1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: %\usepackage{psfig}
8:
9:
10: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
11: %\documentclass[manuscript,emulateapj5]{aastex}
12:
13: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
14: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
15:
16: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
17: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
18: %% use the longabstract style option.
19: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
20:
21: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
22: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
23: %% the \begin{document} command.
24: %%
25: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
26: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
27: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
28: %% for information.
29:
30:
31: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
32:
33: %\slugcomment{Any extra title page comments can go here}
34:
35: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
36: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
37: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
38: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
39: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
40: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
41:
42: \shorttitle{A MERLIN Observation of PSR B1951+32 \& Plerion}
43: \shortauthors{Golden et al.}
44:
45: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
46: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
47:
48: \begin{document}
49:
50: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
51: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
52: %% you desire.
53:
54: \title{A MERLIN Observation of PSR B1951+32 and its associated Plerion}
55:
56: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
57: %% author and affiliation information.
58: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
59: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
60: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
61: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
62:
63: \author{A. Golden\altaffilmark{1},
64: S. Bourke\altaffilmark{1}, G. Clyne\altaffilmark{1}, R.F. Butler\altaffilmark{1},
65: A. Shearer\altaffilmark{1},T.W.B. Muxlow\altaffilmark{2},W.F. Brisken\altaffilmark{3}}
66:
67: \altaffiltext{1}{Computational Astrophysics Laboratory, I.T. Building,
68: National University of Ireland, Galway; agolden,stephen,ger,ray,shearer@it.nuigalway.ie}
69: \altaffiltext{2}{Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, Cheshire
70: SK11 9DL, UK; twbm@jb.man.ac.uk}
71: \altaffiltext{3}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, Socorro, NM 87801; wbrisken@nrao.edu}
72:
73: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
74: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
75: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
76: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
77: %% editorial office after submission.
78:
79: \begin{abstract}
80: In an investigative 16 hour L band observation using the
81: MERLIN radio interferometric array, we have resolved both the
82: pulsar PSR B1951+32 and structure within the flat spectral radio
83: continuum region, believed to be the synchrotron nebula associated
84: with the interaction of the pulsar and its `host' supernova remnant
85: CTB 80. The extended structure we see, significant at
86: $\sim$ 4.5 $\sigma$, is of dimensions
87: 2.5" $\times$ 0.75", and suggests a sharp bow shaped arc
88: of shocked emission, which is correlated with similar
89: structure observed in lower resolution radio
90: maps and X-ray images. Using this MERLIN data as a new
91: astrometric reference for other multiwavelength data we
92: can place the pulsar at one edge of the HST reported optical
93: synchrotron knot, ruling out previous suggested optical
94: counterparts, and allowing an elementary analysis of the
95: optical synchrotron emission which appears to trail the
96: pulsar. The latter is possibly a consequence of
97: pulsar wind replenishment, and we suggest
98: that the knot is a result of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities.
99: These being so, it suggests a dynamical nature to the optical knot,
100: which will require high resolution optical observations to confirm. \\
101: \end{abstract}
102:
103: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
104: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
105: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
106: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
107:
108: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
109: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
110: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
111: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
112: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
113: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
114: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
115: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
116: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
117: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
118: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
119: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
120:
121: \keywords{ISM: individual (CTB 80) --- ISM: supernova remnants --- pulsars: individual (PSR B1951+32) --- stars:neutron
122: --- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal}
123:
124: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
125: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
126: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
127: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
128: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
129: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
130: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
131: %% each reference.
132:
133:
134:
135: \section{Introduction}
136:
137: Recent subarcsecond Hubble Space Telescope (HST) \& Chandra
138: observations of the inner Crab
139: Nebula have yielded evidence of dynamic
140: activity in close proximity to the pulsar
141: with various shocks and `wisps' evolving
142: in terms of position, morphology and luminosity over timescales
143: of days to weeks, implying local velocities of order 0.7c
144: (Hester et al. 1996; Weisskopf et al. 2000).
145: Observations in the radio using the Very Large Array (VLA) show
146: evidence for similar time-varying morphological
147: changes within the nebula but at scales of order 1" (Bietenholz et al. 2001).
148:
149: Such multiwavelength
150: observations challenge our understanding of these \\
151: pulsar/plerion/supernova remnant (SNR) associations.
152: Considering the Crab Nebula, the estimated current
153: rate of particle injection derived via nebular
154: X-ray luminosity differs markedly from the
155: historical average rate determined from the radio
156: emitting particles (Arons, 1998; Atoyan, 1999).
157: The nebula's emission may be modelled as
158: a function of the particle injection spectrum
159: related to the spin down energy of the pulsar,
160: yet the exact processes which link the thermalising
161: pulsar wind to the observed synchrotron emission
162: are not clear (Reynolds \& Chevalier, 1984), neither
163: is our understanding of the particle acceleration
164: processes within the pulsar wind in the first place
165: (Gallant \& Arons, 1994; Lou, 1993).
166:
167: Another `young' pulsar/SNR/X-ray plerion association that
168: provides a working laboratory with which to test our
169: understanding of such interactions following on from the
170: Crab is that of the young radio, X-ray
171: and $\gamma$-ray pulsar PSR B1951+32 associated
172: with the CTB 80 SNR.
173: Early radio and
174: X-ray observations noted a central plerion/spectrally flat
175: region to the SW of the SNR, within which PSR B1951+32 was
176: detected, located within a concentration of nebular
177: emission towards one edge of the flat spectral region
178: (e.g. Strom et al. 1984). The association
179: is valid based on this clear interaction between
180: pulsar and remnant, with similar pulsar canonical
181: age (107 kyr) and dynamically derived SNR age
182: (9.6 $\times$ 10$^{4}$d$_{2.5kpc}$).
183:
184: Strom (1987) performed a detailed survey
185: of this central flat region with the VLA at various
186: frequencies and baselines, all yielding maps with
187: resolutions $\sim$ 1", and
188: recent surveys using the WSRT at 6 cm
189: (Strom \& Stappers, 2000) have
190: indicated considerable complexity within the spectrally flat
191: core. Strom was the first to comment on the `hot spot',
192: located to the SW of the pulsar, suggesting that it
193: was likely a consequence of the pulsar wind interacting
194: with the remnant and creating a `wisp' like structure
195: similar to that observed in close proximity to the
196: Crab pulsar.
197:
198: In contrast to the young Crab, it appears that the older
199: PSR B1951+32 has caught up with its expanding remnant,
200: resulting in the observed complex multiwavelength emission.
201: As such, it represents an extremely interesting stage
202: in the life cycle of a pulsar, when the neutron star
203: penetrates and interacts with the remnant/swept up ISM region.
204: Precisely what radiation gets emitted, and where, will define the
205: constraints to any subsequent modelling efforts.
206:
207:
208: Moon et al. (2004) have recently reported an optical/X-ray
209: analysis of the system using archival HST and Chandra data,
210: in addition to new ground based optical and IR observations.
211: The Chandra data clearly shows a cometary pulsar wind nebula
212: which appears to be confined by a bow shock produced by the
213: high velocity motion of the pulsar, which corresponds to Strom's
214: previously defined radio `hot spot'. Optical/IR photometry have also indicated the presence
215: of a synchrotron 'knot', as originally reported by Hester (2000)
216: embedded within the cometary head observed by Chandra.
217: Previous
218: attempts to isolate putative optical counterparts to PSR B1951+32
219: have been concentrated around this structure, which is believed
220: to be closely related to the pulsar - thus far two candidates
221: have been proposed which are within the VLA error ellipse (Butler
222: et al. 2002). Moon et al. (2004), based on their analysis, argue that
223: only one is likely, and even then it is generally agreed that
224: the `point source' involved may well be a background star or
225: non-uniformity in the knot itself.
226:
227:
228: The key to resolving many of the outstanding aspects of the
229: the system's multiwavelength geometry is a rigorous astrometric
230: reference frame.
231: In this short letter we report a 16 hour L band observation
232: with the MERLIN radio interferometer.
233: Both objects were resolved at a resolution
234: of 150 mas, and despite the relatively low signal to noise of the extended
235: emission associated with the shock front, we have been able
236: to re-examine existing multiwavelength data using the MERLIN
237: data as the astrometric reference.
238:
239:
240: \section{Observations \& Data Analysis}
241: On January 19th 2002, a 16 hour L-band MERLIN\footnote{MERLIN, a UK National
242: Facility operated by the University of Manchester at Jodrell Bank
243: Observatory on behalf of PPARC}
244: observation (without the Lovell Telescope) was performed
245: on the central spectrally `flat' region centred on PSR B1951+32.
246: The phase calibrator used was 1951+355, whose position
247: is tied into the ICRF, with a positional accuracy
248: of $<$ 0.5 mas.
249: The correlator was configured to operate at 1658 MHz
250: with a total bandwidth of 16 MHz on 32 channels.
251: The data was processed and analysed within the AIPS
252: evironment.
253: Initial maps
254: showed contamination from a bright off-axis radio source.
255: This was identified as MG3 J195211+3248 ($\alpha ~ \sim$ 19:52:15.7811,
256: $\delta ~ \sim$ 32:49:36.299), a symmetric
257: double radio galaxy, with a measured flux of $\sim$ 80 mJy.
258: Its contribution was subsequently CLEANed out.
259:
260:
261: \subsection{Imaging the Pulsar and Environs}
262: The pulsar is clearly evident in figure 1, and its position as obtained
263: during this observation with MERLIN is determined to be
264: $\alpha$ $\sim$ 19:52:58.204 ($\pm$0.002$\arcsec$), $\delta$ $\sim$ +32:52:40.531 ($\pm$0.025$\arcsec$) (2452294 JD).
265: PSR B1951+32 was detected as a point source in this observation,
266: and there was no evidence for scatter-broadening.
267: There is also a significant ($\sim$ 4.5 $\sigma$) detection of
268: a structure within the anticipated `hot spot' some 3" SW
269: of the pulsar, of approximate
270: dimensions 2.5" $\times$ 0.75", with the pulsar's motion approximately
271: bisecting the observed emission.
272:
273: Despite being relatively weak in
274: terms of signal to noise, we note that this `bead-like' arc of emission
275: corresponds with lower-resolution data obtained with the VLA\footnote{The National Radio
276: Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
277: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
278: We estimate that an excess flux density
279: of $\sim$ 2.84 mJy along the narrow (1-2 beams in width) linear
280: feature on top of the larger ($\sim$ 1") structure.
281: This is similar to our determination of $\sim$ 2.59 mJy of
282: excess flux relative to the shell from the complementary VLA data.
283: Whilst the errors of these measurements is likely to be larger
284: than their difference, this suggests that the shock structure is
285: not over resolved in the MERLIN observations, and that the
286: actual emission region is spatially limited.
287: Thus, whilst we are confident that MERLIN has resolved fine-structure
288: within the `hot spot' observed previously, although given the low signal to
289: noise ratio, one must be cautious to avoid over-analysing the MERLIN data.
290:
291:
292: \subsection{The Optical Synchrotron Knot}
293: The optical knot, first identified by Hester (2000) in the original
294: HST F547M observations, can now be placed in its correct astrometric
295: context given this MERLIN dataset. To do this, we must astrometrically calibrate the
296: HST image to a significantly better degree than what is
297: provided via the GSC. This is done by referencing the HST
298: data to the 2MASS Point Source Catalog. The limiting astrometric accuracy of
299: the latter is $\sim$ 100-150 mas (1 sigma) relative to the Hipparcos/Tycho
300: coordinate system, which realizes the ICRS for optical data.
301:
302: The image was astrometrically calibrated to the ICRS via the
303: following fitting process. 40 stars common to both the WFPC2
304: and the 2MASS Point Source Catalog were identified, the former
305: extracted as pixel coordinates using DAOPHOT and were then corrected for
306: the known geometric distortions. These
307: pixel coordinates are each internally accurate to $<<$100 mas,
308: since the stars have a PSF FWHM of $\sim$125 mas.
309:
310: The initial matching was based on the pipeline World Coordinate
311: System (WCS) of the HST image. The first fit showed that this
312: WCS was approx. 500 mas systematically in error. A second matching and
313: fitting iteration was performed, 2nd-order CCMAP fits used a 2-sigma rejection
314: cutoff to remove input stars of lower astrometric fidelity.
315: The final iteration resulted in 9 of the 40 input stars being
316: rejected and 31 stars surviving to define the fit for a new WCS
317: solution, with a final fit rms of 105 mas in RA and 101 mas in Dec.
318: This refined WCS was then written into the header of the HST
319: image.
320:
321: Comparison with the MERLIN astrometry is thus performed purely
322: by reference to this WCS. Therefore, we stress that the
323: radio-optical comparison is in no way dependent on any dubious
324: procedure such as trying to tie together one or more features
325: which might appear to be in common to the HST and MERLIN images.
326: Their respective calibrations to the ICRS were performed via
327: completely independent and robust means, and are anchored
328: within the WCS schema.
329:
330: In figure 2 we overlay the 2MASS
331: corrected HST image on our L band MERLIN map, using the
332: WCS header information in both cases. Hester's knot is
333: apparent in the field centre. Morphologically, the knot resembles a teardrop-like
334: structure, of dimensions 0.8" $\times$ 1.3". We also
335: show the position of the radio pulsar and
336: the shock front. Astrometric integration of the
337: MERLIN data yields an overall accuracy in registering the optical to the
338: radio frame of $\sim$ 105 mas.
339: Within the combined astrometric errors as defined by
340: the WCS solutions, this alignment makes a powerful case
341: for the pulsar and Hester's nebula to be associated.
342: The pulsar is located at the lower south-west extent of the optical
343: knot region. Knowing the approximate direction of the pulsar's motion, this
344: suggests that the knot's observed optical emission is a consequence of shocked
345: pulsar wind material and/or shocked nebular material during the transit
346: of PSR B1951+32.
347:
348: Ram pressure balance between
349: relativistic pulsar winds and the ambient medium may be represented
350: as $\rho_{a} \nu^{2}_{\rm psr} \sim \dot{E}/4 \pi \Omega c r^{2}_{s}$,
351: with $\rho_{a}$ the ambient medium density, $\dot{E}$ the pulsar's
352: spin-down energy, the $4 \pi \Omega$ term the solid angle of the
353: pulsar wind flow and $r_{s}$ the stagnation radius - $c$ being the
354: speed of light. Typically in these treatments, the ram balance
355: implies equipartition of particle and magnetic field pressure at the
356: shock front, and this allows one to express the local magnetic field
357: as $B_{eq}(\mu G) \sim 50(n_{H}/{\rm cm^{3}})^{1/2} (v_{psr}/100 {\rm km s^{-1}}))$,
358: or equivalently $B_{eq}(\mu G) \sim 200 \Omega^{-1/2} (\dot{E}/10^{36}
359: {\rm erg s^{-1})}^{1/2}(r_{s}/0.01 {\rm pc}^{-1})$
360: with $n_{H}$ the hydrogen number density.
361:
362: The recent VLA observations
363: of Migliazzo et al. (2002) have determined $v_{psr}$ = 240 km s$^{-1}$.
364: Chandra data imply $r_{s}$ = 0.03 pc (or 3" at 2 kpc)
365: and $\dot{E}$ = 3.7 $\times$ 10$^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.
366: Assuming $\Omega$ $<$ 1, Moon et al. (2004) argue that $B_{eq}$ $>$ 100 $\mu$G.
367: These authors indicate that this result correlates with earlier Hester \& Kulkarni (1989)
368: results of a pre-shock $n_{H}$ of 50 cm$^{-3}$ and $B_{eq}$ $\sim$ 600 $\mu$G.
369: Moon et al. (2004) then argue that if one assumes $B$ $>$ 100 $\mu$G in the X-ray
370: nebula, then the synchrotron cooling time of these X-ray photons is
371: $t_{\rm sync} \sim 40 E^{-1/2}_{\rm keV} (B/100 \mu G)^{-3/2}$ or $<$ 40 yrs.
372: Given the nebula's spatial extent along the pulsar's axis of motion
373: of $\sim$ 20", and PSR B1951+32's proper motion of
374: $\sim$ 25 mas/yr, this points towards the nebulae being constantly replenished
375: by the pulsar wind, certainly in X-rays.
376:
377: Optically, the knot's length
378: of $\approx$ 1.3" and the pulsar's proper motion suggest
379: a lifetime of $\sim$ 50 years.
380: Assuming the knot's emission is a consequence of `cooling' synchrotron
381: particles, one can use this crossing time as the cooling time, and the energy of these
382: optical photons to constrain the previous equation to yield a value for
383: $B_{eq}$, which comes to $\sim$ 600 $\mu$G,
384: not inconsistent with the previous studies.
385:
386: However, this analysis suggests that the
387: observed optical emission is entirely explicable as synchrotron emission
388: from the pulsar wind particles left behind after passage of the pulsar -
389: without the requirement of particle replenishment by the same pulsar
390: wind. Moon et al. 2004 used particle replenishment
391: to justify their analysis of the Chandra data.
392: For replenishment to be valid (Kaspi et al. 2001), the
393: freshly shocked wind particles must be continuously fed `backwards'
394: with a velocity that is high enough given their cooling times.
395: Given the estimated cooling times and dimensions of the optical knot,
396: an X-ray knot associated with it would have a particle cooling time
397: of $\sim$ 0.3 to 9 years, with corresponding particle flow velocities
398: of $\sim$ 185 - 260 to km s$^{-1}$ (optical) and 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{3}$ to 5 $\times$
399: 10$^{4}$ km s$^{-1}$ (X-ray).
400:
401:
402: An alternative interpretation is that the observed optical
403: synchrotron knot is a consequence of quasi-stationary
404: shock structures in the pulsar wind outflow behind the
405: pulsar (Lou 1998). At
406: various spin latitudes, reverse fast MHD shocks can appear
407: quasistationary when their propagation speeds relative to
408: the pulsar wind are comparable to the relativistic outflow.
409: The most likely source of disturbances which explain why
410: these wisps and knots appear where they are observed are
411: slightly inhomogeneous wind streams
412: emanating from the rapidly spinning pulsar. A slower wind
413: stream will eventually be caught up by a faster wind stream
414: to trigger forward and reverse fast MHD shock waves in the
415: distant pulsar wind.
416:
417: Enhanced synchrotron emission is expected from these knots
418: due to the pitch-angle scattering of MHD shock-energised
419: relativistic particles. There are various mechanisms available
420: to energise particles to high energies from plasma turbulence,
421: from both the forward and reverse fast relativistic MHD shocks
422: themselves as well as magnetic reconnection in the pulsar wind.
423: Collectively, they strongly suggest the likelihood of a dynamic
424: component to this optical knot.
425:
426: Considering that PSR B1951+32 possesses
427: an estimated transverse velocity of $\sim$ 240 km s$^{-1}$, a counter knot may be
428: `smothered' by the bow shock formed by the pulsar's passage
429: towards the SW of the remnant. At the bow shock
430: itself injected particles from the pulsar wind are advected behind the pulsar
431: while some of the particles diffuse across the bow shock and into the shell
432: of the SNR thereby rejuvenating the shells emission (van der Swaluw et al. 2002,
433: Shull et. al 1989), which we see to the south-west of this remnant.
434: Therefore the MHD wind streams may be advected away before they have an
435: opportunity to interact, and therefore do not form a knot in the scenario
436: proposed by Lou (1998).
437: Taking into account recent simulations (Buccaniti 2002, Gaensler et al. 2004),
438: the knot seems to lie in the subsonic region that exists behind the pulsar and it
439: is surrounded by the supersonic region created by the back flowing material from
440: the bow-shock. At the interface between these two regions there may exist shearing
441: forces which may explain the asymmetry of the optical knot which is evident in
442: figure 2.
443:
444:
445: \subsection{Implications for Proposed Optical Counterparts to PSR B1951+32}
446:
447: There are strong grounds for the detection of an optical counterpart
448: to PSR B1951+32, based on empirically derived relationships between other known
449: optical pulsars (Shearer \& Golden, 2001), and also on the fact the
450: pulsar is a known X-ray and putative $\gamma$-ray pulsar. A previous
451: analysis of this same HST data by Butler et al. (2002) suggested two
452: potential optical counterparts which were coincident with the best
453: reported VLA astrometry at that time - one a clear point source to the
454: SW of the knot, the other embedded within the knot towards its upper
455: NW edge. Moon et al. (2004) state that the former counterpart does not
456: satisfy more rigorous astrometry, and propose that the latter is
457: the only remaining candidate, albeit with the reasonable caveat that
458: this latter source may be a background star or a transient localised
459: emission region within the knot - a point also made by Butler et al. (2002).
460: Our MERLIN astrometry rules out
461: any association between it and the pulsar. However, it is reasonable
462: to consider the possibility that the proposed counterpart is (was?) a non-uniformity within
463: the synchrotron nebula. This would in turn support the idea that the
464: optical structure we observe is a direct consequence of the pulsar
465: wind outflow, and again argues the case for the knot to be a
466: dynamically evolving structure.
467:
468:
469: \section{Conclusions}
470:
471: We report the first high resolution radio observation of the inner
472: PSR B1951+32 plerion using MERLIN at L band.We have resolved both the pulsar
473: and apparent fine structure within the `hot spot' identified at lower
474: resolution and believed to be a consequence of the pulsar wind interacting
475: with swept up ISM/SNR material.
476:
477: We have used our MERLIN data to register the astrometrically corrected
478: archival HST observations of the field. Combined, these data indicate
479: that the previously identified optical `knot' of synchrotron emission
480: extends behind the pulsar, along a line that bisects the shock front emission.
481: The dimensions of the optical knot and the VLA determined
482: proper motion argue for a synchrotron cooling time that is consistent with particle
483: replenishment from the pulsar wind.
484:
485: The formation of the knot can also be attributed
486: to the mechanisms outlined in Lou (1998) with the interaction of MHD wind streams,
487: whilst the knot's luminosity can be maintained by particle injection from the pulsar wind.
488: Variations in the knot's luminosity and morphology are anticipated
489: as successive quasi-periodic disturbances emanate
490: from the pulsar. This being so it argues
491: for a fundamentally dynamical nature to the observed synchrotron knot
492: which may only be really discernible using future HST or ground-based
493: adaptive optics observations.
494:
495: Finally, the MERLIN data definitively rules out the putative optical counterparts to
496: PSR B1951+32 suggested by Butler et al. (2002) and Moon et al. (2004),
497: and provides an unambiguous error box with which to assist future
498: high time resolution searches.
499:
500:
501:
502: \section*{Acknowledgments}
503: John Cunniffe is thanked for his counsel in certain aspects of the manuscript.
504: The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Enterprise Ireland under
505: grant award SC/2001/0322. SB acknowledges support of an EU Marie Curie
506: Fellowship whilst at the Jodrell Bank Training Site for Radio
507: Astronomy which is funded by the EC. The authors are very happy to
508: acknowledge support of PPARC in the UK and the NRAO in the US
509: for access to MERLIN and the VLA respectively.
510:
511:
512:
513: \begin{thebibliography}{}
514:
515: \bibitem[Arons(1998)]{1998MmSAI..69..989A} Arons, J.\ 1998, Memorie della
516: Societa Astronomica Italiana, 69, 989
517:
518: \bibitem[Atoyan(1999)]{1999A&A...346L..49A} Atoyan, A.~M.\ 1999, \aap, 346,
519: L49
520:
521: \bibitem[Bietenholz et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...560..254B} Bietenholz, M.~F.,
522: Frail, D.~A., \& Hester, J.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 560, 254
523:
524: \bibitem[Bucciantini(2002)]{2002A&A...393..629B} Bucciantini, N.\ 2002,
525: \aap, 393, 629
526:
527: \bibitem[Butler, Golden, \& Shearer(2002)]{2002A&A...395..845B} Butler,
528: R.~F., Golden, A., \& Shearer, A.\ 2002, \aap, 395, 845
529:
530: \bibitem[Gallant \& Arons(1994)]{1994ApJ...435..230G} Gallant, Y.~A.~\&
531: Arons, J.\ 1994, \apj, 435, 230
532:
533: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616..383G} Gaensler, B.~M., van
534: der Swaluw, E., Camilo, F., Kaspi, V.~M., Baganoff, F.~K., Yusef-Zadeh, F.,
535: \& Manchester, R.~N.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 383
536:
537: \bibitem[Hester \& Kulkarni(1989)]{1989ApJ...340..362H} Hester, J.~J.~\&
538: Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 1989, \apj, 340, 362
539:
540: \bibitem[Hester et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...456..225H} Hester, J.~J., et al.\
541: 1996, \apj, 456, 225
542:
543: \bibitem[Hester(2000)]{2000AAS...197.8216H} Hester, J.\ 2000, Bulletin of
544: the American Astronomical Society, 32, 1542
545:
546: \bibitem[Kaspi, Gotthelf, Gaensler, \& Lyutikov(2001)]{2001ApJ...562L.163K}
547: Kaspi, V.~M., Gotthelf, E.~V., Gaensler, B.~M., \& Lyutikov, M.\ 2001,
548: \apjl, 562, L163
549:
550: \bibitem[Lou(1993)]{1993ApJ...418..709L} Lou, Y.\ 1993, \apj, 418, 709
551:
552: \bibitem[Lou(1998)]{1998MNRAS.294..443L} Lou, Y.\ 1998, \mnras, 294, 443
553:
554: \bibitem[Migliazzo et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...567L.141M} Migliazzo, J.~M.,
555: Gaensler, B.~M., Backer, D.~C., Stappers, B.~W., van der Swaluw, E., \&
556: Strom, R.~G.\ 2002, \apjl, 567, L141
557:
558: \bibitem[Moon et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...610L..33M} Moon, D.-S., et al.\ 2004,
559: \apjl, 610, L33
560:
561: \bibitem[Reynolds \& Chevalier(1984)]{1984ApJ...278..630R} Reynolds,
562: S.~P.~\& Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1984, \apj, 278, 630
563:
564: \bibitem[Shearer \& Golden(2001)]{2001ApJ...547..967S} Shearer, A.~\&
565: Golden, A.\ 2001, \apj, 547, 967
566:
567: \bibitem[Shull, Fesen, \& Saken(1989)]{1989ApJ...346..860S} Shull, J.~M.,
568: Fesen, R.~A., \& Saken, J.~M.\ 1989, \apj, 346, 860
569:
570:
571: \bibitem[Strom, Angerhofer, \& Dickel(1984)]{1984A&A...139...43S} Strom,
572: R.~G., Angerhofer, P.~E., \& Dickel, J.~R.\ 1984, \aap, 139, 43
573:
574: \bibitem[Strom(1987)]{1987ApJ...319L.103S} Strom, R.~G.\ 1987, \apjl, 319,
575: L103
576:
577: \bibitem[Strom \& Stappers(2000)]{2000puas.conf..509S} Strom, R.~G.~\&
578: Stappers, B.~W.\ 2000, ASP Conf.~Ser.~202: IAU Colloq.~177: Pulsar
579: Astronomy - 2000 and Beyond, 509
580:
581: \bibitem[van der Swaluw, Achterberg, \& Gallant(2002)]{2002nssr.conf..135V}
582: van der Swaluw, E., Achterberg, A., \& Gallant, Y.~A.\ 2002, ASP
583: Conf.~Ser.~271: Neutron Stars in Supernova Remnants, 135
584:
585:
586: \bibitem[Weisskopf et al.(2000)]{2000HEAD....5.3604W} Weisskopf, M.~C., et
587: al.\ 2000, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 32, 1248
588:
589:
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592:
593:
594: %% ---------------- figures here -------------------------------------
595:
596: \clearpage
597:
598: \begin{figure}
599: \plotone{fig1.ps}
600: \vspace{-60mm}
601: \caption{VLA grey-scale map with superimposed MERLIN L band contour map. The pulsar is
602: clearly evident in the image centre as both a VLA and MERLIN point
603: source. The MERLIN resolved contoured shock-structure is to the SW of the pulsar,
604: coincident with the poorer resolution VLA data, which was obtained
605: in July 2003 in the A configuration. The rms noise level for the MERLIN
606: data is 1.0 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ Jy/beam, and natural weighting was used in
607: its analysis.}
608: \label{merlin2}
609: \end{figure}
610:
611: \clearpage
612:
613: \begin{figure}
614: \plotone{fig2.ps}
615: \vspace{-60mm}
616: \caption{Smoothed inverse grey-scale HST F547M image of the central region,
617: showing the `teardrop'
618: like optical synchrotron knot as originally marked out by Hester (2000).
619: The white ellipses in the centre show the 1 and 3 $\sigma$
620: positions of the radio pulsar with respect to the optical frame as defined
621: by the WCS. The black
622: contours show the MERLIN map (the pulsar has been removed for clarity.)
623: The white line shows the proper motion of the pulsar over a 100yr time frame.
624: (from Migliazzo et al. (2002).)
625: }
626: \label{hst1}
627: \end{figure}
628:
629: \end{document}
630:
631:
632:
633:
634: \label{merlin2}
635: \end{figure}
636: