1: % iaus2esa.tex -- sample pages for Proceedings IAU Symposium document class
2: % (based on v1.0 cca2esam.tex)
3: % v1.04 released 17 May 2004 by TechBooks
4: %% small changes and additions made by KAvdH/IAU 4 June 2004
5: % Copyright (2004) International Astronomical Union
6:
7: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
8:
9: \documentclass{iaus}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: \title[Middle Age SNe] %% give here short title %%
13: {Supernovae astrophysics from Middle Age documents}
14:
15: \author[Polcaro \& Martocchia] %% give here short author list %%
16: {V. F. Polcaro$^1$%
17: \break \and A. Martocchia$^2$ \thanks{Present address: CESR, Toulouse, France},
18: }
19:
20: \affiliation{$^1$IASF-INAF, Rome, Italy \break email: polcaro@rm.iasf.cnr.it\\[\affilskip]
21: $^2$OAS, Strasbourg, France \break email: martok@quasar.u-strasbg.fr }
22:
23: \pubyear{2005}
24: \volume{230} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
25: %\pagerange{??--??}
26: \date{?? and in revised form ??}
27: %\setcounter{page}{??}
28: \jname{Proceedings Populations of High-Energy Sources in Galaxies}
29: \editors{ Evert J A Meurs \& Giuseppina Fabbiano, eds.}
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \maketitle
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35: The supernova explosion of 1054 AD, which originated the Crab Nebula and
36: Pulsar, is probably the astronomical event which has been
37: most deeply studied by means of
38: historical sources. However, many mysteries and
39: inconsistencies, both among the different sources and between what is
40: deduced by the historical records and the present day astronomical data,
41: are demanding extraordinary efforts by theoretical astrophysicists
42: in order to put all the data in a meaningful framework.
43: An accurate analysis of the
44: %%%most significant
45: historical sources,
46: like the one we are presenting here, may contribute to solve some
47: of these problems.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: Galactic Supernovae are rare events and their testimonies are extremely important for
51: astrophysics.
52: To date, seven astronomical events documented by historical texts are
53: believed to have been galactic supernovae (see Tab.1).
54: Information gathered from the historical
55: sources concerning all of these events have been used in some way in astrophysical studies,
56: though it is not always easy to extract quantitative data from ancient measurements.
57:
58: Before the Cepheid distance scale was extended by HST to include the host galaxies of many
59: SNe of Type Ia with good photometry, historical Type Ia SNe had been used to compute the
60: Hubble constant by combining their brightness at maximum with the modern distances to their
61: remnant in order to estimate the peak absolute magnitude. For instance, Schaefer (1996),
62: from a careful reconstruction of the Type Ia SN\,1572 light curve, obtained a peak
63: magnitude of V=-4.53$\pm$0.18, corresponding to an absolute magnitude of V$_o$=-18.64$\pm$0.31,
64: deriving H$_o$=66$\pm$12 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$: this is an
65: astonishing precise result, considering that it was obtained by using data gathered by naked
66: eye more than 400 years ago!
67:
68: However,
69: it may be risky to use historical astronomical data for astrophysics if they
70: have not been carefully checked from a historical point of view. The most indicative case is
71: the one of SN\,185, which was used for calibrating the brightness of
72: Type Ia SNe and hence for deriving the Hubble constant.
73: %%%However,
74: But, as it has been shown by Schaefer (1995), most likely this event was {\it not}
75: a supernova, but a transit of comet P/Swift-Tuttle -- indeed the derived value of H$_o$ was
76: the unrealistic one of H$_o$$\simeq$ 150 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$.
77:
78: \begin{table}\def~{\hphantom{0}}
79: \begin{center}
80: \caption{Possible historical Supernovae}
81: \label{tab:kd}
82: \hskip-8mm
83: \begin{tabular}{lccccl}\hline
84: Year & Date & mag & Remnant & SN Type & Source(s) \\
85: \hline%\\%[3pt]
86: 185 AD & Dec 7(?) & -2(?) & RWC 86(?) & Ia(?) Not a SN(?) & Chinese \\
87: 393 & Feb 27-28 & -3(?) & RX J1713.7-3946(?) & & Chinese\\
88: 1006 & Apr 30 & -7.5 & SNR 1006 & Ia
89: & Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, European\\
90: 1054 & Apr 11 & -4(?) & M1 (Crab) & II(?) Ib(?)
91: & Chinese, North American(?),\\
92: ~ & & & & & Arabic, Japanese, European \\
93: 1181 & Aug 6 & -1(?) & 3C 58(?) & II(?) Ib(?)
94: & Chinese, Japanese, European\\
95: 1572 & Nov 6 & -4 & Tycho SNR & Ia & Tycho Brahe, etc.\\
96: 1604 & Oct 9 & -3 & Kepler SNR & Ib(?) & Johannes Kepler, etc.\\
97: \hline
98: \end{tabular}
99: \end{center}
100: \end{table}
101:
102: The importance of a careful historical analysis of the historical sources before using
103: them for astrophysical purposes is further illustrated by the case of SN\,1054.
104:
105: \begin{table}\def~{\hphantom{0}}
106: \begin{center}
107: \caption{The historical records of SN1054 (revised version of Tab.1 from Collins et al., 1999).}
108: \label{tab:1054}
109: \hskip-8mm
110: \begin{tabular}{lcccccl}\hline
111: Date & MJD & Ref. & location & appearance as... & likely $m_{\rm{V}}$ & Notes \\
112: \hline%\\%[3pt]
113: 04/11/1054 & 6126 & a. & Fustat & {\it star} & ~ & Ibn Butlan \\
114: 04/11/1054 & 6126 & b. & Flanders & {\it bright disk at noon} & $\sim -7$ & ~ \\
115: 04/24/1054 & 6139 & c. & Ireland & {\it fiery pillar} & ~ & ~ \\
116: late April 1054 &~& d. & Rome & {\it bright light} & $< -3.5$ & ~ \\
117: 05/10/1054 & 6155 & e. & Liao Kingdom & {\it star} & ~ & Sun eclipse \\
118: 05/14/1054 & 6159 & f. & Armenia & {\it star} & ~ & ~ \\
119: late May 1054(?) & & g. & Italy & {\it very bright star} & ~ & ~ \\
120: late May 1054 &~& h. & Japan & {\it new star... as Jupiter} & $\sim -4.5$ & ~ \\
121: June 1054 & ~ & h. & Japan & {\it star} & ~ & ~ \\
122: $\sim$ 06/20/1054 &~& & & Crab in conjunction with Sun & ~ & not visible \\
123: 07/04/1054 ? & 6210 ? &i.& Song Empire & {\it star... like Venus} & $\sim -3.5$ & for 23 days ($^*$) \\
124: 08/27/1054 ? & 6264 ? &i.& Song Empire & {\it star... like Venus} & $\sim -3.5$ & for 23 days ($^*$) \\
125: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ \\
126: 1055 & ~ & a. & Constantinople & {\it star} & ~ & ~ \\
127: ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ & ~ \\
128: 04/17/1056 & 6863 & i. & Song Empire & {\it no more visible} & $> +6$ & ~ \\
129: \hline
130: \end{tabular}
131: \end{center}
132: {\tiny JD=MJD+2100000
133:
134: {\it References:} a. {\it Diary of Ibn Butlan} b. {\it Tractatus de ecclesia} c. {\it Irish Annals}
135: d. {\it De Obitu Sancti Leonis} e. {\it Sung-shih hsin-pien} f. {\it Etum Patmich}
136: g. {\it Rampona Chronicles} h. {\it Mei Getsuki} i. {\it Sung hui-yao}.
137:
138: ($^*$) Datation may have been falsified (or may just refer to the
139: communication to the Emperor), thus to be possibly shifted before. }
140: \end{table}
141:
142: The Song Empire sources were the first to be suggested as witnesses of the birth of the Crab
143: Nebula by Hubble (1928) and Mayall (1939).
144: It was found that they report a date when the Emperor was notified by the astronomer Yang Weide
145: about the 1054 "guest star" appearance (4$^{th}$ July), the length of
146: the period in which this star was visible in daylight (23 days), the date when the Emperor
147: was noticed of the last sighting (17$^{th}$ April 1056), and the star position in the sky.
148: These data made it possible to prove, though with some problems, the link between
149: the historical event and
150: the explosion of the precursor of the Crab Nebula (Mayall \& Oort, 1942; Duyvendak, 1942).
151: Nevertheless, another surely independent Chinese
152: source, the {\it K'i-tan-kuo-chih}, the history of the Kingdom of Liao written about 1350 AD,
153: refers only briefly to the "guest star",
154: stating that the event occurred
155: near the time of (or ``during'', following a more recent translation: Collins et al., 1999) a
156: total eclipse of the Sun. Duyvendak (1942) has shown
157: that the only important eclipse of that period occurred on 10$^{th}$ May 1054. This
158: evidence of an earlier
159: date of the SN\,1054 explosion has been often neglected
160: because of the contradiction with respect to the date reported by the
161: sources of the more developed Song Empire.
162: On the other hand, the latter texts give us just two photometric points: on 4$^{th}$ July 1054,
163: the star is defined "as luminous as Venus" and thus with V=-3.5$\pm$1; on 17$^{th}$ April
164: 1056, it is declared "no more visible" and thus having V$\geq$5.5. However, as
165: shown by Collins et al. (1999), these two photometric points are not compatible with the
166: average light curve of any kind of core-collapse supernova to have exploded on 4$^{th}$
167: July 1054: they could be only marginally fitted by the average light curve of a Type Ia
168: SN or by a Type II-L SN with its maximum on 20$^{th}$ June.
169: While the first hypothesis is ruled out by the presence of the Crab Pulsar, both
170: hypotheses are actually in contradiction with the Song sources themselves,
171: stating the appearance of the star on 4$^{th}$ July.
172: A problem is that Type II SNe may have significantly different luminosity at peak
173: (although their light curves have a very homogeneous behavior when the radioactive
174: nuclides decay becomes the dominant energy source: see e.g. Cappellaro \& Turatto, 2001,
175: for a general review of SN types); however, one cannot but assume that there is
176: something
177: wrong in the official Song Court report. And, indeed,
178: we have nowadays the possibility to consider the whole set of data concerning
179: the SN\,1054 event. It is witnessed, to our knowledge,
180: by at least 13 primary historical sources all over the world (see Table 2).
181: They are of course much different from
182: each other, both in clarity and in style; however, from
183: the appearance of the reported phenomena, it is often possible to guess the corresponding
184: visual magnitude of the SN\,1054.
185: We may therefore try reconstructing a rough light curve, by using the formulas which give
186: the naked eye visibility of astronomical objects (see e.g. Schaefer, 1993).
187: If we overlap to this curve the observed magnitudes of a few modern Type II SNe, scaled to the
188: distance of Crab Nebula (Fig.1, left), and a simple model of Type IIp SN
189: with production of 0.07
190: M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni (Collins et al, 1999; Sollerman et al., 2001; see Fig.1,
191: right), we can notice that the fit is
192: fairly good in both cases, though the historical data crowd
193: %%%obviously
194: in the high-luminosity segment of the curve, as obvious,
195: making an actual quantitative "best fit" procedure impossible.
196:
197: We notice that a single point is out from the fit: that is the one related to the very first
198: appearance of the SN, obtained from the {\it Tractatus de Ecclesia
199: S. Petri Aldenburgensi}, the chronicle of the Church of St. Peter in Oudembourg (in present day Belgium)
200: written by an anonymous monk or clerk some 20 years after the reported events. This is the
201: text translation, in full (for the latin original see: Guidoboni, Marmo \& Polcaro, 1994):
202:
203: \begin{figure}
204: \vspace{-4cm}
205: \hspace{-2.5cm}
206: \includegraphics{pm.eps}
207: \caption{\small {\it Left:} The historical light curve of the SN\,1054 overlapped to the photometric points of two modern type II SNe, reduced to the distance of the Crab Nebula. {\it Right:} the
208: same light curve compared to
209: a simple model of SN-IIp, assuming a production of 0.07 M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni.}
210: \label{fig:lightcurve}
211: \end{figure}
212:
213: {\it And the most blessed Pope Leo, after the beginning of the construction
214: of the aforementioned church of St. Peter, in the following year, on the 18th day
215: before the first of May, a Monday, around midday, happily departed this world.
216: And at the same hour as his leaving of the flesh, not only in Rome, where his
217: body lies, but also all over the world there appeared to men a circle in the sky
218: of extraordinary brightness which lasted for about half an hour. Perhaps the Lord
219: wished to say that he} [the Pope]
220: {\it was worthy to receive a crown in Heaven between those who love Him.}
221:
222: A deep textual analysis of this reference, one of the very few written by an actual eye-witness
223: of the SN\,1054, allowed the reconstruction of the exact date of the
224: reported phenomenon as the 11$^{th}$ April 1054, in agreement with the date that can be deduced from the
225: reports of the Arabic scholar Ibn Butlan (Guidoboni et al, 1994).
226: Furthermore, we can observe that
227: in this document, the author describes the phenomenon in neutral
228: terms, unaffected by any set of beliefs: the disk-like shape, the
229: intense brightness and the duration of the phenomenon are all
230: elements common to very different cultures. The author separates
231: the description of the phenomenon from his cautious
232: symbolic interpretation,
233: showing a clear awareness of the
234: different levels of discourse. The Flemish chronicler saw a bright
235: point source at $\sim$30$^o$ from the horizon:
236: in the foggy sky of Flanders in Spring, this would appear exactly like a disk.
237: Such a short optical transient, in the very first 30 minutes following the collapse
238: of a SN-II precursor, could very easily escape the detection even with the
239: nowadays observatories;
240: therefore, if confirmed by further evidences, this testimony could be very important
241: for the understanding of the physics of the core-collapse supernovae.
242:
243: Thus, if the SN\,1054 exploded on 11$^{th}$ April 1054
244: (as Guidoboni, Marmo \& Polcaro, 1992,
245: first suggested and Collins et al., 1999, demonstrated)
246: it was surely still visible, and very
247: impressive, near to the zenith of the Song capital Kaifeng
248: during the Sun eclipse of 10$^{th}$ May 1054.
249: From this sky configuration and
250: by using the standards of the Chinese astrology, which are perfectly documented,
251: it is easy to reconstruct the {\it omen} that must have been deduced at the time:
252: the Sun represents the Emperor (actually, the Emperor {\it was} the Sun);
253: the eclipse is a danger for the Emperor life;
254: moreover, the contemporary presence of the "guest star" indicates the loss of the
255: Heaven support; therefore the danger is unavoidable: {\it the Emperor will die}.
256: It is not surprising that such a terrible omen must have been subject to some form of
257: censorship: what the astronomer Yang Weide did -- most probably following the
258: wish of Emperor Renzong himself (Polcaro, 2005) -- was to censor all the references to the "guest
259: star" preceeding its conjunction with the Sun, which occurred
260: at the end of June .
261:
262: On the other hand, the Chief Astronomer of the Liao kingdom, whose king actually died one year
263: or so after the eclipse, had no reasons to mantain the secret concerning the "guest star"
264: visibility during the eclipse and the related omen.
265:
266: This is a clear example of the need of taking the historical and
267: cultural context into account, to derive meaningful scientific results
268: from the study of ancient reports.
269:
270: \vskip-6mm
271: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
272: \bibitem[Cappellaro \& Turatto (2001)]{C01}
273: Cappellaro, E., \& Turatto, M. 2001, in: Proc. of the Meeting
274: {\it The influence of binaries on stellar population studies}, Dordrecht:
275: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, Astrophysics and space science library (ASSL),
276: 264, 199
277: \bibitem[Collins et al. (1999)]{C99}
278: Collins, G.W., Claspy, W.P., Martin, J.C. 1999,
279: \textit{PASP}, 111, 871
280: \bibitem[Duyvendak (1942)]{D42}
281: Duyvendak, J.J.L. 1942,
282: \textit{PASP}, 4541, 645.
283: \bibitem[Guidoboni, Marmo \& Polcaro (1992)]{G92}
284: Guidoboni, E., Marmo, C., Polcaro, V. F. 1992,
285: \textit{Le Scienze}, 292, 24
286: \bibitem[Guidoboni, Marmo \& Polcaro (1994)]{G94}
287: Guidoboni, E., Marmo, C., Polcaro, V. F. 1994,
288: \textit{Mem. SAIt}, 65, 623
289: \bibitem[Hubble (1928)]{H28}
290: Hubble, E. 1928,
291: \textit{PASP Leaflet}, 1, 14
292: \bibitem[Mayall (1939)]{Ma39}
293: Mayall, N.U. 1939,
294: \textit{PASP Leaflet} 3, 119, 145
295: \bibitem[Mayall \& Oort (1942)]{MO42}
296: Mayall, N.U., Oort, J.M. 1942,
297: \textit{PASP}, 54, 95
298: \bibitem[Polcaro 2005]{P05}
299: Polcaro, V.F. 2005, in: \textit{Proc. of SEAC 2005}, Isili, Jun 28--Jul 3, 2005
300: \bibitem[Schaefer (1993)]{Sh93}
301: Schaefer, B.E. 1993,
302: \textit{Vistas in Astronomy}, 36, 311
303: \bibitem[Schaefer (1995)]{Sh95}
304: Schaefer, B.E. 1995,
305: \textit{AJ}, 110, 1973
306: \bibitem[Schaefer (1996)]{Sh96}
307: Schaefer, B.E. 1996,
308: \textit{ApJ}, 459, 438
309: \bibitem[Sollerman et al. (2001)]{S01}
310: Sollerman, J., Kozma, C., Lundqvist, P. 2001, \textit{A\&A}, 366, 1971
311: \end{thebibliography}
312: \end{document}
313:
314: