Eckart, A., \& Alexander, T. 2003, \apj, 597, L121
829:
830: \bibitem[]{693} Genzel, R., Pichon, C., Eckart, A., Gerhard, O. E., Ott, T.,
831: 2000, \mnras, 317, 348
832:
833: \bibitem[]{696} Genzel, R. Sch\"odel, R., Ott, T., Eckart, A., Alexander, T.,
834: Lacombe, F., Rouan, D., \& Aschenbach, B. 2003a, \nat, 425, 934
835:
836: \bibitem[]{699} Genzel, R. et al.\ 2003b, \apj, 594, 812
837:
838: \bibitem[]{701} Ghez, A.~M., Duch\^ene, G., Matthews, K., Hornstein, S.~D.,
839: Tanner, A., Larkin, J., Morris, M., Becklin, E.~E., Salim, S., Kremenek, T.,
840: Thompson, D., Soifer, B.T., Neugebauer, G., McLean, I. 2003, \apj, 586, L127
841:
842: \bibitem {}Ghez, A.~M., et al.\ 2004,
843: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 205, 2406
844:
845: \bibitem[]{708} Ghez, A.~M., Klein, B.~C., Morris, M.,
846: \& Becklin, E.~E. 1998, \apj, 509, 678
847:
848: \bibitem{bib13} Ghez, A.~M., Morris, M., Becklin,
849: E.~E., Tanner, A., \& Kremenek, T. 2000, \nat, 407, 349
850:
851: \bibitem[]{714} Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S. D., Tanner, A., Lu, J.,
852: Morris, M., Becklin, E. E., Duch\^ene, G. 2005, \apj, 620, 744
853:
854: \bibitem[]{717} Ghez, A.M., Wright, S.A., Matthews, K., Thompson, D.,
855: Le Mignant, D., Tanner, A., Hornstein, S.D., Morris, M., Becklin, \&
856: Soifer, B. T. 2004 \apjlett, 601, L159
857:
858: \bibitem[]{721} Goldwurm, A., Brion, E., Goldoni, P., Ferrando, P., Daigne, F.,
859: Dechourchelle, A., Warwick, R. S., Predehl, P. 2003, \apj, 584, 751
860:
861: \bibitem[]{} Hardy, J. W. ``Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes,"
862: Oxford University Press Inc, New York, NY
863:
864: \bibitem[]{724} Nayakshin, S., Cuadra, J., \& Sunyaev, R. 2004, A\&A 413, 173
865:
866: \bibitem[]{726} Meila, F., \& Falcke, H. 2001, \araa, 39, 309
867:
868: \bibitem[]{728} Moneti, A., Stolovy, S., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Figer, D. F.,
869: \& Najarro, F. 2001, \aap, 366, 106
870:
871: \bibitem {} Morris, M., Tanner, A.~M., Ghez, A.~M., Becklin, E.~E., Cotera, A.,
872: Werner, M.~W., \& Ressler, M.~E.\ 2001, BAAS, 33, 841
873:
874: \bibitem[]{734} Porquet, D., Predehl, P., Aschenback, B., Grosso, N., Goldwurm,
875: A., Goldoni, P., Warwick, R.S., Decourchelle, A. 2005, \aap, 430, 9L
876:
877: \bibitem{bib31} Sch\"odel, R. et al.\ 2002, \nat, 419, 694
878:
879: \bibitem[]{739} Sch\"odel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Mouawad,
880: N., \& Alexander, T. 2003, \apj, 596, 1015
881:
882: \bibitem[]{742} Scoville, N., Stolovy, S. R., Rieke, M., Christopher, M.,
883: \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2003, \apj, 594, 294
884:
885: \bibitem[]{745} Stolovy, S. R., Hayward, T. L., \& Herter, T. 1996, \apj,
886: 470, L45
887:
888: \bibitem[]{747} Tokunaga, A. T. 2000, in ``Allen's Astrophysical Quantities,"
889: ed. A. N. Cox, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc (New York)
890:
891:
892: \end{thebibliography}
893:
894:
895:
896: \end{document}
897: