1: % ApJLetters journal: final submission
2: % I.V.Moskalenko, T.A.Porter, A.W.Strong
3: % Attenuation of VHE gamma rays by the Milky Way Interstellar Radiation Field
4:
5: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
6:
7: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
8: %\topmargin -0.5in
9:
10: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
12:
13: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
14:
15: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
16: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
17:
18: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
19:
20: %\usepackage{amsmath}
21: %\usepackage{amsfonts}
22: %\usepackage{amssymb}
23: %\usepackage{graphicx}
24:
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: % Author's definitions
27: \newcommand{\gray}{$\gamma$-ray}
28: \newcommand{\grays}{$\gamma$-rays}
29: \newcommand{\Dxx}{D_{xx}}
30: \newcommand{\hi}{H {\sc i}}
31: \newcommand{\hii}{H {\sc ii}}
32: \newcommand{\e}[2]{$^{#1}_{#2}$}
33: \newcommand{\Xco}{$X_{\rm CO}$}
34: \newcommand{\Xcounits}{$10^{20}$~molecules~cm$^{-2}$/~(K km s$^{-1}$)\ }
35: %%%%%%%%% Define journals
36: \newcommand{\icrc}{Int.\ Cosmic Ray Conf.\ }
37: \newcommand{\adv}{Adv.\ Space Res.}
38: \newcommand{\app}{Astropart.\ Phys.}
39: \newcommand{\nphysb}{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B}
40: \newcommand{\pr}{Phys.\ Rev.}
41: \newcommand{\plb}{Phys.\ Lett.\ B}
42: %\newcommand{\rmp}{Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.}
43: \newcommand{\pubjournal}[5]{#4, #1, #2, #3}
44: \newcommand{\pubjournala}[5]{#4, #1, #3}
45: \newcommand{\pubjournalb}[5]{#4, #5 #1 #3}
46: \newcommand{\wcap}{0.476\textwidth}
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48:
49: %%\slugcomment{}
50:
51: \shorttitle{Attenuation of VHE gamma rays}
52: \shortauthors{Moskalenko et al.}
53: \journalinfo{The Astrophysical Journal}
54: \submitted{Submitted 2005 November 2; accepted 2006 February 17}
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \title{Attenuation of VHE gamma rays by the Milky Way Interstellar Radiation Field}
59:
60: \author{Igor V. Moskalenko\altaffilmark{1}}
61: \affil{
62: Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory,
63: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
64: \email{imos@stanford.edu}}
65: \altaffiltext{1}{Also Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology,
66: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309}
67:
68: \author{Troy A. Porter}
69: \affil{
70: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University,
71: Baton Rouge, LA 70803
72: \email{tporter@lsu.edu}}
73:
74: \and
75:
76: \author{Andrew W. Strong}
77: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
78: Postfach 1312, D-85741 Garching, Germany
79: \email{aws@mpe.mpg.de}}
80:
81:
82: \begin{abstract}
83: The attenuation of very high energy \grays\ by pair production
84: on the Galactic interstellar radiation field has long been thought of as
85: negligible. However, a new calculation of the interstellar radiation field
86: consistent with multi-wavelength
87: observations by DIRBE and FIRAS indicates that the energy density of the
88: Galactic interstellar radiation field is higher, particularly in the Galactic
89: center, than previously thought.
90: We have made a calculation of the
91: attenuation of very high energy \grays\ in the Galaxy using this
92: new interstellar radiation field which
93: takes into account its nonuniform spatial and angular
94: distributions.
95: We find that the maximum attenuation occurs around 100 TeV at the
96: level of about 25\% for sources located at the Galactic center,
97: and is important for both Galactic and extragalactic sources.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \keywords{Galaxy: general --- gamma-rays: observations ---
101: gamma-rays: theory --- radiation mechanisms: general --- radiative transfer}
102:
103: \section{Introduction}
104: %##############################################################################
105: The attenuation of very high energy (VHE) \grays\ by pair production on the
106: Galactic interstellar radiation field (ISRF) has previously been considered
107: to be negligible \citep{Nikishov62,Protheroe1986}.
108: The main contribution is thought to come from pair production on
109: the cosmic microwave
110: background (CMB) where the effective threshold for attenuation is $\sim$100 TeV
111: and a maximum is reached at about 2000 TeV, currently accessible only
112: via air-shower experiments.
113: The Galactic ISRF photons are more energetic so that the effective
114: threshold is lower ($\sim$100 GeV) and the attenuation increases slowly
115: to a maximum around 100 TeV.
116: This covers the energy range of present day Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov
117: Telescopes,
118: such as the HESS instrument.
119: A rough estimate of the attenuation of VHE \grays\ coming from the
120: Galactic center (GC), which uses a new ISRF \citep{PS05}, but assumes
121: an isotropic angular distribution for the ISRF, shows that the effect is
122: observable \citep{Z05}.
123: Given the essential
124: anisotropy of the Galactic ISRF with most of the photons going outwards from
125: the inner Galaxy, the
126: effect depends on the position of the source of VHE photons and its orientation
127: relative to the observer in the Galactic plane.
128: We calculate the attenuation of VHE \grays\ due to pair production
129: with the Galactic photon field using the
130: total ISRF over the entire Galaxy on a fine spatial grid
131: which takes into account the nonuniform spatial
132: and anisotropic angular distribution of background photons.
133:
134:
135: \vspace{2\baselineskip}
136: \section{Interstellar Radiation Field}
137: %##############################################################################
138: The essential ingredients to calculate the Galactic ISRF are a model for
139: the distribution of stars in the Galaxy, a model for the dust distribution and
140: properties, and a treatment of scattering, absorption, and subsequent
141: re-emission of the stellar light by the dust.
142: We briefly describe our ISRF calculation, which is a further development
143: of the work reported by \cite{PS05}; full details will be given
144: in a forthcoming paper (Porter \& Strong, in preparation).
145:
146: Our stellar model assumes a type classification based on that used in the
147: SKY model of \cite{Wainscoat1992}.
148: It includes 87 stellar classes encompassing main sequence stars, AGB stars
149: and exotics.
150: For each stellar type there is a local star number density,
151: scale height above the plane,
152: fraction of local number density in each of several discrete spatial
153: components,
154: and spectrum in standard photometric filters.
155: The stars are distributed in seven geometrical
156: components: thin and thick disc, halo, bulge, bar, ring, and spiral arms.
157: Spectra for normal stars are taken from the synthetic spectral
158: library of \cite{Girardi2002}.
159: Spectra for AGB stars and exotics are as given in the SKY model.
160:
161: \begin{figure}[t]
162: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
163: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1a.eps}}\vspace{2\baselineskip}
164: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1b.eps}}
165: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
166: \caption{Interstellar radiation field energy density.
167: Local interstellar radiation field (upper):
168: heavy solid line, total radiation field including CMB;
169: heavy dashed line, contribution by stars;
170: heavy dotted line, scattered light;
171: heavy dot-dashed line, infra-red;
172: thin solid line, local ISRF from \cite{Strong2000}.
173: Data: squares, Apollo \citep{Henry1980};
174: triangles, DIRBE \citep{Arendt1998};
175: circles, FIRAS \citep{Finkbeiner1999}.
176: Interstellar total radiation field radial variation (lower):
177: solid line, $(R, z) = (0$ kpc, 0 kpc);
178: dashed line, $(R, z) = (4$ kpc, 0 kpc);
179: dotted line, $(R, z) = (12$ kpc, 0 kpc);
180: dash-dotted line, $(R, z) = (16$ kpc, 0 kpc).
181: Heavy lines are for our ISRF; thin lines for the ISRF of \cite{Strong2000}.
182: \label{fig1}}
183: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
184: \end{figure}
185:
186: We assume a dust model
187: including graphite, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and silicate.
188: Dust grains in the model are spherical and the absorption
189: and scattering efficiencies for graphite, PAHs, and silicate grains
190: are taken from \cite{Li2001}.
191: The grain model abundance and size distribution are taken from
192: \cite{Weingartner2001} (their best fit Milky Way model), and
193: a purely neutral interstellar medium is assumed.
194: We consider only coherent scattering, and a Henyey-Greenstein angular
195: distribution function \citep{Henyey1941} is used in the scattering calculation.
196: The stochastic heating of grains smaller than $\sim0.1$ $\mu$m
197: is treated
198: using the ``thermal continuous'' approach of \cite{Draine2001};
199: we calculate the equilibrium heating of larger dust grains by balancing
200: absorption with re-emission as described by \cite{Li2001}.
201:
202: Dust is assumed to follow the Galactic gas distribution.
203: We use the gas model
204: for neutral and molecular hydrogen given by \cite{Moskalenko2002}.
205: The radial variation in the Galactic metallicity gradient is taken to be
206: 0.07 dex/kpc \citep[][and references therein]{Strong2004b}.
207:
208: A cylindrical geometry is adopted for the radiation field calculation.
209: Our calculations are simplified by assuming symmetry in azimuth and
210: about the Galactic plane.
211: The maximum radial extent is taken to be $R_{\rm max} = 20$ kpc.
212: The maximum height above the Galactic plane is taken to be $z_{\rm max} = 5$
213: kpc. The Sun is located at $R_S = 8.5$ kpc from the GC.
214: The Galaxy is divided into elements of
215: equal volume and the total radiation field is calculated for each.
216:
217: The radiation field from stellar and scattered light is obtained using a
218: modified form of the so-called partial intensity method
219: \citep{Baes2001}.
220: Henceforth,
221: we will refer to the total stellar and scattered light as the ``optical''
222: radiation field.
223: The infra-red radiation field is obtained by using the optical
224: radiation field to calculate the
225: dust emissivity for stochastic and equilibrium heating.
226: The dust emission is integrated to obtain the infra-red
227: radiation field throughout the Galaxy.
228:
229: Fig.~\ref{fig1} (upper panel)
230: shows our calculated local ISRF including the CMB;
231: also shown in the figure is the local ISRF calculated by
232: \cite{Strong2000}.
233: The agreement of our computed ISRF with the data is generally good.
234: We note that our new ISRF provides an improved fit to the observations
235: around 100 $\mu$m compared to the earlier model of \cite{Strong2000}.
236: This is particularly important for our optical depth calculation, since the
237: majority of the attenuation is on these more numerous less-energetic photons
238: of the ISRF.
239:
240: Fig.~\ref{fig1} (lower panel) shows the radial variation in the Galactic
241: plane of our ISRF (thick lines) together with that of \cite{Strong2000}
242: (thin lines).
243: Toward the inner Galaxy, our ISRF predicts a significantly higher energy
244: density than previously described, particularly for the infra-red component.
245: This arises because of the coupling between the optical radiation field
246: and the infra-red emission: in our calculation,
247: the optical radiation field is used as
248: direct input to the dust heating calculation, which was not
249: done in previous work.
250: The intense optical radiation field toward the inner Galaxy heats the
251: dust to warmer temperatures, increasing the emission in the infra-red.
252: Even though the optical emission does not cause a direct enhancement to
253: the attenuation at GeV to TeV energies -- the energy of these photons
254: is typically a few eV, lowering the threshold, however
255: their number density is too low to provide significant absorption --
256: it is essential to calculate this component of the ISRF
257: to obtain the correct emission and angular distribution for the infra-red.
258: Further discussion of the new ISRF is deferred to a forthcoming paper (Porter
259: \& Strong, in preparation).
260:
261: \begin{figure}[t]
262: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f2.eps}}
263: \caption{Angles involved in the calculation: $(R,z,\alpha)$, galactocentric
264: coordinates of the source of VHE photons;
265: $(\theta_2,\phi_2)$, angles of the VHE photon;
266: GC marks the Galactic center; and the observer's position is marked by ``sun''.
267: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
268: \label{fig2}}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271: \section{Calculations}
272: %##############################################################################
273: The optical depth for VHE \grays\ is given by the general formula:
274: \begin{eqnarray}
275: \tau_{\gamma\gamma}(E)&&= \label{tau}\\
276: &&\int_L dx \int d\varepsilon \int d\Omega_1 \,
277: \frac{dN(\varepsilon,\Omega_1,x)}{d\varepsilon d\Omega_1}\sigma_{\gamma\gamma}
278: (\varepsilon_c) (1-\cos\theta),\nonumber
279: \end{eqnarray}
280: where $dN(\varepsilon,\Omega_1,x)/d\varepsilon d\Omega_1$ is the
281: differential number density of background photons at the
282: point $x$, $\varepsilon$ is the background photon energy,
283: $d\Omega_1=d\cos\theta_1 d\phi_1$ is a solid angle,
284: $\sigma_{\gamma\gamma}$ is the total cross section for the pair production
285: process $\gamma\gamma\to e^+e^-$ \citep{JR80},
286: $\varepsilon_c=[\frac12\varepsilon E (1-\cos\theta)]^{1/2}$
287: is the center-of-momentum system energy of a photon,
288: and $\theta$ is the angle between the
289: momenta of the two photons in the observer's frame.
290: The integral over $x$ should be taken along the path of the \grays\
291: from the source to the observer.
292:
293: The ISRF is cylindrically symmetric so that the photon angular distribution
294: depends on $R$ and $z$ only.
295: In Fig.~\ref{fig2} we illustrate the galactocentric coordinate system
296: $(R,z,\alpha)$.
297: To calculate $\cos\theta$, the polar and azimuthal angles of the VHE photon,
298: $\theta_2$ and $\phi_2$, are derived:
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: && \rho^2 = R^2+R_s^2-2RR_s\cos\alpha,\nonumber\\
301: && \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
302: \sin\phi_2 = -(R_s/\rho) \sin\alpha,\smallskip\\
303: \cos\phi_2 = -(\rho^2+R^2-R_s^2)/2R\rho,
304: \end{array} \right. \nonumber\\
305: && \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
306: \sin\theta_2 = \rho\, (\rho^2+z^2)^{-1/2},\smallskip\\
307: \cos\theta_2 = -(1-\sin^2\theta_2)^{1/2},
308: \end{array} \right. \\
309: && \cos\theta =\cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2+\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2\cos(\phi_1-\phi_2),\nonumber
310: \label{angles}
311: \end{eqnarray}
312: where $R_s$ is the galactocentric radius of the Sun.
313: The integration of eq.~(\ref{tau}) is done numerically.
314:
315: For the calculation of the optical depth in the CMB field we use the formula:
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: \tau_{\gamma\gamma}^{CMB}(E) = &&\\
318: \frac{-4kT}{(\hbar c)^3 \pi^2 E^2} &&
319: \int_L dx \int_{m_ec^2}^{\infty} d\varepsilon_c \varepsilon_c^3
320: \sigma_{\gamma\gamma}
321: (\varepsilon_c) \log\left( 1-e^{-\varepsilon_c^2/E kT}\right),\nonumber
322: \label{tau_cmb}
323: \end{eqnarray}
324: where $kT$ is the CMB temperature, and $m_ec^2$ is the electron rest mass.
325:
326: \section{Results}
327: %##############################################################################
328: Fig.~\ref{fig3} shows the attenuation for selected positions
329: $(R, z, \alpha)$ as a function of incident \gray\ energy.
330: For sources located at the GC the attenuation is
331: $\sim$12\% at 30 TeV and $\sim$23\% at 100 TeV.
332: In Table~\ref{TabTau} we give our optical depth results
333: for selected values of $R$ and $z$ for
334: $\alpha = 0^\circ, 90^\circ$ and $180^\circ$
335: at 30 and 100 TeV without contribution by the CMB.
336: The attenuation is strongest for VHE \gray\ sources located toward the inner
337: Galaxy and on its farside.
338:
339: To illustrate the effect of the anisotropic radiation field on the attenuation
340: calculation, we show in Fig.~\ref{fig4} the ratio of the optical depths
341: $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}/\tau_{\gamma\gamma}^{\rm iso}$, where $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}$ is
342: calculated using the full angular distribution of the ISRF and
343: $\tau_{\gamma\gamma} ^{\rm iso}$ is calculated assuming an isotropic distribution,
344: for a source located
345: at $z = 0$ kpc (upper panel) and $z = 5$ kpc (lower panel)
346: emitting 100 TeV \grays\ as a function of position.
347: The variation of $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}/\tau_{\gamma\gamma} ^{\rm iso}$
348: over the Galaxy as seen from Earth is non-trivial.
349: For sources located in the Galactic plane between the GC and solar system
350: the ratio is less than one since the majority of the ISRF photons are
351: coming from the GC direction, $\cos\theta \rightarrow 1$ in eq.~(\ref{tau})
352: and the interactions are mainly following, leading to a lower pair production
353: probability when the ISRF angular distribution is taken into account.
354: The reverse situation, $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}/\tau_{\gamma\gamma} ^{\rm iso} > 1$,
355: occurs for \grays\ interacting with the ISRF in the outer Galaxy, where the
356: majority of interactions are now head-on, $\cos\theta \rightarrow -1$
357: in eq.~(\ref{tau}).
358: For sources located beyond the GC, the ratio is $\sim 1$.
359: The interpretation of this case is straightforward: \grays\ emitted on
360: the farside of the Galaxy toward the solar system
361: have mainly head-on absorption interactions until
362: they reach the GC, whereupon the interactions become mainly following.
363: The isotropic case averages the angular distribution, and therefore leads
364: to $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}/\tau_{\gamma\gamma} ^{\rm iso} \sim 1$.
365: We note that the optical depth ratio increases monotonically with $z$, and
366: is a result of the progressively more head-on nature of the \gray\ absorption
367: interactions for sources located at larger distances from the plane.
368:
369: \begin{figure}[t]
370: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f3.eps}}
371: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
372: \caption{Transmittance of VHE \grays\ as a function of \gray\ energy.
373: Solid line: $(R, z, \alpha) = (0$ kpc, 0 kpc, $0^\circ)$ -- $L = 8.5$ kpc;
374: Dashed line: $(R, z, \alpha) = (20$ kpc, 0 kpc, $90^\circ)$ -- $L = 21.8$ kpc;
375: Dash-dotted line: $(R, z, \alpha) = (20$ kpc, 0 kpc, $180^\circ)$ -- $L = 28.5$
376: kpc.
377: Thick lines give the total transmittance curve including the ISRF and CMB.
378: Left-most thin lines give the transmittance for the ISRF only; right-most
379: thin lines for the CMB only.
380: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
381: \label{fig3}}
382: \end{figure}
383:
384: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrr}
385: \tablecolumns{10}
386: \tablewidth{0pc}
387: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
388: \tablecaption{Optical depth $\tau_{\gamma \gamma}$ at 30 and 100 TeV}
389: \tablehead{
390: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
391: \multicolumn{3}{c}{30 TeV} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{100 TeV} \\
392: \cline{4-6} \cline{8-10} \\
393: \colhead{R, kpc} &
394: \colhead{z, kpc} &
395: \colhead{} &
396: \colhead{$\alpha = 0^\circ$} &
397: \colhead{$90 ^\circ$} &
398: \colhead{$180^\circ$} &
399: \colhead{} &
400: \colhead{$\alpha = 0^\circ$} &
401: \colhead{$90 ^\circ$} &
402: \colhead{$180^\circ$}
403: }
404: \startdata
405: 0 & 0 & & 0.12 & \nodata & \nodata & & 0.25 & \nodata & \nodata\\
406: 5 & 0 & & 0.01 & 0.15 & 0.22 & & 0.05 & 0.32 & 0.41\\
407: 10 & 0 & & 0.01 & 0.08 & 0.28 & & 0.02 & 0.21 & 0.54\\
408: 15 & 0 & & 0.02 & 0.07 & 0.31 & & 0.05 & 0.18 & 0.58\\
409: 20 & 0 & & 0.03 & 0.07 & 0.32 & & 0.06 & 0.16 & 0.60\medskip \\
410: 0 & 5 & & 0.03 & \nodata & \nodata & & 0.09 & \nodata & \nodata\\
411: 5 & 5 & & 0.01 & 0.04 & 0.06 & & 0.05 & 0.10 & 0.15\\
412: 10 & 5 & & 0.02 & 0.05 & 0.09 & & 0.04 & 0.12 & 0.21\\
413: 15 & 5 & & 0.03 & 0.05 & 0.12 & & 0.05 & 0.13 & 0.26\\
414: 20 & 5 & & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.14 & & 0.06 & 0.13 & 0.29\\
415: \enddata
416: \label{TabTau}
417: \end{deluxetable}
418:
419: \begin{figure*}[t]
420: \centerline{
421: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4a.eps}
422: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4b.eps}}
423: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
424: \caption{Effect of anisotropic ISRF on optical depth calculation at 100 TeV.
425: Shown is the ratio of the optical depths
426: $\tau_{\gamma\gamma}/\tau_{\gamma\gamma}^{\rm iso}$ as a function of position
427: $(x,y)$ for a source located at $z = 0$ kpc (left) and $z = 5$ kpc (right).
428: The solar system is located at $(x, y)$ = (8.5 kpc, 0 kpc), exactly where the
429: optical depth ratio rises sharply.
430: \label{fig4}}
431: \vspace{1\baselineskip}
432: \end{figure*}
433:
434: Our results show that the attenuation of VHE \grays\ by the Galactic
435: radiation field may be marginally observable by the HESS instrument
436: which has an effective sensitivity up to several tens of
437: TeV \citep{Aharonian2005}.
438: The attenuation of VHE \grays\ from the sources on the Galaxy's farside
439: will essentially steepen their spectra above $\sim$10 TeV.
440: In any case correction of source spectra for absorption is required.
441: Interestingly, observations by future high energy experiments of the
442: steepening of the spectra of
443: Galactic sources in the GC region and beyond may serve as a probe
444: of the Galactic ISRF.
445:
446: \acknowledgments
447:
448: I.\ V.\ M.\ acknowledges partial support from NASA
449: Astronomy and Physics Research and Analysis Program (APRA) grant.
450: T.\ A.\ P.\ acknowledges partial support from the US Department of Energy.
451:
452: \begin{thebibliography}{}
453:
454: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005)]{Aharonian2005}
455: Aharonian, F., et al., 2005, ApJ, accepted
456: (astro-ph/0510397)
457:
458: \bibitem[Arendt, et al.(1998)]{Arendt1998}
459: Arendt, R. G., et al., \pubjournal{\apj}{508}{74}{1998}{}
460:
461: \bibitem[Baes \& Dejonghe(2001)]{Baes2001}
462: Baes, M. \& Dejonghe, H., \pubjournal{\mnras}{326}{722}{2001}{}
463:
464: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2001)]{Draine2001}
465: Draine, B. T. \& Li, A., \pubjournal{\apj}{551}{807}{2001}{}
466:
467: \bibitem[Finkbeiner, Davis \& Schlegel(1999)]{Finkbeiner1999}
468: Finkbeiner, D., Davis, M. \& Schlegel, D. J.,
469: \pubjournal{\apj}{524}{867}{1999}{}
470:
471: \bibitem[Freudenreich(1998)]{Freudenreich1998}
472: Freudenreich, H. T., \pubjournal{\apj}{492}{495}{1998}{}
473:
474: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2002)]{Girardi2002}
475: Girardi, L., et al., \pubjournal{\aap}{391}{195}{2002}{}
476:
477: \bibitem[Henry, Anderson \& Fastie(1980)]{Henry1980}
478: Henry, R. C., Anderson, R. C., \& Fastie, W. G.,
479: \pubjournal{\apj}{239}{859}{1980}{}
480:
481: \bibitem[Henyey \& Greenstein(1941)]{Henyey1941}
482: Henyey, L. G. \& Greenstein, J. L., \pubjournal{\apj}{93}{70}{1941}{}
483:
484: \bibitem[Jauch \& Rohrlich(1980)]{JR80}
485: Jauch, J. M., \& Rohrlich, F., \pubjournalb{}{}{(New York: Springer-Verlag)}
486: {1980}{Theory of Photons and Electrons}
487:
488: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{Li2001}
489: Li, A. \& Draine, B. T., \pubjournal{\apj}{554}{778}{2001}{}
490:
491: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2002)]{Moskalenko2002}
492: Moskalenko, I. V., Strong, A. W., Ormes, J. F., \& Potgieter, M. S.,
493: \pubjournal{\apj}{565}{280}{2002}{}
494:
495: \bibitem[Nikishov(1962)]{Nikishov62}
496: Nikishov, A. I., \pubjournal{Soviet Physics JETP}{14}{393}{1962}{}
497:
498: \bibitem[Porter \& Strong(2005)]{PS05}
499: Porter, T. A. \& Strong, A. W., 2005,
500: in Proc.\ $29^{\rm th}$ Int.\ Cosmic Ray Conf.\ (Pune) (astro-ph/0507119)
501:
502: \bibitem[Protheroe(1986)]{Protheroe1986}
503: Protheroe, R. J., \pubjournal{\mnras}{221}{769}{1986}{}.
504:
505: \bibitem[Strong, Moskalenko \& Reimer(2000)]{Strong2000}
506: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., \& Reimer, O., \pubjournal{\apj}{537}{763}{2000}{}
507:
508: \bibitem[Strong et al.(2004)]{Strong2004b}
509: Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., Reimer, O., Digel, S. \& Diehl, R.,
510: \pubjournal{\aap}{422}{L47}{2004}{}
511:
512: \bibitem[Wainscoat et al.(1992)]{Wainscoat1992}
513: Wainscoat, R. J., et al., \pubjournal{\apjs}{83}{111}{1992}{}
514:
515: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001)]{Weingartner2001}
516: Weingartner, J. C. \& Draine, B. T., \pubjournal{\apj}{548}{296}{2001}{}
517:
518: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2005)]{Z05}
519: Zhang, J.-L., Bi, X.-J., \& Hu, H.-B. 2005, preprint (astro-ph/0508236)
520:
521:
522: \end{thebibliography}
523:
524: \end{document}
525: