1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: \newcommand{\myemail}{amber.straughn@asu.edu}
4: \shortauthors{Straughn et al.}
5: \shorttitle{Tadpole Galaxies in HUDF}
6:
7:
8:
9: \newcommand{\etal} {\mbox{et al.\,}}
10: \newcommand{\ie} {\mbox{i.e.}}
11: \newcommand{\eg} {\mbox{e.g.}}
12: \newcommand{\Mo} {\mbox{M$_{\odot}$}}
13: \newcommand{\cle} {\ensuremath{\lesssim}}
14: \newcommand{\cge} {\ensuremath{\gtrsim}}
15: \newcommand{\absPA} {\ensuremath{|{\rm PA}|}}
16:
17: \newcommand{\fig}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}
18: \newcommand{\tab}[1]{Table~\ref{#1}}
19:
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Tracing Galaxy Assembly: Tadpole Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field}
24:
25: \author{Amber N. Straughn, Seth H. Cohen, Russell E. Ryan Jr, Nimish P. Hathi,
26: Rogier A. Windhorst, \& Rolf A. Jansen}
27:
28: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State
29: University, Tempe, AZ 85281; \myemail}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: In the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) an abundance of galaxies is seen
33: with a knot at one end plus an extended tail, resembling a
34: tadpole. These ``tadpole galaxies'' appear dynamically unrelaxed ---
35: presumably in an early merging stage --- where tidal interactions
36: likely created the distorted knot-plus-tail morphology. Here we
37: systematically select tadpole galaxies from the HUDF and study their
38: properties as a function of their photometric redshifts. In a
39: companion HUDF variability study presented in this issue, Cohen \etal
40: (2005) revealed a total of 45 variable objects believed to be Active
41: Galactic Nuclei (AGN). Here we show that this faint AGN sample has no
42: overlap with the tadpole galaxy sample, as predicted by recent
43: theoretical work. The tadpole morphology --- combined with the lack
44: of overlap with the variable objects --- supports the idea that these
45: galaxies are in the process of an early-stage merger event, i.e., at a
46: stage that likely precedes the ``turn-on'' of any AGN component and
47: the onset of any point-source variability. We show that the redshift
48: distribution of tadpole galaxies follows that of the general field
49: galaxy population, indicating that --- if most of the tadpole galaxies
50: are indeed dynamically young --- the process of galaxy assembly
51: generally kept up with the reservoir of available field galaxies as a
52: function of cosmic epoch. These new observational results highlight
53: the importance of merger-driven processes throughout cosmic history,
54: and are consistent with a variety of theoretical and numerical
55: predictions.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords{galaxies: formation --- galaxies: mergers --- galaxies: active
60: galactic nuclei --- cosmology}
61:
62:
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64:
65: \section{Introduction} \label{introduction}
66: The origin of disk galaxies has long been thought to occur through the
67: process of dissipational collapse in a Cold Dark Matter (CDM) universe
68: (White \& Rees, 1978). Within this paradigm, hierarchical clustering
69: (Navarro, Frenk, \& White 1997) produces dark matter halos in which
70: dissipational collapse of the residual gas occurs. The resulting
71: disks retain the kinematic information of their host dark matter
72: potential wells (Blumenthal \etal 1986). Recent numerical simulations
73: have resolved some long-standing discrepancies in the standard
74: dissipational collapse scenario by including previously-neglected
75: energetic feedback from central supermassive black holes during galaxy
76: merging events (e.g. Robertson \etal 2005). In particular, they
77: emphasize the relationship between the central black hole mass and the
78: stellar velocity dispersion, which confirms the link between the
79: growth of black holes and their host galaxies (di Matteo, Springel, \&
80: Hernquist 2005; Springel, di Matteo, \& Hernquist 2005ab). These
81: theoretical predictions place merger-driven scenarios on the
82: forefront, suggesting that galaxy merger activity is a crucial element
83: in a cosmological description of the Universe. The present study
84: provides observational support for many of these theoretical
85: predictions.
86:
87: A large abundance of galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF;
88: Beckwith \etal 2005) appear dynamically unrelaxed, which suggests they
89: must play an important role in the overall picture of galaxy
90: evolution. In particular, we notice many galaxies with a
91: knot-plus-tail morphology. This particular morphology constitutes a
92: large, well-defined subset of the irregular and peculiar objects in
93: the HUDF that is uniquely measurable as described in Section 3. The
94: selection of this specific morphology also ties closely to the
95: numerical simulations described above (di Matteo, Springel, \&
96: Hernquist 2005; Springel, di Matteo, \& Hernquist 2005ab), which
97: predict a stage of merger-driven galaxy evolution that closely
98: resembles these tadpole galaxies in a distinct phase that does not yet
99: show AGN activity (as discussed further in Section 7). In particular,
100: this morphology appears to represent an \emph{early} stage in the
101: merging of 2 nearly-equal mass galaxies. We systematically selected
102: galaxies displaying this knot-plus-tail morphology from the HUDF; a
103: representative sample of tadpoles is shown in \fig{fig:tp1} (details
104: of sample selection are given in Section 3). All the selected tadpole
105: galaxies contain the asymmetric, pointlike source with a diffuse tail
106: morphology, some with multiple knots; all of which we believe are
107: undergoing recent interactions. They are mostly linear structures,
108: some resembling the ``chain'' galaxies first reported by Cowie, Hu, \&
109: Songaila (1995). When more than two clumps come together, these
110: objects may be more akin to the luminous diffuse objects and clump
111: clusters (Conselice \etal 2004; Elmegreen, Elmegreen, \& Sheets 2004;
112: Elemegreen, Elmegreen, \& Hirst 2004), or other types of irregular
113: objects (van den Bergh 2002). Elmegreen \etal (2005) visually
114: classify 97 HUDF galaxies (down to 10 pixels in size) as ``tadpoles''
115: and 126 as ``double-clump.'' Some of the galaxies classified by
116: Elmegreen \etal as ``double-clump'' were identified as tadpoles by our
117: code, due either to the unresolved nature of one clump (which would
118: have been detected as a ``tail'' in our analysis) or to the diffuse
119: nature of one end of the object. Since our goal in selecting these
120: tadpoles was to sample galaxies that had \emph{recently} undergone
121: interaction, inclusion of some of these ``double-clumps'' is
122: warranted. One high redshift object in our sample has been studied in
123: detail by Rhoads \etal (2005). A few objects with multiple knots are
124: detected by our selection software, but the majority have a single
125: prominant knot with an extended tail.
126:
127: In this paper, we present the photometric redshift distribution of
128: tadpole galaxies, and compare it with the redshift distribution of the
129: general field galaxy population. This paper is organized as
130: follows. In \S 2, we describe the HUDF data, and in \S 3 the tadpole
131: sample selection. In \S 4, we discuss why the majority of tadpole
132: galaxies are likely \emph{not} chance alignments, but instead mostly
133: dynamically young objects. In \S 5, we discuss their redshift
134: distribution, in \S 6 their relation to galaxy assembly, and in \S 7
135: their possible relation to AGN growth.
136:
137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
138:
139: \section{Hubble Ultra Deep Field Data} \label{data}
140:
141: The Hubble Ultra Deep Field is a 400 orbit survey in four filters
142: carried out using the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) aboard the
143: \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} (\emph{HST}) of a single field centered
144: on RA(J2000)=$03^{\rm h} 32^{\rm m} 39.\!\!^{\rm s}0$,
145: Dec(J2000)=$-27^{\circ} 47' 29\farcs1$. The 144-orbit F775W ($i'$)
146: image is deepest, followed by F850LP ($z'$; 144 orbits), F606W ($V$;
147: 56 orbits), and F435W ($B$; 56 orbits). The HUDF reaches $\sim$1.0 mag
148: deeper in $B$ and $V$ and $\sim$1.5 mag deeper in $i'$ than the
149: equivalent filters in the Hubble Deep Field (Williams \etal
150: 1996). From the $\sim$10,000 objects detected in the HUDF (Koekemoer
151: 2004), we will select the sample of tadpole galaxies and analyze their
152: properties using the $i'$-band image, because it provides the highest
153: sensitivity of the four filters. Yan \& Windhorst (2004b) discuss how
154: this results in a bias against objects at z$\,\gtrsim5.5$. This bias
155: is small, and only concerns the high redshift tail of the redshift
156: distribution. Note, however, that tadpole galaxies at z$\,\simeq5.5$
157: \emph{do} exist (\eg, Rhoads \etal 2005).
158:
159:
160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
161:
162: \section{Tadpole Sample Selection} \label{sampleselection}
163:
164: The first step in this analysis is to systematically select the
165: galaxies that have the characteristic tadpole shape. We selected
166: sources in the F775W ($i'$) band to $i'_{AB}=28.0$ mag using
167: \texttt{SExtractor} (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996). The objects of interest
168: all have a bright ``knot'' at one end with an extended ``tail'' at the
169: other. \texttt{SExtractor} selects objects from an image based on
170: different input parameters, and adjusting them results in the desired
171: selection of sources. The crucial parameter at this stage is
172: \textsf{\small DEBLEND\_MINCONT}, which governs the manner in which
173: nearby peaks in flux are considered part of a single object and thus
174: are counted as one source. With the deblending parameter set to a high
175: value, \texttt{SExtractor} will separate nearby flux maxima into
176: separate sources. In contrast, when the deblending is set to a low
177: value, the program will count the nearby maxima largely as one
178: source. Two different source catalogs are thus generated: the highly
179: deblended catalog will contain many point-like sources, including the
180: knots of potential tadpole galaxies. The catalog with low-deblending
181: will contain extended sources, including the tadpole galaxies'
182: tails. The catalogs contain many more sources than the desired ones,
183: and the correctly shaped objects must be selected from these two
184: initial catalogs. The desired tadpole galaxies have a nearly
185: unresolved knot or concentration, and an extended tail, so these types
186: of sources must be selected from the initial catalog, and related
187: spatially such that they represent real objects. All of the following
188: procedures were performed using IDL.
189:
190: Both input \texttt{SExtractor} catalogs, described above, contain the
191: following information about the selected sources: $x$ and $y$ pixel
192: locations, length of the semi-major and semi-minor axis ($a$ and $b$)
193: of \texttt{SExtractor} ellipses, and the angle ($\theta$) of the
194: semi-major axis from north through east. The following input
195: parameters were calibrated using a training set of tadpole galaxies
196: that were manually selected by visual inspection of portions of the
197: HUDF. First, the knots of the tadpole galaxies were selected by
198: setting an axis-ratio limit. A ``knot'' was defined to be a source
199: from the highly deblended catalog with an axis ratio greater (\ie,
200: rounder) than some critical value (in our case, $b/a>0.70$). In the
201: same way, the ``tails'' needed to be elongated objects, so a similar
202: procedure was performed on the objects from the catalog with
203: low-deblending, but with the criterion that their $b/a< 0.43$. The two
204: new lists of correctly shaped objects had to be related physically on
205: the image, thus, a new set of objects was defined where a knot was
206: within a certain distance of the geometrical center of a tail. This
207: distance was taken to be $<4a$ (in semi-major axis units of the
208: tail). We also required that the knot be at least $>0.1a$ from the
209: tail's geometrical center, since we are searching for asymmetric
210: objects, and want to eliminate upfront as many of the true edge-on
211: mid-type spiral disks as possible. The objects also must have the knot
212: near one end of the tail, and this was accomplished by selecting only
213: those tails and knots that had a relative angle $\theta$ --- measured
214: with respect to the semi-major axis of the tail --- that was
215: $\leq20^{\circ}$. This step prevented including knots and tails that
216: were close together on the image, but not physically part of the same
217: galaxy.
218:
219:
220: \begin{table}
221: \caption{Galaxy Selector Input Parameters\tablenotemark{\dag}}
222: \label{table:param}
223: \begin{tabular*}{0.48\textwidth}
224: {@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lr}
225: \hline
226: \hline
227: \multicolumn{1}{l}{Parameter} & \multicolumn{1}{r}{Value}\\
228: $ $&$ $\\
229: \hline
230: $b/a$ limit: knots & $>$0.70 \\
231: $b/a$ limit: tails & $<$0.43 \\
232: Distance to center (in a-axis units) & $<$4 \\
233: Angle difference $\theta$ (tail-knot) & $\leq20^{\circ}$ \\
234: Total number of tadpoles automatically selected & 154 \\
235: DEBLEND\_MINCONT (knots) & 0.000005 \\
236: DEBLEND\_MINCONT (tails) & 0.1 \\
237: \hline
238: \tablenotetext{\dag}{Table 1 lists \texttt{SExtractor} parameters used
239: in the tadpole sample selection. $b$ \& $a$ are semi-major and
240: semi-minor axis lengths of the ellipses used in selecting tadpole
241: knots and tails. DEBLEND\_MINCONT (knots/tails) is the
242: \texttt{SExtractor} parameter that governs in what manner nearby peaks
243: in flux are considered part of a single object and are thus counted as
244: one source.}
245: \end{tabular*}
246: \end{table}
247:
248:
249: These selection criteria provided a list of the tadpole-shaped
250: galaxies. The final number of tadpoles selected depended on the
251: selection program's input parameters for the limiting axis-ratios, the
252: distance at which the knots and tails were considered related, and the
253: angle difference between the knot and the semi-major axis of the
254: tail. The values of these parameters are given in Table 1. With these
255: values, the tadpole galaxy selection program detected 154 sources
256: total. This sample was then refined as follows.
257:
258: A large majority of the 154 tadpole galaxy candidates selected had the
259: characteristic elongated knot-plus-tail morphology, although there
260: were some anomalies. In total, 14 (9\%) obvious mis-detections were
261: visually rejected because they were very faint, on the edge of the
262: image, or in the outskirts of large face-on spiral galaxies, where
263: both knotty and diffuse regions are common and spatially close
264: together. A visual examination of the field also produced 25 more
265: tadpole galaxies not found by the selector program due to the
266: inability of \texttt{SExtractor} to correctly separate particular
267: point-like sources within these galaxies. These extra selected
268: tadpole objects visually obeyed the morphological criteria that were
269: used to define the main sample. Our total final sample thus contains
270: 165 tadpole galaxies, a subset of which is shown in \fig{fig:tp1}. In
271: our final sample, less than 10\% of the selected tadpoles appear as
272: normal edge-on disk galaxies; the vast majority have the highly
273: asymmetric morphology. In terms of visual vs.\ automatic selection,
274: we find our sample to be about 91\% (140/154) reliable and about 86\%
275: (154/179) complete. The final set of 165 tadpoles galaxies will now
276: be studied as a separate class of dynamically unrelaxed objects and
277: compared to the general field galaxy population in the HUDF.
278:
279: \begin{figure*}
280: \centerline{\epsfxsize=\hsize{\epsfbox{f1.ps}}}
281: \caption{F775W ($i'$) band mosaic of a subset of the tadpole galaxy
282: sample in the HUDF. Stamps retain the orientation of the HUDF; north
283: is toward the top of the page and east is to the left. Index numbers
284: are displayed in the upper-left corner of the stamps; photometric
285: redshifts are given in upper-right corners. Parentheses indicate
286: photometric redshifts with errors $>$1 based on HyperZ calculations.
287: Stamps are 3 arcsec on a side. A table of coordinates for the entire
288: tadpole sample is given in Section 3; the entire sample of 165
289: tadpoles appears in color in the online supplement. The vast majority
290: of our tadpole sample contains the distinctive knot-plus-tail
291: morphology, while sample contamination by normal (non-interacting)
292: edge-on disk galaxies is less than 10\%. }\label{fig:tp1}
293: \end{figure*}
294:
295:
296:
297: \section{Why Tadpole Galaxies are Not Chance Alignments}
298: \label{whyyoung}
299:
300: In this section we demonstrate that these tadpole galaxies are likely
301: not chance alignnments of tails and unrelated knots. We first select
302: \emph{all} elongated diffuse structures (``tails'') in the HUDF, and
303: then measure the angle $\theta$ of the nearest off-centered knot
304: within a radius $r\leq 4a$ ($\leq 2''$). Chance alignments of
305: unrelated tails and knots would show a random distribution of angles;
306: however, \fig{fig:theta} shows that there clearly is an excess of
307: knots near $|\theta|\simeq 0^\circ$. The excess peak contains 154
308: knots, while the average number of knots with $|\theta|\ge 10^\circ$
309: is $\sim$15 per $5^\circ \theta$-bin. \fig{fig:theta} thus shows a
310: significant overabundance of knots near the end of elongated diffuse
311: structures as compared to randomly distributed knots. Hence, this
312: physically meaningful result suggests that the majority of tadpole
313: galaxies are not just chance alignments of unrelated knots. Instead,
314: we believe they are mostly linear structures which are undergoing
315: interactions. When compared to models of galaxy mergers (di Matteo,
316: Springel, \& Hernquist 2005; Springel, di Matteo, \& Hernquist 2005;
317: Robertson \etal 2005, Hopkins \etal 2005), these objects strongly
318: resemble dynamically young objects in the early stages of merging.
319: \begin{figure}
320: \epsscale{1.2}
321: \plotone{f2.ps}
322: \caption{Distribution of (the absolute value of) angles ($\theta$) of
323: all off-centered knots found within a radius $r\leq 4a$ ($\leq 2''$)
324: from the center of each elongated diffuse structure in the HUDF,
325: showing a clear excess of knots near $|\theta|\simeq 0^\circ$.}
326: \label{fig:theta}
327: \end{figure}
328:
329:
330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
331:
332: \section{The Redshift Distribution of Tadpole Galaxies}
333: \label{redshiftdistribution}
334:
335: To investigate the occurrence of tadpole galaxies throughout the
336: history of the universe, we calculate photometric redshifts of all
337: HUDF galaxies to $i'_{AB}=28.0$ mag. All photometric redshifts were
338: calculated from the HUDF $BViz$(+$JH$) photometry using HyperZ
339: (Bolzonella \etal 2000). In order to investigate associated redshift
340: errors, we compared our photometric redshifts to published
341: spectroscopic redshifts for CDFS 70 objects. We find an rms scatter of
342: 0.15 for the fractional photometric redshift error
343: $\delta$=(photoz-specz)/(1+specz) if all 70 objects are included, and
344: 0.10 when we reject a few of the most obvious outliers. This result
345: is fully consistent with prior claims of photometric redshift accuracy
346: in the literature (Lanzetta \etal 1997, Mobasher \etal 2004). The
347: accuracy of our photometric redshift estimates depends on the accuracy
348: of the measured magnitudes in each of the available filters. It also
349: is largely independent of the shape of an object (although magnitude
350: errors for more extended, lower surface brightness objects tend to be
351: somewhat larger than those for more concentrated, higher surface
352: brightness objects of the same total magnitude).
353:
354: The redshift distribution of all galaxies in the HUDF (solid line in
355: \fig{fig:hist}) is as expected, with the primary peak at
356: $0.5\leq\,$z$\,\leq1.0$ and a generally declining tail at
357: z$\,\simeq4$--5. These trends were also seen in the general HDF
358: redshift distribution of faint field galaxies (Driver \etal 1998).
359: Also apparent is a lack of objects at z$\,\simeq1$--2 due to
360: unavailable UV spectral features crossing the $BViz$(+$JH$)
361: filters. This occurs because the HUDF does not have deep enough F300W
362: or $U$-band (ultra-violet) data, unlike the situation in the HDF
363: (Williams \etal 1996). This redshift bias, however, is the \emph{same}
364: for both the tadpole and the general field galaxy populations. In
365: \fig{fig:hist}, the tadpole galaxy distribution is multiplied by a
366: factor of 16 for best comparison with that of the field galaxies.
367: Within the available statistics, the redshift distribution shape of
368: the tadpole galaxies follows that of the general field galaxies quite
369: closely. This suggests that if tadpole galaxies are indeed dynamically
370: young objects related to early-stage mergers, they may occur in the
371: same proportion to the field galaxy population at all
372: redshifts. Tadpole galaxies may therefore be good tracers of the
373: galaxy assembly process. The ratio of the two redshift distributions
374: N(z) was calculated as well, and the resulting percentage of tadpole
375: galaxies is plotted in \fig{fig:per} as a function of redshift
376: together with the statistical errors. Overall, the percentage of
377: tadpole galaxies is roughly constant at $\sim$6\% with redshift to
378: within the statistical errors for the redshift range probed in our
379: study ($0.1\leq$z$\leq4.5$).
380:
381:
382:
383:
384: \begin{figure}
385: \epsscale{1.2}
386: \plotone{f3.ps}
387: \caption{Photometric redshift distribution of galaxies in the
388: HUDF. The solid black histogram shows the redshift distribution of all
389: HUDF field galaxies to $i'_{AB}=28.0$, while the dashed histogram
390: shows the redshift distribution of the tadpole galaxies. The latter
391: was multiplied by 16$\times$ for best comparison of its shape with the
392: redshift distribution of the field galaxies.}\label{fig:hist}
393: \end{figure}
394:
395: \begin{figure}
396: \epsscale{1.2}
397: \plotone{f4.ps}
398: \caption{Percentage of total galaxies that are tadpoles is plotted as
399: a function of photometric redshift. Within the statistical errors, on
400: average about 6\% of all galaxies are seen as tadpoles at all
401: redshifts.}\label{fig:per}
402: \end{figure}
403:
404:
405: \section{Tadpole Galaxies as Tracers of Galaxy Assembly} \label{tracers}
406:
407: The fact that about 6\% of all field galaxies are seen in the tadpole
408: stage is a measurement with potentially important consequences. In
409: light of simulations by Springel \etal (2005) that predict a
410: tadpole-like stage $\simeq$0.7 Gyr after a major merger begins, we
411: suggest that this particular tadpole morphology represents an
412: early-merger stage of two galaxies with comparable mass. If this 6\%
413: indicates the fraction of time that an average galaxy in the HUDF
414: spends in an early-merger stage during its lifetime, and if most of
415: these low-luminosity objects started forming the bulk of their stars
416: at the end of the reionization epoch at z$\simeq6-7$ (e.g. Yan \&
417: Windhorst 2004a, 2004b), then each galaxy would spend about 6\% of
418: 12.9 Gyr (i.e. 0.8 Gyr) since z$\simeq7$ in a distinctly recognizable
419: merger or tadpole stage. At the median redshift at which the tadpoles
420: are seen (z$_{med}$ $\simeq1.6$; see \fig{fig:hist}), each object is
421: then seen at an age of about 4 Gyr if born at z$\simeq$7. Each tadpole
422: is $\simeq1$" (or $\simeq8$ kpc) across (\fig{fig:tp1}), and given the
423: fluxes measured, each clump in a tadpole has roughly M$\,\simeq
424: 10^8$--$10^9\,\Mo$ in stars (see, e.g., Papovich, Dickinson, \&
425: Ferguson 2001 who estimated stellar masses of lyman break galaxies).
426: For these rough estimates of their physical parameters, the freefall
427: timescale for each tadpole is roughly $\tau\cle$ (few$\times
428: 10^7$)--$10^8$ years, or $\simeq$6\% of the galaxy lifetime at that
429: redshift. Hence, if every galaxy is seen in a tadpole stage for
430: $\simeq$0.8 Gyr of its lifetime, then it may have undergone
431: $\sim$10-30 mergers during its lifetime. During the early stage of
432: each merger, it would be temporarily seen as a tadpole. More complex
433: mergers may lead to irregular/peculiar and train-wreck type objects
434: and the luminous diffuse objects or clump clusters, which are among
435: the type of objects that dominate the galaxy counts at faint
436: magnitudes (Driver \etal 1998). In this paper, we limit the sample
437: selection to two clumps passing by each other, which we believe leads
438: to the more uniquely classifiable tadpole morphology. Given that
439: tadpoles only trace a certain type and stage of merging galaxies, the
440: above statistics are likely a lower limit on the number of all
441: mergers. In summary, each galaxy seen today may have had of order
442: one- to two- dozen mergers since most of its Population II stars were
443: born at z$\simeq$7, and given the small masses and short merger
444: timescales involved, would then be seen as tadpole galaxies for about
445: 6\% of their life-time.
446:
447: \fig{fig:per} suggests that tadpole galaxies --- if indeed dynamically
448: young objects --- appear to occur in the same proportion to the field
449: galaxy population at all redshifts probed in this study. Tadpole
450: galaxies may therefore be good tracers of the process of galaxy
451: assembly. This implies that the process of galaxy assembly --- as
452: traced by tadpole galaxies --- keeps up with the reservoir of
453: available galaxies as a function of redshift for
454: $0.1\!\leq\!z\!\leq\!4.5$. Our result is in excellent agreement
455: with the predictions of Robertson \etal (2005) that describe a
456: merger-driven scenario to build up disk galaxies, and is consistent
457: with Rhoads \etal (2005) who conclude that their z=5.4 galaxy (tadpole
458: \# 165 in Table 2) is strongly indicative of a galaxy in assembly.
459:
460:
461: \section{Relation between Tadpole Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei}
462:
463:
464: In a companion paper in this issue, Cohen \etal (2005) present a study
465: of the variable objects in the HUDF which have a point source
466: component with a measurably variable flux on timescales of 0.4--3.5
467: months, which roughly corresponds to 0.5--5.5 weeks in the rest-frame
468: at the median redshift of the sample (z$_{med}$ $\simeq1.5-2$). In
469: particular, they found 45 plausibly variable objects among 4644
470: galaxies to $i'_{AB}=28.0$ mag. They argue that these objects are
471: most likely variable because they host weak AGN. Sometimes these AGN
472: are in the galaxy center, but often they occur off-center in a
473: dynamically unrelaxed system. This prompts the question: What fraction
474: of tadpole galaxies contains a variable weak AGN in its knots? This is
475: a critical issue, because it is widely believed that the process of
476: merging in galaxies can also disturb the inner accretion disk around
477: the supermassive black hole (SMBH) and switch on the AGN. Among our
478: 165 tadpole galaxies, none coincide with the sample of 45 variable
479: objects or with the x-ray sources in the Chandra Deep Field South
480: (Alexander, D.M. \etal 2005). Recent state-of-the-art hydrodynamical
481: models (di Matteo, Springel, \& Hernquist 2005; Springel, di Matteo,
482: \& Hernquist 2005; Hopkins \etal 2005) suggest that during (major)
483: mergers, the black hole accretion rate peaks considerably after the
484: merger started, and after the star formation rate (SFR) has
485: peaked. Specifically, their models suggest that, for massive galaxies,
486: a tadpole stage is seen typically about 0.7 Gyr after the merger
487: started, but $\sim$0.9 Gyr before the SMBH accretes most of its mass,
488: which is when the galaxy displays strong AGN activity. Since the
489: lifetimes of QSO's and radio-galaxies are known to be
490: $\cle\,$(few$\times 10^7$)--$10^8$ years (Martini, P. 2004, Grazian
491: \etal 2004), these hydrodynamical models thus imply that the AGN stage
492: is expected to occur considerably \emph{after} (i.e., $\ge$1 Gyr) the
493: early-merger event during which the galaxy is seen in the tadpole
494: stage. The observed lack of overlap between the tadpole galaxies and
495: the AGN sample in the HUDF provide direct observational support for
496: this prediction. Recent studies by Grogin \etal (2005) find asymmetry
497: (A) values that are similar between AGN and non-AGN samples; this
498: result is consistent with our study in light of the theoretical models
499: mentioned above, which indicate that AGN activity is seen only well
500: \emph{after} the merger has taken place and the galaxy has settled
501: into a more dynamically relaxed state. In addition, Hopkins \etal
502: (2005) have quantified the timescales that quasars will be visible
503: during merging events, noting that for a large fraction of the
504: accretion time, the quasar is heavily obscured. In particular, their
505: simulations show that during an early merging phase --- our observed
506: tadpole phase --- the intrinsic quasar luminosity peaks, but is
507: completely obscured. Only after feedback from the central quasar
508: clears out the gas will the object become visible as an AGN. This
509: should be observable by the Spitzer Space Telescope in the
510: mid-infrared (IR) as a correspondingly larger fraction of IR-selected
511: obscured faint QSO's.
512:
513: In conclusion, tadpole galaxies are a class of easily-identifiable,
514: dynamically young objects that exist throughout the history of the
515: Universe and are good tracers of galaxy assembly. They provide strong
516: observational support for the validity of recent numerical
517: simulations, and highlight the importance of mergers to the process of
518: galaxy assembly and AGN growth.
519:
520:
521:
522: \section{Acknowledgements}\label{Acknowledgements}
523:
524: We thank the STScI staff, and in particular Steve Beckwith, Ray Lucas,
525: and Massimo Stiavelli, for their persistent efforts to implement the
526: Hubble Ultra Deep Field in the best possible way. This research was
527: partially funded by NASA grants GO-9793.08-A and AR-10298.01-A,
528: awarded by STScI, which is operated by AURA for NASA under contract
529: NAS 5-26555; as well as by the NASA Space Grant program at ASU, and
530: the Harriet G. Jenkins Predoctoral Fellowship Program.
531:
532:
533: \begin{thebibliography}{}
534: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(2003)]{ax03} Alexander, D.M. et al. 2003, AJ 126, 539
535: \bibitem[Bolzonella, M., Miralles, J., Pello, R. (2000)]{hyper} Bolzonella, M., Miralles, J., Pello, R. 2000, A\&A, 363, 476
536: \bibitem[Barger et al. (2003)]{bar03} Barger, A.J. et al. 2003 ApJL, 584, L61
537: \bibitem[Beckwith et al. (2005)]{beck05} Beckwith, S., et al. 2005, AJ, in preparation
538: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{sex} Bertin, E. \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 363
539: \bibitem[]{414} Blumenthal, G., Faber, S., Flores, R., Primack, J. 1986, ApJ 301, 27
540: \bibitem[]{415} Cohen, S. \etal 2005, ApJ (this volume)
541: \bibitem[Conselice, Bershady \& Jangren 2000]{con00} Conselice, Bershady \& Jangren 2000, ApJ 529, 886
542: \bibitem[Conselice et al. 2003]{con03} Conselice, C. et al. 2003, AJ 126, 1183
543: \bibitem[Conselice et al. 2004]{con04} Conselice, C. et al 2004, ApJL 600, L139
544: \bibitem[Cowie et al. 1996]{cow96} Cowie, L., Songaila, A., Hu, E., \& Cohen, J.G. 1996, AJ 112, 839
545: \bibitem[Cowie, Hu, \& Songaila 1995]{cow95} Cowie, L., Hu, E., \& Songaila, A. 1995, AJ 110, 1576
546: \bibitem[di Matteo, Springel, \& Hernquist 2005]{dimatteo05} Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., \& Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604
547: \bibitem[Driver et al. (1998)]{dri98} Driver, S., Windhorst, R., Griffiths, R. 1998 ApJ 453, 48
548: \bibitem[Elmegreen, Elmegreen, \& Hirst 2004]{elm04a} Elmegreen, D., Elmegreen, B., \& Hirst, A. 2004, ApJL 604, L21
549: \bibitem[Elmegreen, Elmegreen, \& Sheets 2004]{elm04b} Elmegreen, D., Elmegreen, B., \& Sheets, C. 2004, ApJ 603, 74
550: \bibitem[Elmegreen et al. 2005]{elm05} Elmegreen, D., Elmegreen, B., Rubin, D., Schaffer, M. 2005, ApJ 631, 85
551: \bibitem[]{425} Grazian, A. \etal 2004, AJ 127, 592
552: \bibitem[]{426} Grogin, N. \etal 2005, ApJL 627, 97
553: \bibitem[]{427} Hopkins, P., Hernquist, L., Martini, P., Cox, T., Robertson, B., Di Matteo, T., Springel, V. 2005, ApJL, 625, L71
554: \bibitem[Hopkins, P., Hernquist, L., Cox, T., di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., Springel, V. 2005] {}Hopkins, P., Hernquist, L., Cox, T., di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., Springel, V. 2005, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0506398)
555: \bibitem[Koekemoer (2004)]{koe04} Koekemoer, A. 2004, ``The Hubble Ultra Deep Field ACS/WFC Combined Images--V1.0'' http://cadcwww.dao.nrc.ca/udf/acs-wfc/h\_udf\_wfc\_Readme.txt
556: \bibitem[]{lan} Lanzetta, K.M. \etal 1997, Proceedings of the STScI 1997 May Symposium (astro-ph/9709166)
557: \bibitem[]{430} Martini, P. 2004, Carnegie Obs. Astrophys. Ser. 1, Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 170
558: \bibitem[]{mobasher} Mobasher, B. \etal 2004, ApJL 600, 167
559: \bibitem[]{431} Navarro, J., Frenk, C., White, S. 1997, ApJ 490, 493
560: \bibitem[Odewahn et al. 1996]{odewahn96} Odewahn, S. et al. 1996, ApJL 472, L13
561: \bibitem[Odewahn et al. 2002]{odewahn02} Odewahn, S. et al. 2002, ApJ 568, 539
562: \bibitem[]{papovich} Papovich, C., Dickinson, M, \& Ferguson, H. 2001, ApJ 559, 620
563: \bibitem[Rhoads et al. 2005]{rhoads05} Rhoads et al. 2005, ApJ 621, 582
564: \bibitem[]{435} Robertson, B. \etal 2005, ApJL, submitted (astro-ph/0503369)
565: \bibitem[Springel, Di Matteo \& Hernquist 2005a]{springel05} Springel, V., di Matteo, T., \& Hernquist, L. 2005a, ApJ, 620, 79
566: \bibitem[Springel et al. 2005]{sp2} Springel, V., di Matteo, T., Hernquist, L. 2005b, MNRAS 361, 776
567: \bibitem[van den Bergh 2002]{vdBergh02} van den Bergh, S., 2002, PASP 114, 797
568: \bibitem[]{438} White, S.D.M. \& Rees, M.J. 1978, MNRAS 183, 341
569: \bibitem[Williams, R. et al 1996]{williams96} Williams, R. et al. 1996, AJ 112, 1335
570: \bibitem[Windhorst, R.A. et al. 2002]{windhorst02} Windhorst, R. et al. 2002, ApJS 143, 113
571: \bibitem[Yan, H., \& Windhorst, R.A. 2004a]{441} Yan, H., \& Windhorst, R. 2004, ApJL 600, L01
572: \bibitem[Yan, H., \& Windhorst, R.A. 2004b]{442} Yan, H., \& Windhorst, R. 2004, ApJL 612, L93
573: \end{thebibliography}
574:
575: \input{tab2.tex}
576:
577:
578: \end{document}
579: