1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{IRAS 16293-2422: Evidence for Infall onto a Counter-Rotating Protostellar Accretion Disk}
5:
6: \author{Anthony J. Remijan\altaffilmark{1,2} and J. M. Hollis\altaffilmark{1}}
7:
8: \altaffiltext{1}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Computational and Information Sciences and Technology Office, Code 606, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
9: \altaffiltext{2}{National Research Council Resident Research Associate}
10:
11: \begin{abstract}
12:
13: We report high spatial resolution VLA observations of the low-mass
14: star-forming region IRAS 16293-2422 using four molecular probes:
15: ethyl cyanide (CH$_3$CH$_2$CN), methyl formate (CH$_3$OCHO), formic acid (HCOOH),
16: and the ground vibrational state of silicon monoxide (SiO). Ethyl cyanide emission has a
17: spatial scale of $\sim$20$''$ and encompasses binary cores A and B as
18: determined by continuum emission peaks. Surrounded by formic acid
19: emission, methyl formate emission has a spatial scale of $\sim$6$''$and is
20: confined to core B. SiO emission shows two velocity
21: components with spatial scales less than 2$''$ that map $\sim$2$''$ northeast of
22: the A and B symmetry axis. The redshifted SiO is $\sim$2$''$ northwest of
23: blueshifted SiO along a position angle of $\sim$135$^o$ which is
24: approximately parallel to the A and B symmetry axis. We interpret the
25: spatial position offset in red and blueshifted SiO emission as due to
26: rotation of a protostellar accretion disk and we derive $\sim$1.4 M$_{\odot}$
27: interior to the SiO emission. In the same vicinity, Mundy et
28: al.\ (1986) also concluded rotation of a nearly edge-on disk from OVRO
29: observations of much stronger and ubiquitous $^{13}$CO emission but the
30: direction of rotation is opposite to the SiO emission findings.
31: Taken together, SiO and $^{13}$CO data suggest evidence for a
32: counter-rotating disk. Moreover, archival BIMA array $^{12}$CO data show
33: an inverse P Cygni profile with the strongest absorption in close
34: proximity to the SiO emission, indicating unambiguous material infall
35: toward the counter-rotating protostellar disk at a new source location within
36: the IRAS 16293-2422 complex. The details of these
37: observations and our interpretations are discussed.
38:
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords{ISM: abundances - ISM: clouds - ISM: individual (IRAS 16293-2422) - ISM: molecules - radio lines: ISM}
42:
43: \section{INTRODUCTION}
44:
45: IRAS 16293-2422 is a low-mass star forming region located in the $\rho$ Ophiuchus
46: cloud complex at a heliocentric distance of 160 pc. It contains an undetermined number of protostellar
47: objects, high velocity outflows in the E-W and NE-SW directions (Stark et al.\ 2004), and the region
48: is dominated by two radio continuum peaks designated cores A and B. These two principal cores
49: are separated by $\sim$5$''$ and are often referred to as the ``binary'' system with
50: a mass of 0.49 M$_{\odot}$ for core A and 0.61 M$_{\odot}$ for core B (Looney, Mundy \& Welch 2000).
51: Moreover, the gas and dust toward core A appears to be at a higher
52: temperature than core B and most of the molecular emission lines of
53: high energy transitions have been detected exclusively toward core A. The measured
54: dust temperature toward core B is $\sim$40 K (Mundy et al.\ 1986) and the measured
55: temperature toward core A from many different molecular species is between 80 and 200 K
56: (Chandler et al.\ 2005).
57:
58: Spectral observations with the IRAM 30-m radio telescope toward the low-mass
59: protostellar system IRAS 16293-2422 (Cazaux et al.\ 2003) demonstrated an extremely rich organic
60: inventory with abundant amounts of complex oxygen and nitrogen bearing molecules including formic acid
61: (HCOOH), methyl formate (CH$_3$OCHO), acetic acid (CH$_3$COOH) and methyl cyanide (CH$_3$CN)
62: which are archetypal species often found in massive hot molecular cores (HMCs).
63: Subsequent spatial observations by Kuan et al.\ (2004) with the Submillimeter Array (SMA)
64: mapped emission from high energy transitions of CH$_3$OCHO, vibrationally excited
65: vinyl cyanide (CH$_2$CHCN) and other large molecular species. Additionally, Bottinelli et al.\
66: (2004) mapped slightly lower energy transitions of CH$_3$CN and CH$_3$OCHO with the Plateau
67: de Bure interferometer, noting that all the molecular emission is contained toward cores A
68: and B and that no large molecule emission is seen associated with the molecular outflows. Recently,
69: Chandler et al.\ (2005) detected large abundances of a number of different organic molecular
70: species primarily located toward core A from SMA observations. Moreover, from observations of
71: sulfur monoxide (SO) absorbing against the background dust continuum near binary core B, Chandler
72: et al.\ (2005) suggest that there must be material from an extended molecular envelope
73: falling onto an embedded dust disk and that there may be a low-velocity
74: outflow coming from an embedded protostar.
75:
76: The discovery of large oxygen and nitrogen bearing molecules in a low-mass star forming region is significant
77: because the molecular complexity appears to be similar to high-mass star forming regions. Such
78: complex molecules undoubtedly are incorporated into subsequent formation of
79: protoplanetary bodies and would provide a rich organic inventory that could be supplied
80: to early planetary systems similar to that expected to have occurred in our own pre-solar nebula.
81: With this in mind, we conducted high resolution observations of IRAS 16293-2422 using the
82: NRAO\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of
83: the National Science Foundation, operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
84: Universities, Inc.} Very Large Array (VLA) using four molecular probes: ethyl cyanide (CH$_3$CH$_2$CN),
85: methyl formate (CH$_3$OCHO), formic acid (HCOOH) and the ground vibrational state of silicon monoxide (SiO) to determine
86: the implication of their relative spatial locations. Surprisingly, the location of SiO is
87: not co-spatial with either core A or B. This prompted us to process archival BIMA array $^{12}$CO data
88: for an explanation.
89:
90: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
91:
92: Observations of IRAS 16293-2422 were conducted with the VLA in 2005 June 27 and 28
93: in its BnC configuration. Formic acid (HCOOH) and methyl formate (CH$_3$OCHO) were
94: observed simultaneously in one correlator setting and ethyl cyanide (CH$_3$CH$_2$CN)
95: and silicon monoxide (SiO) in another correlator setting. Table 1 lists the molecule (col. [1]),
96: transition quantum numbers (col. [2]), rest frequency (col. [3]), upper energy level
97: E$_u$ (col. [4]), line strength S (col. [5]), dipole moment $\mu_a$ (col. [6]), and molecular
98: parameter reference (col. [7]). The phase center for all
99: observations was $\alpha$= 16$^h$32$^m$22$^s$.8, $\delta$ = -24$^o$28$'$33$''$ (J2000.0).
100: The correlator was operated in the four intermediate-frequency (IF) normal mode, and the
101: selection of a 6.25 MHz bandpass yielded 32 spectral channels in two pairs of oppositely
102: polarized IFs giving a channel width of 195.313 kHz ($\sim$1.35 km s$^{-1}$ at 44 GHz).
103:
104: The compact radio source 1625-254 was used as the primary phase calibrator. The absolute
105: flux density scale was determined from observations of 1331+305 (3c286) whose average
106: flux density from the 2 observing bands was 1.44 Jy as given by the SETJY routine
107: in AIPS. The averaged bootstrapped flux density of 1625-254 was 0.6 Jy. Antenna
108: gains were derived from 1625-254 observations at 5 minute intervals. After $\sim$1 hr,
109: a pointing calibration was performed to ensure pointing accuracy. All data were combined
110: and calibrated using the AIPS data reduction package of NRAO. The calibrated $u-v$ datasets
111: were then imported into MIRIAD (Sault et al.\ 1995) for imaging and deconvolution. Figures
112: 1-4 show the images of the emission from CH$_3$CH$_2$CN, CH$_3$OCHO, HCOOH,
113: and SiO, respectively toward IRAS 16293-2422.
114:
115: The naturally weighted synthesized beamwidth resulting from the BnC configuration at 44 GHz
116: was 0.$''$4$\times$0.$''$3 and the largest angular size that can be measured in the
117: BnC array is 43$''$. In order to determine the location and morphology
118: of the molecular emission toward 16293-2422, the calibrated $u-v$
119: data were INVERTed using synthesized beams ranging from the naturally weighted synthesized
120: beamwidth to a beamwidth of 20$''$$\times$20$''$. This process indicated
121: whether the bulk of the emission from a given species was compact or extended and was
122: utilized since: (1) emission from HCOOH, SiO ($J=1-0$, $v$=0) and CH$_3$CH$_2$CN had not been previously
123: mapped toward this region, and (2) no emission feature of low energy transitions (E$_u$$<$7.5 K)
124: of large molecules had been imaged toward this region.
125:
126: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSION}
127:
128: \subsection{CH$_3$CH$_2$CN}
129:
130: Figure 1 shows a contour map of the 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ transition of CH$_3$CH$_2$CN
131: superimposed on the 0.7 cm continuum emission (grayscale). The mapped
132: CH$_3$CH$_2$CN emission region shows two blended emission peaks. Compared
133: to the small naturally weighted beamwidth, a relatively large
134: synthesized beamwidth of 10.$''$0$\times$7.$''$5 is necessary to detect
135: CH$_3$CH$_2$CN which is extended with respect to cores A and B and the
136: oxygen bearing species (see $\S$ 3.2). Figure 1 also shows a
137: hanning smoothed emission spectrum, which was extracted from the entire
138: region of mapped emission, with an rms noise level of $\sim$7 mJy beam$^{-1}$ shown on the left.
139: The spectrum shows a relatively strong emission component at an LSR velocity of +7.7 km s$^{-1}$ and a possible
140: weaker component at +2.0 km s$^{-1}$. The systemic LSR velocity of +3.9 km
141: s$^{-1}$ (Bottinelli et al.\ 2004) is shown as a dashed line. We determine the total
142: beam-averaged CH$_3$CH$_2$CN column density, $N_{T}$, using the formula:
143:
144: \begin{equation}
145: N_{T} = 2.04\frac{Q(T_{rot})e^{(E_u/T_{rot})} \int \Delta I dv }{\theta_a \theta_b \nu^3 S_{ij}\mu^2 }\times10^{20} \rm{cm^{-2}},
146: \end{equation}
147:
148: \noindent
149: which is described in Remijan et al.\ (2004) where $E_u$ is the upper state energy level (K);
150: $T_{rot}$ is the rotational temperature (K); $\theta_a$ and $\theta_b$ are the major
151: and minor axes of the synthesized beam (arcsec); $\int \Delta I dv$ is the observed integrated line
152: intensity (Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$); $\nu$ is the rest frequency (GHz); $S_{ij}\mu^2$ is the
153: product of the transition line strength and the square
154: of the electric dipole moment (Debye$^2$) and $Q(T_{rot})$ is the
155: rotational partition function. $N_{T}$(EtCN) $\sim$ 5.2$\times$10$^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$,
156: which assumes a rotational temperature of 54 K (Cazaux et al.\ 2003), is listed in Table 2. For a
157: molecular hydrogen column density of 7.5$\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Cazaux et al.\
158: 2003), the CH$_3$CH$_2$CN fractional abundance, $X$(EtCN), is 6.9$\times$10$^{-9}$.
159: These values are consistent to the column density of CH$_3$CH$_2$CN previously measured
160: toward this source and is typical of the fractional abundance seen toward the Orion Compact
161: Ridge (Cazaux et al.\ 2003).
162:
163: The Figure 1 detection of extended emission with a spatial scale of
164: $\sim$20$"$ in a low-energy transition of CH$_3$CH$_2$CN demonstrates that there is
165: a large envelope of cold molecular gas surrounding the compact binary
166: cores A and B. Core A is reputed to be hot (Chandler et al.\ 2005) while core B is
167: thought to be much cooler (Mundy et al.\ 1986). A warm gas phase chemistry or
168: grain surface chemistry can lead to enhanced emission from nitrogen bearing molecules in hot molecular
169: cores (Remijan et al.\ 2004; Mehringer \& Snyder 1996). In previous
170: observations of IRAS 16293-2422 which sample high energy level
171: transitions at 1 and 3 mm, enhanced emission of nitrogen bearing
172: molecules have been detected toward cores A and B (e.g., CH$_3$CN by
173: Bottinelli et al.\ 2004; HCN, HC$_3$N, and CH$_2$CHCN by Kuan et al.\ 2004)
174: on a typical spatial scale of $\sim$5$''$. Thus, our
175: low-energy CH$_3$CH$_2$CN observations are complementary to these
176: high-energy observations of other nitrogen bearing molecules,
177: suggesting both increasing temperature and density gradients toward
178: cores A and B.
179:
180: \subsection{CH$_3$OCHO and HCOOH}
181:
182: High energy transition of a number of different molecules have
183: emission centroids near core A (e.g., see Figure 9 of Chandler et
184: al. 2005); in particular, CH$_3$OCHO has high energy transitions that are
185: associated with core A (Chandler et al.\ 2005; Bottinelli et al.\
186: 2004; Kuan et al.\ 2004). The only large oxygen bearing molecule detected
187: by Chandler et al.\ (2005) toward core B is a low energy transition
188: of dimethyl ether (CH$_3$OCH$_3$). Figures 2 and 3 show maps of low-energy transitions
189: of CH$_3$OCHO and HCOOH, respectively, that are in proximity to core
190: B. This is further evidence that core B is a much cooler
191: protostellar core than core A. In Figure 2, the averaged emission
192: from both the A and E states of CH$_3$OCHO are mapped using a
193: synthesized beamwidth of $\sim$2.$''$6$\times$1.$''$8.
194: %as an independent check on
195: %achieving the expected similar results for the exact same core
196: %excitation conditions; the two maps are essentially the same in
197: %flux level and spatial extent, indicating that the two states are
198: %cospatial as expected.
199: Figure 2 also shows an emission complex centered on the A and E states if one
200: assumes an LSR velocity of $\sim$+3.9 km s$^{-1}$. This complex
201: appears to be suffering from the competing effects of emission and
202: self-absorption. In order to observe both states in the same
203: bandpass, the average frequency (45.3966 GHz) of
204: both states was used in the observations and this average
205: frequency corresponds to an LSR velocity of +3.9 km s$^{-1}$ in
206: Figure 2 while the A and E states appear at -1.6 and +9.4 km s$^{-1}$,
207: respectively. Figure 3 shows a map of the low-energy transition of HCOOH that surrounds the peak of
208: core B and also the CH$_3$OCHO emission in Figure 2; no HCOOH
209: emission was detected in the vicinity of core A. In Figure 3, the emission
210: from HCOOH was mapped using a synthesized beamwidth of $\sim$2.$''$6$\times$1.$''$8; similar
211: to the beamwidth used to map the CH$_4$OCHO emission. The LSR
212: velocity of HCOOH is $\sim$+3.9 km s$^{-1}$ as indicated by the vertical
213: dashed line in the spectrum also shown in Figure 3.
214:
215: The spatial distributions of CH$_3$OCHO and HCOOH toward core B of
216: IRAS 16293-2422 compare favorably to those same spatial
217: distributions observed toward the Orion Molecular Cloud (OMC-1)
218: compact ridge (Hollis et al.\ 2003; Liu et al.\ 2002). For
219: example, in the OMC-1 compact ridge, Hollis et al.\ (2003)
220: observed HCOOH emission surrounding CH$_3$OCHO emission, and
221: suggested that the HCOOH emission delineates the leading edge of a
222: shock front as the outflow from source "I" interacts with the
223: quiescent ambient gas; the CH$_3$OCHO emission, which is closer to
224: source "I", then represents the post shock gas. If this scenario
225: is correct for IRAS 16293-2422, then the corresponding outflow
226: source associated with Figures 2 and 3 is likely core B itself.
227: Indeed, Chandler et al.\ (2005) report evidence for material infall
228: toward and also low-velocity outflow from core B; both conditions
229: undoubtedly result in shock phenomena. Toward core A, enhanced
230: abundances of large molecules provide indirect evidence for
231: shocks to explain the enhancements (Chandler et al.\ 2005). The molecular
232: differences between cores A and B are most likely explained by
233: temperature differences and different protostellar ages. In any
234: case, the presence of shocks seemingly leads to abundance
235: enhancements in oxygen-bearing molecules, including large
236: interstellar aldehydes located in high-mass star forming regions
237: like Sgr B2 (e.g., see Hollis et al.\ 2004a, b).
238:
239: Because the CH$_3$OCHO emission appears to be self-absorbed, we can only give a lower limit to the
240: column density over the entire emission complex. Since we have observed only low energy transitions in this
241: work, a conservative rotational temperature of 40 K (Mundy et al.\ 1986) is assumed
242: which yields $N_T$(MeF) $>$1.9$\times$10$^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$. Assuming an H$_2$
243: column density of 1.6$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ toward core B (Kuan et al.\ 2004), the
244: CH$_3$OCHO fractional abundance is $X$(MeF) $>$1.2$\times$10$^{-8}$. For the same
245: rotational temperature, $N_T$(HCOOH) $\sim$ 4.1$\times$10$^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$ and the HCOOH
246: fractional abundance is $X$(HCOOH) $\sim$ 2.5$\times$10$^{-9}$ (see Table 2).
247:
248: \subsection{SiO}
249:
250: Figure 4 shows redshifted and blueshifted SiO ($J=1-0$, $v$=0) emission contours
251: mapped separately over the 0.7 cm continuum (grayscale). These two components of the SiO emission are
252: seen at LSR velocities of +2.3 km s$^{-1}$ and +7.9 km s$^{-1}$
253: which are approximately symmetrical around the systemic LSR velocity of 3.9 km s$^{-1}$. The peak
254: intensity maps, which are reminiscent of SiO maser spots, are shown at these velocities. The
255: resulting synthesized beamwidth of $\sim$1.$''$5$\times$0.$''$8 is shown at the bottom
256: left of the map. Also shown in Figure 4 is a spectrum which is averaged over the SiO emitting
257: regions and hanning smoothed over 3 channels; the rms noise level is $\sim$3 mJy beam$^{-1}$ shown to the left.
258:
259: This is the first detection of the $J=1-0$, $v$=0 transition of SiO toward IRAS 16293-2422 and the
260: first map of the compact emission from SiO in the vicinity of cores A and B. Previous surveys by
261: Blake et al.\ (1994) and Ceccarelli et al.\ (2000) detected weak emission features of higher
262: energy transitions of $v$=0 SiO using single element radio telescopes. From a chemical model of the IRAS 16293-2422
263: region, Ceccarelli et al.\ (2000) concluded that an enhanced abundance of SiO was necessary
264: to account for the excess emission from the higher $J$ level transitions and
265: that the emission must be coming from a compact ($<$3$''$) region. Finally, their model
266: calculated an infall velocity of SiO of 2.8 km s$^{-1}$ which was consistent with their
267: observed $\sim$5 km s$^{-1}$ linewidths.
268:
269: From our high resolution VLA observations, we find that the blue and redshifted SiO
270: emission peaks have a spatial separation
271: of $\sim$2$''$ and the center of the SiO emission centroid is located at $\alpha$= 16$^h$32$^m$22$^s$.875,
272: $\delta$ = -24$^o$28$'$32$''$.48 (J2000.0). This location is within 0.$''$6
273: of the pointing position and
274: location of the $^{13}$CO emission centroid taken with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) millimeter
275: array (Mundy et al.\ 1986) and the peak position of CS emission taken with the IRAM 30-m (Menten et al.\ 1987).
276: From the red and blueshifted emission peaks, Mundy et al.\ (1986) inferred a rotational velocity of 2 km s$^{-1}$
277: and a 2 M$_{\odot}$ rotating disk of material internal to the $^{13}$CO emission. From the CS data,
278: Menten et al.\ (1987) inferred a rotational velocity of 1.1 km s$^{-1}$ from lower resolution observations
279: a 4 M$_{\odot}$ rotating disk of material. From the high resolution SiO data, we determine a
280: rotational velocity of $\sim$2.8 km s$^{-1}$ and for a IRAS 16293-2422 distance of 160 pc, the mass interior
281: to the SiO emission is $\sim$1.4M$_{\odot}$. However, assuming the SiO emission is associated with rotation,
282: the compact disk containing the SiO emission is {\it counter-rotating} with respect to the
283: previously reported $^{13}$CO and CS emission. From archival BIMA array data taken of the $J=2-1$
284: transition of $^{12}$CO at 230.538 GHz, we find both emission and absorption toward IRAS 16293-2422.
285: Moreover, the spectrum of the $^{12}$CO data clearly show an inverse P Cygni profile with the strongest
286: absorption in close proximity to the SiO emission (Figure 5), indicating unambiguously, material infalling
287: toward the molecular disk. Chandler et al.\ (2005) also suggest there is evidence for infall toward core B
288: from the absorption profile of SO taken with the SMA.
289:
290: It is important to note that we have only observed small-scale, blue-shifted emission and
291: small-scale, red-shifted absorption of $^{12}$CO in the vicinity of cores A and B (see the image
292: in Figure 5); these data possess the characteristic signature of infalling matter (i.e., an
293: inverse P Cygni profile shown in Figure 5). While the $^{12}$CO emission encompasses cores A and
294: B, the more compact absorption occurs at a discrete position $\sim$3.$''$5 north of core A and
295: $\sim$2.$''$5 west of core B (see Figure 4). On the other hand, large-scale $^{12}$CO has been
296: observed in red-shifted emission and blue-shifted emission by other investigators who
297: reasonably interpret these results as outflow whose origin has traditionally been assigned to
298: core A. Thus, $^{12}$CO on two different spatial scales indicate two different phenomena: one
299: of infall on a small-scale toward a newly detected protostellar accretion disk whose
300: position is precisely determined and one of large-scale outflow whose exact origin may be
301: difficult to determine. The location of the accretion disk that we have detected seems to
302: account for our small-scale SiO observations and the somewhat larger-scale $^{13}$CO
303: observations of Mundy et al.\ (1986) and CS observations of Menten et al.\ (1987) only if
304: the nearly edge-on disk is counter-rotating since the direction of rotation is opposite for SiO
305: when compared to either $^{13}$CO or CS. Additional observational support for this scenario
306: can be seen in the BIMA and OVRO array images of Sch\"{o}ier et al.\ (2005) who observed a
307: number of low energy transitions (i.e., the J = 1 - 0 of HCO$^+$, HNC, and N$_2$H$^+$ and the $J =
308: 2 - 1$ of C$^{18}$O and SiO). In these images, for example, the $J = 2 - 1$ transition of SiO
309: suggests rotation in the opposite direction to the $J = 1 - 0$ transition of HCO$^+$. Compared
310: to the VLA data presented in this work, these BIMA and OVRO data have an order of
311: magnitude coarser spatial resolution that precludes an exact determination of the SiO
312: emission locations that are apparent in the VLA map shown in Figure 4. Furthermore, SiO is a refractory
313: molecule that can withstand high temperatures, and would likely exist closer to a forming
314: protostellar source than most other molecules.
315: %The SiO emission shows two velocity
316: %components that are separated by 5.6 km s$^{-1}$ and separated in space by $\sim$300 AU.
317: %A rotating protostellar disk with a mass interior to the SiO emission that is equivalent to 1.4 M$_{\odot}$
318: %would be required to produce these conditions. Previous
319: %investigations with less refractory molecules such as $^{13}$CO and CS yield a larger mass but
320: %the rotation is opposite to that shown in SiO.
321: Thus, the high resolution VLA observations have shown for the first time, evidence for a new
322: protostellar core with a compact inner portion of the disk
323: containing the SiO emission counter-rotating with respect to the outer portion of the disk
324: containing $^{13}$CO and CS. Counter-rotating cores have been reported in disks of galaxies
325: before (e.g., Thomas et al.\ 2005 and references therein), but this is the first indication of
326: such behavior in a protostellar accretion disk.
327:
328: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
329:
330: To summarize, we find a low temperature envelope of molecular CH$_3$CH$_2$CN
331: emission that is encompassing the IRAS 16293-2422 cores A and B. Furthermore,
332: low frequency, low energy transitions of large oxygen bearing molecules (i.e. HCOOH
333: and CH$_3$OCHO) are seen toward core B where an outflow may be responsible for
334: a low velocity shock that is leading to enhanced abundances of large oxygen
335: bearing species. Also, the SiO emission shows two velocity
336: components with spatial scales less than 2$''$ and a velocity separation of $\sim$5.6 km s$^{-1}$.
337: We interpret the spatial position offset in red and blueshifted SiO emission as due to the rotation of a
338: protostellar accretion disk and we derive $\sim$1.4 M$_{\odot}$ interior to the SiO emission.
339:
340: While it could be that the SiO complex we observe is due to outflow,
341: evidence is accumulating to the contrary that rotation is the
342: explanation. Such evidence is best seen on a small scale. The
343: SiO observations in the present work show two velocity
344: components each with linewidths of $\sim$5 km s$^{-1}$, suggesting rotation of a
345: disk seen edge-on since the two components are not cospatial, are
346: symmetric about an infall location, and have a velocity gradient
347: perpendicular to large-scale CO outflow. Moreover, images of other
348: molecules on a small-scale also show that their velocity gradients are
349: orthogonal to the direction of outflow seen on a large scale (e.g.,
350: Sch\"{o}ier et al.\ 2005). In this work, we have been very careful to
351: match the synthesized beam to the source emission or absorption to
352: pin-point the location of a new source of infall $\sim$3.$''$5 north of core
353: source A and $\sim$2.$''$5 west of core source B. We have done this by
354: two independent sets of observations (i.e., the VLA in SiO emission and the BIMA array in $^{12}$CO absorption).
355: While there are no previous reports of continuum emission at this
356: location, an inverse P Cygni profile is absolute proof of absorption
357: against background continuum, and our BIMA data show that the location
358: is smaller than the synthesized beam (i.e., 3.2$''$$\times$0.8$''$). Thus, the
359: continuum source is undoubtedly small (e.g. a disk seen edge-on) and
360: may eventually be detected by an interferometer at high resolution
361: with enough integration time.
362:
363: However, the compact disk containing the SiO emission is {\it counter-rotating} with
364: respect to the $^{13}$CO and CS emission seen by other investigators. This is the
365: first report of evidence for a counter-rotating accretion disk toward a low-mass protostellar complex.
366: Moreover, archival BIMA array $^{12}$CO data show an inverse P Cygni profile with the
367: strongest absorption in close proximity to the SiO emission, indicating unambiguously, material infalling
368: toward the counter-rotating protostellar disk. The infall location is compelling evidence
369: for a new protostellar source within the IRAS 16293-2422 complex.
370:
371: We thank F. Sch\"{o}ier and C. Ceccarelli for valuable comments on this work, and R.
372: Crutcher for permission to utilize the BIMA array data archive to
373: explore $^{12}$CO data toward IRAS 16293-2422. J.M.H.\ gratefully acknowledges
374: research support from H.A.\ Thronson while assigned to the NASA Science Mission Directorate.
375: \clearpage
376:
377: \begin{thebibliography}{}
378:
379: \bibitem[]{}Blake, G. A., van Dishoek, E. F., Jansen, D. J., Groesbeck, T. D., \& Mundy, L. G.
380: 1994, ApJ, 428, 680
381:
382: \bibitem[]{}Bottinelli, S., Ceccarelli, C., Neri, R., Williams, J. P., Caux, E., Cazaux, S., Lefloch, B.,
383: Maret, S., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 617, L69
384:
385: \bibitem[]{}Cazaux, S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ceccarelli, C., Castets, A., Wakelam, V., Caux, E., Parise, B.,
386: \& Teyssier, D. 2003, ApJ, 593, L51
387:
388: \bibitem[]{}Ceccarelli, C., Castets, A., Caux, E., Hollenbach, D., Loinard, L., Molinari, S., \& Tielens,
389: A. G. G. M. 2000, A\&A, 355, 1129
390:
391: \bibitem[]{}Chandler, C. J., Brogan, C. L., Shirley, Y. L., \& Loinard L. 2005, ApJ, in press
392:
393: \bibitem[]{}Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R., Lovas, F. J., Remijan, A., M$\o$llendal, H. 2004a, ApJ, 610, L21
394:
395: \bibitem[]{}Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R., Lovas, F. J., Remijan, A. 2004b, ApJ, 613, L45
396:
397: \bibitem[]{}Hollis, J. M., Pedelty, J. A., Snyder, L. E., Jewell, P. R., Lovas, F. J., Palmer, Patrick,
398: \& Liu, S.-Y. 2003, ApJ, 588, 353
399:
400: \bibitem[]{}Kuan, Y.-J., Huang, H.-C., Charnley, S. B., Hirano, N., Takakuwa, S., Wilner,
401: D. J., Liu, S.-Y., Ohashi, N., Bourke, T. L., Qi, C., \& Zhang, Q., 2004, ApJ,
402: 616, L27
403:
404: \bibitem[]{}Liu, S.-Y., Girart, J. M., Remijan, A., Snyder, L. E. 2002, ApJ, 576, 255
405:
406: \bibitem[]{}Looney, L. W., Mundy, L. G., Welch, W. J. 2000, ApJ, 529, 477
407:
408: \bibitem[]{}Lovas, F. J. \& Krupenie, P. 1974, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 3, 245
409:
410: \bibitem[]{}Lovas, F. J. 1982, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 11, 251
411:
412: \bibitem[]{}Mehringer, D. M., \& Snyder, L. E. 1996, ApJ, 471, 897
413:
414: \bibitem[]{}Menten, K. M., Serabyn, E., Guesten, R., Wilson, T. L. 1987, A\&A, 177, L57
415:
416: \bibitem[]{}Mundy, L. G., Myers, S. T., \& Wilking, B. A. 1986, ApJ, 311, L75
417:
418: \bibitem[]{}Oesterling, L. C., Albert, S., de Lucia, F. C., Sastry, K. V. L. N., \& Herbst, E. 1999, ApJ, 521, 255
419:
420: \bibitem[]{}Remijan, A., Shiao, Y.-S., Friedel, D. N., Meier, D. S., Snyder, L. E. 2004, ApJ, 617, 384
421:
422: \bibitem[]{}Sault, R.~J., Teuben, P.~J., \& Wright, M.~C.~H.\ 1995, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 77: Astronomical Data
423: Analysis Software and Systems IV, 77, 433
424:
425: \bibitem[]{}Sch\"{o}ier, F. L., J$\o$rgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., \& Mundy, L. G. 2005, A\&A, in preparation
426:
427: \bibitem[]{}Stark, R., Sandell, G., Beck, S. C., Hogerheijde, M. R., van Dishoeck, E. F.,
428: van der Wal, P., van der Tak, F. F. S., Sch\"{a}fer, F., Melnick, G. J., Ashby, M. L. N.,
429: \& de Lange, G. 2004, ApJ, 608, 341
430:
431: \bibitem[]{}Thomas, D., Brimioulle, F., Bender, R., Hopp, U., Greggio, L., Maraston, C., \& Saglia, R. P. 2005, A\&A, in press
432:
433: \bibitem[]{}Willemot, E., Dangoisse, D., Monnanteuil, N., \& Bellet, J. 1980, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 9, 59
434:
435: \end{thebibliography}
436:
437: \begin{center}
438: {\bf FIGURE CAPTIONS}
439: \end{center}
440:
441: \figcaption{Spectrum and map of the 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ transition of CH$_3$CH$_2$CN.
442: The spectrum, which was taken from the entire region of mapped emission, is hanning smoothed over
443: 3 channels. The rms noise level of $\sim$7 mJy beam$^{-1}$ is shown at the left. The systemic LSR velocity of +3.9 km
444: s$^{-1}$ is shown as a vertical dashed line. The contour map of the 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ transition
445: of CH$_3$CH$_2$CN is shown superimposed on 0.7 cm continuum emission (grayscale). The contour levels
446: are -0.045, 0.045, 0.060, 0.075 and 0.09 Jy beam$^{-1}$ (0.045 Jy beam$^{-1}$ = 5 $\sigma$). The synthesized beamwidth is shown
447: at the bottom left of the map.}
448:
449: \figcaption{Spectrum and map of the 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ A and E state transitions of CH$_3$OCHO.
450: The spectrum, which was taken from the entire region of mapped emission, is hanning smoothed over
451: 3 channels. The rms noise level of $\sim$2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ is shown at the left.
452: The average frequency of the A and E state transitions appears at an LSR velocity of +3.9 km s$^{-1}$.
453: The contour map of the CH$_3$OCHO emission is shown superimposed on 0.7 cm continuum
454: emission (grayscale). The contour levels are -0.008, -0.010, 0.010, 0.012, 0.014 and 0.016 Jy beam$^{-1}$
455: (0.010 Jy beam$^{-1}$ = 5 $\sigma$). The synthesized beamwidth is shown at the bottom left of the map.}
456:
457: \figcaption{Spectrum and map of the 2$_{02}$-1$_{01}$ transition of HCOOH.
458: The spectrum, which was taken from the southernmost region of mapped emission
459: toward core B, is hanning smoothed over 3 channels. The rms noise level of
460: $\sim$2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ is shown at the left. The spectrum shows the HCOOH
461: emission is centered at the systemic LSR velocity of +3.9 km s$^{-1}$ (vertical dashed line).
462: The contour map of the HCOOH emission is shown superimposed on 0.7 cm continuum
463: emission (grayscale). The contour levels are -0.007, -0.009, 0.011, 0.014, 0.016 and 0.018 Jy beam$^{-1}$
464: (0.011 Jy beam$^{-1}$ = 5 $\sigma$). The synthesized beamwidth is shown at the bottom left of the map.}
465:
466: \figcaption{Spectrum and maps of the $J$=1-0, $v$=0 transition of SiO. The spectrum of SiO was averaged
467: over the emission regions and is hanning smoothed over 3 channels. The spectrum shows a redshifted and
468: blueshifted components of SiO emission approximately centered at the systemic LSR velocity of
469: +3.9 km s$^{-1}$ (vertical dashed line). The 1 $\sigma$ rms noise level of $\sim$2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ is
470: shown on the left. The contour map of the SiO emission is superimposed on the 0.7 cm continuum
471: emission (grayscale) and shows the location of the redshifted and blueshifted emission peaks.
472: The contour levels are -0.008, -0.010, 0.010, 0.011, 0.012, 0.013 and 0.014 Jy beam$^{-1}$
473: (0.010 Jy beam$^{-1}$ = 5 $\sigma$). The synthesized beamwidth is shown at the
474: bottom left of the map. Also shown in the map is the location of the absorption trough of the inverse
475: P Cygni profile (filled circle) of the $^{12}$CO emission shown in Figure 5.}
476:
477: \figcaption{Map and spectrum of the $J$=2-1 transition of $^{12}$CO at 230.538 GHz taken with the BIMA array.
478: The contour map of the $^{12}$CO emission is superimposed on the 1 mm continuum
479: emission (grayscale) and shows the location of the redshifted absorption and blueshifted emission.
480: The contour levels are -5.50, -5.00, -4.50, -4.00, -3.50, 2.25, 3.00, 3.75, 4.50, 5.25 and 6.00 Jy beam$^{-1}$.
481: The synthesized beamwidth of 3.$''$2$\times$0.$''$8 is shown at the bottom left of the map. The spectrum
482: of the $J$=2-1 transition of $^{12}$CO at 230.538 GHz was taken at a location surrounding the
483: absorption and emission peaks and has a 1 $\sigma$ rms noise level of $\sim$1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ shown on the left of the
484: spectrum. The systemic LSR velocity of +3.9 km s$^{-1}$ is shown as a vertical dashed line.}
485:
486: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
487: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
488: \tablewidth{34pc}
489: \tablecolumns{7}
490: \tablecaption{Molecular Line Parameters for VLA Observations}
491: \tablehead{
492: \colhead{} & \colhead{Transition} & \colhead{Frequency\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{E$_u$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\mu_a$} & \colhead{} \\
493: \colhead{Molecule} & \colhead{$J'_{K-,K+}$-$J''_{K-,K+}$} & \colhead{(MHz)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{S} & \colhead{(D)} & \colhead{Reference}\\
494: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)}\\
495: }
496: \startdata
497: SiO & 1-0,$v$=0 & 43,423.864(22) & 2.085 & 1.00 & 3.10 & b\\
498: CH$_3$CH$_2$CN & 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ & 43,516.200(8) & 7.380 & 4.80 & 3.85 & c\\
499: HCOOH & 2$_{02}$-1$_{01}$ & 44,911.750(50) & 3.238 & 2.00 & 1.39 & d\\
500: CH$_3$OCHO & 4$_{14}$-3$_{13}$ E & 45,395.755(16) & 6.187 & 3.80 & 1.63 & e\\
501: & 4$_{14}$-3$_{13}$ A & 45,397.394(16) & 6.187 & 3.80 & 1.63 & e\\
502: \enddata
503: \tablenotetext{a}{Uncertainties in parentheses refer to the least significant digit and are 2 $\sigma$ values.}
504: \tablenotetext{b}{(Lovas \& Krupenie 1974)}
505: \tablenotetext{c}{(Lovas 1982)}
506: \tablenotetext{d}{Willemot et al.\ 1980}
507: \tablenotetext{e}{Oesterling et al.\ 1999}
508: \end{deluxetable}
509:
510: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
511: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
512: \tablewidth{37pc}
513: \tablecolumns{7}
514: \tablecaption{Molecular Column Densities}
515: \tablehead{
516: \colhead{} & \colhead{$v_{LSR}$ Range} & \colhead{$\int$I dv} & \colhead{T$_{rot}$} & \colhead{$N_{T}$} & \colhead{$X$} \\
517: \colhead{Molecule} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(Jy bm$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{($\times$10$^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$)} & \colhead{($\times$10$^{-9}$)}\\
518: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} \\
519: }
520: \startdata
521: CH$_3$CH$_2$CN & +0.0 to +10.0 & 0.34(9) & 54 & 5.2(1.4) & 6.9(1.4)\\
522: CH$_3$OCHO & -5.0 to +16.0 & $>$0.22 & 40 & $>$187 & $>$11.7\\
523: HCOOH & +0.0 to +8.0 & 0.07(3) & 40 & 41(17) & 2.5(1.7)\\
524: \enddata
525:
526: \tablecomments{SiO is likely masering and is therefore not included in this table (see text).}
527: \end{deluxetable}
528:
529: \begin{figure}
530: \epsscale{0.65}
531: \plotone{f1.eps}
532: \centerline{Figure 1.}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: \begin{figure}
536: \epsscale{0.65}
537: \plotone{f2.eps}
538: \centerline{Figure 2.}
539: \end{figure}
540:
541: \begin{figure}
542: \epsscale{0.650}
543: \plotone{f3.eps}
544: \centerline{Figure 3.}
545: \end{figure}
546:
547: \begin{figure}
548: \epsscale{0.9}
549: \plotone{f4.eps}
550: \centerline{Figure 4.}
551: \end{figure}
552:
553: \begin{figure}
554: \epsscale{0.65}
555: \plotone{f5.eps}
556: \centerline{Figure 5.}
557: \end{figure}
558:
559:
560:
561:
562: \end{document}
563: