1: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass{aastex}
5: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
6: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
7:
8: \newcommand{\degg}{\hbox{$^\circ$}}
9: \newcommand{\PG}{PG\,1211+143}
10: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}}
11: \newcommand{\asca}{{\it ASCA}}
12: \newcommand{\sax}{{\it Beppo-SAX}}
13: \newcommand{\arcm}{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
14: \newcommand{\arcs}{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
15: \newcommand{\Msun}{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace M_{\odot}$}}
16: \newcommand{\ls}
17: {\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
18: \newcommand{\gs}
19: {\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
20: \def\Msun{\hbox{$\rm ~M_{\odot}$}}
21:
22: %\received{2004 March 31}
23:
24: \received{}
25: \begin{document}
26: \title{Evidence for Gravitational Infall of Matter onto the
27: Super-Massive Black Hole in the quasar PG 1211+143?}
28: \shorttitle{Gravitational Infall of Matter in PG\,1211+143}
29: \shortauthors{Reeves et al.}
30: \author{J.N. Reeves\altaffilmark{1,2}, K. Pounds\altaffilmark{3},
31: P. Uttley\altaffilmark{1}, S. Kraemer\altaffilmark{1,4},
32: R. Mushotzky\altaffilmark{1}, T. Yaqoob\altaffilmark{1,2},
33: I.M George\altaffilmark{1,5}, T.J. Turner\altaffilmark{1,5}}
34:
35: \altaffiltext{1}{Exploration of the Universe Division,
36: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA;
37: jnr@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov, pu@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov,
38: richard@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov}
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins
40: University, N Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;
41: yaqoob@skysrv.pha.jhu.edu}
42: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
43: Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; kap@star.le.ac.uk}
44: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, Catholic University of America,
45: 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20064, USA;
46: stiskraemer@yancey.gsfc.nasa.gov}
47: \altaffiltext{5}{Joint Center for Astrophysics, University of Maryland
48: Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA;
49: george@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov, turner@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov}
50: \begin{abstract}
51:
52: We report the detection of redshifted iron K$\alpha$
53: absorption lines in the Chandra LETG spectrum of the
54: narrow-line quasar, \PG. The absorption lines are observed at 4.22\,keV
55: and 4.93\,keV in the quasar spectrum, corresponding to 4.56\,keV and
56: 5.33\,keV in the rest frame of \PG. From Monte Carlo simulations, the
57: chance probability of both lines
58: being false detections is low at $1.36\times10^{-4}$.
59: Highly redshifted ionized iron K$\alpha$ (Fe~\textsc{xxv}
60: or Fe~\textsc{xxvi})
61: is the most plausible identification for the lines at their observed energies.
62: If identified with H-like iron K$\alpha$ at 6.97 keV, then the relativistic
63: velocity shifts required are 0.40c and 0.26c. The extreme velocities
64: can be explained by pure gravitational redshift if the
65: matter exists in a stable orbit within 6 gravitational
66: radii of the black hole. This would require a Kerr metric for the black hole.
67: Alternatively the absorption may be the result of matter infalling directly
68: onto the black hole, with a maximum observed velocity of 0.38c at
69: $6R_{\rm g}$ in the Schwarzschild metric.
70: This matter may originate in a failed outflow or
71: jet, which does not escape the gravitational potential of the black hole.
72:
73: \end{abstract}
74:
75: \keywords{black hole physics --- quasars: individual: PG 1211+143 --- X-rays: galaxies}
76:
77: \section{Introduction}
78:
79: One prime motivation of high energy research into Active Galactic
80: Nuclei is to find evidence for the putative massive black hole,
81: through the gravitational redshift imparted on photons emerging within a few
82: gravitational radii of the event horizon.
83: To date, most of the effort has focused on the
84: iron K$\alpha$ emission line, predicted to show a relativistically
85: broadened profile \citep{Fabian89, Laor91}, which
86: appeared to be common among Seyfert 1 galaxies, as observed by ASCA
87: \citep{Tanaka95, Nandra97}. However the situation emerging from the
88: newer XMM-Newton and Chandra data is more ambiguous, the spectra
89: showing that narrower (non-relativistic) lines
90: are commonplace \citep{Yaqoob04}. Indeed the red-wing
91: of the broad iron line is often hard to distinguish from the
92: effects of the warm absorber \citep{Reeves04, Turner05a}.
93:
94: Given the ambiguity in modeling the broad iron line,
95: additional diagnostics of the inner disk material are needed.
96: Narrow, transient and redshifted iron emission lines of
97: modest statistical significance
98: have recently been claimed in several AGN \citep{Turner02, Dovciak04,
99: Porquet04} possibly originating from local hot-spots on the disk surface.
100: Potentially these lines can be tracked to reveal orbital motions in the
101: inner disk \citep{Dovciak04, Turner05b}. However little evidence has
102: been found to date for infall of matter onto the black hole.
103: In this paper, we present evidence of highly redshifted iron K$\alpha$
104: absorption lines in the narrow-line Seyfert 1, \PG\ with Chandra LETG.
105: This may either be interpreted as infall onto the massive black hole,
106: or gravitational redshift occurring within $<6R_{\rm g}$ of a Kerr black
107: hole. \PG\ (at z=0.0809) is a prototypical `Big Blue Bump' quasar,
108: and one of the brightest AGN in the soft X-ray band \citep{Walter93}.
109: A previous XMM-Newton observation of \PG\ showed blue-shifted absorption
110: from a high velocity ($v\sim0.1c$) outflow \citep{Pounds03}.
111: %probably arising
112: %as a consequence of the high accretion rate in this quasar.
113: The soft X-ray properties of
114: \PG, which confirm the blue-shifted absorber, will
115: be presented in a subsequent paper.
116: %In this letter, we present evidence of highly redshifted iron K$\alpha$
117: %absorption lines in a Chandra observation of \PG. The
118: %emission lines may either be interpreted as the signature of matter
119: %infalling onto the massive black hole in PG 1211+143 or from gravitational
120: %redshift occurring within $<6R_{\rm g}$ of a Kerr black hole. A subsequent
121: %paper will discuss the soft X-ray spectrum of PG 1211+143 and
122: %the modeling of the highly ionized outflow from this quasar.
123: Values of H$_{\rm 0}$=70\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$,
124: $q_{\rm 0}$=0.0 and $\Lambda_{\rm 0}=0.73$ are
125: assumed and errors are quoted at 90\%
126: confidence ($\Delta\chi^{2}=2.7$), for 1 parameter of interest.
127:
128: \section{Chandra and XMM-Newton Observations of PG 1211+143}
129:
130: PG 1211+143 was observed by Chandra with the Low Energy Transmission Grating
131: (LETG) in 3 consecutive orbits between
132: 21 June 2004 and 26 June 2004 of approximately 45\,ks exposure per orbit
133: (see Table 1). An XMM-Newton observation was conducted simultaneously with the
134: first Chandra orbit, but due to high and variable background, this was
135: reduced to only $\sim$20\,ks useful exposure.
136: The ACIS-S detector was used on the focal plane, with the S3 chip being
137: at the telescope aimpoint. Chandra LETG
138: source spectra, background spectra and response matrices were generated
139: using CIAO 3.2.1. Streaks were removed from the ACIS-S CCD array, while
140: events with grades 0, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were selected. After screening
141: an exposure of 133.6 ks was obtained.
142: Spectra and responses from the $\pm1$ orders were extracted and
143: combined to maximize signal to noise. The time-averaged combined first order
144: LETG count rate was 0.31 counts~s$^{-1}$. Data
145: from the zeroth order image were not used, due to photon pile-up. The 1st order
146: spectra were binned so that one bin represents the FWHM resolution
147: of the LETG ($\Delta\lambda=0.05$), ensuring sufficient counts per bin
148: to use the $\chi^{2}$ minimization spectral fitting technique.
149:
150: \section{LETG Spectral Analysis}
151:
152: To parameterize the X-ray continuum, the LETG spectrum was fitted with
153: a broken power-law model, modified by neutral Galactic absorption of
154: $N_{\rm H}=2.8\times10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ \citep{Dickey90},
155: over the 0.4-8.0 keV bandpass.
156: The soft and hard X-ray photon indices, break energy and model
157: normalization were allowed to vary; the best fit values are
158: $\Gamma_{\rm soft}=2.77\pm0.03$, $\Gamma_{\rm hard}=1.96\pm0.05$,
159: break energy $E=1.7\pm0.1$~keV and normalized flux
160: of $1.6\pm0.1\times10^{-3}$~photons~keV$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$
161: (at 1 keV).
162: The integrated flux is $1.42\times10^{-11}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$
163: (0.4-8\,keV), corresponding to an unabsorbed X-ray luminosity of
164: $2\times10^{44}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
165: The spectral fit obtained is formally
166: unacceptable, with $\chi^{2}/{\rm dof}=686/544$
167: (dof=degrees of freedom) for a rejection probability
168: of $2.9\times10^{-5}$. This is due to several ionized emission and
169: absorption lines (e.g. from O, Ne) below 1 keV,
170: although the continuum is fitted well above 2 keV. A subsequent paper
171: will describe the soft X-ray spectrum of \PG\ obtained with the
172: LETG (Reeves et al. 2005, in preparation).
173:
174: In this paper we concentrate on the spectrum in the iron K band above 2 keV.
175: A single power-law model
176: provides an adequate fit to the continuum above 2 keV, with a photon index
177: of $\Gamma=1.99\pm0.06$. The fit statistic obtained
178: is $\chi^{2}/{\rm dof}=116.4/93$, which is marginally acceptable
179: (the rejection probability is $5\times10^{-2}$).
180: Figure 1 shows the LETG counts spectrum above 2 keV, the lower
181: panel showing the $\chi^{2}$ residuals of the data compared to the
182: continuum model. Each bin
183: represents the FWHM resolution of the LETG. Two strong negative deviations
184: that contribute significantly towards the total $\chi^{2}$
185: are observed near 4.2 and 4.9 keV, due to two absorption
186: lines in the \PG\ spectrum. To test this, two unresolved
187: ($\sigma=10$~eV) Gaussian absorption lines were added to the continuum model.
188: A significant improvement
189: in the spectral fit was obtained ($\chi^{2}/{\rm dof}=83.4/89$),
190: with addition of
191: two absorption lines at $4.22\pm0.03$~keV and $4.93\pm0.03$~keV (observed
192: frame) with equivalent widths of $35\pm16$~eV and $57\pm23$~eV.
193: %The absorption is apparent in both $\pm1$ orders of the LETG spectrum.
194: The improvement in fit statistic upon adding each line was
195: $\Delta\chi^{2}=13.8$ and $\Delta\chi^{2}=19.9$ respectively, while the
196: overall fit statistic is now acceptable.
197:
198: To constrain the width of the two absorption lines, the LETG spectrum
199: was rebinned to their maximum resolution, with each bin
200: representing 1/4 FWHM resolution of the LETG ($\Delta\lambda=0.0125$\,\AA\ or
201: $\Delta E=16$~eV at 4 keV). The rest-frame spectrum at this resolution
202: near the absorption lines is shown in Figure 2. The
203: spectral fit was minimized
204: using the C-statistic \citep{Cash79}, due to the lower number of
205: counts per bin at this resolution. The best fit width is $\sigma\sim21$\,eV
206: (at 4.9 keV), corresponding to a FWHM velocity of
207: $\sim3000$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. However the line width is poorly constrained,
208: the 90\% upper limit being $<7800$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
209: The variability of the absorption lines was tested by comparing the LETG
210: spectra across all three Chandra orbits. The first LETG orbit was
211: simultaneous
212: with XMM-Newton, so the LETG and EPIC-pn spectra were fitted jointly.
213: The results are shown in Table~1, while the C-statistic
214: was used to minimize the spectral fits.
215: The 4.2 and 4.9 keV lines are only formally
216: detected during the 2nd orbit, although orbits 2 and 3 are statistically
217: consistent. The lines do appear to vary in equivalent width between
218: orbits 1 and 2 at $>90\%$ confidence.
219: %although the photon statistics are limited because of the short exposures.
220:
221: %clearly detected during the 2nd Chandra orbit only.
222: %For instance the 90\% confidence limits on the line EW during orbit 1
223: %are $<25$~eV and $<21$~eV respectively.
224: %Interestingly an additional line at 6.38 keV (6.90 keV
225: %rest frame) is detected during the first observation only
226: %(with $\Delta\chi^{2}\sim20$). This is near the rest frame energy of
227: %H-like Fe K$\alpha$, suggesting the line energy (and thus
228: %velocity) of the absorption is variable.
229:
230: %The two lines appeared strongest during
231: %the 2nd Chandra orbit with EW=$54\pm24$~eV and $69\pm37$~eV, while in the
232: %last orbit these values are $28\pm19$~eV and $61\pm41$~eV. Thus while
233: %the last two Chandra orbits are consistent within the statistical errors,
234: %the absorption lines appear to have varied at $>90\%$ confidence between
235: %the first and second Chandra orbits.
236:
237: \subsection{Statistical Significance of the Absorption Lines}
238:
239: In order to check that the absorption is not due to calibration effects,
240: the \PG\ spectrum was compared to all the archived LETG observations of
241: 3C\,273.
242: %Figure 3 shows the comparison
243: %of the data/model residuals above 2 keV for the 3C\,273 and \PG\
244: %spectra, fitted to power-law continua of $\Gamma=1.71\pm0.01$ and
245: %$\Gamma=1.98\pm0.06$ respectively.
246: No residuals are present in the summed or individual 3C\,273 spectra
247: near the line
248: energies 4.22\,keV and 4.93\,keV (Figure 3). The limit on the equivalent
249: width of any absorption lines is $<4$~eV in the summed spectrum.
250: The source and background spectral extraction regions of \PG, in each of the
251: three Chandra orbits, were also inspected. No anomalous pixels or
252: rows were observed in the CCD array and no background sources were present
253: within the extraction regions. The separate $\pm1$ order spectra of \PG\
254: were also found to be consistent. Thus the lines are not due to systematic
255: or calibration effects in the LETG.
256: %Next the
257: %statistical significance of the lines are tested
258: %through Monte Carlo simulations.
259:
260: %Using the F-test to calculate the statistical
261: %significance of the redshifted lines in \PG\
262: %is incorrect as the line energies are not known a priori.
263: %The F-test does not take into account the
264: %number of possible bins (energies) where the lines may be located
265: %(see Porquet et al. 2004 for a similar discussion).
266:
267: In order to assess the statistical significance of the lines, we
268: wish to determine the chance probability of falsely detecting two
269: lines, over an energy band of interest. In order to estimate this, 1000
270: LETG spectra were simulated, under the null hypothesis assumption that
271: the spectrum consists of a broken power-law continuum from 0.4-8.0\,keV,
272: with no spectral lines.
273: The distribution of $\Delta\chi^{2}$ values obtained
274: by fitting a single Gaussian line to each of the 1000 spectra simulated in the
275: null hypothesis case can then be compared to the measured
276: $\Delta\chi^{2}$ in the real dataset to calculate the false
277: probability of detection \citep{Porquet04}.
278: The 1st order LETG spectra were simulated using identical
279: continuum parameters and exposure as in the real \PG\ dataset
280: and binned at the FWHM resolution of the LETG.
281: A single narrow Gaussian line (either in absorption or emission)
282: was added to the continuum
283: model and then fitted to each simulated spectrum.
284: The line energy was stepped in increments of one FWHM resolution bin
285: over the 3--7 keV band and the simulated spectrum was
286: re-fitted at each increment to minimize $\chi^{2}$.
287: The minimum $\chi^{2}$ obtained from adding the line to the spectral fit
288: was compared to the $\chi^{2}$ obtained for the continuum model alone
289: for each spectrum, in order to compute the distribution
290: of $\Delta\chi^{2}$ versus probability for all 1000 simulated spectra.
291: The 3--7 keV band was chosen for the line search as it is most likely
292: that a strong iron K$\alpha$ line will be observed over
293: this energy range; i.e. $<3$\,keV is outside
294: the iron K band-pass for any feasible redshift, while the LETG
295: has little effective area above 7 keV.
296: The improvement in fit statistic obtained for adding the two lines to the
297: actual dataset was $\Delta\chi^{2}=13.8$ and $\Delta\chi^{2}=19.9$
298: for each line. The simulations show that the
299: false probability of detecting a line with equal or greater
300: $\Delta\chi^{2}$ is 0.034 and 0.004 for the 4.2 and 4.9\,keV lines
301: respectively. The probability of both lines being false detections is the
302: product of these probabilities, which is $1.36\times10^{-4}$.
303:
304: As an independent check, we calculate the line significances using the
305: actual errors on the fitted parameters. The absorption line fluxes
306: at 4.2 and 4.9\,keV are
307: $-(4.9\pm1.3)\times10^{-6}$\,photons\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$ and
308: $-(5.9\pm1.5)\times10^{-6}$\,photons\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$ respectively,
309: while the continuum fluxes at these energies are
310: $1.40\pm0.10\times10^{-4}$\,photons\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,keV$^{-1}$
311: and $1.04\pm0.08\times10^{-4}$\,photons\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,keV$^{-1}$.
312: The equivalent widths of the lines are then $-35\pm10$\,eV and
313: $-57\pm15$\,eV respectively. The errors are $1\sigma$ values and the
314: line flux and continuum errors have been propogated. Thus the two
315: absorption lines are significant at $3.5\sigma$ and $3.8\sigma$, with
316: corresponding null probabilities of $4.6\times10^{-4}$ and
317: $1.4\times10^{-4}$. However these are single trial probabilities for
318: a line at an a-priori known energy. Taking into account the number of bins $N$
319: searched for line features in the 3-7 keV range, then the null detection
320: probability $P$ will be $P=1-(1-P_{1})^{N}$, where $P_{1}$ is the
321: single trial probability from above. As there are 48 resolution bins
322: in the 3-7 keV range, the null probabilities for the 4.2 and 4.9\,keV lines
323: are 0.022 and 0.0067 respectively, in excellent agreement with the
324: Monte-Carlo estimates.
325:
326: \section{Discussion}
327:
328: %We have demonstrated that the Chandra LETG spectrum of \PG\
329: %contains two strong absorption lines between 4-5 keV, which appear
330: %robust both statistically and to any systematic effects in the LETG.
331: %If the absorption lines are identified with iron K$\alpha$, then the
332: %redshifted velocities inferred are highly relativistic.
333:
334: Two absorption lines are observed at 4.22 and 4.93\,keV in the \PG\ LETG
335: spectrum, with a low probability that both are false detections.
336: Although the lines are likely to be associated with redshifted
337: Fe K$\alpha$, we first consider whether the lines
338: could originate from other elements at lower velocities.
339: The absorption line rest
340: frame energies are $4.56\pm0.03$~keV and $5.33\pm0.03$~keV.
341: The closest transitions
342: to those energies are Sc~\textsc{xxi} K$\alpha$ (at 4.53\,keV) or
343: V~\textsc{xxiii} (5.43\,keV) respectively. The
344: abundances of Sc or V are extremely low, $\sim1000\times$ less than Fe.
345: Even if the abundances of were enhanced through
346: spallation of iron nuclei by energetic protons
347: on the disk surface \citep{Skibo97}, the strengths of
348: these lines would still be considerably weaker
349: ($<<10\%$) than due to Fe K$\alpha$.
350: %The abundance of Ca is higher, approximately 5\%
351: %of iron (e.g. Anders \& Grevesse 1989), however it still seems implausible
352: %that the lines could be produced by Ca as lines from abundant elements
353: %(such as Si, S and Fe) should dominate the spectrum above 2 keV.
354: One other possibility is that the absorption originates
355: from lower Z elements such as Si, S or Ca in a
356: relativistic outflow. Blue-shifted lines with
357: $v\sim0.1c$ have been detected in \PG\ in a
358: previous XMM-Newton observation by \citet{Pounds03}. In this case
359: Ca~\textsc{xx} at 4.10 keV would appear the most reasonable
360: identification for the lower energy line, requiring an
361: outflow velocity of 32000\,km\,s$^{-1}$. However the
362: Ca~\textsc{xx} line is still likely to be weak, as the abundance ratio is
363: ${\rm Fe/Ca}\sim20$ \citep{Anders89}. Si or S are more abundant than Ca,
364: however if the lines originate from Si~\textsc{xiv} K$\alpha$ and
365: S~\textsc{xvi} K$\alpha$, then the
366: outflow velocities are 0.68c and 0.62c respectively. The
367: kinetic power of such a fast flow would be a factor of $\sim40$ greater
368: than calculated by \citet{Pounds03}, probably exceeding
369: $10^{46}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ and the bolometric output of the quasar.
370: Such a highly energetic flow seems implausible, unless the opening
371: angle of the outflow is small.
372:
373: The most likely scenario is that the lines originate from
374: highly redshifted iron K$\alpha$.
375: Indeed there have been a small number of previous
376: claims of redshifted Fe K absorption lines in other AGN. \citet{Nandra99}
377: first claimed the possibility of redshifted iron K-shell
378: absorption, through \asca\ observations of the Seyfert 1 NGC 3516.
379: However recent Chandra and XMM-Newton observations \citep{Turner02}
380: have showed that this is probably due to a strong narrow K$\alpha$
381: core at 6.4\,keV and variable emission lines at $<6.4$\,keV.
382: Other claimed examples include
383: a 6.2 keV line in the quasar
384: 1E\,1821+643 with Chandra HETG \citep{Yaqoob05} and a
385: weak redshifted line in the quasar Q 0056-363 \citep{Matt05}.
386: Most recently the detection of transient
387: redshifted Fe absorption lines in Mrk 509 was claimed in
388: Beppo-SAX data, with a velocity shift of $v=0.21c$
389: \citep{Dadina05}.
390: %intriguingly
391: %weak blue-shifted lines (with $v=0.16-0.19c)$
392: %were also claimed in certain observations of the same object.
393: %Our detection of strongly redshifted Fe absorption lines is
394: %probably the most statistical robust example to date,
395: %being verified through Monte Carlo
396: %simulations (rather than the F-test) at 99.99\% significance.
397:
398: If the lines in \PG\ correspond to H-like iron
399: (i.e. Fe~\textsc{xxvi} K$\alpha$ at 6.97 keV) then the
400: redshifted velocities are
401: 0.26c and 0.40c, while if the lines correspond to He-like iron
402: (Fe~\textsc{xxv} K$\alpha$ resonance at 6.70\,keV), the velocities are
403: 0.22c and 0.37c. Note that the separation of the two lines requires two
404: distinct velocity components, as the higher order Fe K$\beta$ lines are
405: undetectable in this spectrum. It is unlikely that the lines
406: result from a lower ionization than Fe~\textsc{xxv}, as then a series
407: of strong L-shell Fe lines and edges would be detected at
408: lower energies, which is not the case. Furthermore the absorption lines
409: cannot be from near neutral Fe (Fe~\textsc{i-xvii}) at 6.4 keV, because no
410: strong K$\alpha$ absorption line would be observed, as the L-shell would be
411: fully populated.
412:
413: The two possible causes for the relativistic shifts are
414: either gravitational redshift of photons
415: near the massive black hole or infall of matter onto the black hole. In the
416: former scenario, the absorbing matter would have to be located at
417: $3.5\pm0.5R_{\rm g}$ and $4.8\pm0.5R_{\rm g}$ respectively
418: from a Schwarzschild black hole (where $R_{\rm g}=GM/c^{2}$
419: is one gravitational radius). This is within
420: the last stable orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole and
421: requires a Kerr metric \citep{Thorne74} for the matter to exist in
422: a stable orbit within $6R_{\rm g}$. For a maximal pole-on Kerr black hole, the
423: radii derived are then $3.2R_{g}$ and $4.6R_{g}$
424: respectively. Alternatively, the matter may be infalling onto the
425: black hole, in which case a maximum velocity of $\sim0.38c$ (in
426: the frame of the observer) can be achieved at $6R_{\rm g}$ for a Schwarzschild
427: metric.
428: %In this case the observed redshift would arise due to a combination
429: %of gravitational redshift and kinematical inflow.
430:
431: Modeling the two absorption line
432: systems with Xstar \citep{Kallman96}, requires a large column density
433: of $N_{\rm H}=4.0^{+3.7}_{-1.9}\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$ (assuming a
434: turbulence of $\sigma_{\rm v}=1000$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and solar abundances).
435: The ionization parameter is log\,$\xi=3.9\pm0.3$~erg~cm~s$^{-1}$,
436: with most of the absorption arising from Fe~\textsc{xxvi} K$\alpha$.
437: The equivalent column density of Fe~\textsc{xxvi} is
438: $\sim7\times10^{18}$\,cm$^{-2}$, while the optical depth at the
439: K-shell edge is $\tau<0.1$, i.e. the matter is optically-thin to the
440: continuum. The velocity of the two absorption
441: systems are $v=(0.28\pm0.01)c$ and $v=(0.42\pm0.01)c$, while the
442: line of sight covering fraction is $>50$\%.
443: %Note that the column density
444: %required can be lower if the turbulence velocity is higher, e.g.
445: %for $\sigma_{\rm v}=3000$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, then
446: %log~$N_{\rm H}\sim10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$, which is an equally acceptable
447: %fit to the lines.
448: From the above parameters we can derive the physical
449: properties of the gas. A black hole mass of $4\times10^{7}$~\Msun\
450: is assumed \citep{Kaspi00}, an ionizing luminosity
451: of $L\sim10^{44}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ and a radial distance of
452: $R\sim10^{14}$\,cm (i.e.
453: a few $R_{\rm g}$).
454: %and an ionization parameter $\xi=10^{4}$~erg~cm~s$^{-1}$.
455: The ionization parameter is defined as $\xi=L/nR^{2}$ (n is the
456: electron density), while one can define a filling factor $f$ as
457: $f=\Delta R/R=N_{\rm H}/nR$. A
458: density of $n\sim10^{12}$\,cm$^{-3}$ is calculated,
459: with a filling factor of $\sim$1\% and a cloud size of
460: $\sim10^{12}$\,cm. Note that these should be considered
461: order of magnitude estimates, due to the uncertainties in $R$ and
462: black hole mass. The matter may be clumped, perhaps
463: from density perturbations on the disk or
464: from localized filaments within the infalling matter.
465:
466: A fast outflow of $\sim0.1c$ has already been detected in an earlier
467: XMM-Newton observation of \PG\ \citep{Pounds03} which is confirmed from the
468: analysis of the soft X-ray LETG data (Reeves et al. 2005, in preparation).
469: One possibility is that
470: part of this outflow does not escape the gravitational potential
471: of the black hole \citep{Murray98, Proga00}.
472: If material is launched with $v=0.1c$ in \PG, then
473: matter within a radius of $R<100R_{\rm g}$ may not escape the system.
474: Thus it is possible to produce
475: both red and blue-shifted lines in \PG, indeed in Mrk 509 both
476: inflow and outflow also appear to be present \citep{Dadina05}.
477: From above, the mass infall rate required is
478: $\dot{M} \sim \pi f nR^{2}vm_{\rm p} \sim \pi Lvf m_{\rm p}/\xi
479: \sim10^{25}$\,g\,s$^{-1}$
480: or $\sim0.1$\,\Msun\,yr$^{-1}$. The kinetic power is then a
481: few~$\times10^{44}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ for an infall velocity of $v=c/3$.
482: Interestingly this is similar to the X-ray luminosity of \PG.
483: Indeed a similar ``aborted jet'' model
484: has been proposed by \citet{Ghisellini04}, where matter in an outflow
485: or jet fails to escape the gravitational potential well.
486: The hard X-ray emission can be produced by shocks and collisions
487: within the flow.
488:
489: Alternatively the absorption may originate from matter
490: near the highly ionized inner disk
491: surface, with the redshift being largely gravitational in origin.
492: \citet{RF00} proposed such a model to explain the
493: absorption line in NGC 3516, although the lines will be broad
494: unless the matter is clumped.
495: %However it is not possible to firmly differentiate between this
496: %or the infall model with the current data.
497: Monitoring the line
498: variability will help to reveal its origin, for instance
499: it may possible to track the infall of a
500: dense clump of matter towards the black hole. This bodes
501: well for future longer observations of \PG, with XMM-Newton or Chandra,
502: to track the line variability. Regardless of the mechanism,
503: the large redshift and high covering fraction
504: imply that most of the X-ray emission
505: in \PG\ originates from a compact region within a few $R_{\rm g}$ of
506: the black hole.
507:
508: \clearpage
509:
510: \begin{thebibliography}{}
511: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{Anders89}
512: Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197
513:
514: \bibitem[Cash(1979)]{Cash79}
515: Cash, W. 1979, ApJ, 228, 939
516:
517: \bibitem[Dadina et al.(2005)]{Dadina05}
518: Dadina, M., Cappi, M., Malaguti, G., Ponti, G., \& De Rosa, A.
519: 2005, A\&A, in press
520:
521: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{Dickey90}
522: Dickey, J.M. \& Lockman, F.J., 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
523:
524: \bibitem[Dovciak et al.(2004)]{Dovciak04}
525: Dovciak, M., Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Karas, V., \& Matt, G. 2004,
526: MNRAS, 350, 745
527:
528: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(1989)]{Fabian89}
529: Fabian, A.C., Rees, M.J., Stella, L., \& White, N.E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729
530:
531: \bibitem[Ghisellini Haardt \& Matt(2004)]{Ghisellini04}
532: Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., \& Matt, G. 2004, A\&A, 413, 535
533:
534: \bibitem[Kallman et al.(1996)]{Kallman96}
535: Kallman, T.R., Liedahl, D., Osterheld, A., Goldstein, W., \& Kahn, S.
536: 1996, ApJ, 465, 994
537:
538: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2000)]{Kaspi00}
539: Kaspi, S., Smith, P.S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B.T., \&
540: Giveon, U. 2000, ApJ, 533, 631
541:
542: \bibitem[Laor(1991)]{Laor91}
543: Laor, A. 1991, ApJ, 376, L90
544:
545: \bibitem[Matt et al.(2005)]{Matt05}
546: Matt, G., Porquet, D., Bianchi, S., Falocco, S., Maiolino, R., Reeves, J.N.,
547: \& Zappacosta, L. 2005, A\&A, 435, 857
548:
549: \bibitem[Murray \& Chiang(1998)]{Murray98}
550: Murray, N., \& Chiang, J. 1998, ApJ, 494, 125
551:
552: \bibitem[Nandra et al.(1999)]{Nandra99}
553: Nandra, K., George, I.M., Mushotzky, R.F., Turner, T.J., \& Yaqoob, T.
554: 1999, ApJ, 523, L17
555:
556: \bibitem[Nandra et al.(1997)]{Nandra97}
557: Nandra, K., George, I.M., Mushotzky, R.F., Turner, T.J., \& Yaqoob, T.
558: 1997, ApJ, 477, 602
559:
560: \bibitem[Porquet et al.(2004)]{Porquet04}
561: Porquet, D., Reeves, J.N., Uttley, P., \& Turner, T.J. 2004, A\&A, 427, 101
562:
563: \bibitem[Pounds et al.(2003)]{Pounds03}
564: Pounds, K.A., Reeves, J.N., King, A., Page, K., O'Brien, P.T., \&
565: Turner, M.J.L. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 705
566:
567: \bibitem[Proga, Stone, \& Kallman(2000)]{Proga00}
568: Proga, D., Stone, J.M., \& Kallman, T.R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 686
569:
570: \bibitem[Reeves et al.(2004)]{Reeves04}
571: Reeves, J.N., Nandra, K., George, I.M., Pounds, K.A., Turner, T.J., \&
572: Yaqoob, T. 2004, \apj, 602, 648
573:
574: \bibitem[Ruszkowski \& Fabian(2000)]{RF00}
575: Ruszkowski, M., \& Fabian, A.C. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 223
576:
577: \bibitem[Skibo(1997)]{Skibo97}
578: Skibo, J.G. 1997, ApJ, 478, 522
579:
580: \bibitem[Tanaka et al.(1995)]{Tanaka95}
581: Tanaka, Y., et al. 1995, Nature, 375, 659
582:
583: \bibitem[Thorne(1974)]{Thorne74}
584: Thorne, K.S. 1974, ApJ, 191, 507
585:
586: %\bibitem[Turner, Stone \& Sano(2002)]{NTurner02}
587: %Turner, N.J., Stone, J.M., \& Sano, T. 2002, \apj, 566, 148
588:
589: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2005a)]{Turner05a}
590: Turner, T.J., Kraemer, S.B., George, I.M., Reeves, J.N., \& Bottorff, M.C.
591: 2005, \apj, 618, 155
592:
593: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2005b)]{Turner05b}
594: Turner, T.J., Miller, L., George, I.M., \& Reeves, J.N. 2005, A\&A, in press
595:
596: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2002)]{Turner02}
597: Turner, T.J., et al. 2002, \apj, 574, L123
598: %Turner, T.J., Mushotzky, R.F., Yaqoob, T., George, I.M., Snowden, S.L.,
599: %Netzer, H., Kraemer, S.B., Nandra, K. \& Chelouche, D. 2002, \apj, 574, L123
600:
601: \bibitem[Walter \& Fink(1993)]{Walter93}
602: Walter, R., \& Fink, H.H. 1993, A\&A, 274, 105
603:
604: \bibitem[Yaqoob \& Serlemitsos(2005)]{Yaqoob05}
605: Yaqoob, T., \& Serlemitsos, P. 2005, \apj, 623, 112
606:
607: \bibitem[Yaqoob \& Padmanabhan(2004)]{Yaqoob04}
608: Yaqoob, T., \& Padmanabhan, U. 2004, \apj, 604, 63
609:
610: \end{thebibliography}
611:
612: \clearpage
613:
614: \begin{figure}
615: \begin{center}
616: \rotatebox{-90}{
617: \epsscale{0.7}
618: \plotone{f1.ps}}
619: \caption{The upper panel shows the first order Chandra LETG spectrum of
620: PG 1211+143 above 2 keV; data points are shown as filled
621: circles and $1\sigma$ error bars as vertical lines. The best fitting
622: continuum model, folded through the LETG
623: response, is shown as a dashed line.
624: The spectrum has been binned to the FWHM LETG spectral resolution
625: and is plotted in the observed frame. The lower panel plots the
626: $\chi^{2}$ residuals between the data and the continuum model, negative
627: residuals correspond to a deficit of counts. Two
628: absorption features are apparent at 4.2 and 4.9 keV respectively.}
629: \end{center}
630: \end{figure}
631:
632: \clearpage
633:
634: \begin{figure}
635: \begin{center}
636: \rotatebox{-90}{
637: \epsscale{0.7}
638: \plotone{f2.ps}}
639: \caption{LETG spectrum of PG 1211+143 between 4-6 keV, binned at
640: the full LETG resolution of $\Delta\lambda=0.0125$~\AA\
641: (equivalent to 1/4 FWHM resolution per bin). Data are shown as filled circles,
642: with dashed lines showing the $1\sigma$ error bars and
643: the best fit absorption line model as a solid line. The spectrum has been
644: transformed into the rest frame of PG 1211+143. If identified with
645: Fe XXVI K$\alpha$, the redshift of each line would
646: correspond to velocities of 0.26c and 0.40c.
647: Note that the relative separation of the lines
648: requires that two separate velocity components are present.}
649: \end{center}
650: \end{figure}
651:
652: %\begin{figure}
653: %\begin{center}
654: %\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[height=14cm]{cstat1.ps}}
655: %\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[height=14cm]{cstat2.ps}}
656: %\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[height=14cm]{cstat3.ps}}
657: %\end{center}
658: %\caption{Chandra LETG observations of \PG, with the spectrum split into
659: %the 3 individual orbits of $\sim45$\,ks length. The histogram plotted in
660: %each panel shows the $\Delta C$ statistic residuals from a power-law
661: %continuum model fitted above 2 keV. The absorption lines at 4.2 and 4.9 keV
662: %are only formally detected in the second observation, suggesting that they
663: %are variable at about 90\% confidence.}
664: %\end{figure}
665:
666: \clearpage
667:
668: \begin{figure}
669: \begin{center}
670: \rotatebox{-90}{
671: \epsscale{0.7}
672: \plotone{f3.ps}}
673: \caption{Data/Model ratio residuals of the PG 1211+143 (circles)
674: and 3C 273 (stars) LETG spectra to power-law continuum models fitted
675: above 2 keV. The data were binned at the FWHM resolution of the LETG.
676: The absorption lines apparent between 4-5 keV in PG 1211+143 do not
677: appear in the 3C 273 spectrum, ruling out calibration effects.}
678: \end{center}
679: \end{figure}
680:
681: \clearpage
682:
683: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}\label{tab:line}
684: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
685: \tablecaption{Table of iron line spectral fits.}
686: \tablewidth{0pt}
687: \tablehead{
688: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Mean} & \colhead{Obs1} &
689: \colhead{Obs2} & \colhead{Obs3}}
690: %\colhead{$EW$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$R$\tablenotemark{g}} &
691: %\colhead{log\,$\xi$\tablenotemark{h}} & \colhead{$\chi^{2}/{\rm dof}$}}
692:
693: \startdata
694: %
695: Date\tablenotemark{a} & 21/06/2004 & 21/06/2004 &
696: 23/06/2004 & 25/06/2004 \\
697:
698: Time\tablenotemark{a} & 03:09:04 & 03:09:04 & 03:57:43 &18:30:27 \\
699:
700: Exposure\tablenotemark{b} & 133.6 & 42.7 & 48.2 & 42.7 \\
701:
702: $\Gamma$\tablenotemark{c} & $1.99\pm0.06$ & $1.87\pm0.14$ & $2.00\pm0.10$ &
703: $1.93\pm0.10$ \\
704:
705: F$_{2-10}$\tablenotemark{d} & 6.1 & 4.0 & 6.6 & 7.3 \\
706:
707: Energy\tablenotemark{e} & $4.22\pm0.03$ & 4.22\tablenotemark{f} &
708: $4.22\pm0.03$ & 4.22\tablenotemark{f} \\
709:
710: EW\tablenotemark{g} & $38\pm16$ & $<25$ & $54\pm24$ & $<46$ \\
711:
712: Energy\tablenotemark{e} & $4.93\pm0.03$ & 4.93\tablenotemark{f} &
713: $4.89\pm0.04$ & 4.93\tablenotemark{f} \\
714:
715: EW\tablenotemark{g} & $62\pm23$ & $<21$ & $69\pm37$ & $<57$ \\
716:
717: %Energy\tablenotemark{e} & -- & $6.38^{+0.14}_{-0.05}$ & -- & -- \\
718:
719: %EW\tablenotemark{g} & -- & $213^{+109}_{-89}$ & -- & -- \\
720:
721: \enddata
722:
723: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
724: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
725: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
726:
727: \tablenotetext{a}{Start date and time (in UT) for observation.}
728: \tablenotetext{b}{Exposure time in ks.}
729: \tablenotetext{c}{Photon index above 2 keV.}
730: \tablenotetext{d}{2-10 keV flux in units $10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.}
731: \tablenotetext{e}{Observed line energy in keV.}
732: \tablenotetext{f}{Denotes model parameter is fixed in fit.}
733: \tablenotetext{g}{Absorption line equivalent width in eV.}
734:
735: \end{deluxetable}
736: \end{document}
737:
738:
739:
740:
741:
742:
743:
744:
745:
746:
747:
748:
749:
750:
751:
752: