1: %%%%%%This vesion is modified by S.O.+B.Cz+D.B.C.(final version June 20, 2005)
2: %%%%%% PLEASE DO NOT MAKE CORRECTION WITHOUT AGREEMENT WITH HIM
3: %%%%%% SHOULD BE PRINTER in THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETT. <======
4: % \documentclass{aastex}
5: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
6: % \documentclass[preprint]{,}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10: %%\DeclareOption{draft}{\setlength\overfullrull{5pt}}
11:
12: \input epsf.sty
13:
14:
15: \shorttitle{Very short gamma-ray bursts}
16: \shortauthors{Cline et al.}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \bibliographystyle{plain}
20: %\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
21:
22: \title{Study of Very Short GRB: New Results from BATSE and KONUS.
23: % Draft - version for 18 May 2005.
24: }
25:
26: \author{D.B. Cline\altaffilmark{1}, B. Czerny\altaffilmark{2},
27: C. Matthey\altaffilmark{1}, A. Janiuk\altaffilmark{2},
28: S. Otwinowski\altaffilmark{1}}
29: %\affil{University of California Los Angeles, Department of Physics and
30: %Astronomy, Box 951447, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547, USA}
31: %\email{stanislaw.otwinowski@cern.ch}
32: %\affil{Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18,
33: % 00-716 Warsaw, Poland}
34: %\email{agnes@camk.edu.pl; bcz@camk.edu.pl}
35: \altaffiltext{1}{University of California Los Angeles, Department of Physics and
36: Astronomy, Box 951447, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547, USA; e-mail: stanislaw.otwinowski@cern.ch}
37: %\email{stanislaw.otwinowski@cern.ch}
38: \altaffiltext{2}{Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18,
39: 00-716 Warsaw, Poland}
40: %\email{agnes@camk.edu.pl; bcz@camk.edu.pl}
41:
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: Our recent studies of Very Short Gamma Ray Bursts (VSB) of duration $T_{90} \le 100$ ms
45: have indicated a significant angular asymmetry and a uniform $V/V_{max}$ distribution from
46: the BATSE data.
47: Here we update these studies, and we extend our research to events observed with KONUS
48: satellite which gives a new insight into the spectra not possible with the BATSE data.
49: KONUS has observed 18 events with $T_{90} \le 100$ ms duration.
50: These events display considerable numbers of photons with energies
51: above 1 MeV and have photons above 5 MeV in all cases. These appear to
52: be some of the most energetic photons observed from any classes of GRB
53: to date.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts}
57:
58: \section{INTRODUCTION}
59:
60: % The study of Gamma Ray Bursts is of wide spread interest.
61: The Long Bursts ($T_{90} > 2$ s) are known to originate at
62: cosmological distances
63: with many identified counterparts
64: and they are widely believed to be related to the collapse of massive stars
65: \citep{vanpar97,metz97,fish92}.
66: %%out out out out -----------------
67: %%Relatively little is known about the nature of
68: %%the Short Bursts ($T_{90} < 2$ s)
69: %%\cite{ghir04,nakar02,maglio03,fred03,ram00}.
70: %%For this reason
71: %%new new new new -----------------
72: Considerable information about the short bursts can be found
73: \citep{ghir04,nakar02,maglio03,fred03,ram00}
74: including the very interesting
75: possibility that the long and short bursts come from the same
76: sources \citep{ghir04}. SWIFT results seem to indicate the merger scenario
77: \citep{berger05} but
78: further study of short bursts is necessary.
79: In this letter we discuss the properties of the Very Short Bursts ($T_{90} \le 100$ ms;
80: hereafter VSB).
81: %%We have carried out a systematic study of the Very Short
82: %%Bursts, those with $T_{90} \le 100$ ms.
83: We have found some unusual aspects of these events including:
84:
85: a) Very hard photon spectra compared to longer duration GRBs.
86:
87: b) A significant angular asymmetry on the Galactic Plane.
88:
89: c) A $<V/V_{max}>$ value consistent with 1/2.
90:
91: In this paper we update the results of \cite{cline99,cline00,cline03}
92: including new events.
93: We also analyze the VSB observed with the KONUS detector
94: that have been recently reported \citep{konuscat}.
95: Sensitivity of KONUS detector above 1 MeV allows to draw firm conclusions
96: on the
97: hard part of the VSB spectra.
98: %These events confirm a hard photon spectra including the observation
99: %of some of the highest energy photons so far observed in GRBs.
100: %All events display photon energies above 5 MeV.
101: Data analysis is given in Section 2 (BATSE results) and Section 3 (KONUS results), and the results are discussed in Section 4.
102: % We belive these results provide more characteristics of these
103: %VSB and possible sources.
104:
105: \section{FURTHER STUDY OF THE BATSE DATA}
106:
107: We use the data from the BATSE Current Gamma-Ray Burst
108: Catalog
109: \citep{batsecurrent}.
110: It contains the following data base:
111: Basic (2702 events - last update Sep. 9, 2000),
112: Duration (2041 events - last update Aug.17, 2000),
113: CMAX/CMIN (1318 events - last update Aug. 1, 2003).
114: The subsample of Short Bursts (hereafter SB),
115: with $0.1$ s $ \le T_{90} < 2$ s , consists
116: of 448 bursts. There are 51 bursts that have $T_{90} \le 0.1 $ s, and they
117: form our subsample of VSB.
118: We note that there has been evidence for an anisotropy in the SB
119: from a previous study \citep{maglio03}.
120:
121: \subsection{Anisotropic distribution of the VSB}
122:
123: The angular distribution of VSB and SB in Galactic Coordinates is shown in
124: Fig. 1. The sky was divided
125: into 8 equal regions.
126: In the case of isotropic distribution the number of bursts
127: in each region should
128: be described by the Poisson distribution. The histograms of such values are
129: shown in Fig. 1. The probability
130: of any number of bursts in a single zone multiplied by the number of zones (8)
131: is shown with full circles.
132: For 448 SB ($0.1$ s $\le T_{90} < 2$ s) we see conformity with
133: isotropic distribution, but for VSB ($T_{90} \le 0.1$ s)
134: the observed distribution is strongly improbable for isotropic distribution.
135: The number of bursts in one of the regions (roughly in the direction of the
136: Galactic Anticenter) is 20, which is much higher than the expected average
137: of 51/8.
138: The probability to find twenty or more
139: events (from the total number of fifty one) in the region of 1/8 area is 0.00007.
140: This result argues for other explanation than the statistical fluctuation.
141: Background in the direction of the Galactic Center is $12 500 \pm 1000$
142: cts~s$^{-1}$,
143: while the mean level of the background outside the region is
144: $13 800 \pm 1300$ cts~s$^{-1}$, and the total number of SB in this regions is slightly lower than the expected average (but within
145: the expected error). Therefore, background anisotropy cannot
146: be responsible for the observed distribution of the VSB across the sky.
147:
148:
149: We support the choice of $T_{90}$ = 0.1 s to discriminate VSB from SB
150: with the following consideration.
151: In Fig.2 we show the distribution of the excess number
152: of the GRBs as
153: a function of $T_{90}$. The excess from the isotropic distribution is
154: calculated as a difference between
155: the GRBs number in the chosen region
156: and the sum of all GRBs
157: number in other
158: regions divided by seven. This study shows that
159: the incompatibility with isotropic distribution is seen only for GRBs with
160: $T_{90} \le 0.1$ s. We observe the total excess of $15.71 \pm 4.52$ bursts
161: in this region.
162:
163: \subsection{\textbf{$<V/V_{max}>$} test of radial distribution}
164:
165: We have also reanalyzed the overall radial distribution of the VSB and
166: the SB using the standard $<V/V_{max}>$ test
167: \citep{schmdt88}.
168: We use the CMAX/CMIN table from BATSE catalog as an input for $V/V_{max}$
169: calculations:
170: $V/V_{max}$ = $(C/C_{min})^{-3/2}$
171: and we follow the standard algorithm given in \cite{batsecurrent}. Eight
172: events in
173: the table CMAX/CMIN have all values lower than the accepted trigger.
174: We can either reject these events, or attribute them the value
175: close to the detection threshold
176: ($V/V_{\rm max}$ $\approx$ 0.9).
177: The choice does not affect significantly the measured value of $V/V_{max}$
178: (see Table~\ref{tab0}).
179:
180: The result of $V/V_{max}$ distributions and mean values are presented
181: in Fig. 3. SB appear to come from cosmological distances
182: given the $V/V_{max}$ distribution we see
183: since this is
184: similar to the distribution for the Long GRBs.
185: No cosmological effects are seen in the
186: distribution of VSB.
187:
188: \section{STUDY OF THE VSB FROM THE KONUS SAMPLE}
189:
190: In Table~\ref{tab1} are listed the candidates for VSB from
191: KONUS - 18 events!
192: This is approximately what would be expected from the relative KONUS
193: and BATSE exposure and confirms that the BATSE events are real. In the case,
194: when the same event (the same time of registration) was observed in both
195: KONUS and BATSE experiments both $T_{90}$ values are shown in Table~\ref{tab1}
196: \citep{konuscat}.
197: Independent detections by satellites other than KONUS are also marked, including
198: the trigger number
199: (B-BATSE, U-Ulysses, N-NEAR). We accept as VSB events where no other significant
200: maximum (above background) appears within 30 seconds after the trigger.
201:
202:
203: The KONUS detector has a significantly larger energy acceptance
204: out to tens of MeV.
205: The BATSE detector has a smaller NaI absorber and is not sensitive to
206: 1-10 MeV photons.
207: Therefore the KONUS detector offers the first chance to measure higher
208: energy photons from VSB.
209: However, there are no corresponding coordinates
210: for the KONUS events as in the case of BATSE. We therefore
211: use the KONUS data mainly for spectral information.
212:
213: All VSB show appreciable number of photons above 1 MeV energy.
214: This follows the trend observed in the BATSE data that the VSB events
215: have a hard energy spectrum.
216: All events also show gamma rays above 5 MeV.
217: In Fig.4 we compare the mean energy of SB and
218: VSB for KONUS events.
219: We observe that in the MeV region the spectra of VSB are significantly harder
220: than the spectra of SB. The spectra start to be flatter above 3 MeV and
221: the effect in the case of VSB is again stronger.
222:
223: \section{DISCUSSION}
224:
225: This extended analysis of the BATSE data and the results of the KONUS
226: detector continue to suggest that the VSB events form a separate class
227: of events from the SB.
228: Strong anisotropy and $<V/V_{\rm max}>=0.5$ consistent with Euclidean space
229: strongly argue
230: for the local origin of this phenomenon. Spectra of VSB are very hard,
231: supporting the
232: claim that a different mechanism is here at work.
233:
234:
235:
236: Detected counterparts of Long Bursts at other wavelengths established the
237: relation of those events to the massive star collapse; no such support was
238: available for SBs \citep{zhang04}. Therefore,
239: several possibilities for the origin of this class of bursts were
240: proposed, e.g. \cite{cline03}.
241: This includes neutron star mergers \citep{good87,dar99} and neutron star collapse
242: to strange-quark stars \citep{dar99}.
243: There were also suggestions that the nature of Long and Short Bursts is
244: the same \citep{yama04} although SB are on average harder
245: \citep{kouv93,ghir04}, have $<V/V_{\rm max}>$ closer to 1 and show traces of
246: anisotropy \cite{maglio03}.
247: VSBs are extreme examples being still harder and showing even more
248: spectacular anisotropy, clearly indicating towards the local origin of
249: this class of events.
250:
251: Primordial black hole evaporation, as an explanation of the existence of
252: the VSB class, is also possible (for details, see \cite{cline2000}).
253: The energy expected from such
254: phenomenon is of order of $M_*c^2$, and the currently evaporating black
255: holes have
256: masses $M_* \sim 10^{15}$ g
257: \citep{carr,becken}.
258: Such energy, if converted with an efficiency
259: $f_{\gamma}$ into the form of $\gamma$-rays
260: collimated in a solid angle $\Omega$, would give the observed fluence
261: $F = 8 \times 10^{-9}f_{\gamma}({M_* \over 10^{15}{\rm g}})
262: ({1 {\rm kpc} \over D})^2 ({4 \pi \over \Omega}) ~~~ {\rm [erg~cm^{-2}]}$.
263: The weakest VSB (see Table~\ref{tab1}) can come from distances of $\sim 300$ pc if uncollimated,
264: and from further out if some collimation is involved. However, less standard
265: approach to primordial black hole mass evaporation gives much broader range of
266: numbers
267: \citep{send05}.
268:
269: We also note that there is some confusion between the Short GRB and the SGR
270: super flares \citep{hur05}. However, the very hard spectrum of the VSB
271: would seem to separate those types of events.
272:
273: Plausible detection of X-ray afterglows \citep{fred03}, and recent
274: claims of the identification
275: of a host galaxy for two SB Swift bursts \citep{bloom05,berger05} might
276: point toward merger scenario. One of the localized bursts (GRB~050724)
277: is a typical
278: SB ($T_{90} \sim 0.26$ s). The other one (GRB~050509b) is intermediate between
279: a VSB and a SB. Its Galactic Coordinate is not in the excess region
280: of Fig 1a and the limited energy acceptance of Swift does not allow
281: a test of the presence of MeV photons to compare with other VSB
282: studied here. More SWIFT data may clear the issue.
283:
284: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
285:
286: In this paper we have provided a new analysis of the most recent VSB
287: events from BATSE. We have also studied the VSB from KONUS for the
288: first time. We show that the GRBs with time duration below 100 ms
289: appear to form a separate class of GRBs. The KONUS data show that these
290: events have a very hard photon spectrum up to 10 MeV - this effect was
291: already hinted in the BATSE hardness data. The events appear to originate
292: nearby within the Galaxy as the asymmetry plot (Fig. 1.a) and
293: the $V/V_{max}$ distribution (Fig. 2.a) indicate.
294: This effect is statistically significant. In previous studies of this subject, we have suggested that such events could come from
295: Primordial Black Hole evaporation
296: \citep{cline03}, with supplementary details in
297: \cite{cline2000}. The other local sources such as neutron stars should also be
298: candidates.
299:
300:
301:
302: {\it Acknowledgments.}
303: This work
304: was supported in part by grants 2P03D00322 and PBZ-KBN-054/P03/2001.
305: We thank the referee for information on Short Burst studies.
306:
307: \begin{thebibliography}{}
308:
309: \bibitem[BATSE Catalog(2003)]{batsecurrent} BATSE GRB Team. Responsible Manager Frank Six. The BATSE Current Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog http://f64.nsstc.nasa.gov/batse/grb/catalog/current/
310:
311: \bibitem[Beckenstein(2004)]{becken} Beckenstein, J.D. 2004, astro-ph/0407560
312:
313: \bibitem[Berger et al.(2005)]{berger05} Berger, E., et al. 2005, astro-ph/0508115
314:
315: \bibitem[Bloom et al. (2005)]{bloom05} Bloom, J.S. et al. 2005, astro-ph/0505480
316:
317: \bibitem[Carr(2003)]{carr} Carr, B. 2003, Lect. Notes Phys., 631, 301, also astro-ph/0310838
318:
319: \bibitem[Cline et al.(1999)]{cline99} Cline, D.B., Matthey, C., \& Otwinowski, S. 1999, ApJ, 527, 827
320:
321: \bibitem[Cline(2000)]{cline2000} Cline, D.B. 2000, UCLA-APH-0132-12/00, astro-ph/0103137
322:
323: \bibitem[Cline et al.(2001)]{cline00} Cline, D.B., Matthey, C., \& Otwinowski,
324: S. 2001, in Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era Proceedings of the International workshop held in Rome CNR headquarters 17-20 October 2000, eds. Enrico Costa Filippo Frontera and Jens Hjorth (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer), 56
325:
326: \bibitem[Cline et al.(2003)]{cline03} Cline, D.B., Matthey, C., \& Otwinowski, S. 2003, Aph, 18, 531
327:
328: \bibitem[Dar(1999)]{dar99} Dar, A. 1999, A\&AS, 138, 505
329:
330: \bibitem[Fishman(1994)]{fish92} Fishman, G.J., et al. 1994, ApJS, 92, 229
331:
332: \bibitem[Frederiks et al.(2003)]{fred03} Frederiks, D.D. et al. 2003, talk presented at Rome 2002 GRB Conference, astro-ph/0301318
333:
334: \bibitem[Ghirlanda et al.(2004)]{ghir04} Ghirlanda, G., Ghisellini, G., \& Celotti, A. 2004, A\&A, 422, L55
335:
336: \bibitem[Goodman et al.(1987)]{good87} Goodman, J., Dar, A., \& Nussinov, S. 1987, ApJ, 314, L7
337:
338: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2005)]{hur05} Hurley, K. et al. 2005, astro-ph/0502329
339:
340: \bibitem[KONUS catalog,~Mazets at al.(2002)]{konuscat} Mazets, E.A., at al., Konus catalog of short GRBs, http://www.ioffe.ru//LEA/shortGRBs/Catalog/ astro-ph/0209219
341:
342: \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al.(1993)]{kouv93} Kouveliotou, C., et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, L101
343:
344: \bibitem[Magliocchetti et al.(2003)]{maglio03} Magliocchetti, M., Ghirlanda, G., \& Celotti, A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 255
345:
346: \bibitem[Metzger et al.(1997)]{metz97} Metzger, M.R., et al. 1997, Nature, 387, 879
347:
348: \bibitem[Nakar and Piran(2002)]{nakar02} Nakar, E. \& Piran, T. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 920
349:
350: \bibitem[Ramirez-Ruiz and Fenimore(2000)]{ram00} Ramirez-Ruiz, E., \& Fenimore, E.E. 2000, ApJ, 539, 712
351:
352: \bibitem[Sendouda et al.(2005)]{send05} Sendouda, Y., et al. 2005, Phys.Rev. D, 71, 063512, also astro-ph/0408369
353:
354: \bibitem[Schmidt et al.(1988)]{schmdt88} Schmidt, M., Higdon, J.C., \& Hueter, G. 1988, ApJ, 329, L85
355:
356: \bibitem[van Paradijs et al.(1997)]{vanpar97} van Paradijs, J., et al. 1997, Nature, 386, 686
357:
358: \bibitem[Zhang and Meszaros(2004)]{zhang04} Zhang, B., \& Meszaros, P. 2004, J.Mod.Phys. A, 19, 2385
359:
360: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al.(2004)]{yama04} Yamazaki, R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 607, L103
361:
362: \end{thebibliography}
363:
364: \clearpage
365:
366: %Fig. 1
367:
368: \begin{figure}[!h]
369: \centering
370: \epsfxsize = 120 mm \epsfbox{f1.eps}
371: %\begin{center}
372: \caption{Angular distribution of the GRBs in Galactic Coordinates
373: and the corresponding histograms, in comparison
374: with Poisson distribution predictions for two different $T_{90}$ ranges
375: (full circles).}
376: %\end{center}
377: \label{Fig.1}
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: \clearpage
381:
382: %Fig. 2.
383:
384: \begin{figure}[!h]
385: %\begin{figure}[t]
386: \centering
387: \epsfxsize = 130 mm \epsfbox{f2.eps}
388: \caption{The excess in the GRBs number inside the chosen region in the
389: Galactic Plane (see Fig. 1)
390: as a function of $T_{90}$.}
391: \label{Fig.2}
392: \end{figure}
393:
394: \clearpage
395:
396: %Fig.3.
397: \begin{figure}[!h]
398: \centering
399: \epsfxsize = 150 mm \epsfbox{f3.eps}
400: \centering
401: \caption{Distribution of the $V/V_{max}$ for BATSE events.}
402: \label{Fig.3}
403: \end{figure}
404:
405: \clearpage
406:
407: %Fig. 4.
408:
409: \begin{figure}[!h]
410: \centering
411: \epsfxsize = 150 mm \epsfbox{f4.eps}
412: \caption{Mean Energy distribution for KONUS Short and Very Short Bursts.}
413: \label{Fig.4}
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \clearpage
417:
418: \begin{table}
419: \begin{center}
420: \caption{The influence of the uncertain BATSE detections on the measured $<V/V_{\rm max}>$
421: }
422: \label{tab0}
423:
424: \begin{tabular}{rccc}
425: \tableline
426: \tableline
427: $C/C_{\rm min}$ $<$ 1 & VSB & SB & $T_{90}$ $>$ 2 s \\
428: \tableline
429: rejected events & 0.48 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
430: accepted events & 0.52 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.36 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
431: \tableline
432: \end{tabular}
433: \end{center}
434: \end{table}
435:
436: \clearpage
437:
438: \begin{table}
439: \begin{center}
440: \caption{List of KONUS GRBs with $T_{90} \le 0.1$ s.}
441: \label{tab1}
442: \end{center}
443: \begin{center}
444: \begin{tabular}{rlcccccc}
445:
446: \tableline
447: \tableline
448: NN & Burst & $T_{90}$ [s] & Peak Flux &Fluence &Energy & Location& $T_{90}$ [s] \\
449: &Name & (KONUS) & erg ${{\rm cm}^{-2}}$ ${{\rm s}^{-1}}$ &erg ${{\rm cm}^{-2}}$ &Interval keV & & (BATSE)\\
450:
451: \tableline
452: 110 & 010420a & 0.01 & 1.2e--005 & 2.3e--007 &15-1000 & -& -\\
453: 32 & 970625a & 0.03 & 3.8e--005 & 9.4e--007 &15-3000 & -& - \\
454: 18 & 960803 & 0.05 & 2.1e--005 & 8.9e--007 &15-5000 & B(tr.5561)& 0.10\\
455: 57 & 980904 & 0.05 & 3.5e--005 & 1.3e--006 &15-2000 & B(tr.7063)& 0.13\\
456: 27 & 970427 & 0.06 & 1.0e--005 & 3.9e--007 &15-1000 & B(tr.6211)& 0.07\\
457: 37 & 970921 & 0.06 & 1.0e--004 & 4.5e--006 &15-8000 & -& -\\
458: 79 & 970427 & 0.06 & 1.0e--005 & 3.9e--007 &15-1000 & -& -\\
459: 6 & 950610b & 0.07 & 1.6e--005 & 7.1e--007 &15-1000 & -& -\\
460: 75 & 990504 & 0.08 & 1.5e--005 & 1.2e--006 &15-2000 & -& -\\
461: 83 & 990831 & 0.08 & 5.9e--006 & 3.8e--007 &15-1000 & -& -\\
462: 40 & 971118 & 0.08 & 2.7e--006 & 1.7e--007 &15-1000 & B(tr.6486)& 0.07\\
463: 86 & 991226b & 0.08 & 7.7e--006 & 3.9e--007 &15-1000 & -& -\\
464: 117 & 020116 & 0.08 & - & - & - & -& -\\
465: 34 & 970704 & 0.09 & 1.5e--003 & 4.2e--005 &15-10000 &B(tr.6293)& 0.19 \\
466: 95 & 000607 & 0.09 & 1.2e--004 & 5.4e--006 &15-3000 & U,N,GCN693& -\\
467: 119 & 020218a & 0.09 & - & - & - & -& -\\
468: 48 & 980330a & 0.10 & 5.2e--005 & 3.0e--006 &15-5000 & B(tr.6668)& 0.12\\
469: 112 & 010616 & 0.10 & 1.8e--005 & 1.5e--006 &15-1000 & -& -\\
470: \tableline
471: \end{tabular}
472: \end{center}
473: \end{table}
474:
475: \end {document}
476:
477:
478: