1: %% \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
6:
7: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJL}
8:
9: \shorttitle{Millimeter observations of obscured Spitzer sources}
10: \shortauthors{Lutz et al.}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Millimeter observations of obscured Spitzer 24 micron sources}
15:
16: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
17: %% author and affiliation information.
18: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
19: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
20: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
21: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
22:
23: \author{D. Lutz\altaffilmark{1},
24: L. Yan \altaffilmark{2},
25: L. Armus \altaffilmark{2},
26: G. Helou \altaffilmark{2},
27: L.J. Tacconi \altaffilmark{1},
28: R. Genzel \altaffilmark{1},
29: A.J. Baker \altaffilmark{3,4}}
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
31: Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany \email{lutz@mpe.mpg.de,
32: linda@mpe.mpg.de, genzel@mpe.mpg.de} }
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of
34: Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 220-6, Pasadena,
35: CA 91125 \email{lyan@ipac.caltech.edu, lee@ipac.caltech.edu,
36: gxh@ipac.caltech.edu}}
37: \altaffiltext{3}{Jansky Fellow, National Radio Astronomy Observatory}
38: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland,
39: College Park, MD 20742-2421 \email{ajb@astro.umd.edu} }
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: We present MAMBO 1.2mm observations of 40 extragalactic sources from the
43: Spitzer First Look
44: Survey that are bright in the mid-infrared (S$_{24\mu m}>1$mJy) but
45: optically obscured ($log_{10}(\nu F_\nu (24\mu m)/\nu F_\nu (0.7\mu m))>1$).
46: We use these observations to search for cold dust emission, probing
47: the similarity of their spectral energy distributions to star forming infrared
48: galaxies or obscured AGN.
49: The sample as a whole is well detected at mean S$_{1.2mm}=0.74\pm0.09$mJy and
50: S$_{1.2mm}$/S$_{24\mu m}=0.15\pm0.03$. Seven (three) of the sources are
51: individually
52: detected at $>3\sigma$ ($>5\sigma$) levels. Mean millimeter fluxes are higher
53: for sources with the reddest mid-infrared/optical colors.
54: Optically faint but with relatively low mm to mid-infrared ratio,
55: the typical SEDs are inconsistent with
56: redshifted SED shapes of local star-forming infrared galaxies. They
57: also differ from SEDs of typical
58: submillimeter selected galaxies, with the 24$\mu$m sources that are
59: individually detected by MAMBO possibly representing intermediate objects.
60: Compared to star-forming galaxies, a stronger but optically obscured
61: mid-infrared component without
62: associated strong far-infrared emission has to be included. This component
63: may be due to luminous optically obscured AGN, which would
64: represent a significant part of the high redshift AGN population.
65:
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68: \keywords{galaxies: starburst, galaxies: active, infrared: galaxies}
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71: Significant progress has been made in the last few years in detecting infrared
72: galaxies at high redshift and characterizing their nature, evolution, and
73: contribution to the cosmic background. ISOCAM has detected at $15\,{\rm \mu
74: m}$ a population of $z \lesssim 1$ luminous star--forming galaxies
75: \citep[e.g.][]{elbaz02}, still fairly bright in the optical
76: \citep[e.g.][]{flores99}. SCUBA and MAMBO surveys of
77: small fields detect a distinct $z \sim 2.5$ population of hyperluminous
78: star--forming and active galaxies \citep[for a review see][]{blain02} that
79: are optically extremely faint \citep[e.g.][]{ivison02,dann04}.
80: Spitzer Space Telescope
81: $24\,{\rm \mu m}$ surveys sample the redshifted, rest--frame $6-12\,{\rm \mu
82: m}$ strong dust emission from PAH and very small grains in galaxies at $z
83: \sim 1-3$. Therefore, deep mid-IR observations using MIPS on Spitzer
84: offer a
85: new and efficient probe of dusty galaxies at high redshift
86: \citep[e.g.][]{perez05}. Spitzer $24\mu$m surveys are expected to
87: detect all of the ISOCAM and most of the
88: SCUBA/MAMBO sources, bridge the gap between these two populations in redshift
89: and luminosity, and search for entirely new categories of sources.
90:
91: The first non--proprietary Spitzer survey is the First Look Survey
92: (FLS), covering 3.7 square degrees in seven bands.
93: % (3.6, 4.5, 5.6, 8.0, 24, 70, and $160\,{\rm \mu m}$).
94: More than 18000 sources are detected to
95: the $3\sigma$ sensitivity of $110\,{\rm \mu Jy}$ at $24\,{\rm \mu m}$.
96: Combining deep optical, Spitzer IRAC $8\,{\rm \mu m}$, and MIPS
97: $24\,{\rm \mu m}$ data, \citet{yan04} have obtained the first
98: characterization of a large sample of $24\,{\rm \mu m}$--selected sources.
99: These sources have colors
100: ranging from those of relatively low--redshift, fairly inactive galaxies to
101: extremely red $24\,{\rm \mu m}/R$ and $24\,{\rm \mu m}/8\,{\rm \mu m}$ colors
102: that can only be explained by luminous obscured starbursts or AGN at high
103: redshift.
104: %(see the bottom panel of their Fig. 2 for the predicted redshift
105: %tracks of several template SEDs in color-color space)
106: The available
107: color information is not unique for identifying the nature of these objects,
108: however, and the applicability of the local SED templates has to be critically
109: examined. This is particularly true for the rare and extreme
110: $24\,{\rm \mu m}$--selected objects that the FLS sample includes due to its
111: large size.
112: In this letter we report on MAMBO 1.2mm observations of such rare
113: 24$\mu$m-bright but optically faint sources, providing a
114: constraint on the cold dust contribution to their spectral energy
115: distributions that is
116: essential for characterizing their nature and their relation to other
117: populations of high--redshift infrared galaxies.
118:
119: \section{Sample and Results}
120: \citet{yan04} used Spitzer mid-IR and ground-based optical photometry
121: for a first characterization of 24$\mu$m sources from the FLS. We have
122: selected for 1.2mm photometry a subset of bright
123: (S$_{24\mu m}>$1mJy) sources that are optically faint, as
124: evidenced by a 24$\mu$m to optical `color'
125: $R(24,0.7)\equiv log_{10}(\nu F_\nu (24\mu m)/\nu F_\nu (0.7\mu m))$ of at least 1 (R$>$22.5 for S$_{24\mu m}=$1mJy).
126: We have chosen 39 of the 145 sources meeting these criteria, and added one
127: with a slightly lower R(24,0.7). We refer to these sources as `obscured
128: 24$\mu$m sources'. The selection covers the full color spread of
129: the \citet{yan04}
130: objects (Fig.~\ref{fig:yancolor}), preferring objects brightest at 24$\mu$m,
131: and aiming for a large overlap with FLS objects studied
132: by Spitzer mid-IR spectroscopy \citep[][and in preparation]{yan05}.
133: Objects were selected using the \citet{yan04} flux catalogs. Since then,
134: slightly revised 24$\mu$m and 8$\mu$m fluxes (M. Lacy et al. in preparation)
135: have become available which we adopt in the following discussion.
136:
137: Observations were spread over the pool observing sessions at the IRAM
138: 30m telescope in fall/winter 2004/2005, using the 117 element version of
139: the Max Planck Millimeter Bolometer (MAMBO) array \citep{kreysa98}
140: operating at a wavelength of 1.2mm.
141: On-off observations were typically obtained in blocks of 6 scans of 20
142: subscans each, and repeated in later observing nights until reaching
143: noise near 0.66mJy or a 5$\sigma$ detection. The median 1.2mm noise level
144: reached for the sample is 0.59mJy (range 0.35 to 0.82mJy). The data were
145: reduced with standard procedures
146: in the MOPSIC package developed by R.~Zylka, using the default calibration
147: files for these two pool periods. Table~\ref{tab:fluxes} lists the resulting
148: 1.2mm fluxes and their statistical uncertainties.
149:
150: Three sources are detected individually at more than 5$\sigma$ with 1.2mm
151: fluxes
152: between 2.3 and 5.8mJy, and four more at 3$\sigma$ to 5$\sigma$. The total 40
153: object sample is well detected statistically at a mean flux of
154: 0.74$\pm$0.09mJy (Table~\ref{tab:detstat}). To investigate a dependence on
155: the mid-IR/optical colors, we have grouped the sample in four
156: color `quadrants' separated at R(24,0.7)=1.5 and
157: and R(24,8)=0.5. Due to the sample selection, these
158: quadrants contain similar numbers of objects by design.
159: Table~\ref{tab:detstat} shows
160: clear trends in the mean 1.2mm fluxes for these subsamples. Objects redder in
161: R(24,0.7) have significantly higher mean 1.2mm flux, and a trend may
162: also be present with R(24,8). Values quoted in
163: Table~\ref{tab:detstat} refer to means of the individual source data weighted
164: by the inverse of the noise squared. Very similar values are obtained
165: for equal weight means. The trend in the mean fluxes agrees with the
166: $>3\sigma$ detection of 7/24 objects at R(24,0.7)$>$1.5 vs. 0/16 at bluer
167: color. Using the formalism of \citet{stevens05}, this implies that the two
168: groups are different at 2.9$\sigma$ significance. The distribution of
169: 1.2mm vs. 24$\mu$m fluxes,
170: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:mambo24scatter}, is inconsistent with a
171: single flux ratio for the entire sample, or for the subsample
172: with R(24,0.7)$>$1.5. This is expected given the sample selection, and
173: emphasizes that the mean
174: values quoted in Table~\ref{tab:detstat} are formed over (sub)samples that
175: can have noticeable spreads of intrinsic properties.
176:
177: \section{Millimeter properties of obscured Spitzer sources}
178:
179: Our color selection implies that these objects must be heavily obscured and/or
180: at considerable redshift. This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:yanratios},
181: showing that even spectral energy distributions similar to `standard' dusty
182: starbursts like M82 fail to reproduce for plausible redshifts
183: R(24,0.7)$>$1.2, i.e. the vast majority of our sample. R(24,0.7) will
184: be yet lower for SEDs of UV-brighter starbursts like
185: NGC 7714. SEDs similar to the most
186: optically obscured local
187: ultraluminous infrared galaxies like Arp220 reach R(24,0.7)$>$1.5
188: for redshifts around 2, but even stronger emission at
189: observed 24$\mu$m (rest-frame 8$\mu$m for z$\approx$2) relative to the shorter
190: wavelengths is needed to reproduce the most extreme Spitzer
191: objects. The same is true for the SED of the well studied less
192: luminous but extremely obscured galaxy, NGC 4418. For this object, both the
193: 8$\mu$m and the 0.7$\mu$m flux are host dominated at z$\gtrsim$1.5.
194: Varying the nucleus to host ratio moves the source
195: diagonally in Fig.~\ref{fig:yanratios}.
196:
197: The millimeter observations provide a crucial test of the analogy to
198: local SEDs. Fig.~\ref{fig:mambo24} shows the expected ratio of 1.2mm
199: and 24$\mu$m flux density as a function of redshift, again for M82, Arp220,
200: and NGC 4418 SEDs. The seven objects with individual MAMBO detections are
201: reasonably close to the properties of these local templates.
202: At $S_{1.2mm}/S_{24\mu m}\sim 1\ldots 5$, they are in a range still
203: consistent with local infrared galaxy SEDs redshifted to z$\sim$2,
204: assuming a relatively high optical obscuration or modest additional
205: mid-iR emission.
206: In contrast, comparison of the templates to the mean values for the obscured
207: Spitzer sources (Table~\ref{tab:detstat}) shows that in fact neither SED
208: provides a good representation of the mean properties of our 24$\mu$m sources.
209: Arp 220 and NGC 4418--like SEDs, which were in a reasonable range of the
210: optical/mid-IR colors, predict by far too strong 1.2mm flux for
211: plausible redshifts. M82-like SEDs are closer to the observed mm to MIR ratio,
212: but predict too bright optical counterparts as noted above. We conclude from
213: the analysis of mean properties that
214: the sample of obscured 24$\mu$m contains many sources that are not well
215: fit by these local infrared luminous galaxy SED templates. Relative to
216: the templates, they require additional rest
217: frame mid-IR emission, due to a component that is both warm
218: (to avoid overproducing mm emission) and optically obscured.
219:
220: Another way of phrasing the need for `additional rest frame mid-IR
221: emission' is to state
222: that the overall infrared SED must be warm to hot, without a dominant
223: rest frame
224: far-IR peak. In a strongly simplifying single temperature blackbody
225: fit, the
226: observed 1.2mm to 24$\mu$m flux density ratio corresponds to a temperature
227: of $\sim$75K, i.e. intrinsic T$\gtrsim$200K if at z$\sim$2, and luminosities
228: of the order of 10$^{13}$L$_\odot$. The warm temperature is suggestive
229: of a strong AGN contribution. The SED of the most luminous radio-quiet
230: local quasar, PDS 456 \citep{yun04} is able to fit the 1.2mm/24$\mu$m ratio
231: for plausible redshifts (Fig.~\ref{fig:mambo24}), but this Type 1 object is
232: too bright in the UV/optical to explain the mid-IR/optical colors for
233: our sample. That more obscured AGN may be
234: able to meet that constraint can be illustrated using the {\em nuclear} SED
235: of the classical Seyfert 2 NGC 1068. Its nuclear FIR/submm emission can
236: currently be separated from the host only at 450$\mu$m with
237: S$_{450\mu m}\sim 1.5$Jy \citep{papadopoulos99}, but this can be combined
238: with the mid-IR AGN continuum \citep{lutz00} and the rest frame UV
239: taken from NED, to conclude that such an AGN SED
240: would satisfy the criteria for both faintness at 1.2mm
241: (Fig.~\ref{fig:mambo24}) and optical obscuration (Fig.~\ref{fig:yancolor}).
242: AGN in obscured 24$\mu$m sources must suffer intermediate obscuration,
243: sufficient to suppress the rest frame UV/optical but not
244: moving too much energy into far-IR re-emission. Separation from host
245: emission and spectral characterization of the rest frame far-IR emission
246: is currently incomplete for local obscured AGN, but objects like
247: IRAS F00183-00183 \citep{tran01,spoon04} do have more favourable
248: mid- to far-IR ratios than NGC 4418 and may fit the SEDs of some
249: obscured 24$\mu$m sources.
250:
251: Low 1.2mm/24$\mu$m flux ratios can also be obtained for low redshift
252: (z$\lesssim $1) infrared star-forming galaxy SEDs. As already noted, this
253: is ruled out for the adopted templates, by the failure to meet R(24,0.7)$>$1
254: at such redshifts (Fig.~\ref{fig:yanratios}). Contamination by similar sources
255: may occur at the low R(24,0.7) end of the MAMBO sample if the scatter in rest
256: frame SEDs extends towards smaller optical/mid-IR flux ratios. This
257: scenario becomes progressively unlikely for the
258: R(24,0.7)$>$1.5 sources with weak 1.2mm emission.
259:
260: \citet{hunt05} use the likely compactness of star formation events in
261: high redshift infrared galaxies to argue for SEDs of Blue Compact Dwarf
262: Galaxies as local analogues. The most extreme case,
263: SBS 0335-052, shows an absorbed warm mid-IR continuum
264: \citep{thuan99,houck04}. While this possible analogy has to be mentioned,
265: it is unclear to which extent such low metallicity dwarfs can
266: relate to
267: the luminous obscured 24$\mu$m sources. SBS 0335-052, in addition to its
268: mid-IR emission, has strong unobscured optical/UV
269: emission which would place it far off the color selection of obscured
270: 24$\mu$m sources. Rest frame submm information is not
271: available to place SBS 0335-052 on Fig.~\ref{fig:mambo24}.
272:
273: \section{Relation to other populations}
274:
275: (Sub)millimeter galaxies (SMGs) are the best studied pre-Spitzer
276: population of z$>1.5$ infrared galaxies, inferred to be objects at z$\sim$2.5
277: with roughly ULIRG like SEDs but much higher luminosity. Optical to
278: mid-IR colors of bright and obscured 24$\mu$m sources
279: (Figs.~\ref{fig:yancolor},\ref{fig:yanratios}) and their low surface density
280: compared to that of SMGs could have been consistent with
281: an identification of the yet more extreme luminosity end of the SMG
282: population as obscured 24$\mu$m sources. The small ratio
283: of 1.2mm and 24$\mu$m emission clearly argues against this being true for the
284: majority of the Spitzer sources. \citet{egami04}, \citet{ivison04}, and
285: \citet{frayer04} have
286: reported 24$\mu$m photometry of SMGs from SCUBA and MAMBO blank field and
287: radio preselected surveys. They find
288: much higher $S_{1.2mm}/S_{24\mu m}$, with median $\sim 12$, clearly
289: inconsistent with SMGs' and obscured Spitzer sources' having similar SED
290: shapes and redshifts. Again, the Spitzer objects with individual MAMBO
291: detections are closer to the SMG properties.
292:
293: \citet{blain04} discuss selection effects against warm SEDs in the SMG
294: population and the potential of Spitzer in avoiding them. In a related
295: effort, \citet{chapman04} have obtained spectroscopic redshifts of
296: optically faint
297: $\mu$Jy radio sources without submm detections, inferring under the
298: assumption of the radio -- far-IR correlation that these must represent
299: a population of ultraluminous star-forming z$\sim$2.2 galaxies
300: characterized by
301: intrinsically warm or hot dust continua. Little is known at present
302: about the rest-frame mid-IR properties of these sources, making an
303: assessment of the overlap with obscured 24$\mu$m sources difficult.
304: \citet{frayer04} report faint 24$\mu$m fluxes or nondetections of several
305: optically faint radio sources that have SCUBA 850$\mu$m flux upper
306: limits of order 8mJy. If these results are representative for the full
307: population
308: of optically faint radio sources, then their possible warm FIR SEDs cannot
309: extend down into the mid-IR, and their nature must be different from the
310: obscured 24$\mu$m sources. If, for example, their radio emission is AGN
311: boosted, their dust emission may be comparatively weak at all wavelengths.
312:
313: Mid-IR spectroscopy will play a key role in identifying the
314: nature of the rare obscured 24$\mu$m sources and their strong
315: mid-IR emission. \citet{houck05} and \citet{yan05} have reported the
316: first Spitzer IRS spectroscopy of such sources, finding a predominance of
317: continua and absorbed continua and indications for starburst PAH emission
318: in a subset of sources. The obscured continuum spectra, which are seen only
319: in a small minority of local infrared galaxies \citep{spoon02} but a
320: third to half of the obscured 24$\mu$m
321: sources in the subsamples already published by \citet{houck05} and
322: \citet{yan05}, indicate heavily embedded energy sources that
323: might be AGN. Redshift estimates, where they can be derived, suggest
324: z$\sim$1.5--3. As for the photometric evidence,
325: comparison to initial Spitzer spectroscopy of SMGs which shows PAHs
326: \citep{lutz05} suggests that the two populations have only modest overlap,
327: and that there is a large contribution of warm and possibly AGN like sources
328: to the obscured 24$\mu$m population.
329:
330: If a good part of the bright obscured 24$\mu$m sources contain luminous high z
331: AGN they will represent a
332: significant component of the high redshift AGN population. Our MAMBO sample
333: is a subset of about 150 similar objects (Fig.~\ref{fig:yancolor})
334: detected over
335: the 3.7 square degree FLS field. If many of these objects are
336: $L_{Bol}\sim10^{13}$L$_\odot$ AGN at z$\sim$1.5-3 their comoving number
337: density will be of the order $10^{-6}$Mpc$^{-3}$, comparable to that of
338: similar bolometric luminosity (M$_B<-25$) optically selected quasars
339: \citep{croom04}. The ongoing characterization of their redshift
340: distribution and SEDs will shed more light on this issue.
341:
342: \acknowledgments
343: Based on observations carried out with the IRAM 30m telescope and with the
344: Spitzer Space Telescope. We thank the IRAM staff for support and advice,
345: all pool observers for their help in obtaining the observations, and the
346: referee for helpful comments.
347:
348:
349: %Facilities: \facility{}
350:
351: %up to 8 authors, then first et al.
352:
353: \begin{thebibliography}{}
354: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2002)]{blain02} Blain, A.W., Smail, I., Ivison, R.J.,
355: Kneib, J.-P., Frayer, D.T., 2002, PhR, 369, 111
356: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2004)]{blain04} Blain, A.W., Chapman, S.C., Smail, I.,
357: Ivison, R. 2004, \apj, 611, 52
358: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2004)]{chapman04}Chapman, S.C., Smail, I.,
359: Blain, A.W., Ivison, R.J. 2004, \apj, 614, 671
360: \bibitem[Croom et al.(2004)]{croom04} Croom S.M., Smith, R.J., Boyle, B.J.,
361: Shanks, T., Miller, L., Outram, P.J., Loaring, N.S. 2004, \mnras, 249, 1397
362: \bibitem[Dannerbauer et al.(2004)]{dann04} Dannerbauer, H., Lehnert, M.D.,
363: Lutz, D., Tacconi, L., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Genzel, R., Menten, K. 2004,
364: \apj, 606, 664
365: \bibitem[Egami et al.(2004)]{egami04} Egami, E., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 130
366: \bibitem[Elbaz et al.(2002)]{elbaz02} Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C.J., Chanial, P.,
367: Aussel, H., Franceschini, A., Fadda, D., Chary, R.R. 2002, \aap, 384, 848
368: \bibitem[Flores et al.(1999)]{flores99} Flores, H., et al. 1999, \apj, 517, 148
369: \bibitem[F\"orster Schreiber et al.(2003)]{foerster03} F\"orster Schreiber,
370: N.M., Sauvage, M., Charmandaris, V., Laurent, O., Gallais, P., Mirabel, I.F.,
371: Vigroux, L. 2003, \aap, 399, 833
372: \bibitem[Frayer et al.(2004)]{frayer04} Frayer, D.T., et al. 2004, \apjs,
373: 154, 137
374: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houck04} Houck, J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 211
375: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2005)]{houck05} Houck, J., et al. 2005, \apj, 622, L105
376: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(2005)]{hunt05} Hunt, L., Maiolino, R. 2005, \apj,
377: 626, L15
378: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2002)]{ivison02} Ivison, R.J., et al. 2002, \mnras,
379: 337, 1
380: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2004)]{ivison04} Ivison, R.J., et al. 2004,
381: \apjs, 154, 124
382: \bibitem[Kreysa et al.(1998)]{kreysa98} Kreysa, E. et al.\ 1998, \procspie,
383: 3357, 319
384: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(2000)]{lutz00} Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Genzel, R.,
385: Moorwood, A.F.M., Alexander, T., Netzer, H., Sternberg, A. 2000, \apj, 536,
386: 697
387: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(2005)]{lutz05} Lutz, D., Valiante, E., Sturm, E.,
388: Genzel, R., Tacconi, L.J., Lehnert, M.D., Sternberg, A., Baker, A.J. 2005,
389: \apj, 625, L83
390: \bibitem[Papadopoulos \& Seaquist(1999)]{papadopoulos99} Papadopoulos, P.P.,
391: Seaquist, E.R. 1999, \apj, 514, L95
392: \bibitem[P\'erez Gonz\'alez et al.(2005)]{perez05} P\'erez Gonz\'alez, P.G.,
393: et al. 2005, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0505101)
394: \bibitem[Roche et al.(1986)]{roche86} Roche, P.F., Aitken, D.K., Smith, C.H.,
395: James, S.D. 1986, \mnras, 218, 19p
396: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2001)]{spoon01} Spoon, H.W.W., Keane, J.V.,
397: Tielens, A.G.G.M., Lutz, D., Moorwood, A.F.M. 2001, \aap, 365, L353
398: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2002)]{spoon02} Spoon, H.W.W., et al. 2002, \aap,
399: 385, 1022
400: \bibitem[Spoon et al.(2004)]{spoon04} Spoon, H.W.W., et al. 2004,
401: \apjs, 154, 184
402: \bibitem[Stevens et al.(2005)]{stevens05} Stevens, J.A., Page, M.J.,
403: Ivison, R.J., Carrera, F.J., Mittaz, J.P.D., Smail, I., McHardy, I.M. 2005
404: \mnras, 360, 610
405: \bibitem[Thuan et al.(1999)]{thuan99} Thuan, T.X., Sauvage, M., Madden, S.
406: 1999, \apj, 516, 783
407: \bibitem[Tran et al.(2001)]{tran01} Tran, Q.D., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, 527
408: \bibitem[Yan et al.(2004)]{yan04} Yan, L., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 60
409: \bibitem[Yan et al.(2005)]{yan05} Yan, L., et al. 2005, \apj, 628, 604
410: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2004)]{yun04} Yun, M.S., Reddy, N.A., Scoville, N.Z.,
411: Frayer, D.T., Robson, E.I., Tilanus, R.P.J. 2004, \apj, 601, 723
412: \end{thebibliography}
413: \clearpage
414: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrr}
415: \tablewidth{0pt}
416: \tablecaption{MAMBO 1.2mm fluxes of obscured 24$\mu$m sources
417: \label{tab:fluxes}}
418: \tablehead{
419: \colhead{ID}&\colhead{RA}&\colhead{DEC}&\colhead{$\rm S_{1.2mm}$}&
420: \colhead{$\rm S_{24\mu m}$}\\
421: \colhead{}&\colhead{J2000}&\colhead{J2000}&\colhead{mJy}&\colhead{mJy}
422: }
423: \startdata
424: 39&17:17:50.65&58:47:45.1&-0.14$\pm$0.65&5.04\\
425: 42&17:17:58.44&59:28:16.8& 0.43$\pm$0.62&4.93\\
426: 45&17:11:47.46&58:58:40.0& 0.16$\pm$0.65&4.75\\
427: 78&17:15:38.18&59:25:40.1&-0.25$\pm$0.62&3.11\\
428: 110&17:12:15.44&58:52:27.9&-0.42$\pm$0.55&2.40\\
429: 133&17:14:33.68&59:21:19.3& 0.01$\pm$0.57&2.08\\
430: 180&17:15:43.54&58:35:31.2& 1.26$\pm$0.44&1.76\\
431: 227&17:14:56.24&58:38:16.2&-0.41$\pm$0.58&1.55\\
432: 289&17:13:50.00&58:56:56.8& 2.28$\pm$0.35&1.34\\
433: 464&17:14:39.57&58:56:32.1&-0.27$\pm$0.65&1.00\\
434: 7967&17:18:31.68&59:53:17.2& 0.22$\pm$0.51&8.04\\
435: 7977&17:14:19.96&60:27:24.8&-1.18$\pm$0.63&5.78\\
436: 8034&17:12:10.28&60:18:58.1& 0.74$\pm$0.62&3.04\\
437: 8069&17:15:00.36&59:56:11.5& 0.21$\pm$0.63&2.51\\
438: 8107&17:16:38.65&59:49:44.4& 0.70$\pm$0.60&2.01\\
439: 8135&17:14:55.71&60:08:22.6& 3.49$\pm$0.49&1.85\\
440: 8182&17:14:34.56&60:28:28.7& 1.87$\pm$0.50&1.61\\
441: 8184&17:12:26.76&59:59:53.5& 0.72$\pm$0.62&1.61\\
442: 8185&17:14:22.85&60:28:34.7& 0.20$\pm$0.62&1.61\\
443: 8196&17:15:10.28&60:09:55.2& 0.99$\pm$0.43&1.57\\
444: 8245&17:15:36.34&59:36:14.8&-0.49$\pm$0.46&1.41\\
445: 8268&17:16:24.74&59:37:52.6&-0.45$\pm$0.78&1.31\\
446: 8377&17:17:33.51&59:46:40.4& 0.72$\pm$0.57&1.09\\
447: 15690&17:19:22.44&60:14:56.2& 0.89$\pm$0.52&5.44\\
448: 15776&17:20:50.66&59:32:54.2& 0.81$\pm$0.54&2.30\\
449: 15840&17:19:22.40&60:05:00.3&-0.08$\pm$0.57&1.90\\
450: 15880&17:21:19.46&59:58:17.2& 2.06$\pm$0.53&1.68\\
451: 15890&17:24:48.65&60:14:39.1& 0.65$\pm$0.67&1.64\\
452: 15929&17:24:06.95&59:24:16.3& 0.54$\pm$0.56&1.51\\
453: 15943&17:20:18.06&59:29:01.2& 0.14$\pm$0.55&1.46\\
454: 15972&17:25:29.32&59:57:30.7& 0.02$\pm$0.63&1.37\\
455: 16030&17:20:00.32&60:15:20.9& 0.09$\pm$0.69&1.25\\
456: 22195&17:20:44.81&58:29:23.7&-0.19$\pm$0.69&5.05\\
457: 22204&17:18:44.38&59:20:00.5& 0.27$\pm$0.51&4.29\\
458: 22303&17:18:48.80&58:51:15.1&-1.05$\pm$0.64&2.12\\
459: 22314&17:19:27.28&59:15:36.3& 1.70$\pm$0.55&2.02\\
460: 22397&17:20:05.96&59:17:45.0& 0.39$\pm$0.72&1.59\\
461: 22404&17:21:51.77&58:53:27.7& 0.66$\pm$0.59&1.57\\
462: 22563&17:22:49.00&58:50:27.5& 5.79$\pm$0.82&1.14\\
463: 22582&17:21:24.58&59:20:29.5& 2.22$\pm$0.53&1.11\\
464: \enddata
465: \end{deluxetable}
466: \clearpage
467:
468:
469: \begin{deluxetable}{cccrrr}
470: \tablewidth{0pt}
471: \tablecaption{Mean 1.2mm properties for different ranges of
472: mid-IR/optical colors\label{tab:detstat}}
473: \tablehead{
474: \colhead{R(24,0.7)} & \colhead{R(24,8)} & \colhead{N}
475: &\colhead{$\rm\sigma_{1.2}$}
476: &\colhead{$\rm S_{1.2mm}$}&\colhead{$\rm S_{1.2mm}/S_{24\mu m}$}\\
477: \colhead{} &\colhead{} &\colhead{} &\colhead{mJy} &\colhead{mJy} &\colhead{}
478: }
479: \startdata
480: all & all & 40 &0.59& 0.74$\pm$0.09&0.15$\pm$0.03\\
481: $<$1.5 &$<$0.5 & 8 &0.65& 0.15$\pm$0.22&0.01$\pm$0.05\\
482: $<$1.5 &$\geq$0.5& 8 &0.59& 0.46$\pm$0.20&0.26$\pm$0.11\\
483: $\geq$1.5&$<$0.5 & 15 &0.57& 0.91$\pm$0.14&0.18$\pm$0.05\\
484: $\geq$1.5&$\geq$0.5& 9 &0.53& 1.08$\pm$0.18&0.52$\pm$0.10\\
485: \enddata
486: \tablecomments{See Fig.~\ref{fig:yancolor} for the distribution of
487: sources within the R(24,0.7) and R(24,8) colors. $\rm\sigma_{1.2}$
488: indicates the median 1.2mm flux error for the sources in each bin.}
489: \end{deluxetable}
490:
491: \clearpage
492:
493: \begin{figure}
494: \epsscale{0.7}
495: \plotone{f1.eps}
496: \caption{Optical/mid-IR color-color plot of bright ($>$1mJy) 24$\mu$m
497: sources from the \citet{yan04} Spitzer FLS sample,
498: indicated by small crosses. Sources
499: with R(24,0.7)$<$1 are not shown. Asterisks highlight the targets
500: observed by MAMBO, big asterisks those individually detected by MAMBO at
501: the $\geq 3\sigma$ level. 8$\mu$m and optical limits are 3$\sigma$.}
502: \label{fig:yancolor}
503: \end{figure}
504:
505: \clearpage
506:
507: \begin{figure}
508: \epsscale{0.6}
509: \plotone{f2.eps}
510: \caption{MAMBO 1.2mm fluxes as a function of 24$\mu$m fluxes. 24$\mu$m errors
511: are smaller than the symbols. Sources with R(24,0.7)$>$1.5 are shown as
512: diamonds, others as asterisks.}
513: \label{fig:mambo24scatter}
514: \end{figure}
515:
516: \clearpage
517:
518: \begin{figure}
519: \epsscale{0.7}
520: \plotone{f3.eps}
521: \caption{Mid-IR/optical colors for redshifted objects with
522: the SEDs of the star forming infrared galaxies M82 and Arp220, and of the
523: heavily obscured galaxy NGC 4418. Locations of the FLS sources observed by
524: MAMBO are repeated from Fig.~\ref{fig:yancolor}. Redshifts
525: from 0 to 3 are marked in intervals of 0.5. The adopted SEDs are based on
526: observations for large apertures taken from the literature. The key rest
527: frame mid-IR range uses the
528: ISOCAM-CVF low resolution spectra of \citet{foerster03} for M82, O. Laurent
529: (priv. comm) for Arp 220, and ISOPHOT-S \citep{spoon01} and groundbased spectra
530: \citep{roche86} for NGC 4418. The colors of the nuclear region of the Type 2
531: AGN NGC 1068 shifted to z$\sim$1.67 are indicated by a cross.}
532: \label{fig:yanratios}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: \clearpage
536:
537: \begin{figure}
538: \epsscale{0.7}
539: \plotone{f4.eps}
540: \caption{Ratio of 1.2mm and 24$\mu$m flux density as a function of redshift
541: for local SED templates. The SEDs of M82 and
542: Arp220 represent typical and extremely obscured star-forming infrared
543: galaxies. NGC 4418 is an extremely obscured compact object possibly hosting an
544: AGN. PDS456 is a luminous quasar whose infrared SED is dominated by the AGN
545: mid-IR emission, with a weak far-IR component. The AGN dominated
546: nuclear region of NGC 1068 is only shown for a single redshift where the rest
547: frame submm emission of the nucleus can be spatially isolated.
548: The horizontal continuous
549: line shows the mean ratio for our sample. Horizontal dotted lines indicate
550: the range spanned by the targets that are individually detected by
551: MAMBO. The horizontal dashed line indicates the median 1.2mm to 24$\mu$m
552: flux ratio for submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) -- see text for references.
553: }
554: \label{fig:mambo24}
555: \end{figure}
556:
557: \clearpage
558:
559:
560: \end{document}
561: