1: % Manuscript written by Marc Audard and Co-authors May-September 2005
2: %at Columbia Astrophysics Lab.
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4:
5: %% Use of EmulateApJ
6: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
7: \usepackage{apjfonts}
8:
9: %\usepackage[draft,dark,dvips]{draftcopy}
10: %\usepackage{amsmath}
11:
12: %\newcommand{\arcmin}{$^{\prime}$}
13: %\newcommand{\arcsec}{$^{\prime\prime}$}
14: \newcommand{\cmsq}{cm$^{-2}$}
15: \newcommand{\cmcc}{cm$^{-3}$}
16: \newcommand{\umjy}{$\mu$Jy}
17: \newcommand{\mjy}{mJy}
18: \newcommand{\cps}{ct~s$^{-1}$}
19: \newcommand{\cpks}{ct~ks$^{-1}$}
20: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
21: \newcommand{\cpksarcminsq}{ct~ks$^{-1}$~arcmin$^{-2}$}
22: \newcommand{\ergps}{ergs~s$^{-1}$}
23: \newcommand{\ergcms}{ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}
24: \newcommand{\ergpshz}{ergs~s$^{-1}$~Hz$^{-1}$}
25: \newcommand{\flx}{ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}
26: \newcommand{\hr}{\mbox{$^{\mathrm h}$}}
27: \newcommand{\mn}{\mbox{$^{\mathrm m}$}}
28: \newcommand{\cxc}{\textit{Chandra}}
29: \newcommand{\xmm}{\textit{XMM-Newton}}
30:
31: \newcounter{subfigure}
32:
33: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
34:
35: %\journalinfo{}
36: %\slugcomment{}
37: %\submitted{To appear in the Astrophysical Journal Letters}
38:
39: %\received{}
40: %\revised{}
41: %\accepted{}
42:
43: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
44: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
45: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
46: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
47: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
48: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
49:
50: \shorttitle{X-Ray Spectral Variability in V1118 Ori}
51: \shortauthors{Audard et al.}
52:
53: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
54: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
59: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
60: %% you desire.
61:
62: \title{X-Ray Spectral Variability During an Outburst in V1118 Ori}
63:
64: \author{M.~Audard\altaffilmark{1}, M.~G\"udel\altaffilmark{2}, S.~L.~Skinner\altaffilmark{3}, K.~R.~Briggs\altaffilmark{2},
65: F.~M.~Walter\altaffilmark{4}, G.~Stringfellow\altaffilmark{3}, R.~T.~Hamilton\altaffilmark{5}, and
66: E.~F.~Guinan\altaffilmark{5}}
67:
68: \altaffiltext{1}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Mail code 5247, 550 West
69: 120$^\mathrm{th}$ Street, New York, NY 10027, {audard@astro.columbia.edu}}
70: \altaffiltext{2}{Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland, {briggs@astro.phys.ethz.ch,
71: guedel@astro.phys.ethz.ch}}
72: \altaffiltext{3}{Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, 389 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0389, {skinners@casa.colorado.edu,
73: Guy.Stringfellow@colorado.edu}}
74: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, {fwalter@astro.sunysb.edu}}
75: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Villanova University, Villanova 19085, PA, {ryan.hamilton@villanova.edu, edward.guinan@villanova.edu}}
76:
77: \begin{abstract}
78: We present results from a multi-wavelength campaign to monitor the 2005 outburst of the low-mass young star
79: \object{V1118 Ori}. Although our campaign covers the X-ray, optical, infrared, and radio regimes, we focus in
80: this Letter on the properties of the X-ray emission in V1118 Ori during the first few months after the optical outburst.
81: \cxc\ and \xmm\ detected \object{V1118 Ori} at three epochs in early 2005. The X-ray flux and luminosity stayed
82: similar within a factor of two, and at the same level as in a pre-outburst observation in 2002. The hydrogen column
83: density showed no evidence for variation from its modest pre-outburst value of $N_\mathrm{H} \sim 3 \times 10^{21}$~\cmsq.
84: However, a spectral change occurred from a dominant hot plasma ($\sim 25$~MK) in 2002
85: and in January 2005 to a cooler plasma ($\sim 8$~MK) in February 2005 and in March 2005.
86: We hypothesize that the hot magnetic loops high in the corona were disrupted by the closing in of the accretion disk
87: due to the increased accretion rate during the outburst, whereas the lower cooler loops were probably less affected and
88: became the dominant coronal component.
89:
90: \end{abstract}
91:
92: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- stars: circumstellar matter --- stars: coronae --- stars: pre-main-sequence
93: --- stars: individual (\object{V1118 Ori}) --- X-rays: stars}
94:
95:
96: \section{Introduction}
97: \label{sect:intro}
98: The origin of X-rays remains an important topic for young accreting stars. Although
99: scaled-up, solar-like magnetic activity is the dominant mechanism in most
100: moderately accreting young stars (\citealt{gahm80,walter84,damiani95,damiani_micela95}, etc; see
101: \citealt{bertout89,feigelson99,guedel04} for reviews), there is also
102: evidence that accretion may play an important role in others \citep{kastner02,stelzer04,schmitt05}.
103: Shocks in jets may also contribute to the soft X-ray component observed in some
104: young stars \citep{guedel05a,kastner05}.
105: Highly accreting stars can help us to understand how the accretion disk
106: interacts with the stellar magnetosphere and photosphere and to understand the importance of accretion in the
107: X-ray emission in young stars. A handful of such young stars display powerful eruptive events
108: with flux increases in the optical regime of a few magnitudes. Such outbursts are thought to originate during a rapid
109: increase of the disk accretion rate over a short period of time, from values of
110: $10^{-7}$~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ to $10^{-4}$~$M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep[see][]{hartmann96}.
111: The origin of the change in accretion rate is subject to debate, and could be triggered by
112: close companions or thermal disk instabilities. Two classes of erupting young stars have
113: emerged: FU Orionis stars (FUors), which display outbursts of 4 magnitudes and more that last
114: several decades, and EXors (named after the prototype EX Lup), which display smaller outbursts
115: ($\Delta V=2-3$~mag) that last from a few months to a few years and that may occur repeatedly
116: \citep[e.g.,][]{herbig77}.
117:
118: On January 10, 2005, \citet{williams05} reported the outburst of \object{V1118 Ori},
119: a low-mass M1e young EXor star ($d = 470$~pc; $M_\star = 0.41 M_\sun$;
120: $R_\star=1.29 R_\sun$; $P_\mathrm{rot} = 2.23 \pm 0.04$~d;
121: $L_\mathrm{bol} \geq 0.25~L_\sun$; $\log T_\mathrm{eff} [K] = 3.562$; $\log t [yr] = 6.28$;
122: \citealt{hillenbrand97,stassun99}).
123: V1118 Ori has been known for its outbursts
124: in the past (e.g., 1983-84, 1988-90, 1992-94, 1997-98; see \citealt{garcia00} for details).
125: For this 2005 outburst, we have started a
126: multi-wavelength monitoring campaign. In this Letter, we report first results from our campaign, and
127: focus on the observations in the X-ray regime obtained with \cxc\ and \xmm.
128:
129:
130: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
131: \label{sect:data}
132:
133: \subsection{X-Ray}
134:
135: About two weeks after the IAU Circular by \citet{williams05}, \facility{\textit{Chandra}}
136: observed V1118 Ori, and \facility{\textit{XMM-Newton}} subsequently observed in February and March 2005.
137: We also retrieved archival data of serendipitous, pre-outburst observations of V1118 Ori by \xmm\ in
138: October 2001 and by \cxc\ in September 2002. The latter was published by \citet{ramirez04}
139: who reported the detection of V1118 Ori (source S029).
140: Table~\ref{tab:xray} provides a log of the observations.
141:
142: The \cxc\ data were reduced with the CIAO 3.2.1 software with CALDB 3.01.
143: For the 2005 observation, we extracted 12 events in the $0.1-10$~keV range from a circle
144: with a radius of 2\arcsec\ centered at the position of V1118 Ori on the ACIS-S detector.
145: %$\mathrm{R.A.}=05\hr 34\mn 44\fs 75$ and $\mathrm{Dec} = -05\arcdeg 33\arcmin 41\farcs 91$.
146: For the background, we used a nearby 10\arcsec\ radius circle.
147: The scaled background contribution was 0.52~events. For the 2002 observation, in contrast,
148: we used extraction radii of 15\arcsec\ and 45\arcsec\ for V1118 Ori and the nearby background,
149: respectively, because of the large off-axis angle ($\theta = 8\farcm 85$) of V1118 Ori on the ACIS-I detector.
150:
151: The \xmm\ data were reduced with the SAS 6.1.0 software.
152: For the 2005 observations, events were extracted using circles with radii of 20\arcsec\ for V1118 Ori
153: and 60\arcsec\ for the background located in a nearby source-free region. For the 2001 observation,
154: when only MOS2 data were available\footnote{The EPIC pn was off and the orientation of the MOS1 detector was such that
155: V1118 Ori fell outside the field-of-view.}, we used circles of similar sizes as above at the expected position of
156: V1118 Ori and for the background. Although ellipses would better represent the shape of the point-spread-function at
157: large off-axis angles where V1118 Ori fell on the MOS2 detector, SAS does not accurately
158: calculate effective areas for such shapes.
159:
160: \subsection{Optical and Near-Infrared}
161:
162: We obtained optical ($V$, $R$, and $I$) and near-infrared ($J$, $H$, and $K$) photometry using
163: the SMARTS\footnote{SMARTS, the Small and Medium Aperture Research Telescope Facility, is
164: a consortium of universities and research institutions that operate the
165: small telescopes at Cerro Tololo under contract with AURA.} 1.0~m and 1.3~m telescopes.
166: Magnitudes are measured differentially with respect to field stars.
167: We have used 2MASS magnitudes to convert the $JHK$ differential magnitudes to true observed magnitudes.
168: For the optical bands, we have used arbitrary reference magnitudes of $V_\mathrm{ref} = 10.25$,
169: $R_\mathrm{ref} = 9.5$, and $I_\mathrm{ref} = 8.75$ to match the magnitudes obtained by the Villanova group.
170: Details about the SMARTS data will be provided elsewhere together with accompanying spectra
171: \citetext{Stringfellow et al.~2005, in preparation}.
172:
173: Photometric coverage of V1118 Ori from the Villanova University Observatory
174: was obtained from 2005 January 28 to March 16. Observations were
175: carried out in standard Bessel $V$, $R$, and $I$ filters. Dark and flat field frames
176: were collected at the end of each night's observations. We assigned a standard
177: error of 0.05 mag for these observations, estimated from the signal-to-noise ratio and seeing
178: conditions.
179:
180:
181:
182:
183: \subsection{Radio}
184: The \facility{{\em Very Large Array}} (VLA\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) is
185: a facility of the National Science Foundation operated
186: under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities Inc.}) observed V1118 Ori
187: on 2005 January 24 from 04:56 UT to 05:56 UT in hybrid BnA configuration,
188: using the continuum mode at 8.435~GHz (3.56~cm) with a total bandwidth of 100~MHz.
189: The primary and secondary calibrators were 3C48
190: and J0541$-$056, respectively. The total on-source time was
191: 38 minutes for V1118 Ori.
192:
193:
194: Data were edited and calibrated using AIPS\footnote{Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS)
195: is a software package developed by NRAO.}.
196: We obtain a $3\sigma$ upper limit to the flux density of V1118 Ori
197: of $S_{3.6} \leq 0.075$~mJy, corresponding to $L_{3.6}$ $\leq$
198: $2 \times 10^{16}$~ergs~Hz$^{-1}$~s$^{-1}$.
199:
200: \section{Results}
201: \label{sect:results}
202:
203: Figure~\ref{fig:fig1} shows light curves of V1118 Ori in the optical and near-infrared bands, and in X-rays.
204: During each of the X-ray observations, the X-ray flux stayed relatively constant and showed no strong variability
205: due to, e.g., flares. We have thus used the full duration of the observations
206: for our spectral analysis. We fitted the background-subtracted spectra with 1-$T$ collisional
207: ionization equilibrium models (additional components were not needed) based on the Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code
208: \citep[APEC 1.3.1;][]{smith01} as implemented in XSPEC \citep{arnaud96} with a photoelectric
209: absorption component, $N_\mathrm{H}$, generally free to vary and that uses cross sections from \citet{balucinska92}. Abundances
210: are relative to the solar photospheric values \citep{grevesse98}.
211: Table~\ref{tab:xray} summarizes the best-fit models, X-ray fluxes and luminosities with 68\% confidence
212: ranges.
213:
214: The observations in 2001 and 2002 are useful to determine the pre-outburst X-ray properties
215: of V1118 Ori and compare them with those in the early phases of outburst in 2005.
216: Unfortunately, V1118 Ori was not detected in 2001 down to $F_\mathrm{X} < 2.3 \times
217: 10^{-14}$~\ergcms\ (95\% Bayesian upper limit; \citealt{kraft91}). However, it was detected
218: in 2002 \citep[see][]{ramirez04} and its X-ray spectrum was dominated by a hot plasma
219: ($25$~MK) and low $N_\mathrm{H}$ ($3 \times 10^{21}$~\cmsq) after we fixed the metallicity at the outburst value,
220: $Z=0.17$ (see Tab.~\ref{tab:xray}).
221:
222: The \cxc\ January 2005 observation collected too few counts to fit a conventional binned spectrum.
223: We have instead used a maximum-likelihood fit method for unbinned
224: data as described in \citet{guedel05b}. Briefly, the method compares the distribution of the
225: event energies with the spectral energy distribution of template spectra characterized by
226: the plasma $T$, $N_\mathrm{H}$, and $L_\mathrm{X}$, for a fixed metallicity
227: (we adopted $Z=0.17$). We determined that the plasma
228: in V1118 Ori was hot ($>18$~MK), similar to the pre-outburst 2002 data.
229:
230: We fitted the \xmm\ EPIC pn and MOS spectra of February 2005 simultaneously. Whereas the X-ray flux and
231: $N_\mathrm{H}$ did not vary much compared to January 2005 and September 2002, the X-ray spectrum of V1118 Ori was
232: instead dominated by a cooler $8$~MK plasma with $Z = 0.17$. To establish whether a real change in plasma temperature
233: and $N_\mathrm{H}$ occurred between 2002 and February 2005, we performed
234: simultaneous fits of these spectra, with each parameter (i.e., $T$ and
235: $N_\mathrm{H}$) in turn
236: (a) tied to be the same value in both observations but free to vary, and (b) allowed to vary independently. We kept $Z$ fixed to 0.17
237: but left the normalizations free to vary in each observation. $F$-test results confirmed that the joint fit
238: was significantly improved by allowing the temperature to be different ($F=27.59$, for a probability of $< 0.001$
239: that the improvement is by chance). On the other hand, allowing different $N_\mathrm{H}$ for a model with two temperature
240: components was not significantly better ($F=0.42$, for a probability of $0.52$). Figure~\ref{fig:fig2} shows the observed (absorbed)
241: X-ray fluxed spectra in the hard 2002 pre-outburst state and in the February 2005 soft outburst state.
242:
243: The March 2005 \xmm\ data were of lower quality than those of February 2005, due to a much higher background level
244: resulting from solar activity. The pn data were more affected than the MOS data, so we fitted only the MOS1 and MOS2
245: spectra simultaneously. We obtained cool temperatures of $6-16$~MK for plasma abundances between $Z=0$ (best-fit
246: abundance) and $Z=0.17$ (fixed value of February 2005). As above, we performed simultaneous fits of the March
247: and February 2005 spectra. $F$-test results confirmed that the fit quality did not improve when the temperature ($F = 0.56$ for
248: a probability of $0.46$) or $N_\mathrm{H}$ ($F=0.85$ for a probability of $0.36$) were allowed to be different in the two
249: observations. However, the same comparison of the March 2005 data with that of September 2002 found a significant improvement
250: in fit quality when we allowed the temperatures to be different ($F = 6.64$ with a probability of $0.01$) although not the
251: $N_\mathrm{H}$ ($F = 1.47$ with a probability of $0.23$). Thus, the March 2005 plasma temperature is significantly cooler than
252: in 2002, while in line with the temperature observed in February 2005. In conclusion, at some point after the initial outburst, a marked
253: change in plasma temperature occurred, which has remained unchanged on a time scale of at least one month.
254:
255:
256:
257:
258: \section{Discussion}
259: \label{sect:discussion}
260:
261: The X-ray properties of the 2005 outburst of the EXor-type star V1118 Ori are remarkable in view of
262: its temperature change, which was not immediate but occurred a few months after the onset of the outburst
263: in the optical and near-infrared regimes. Furthermore, the X-ray flux and luminosity of V1118 Ori varied by only
264: a factor of two during the outburst and compared to the serendipitous observation in 2002. The fluxes in the
265: optical and near-infrared varied more significantly, within factors of $2-10$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:fig1}).
266: The hydrogen column density stayed relatively low, $N_\mathrm{H} \sim (1-5) \times 10^{21}$~\cmsq,
267: throughout the observations, giving no indication for additional absorption during the outburst.
268:
269: The disappearance of the hot plasma component, replaced by a dominant cool
270: plasma in February and
271: March 2005, is intriguing. There was no evidence that the high temperatures observed in 2002 and January 2005 were due
272: to flares. First, the X-ray light curves showed no evidence for flares. Second, flares in magnetically active
273: stars are accompanied by increases in both flux and luminosity. However, the X-ray fluxes, e.g., in 2002 ($F_\mathrm{X} \sim
274: [3.4 \pm 0.3] \times 10^{-14}$~\ergcms) and in February 2005 ($F_\mathrm{X} \sim 2.9^{+0.2}_{-0.3} \times 10^{-14}$~\ergcms) are similar. In addition,
275: the X-ray luminosity in February 2005 is about twice as large as the X-ray luminosity in 2002.
276: Thus, it is plausible that the dramatically increased accretion rate onto the star is responsible,
277: directly or indirectly, for the change in the plasma temperature.
278:
279: When the accretion disk closed in near the star due to the increase in mass accretion rate, as
280: suggested by models for accreting binaries (\citealt{elsner77,ghosh79}), it plausibly disrupted the magnetosphere.
281: Using the scaling laws of \citet{rosner78}, the height of a magnetic loop, $h$, is related to the temperature at its apex (most of the emission measure in a loop
282: has a similar temperature) and the average electron density, $n_\mathrm{e}$ in \cmcc, as $h = 8.41 \times 10^5 T^2 / n_e$ in cm.
283: If the loops have a density of $n_e$ is $10^{10}$~\cmcc, as is consistent with the densities observed in magnetically
284: active stars \citep{ness04}, we get loop heights of $5 \times 10^{10}$ cm for $T=25$~MK, i.e.,
285: of the order of the stellar radius ($8.6 \times 10^{10}$~cm). In contrast, cooler loops (e.g., $8$~MK) have
286: ten times smaller heights, i.e., they are smaller than the stellar radius and thus compact compared to the dimensions of the accretion disk; thus,
287: when the accretion disk grows inward due to an increased mass accretion rate, the hotter loops interact first with the
288: accreting matter and are likely to be disrupted. A new magnetic configuration
289: then may have led preferentially to compact cool loops, thus enhancing the emission measure of the previously
290: undetected cool coronal component.
291:
292: The above properties contrast with those of another erupting young star, V1647 Ori, which displayed a
293: strong X-ray flux increase coincident with the optical/near-infrared outburst \citep{kastner04}.
294: In addition, V1647 Ori displayed a high $N_\mathrm{H}$ ($\sim 4 \times 10^{22}$~\cmsq)
295: which was interpreted as an indication for a dense disk wind \citep{grosso05}. A cool
296: component was detected together with the hot component in V1647 Ori, but \citet{grosso05} interpreted the former
297: component as accretion shocks onto the stellar photosphere. It is unlikely that the cool component in V1118 Ori
298: originates from shocks because free-fall velocities of matter falling from the truncation radius are too slow.
299: Even if X-rays would be generated in shocks, they would likely be too absorbed to be detected \citep{drake05}.
300:
301:
302: The V1118 Ori observations suggest that the enhanced mass accretion rate during its outburst likely had an indirect
303: impact on the star's X-ray emission. Long-term multi-wavelength monitoring will provide important clues to understanding
304: the importance of accretion in the X-ray emission in highly accreting young stars.
305:
306: \acknowledgments
307:
308: We thank the referee, J.~J. Drake, for useful comments and suggestions that improved this paper.
309: We acknowledge support by NASA through \cxc\ award DD5-6029X and through \xmm\ award NNG05GI96G
310: to Columbia University. The \cxc\ X-ray Observatory Center is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical
311: Observatory for and on behalf of the NASA under contract NAS8-03060. Based on observations obtained with
312: \xmm, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA.
313: The PSI group acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 20-58827.99
314: and 20-66875.01). Stony Brook's participation in SMARTS is made possible by support from the
315: offices of the Provost and the Vice President for Research. We thank J. Allyn Smith, P. McGehee,
316: J. Espinoza, and D. Gonzalez for doing the observations with the SMARTS telescopes.
317: We also thank H. Tannanbaum, N. Schartel, and the VLA TOO panel for granting time to observe V1118 Ori,
318: K. Arzner for providing us with the maximum-likelihood fit tools, and K.~Menou for stimulating discussions.
319:
320: \begin{thebibliography}{}
321:
322:
323: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K.~A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101,
324: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. Jacoby \& J. Barnes
325: (San Francisco: ASP), 1
326:
327: \bibitem[Balucinska-Church \& McCammon(1992)]{balucinska92}
328: Balucinska-Church, M., \& McCammon, D.\ 1992, \apj, 400, 699
329:
330: \bibitem[Bertout(1989)]{bertout89} Bertout, C.\ 1989, \araa, 27, 351
331:
332: \bibitem[Damiani \& Micela(1995)]{damiani_micela95} Damiani, F., \& Micela, G.\ 1995, \apj, 446, 341
333:
334: \bibitem[Damiani et al.(1995)]{damiani95} Damiani, F., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., \& Harnden, F.~R.\ 1995, \apj, 446, 331
335:
336: \bibitem[Drake(2005)]{drake05} Drake, J.~J. 2005, in Proc. 13th Cool Stars
337: Workshop, ed. F. Favata et al. (ESA), 519
338:
339: \bibitem[Elsner \& Lamb(1977)]{elsner77} Elsner, R.~F., \& Lamb, F.~K.\ 1977, \apj, 215, 897
340:
341: \bibitem[Feigelson \& Montmerle(1999)]{feigelson99} Feigelson, E.~D., \& Montmerle, T.\ 1999, \araa, 37, 363
342:
343: \bibitem[Gahm(1980)]{gahm80} Gahm, G.~F.\ 1980, \apjl, 242, L163
344:
345: \bibitem[Garcia Garcia \& Parsamian(2000)]{garcia00} Garcia Garcia, J., \& Parsamian, E.~S.\ 2000, Informational Bulletin on Variable
346: Stars, 4925, 1
347:
348: \bibitem[Ghosh \& Lamb(1979)]{ghosh79} Ghosh, P., \& Lamb, F.~K.\ 1979, \apj, 232, 259
349:
350: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{grevesse98} Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A.~J.
351: 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
352:
353: \bibitem[Grosso et al.(2005)]{grosso05} Grosso, N., Kastner, J.~H., Ozawa, H., Richmond, M., Simon, T.,
354: Weintraub, D.~A., Hamaguchi, K., \& Frank, A.\ 2005, A\&A, 159
355:
356: \bibitem[G{\"u}del(2004)]{guedel04} G{\"u}del, M.\ 2004, \aapr, 12, 71
357:
358: \bibitem[G{\" u}del et al.(2005a)]{guedel05a} G{\" u}del, M., Skinner, S.~L., Briggs, K.~R., Audard, M., Arzner, K.,
359: \& Telleschi, A.\ 2005a, \apjl, 626, L53
360:
361: \bibitem[G{\" u}del et al.(2005b)]{guedel05b} G\"udel, M., Skinner, S.~L., Telleschi, A., Briggs, K.~R., Audard, M., Arzner, K., \&
362: Smith, K.~W. 2005b, in Proc. 13th Cool Stars Workshop, ed. F. Favata et al. (ESA), 601
363:
364: \bibitem[Hartmann \& Kenyon(1996)]{hartmann96} Hartmann, L., \& Kenyon, S.~J.\ 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 207
365:
366: \bibitem[Herbig(1977)]{herbig77} Herbig, G.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 217, 693
367:
368: \bibitem[Hillenbrand(1997)]{hillenbrand97} Hillenbrand, L.~A.\ 1997, \aj, 113, 1733
369:
370: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2002)]{kastner02} Kastner, J.~H., Huenemoerder, D.~P., Schulz, N.~S., Canizares, C.~R., \&
371: Weintraub, D.~A.\ 2002, ApJ, 567, 434
372:
373: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2004)]{kastner04} Kastner, J.~H., et al.\ 2004, Nature, 430, 429
374:
375: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2005)]{kastner05} Kastner, J.~H., et al.\ 2005, \apjs, 160, 511
376:
377: \bibitem[Kraft et al.(1991)]{kraft91} Kraft, R.~P., Burrows, D.~N., \& Nousek, J.~A.
378: \ 1991, \apj, 374, 344
379:
380: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2004)]{ness04} Ness, J.-U., G{\" u}del, M., Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M., Audard, M., \& Telleschi, A.\ 2004, \aap, 427, 667
381:
382: \bibitem[Ram{\'{\i}}rez et al.(2004)]{ramirez04} Ram{\'{\i}}rez,
383: S.~V., et al.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 787
384:
385: \bibitem[Rosner et al.(1978)]{rosner78} Rosner, R., Tucker, W.~H., \& Vaiana, G.~S.\ 1978, \apj, 220, 643
386:
387: \bibitem[Schmitt et al.(2005)]{schmitt05} Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M., Robrade, J., Ness, J.-U., Favata, F., \& Stelzer, B. 2005, A\&A, 432, L35
388:
389: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2001)]{smith01} Smith, R.~K., Brickhouse, N.~S., Liedahl,
390: D.~A., Raymond, J.~C. 2001, ApJ, 556, L91
391:
392: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(1999)]{stassun99} Stassun, K.~G., Mathieu, R.~D., Mazeh, T., \& Vrba, F.~J.\ 1999, \aj, 117, 2941
393:
394: \bibitem[Stelzer \& Schmitt(2004)]{stelzer04} Stelzer, B., \& Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M.\ 2004, A\&A, 418, 687
395:
396: \bibitem[Walter \& Kuhi(1984)]{walter84} Walter, F.~M., \& Kuhi, L.~V.\ 1984, \apj, 284, 194
397:
398: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2005)]{williams05}
399: Williams, P., Bembrick, C., \& Lee, S.\ 2005, \iaucirc, 8460, 3
400:
401: \end{thebibliography}
402:
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
406:
407: \clearpage
408:
409: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
410: %\rotate
411: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
412: \tablecolumns{6}
413: \tablewidth{0pc}
414: \tablecaption{Observation log and X-ray Properties of V1118 Ori.\label{tab:xray}}
415: \tablehead{
416: \colhead{\makebox[45mm][c]{Parameter}} &\colhead{Oct 2001} & \colhead{Sep 2002} & \colhead{Jan 2005} & \colhead{Feb 2005} & \colhead{Mar 2005}}
417: \startdata
418: Satellite\dotfill & \xmm & \cxc & \cxc & \xmm & \xmm \\
419: ObsID\dotfill & \dataset[ADS/Sa.XMM#X/0112590301]{0112590301} & \dataset[ADS/Sa.CXO#obs/2548]{2548} & \dataset[ADS/Sa.CXO#obs/6204]{6204} &
420: \dataset[ADS/Sa.XMM#X/0212480301]{0212480301} & \dataset[ADS/Sa.XMM#X/0212480401]{0212480401} \\
421: Duration (ks)\dotfill & 40 & 48 & 5 & 20 & 20 \\
422: Observation date (UT)\dotfill & 2001 Oct 3 & 2002 Sep 6--7 & 2005 Jan 26 & 2005 Feb 18-19 & 2005 Mar 21 \\
423: \dotfill & 01:02--12:03 & 12:57--02:54 & 03:07--05:04 & 22:36--04:50 & 16:20--22:08 \\
424: Average Julian date - 2,450,000\dotfill & 2,185.8 & 2,524.3 & 3,396.7 & 3,420.6 & 3,451.3 \\
425: Net counts\dotfill & $< 26.3$ & $169.7$ & $11.5$ & $494.1$\tablenotemark{a}& $252.5$\tablenotemark{a} \\
426: $N_\mathrm{H}$ ($10^{21}$~\cmsq)\dotfill & \nodata & $2.7^{+1.2}_{-0.9}$ & $1.4^{+3.6}_{-1.4}$ & $4.3^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$ & $1.4^{+0.8}_{-0.5}$ \\
427: $T$ (MK)\dotfill & \nodata & $25.1^{+6.3}_{-4.8}$ & $46^{+\infty}_{-28}$ & $7.7^{+1.3}_{-0.8}$ & $15.9^{+3.9}_{-2.0}$ \\
428: EM ($10^{53}$~\cmcc)\dotfill & \nodata & $1.5^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$ & $0.5^{+0.6}_{-0.2}$ & $4.0^{+1.4}_{-1.4}$ & $2.9^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ \\
429: $Z/Z_\sun$\dotfill & \nodata & $:= 0.17$ & $:=0.17$ & $0.17^{+0.20}_{-0.06}$ & $:=0.17$ \\
430: $F_\mathrm{X}$ ($10^{-14}$~\ergcms)\tablenotemark{b}\dotfill & $< 2.3$ & $3.1-3.7$ & $0.9-3.5$ & $2.6-3.1$ & $5.2-6.6$ \\
431: $L_\mathrm{X}$ ($10^{30}$~\ergps)\tablenotemark{b}\dotfill & $< 1.1$ & $1.5-1.8$ & $0.3-1.3$ & $3.2-3.8$ & $2.5-3.2$
432: \enddata
433: \tablecomments{The uncertainties are based on 68\% Bayesian confidence ranges, whereas the upper limits for 2001 are 95\% Bayesian upper limits.}
434: \tablenotetext{a}{Net counts for the sum of pn, MOS1, and MOS2 in February 2005 and for the sum of MOS1 and MOS2 in March 2005}
435: \tablenotetext{b}{X-ray luminosity and absorbed X-ray flux in the $0.1-10$~keV range, assuming $d=470$~pc.}
436: \end{deluxetable}
437:
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441:
442: \clearpage
443: \begin{figure}
444: \centering
445: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.75\textwidth]{f1.eps}
446: \caption{Long-term light curves of V1118 Ori. Notice the broken time axis with different scales for
447: the pre-outburst epoch (1,200 days) and the outburst epoch (160 days).
448: Constant zero-point magnitudes were added to the optical SMARTS data to eye-match the Villanova data (see text).
449: The uncertainties are plotted but are small compared to the day-to-day variability observed in the optical and near-infrared.
450: The left y-axis refers to X-ray data, whereas the right y-axis refers to the photometric optical and near-infrared
451: data.\label{fig:fig1}}
452: \end{figure}
453:
454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
455: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
457:
458: \clearpage
459: \begin{figure}
460: \centering
461: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.75\textwidth]{f2.eps}
462: \caption{Fluxed spectra (uncorrected for photoelectric absorption) of the September 2002 (solid) and February 2005 (dash-dotted) observations of V1118 Ori.
463: The soft excess ($0.6-1$~keV) is visible in the \xmm\ observation during the outburst. In contrast the hard ($> 2$~keV)
464: in the pre-outburst \cxc\ data is evident.
465: \label{fig:fig2}}
466: \end{figure}
467:
468: %
469:
470: \end{document}
471:
472: