1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: % Local IspellDict: american
4:
5: %\slugcomment{Submitted to ApJL}
6: %\shorttitle{Origin of HVCs in MW}
7: %\shortauthors{Connors et al.}
8:
9: % citation short forms
10: %\defcitealias{bjd98}{BJD98}
11: %\defcitealias{kazantzidis-etal04}{K04}
12: %\defcitealias{bs05-alignment}{BS05}
13:
14: \listfiles
15:
16: %\newcommand{\eg}{{\rm e.g.}} %must call as \eg\ , otherwise latex will
17: %think the fullstop means a new sentence, and add too much space
18: %\newcommand{\ie}{{\rm i.e.}} %must call as \ie\ , otherwise latex will
19: %think the fullstop means a new sentence, and add too much space
20: %\newcommand{\etal}{{\rm et~al.}} %must call as \etal\ , otherwise latex will
21: %think the fullstop means a new sentence, and add too much space
22: \newcommand{\HI}{\ifmmode{\rm HI}\else{\mbox{H\,{\sc{i}}}}\fi}
23: \newcommand{\e}[1]{\ensuremath{\times 10^{#1}}}
24: \newcommand{\HII}{\mbox{H\,{\sc{ii}}}}
25: \newcommand{\OVI}{\mbox{O\,{\sc{vi}}}}
26: \newcommand{\msun}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,M}_{\sun}}}
27: \newcommand{\msunns}{\ensuremath{{\rm M}_{\sun}}}
28: \newcommand{\Zsun}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,Z}_{\sun}}}
29: \newcommand{\K}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,K}}}
30: \newcommand{\kms}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,km\,s}^{-1}}}
31: \newcommand{\cm}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,cm}^{-2}}}
32: \newcommand{\Gyr}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,Gyr}}}
33: \newcommand{\kpc}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,kpc}}}
34: \newcommand{\pc}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,pc}}}
35: \newcommand{\kpcns}{\ensuremath{{\rm kpc}}}
36: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,Mpc}}}
37: \newcommand{\Jykms}{\ensuremath{{\rm \,Jy\,\kms{}}}}
38: \newcommand{\Jykmsns}{\ensuremath{{\rm Jy\,\kms{}}}}
39: \newcommand{\vlsr}{\ensuremath{{v}_{\rm LSR}}}
40: \newcommand{\rvir}{{\ensuremath{r_{\mathrm{vir}}}}}
41: \newcommand{\Mvir}{{\ensuremath{M_{\mathrm{vir}}}}}
42: \newcommand{\rmw}{\ensuremath{r_{\rm \,MW}}}
43: \newcommand{\lstar}{\ensuremath{L_\star}}
44: \newcommand{\simgt}{\ensuremath{\ga}}
45: \newcommand{\simlt}{\ensuremath{\la}}
46:
47: \newcommand{\Fig}[1]{Figure~\ref{fig:#1}}
48: \newcommand{\Figs}[1]{Figures~\ref{fig:#1}}
49: \newcommand{\Tab}[1]{Table~\ref{tab:#1}}
50: \newcommand{\Sec}[1]{Section~\ref{sec:#1}}
51:
52: \newcommand{\codet}[1]{{\mbox{\sc#1}}}
53: \newcommand{\GCD}{{\codet{GCD+}}}
54: \newcommand{\galactICs}{\codet{GalactICs}}
55: \newcommand{\pview}{{\codet{PView}}}
56: \newcommand{\cloudy}{{\codet{Cloudy}}}
57:
58: \newcommand{\fixme}[1]{FIXME: {\it #1}}
59:
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: \title{
63: On the origin of anomalous velocity clouds in the Milky Way.
64: }
65: \shorttitle{Origin of HVCs in the MW}
66:
67: \author{
68: Tim W. Connors\altaffilmark{1},
69: Daisuke Kawata\altaffilmark{1,2},
70: Jeremy Bailin\altaffilmark{1},
71: Jason Tumlinson\altaffilmark{3},
72: Brad K. Gibson\altaffilmark{4}
73: }
74:
75: \altaffiltext{1}{Centre for Astrophysics \& Supercomputing,
76: Swinburne University, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia}
77: \altaffiltext{2}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,
78: 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA}
79: \altaffiltext{3}{Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics,
80: Department of Physics, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520, USA}
81: \altaffiltext{4}{Centre for Astrophysics, University of Central
82: Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom}
83: \shortauthors{Connors et al.}
84: \email{tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87: We report that neutral hydrogen (\HI{}) gas clouds, resembling High
88: Velocity Clouds (HVCs) observed in the Milky Way (MW), appear in
89: MW-sized disk galaxies formed in high-resolution Lambda Cold Dark
90: Matter ($\Lambda$CDM) cosmological simulations which include
91: gas-dynamics, radiative cooling, star formation, supernova feedback,
92: and metal enrichment. Two such disk galaxies are analyzed, and
93: \HI{} column density and velocity distributions in all-sky Aitoff
94: projections are constructed. The simulations demonstrate that
95: $\Lambda$CDM is able to create galaxies with sufficient numbers of
96: anomalous velocity gas clouds consistent with the HVCs observed
97: within the MW, and that they are found within a galactocentric
98: radius of $150 \kpc$. We also find that one of the galaxies has a
99: polar gas ring, with radius $30\kpc$, which appears as a large
100: structure of HVCs in the Aitoff projection. Such large structures
101: may share an origin similar to extended HVCs observed in the MW,
102: such as Complex~C.
103: \end{abstract}
104:
105: \keywords{
106: methods: N-body simulations --
107: galaxies: formation --
108: galaxies: ISM --
109: Galaxy: evolution --
110: Galaxy: halo --
111: ISM: kinematics and dynamics % --
112: % Local Group
113: }
114:
115: %*****************************************************************
116: \section{Introduction}
117: \label{sec:intro}
118:
119: High Velocity Clouds (HVCs) are neutral hydrogen (\HI{}) gas clouds
120: with velocities inconsistent with galactic rotation \citep{ww97}.
121: From our vantage point within the Galaxy, they appear to cover a large
122: portion of the sky relatively isotropically. HVCs do not appear to
123: possess a stellar component \citep[e.g.][]{sb02,smg+05} and their
124: distances (and masses) are generally unknown. Direct distance
125: constraints have only been made for a select number of HVCs
126: \citep{w01,tpg+06}. There are still open questions as to whether HVCs
127: are local to the Milky Way (MW) or distributed throughout the Local
128: Group (LG); whether they are peculiar to the MW or are common in disk
129: galaxies; whether they are gravitationally bound or pressure confined;
130: whether they contain Dark Matter (DM); and their degree of
131: metal-enrichment.
132:
133: \citet{pbg+04} report that there are no HVC-like objects with \HI{}
134: mass in excess of $4\e5\msun$ in three LG-analogs. They suggest that
135: if HVCs are a generic feature, they must be clustered within $160\kpc$
136: of the host galaxy, ruling out the original \citet{bst+99} model in
137: which HVCs are gas clouds distributed in filaments on Mpc-scales.
138: \citet{tbw+04} and \citet{wbt+05} find 16 HVCs around M31, with \HI{}
139: masses ranging from $10^4$ to $6\e5 \msun$. Most of the HVCs are at a
140: projected distance $< 15\kpc$ from the disk of M31. Some clouds
141: appear to be gravitationally dominated by either DM or as yet
142: undetected ionized gas. They also found two populations of clouds,
143: with some of the HVCs appearing to be part of a tidal stream, and
144: others appearing to be primordial DM dominated clouds, left over from
145: the formation of the LG. Finally, it has also been speculated that
146: cooling instabilities in Cold Dark Matter (CDM) halos could lead to
147: clouds within $150\kpc$ of MW type galaxies, with HVC-like properties
148: \citep{mb04}.
149:
150: In this {\it Letter}, we report that these mysterious \HI{} clouds
151: also appear in MW-size disk galaxies formed in $\Lambda$CDM
152: cosmological simulations. We demonstrate that the simulated galaxies
153: show HVCs comparable in population to the observed ones. We also find
154: that large HVCs resembling Complex~C appear in simulated galaxies.
155: Therefore, we conclude that HVCs appear to be a natural byproduct of
156: galaxy formation in the $\Lambda$CDM Universe. The next section
157: describes our methodology, including a brief description of the
158: simulations and how we ``observe'' the simulated disk galaxies. In
159: \Sec{results}, we show our results and discuss our findings.
160:
161: \section{Methodology}
162: \label{sec:methodology}
163:
164: We analyze two disk galaxy models found in cosmological simulations
165: that use the multi-mass technique to self-consistently model the
166: large-scale tidal field, while simulating the galactic disk at high
167: resolution. These simulations include self-consistently many of the
168: the important physical processes in galaxy formation, such as
169: self-gravity, hydrodynamics, radiative cooling, star formation,
170: supernova feedback, and metal enrichment. The disk galaxies we analyze
171: correspond to ``KGCD'' and ``AGCD'' in \citet{bkg+05}, and we use
172: these names hereafter. Both simulations are carried out with our
173: galactic chemodynamics package \GCD{} \citep{kg03a}.
174:
175: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrrrrrrrrr}
176: \tablecaption{
177: Properties of simulations
178: }
179: \tablewidth{0pt}
180: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} & \colhead{$\Mvir$} &
181: \colhead{$\rvir$} & \colhead{$r_{\rm{disk}}$} &
182: \colhead{$m_{\rm gas}$} & \colhead{$m_{\rm DM}$} &
183: \colhead{$e_{\rm gas}$} & \colhead{$e_{\rm DM}$} &
184: \colhead{$\Omega_0$} & \colhead{$h_0$} &
185: \colhead{$\Omega_b$} \\
186: & \colhead{$(\msunns)$} & \colhead{$(\kpcns)$} &
187: \colhead{$(\kpcns)$} & \colhead{$(\msunns)$} &
188: \colhead{$(\msunns)$} & \colhead{$(\kpcns)$} &
189: \colhead{$(\kpcns)$} & & & \\
190: }
191: \startdata
192: KGCD & $8.8\e{11}$ & 240 & 10 & $9.2\e5$ & $6.2\e6$ & 0.57 & 1.1 & 0.3 &
193: 0.7 & 0.039 \\
194: AGCD & $9.3\e{11}$ & 270 & 21 & $3.3\e6$ & $1.9\e7$ & 0.87 & 1.5 & 0.3 &
195: 0.65 & 0.045 \\
196: \enddata
197: \label{tab:params}
198: \end{deluxetable*}
199:
200: The details of these simulations are given in \citet{bkg+05}.
201: \Tab{params} summarizes the simulation parameters and the properties
202: of the galaxies. Column 1 is the galaxy name; Column 2, the virial
203: mass; Column 3, the virial radius; Column 4, the radial extent of the
204: gas disk, defined as the largest radius at which we find gas particles
205: in the disk plane. Columns 5 and 6 contain the mass of each gas and
206: DM particle in the highest resolution region, and Columns 7 and 8 are
207: the softening lengths in that region. The cosmological parameters are
208: presented in Columns 9--11. Note that the spatial resolution for the
209: gas is determined by the smoothing length of the smoothed particle
210: hydrodynamics scheme. The minimum smoothing length is set to be half
211: of the softening length of the gas particles (see \citealp{kg03a}).
212: The smoothing length depends on the density, and the average smoothing
213: length in the simulated HVCs we focus on here is $\sim 5 \kpc$.
214:
215: Both galaxies are similar in size and mass to the MW, and have clear
216: gas and stellar disk components. \Fig{gasdens} shows edge-on and
217: face-on views of the projected gas density of each galaxy at the final
218: timestep. We use the simulation output at $z=0.1$ for KGCD, as
219: contamination from low-resolution particles in the simulated galaxy
220: start to become significant at this redshift. We use the output at
221: $z=0$ for AGCD.
222:
223: \begin{figure}[t]
224: \epsscale{1.1}
225: \plotone{f1_jpg.eps}
226: \caption[\HI{} gas column density maps]{\HI{} gas column density
227: maps of KGCD (left set of 4 panels) and AGCD (right set)
228: simulations.}
229: \label{fig:gasdens}
230: \end{figure}
231:
232: In order to compare the simulations with the HVC observations in the
233: MW, we set the position of the ``observer'' to an arbitrary position
234: on the disk plane of the simulated galaxies, with galactocentric
235: distance of $8.5 \kpc$, and ``observe'' the \HI{} column density and
236: velocity of the gas particles from that position. \Fig{HI_mom0}
237: demonstrates the \HI{} column density of HVCs using all-sky Aitoff
238: projections. Here, we define HVCs as consisting of gas particles with
239: absolute lines-of-sight velocities, \vlsr{}, deviating from the Local
240: Standard of Rest (LSR) by more than $100 \kms$---\Fig{HI_mom0} shows
241: the \HI{} column density of these gas particles with $|\vlsr| >
242: 100\kms$. We set the rotation velocity of the LSR to $220 \kms$,
243: similar to that of the MW \citet{lmp+02}. We can confirm that both
244: simulated galaxies have gas disks rotating at $\sim 220 \kms$. In
245: this paper, results are based only on those particles within two
246: virial radii (\rvir; see \Tab{params}). We have also confirmed that
247: the results are not sensitive to the cutoff radius chosen for column
248: densities $N(\HI{}) \simgt 10^{17} \cm$. We only display results for
249: one chosen observer, however we have confirmed the generality of these
250: results, with the sky coverage fraction typically changing by no more
251: than 20\% for a given column density, as we change the observer's
252: position and/or we analyze other outputs of the simulation near the
253: final redshift.
254:
255: \begin{figure}[t]
256: \epsscale{1.1}
257: \plotone{f2a_jpg.eps}\\
258: \plotone{f2b_jpg.eps}
259: \caption[\HI{} column density maps]{\HI{} column density maps of KGCD
260: (top) and AGCD (bottom) simulations, in a all-sky Aitoff
261: projection in using galactic coordinates. Particles with $|\vlsr|
262: < 100\kms$ are excluded. Compare these maps with fig.~2 in
263: \citet{w91}.}
264: \label{fig:HI_mom0}
265: \end{figure}
266:
267: Our chemodynamical simulation follows the hydrogen and other elemental
268: abundances for each gas particle, but does not calculate the
269: ionization fraction of each species. Instead, the \HI{} mass for each
270: gas particle is calculated assuming collisional ionization equilibrium
271: (CIE). The CIE neutral hydrogen fraction is estimated using \cloudy94
272: \citep{fkv+98}. We multiply the fraction by the hydrogen abundance,
273: and obtain a \HI{} mass fraction for each particle as a function of
274: its temperature. We ignore any effect from the background radiation
275: field.
276:
277: \section{Results and discussion}
278: \label{sec:results}
279:
280: \Fig{HI_mom0} demonstrates that both galaxies have a significant
281: number of HVCs, with column densities comparable to those observed by
282: \citet{w91}. KGCD displays several large linear HVCs at galactic
283: longitudes $l \sim 60\degr$ and $l \sim 270\degr$. These components
284: correspond to the outer ring structure seen at a galactocentric radius
285: of $\sim 30 \kpc$ in \Fig{gasdens}. We name this structure the
286: ``polar gas ring'', and discuss it later.
287:
288: To compare the HVC population of our simulations with the MW HVCs
289: quantitatively, \Fig{hist_HI_skycov} shows the fraction of sky covered
290: by HVCs as a function of limiting column density for both simulations
291: and for the observations in \citet{lmp+02}. In this plot, we exclude
292: the area with low galactic latitude $|b| < 20\degr$, to avoid
293: contamination by the disk component (the sample of sightlines in
294: \citealp{lmp+02} was limited in a similar fashion). As is obvious
295: from \Fig{HI_mom0}, KGCD has more high column density HVCs than AGCD,
296: and almost all of the sky is covered down to $10^{16} \cm$. At a
297: fixed column density, the sky coverage in the simulations bracket the
298: observed sky coverage in the MW. Note that we ignore any effects of
299: background radiation. It is expected that such a field would decrease
300: the population of HVCs with Galactocentric distance less than $10
301: \kpc$ or $N(\HI{}) \simlt 10^{19} \cm$ \citep{m93,bm97,bm99}. Thus,
302: since as mentioned below, the distances of the simulated HVCs are
303: greater than $10 \kpc$, our estimated coverage fractions should be
304: interpreted as an upper limit for $N(\HI{}) \simlt 10^{19} \cm$, and a
305: lower limit for $N(\HI{}) \simgt 10^{19} \cm$, where the highest
306: column density HVCs may not be fully resolved. With these caveats,
307: KGCD appears to have a sufficient population of HVCs to explain the
308: observed population of HVCs within the MW. We conclude that current
309: cosmological simulations can produce MW-size disk galaxies with
310: similar populations of HVCs to those in the MW. The differences
311: between KGCD and AGCD may demonstrate real differences in the
312: populations of HVCs among disk galaxies. However, to understand the
313: causes of such differences, we need a larger sample of high-resolution
314: simulated disk galaxies, the subject of a future study.
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \epsscale{1.1}
318: \plotone{f3.eps}
319: \caption[\HI{} sky coverage fraction vs.\ limiting column
320: density]{\HI{} sky coverage fraction vs.\ limiting column
321: density. The dashed line denotes the sky coverage from the
322: \citet{lmp+02} HVC survey (excluding velocities \vlsr{} in the
323: range $\pm 100 \kms$, and with poor coverage of latitudes
324: $|b|<20\degr$) to the $4\sigma$ completeness limit. The sky
325: coverage obtained from the KGCD simulation is shown as a solid
326: line, and the dotted line denotes the AGCD simulation. }
327: \label{fig:hist_HI_skycov}
328: \end{figure}
329:
330: We find that velocities of the simulated HVCs seen in \Fig{HI_mom1},
331: are distributed similarly to those observed by \citet{pds+02}.
332: Overall, the clouds between $l=0\degr$ and $180\degr$ have a negative
333: velocity, while the clouds between $l=180\degr$ and $360\degr$ have a
334: positive velocity. This is natural, since the LSR is moving towards
335: $l=90\degr$. In KGCD, we find that there is a relatively large HVC
336: complex whose velocity is very high, $-450 \simlt \vlsr \simlt
337: -300\kms$. These very high velocity clouds (VHVCs) are located
338: between $-45\degr \simlt b \simlt 15\degr$ and $60\degr \simlt l
339: \simlt 120\degr$, in the top panel of \Fig{HI_mom1}. The MW also has
340: such VHVCs in the Anti-Center complex \citep{h78,hw88}. The
341: galactocentric distance to the VHVC in KGCD is $\sim 10$--$25\kpc$,
342: and we find that the cloud is a gas clump which has recently fallen
343: into the galaxy. We convert the \HI{} mass for each particle into a
344: \HI{} flux using $M_\HI = 0.235 D^2_{\rm kpc} S_{\rm tot}$
345: \citep{ww91}, where the \HI{} mass $M_\HI$ is in \msunns{}, total
346: \HI{} flux in \Jykmsns{} is $S_{\rm tot}$, and distance from observer
347: to the particle in \kpcns{} is $D_{\rm kpc}$. We find the \HI{} mass
348: of the VHVC complex is $1.2\e8 \msun$, and the total \HI{} flux (for
349: the chosen observer) is $2.5\e6 \Jykms$. Since it is
350: % see plots_of_interest: ./separatemovie.workerthread --masscolumn mzHgI --output columns noprint --outputfile /dev/null posselect.g000022.masses_hvcs/00\:chvc1.select.dat posselect.g000022.masses_hvcs/01\:chvc2.select.dat -- output/data/g000022.processed.OVI=min:0.rotdisk=090.vlim=100.wcstype=ait
351: infalling on a retrograde orbit, its velocity relative to the LSR
352: becomes very large depending on its location relative to the observer.
353: Therefore, the observed VHVCs may be explained by such infalling gas
354: clumps within the Galaxy. It is also worth noting that we do not find
355: any associated stellar or DM components in the simulated VHVCs.
356:
357: \begin{figure}
358: \epsscale{1.1}
359: \plotone{f4a_jpg.eps}\\
360: \plotone{f4b_jpg.eps}
361: \caption[\HI{} velocity map]{\HI{} first moment (column density
362: weighted mean velocity in the LSR) map of KGCD (top) and AGCD
363: (bottom) simulations. Particles with $|\vlsr| < 100\kms$ are
364: excluded. Compare these maps with fig.~16 in \citet{wss+03}.}
365: \label{fig:HI_mom1}
366: \end{figure}
367:
368: In the simulations, we are able to measure the distance of HVCs---data
369: which are not yet generally available for the real MW. In
370: \Fig{hist_HI_flux_dist}, we show a flux-weighted histogram of the
371: galactocentric distances, \rmw{}, of the high velocity gas particles
372: with $|b| > 20\degr$. In both simulations, less than 1\% of the \HI{}
373: flux visible in \Fig{HI_mom0} originates from HVCs with $\rmw
374: >150\kpc$. This is consistent with the aforementioned limits
375: established by \citet{pbg+04}.
376:
377: \begin{figure}
378: \epsscale{1.1}
379: \plotone{f5.eps}
380: \caption[\HI{} distance histogram]{\HI{} flux weighted histogram
381: with logarithmically spaced bins in distance (de-emphasing fluxes
382: from smaller galactocentric distances) of both AGCD and KGCD
383: simulations, excluding $|\vlsr{}| < 100 \kms$ and $|b|<20\degr$.}
384: \label{fig:hist_HI_flux_dist}
385: \end{figure}
386:
387: It is also clear that most of the emission in the KGCD simulation
388: results from the polar gas ring, whose radius is $\sim 30\kpc$. The
389: mass of this ring (including low velocity gas) is $3.6\e9 \msun$, of
390: which $2.3\e9 \msun$ is \HI{}. Although there is no prominent polar
391: % g000022.processed.rliml=20.rlimu=50.rotdisk=090.vlim=0.wcstype=ait
392: ring in AGCD, at larger distances, the flux distribution is found to
393: follow that of the KGCD simulation.
394:
395: \Fig{HI_mom0} demonstrates that the polar gas ring forms a linear high
396: velocity structure found in all quadrants of the sky. Large HVC
397: components, such as Complex~C and the Magellanic Stream, are well
398: known in our MW, and several authors \citep[e.g.][]{h88} argue that
399: the MW is surrounded by a polar gas ring. Neglecting the Magellanic
400: Stream, which has likely originated from the infalling Magellanic
401: clouds \citep{gn96, yn03, ckg05}, the largest HVC structure is
402: Complex~C. We measure the mass of the HVC ring in one quadrant as
403: $\sim 4\e8 \msun$. If we place Complex~C at a galactocentric distance
404: of
405: %awk '{printf "%5.5e\n", j+=$35}' quad-0-50kpc.dat | tail -n 1
406: $30 \kpc$ (only a lower limit has been obtained for its galactocentric
407: distance of $8.8\kpc$; \citealp{wps+99a}), its mass would be $\sim\
408: 1.5\e7 \msun$. Nevertheless, this indicates that there is enough
409: \HI{} gas to create such large observed HVCs in the simulated galaxy.
410: In KGCD, the polar gas ring is a relatively recently formed structure
411: that begins forming at redshift $z \sim 0.2$, and prior to this time,
412: the associated gas particles are found flowing inward along
413: filamentary structures. Thus, this simulated ring structure
414: demonstrates that current $\Lambda$CDM numerical simulations can
415: explain the existence of such large HVCs like Complex~C, as recently
416: accreted gas which rotates in a near-polar orbit. On the other hand,
417: AGCD does not show such a prominent large structure. This may
418: indicate that such HVC structures are not common in all disk galaxies.
419: Although this study focuses on only two simulated galaxies due to the
420: limit of our computational resources, more samples of high-resolution
421: simulated galaxies would elucidate how common such large structures
422: are, and what kind of evolution history is required to make such HVCs.
423:
424: We also analyze the metallicity of the simulated HVCs. In KGCD, we
425: find that the prominent HVCs have \HI{} flux weighted metallicities of
426: $-4 \simlt \log(Z/\Zsun) \simlt -2$ with a flux weighted mean of
427: $\log(Z/\Zsun) \sim -2.4$. This is much lower than the metallicities
428: of the observed HVCs in the MW, $-1 < \log(Z/Z\sun) < 0$ \citep{w01}.
429: The polar gas ring seen in KGCD has a metallicity of $-3 \simlt
430: \log(Z/Z\sun) \simlt 0.5$ with a mean of $\log(Z/\Zsun) \sim -1.7$,
431: which is lower than the observed metallicity of Complex~C,
432: $\log(Z/Z\sun) \sim -1$ \citep[e.g.][]{ggp+01,rsw+01}. Thus, our
433: numerical simulations seem to underestimate the metallicity of the
434: later infalling gas clouds. This is likely because we adopt a weak
435: supernova feedback model in our simulations. If we use a model with
436: strong feedback, more enriched gas is blown out from the system at
437: high redshift, which can enrich the inter-galactic medium which then
438: falls into galaxies at a later epoch.
439:
440: The majority of the simulated HVCs, including the polar gas ring, do
441: not have any obviously associated stellar or DM components, which is
442: consistent with current observations \citep{sb02,smg+05}. However, a
443: few compact HVCs are found to be associated with stellar components.
444: It would be interesting to estimate how bright they are, and if they
445: are detectable within the current observational limits.
446: Unfortunately, the resolution of the current simulations are too poor
447: to estimate the luminosity, and it is also likely that our simulations
448: produce too many stars due to our assumed minimal effect of supernova
449: feedback.
450:
451: The clouds in the simulation may be destroyed by effects that our
452: simulations are not able to reproduce accurately. The resolution and
453: nature of the SPH simulations make it difficult to resolve shocks
454: between the HVCs and the MW halo; however simple analytic estimates
455: show that there will not be strong shocking of the HVCs due to the low
456: density of the halo. \citet{is04}, using more detailed simulations,
457: argue that the Mach number of the HVCs are only $M_s \sim 1.2$--$1.5$,
458: marginally sufficient to form shocks, and heating the leading $\sim
459: 0.1 \pc$ of the HVC. \citet{qm01} show that the lifetime of such HVCs
460: in the presence of shocks is $\sim 1\Gyr$, long enough for our HVCs to
461: survive. \citet{mb04} discuss various physical processes, including
462: conduction, evaporation, ram-pressure drag, Jeans instabilities, and
463: Kelvin--Helmholtz instabilities that limit the mass ranges of stable
464: clouds. The most massive HVC apparent in our simulations is found to
465: be $1.5\e8\msun$, and the mass
466: %./separatemovie.workerthread --masscolumn mass --output columns noprint --outputfile /dev/null posselect.g000022.masses_hvcs/00\:chvc1.select.dat posselect.g000022.masses_hvcs/01\:chvc2.select.dat -- output/data/g000022.processed.OVI=min:0.rotdisk=090.vlim=100.wcstype=ait
467: resolution and hence smallest resolvable HVC in our simulations are
468: $\sim 10^6 \msun$; clouds of both extremes are clearly within the
469: stable mass ranges summarized in fig.~6 of \citet{mb04}. Therefore,
470: the simulated clouds are also expected to be stable.
471:
472: We report that HVCs seem to be a natural occurrence in a $\Lambda$CDM
473: Universe. We emphasize that the galaxies that result from our
474: simulations were not created specifically to reproduce the MW
475: exactly---they were selected for resimulation at higher resolution on
476: the basis of being disk-like \lstar{} galaxies. However, we have
477: serendipitously discovered that simulated galaxies that are similar in
478: size to the MW naturally contain \HI{} gas in the vicinity of the disk
479: that are similar to the anomalous velocity features seen in the MW.
480:
481: \acknowledgments
482:
483: TC thanks Stuart Gill for his \pview{} visualization tool source code
484: and Chris Power for useful advice. We acknowledge the Astronomical
485: Data Analysis Center of the National Astronomical Observatory, Japan
486: (project ID: wmn14a), the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science
487: of Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, and the Australian and
488: Victorian Partnerships for Advanced Computing, where the numerical
489: computations for this paper were performed. DK acknowledges the
490: financial support of the JSPS, through the Postdoctoral Fellowship for
491: research abroad. The financial support of the Australian Research
492: Council and the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council of the
493: United Kingdom is gratefully acknowledged.
494:
495: \bibliographystyle{apj}
496:
497: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
498: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
499:
500: \bibitem[{{Bailin} {et~al.}(2005)}]{bkg+05}
501: {Bailin}, J., {et~al.} 2005, \apjl, 627, L17
502:
503: \bibitem[{{Bland-Hawthorn} \& {Maloney}(1997)}]{bm97}
504: {Bland-Hawthorn}, J., \& {Maloney}, P.~R. 1997, Publications of the
505: Astronomical Society of Australia, 14, 59
506:
507: \bibitem[{{Bland-Hawthorn} \& {Maloney}(1999)}]{bm99}
508: ---. 1999, \apjl, 510, L33
509:
510: \bibitem[{{Blitz} {et~al.}(1999){Blitz}, {Spergel}, {Teuben}, {Hartmann}, \&
511: {Burton}}]{bst+99}
512: {Blitz}, L., {Spergel}, D.~N., {Teuben}, P.~J., {Hartmann}, D., \& {Burton},
513: W.~B. 1999, \apj, 514, 818
514:
515: \bibitem[{{Connors} {et~al.}(2005){Connors}, {Kawata}, \& {Gibson}}]{ckg05}
516: {Connors}, T.~W., {Kawata}, D., \& {Gibson}, B.~K. 2005, arXiv:astro-ph/0508390
517:
518: \bibitem[{{Ferland} {et~al.}(1998){Ferland}, {Korista}, {Verner}, {Ferguson},
519: {Kingdon}, \& {Verner}}]{fkv+98}
520: {Ferland}, G.~J., {Korista}, K.~T., {Verner}, D.~A., {Ferguson}, J.~W.,
521: {Kingdon}, J.~B., \& {Verner}, E.~M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
522:
523: \bibitem[{{Gardiner} \& {Noguchi}(1996)}]{gn96}
524: {Gardiner}, L.~T., \& {Noguchi}, M. 1996, \mnras, 278, 191
525:
526: \bibitem[{{Gibson} {et~al.}(2001){Gibson}, {Giroux}, {Penton}, {Stocke},
527: {Shull}, \& {Tumlinson}}]{ggp+01}
528: {Gibson}, B.~K., {Giroux}, M.~L., {Penton}, S.~V., {Stocke}, J.~T., {Shull},
529: J.~M., \& {Tumlinson}, J. 2001, \aj, 122, 3280
530:
531: \bibitem[{{Haud}(1988)}]{h88}
532: {Haud}, U. 1988, \aap, 198, 125
533:
534: \bibitem[{{Hulsbosch}(1978)}]{h78}
535: {Hulsbosch}, A.~N.~M. 1978, \aap, 66, L5
536:
537: \bibitem[{{Hulsbosch} \& {Wakker}(1988)}]{hw88}
538: {Hulsbosch}, A.~N.~M., \& {Wakker}, B.~P. 1988, \aaps, 75, 191
539:
540: \bibitem[{{Indebetouw} \& {Shull}(2004)}]{is04}
541: {Indebetouw}, R., \& {Shull}, J.~M. 2004, \apj, 605, 205
542:
543: \bibitem[{{Kawata} \& {Gibson}(2003)}]{kg03a}
544: {Kawata}, D., \& {Gibson}, B.~K. 2003, \mnras, 340, 908
545:
546: \bibitem[{{Lockman} {et~al.}(2002){Lockman}, {Murphy}, {Petty-Powell}, \&
547: {Urick}}]{lmp+02}
548: {Lockman}, F.~J., {Murphy}, E.~M., {Petty-Powell}, S., \& {Urick}, V.~J. 2002,
549: \apjs, 140, 331
550:
551: \bibitem[{{Maller} \& {Bullock}(2004)}]{mb04}
552: {Maller}, A.~H., \& {Bullock}, J.~S. 2004, \mnras, 355, 694
553:
554: \bibitem[{{Maloney}(1993)}]{m93}
555: {Maloney}, P. 1993, \apj, 414, 41
556:
557: \bibitem[{{Pisano} {et~al.}(2004){Pisano}, {Barnes}, {Gibson},
558: {Staveley-Smith}, {Freeman}, \& {Kilborn}}]{pbg+04}
559: {Pisano}, D.~J., {Barnes}, D.~G., {Gibson}, B.~K., {Staveley-Smith}, L.,
560: {Freeman}, K.~C., \& {Kilborn}, V.~A. 2004, \apjl, 610, L17
561:
562: \bibitem[{{Putman} {et~al.}(2002)}]{pds+02}
563: {Putman}, M.~E., {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 123, 873
564:
565: \bibitem[{{Quilis} \& {Moore}(2001)}]{qm01}
566: {Quilis}, V., \& {Moore}, B. 2001, \apjl, 555, L95
567:
568: \bibitem[{{Richter} {et~al.}(2001)}]{rsw+01}
569: {Richter}, P., {et~al.} 2001, \apj, 559, 318
570:
571: \bibitem[{{Siegel} {et~al.}(2005){Siegel}, {Majewski}, {Gallart}, {Sohn},
572: {Kunkel}, \& {Braun}}]{smg+05}
573: {Siegel}, M.~H., {Majewski}, S.~R., {Gallart}, C., {Sohn}, S.~T., {Kunkel},
574: W.~E., \& {Braun}, R. 2005, \apj, 623, 181
575:
576: \bibitem[{{Simon} \& {Blitz}(2002)}]{sb02}
577: {Simon}, J.~D., \& {Blitz}, L. 2002, \apj, 574, 726
578:
579: \bibitem[{{Thilker} {et~al.}(2004){Thilker}, {Braun}, {Walterbos}, {Corbelli},
580: {Lockman}, {Murphy}, \& {Maddalena}}]{tbw+04}
581: {Thilker}, D.~A., {Braun}, R., {Walterbos}, R.~A.~M., {Corbelli}, E.,
582: {Lockman}, F.~J., {Murphy}, E., \& {Maddalena}, R. 2004, \apjl, 601, L39
583:
584: \bibitem[{{Thom} {et~al.}(2006){Thom}, {Putman}, {Gibson}, {Christlieb},
585: {Flynn}, {Beers}, {Wilhelm}, \& {Lee}}]{tpg+06}
586: {Thom}, C., {Putman}, M.~E., {Gibson}, B.~K., {Christlieb}, N., {Flynn}, C.,
587: {Beers}, T.~C., {Wilhelm}, R., \& {Lee}, Y.~S. 2006, \apjl, 638, L97
588:
589: \bibitem[{{van Woerden} {et~al.}(1999){van Woerden}, {Peletier}, {Schwarz},
590: {Wakker}, \& {Kalberla}}]{wps+99a}
591: {van Woerden}, H., {Peletier}, R.~F., {Schwarz}, U.~J., {Wakker}, B.~P., \&
592: {Kalberla}, P.~M.~W. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 165: The Third Stromlo
593: Symposium: The Galactic Halo, 469--+
594:
595: \bibitem[{{Wakker}(1991)}]{w91}
596: {Wakker}, B.~P. 1991, \aap, 250, 499
597:
598: \bibitem[{{Wakker}(2001)}]{w01}
599: ---. 2001, \apjs, 136, 463
600:
601: \bibitem[{{Wakker} \& {van Woerden}(1991)}]{ww91}
602: {Wakker}, B.~P., \& {van Woerden}, H. 1991, \aap, 250, 509
603:
604: \bibitem[{{Wakker} \& {van Woerden}(1997)}]{ww97}
605: ---. 1997, \araa, 35, 217
606:
607: \bibitem[{{Wakker} {et~al.}(2003)}]{wss+03}
608: {Wakker}, B.~P., {et~al.} 2003, \apjs, 146, 1
609:
610: \bibitem[{{Westmeier} {et~al.}(2005){Westmeier}, {Braun}, \&
611: {Thilker}}]{wbt+05}
612: {Westmeier}, T., {Braun}, R., \& {Thilker}, D. 2005, \aap, 436, 101
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Yoshizawa} \& {Noguchi}(2003)}]{yn03}
615: {Yoshizawa}, A.~M., \& {Noguchi}, M. 2003, \mnras, 339, 1135
616:
617: \end{thebibliography}
618:
619: %\bibliography{ms}
620:
621: \end{document}
622: