1: %%
2: %% This is the file `XrU2005.tex'
3: %%
4: %%
5: %% ====================================================
6: %% It describes use of the LaTeX class file XrU2005.cls
7: %% ====================================================
8: %% -------------------------------------------------
9:
10: \documentclass{XrU2005}
11:
12: \title{The XMM-Newton Slew Survey: towards the XMMSL1 catalogue}
13: \author[1]{M.P. Esquej}
14: \author[1]{B. Altieri}
15: \author[1]{D. Bermejo}
16: \author[2]{M.J. Freyberg}
17: \author[1]{V. Lazaro}
18: \author[3]{A.M. Read}
19: \author[1]{R.D. Saxton}
20: \affil[1]{European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Astronomy Centre, Villafranca, Apartado 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain}
21:
22: %\affil[1]{ESAC, European Space Agency (ESA), Villafranca, Apartado 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain}
23: \affil[2]{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse 1, 85784 Garching, Germany}
24: \affil[3]{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Leicester University, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.}
25:
26:
27: \newcommand{\btx}{\textsc{Bib}\TeX}
28: \newcommand{\filename}{XrU2005}
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \keywords{X-rays, XMM-Newton, slew, survey}
33:
34: \maketitle
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: The XMM-Newton satellite is the most sensitive X-ray observatory flown to date
38: due to the great collecting area of its mirrors coupled with the high quantum
39: efficiency of the EPIC detectors. It performs slewing manoeuvers between observation
40: targets tracking almost circular orbits through the ecliptic poles due to the Sun constraint.
41: Slews are made with the EPIC cameras open and the other instruments closed,
42: operating with the observing mode set to the one of the previous pointed observation and the medium
43: filter in place.
44:
45: Slew observations from the EPIC-pn camera in FF, eFF and LW modes provide data, resulting
46: in a maximum of 15 seconds of on-source time. These data can be used to give a uniform survey of the X-ray sky,
47: at great sensitivity in the hard band compared with other X-ray all-sky surveys.
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52: XMM-Newton traces slewing paths over the sky while manoeuvering with both EPIC-pn
53: and EPIC-MOS cameras open.
54: Data from slew observations are recorded into Slew Data Files (SDF), which have been stored
55: in the XMM-Newton Science Archive (XSA) from revolution 314.
56: Not all these data are scientifically useful and
57: data from the EPIC-MOS cameras are now used for calibration purposes.
58:
59: This paper describes the EPIC-pn slew data processing strategy, used to give a uniform coverage over the sky,
60: in order to create the first catalogue of slew detections with XMM-Newton \citep{Freyberg}.
61: It also reports on the current status and
62: scientific utility of the survey.
63:
64:
65:
66: \section{Observations and data analysis}
67:
68: The optimum source searching strategy derived for
69: slew data processing \citep{Read,Saxton} is described below. The
70: attitude reconstruction
71: and spurious detections are dealt with in the corresponding subsections.
72:
73: Data from the EPIC-pn camera are only used due to the faster
74: readout in its observing modes and its high effective area with respect to the EPIC-MOS cameras.
75: In particular, only FF, eFF and LW modes are used because the other EPIC-pn modes
76: are not appropiate for source determination.
77: The characteristic low background of the observations (average ~0.1 cts/arcmin$^{2}$)
78: and the tight PSF of the telescopes provide good sensitivity to detect extended sources \citep{Lazaro} .
79: Nevertheless, slews performed at times of enhanced solar activity have been rejected
80: in the current processing although they
81: are hoped to be included in the future.
82: Slew observations are divided into $\sim$~1 square degree event files before processing in order to
83: get accurate positions over the sky.
84: A near standard pipeline eboxdetect/emldetect tuned for $\sim$~zero background was performed on images
85: containing only single events (pattern 0) in the 0.2-0.5 keV energy range and single plus double events
86: (patterns 0$-$4) in the 0.5-12 keV band.
87: Three
88: different energy bands are source searched independently: total band (0.2$-$0.5 keV), soft band (0.2$-$2 keV) and
89: hard band (2$-$12 keV).
90:
91:
92: \subsection{Attitude reconstruction}
93: The attitude reconstruction is crucial in the determination of source coordinates.
94: After further investigation we concluded that during slews an
95: attitude reconstruction slightly different than for pointed observations
96: had to be performed.
97: The optimal attitude file for reconstructing the astrometry in slew observations is
98: the Raw Attitude File (RAF) with 0.75 seconds subtracted from every entry, a timing error
99: that is due to a delay of the star tracker CCDs.
100:
101: \begin{figure}[ht]
102: \centering
103: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\rotatebox[]{270}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{aitoffpiblack.ps}}}
104: %\rotatebox[]{270}{\includegraphics[height=8cm,clip=true]{aitoffpi.ps}}
105: %\includegraphics[height=5cm,clip=true, angle=90]{aitoffpi.ps}
106: \caption{Aitoff projection of the distribution of all XMMSL1 detections in the total band.
107: }
108: \label{aitoff}
109: \end{figure}
110:
111: \subsection{Spurious detections}
112: Systematic effects in the instrument and detection software lead to a number of spurious detections
113: that are outlined below.
114: In the current slew pipeline unreal sources due to optical loading and detector flashes
115: are directly rejected during processing by using only single-pixel events (pattern 0) below 0.5 keV.
116:
117: False detection: detections not verified through visual
118: inspection. Within bright and/or extended source: multiple detections of the same object.
119: Position suspect: sources located at the edge of an image and others. Background related:
120: sources positioned in localised flared images.
121:
122:
123:
124: \section{The XMM-Newton Slew catalogue}
125: Images and exposure maps have been source searched for 219 slew observations producing
126: 4179 detections in the total band (Fig.~\ref{aitoff}), 2750 in the soft band
127: and 844 in the hard band. The number of real sources is under investigation as spurious detections
128: are currently being flagged.
129: The sky coverage is $\sim$~6300 square degrees which means $\sim$~15\% of
130: the whole sky, indicating a source density of about 0.65 sources per square degree.
131:
132: In order to check the quality of our detections
133: we correlated the 2178 non-extended sources with det\_ml$>$10 (sigma $~$3.9) with different catalogues.
134: It was found that $\sim$~56\% of the sources have a RASS counterpart
135: within 60 arcsec, with 68\% of matches lying within 15 arcsec. Furthermore, correlations with the
136: astronomical database SIMBAD show that 68\% of the matches lie within 8 arcsec.
137: These correlations also indicate a great variety of detected objects
138: during slews, including AGN, galaxies, cluster of galaxies, LMXB and SNR among others.
139:
140:
141: The sensitivity of the survey in the different bands was obtained and flux limits at det\_ml of 10(8)
142: were compared with those of other X-ray all-sky surveys (Fig. ~\ref{flux}). The soft X-ray band detection limit is
143: $6(4.5)\times10^{-13}$ $erg$ $s^{-1}$ $cm^{-2}$, comparable to the one of the ROSAT bright source catalogue \citep{Voges}.
144: The sensitivity of slew detections is particularly evident for the hard X-ray band whose limit
145: is the deepest ever $4(3)\times10^{-12}$ $erg$ $s^{-1}$ $cm^{-2}$ (ten times deeper than EXOSAT, HEAO-1).
146:
147: All detected sources will comprise the first XMM-Newton catalogue
148: derived from slew observations, the XMM-Newton Slew 1 (XMMSL1). It is expected to be published by the end of
149: 2005 and updated when more slews are available to finally have an all-sky survey.
150:
151: \begin{figure}
152: \centering
153: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\rotatebox[]{270}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fluxlim.ps}}}
154: \caption{Flux limits of the X-ray large area surveys. Fluxes for the XMM-slew survey
155: have been calculated for a source with det\_ml=10 and passing through the centre of the
156: field of view. These fluxes were derived from count rates based on energy conversion factors
157: assuming an absorbed power-law model with $N_H$ = $3.0 \times10^{20}$ $cm^{2}$ and slope 1.7}
158: \label{flux}
159: \end{figure}
160:
161:
162:
163:
164:
165: \begin{thebibliography}{}
166:
167: %\bibitem[Jansen et~al.(2001)]{Jansen} Jansen, F. et~al., 2001. \aap, 365, L1-6
168:
169: \bibitem[Freyberg et al., 2005]{Freyberg} Freyberg, M.J., Altieri, B., Bermejo, D., Esquej, M.P.,
170: Lazaro, V., Read, A.M., Saxton, R.D., 2005, ESA-SP 604 (these proceedings)
171:
172: \bibitem[Lazaro et~al., 2005]{Lazaro} Lazaro, V., Saxton, R.D., Read A.M., Esquej M.P., Altieri B., Freyberg M.J.,
173: Bermejo D., 2005, ESA-SP 604 (these proceedings)
174:
175: \bibitem[Read et~al., 2005]{Read} Read, A.M. et al., 2005, MPE Report 288, 137 (astro-ph/0506380)
176:
177: \bibitem[Saxton et~al., 2005]{Saxton} Saxton, R.D., Altieri B., Read A.M., Freyberg M.J., Esquej M.P.,
178: Bermejo D., 2005, \procspie, 5898, in press (astro-ph/0509022)
179:
180: \bibitem[Voges et~al., 1999]{Voges} Voges, W. et~al., 1999, \aap, 349, 389
181: %\bibitem[Saxton et~al.(2005)]{Saxton} Saxton R., Altieri B., Read A., Freyberg M., Esquej P.,
182: %Bermejo D., 2005, \procspie, 5898
183:
184: %\bibitem[Saxton R.D. et~al.(2005)]{Saxton} Saxton R.D., Altieri B., Bermejo D., Esquej M.P., Freyberg M.J., Read A.M.,
185: % 2005, \procspie, 5898
186:
187:
188:
189:
190: %\bibitem[Nobody et~al.(1997)]{NSW:etal:1997} Nobody B., Somebody G., Who M.E., et~al. 1997, \apj, 331, 902
191:
192: %\bibitem[Smith \& Jones(1996)]{SJ:1996} Smith A. \& Jones B. 1996, \aap, 555, 999
193:
194: \end{thebibliography}
195:
196: \end{document}
197: %%
198: %% End of file `XrU2005.tex'.
199: