1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4: \title{A Far Ultraviolet Study of the Old Nova V841 Oph}
5:
6: \author{Scott G. Engle and Edward M. Sion}
7: \affil{{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics}
8: \affil{Villanova University}
9: \affil{Villanova, PA 19085}
10: e-mail:scott.engle@villanova.edu
11: edward.sion@villanova.edu}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14:
15: We have carried out a synthetic spectral analysis of archival IUE spectra
16: of the old nova V841 Oph (Nova Oph 1848) taken 15 years apart. The spectra
17: reveal a rising continuum shortward of 1560\AA, a C {\sc iv} P-Cygni profile
18: indicative of wind outflow associated with disk accretion in one spectrum,
19: a deep Ly $\alpha$ profile, and strong N {\sc v} (1238\AA, 1242\AA) and O {\sc v}
20: (1371\AA) wind/coronal absorption lines. Numerous sharp interstellar
21: resonance lines are also present. A grid of high gravity atmospheres and
22: accretion disk models, spanning a wide range of inclinations, accretion
23: rates and white dwarf masses was compared to the de-reddened spectra. We
24: find that, for a steady state accretion disk model to account for the FUV
25: spectra, the accretion rate is only $\sim$3 $\times$ 10$^{-11}$
26: M$_{\sun}$/yr, 147 years after its outburst in 1848, with an implied
27: distance within $\sim$300 pc. The accretion
28: rate at 147 years post-outburst is smaller than expected for an old
29: nova.
30:
31: \end{abstract}
32:
33: \keywords{stars: old novae -- cataclysmic variables -- stars: individual (V841 Oph)}
34:
35: \section{Introduction}
36:
37: Cataclysmic variables are a diverse class of semi-detached, compact,
38: interacting binaries in which a white dwarf (WD) primary star accretes
39: matter from a gaseous disk formed by mass transfer from a Roche
40: lobe-filling main sequence secondary star. The classical novae and
41: recurrent novae are subclasses of CVs whose outbursts are due to explosive
42: thermonuclear burning on the surface of the White dwarf. A typical
43: outburst will produce a maximum increase in brightness of $\sim6-15$ mag
44: and release $10^{44}-10^{46}$ ergs. When taking into account the observed
45: frequency of classical nova outbursts and the observed CV space density,
46: we can infer a lower limit recurrence time for a given system to be
47: $\sim10^4-10^5$ yr. Thus the recurrence time is very short compared to the
48: lifetime of a CV so that CVs will experience many classical nova outbursts
49: in their lifetimes. The old novae and recurrent novae are the only CVs
50: that have recorded evidence of having undergone nova explosions.
51:
52: Among the old novae, DI Lac (Moyer et al. 2003) and V841 Ophiuchi are the
53: only such systems that have optical and UV spectra resembling the UX
54: UMa-type nova-like variables (Warner 1995 and references therein).
55: Emission line widths are very narrow, indicating a low inclination, as
56: first noted by Kraft (1964) and later confirmed by other studies. A low
57: inclination could explain why these two old novae have the highest optical
58: to X-ray flux ratios. We note however, that their optical spectra are
59: quite different (Hoard et al. 2000). The optical spectra of DI Lac reveal
60: broad, shallow Balmer and helium absorption lines with superimposed weak
61: emission lines, whereas V841 Oph reveals strong single-peaked Balmer, He
62: {\sc i} and He {\sc ii} emission features.
63:
64: The impetus for this work arises from the paucity of knowledge about
65: the white dwarfs and accretion disks in old
66: novae. How high are their accretion rates in the
67: post-nova state? Is there a correlation between the time since the nova
68: and the accretion rate in the old nova system? How quickly is an accretion
69: disk established following a nova explosion? How hot is the post-nova
70: white dwarf and how was it affected by the explosion? These basic
71: questions lack definitive answers and underscore the need for advancing
72: our knowledge of these systems. This is especially true in the FUV range
73: as shown in the recent analysis of the HST STIS spectrum of DI Lac (Moyer
74: et al. 2003).
75:
76: V841 Oph was discovered at the time of its outburst in 1848, as Nova Oph
77: 1848 and the early literature classified it as a fast nova. However, the
78: true maximum was very likely missed and hence the correct $t_{3}$ value
79: remains uncertain. This uncertainty in $t_{3}$ and its impact on the speed
80: class and distance estimates of V841 Oph is discussed in section 3.1
81: below. Its orbital period is 0.60144$\pm$0.00056 (Ritter and Kolb 1998).
82: The observed or estimated physical and orbital parameters published for
83: V841 Oph are listed in Table 1.
84:
85: Warner (1995) derives absolute magnitudes of CV subtypes and assigned
86: M$_V$ = +3.9 as an average for old novae as a class which, if due to
87: accretion, implies an accretion rate of 10$^{-8}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr. Warner
88: found a strong correlation between emission line equivalent widths and the
89: inclinations of the CV systems, as well as a strong correlation between
90: the inclination angle and the absolute magnitude. The systems having
91: higher inclination angles also had lower M$_V$ values than those that had
92: smaller inclination angles. Moreover, the systems that were nearly
93: pole-on, like DI Lac and V841 Oph, were found to have the highest M$_V$
94: values.
95:
96: \section{Far Ultraviolet Archival Observations}
97:
98: We extracted the archival spectra of V841 Oph from the IUE NEWSIPS final
99: archive. The observing log is given in Table 2 where we have listed, by
100: column: SWP image number, exposure time, starting time of the exposure,
101: the original program ID and the continuum and background counts. The
102: observations were made using the large aperture with the short-wavelength
103: prime camera (SWP) at low dispersion with a resolution of 5\AA, covering a
104: wavelength range of 1170-2000\AA.
105:
106: We carried out a flux calibration/correction to the IUE NEWSIPS spectra
107: using the Massa-Fitzpatrick correction algorithm to improve data quality
108: and signal-to-noise. Massa \& Fitzpatrick (2000) showed that the NEWSIPS
109: low-dispersion data had an absolute flux calibration that was inconsistent
110: with its own reference model and also subject to time-dependent systematic
111: effects which could, added together, amount to 10-15\%. Using our
112: corrected fluxes, we removed the effect of interstellar reddening by using
113: the IDL routine UNRED with E(B-V) = 0.50 (Verbunt 1997).
114:
115: The two spectra for V841 Oph were taken just over 15 years apart. However,
116: they are remarkably different from each other. The first spectrum has a
117: better signal-to-noise and a possible P Cygni profile in C {\sc iv} 1550\AA.
118: The more recent spectrum seems to have no discernable wind outflow, yet
119: also has flux levels marginally higher than the earlier spectrum. It
120: lacks a distinguishable P Cygni profile, and is generally noisier than the
121: earlier spectrum. The lower quality of the second spectrum is due largely
122: to the degradation of the SWP camera which marked the last few years of
123: IUE operations.
124:
125: Despite the noise level in both spectra, a few strong line features are
126: unambiguously identifiable. The strongest features in SWP07950 are the
127: broad Ly $\alpha$ absorption, the aforementioned C {\sc iv} (1550\AA)
128: absorption, N {\sc v} (1240\AA) absorption and Si {\sc iii} + O {\sc i}
129: (1300\AA) absorption are also evident. The peak to peak noise level in
130: SWP54455 preclude a clear identification of any line feature other than
131: the Ly $\alpha$ absorption, likely Si {\sc iii} + O {\sc i} (1300\AA)
132: absorption, and N {\sc v} (1240\AA) absorption. In both spectra, there is
133: a hint of Si {\sc iv} (1260\AA) absorption. However, it is somewhat puzzling
134: that Si {\sc ii} (1260\AA) is weak, if present at all, relative to the
135: prediction of a solar composition accretion disk (see below). This would
136: suggest the possibility that Si is underabundant relative to solar
137: composition. This is also suggested by the absence of Si {\sc iv} wind
138: absorption in the face of C {\sc iv} (1550) and N {\sc v} (1240\AA), all
139: three of which are typically seen together in cataclysmic variable wind
140: outflows. A similar underabundance of Si was seen in the analysis of the
141: HST STIS spectrum of DI Lac (Moyer et al. 2003).
142:
143: \section{Synthetic Spectral Modeling}
144:
145: The TLUSTY (Hubeny 1988) and SYNSPEC (Hubeny \& Lanz 1995) codes were used
146: to create model spectra of white dwarf stellar atmospheres. Solar
147: abundances were assumed. Wade \& Hubeny's (1998) optically thick disk
148: model grid was the source of model accretion disks. We then used IUEFIT,
149: which is a $\chi^{2}$ minimization routine, to calculate a $\chi^{2}$
150: value and a scale factor for each of our models.
151:
152: The scale factor S is defined in terms of the stellar radius R and distance
153: {\it d} by:
154:
155: F($\lambda_{obs}$) = S H($\lambda_{model}$)
156:
157: where S = 4($\pi$)(R$^2$/{\it d}$^2$).
158:
159:
160: The scale factor is normalized to one kiloparsec for the distance and one
161: solar radius for the radius. Thus, for a photosphere the distance {\it d} is
162: given by:
163:
164: {\it d} = 1000pc (R$_{wd}$/R$_{\sun}$)/ S$^{0.5}$.
165:
166:
167: Since the accretion disk model fluxes are normalized to a distance of
168: 100 pc, for an accretion disk fit, the distance is given by:
169:
170: {\it d} = 100/S$^{0.5}$pc.
171:
172: We also carried out combination fits utilizing both the best-fitting
173: accretion disk model and the best-fitting photosphere model. With this
174: fit, we were able to obtain the relative contributions of the accretion
175: disk and the white dwarf.
176:
177: The spectra were prepared for fitting by masking regions with negative
178: flux. For SWP54454 we masked 1190-1223\AA, along with 1787-1793\AA. For
179: SWP07950 we masked wavelengths $<$ 1228\AA, as well as 1925-1927\AA.
180:
181: First, we carried out accretion disk-only fits to the data. We ran models
182: with white dwarf masses of 0.350, 0.550, 0.800, 1.030 and 1.210 solar
183: masses. There was also a range of log $\dot{M}$ values from -8.0 up to
184: -10.5 in increments of 0.5. The disk inclination angle {\it i} was kept
185: fixed at 18$\degr$\ in all of the fits to be consistent with the evidence
186: that V841 Oph is a very low inclination system. The parameters of the
187: best-fitting accretion disk models are summarized in Table 3. For the same
188: white dwarf mass of 0.8 M$_\sun$, the best-fitting disk-only model to
189: SWP07950 is displayed in fig. 1 while the best-fitting disk model to SWP54454
190: is displayed in fig. 2. For a fixed white dwarf mass of 1.0 M$_\sun$, the
191: best-fitting disk-only models to SWP07950 and SWP54454 are displayed in
192: figs. 3 and 4, respectively. The best-fitting accretion disk models to
193: both spectra have the same accretion rate, $\sim$3$\times$10$^{-11}$
194: M$_\sun$/yr, and the scale factors of these best-fits place V841 Oph
195: within 200 pc of the sun.
196:
197: It is noteworthy that in both spectra, relative to the disk model fits,
198: the data show a broad ``bump'' centered at $\sim$1500\AA\ unaccounted for by the
199: model disk continuum. While this ``bump'' could be due to underlying
200: emission giving the appearence of a curved continuum in that region, we
201: believe that another possibility is more likely, namely that there is an
202: underlying high velocity component (an accretion belt on the white dwarf
203: or an optically thick inner disk/boundary layer ring in which the
204: Keplerian broadening of the wings of smeared absorption lines produces the
205: ``arched'' continuum in that region.) We have seen this in VW Hydri's white
206: dwarf spectrum during quiescence and regard it as a hallmark of such an
207: underlying high velocity component. If this is the case, then in V841 Oph,
208: the curvature of the continuum could be due to the merging of
209: Keplerian-broadened wings.
210:
211: Next, we applied white dwarf photosphere models. We found that our
212: best-fitting models to the two spectra were achieved with a temperature of
213: 18,000K-20,000K and log {\it g} = 8. For comparison with the disk fits, we
214: display the best-fitting photosphere model to SWP54454 in fig. 4 and the
215: best-fitting photosphere model to SWP07950 in fig. 5.
216:
217: We also combined the best-fitting white dwarf photosphere fluxes with the
218: best-fitting accretion disks fluxes, varying the disk fluxes by a small
219: increment between 0.1 and 10 until a best combination fit was achieved
220: (see Winter and Sion (2003) for the details of this technique).
221: The resulting best-fitting photosphere plus disk fit to the two
222: spectra yielded distances of 260 pc for SWP07950, and 258 pc for
223: SWP54454, which are both close to the more recently published values by
224: Warner (1987). Combined models showed an overwhelming contribution from
225: the disk itself, with 94\% of the SWP07950 flux, and 94\% of the
226: SWP54454 flux coming from the accretion disk.
227:
228: Although we fixed the inclination of V841 Oph at 18$\degr$ and adopted
229: 0.8 M$_{\sun}$ and 1.0 M$_{\sun}$ as the most likely white dwarf masses in our
230: accretion disk model, we extended our fits to encompass the range of
231: probable white dwarf masses and orbital inclinations derived by Diaz and
232: Ribeiro (2003) based upon probability calculations in their radial
233: velocity study. If we adopt an inclination as high as 60$\degr$, then for
234: a white dwarf mass of 0.8 M$_{\sun}$, we find that the best-fitting accretion
235: disk model has an accretion rate of 3 x 10$^{-10}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr and a
236: scale factor-derived distance of 283 pc. If we adopt a white dwarf mass of
237: 0.35 M$_{\sun}$, which lies close to the lower end of the Diaz and Ribeiro
238: (2003) mass range, then we obtain a best-fitting disk model with an
239: accretion rate of 1 x 10$^{-9}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr and a model-derived distance
240: of 229 pc. While we believe that a white dwarf mass
241: this small would imply a helium-rich core, low ejection velocities and
242: extremely long nova recurrence timescales, recent hydrodynamic simulations
243: of classical novae extended to lower white dwarf masses and very low accretion
244: rates do indeed result in nova events (Yaron et al. 2005).
245: In the final analysis, all of our accretion disk model
246: fits imply that the distance to V841 Oph is below 300 pc.
247:
248: \subsection{The Distance to V841 Oph}
249:
250: The distance implied by our model fitting is considerably closer than one
251: typically associates with old novae. In fact, classical novae are often
252: found at larger distances than other CV types at least in part because
253: they are discovered during their bright outbursts (i.e., it is influenced
254: by an observational selection effect). In view of the cyclical
255: (hibernation) evolution scenario for CVs, it should not be surprising to
256: find novae at distances comparable to a ``typical'' CV (i.e., a few hundred
257: pc). Given that V841 Oph is located in the direction of the Galactic
258: bulge where novae typically are at larger distances, the distance we have
259: derived for V841 Oph would be puzzling. However, it cannot be ruled out
260: that V841 Oph is simply a disk object that lies between the sun and the
261: center of the Galaxy.
262:
263: The early literature classified V841 Oph as a fast nova. If the true
264: maximum was missed, then the nova was brighter and the parameter $t_{3}$
265: smaller. A smaller $t_{3}$ indicates an intrinsically brighter nova.
266: Payne-Gaposchkin (1957) pointed out the difficulty of reducing the
267: different observations to a consistent light curve and that the true
268: maximum, which she thought was near +2, was missed. After combining this
269: information with that of Pickering (1900), based on observations by
270: F.W.A. Argelander, the first observation of a magnitude of +5.0 is 9 days
271: later than Payne-Gaposchkin's approximate maximum. If the Pickering
272: magnitudes are reliable, this suggests a $t_{3}$ value of about 12 days.
273: Using the magnitude-rate of decline relationship (Downes and Duerbeck,
274: 2000) for a light curve of type B (Duerbeck, 1981), leads to an absolute
275: magnitude of -7.5. The fast nova relationship leads to an absolute
276: magnitude of -9.6. An absorption in V of 1.60 (Gilmozzi et al. 1994) from
277: fitting the UV continuum, then gives corresponding distances of 380 and
278: 1000 pc, respectively. The lower value is closer to our determination of
279: 190 pc. On the other hand, Sherrington and Jameson (1983), by fitting the
280: infrared to include the contribution of the cool component, find a
281: distance between 336 and 301 pc.
282:
283: Since the true speed class of V841 Oph is uncertain due to different
284: estimates of $t_{3}$, it is worth exploring a slow nova relationship for
285: maximum magnitude (Woronsow-Weljaminow 1953; Duerbeck 1981). In this case,
286: the implied distance is $>$ 370 pc for a $t_{3}$ value of 23 days.
287: Duerbeck (1987) gives an apparent maximum of +4.2 and a $t_{3}$ value of 130
288: days. For the same interstellar absorption, the corresponding Downes and
289: Duerbeck (2000) relation gives an absolute magnitude of -6.9. The distance
290: then is 790 pc. Warner (1987) gives an absolute magnitude at maximum of
291: -6.5 for a maximum apparent magnitude of +4. His absorption is $A_{v}$ =
292: 1.25 and the distance obtained is 710 pc. Gilmozzi et al (1994) compiled
293: various sources of maximum magnitude-rate of decline relationships and
294: $t_{3}$ obtaining a distance of 680 pc. We have summarized the various
295: estimates of $t_{3}$, speed class and distances in Table 4.
296:
297: What do we make of all of this? Certainly the correct
298: empirically-determined distance to V841 Oph remains unclear. While old
299: novae tend to be much more distant than what we have derived for it, there
300: are old novae which are comparably as close, those being V603 Aql (238 pc
301: from a Hipparcos parallax), DQ Her (327 pc), and HR Del (285 pc), the
302: latter two from Warner (1987). We are encouraged that our model-derived
303: distance is close to the distance range estimated by Sherrington and
304: Jameson (1983). Our distance for V841 Oph is also reinforced by the HST
305: STIS study of the old nova DI Lac (Moyer et al. 2003) which is almost a
306: spectroscopic twin of V841 Oph. While the accretion rate is higher in DI
307: Lac (Nova Lac 1910) by a factor of 10 to 30 compared with V841 Oph (Moyer
308: et al. 2003), the distance implied by the scale factor of the best-fitting
309: accretion disk models in that study (after correcting a normalization
310: error) are in the range of 199 to 292 pc. If our model-derived distance
311: is incorrect, then there may be something wrong with using steady state
312: accretion disk models for old novae like V841 Oph and DI Lac or there are
313: missing pieces of physics in the accretion disk models we have used.
314:
315: \section{Summary}
316:
317: The two spectra of V841 Oph, taken 15 years apart, reveal a difference in
318: flux level with the later one having a higher flux level but no evident P
319: Cygni profile structure. The latter could be due to orbital
320: phase-dependent changes in the profile structure rather than a shutdown of
321: the outflow. Our synthetic spectral analysis of V841 Oph with model
322: accretion disks and photospheres reveals that the FUV spectrum is
323: completely dominated by an optically thick, steady state disk. This is no
324: surprise. However, since previous observational evidence supports a low
325: inclination and high intrinsic luminosity for the system, it is surprising
326: that the best-fitting steady state accretion disk implies an accretion
327: rate of $\sim$3 $\times$ 10$^{-11}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr. This is at least two
328: orders of magnitude lower than the accretion rate one typically associates
329: with old novae based upon their average absolute magnitudes, and lower
330: than the typical accretion rates derived for nova-like variables such as
331: IX Vel and RW Sex. While the nova-like variables have had no recorded
332: outburst, the IUE spectra of V841 Oph and DI Lac were observed 132 years
333: and 76 years after their classical nova explosions. Therefore, if our
334: accretion rates are correct, then their post-nova accretion rates, roughly
335: a century after their nova episodes, have declined significantly to levels
336: below the rates associated with the high states of VY Scl-type nova-like
337: variables. ($>$ 1 kpc).
338:
339: It is clear that further FUV spectroscopic observations and distance
340: determinations from parallaxes are needed to confirm the results suggested
341: by our archival study.
342:
343: \acknowledgements
344:
345: A portion of this manuscript was prepared during a visit by one of us
346: (EMS) at the Institut d'Astrophysique, in Paris. We are grateful to
347: Michael Friedjung for useful discussions on the distances of old novae.
348: We thank an anonymous referee for a number of useful comments.
349: This research was supported by NASA ADP grant NNG04GE78G, in part by
350: NSF grant AST05-07514 and by summer
351: research funding from the NASA-Delaware Space Grant Consortium.
352:
353: \begin{thebibliography}{}
354: \bibitem[Bruch \& Engel (1994)]{BruchEngel1994} Bruch, A. \& Engel, A. 1994, A\&AS, 104, 79
355:
356: \bibitem[Diaz \& Ribeiro (2003)]{DiazRibeiro2003} Diaz, M.P. \& Ribeiro,
357: F.M.A. 2003, AJ, 125, 3359
358:
359: \bibitem[Downes and Duerbeck (2000)]{DownesDuerbeck2000} Downes, R. \&
360: Duerbeck, H. 2000, ApJ, 120, 2007
361:
362: \bibitem[Duerbeck (1981)]{Duerbeck1981} Duerbeck, H. 1981, PASP, 93, 165
363:
364: \bibitem[Duerbeck (1987)]{Duerbeck1987} Duerbeck, H. 1987, Space Science
365: Reviews, 45, 1
366:
367: \bibitem[Friedjung et al. (1988)]{Friedjung1988} Friedjung, M., Bianchini, A. \& Sabbadin, F. 1988, The Messenger, No.52, 49
368:
369: \bibitem[Gaposchkin, C.P.(1957)]{Gaposchkin1957} Gaposchkin, C.P. Galactic Novae, (New York, Dover).
370:
371: \bibitem[Gilmozzi, R. et al. (1994)]{Gilmozzi1994} Gilmozzi et al. 1994, Mem. S.A.It. p.199
372:
373: \bibitem[Hoard et al. (2000)]{Hoard2000} Hoard, D.W. et al. 2000, PASP, 112, 1595
374:
375: \bibitem[Hoard et al. (2002)]{Hoard2002} Hoard, D.W. et al. 2002, \apj, 565, 511
376:
377: \bibitem[Hubeny (1988)]{Hubeny1988} Hubeny, I. 1988, Comput. Phys. Comm., 52, 103
378:
379: \bibitem[Hubeny \& Lanz (1995)]{HubenyLanz1995} Hubeny, I. \& Lanz, T. 1995, \apj, 439, 875
380:
381: \bibitem[Kraft (1964)]{Kraft1964} Kraft, R. 1964, \apj, 139, 457
382:
383: \bibitem[Massa \& Fitzpatrick (2000)]{MassaFitzpatrick2000} Massa, D. \& Fitzpatrick, E.L. 2000, ApJS, 126, 517
384:
385: \bibitem[Moyer et al. (2003)]{Moyer2003} Moyer, E. et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 288
386:
387: \bibitem[Pickering (1900)]{Pickering1900} Pickering, E.C. 1900, Harvard Annals 33 no 4
388:
389: \bibitem[Shara et al. (1989)]{Shara1989} Shara, M., Potter, M. \& Shara, D.J. 1989, PASP, 101, 985
390:
391: \bibitem[Sherrington \& Jameson (1983)]{SherringtonJameson1983} Sherrington, M.R. \& Jameson, R.F. 1983, MNRAS, 205, 265
392:
393: \bibitem[Sion (1999)]{Sion1999} Sion, E.M. 1999, PASP, 111, 532
394:
395: \bibitem[Verbunt (1997)]{Verbunt1997} Verbunt, F. 1997, A\&A, 327, 602
396:
397: \bibitem[Wade \& Hubeny (1998)]{WadeHubeny1998} Wade, R.A. \& Hubeny, I. 1998, \apj, 509, 350
398:
399: \bibitem[Warner (1995)]{Warner1995} Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, (Cambridge, GB: Cambridge
400: University Press)
401:
402: \bibitem[Warner (1987)]{Warner1987} Warner, B. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 23
403:
404: \bibitem[Winter \& Sion (2003)]{WinterSion2003} Winter, L., \& Sion,
405: E.M.2003, ApJ, 582, 352
406:
407: \bibitem[Woronsow-Jelyaminow (1953)]{Woronsow-Jelyaminow1953}
408: Woronsow-Jelyaminow, B.A., Gasnebel und Neue Sterne (Berlin: Kultur und
409: Fortschritt).
410:
411: \bibitem[Yaron et al. (2005)]{Yaron 2005} Yaron et al.2005, ApJ, 623, 398
412: \end{thebibliography}
413:
414: %% Figures %%
415:
416: \clearpage
417:
418:
419: \begin{figure}
420: \epsscale{0.8}\plotone{fg1.eps}
421: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
422: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP07950 shown with the best-fit
423: accretion disk model with $\dot{M} = 10^{-10.5}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr, $i =
424: 18$\degr\, and M$_{wd} = 0.80$ M$_{\sun}$.}
425: \end{figure}
426:
427: \clearpage
428:
429: \begin{figure}
430: \epsscale{0.8}\plotone{fg2.eps}
431: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
432: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP54454 shown with the best-fit
433: accretion disk model with $\dot{M} = 10^{-10.5}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr, $i =
434: 18$\degr\, and M$_{wd} = 0.80$ M$_{\sun}$.}
435: \end{figure}
436:
437: \clearpage
438:
439: \begin{figure}
440: \epsscale{0.8}\plotone{fg3.eps}
441: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
442: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP07950 shown with the best-fit
443: accretion disk model with $\dot{M} = 10^{-10.5}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr, $i =
444: 18$\degr\, and M$_{wd} = 1.0$ M$_{\sun}$.}
445: \end{figure}
446:
447: \clearpage
448:
449: \begin{figure}
450: \plotone{fg4.eps}
451: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
452: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP54454 shown with
453: the best-fit accretion disk model with $\dot{M} =
454: 10^{-10.5}$ M$_{\sun}$/yr, $i = 18$\degr\, and M$_{wd} = 1.0$ M$_{\sun}$.}
455: \end{figure}
456:
457: \clearpage
458:
459: \begin{figure}
460: \plotone{fg5.eps}
461: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
462: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP54454 shown with the best-fitting
463: high gravity (log $g = 8$) model with T$_{eff} = 18,000$ K.}
464: \end{figure}
465:
466: \clearpage
467:
468: \begin{figure}
469: \plotone{fg6.eps}
470: \caption{Plot of Flux f$_{\lambda}$ (ergs/s/cm$^{2}$/\AA) versus
471: wavelength (\AA) for IUE spectrum SWP07950 shown with the best-fitting
472: high gravity (log $g = 8$) model with T$_{eff} = 20,000$ K.}
473: \end{figure}
474:
475:
476: \clearpage
477:
478:
479: \begin{deluxetable}{cc}
480: \tablewidth{0pc}
481: \tablecaption{\sc Parameters of V841 Oph}
482: \startdata
483: \hline
484: system & V841 Oph\\
485: log P [{\it days}] & -0.219\tablenotemark{a}\\
486: {\it i}[\degr] & $\sim$0\tablenotemark{b}\\
487: M$_V$* & 3.9\\
488: M$_{WD}$ & 1?\\
489: log $\dot{M}$ & -8.03\\
490: \enddata
491: \tablerefs{
492: (a) \citealt{Hoard2002};(b) \citet{Warner1995}\\
493: ** Corrected for inclination effects}
494: \end{deluxetable}
495:
496:
497:
498:
499: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
500: %\tablewidth{0pc}
501: \tablecaption{\sc IUE Observing Log}
502: \tablehead{
503: \colhead{Data}&\colhead{t$_{exp}$}&\colhead{Dispersion}&\colhead{Aperture}&\colhead{Date of Exposure}&\colhead{Cont. Cts}&\colhead{Back. Cts}}
504: \startdata
505: SWP54454 & 3600 & LOW & LARGE & 1995-04-17 19:41:00 & 122 & 77\\
506: SWP07950 & 7200 & LOW & LARGE & 1980-02-14 20:54:00 & 92 & 34\\
507: \enddata
508: \end{deluxetable}
509:
510: \clearpage
511:
512: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
513: \tablewidth{0pc}
514: \tablecaption{\sc Accretion Disk Fitting Parameters}
515: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter}&\colhead{SWP54454}&\colhead{SWP07950}}
516: \startdata
517:
518: M$_{WD}$(M$_{\sun}$) & 0.8 & 1.0\\
519: {\it i}\degr\ & 18 & 18\\
520: $\dot{M}$(M$_{\sun}$/yr) & -10.5 & -10.5\\
521: $\chi^2$& 1.49179 & 2.48270\\
522: S & 0.712911 & 0.266539\\
523: {\it d} & 188 & 194\\
524: \enddata
525: \end{deluxetable}
526:
527: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
528: \tablewidth{0pc}
529: \tablecaption{\sc V841 Oph Distance Estimates}
530: \tablehead{\colhead{Source}&\colhead{$t_{3}$ ({\emph d})}
531: &\colhead{{\emph d}(\emph pc)}}
532: \startdata
533:
534: Downes and Duerbeck (2000) & $\sim$12 & 380 (Type B Light Curve)\\
535: Fast Nova $t_{3}$ Relationship & $\sim$12 & 1000 \\
536: Sherrington and Jameson (1983) & -- & 301--336 \\
537: Slow Nova $t_{3}$ Relationship & 23 & $>$370 \\
538: Duerbeck (1981) & 130 & 790 \\
539: Warner (1987) & -- & 710 \\
540: Gilmozzi et al (1994) & -- & 680 \\
541: \enddata
542: \end{deluxetable}
543:
544: \clearpage
545:
546: \end{document}
547:
548:
549: