1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \received{}
4: \accepted{}
5: \revised{}
6: \title{A Double-Mode RR Lyrae Star with a Strong Fundamental Mode
7: Component}
8: \author{Lindsay Oaster and Horace A. Smith}
9: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University,
10: East Lansing, MI 48824}
11: \author{Karen Kinemuchi}
12: \affil{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071}
13:
14:
15:
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18:
19: NSVS 5222076, a thirteenth magnitude star in the Northern Sky Variability
20: Survey, was identified by Oaster as
21: a possible new double-mode RR Lyrae star. We confirm the double-mode
22: nature of NSVS 5222076, supplementing the survey data
23: with new $V$ band photometry.
24: NSVS 5222076 has a fundamental
25: mode period ($P_0$) of 0.4940 day and a first overtone period ($P_1$) of about
26: 0.3668 day, giving a period ratio of $P_1/P_0 = 0.743$. In most
27: double-mode RR Lyrae stars, the amplitude of the first overtone mode
28: pulsation is greater than that of the fundamental mode pulsation. That is
29: not true for this star. Its fundamental mode light curve has an amplitude
30: twice as large as that of the first overtone mode, a ratio very
31: rarely seen even among the double-mode RR Lyrae that do have
32: relatively strong fundamental mode pulsation. Data from the
33: literature are used to discuss the location in the Petersen diagram
34: of double-mode RR Lyrae
35: stars having strong fundamental mode pulsation. Such stars tend to occur
36: toward the
37: short period end of the Petersen diagram, and NSVS 5222076 is no exception
38: to this rule.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{(stars: variables:) RR Lyrae variable }
43:
44: \newpage
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47:
48: The Northern Sky Variability Survey \citep{W04} holds photometry on
49: about
50: 14 million objects brighter than apparent magnitude $V$ = 15.5, which were
51: accessible to the ROTSE-I telescope from its location in New Mexico.
52: \citet{O05} surveyed a selection of the brighter RR Lyrae stars within
53: the Northern Sky Variability Survey (NSVS), identifying variables that
54: might show either the Blazhko
55: Effect or double-mode behavior. She identified NSVS 5222076
56: ($\alpha_{2000} = 15^{h}46^{m}26^{s}$; $\delta_{2000} = +44^{o}18'45''$) as a
57: possible new double-mode RR Lyrae. Double-mode RR Lyrae stars, also
58: known as RRd or RR01 stars, exhibit simultaneous pulsation in the
59: fundamental and first overtone radial modes \citep{S95}.
60: In this paper, we use the NSVS
61: data and additional $V$ band observations to confirm the double-mode
62: behavior of NSVS 5222076, and to show that it exhibits unusually strong
63: fundamental mode pulsation for such a star. We also discuss the
64: location in the Petersen diagram of double-mode stars that, like
65: NSVS 5222076, have
66: a fundamental mode amplitude as large or larger than the amplitude
67: of their first overtone mode pulsation.
68:
69: \section{Photometry and Analysis}
70:
71: \subsection{NSVS Data}
72: We analyzed two sets of photometry of NSVS 5222076. First is the NSVS data for
73: 5222076, obtained from the website at http://skydot.lanl.gov/nsvs/nsvs.php.
74: The NSVS data include 218
75: observations taken between MJD 51274 and MJD 51559 with the ROTSE-I
76: telescope, with a typical photometric
77: uncertainty of $\pm$ 0.03 mag. The NSVS observations are tied to the Tycho
78: $V$ system \citep{W04}, but, because the ROTSE-I observations are unfiltered,
79: RR Lyrae light curves based on NSVS data do not exactly
80: correspond to those that would be observed through standard Johnson
81: $V$ filters \citep{K05}. A period search on the NSVS data
82: using the Period04 program \citep{L05} found a primary period of 0.4940 day,
83: with an uncertainty of about $\pm$ 0.0001 day.
84: The light curve in the upper panel of Figure 1 shows the NSVS
85: observations, folded with the
86: 0.4940 day period after the NSVS MJDs have been converted to heliocentric
87: Julian dates. The curve shows a scatter larger than expected from the
88: photometric errors in the NSVS, a good indication that a single period does not
89: fully describe the NSVS observations.
90:
91: The 0.4940 day period and its first six harmonics were removed from the
92: NSVS data, and the Period04 program was used to search for periodicities
93: in the residuals. A period of 0.3669 days was identified, with an
94: uncertainty of about $\pm$ 0.0002 days.
95: A simultaneous fit was then made for the 0.4940 day period, the
96: 0.3669 day period, and their six larger harmonics. The resultant fundamental
97: mode and first overtone light curves are shown
98: in Figure 2. The amplitude ratio for the fundamental and first overtone
99: modes, $A_0/A_1$, is approximately 2. No significant evidence for
100: additional periods was found.
101:
102: \subsection{V-Band Data}
103: Because of the relatively small number of NSVS observations, we
104: obtained new $V$ band photometry of NSVS 5222076 using the 60-cm telescope of
105: the Michigan State University campus observatory. Between JD 2453414
106: and JD 2453522, we obtained 1570 photometric observations on 16 nights
107: using an Apogee Ap47p CCD camera.
108: Aperture photometry was
109: obtained differentially compared to star 1343-0291412, where the star
110: identification is that of the United States Naval Observatory NOMAD
111: catalog (http://www.nofs.navy.mil/nomad/), which merges data
112: from several prior astrometric and photometric catalogs \citep{Z04}.
113: The NOMAD compilation gives approximate $V$ and $B$ magnitudes of
114: 13.2 and 13.6 for 1343-0291412, making it comparable in magnitude, though
115: perhaps slightly redder than NSVS 5222076.
116: NOMAD star 1344-0283988 was used as a check star.
117: For it, the NOMAD compilation lists magnitudes
118: of $V$ = 13.63 and $B$ = 14.20. The Guide Star Catalog 2 (GSC2.2)
119: numbers for the comparison
120: and check stars are N1321133346 and N132113394, respectively.
121: In Table 1 we give heliocentric Julian
122: Dates and differential magnitudes in the sense
123: $\Delta V$ = $V(5222076) - V(comp star)$
124: for the Michigan State University observations.
125: The accuracy of each of
126: the observations depends somewhat on the sky conditions at
127: the time of observation, but is typically $\pm$ 0.015 mag.
128:
129: We analyzed the $V$ data in a fashion similar to that employed
130: for the NSVS observations.
131: We conducted a period search on the MSU photometry, again finding a
132: primary period of 0.4940 $\pm$ 0.0001 day (frequency $f_0$= 2.0242). When the MSU observations
133: are folded with this period, it is again clear that a single
134: period does not by itself fully describe the light curve behavior (Figure 1,
135: lower panel).
136: We used Period04 to prewhiten the data to remove $f_0$
137: and its next six harmonics. A search on the prewhitened data identified
138: a period of 0.3668 $\pm$ 0.0002 day (frequency $f_1$= 2.7265). These periods were identified
139: as the fundamental and first overtone radial modes, respectively, and
140: are very close to the values obtained from the NSVS data.
141:
142: To see whether there were any additional periods present in the data,
143: we used Period04 to simultaneously fit the $f_0$ and $f_1$
144: frequencies and their next six harmonics. In a further period search
145: on this prewhitened data, we identified small contributions from
146: combinations of $f_0$ and $f_1$.
147:
148: The final fit is shown in Table 2, where only components having an
149: amplitude greater than 0.005 mag are listed.
150: The deconvolved light curves for the 0.3668 day period and the 0.4940
151: day period are shown in Figure 3.
152:
153: The resultant amplitude ratio, $A_0/A_1$, is again 2.0. However, the
154: $V$ band data allow the light curve shape of each mode to be much more
155: clearly seen. It is usually the
156: first overtone radial mode rather than the fundamental mode that
157: is strongest among double-mode RR Lyrae stars. In such cases, the light
158: curve shape of the fundamental
159: mode is more symmetric than is usually seen for stars that pulsate
160: solely in the fundamental mode (RRab stars). Here, however, we see
161: the asymmetric light curve typical of RRab pulsators, with a rise to
162: maximum much steeper than the decline to minimum. We also note in
163: Figure 3, the appearance of a bump before maximum light in
164: the light curve of the fundamental mode. Bumps before the rise to maximum
165: are seen in many
166: RRab light curves, though often not with the prominence shown in Figure 3.
167: We also note that there seems to be some scatter in the deconvolved
168: light curves beyond that expected of observational error alone. In the
169: case of the fundamental mode light curve this is particularly
170: apparent just before
171: the beginning of the pre-rise bump.
172:
173: The pre-rise bump in the light curves of RRab stars is usually believed
174: to be a consequence of shock wave phenomena, though there has been
175: debate over the relative roles of heating by infalling gas
176: and of reflection of a compression wave at the boundary of the
177: core \citep{G88,C92,F97}. The
178: bump is often more prominent in the light curves of RRab stars with
179: large amplitudes. In the case of RR Lyrae, which has a light curve
180: modulated in a 40-day Blazhko cycle, the bump is stronger when the
181: amplitude of the light curve is larger \citep{W49,Ko05}. It is tempting to
182: attribute the pre-maximum bump in the fundamental mode light curve of
183: NSVS 5222076 to the same cause. The interplay between the two pulsation
184: modes might be expected to change the amount of the shock, perhaps resulting
185: in the light curve scatter seen prior to the bump. A problem with this
186: hypothesis is that the fundamental mode amplitude in NSVS 5222076 is
187: smaller than that usually seen in RRab stars that have strong pre-rise
188: bumps.
189:
190: \section{The Petersen Diagram}
191: Double-mode RR Lyrae stars generally fall along a sequence in the Petersen
192: diagram \citep{P73}, in which the ratio of the periods is plotted against the
193: fundamental mode period (see, for example, Figure 6b of \citet{Sz04}).
194: In Figure 4 we have drawn two versions of the Petersen diagram. In the
195: lower panel we have plotted double-mode RR Lyrae stars with published
196: ratios of the fundamental to first overtone amplitude,
197: $A0/A1$, that are smaller than
198: 1.0. Not all identifications of double-mode RR Lyrae in the literature
199: provide amplitude ratio information, but in Figure 4 we have been able to
200: include
201: data on double-mode stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud \citep{So03}, the
202: Sculptor dwarf spheroidal \citep{K01}, the Draco dwarf spheroidal \citep{Smi05},
203: M15 \citep{P95,N85}, the galactic field \citep{W05,G01,C00,C91, M03, J82}, and
204: the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal \citep{Cs01}.
205:
206: In the upper panel of
207: Figure 4 we have plotted double-mode RR Lyrae that have strong fundamental
208: mode pulsation, with an amplitude $A0/A1$ greater than or equal to 1.0.
209: We see that, while the variables with weaker fundamental mode pulsation
210: span the entire range of periods, the stars with
211: stronger fundamental mode pulsation occur only at fundamental periods shorter
212: than 0.51~day, although even in that portion of the Petersen diagram
213: the strong fundamental mode pulsators are in the minority. Although
214: the shorter period end of the Petersen diagram is more densely
215: populated by all double-mode RR Lyrae stars in Figure 4, the
216: concentration of the strong fundamental mode pulsators to that
217: region appears to
218: be too strong to be a statistical fluke. Table 3 shows the number
219: and percentage
220: of double-mode RR Lyrae within this diagram that have $A0/A1$ greater
221: than or equal to 1.0, dividing the sample into three subgroups
222: based on fundamental mode period. Stars with
223: $A0/A1$ greater than or equal to 1.0 account for 12 $\pm$ 2 percent of the
224: complete sample, but the percentage rises at shorter periods and falls
225: at longer periods. A chi squared test for equality of distribution
226: indicates a less than 1 percent probability of obtaining the observed
227: excess of strong fundamental mode pulsators at periods shorter
228: than 0.47 day or the deficiency of such stars at periods longer than 0.51
229: day.
230:
231: Of the 344 double-mode RR Lyrae stars used to construct figure 4, only seven
232: have reported ratios $A0/A1$ greater than 1.5. Only three have a ratio
233: greater than 1.8, making them comparable to NSVS 5222076. These three
234: stars are all among the sample of double-mode RR Lyrae in the Large Magellanic
235: Cloud. Not plotted in Figure 4 because of the large overlap with the
236: \citet{So03} dataset, the LMC double-mode stars identified by \citet{A97}
237: also indicate that double-mode stars with a ratio $A0/A1$ approaching
238: 2 are very rare.
239:
240: One caveat ought to be noted. A large fraction of the RR Lyrae stars
241: in this sample, particularly at periods shorter than 0.51 day, are
242: located in the Large Magellanic Cloud. It is possible that the properties of
243: the double-mode RR Lyrae stars are closely tied to the
244: particular horizontal branch properties of their parent system.
245: If that is the case, the correlations reported here may not be universal.
246:
247: One might also wonder whether any of the field RR Lyrae stars of the Galaxy
248: in Figure 4 might actually be double-mode Cepheids rather than double-mode
249: RR Lyrae stars. As shown, for example, in Figure 1 of \citet{So0},
250: double-mode Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds can have period ratios similar to the
251: 0.74 seen among the RR Lyrae stars. However, in such cases, the
252: fundamental mode periods are longer than 0.7 days, so that if there were
253: Galactic Cepheids similar to those in the Magellanic Clouds, they
254: would be expected to fall off the long period end of Figure 4.
255:
256:
257: NSVS 5222076 is plotted as a cross in figure 4. It falls slightly to the
258: small period ratio side of the general Petersen diagram trend, but
259: is not greatly discrepant. We note the presence of three more
260: discrepant stars in figure 4, all with reportedly strong fundamental
261: mode components. The dark point in the upper panel at a ratio
262: of 0.7493 represents one of the stars in the LMC sample. We have
263: also plotted in figure 4 the locations of two double-mode RR Lyrae
264: in M3, V13 and V200, which have unusually small reported period ratios
265: \citep{Cl04}.
266: One complication in the cases of these two stars is that
267: \citet{Cl04} find evidence that the amplitude ratios of the two
268: stars may change with time (though note the caution in \citet{B05}).
269: The issue of the extent to which the relative amplitudes of the two
270: components in double-mode RR Lyrae stars can change over time remains
271: to be established.
272:
273:
274:
275:
276:
277:
278:
279:
280: \begin{acknowledgements}
281:
282:
283: We thank the National Science Foundation for partial support of this work
284: under grants AST-0205813, AST-0440061, and AST-0307778. We thank the
285: referee for several very useful comments.
286:
287: \end{acknowledgements}
288:
289: \clearpage
290:
291:
292: \begin{thebibliography}{}
293:
294: \bibitem[Alcock et al.(1997)]{A97}Alcock, C. et al. 1997, \apj, 482, 89
295:
296: \bibitem[Alcock et al.(2003)]{A03}Alcock, C. et al., 2003, \apj, 598, 597
297:
298: \bibitem[Benko et al.(2005)]{B05}Benko, J., et al., 2005, preprint.
299:
300: \bibitem[Carney et al.(1992)]{C92}Carney, B.W., Storm, J., Trammell, S.R.,
301: \& Jones, R.V., 1992, \pasp, 104, 44
302:
303:
304: \bibitem[Clement et al.(1991)]{C91}Clement, C.M., Kinman, T.D., \&
305: Suntzeff, N.B., 1991, \apj, 372, 273
306:
307: \bibitem[Clementini et al.(2000)]{C00}Clementini et al., 2000, \aj, 120, 2054
308:
309: \bibitem[Clementini et al.(2004)]{Cl04}Clementini, G., Corwin, T.M., Carney,
310: B.W., \& Sumerel, A.N., 2004, \aj, 127, 938
311:
312: \bibitem[Cseresnjes(2001)]{Cs01}Cseresnjes, P., 2001, \aap, 375, 909
313:
314: \bibitem[Fokin \& Gillet(1997)]{F97}Fokin, A.B. \& Gillet, D., 1997,
315: \aap, 325, 1013
316:
317: \bibitem[Garcia-Melendo et al.(2001)]{G01}Garcia-Melendo, E., Henden, A.A.,
318: Gomez-Forrellad, J.M., 2001, IBVS, 5167, 1
319:
320: \bibitem[Gillet \& Crowe(1988)]{G88}Gillet, D. \& Crowe, R.A., 1988,
321: \aap, 199, 242
322:
323: \bibitem[Jerzykiewicz et al.(1982)]{J82}Jerzykiewicz, M., Schult, R.H.,
324: \& Wenzel, W., 1982, AcA, 32, 357
325:
326: \bibitem[Kinemuchi et al.(2005)]{K05}Kinemuchi, K., Smith, H.A., Wozniak,
327: P.R., McKay, T.A., \& the ROTSE Collaboration, 2005, in prep.
328:
329: \bibitem[Kolenberg et al.(2005)]{Ko05}Kolenberg, K. et al., 2005,
330: in preparation
331:
332: \bibitem[Kov\'{a}cs(2001)]{K01}Kov\'{a}s, G., 2001, \aap, 375, 469
333:
334: \bibitem[Lenz \& Breger(2005)]{L05}Lenz, P. \& Breger, M. (2005),
335: Communications in Astroseismology, 146, 53
336:
337: \bibitem[Moskalik \& Poretti(2003)]{M03}Moskalik, P. \& Poretti, E., 2003,
338: \aap, 398, 213
339:
340: \bibitem[Nemec (1985)]{N85}Nemec, J.M., 1985, \aj, 90, 240
341:
342: \bibitem[Oaster(2005)]{O05}Oaster, L., 2005, Senior Thesis (Michigan
343: State University)
344:
345: \bibitem[Petersen(1973)]{P73}Petersen, J.O., 1973, \aap, 27, 89
346:
347: \bibitem[Purdue et al.(1995)]{P95}Purdue, P., Silbermann, N.A., Gay, P.,
348: \& Smith, H.A., 1995, \aj, 110, 1712
349:
350: \bibitem[Smith (1995)]{S95}Smith, H. A., 1995, RR Lyrae Stars
351: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
352:
353: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2005)]{Smi05}Smith, H.A., Snyder, L., Kinemuchi, K.,
354: \& Harris, H., 2005, in preparation
355:
356: \bibitem[Soszynski et al.(2000)]{So0}Soszynski, I, Udalski, A.,
357: Szymanski, M., Kubiak, M., Pietrzynski, G., Wozniak, P., \& Zebrun, K.,
358: 2000, AcA, 50, 451
359:
360: \bibitem[Soszynski et al.(2003)]{So03}Soszynski, I., et al., 2003, AcA, 53, 93
361:
362: \bibitem[Szab\'{o} et al.(2004)]{Sz04}Szab\'{o}, R., Koll\'{a}th, Z.,
363: \& Buchler, J.R., 2004, \aap, 425, 627
364:
365: \bibitem[Walraven(1949)]{W49}Walraven, Th., 1949, B.A.N., 11, 17
366:
367: \bibitem[Wils \& Otero(2005)]{W05}Wils, P. \& Otero, S.A., 2005, IBVS,
368: 5593, 1
369:
370: \bibitem[Wozniak et al.(2004)]{W04}Wozniak, P.R., et al., 2004, \aj, 137, 2436
371:
372: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{Z04}Zacharias, N., et al., 2004, AAS
373: Meeting 205, \#48.15
374:
375:
376:
377:
378:
379: \end{thebibliography}
380:
381:
382:
383: \clearpage
384: \begin{figure}
385: \plotone{fig1.eps}
386: \figcaption[fig1.eps]{The upper panel shows the light curve of
387: NSVS 5222076 based on observations in the Northern
388: Sky Variability Survey, phased with a period of 0.4940~d. The lower
389: panel shows the MSU $V$ band data, phased with the same period.
390: \label{fig1}}
391: \end{figure}
392:
393: \begin{figure}
394: \plotone{fig2.eps}
395: \figcaption[fig2.eps]{Fundamental mode and first overtone mode light
396: curves of NSVS 5222076, based upon NSVS data, and phased with the indicated
397: periods.
398: \label{fig2}}
399: \end{figure}
400:
401: \begin{figure}
402: \plotone{fig3.eps}
403: \figcaption[fig3.eps]{Fundamental mode and first overtone mode light
404: curves of NSVS 5222076, based on Michigan State University data.
405: \label{fig3}}
406: \end{figure}
407:
408: \begin{figure}
409: \plotone{fig4.eps}
410: \figcaption[fig4.eps]{Petersen diagrams for a sample of double mode
411: RR Lyrae from the literature for which amplitude information
412: is available. The upper panel depicts double-mode stars for which the
413: fundamental mode amplitude, $A0$, is stronger than the first overtone
414: mode amplitude, $A1$. Variables with weaker fundamental mode amplitudes
415: are plotted in the lower panel. In the upper panel, X marks the location
416: of NSVS 5222076 and the two open squares indicate the places of two
417: unusual double-mode RR Lyrae in the globular cluster M3.
418: \label{fig4}}
419: \end{figure}
420:
421:
422:
423:
424:
425: \clearpage
426: \begin{deluxetable}{cc}
427: \tablewidth{0pc}
428: \footnotesize
429: \tablenum{1}
430: \tablecaption{CCD Photometry (Michigan State University)}
431: \tablehead{
432: \colhead{HJD} & \colhead{$\Delta$V}
433: }
434: \startdata
435: 2453414.8263 & -0.233\\
436: 2453414.8275 & -0.251 \\
437: 2453414.8287 & -0.255\\
438: 2453414.8299 & -0.243\\
439: \enddata
440: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic
441: edition of the Publications. The printed edition contains only a sample.}
442: \end{deluxetable}
443:
444: \clearpage
445:
446:
447: \clearpage
448: \begin{deluxetable}{cl}
449: \tablewidth{0pc}
450: \footnotesize
451: \tablenum{2}
452: \tablecaption{Fit to $V$ Band Data}
453: \tablehead{
454: \colhead{Frequency (c/d)} & \colhead{Ampl. (mag)}
455: }
456: \startdata
457: 2.0242 ($=f_0$) & 0.203\\
458: $2f_0$ & 0.088\\
459: $3f_0$ & 0.045\\
460: $4f_0$ & 0.019\\
461: $5f_0$ & 0.014\\
462: $6f_0$ & 0.008\\
463: $7f_0$ & 0.005\\
464: 2.7265 (=$f_1$) & 0.105\\
465: $2f_1$ & 0.010\\
466: $3f_1$ & 0.006\\
467: $f_0 + f_1$ & 0.021\\
468: $2f_0 + f_1$ & 0.036\\
469: $3f_0 + f_1$ & 0.018\\
470: $f_0 - f_1$ & 0.024\\
471:
472: \enddata
473: \end{deluxetable}
474:
475: \begin{deluxetable}{crr}
476: \tablewidth{0pc}
477: \footnotesize
478: \tablenum{3}
479: \tablecaption{RRd Stars with $A0/A1$ $\geq$ 1.0}
480: \tablehead{
481: \colhead{Fundamental Period (days)} & \colhead{Number} & \colhead{Percentage}
482: }
483: \startdata
484: $< 0.47$ & 21 & 24 \\
485: 0.47 -- 0.51 & 20 & 11 \\
486: $> 0.51$ & 0 & 0\\
487: All periods & 41 & 12 \\
488: \enddata
489: \end{deluxetable}
490:
491:
492: \clearpage
493:
494: \end{document}
495:
496:
497: