1: %% This is to emulate the later appearance of the paper
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
4:
5: %% The command below calls the preprint style
6: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
7: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
8: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
9: %%
10: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11:
12: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
13:
14: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
15: \usepackage{graphicx,amssymb,amsmath,times}
16:
17:
18: \setcounter{page}{1}
19: %
20: \begin{document}
21: %Title of paper
22: \title{MAGIC observations of very high energy $\gamma$-rays from HESS J1813-178}
23:
24:
25: \author{
26: J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
27: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
28: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
29: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{d},
30: A.~Armada\altaffilmark{b},
31: M.~Asensio\altaffilmark{d},
32: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{e},
33: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{d},
34: M.~Bartelt\altaffilmark{f},
35: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{g,*},
36: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{h},
37: R.~Bavikadi\altaffilmark{i},
38: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{j},
39: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
40: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{h},
41: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
42: E.~Bisesi\altaffilmark{i},
43: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{g},
44: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
45: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
46: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{d},
47: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{k},
48: S.~Ciprini\altaffilmark{l},
49: J.~A.~Coarasa\altaffilmark{g},
50: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
51: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{d},
52: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
53: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{f},
54: V.~Danielyan\altaffilmark{k},
55: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{h},
56: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{i},
57: R.~de~los~Reyes\altaffilmark{d},
58: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{i},
59: E.~Domingo-Santamar\'\i a\altaffilmark{b},
60: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
61: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{h},
62: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
63: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{o},
64: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{n},
65: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
66: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
67: J.~Flix\altaffilmark{b},
68: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{d},
69: L.~Font\altaffilmark{e},
70: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{o},
71: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{g},
72: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{b},
73: M.~Giller\altaffilmark{j},
74: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{g},
75: D.~Hakobyan\altaffilmark{k},
76: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{g},
77: T.~Hengstebeck\altaffilmark{m},
78: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
79: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{g},
80: P.~Jacon\altaffilmark{j},
81: O.~Kalekin\altaffilmark{m},
82: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{n},
83: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{n},
84: T.~Lenisa\altaffilmark{i},
85: P.~Liebing\altaffilmark{g},
86: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{l},
87: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{p},
88: J.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{b},
89: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{d},
90: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{g},
91: F.~Lucarelli\altaffilmark{d},
92: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{g},
93: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{q},
94: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
95: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{h},
96: M.~Mart\'\i nez\altaffilmark{b},
97: K.~Mase\altaffilmark{g},
98: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{g},
99: M.~Merck\altaffilmark{a},
100: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{o},
101: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
102: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{g},
103: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{g},
104: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{g},
105: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{l},
106: E.~O\~na-Wilhelmi\altaffilmark{b},
107: R.~Ordu\~na\altaffilmark{e},
108: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{g},
109: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{d},
110: D.~Paneque\altaffilmark{g},
111: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{o},
112: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{l},
113: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{h},
114: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
115: N.~Pavel\altaffilmark{m},
116: R.~Pegna\altaffilmark{o},
117: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{h},
118: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{o},
119: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{h},
120: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{b},
121: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{f},
122: B.~Riegel\altaffilmark{a},
123: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c},
124: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{e},
125: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
126: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{h},
127: A.~S\'anchez\altaffilmark{e},
128: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{h},
129: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{h},
130: R.~Schmitt\altaffilmark{a},
131: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{m},
132: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{m},
133: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{g},
134: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{r},
135: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
136: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{l},
137: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{j},
138: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{o},
139: A.~Stepanian\altaffilmark{z},
140: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c},
141: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{l},
142: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{q},
143: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b},
144: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{g},
145: N.~Tonello\altaffilmark{g},
146: A.~Torres\altaffilmark{e},
147: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{b,}\altaffilmark{s},
148: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{o},
149: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{q},
150: A.~Vardanyan\altaffilmark{k},
151: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{i},
152: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{g},
153: T.~Wibig\altaffilmark{j},
154: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{g},
155: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{e}
156: }
157: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
158: \altaffiltext{b} {Institut de F\'\i sica d'Altes Energies, Edifici Cn., E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}
159: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Z\"urich, CH-8093 H\"onggerberg, Switzerland}
160: \altaffiltext{d} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
161: \altaffiltext{e} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
162: \altaffiltext{f} {Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany}
163: \altaffiltext{g} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
164: \altaffiltext{h} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
165: \altaffiltext{i} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
166: \altaffiltext{j} {University of \L \'od\'z, PL-90236 \L \'od\'z, Poland}
167: \altaffiltext{k} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
168: \altaffiltext{l} {Tuorla Observatory, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
169: \altaffiltext{m} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
170: \altaffiltext{n} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
171: \altaffiltext{o} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
172: \altaffiltext{p} {Universit\`a di Trieste, and INFN Trieste, I-34100 Trieste, Italy}
173:
174: \altaffiltext{q} {Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
175: \altaffiltext{r} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
176: \altaffiltext{s} {Institut de Ci\`encies de l'Espai, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}
177: \altaffiltext{z} {deceased, formerly Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine} \altaffiltext{*} {correspondence: hbartko@mppmu.mpg.de}
178:
179:
180:
181:
182: %% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
183:
184: \begin{abstract}
185:
186:
187: Recently, the HESS collaboration has reported the detection of
188: $\gamma$-ray emission above a few hundred GeV from eight new
189: sources located close to the Galactic Plane. The source HESS
190: J1813-178 has sparked particular interest, as subsequent radio
191: observations imply an association with SNR G12.82-0.02. Triggered
192: by the detection in VHE $\gamma$-rays, a positionally coincident
193: source has also been
194: found in INTEGRAL and ASCA data. In this {\it Letter} we present
195: MAGIC observations of HESS J1813-178, resulting in the detection
196: of a differential $\gamma$-ray flux consistent with a hard-slope
197: power law, described as $\mathrm{d}N_{\gamma}/(\mathrm{d}A
198: \mathrm{d}t \mathrm{d}E) = (3.3 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-12}
199: (E/\mathrm{TeV})^{-2.1 \pm 0.2} \ \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}
200: \mathrm{TeV}^{-1}$. We briefly discuss the observational technique
201: used, the procedure implemented for the data analysis, and put
202: this detection in the perspective of multifrequency observations.
203:
204:
205:
206:
207:
208:
209:
210:
211: \end{abstract}
212:
213: \keywords{gamma rays: observations, supernova remnants: individual (HESS J 1817-178, G12.82-0.02), acceleration of particles}
214:
215:
216: \section{Introduction}
217:
218:
219:
220:
221: In the Galactic Plane scan performed with the HESS Cherenkov array in 2004,
222: with a flux sensitivity of $3\%$ Crab units for
223: $\gamma$-rays above $100$ GeV, eight sources
224: were discovered \citep{Aharonian2005a,Aharonian2005b}. One of the newly detected
225: $\gamma$-ray sources was HESS J1813-178. At the beginning, HESS J1813-178 could not be
226: identified and was assumed to be a ``dark particle accelerator'', without
227: reported counterparts at lower frequencies.
228: % (referred to as HESS J1813-178 in the rest of this {\it Letter})
229:
230: Since the original discovery, HESS J1813-178 has been associated with
231: the supernova remnant
232: SNR G12.82-0.02 \citep{Ubertini2005,Brogan2005,Helfand2005}.
233: One may still not exclude this coincidence being the
234: result of just a chance association. \citet{Aharonian2005a} state a probability of (6\%) that one of their new sources is by chance spatially consistent with a SNR. Nevertheless, the properties of SNR G12.82-0.02, the
235: multifrequency spectral energy distribution, and the flux and
236: spectrum of the high energy $\gamma$-rays detected from this
237: direction appear to be consistent with a SNR origin.
238: %, the probability of which is
239: %non-negligible (6\%) in the central region of the Galaxy
240: %\citep{Aharonian2005a}.
241:
242:
243: HESS J1813-178 has been found to be nearly point like ($\sigma_{\mathrm{source}}=2.2'$) by \citet{Aharonian2005b}. Given the size of the
244: SNR, the angular resolution of the HESS telescope, and the depth of the
245: observations, the source size does not rule out a possible shell
246: origin. The $\gamma$-ray source lies at $10'$ from the center
247: of the radio source W33. This patch of the sky is highly obscured
248: and has indications of being a recent star formation region
249: \citep{Hess27}.
250:
251:
252:
253: In this {\it Letter} we present Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging
254: Cherenkov telescope (MAGIC) observations of HESS J1813-178. We
255: briefly discuss the observational technique used and the procedure
256: implemented for the data analysis. We derive a high energy $\gamma$-ray
257: spectrum of the source, and analyze it in the perspective of
258: multifrequency observations.
259:
260: \newpage
261:
262: \section{Observations}
263:
264: \begin{figure}
265: \begin{center}
266: \includegraphics[totalheight=7cm]{f1.eps}
267: \end{center}
268: \caption{ Sky map of $\gamma$-ray candidate events (background subtracted) in the
269: directions of HESS J1813-178 for SIZE $\geq 600$ ph. el.
270: (corresponding to an energy threshold of about 1~TeV). Overlayed are contours of 90 cm VLA radio (black) and ASCA X-ray data (green) from \citet{Brogan2005}. The two white stars denote the tracking positions W1,W2 in the wobble mode.}
271: \label{fig:disp_map}
272: \end{figure}
273:
274: MAGIC (see e.g., \citet{MAGIC-commissioning,CortinaICRC}) is
275: currently the largest single dish Imaging
276: Air Cherenkov Telescope (IACT) in operation. Located on the Canary
277: Island La Palma ($28.8^\circ$N, $17.8^\circ$W, 2200~m a.s.l), the
278: telescope has a 17-m diameter tessellated parabolic mirror,
279: supported by a light weight carbon fiber frame. It is equipped
280: with a high efficiency 576-pixel $3.5^\circ$ field-of-view photomultiplier
281: camera. The analogue signals are transported via optical fibers to
282: the trigger electronics
283: and are read out by a 300 MSamples/s FADC system.%the 300 MHz FADC readout.
284:
285: At La Palma, HESS J1813-178 culminates at about $47^\circ$ zenith angle (ZA). The
286: large ZA implies a high energy threshold of about 400~GeV for MAGIC
287: observations. It also provides
288: a large effective collection area (see e.g. \citet{LZA-sensitivity}).
289: The sky region around the location of HESS J1813-178 has a relatively high
290: and non-uniform level of light.
291: Within a distance of 1$^{\circ}$ from HESS J1813-178, there are no
292: stars brighter than 8$^{\mathrm{th}}$ magnitude, with the star field being
293: brighter in the region SW of the source.
294:
295:
296: The MAGIC observations were carried out in the false-source
297: tracking (wobble) mode \citep{wobble}. The sky directions (W1, W2)
298: to be tracked are chosen such that in the camera the sky field relative
299: to the source position is similar to the sky field relative to the mirror
300: source position (anti-source position). The
301: source direction is in both cases $0.4^\circ$ offset from the
302: camera center. In Fig. \ref{fig:disp_map} these two tracking
303: positions are shown by white stars. During wobble mode data
304: taking, 50\% of the data is taken at W1 and 50\% at W2, switching
305: (wobbling) between the 2 directions every 30 minutes. This
306: observation mode allowed a reliable background estimation least
307: affected by the large ZA and inhomogeneous star field.
308:
309:
310:
311:
312: \section{Data Analysis}
313:
314:
315: \begin{figure}
316: \begin{center}
317: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{f2.eps}
318: \end{center}
319: \caption{ Distributions of $\theta^2$ values for the source and
320: anti-source, see text, for SIZE $\geq 600$ ph. el.
321: (corresponding to an energy threshold of about 1~TeV).}
322: \label{fig:theta2}
323: \end{figure}
324:
325:
326:
327: HESS J1813-178 was observed for a total of 25 hours in the period
328: June-July 2005 (ZA $\leq 52^\circ$). About 15 million
329: triggers have been recorded. The calibration of the raw data of
330: the MAGIC camera is explained in \citet{MAGIC_calibration}. Image
331: cleaning tail cuts were applied: Pixels are only considered to be
332: part of the image if their reconstructed charge signal is larger
333: than 10 photo electrons (ph.el.) (core pixels) or if their charge is larger
334: than 5 ph. el.
335: and they have at least one neighboring core pixel. These tail cuts are accordingly scaled for the larger outer pixels of the MAGIC camera. The camera images
336: are characterized by image parameters \citep{Hillas_parameters}. After the image cleaning and rejection of broken runs about 10 million events remained for further analysis. These data were processed for $\gamma$/hadron
337: separation, in a similar way as described in \citet{Fegan1997}.
338:
339: In this analysis, the Random Forest method (see \citet{RF} for a
340: detailed description) was applied for the $\gamma$/hadron
341: separation and the energy estimation. For the training of the
342: Random Forest a sample of Monte Carlo (MC) generated
343: $\gamma$-showers was used to represent the $\gamma$-rays and a
344: randomly chosen sub-set of the measured data was used to represent
345: the background. The MC
346: $\gamma$-showers were generated between 47$^\circ$ and 54$^\circ$
347: ZA with energies between 10~GeV and 30~TeV. The spectral index of
348: the generated differential spectrum $dN_{\gamma}/dE \sim E^{\Gamma}$
349: was chosen as $\Gamma=-2.6$, in
350: agreement with the MAGIC-observed energy spectrum of the Crab
351: nebula \citep{Crab_MAGIC}.\footnote{In order to develop and verify
352: the analysis at high zenith angles, Crab data in the interesting
353: ZA range around 50$^{\circ}$ were taken in January 2005. From that
354: sample, we determined the Crab energy spectrum and found it to be
355: consistent with other existing measurements (see Fig.
356: \ref{fig:prelspectrum}, upper curve).} The source-position independent image parameters SIZE, WIDTH, LENGTH, CONC \citep{Hillas_parameters} and the third moment along the major image axis, as well as the source-position dependent parameter DIST \citep{Hillas_parameters}, were
357: selected to parameterize the shower images. After the training,
358: the Random Forest method allows to calculate for every event a
359: parameter, dubbed hadronness, which is a measure of the
360: probability that the event belongs to the background. The
361: $\gamma$-sample is defined by selecting showers with a hadronness
362: below a specified value. An independent sample of MC $\gamma$-showers was used to determine the efficiency of the applied cuts.
363:
364: \begin{figure}
365: \begin{center}
366: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{f3.eps}
367: \end{center}
368: \caption{ Reconstructed VHE $\gamma$-ray spectrum of HESS J1813-178.
369: The spectral index is $-2.1\pm0.2$ and the integral flux above
370: 400~GeV is about 8\% of the Crab nebula (statistical errors only).
371: The dashed line shows the spectrum of the Crab nebula as measured
372: by MAGIC \citep{Crab_MAGIC}. The dot-dashed line shows the results of the HESS collaboration \citep{Aharonian2005b}.}
373: \label{fig:prelspectrum}
374: \end{figure}
375:
376:
377: For each event, its original sky position is determined by using
378: the DISP-method \citep{wobble,Lessard2001}. At this stage only source independent image parameters are used in the RF training. Figure
379: \ref{fig:disp_map} shows the sky map of $\gamma$-ray candidate
380: events (background subtracted) from the direction of HESS J1813-178. It is smoothed with a two-dimensional Gaussian with a standard deviation of $0.1^{\circ}$. To provide a good angular resolution a tight hadronness cut and a lower SIZE cut of
381: 600 ph. el. has been applied. The SIZE cut corresponds to an energy
382: threshold of about 1~TeV. The sky map is overlayed with contours of 90
383: cm VLA radio and ASCA X-ray data from \citet{Brogan2005}. The
384: excess is centered at (RA,
385: DEC)=(18$^\mathrm{h}$13$^\mathrm{m}$27$^\mathrm{s}$,
386: -17$^\circ 48' 40''$) and coincides well with the position of SNR
387: G12.82-0.02. The systematic pointing uncertainty is estimated to
388: be $2'$ (for description of the MAGIC telescope drive system see \citet{Bretz2003}) and might in future be greatly reduced with the MAGIC starfield
389: monitor \citep{starguider}. Apart from the main excess coincident with HESS J1813-178 there are no other significant excesses present.
390:
391: Figure \ref{fig:theta2} shows the distribution of the squared
392: angular distance, $\theta^2$, between the reconstructed shower
393: direction and the nominal object position. The observed excess in
394: the direction of HESS J1813-178 has a significance of 10.6
395: standard deviations (according to equation 17 of \citet{Li_Ma1983}). Within errors the source position and the flux level
396: are compatible with the
397: measurement of HESS \citep{Aharonian2005b}.
398:
399: For the determination of the energy spectrum, the RF was trained including the source dependent image parameter DIST with respect to the nominal excess position. A loose cut on the hadronness was used. Above the low energy turn-on, the cut efficiency reaches about 70\% corresponding to an effective collection area for $\gamma$-ray showers of about 180000 m$^2$.
400: Figure \ref{fig:prelspectrum} shows the reconstructed very high
401: energy $\gamma$-ray spectrum of HESS J1813-178 after the unfolding with
402: the instrumental energy resolution. The measured spectral points are fit by a simple power law spectrum, taking the full instrumental energy resolution into account as described in \citet{Mizobuchi2005}. The result is given by ($\chi^2/\mathrm{n.d.f}=5.3/5$):
403: \begin{eqnarray*} \frac{ \mathrm{d}N_{\gamma}}{\mathrm{d}A \mathrm{d}t \mathrm{d}E} =
404: (3.3 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-12} (E/\mathrm{TeV})^{-2.1 \pm 0.2}
405: \nonumber
406: \\
407: \hspace{4cm} \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}
408: \mathrm{TeV}^{-1}.\end{eqnarray*} The quoted errors ($1\sigma$) are purely
409: statistical. The systematic error is estimated to be 35\%
410: in the flux level determination and 0.2 in the spectral index.
411: Within errors the flux is
412: steady in the time scales explored within these observations
413: (weeks), as well as in the year-long time-span between the MAGIC
414: and HESS pointings.
415:
416:
417:
418:
419: \section{Discussion}
420:
421:
422: \begin{figure}
423: \begin{center}
424: \includegraphics[height=7cm]{f4.eps}
425: \end{center}
426: \caption{Leptonic and hadronic models for the J1813-178 data.
427: Details are given in the text. Radio data is from VLA, Bonn,
428: Parkes, and Nobeyama observatories (Brogan et al. 2005), X-ray and
429: hard X-ray data are from ASCA and INTEGRAL (Ubertini et al. 2005,
430: Brogan et al. 2005).} \label{fig:modelling}
431: \end{figure}
432:
433:
434:
435:
436: Shortly after the discovery of HESS J1813-178, X-ray emission was found
437: in ASCA data coming from the source AX J1813-178 (a.k.a.
438: AGPS~273.4-17.8), \citet{Brogan2005}, also \citet{Ubertini2005}.
439: X-ray emission detected by ASCA is predominantly non-thermal, and
440: compatible with that expected from a PWN or a SNR shell. X-ray pulsed
441: emission has not been detected, but the quality and amount of the
442: data does not imply strong constraints \citep{Brogan2005}.
443: Statistically, X-ray data are not good enough to unambiguously
444: separate a pure power law from power law + thermal contribution
445: either. However, in both cases, none of the two component fits
446: yield a significantly different absorbing column density or
447: photon index when compared with a single power law fit
448: \citep{Brogan2005}. Data analysis from the INTEGRAL satellite
449: also showed a soft and luminous source at the same location, in
450: the 20-100 keV range \citep{Ubertini2005}.
451:
452: Simultaneously with this X-ray match, HESS J1813-178 was also found as
453: a non-thermal source in radio data, using observations with VLA
454: (90 and 20 cm), Bonn (3 cm), Parkes (6 cm), and Nobeyama (3 cm)
455: telescopes \citep{Brogan2005,Helfand2005}. These groups discovered
456: a shell-type supernova remnant (SNR G12.8-0.0) with a section of
457: the shell coinciding with HESS J1813-178. The radio spectral index
458: was found to be -0.48 $\pm$ 0.03. There are no known radio pulsars
459: detected at the HESS J1813-178 position \citep{Manchester2005}.
460:
461: \citet{Brogan2005} conclude that SNR G12.8-0.0 should
462: lie at or beyond the distance of W33, $\sim4$ kpc. They have derived
463: a high column density of $N_H \sim 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ from the ASCA data
464: which suggests a significant source of absorption in the foreground.
465:
466:
467: The multi-wavelength emission coming from the direction of HESS
468: J1813-178 is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:modelling}, including the
469: new MAGIC data at high energies. We have compared hadronic
470: (neutral pion decay) and leptonic (inverse Compton) emission
471: models with the high energy $\gamma$-ray data, for a review see \citet{Torres2002}. In the case of
472: hadronic models, the observed $\gamma$-ray luminosity ($2.5
473: \times 10^{34}$ erg s$^{-1}$ between 0.4 - 6 TeV, at 4 kpc)
474: implies that the required density of matter is $\sim 6$ cm$^{-3}$. The
475: $\gamma$-ray production region is presumed to be the whole SNR volume. An acceleration efficiency of hadrons of the
476: order of 3\% and a supernova power of $10^{51}$ erg was assumed.
477: Therefore,
478: relativistic hadrons need only about 2 $M_\odot$ of target mass
479: inside the SNR volume ($\sim$1.5 pc radius at 4 kpc distance) in
480: order to be consistent with the observed luminosity.
481: Alternatively, the target mass for the cosmic ray spectrum can be
482: provided by a small cloud of a few solar masses located in a
483: region close to the SNR shell. For the model shown in Fig.
484: \ref{fig:modelling}, we have assumed that the proton distribution
485: is described by $\mathrm{d}N_{p}/(\mathrm{d}V
486: \mathrm{d}E)=A_p (E/{\rm GeV})^{-\alpha} \exp{(-E/E_{\rm max})}\;
487: {\rm GeV^{-1} cm^{-3}} $ where $A_p$ is a dimensionless
488: normalization constant. We found that $\alpha=2.1$ and $E_{\rm
489: max}=100$ TeV is a good fit to the data, and that the
490: normalization constant is such that the amount of supernova
491: explosion energy converted into relativistic cosmic rays needs not
492: to be more than a few percent to agree with MAGIC observations.
493:
494:
495: For leptonic models, we have assumed a similarly described
496: distribution of relativistic electrons
497: $\mathrm{d}N_{e}/(\mathrm{d}V \mathrm{d}E)=A_e (E/{\rm
498: GeV})^{-\alpha_e} \exp{(-E/E_{\rm max, e})}\; {\rm GeV^{-1}
499: cm^{-3}} $. We found that several different inverse Compton models
500: produce reasonable good fits at high energies, e.g. $\alpha_e=2.0$
501: and $E_{\rm max, e} = 20$ TeV; and $\alpha_e=2.1$ and 2.2 and
502: $E_{\rm max, e} = 30$ TeV, all having their energetics at ease
503: with the energy assumed to be released by the supernova explosion.
504: The source of target photons for these models was assumed to be the
505: cosmic microwave background.
506: The radio spectrum at lower energies is fitted
507: best by a slope of $\alpha_e=2.0$. It is computed as
508: synchrotron emission of the same electron population.
509: In the model
510: shown in Fig. \ref{fig:modelling}, a magnetic filling fraction
511: of about 20\%, a magnetic field of 10 $\mu$G and $E_{\rm max, e} = 20$ TeV
512: and $\alpha_e=2.0$ have been adopted.
513: This model is similar to one of the models presented by \citet{Brogan2005}
514: (blue line in their Fig. 3, $E_{\rm max, e} = 30$, $\alpha_e=2.0$),
515: without yet having a high energy $\gamma$-ray spectrum.
516: The soft X-ray data (ASCA) plotted correspond to those shown by
517: Brogan et al. (2005) (black data points in their Fig. 3).
518: Our model, as well as Brogan et~al.'s, is in rough agreement with MAGIC data,
519: radio and roughly also with the X-ray data, even if the spectral behaviour in the
520: ASCA energy range (the slope) is somewhat different. That is, we have
521: priviledged the radio data in fitting this SED as an example, a better
522: X-ray fitting could be obtained at the expense of a worse radio one.
523: It is worth noticing that the hard
524: X-ray data of INTEGRAL \citep{Ubertini2005} cannot be fitted well
525: with the same electron population that is assumed to produce
526: higher and lower energy photons. Nevertheless, as one
527: can see in Fig. 2 of \citep{Ubertini2005}, the ASCA, MAGIC and HESS sources match spatially well, while the INTEGRAL/IBIS source is spatially only marginally compatible with them.
528: Further multi-frequency observations in the
529: x-ray and hard x-ray regime are needed to obtain definite
530: conclusions up to what level the leptonic models need two
531: electron populations.
532:
533:
534:
535:
536: \section{Concluding Remarks}
537:
538:
539: The detection of HESS J1813-178 using the MAGIC Telescope confirms a
540: new very high-energy $\gamma$-ray source in the Galactic Plane. A
541: reasonably large data set was collected from observations at large
542: zenith angles to infer the spectrum of this source up to energies
543: of about 10~TeV. Between 400~GeV and 10~TeV the differential energy
544: spectrum can be fitted with a power law of slope $\Gamma=-2.1\pm
545: 0.2$. These data can be used to cross-calibrate HESS and MAGIC,
546: their independent observations show satisfactory agreement.
547:
548: Multifrequency data in the radio, X-ray, and $\gamma$-ray band
549: imply a connection between HESS J1813-178 and SNR G12.82-0.02
550: \citep{Helfand2005,Ubertini2005,Brogan2005}. Generally, hard
551: $\gamma$-ray spectra are expected from SNRs due to Fermi
552: acceleration of cosmic rays \citep{Ginzburg1964,Torres2002}.
553: The hard spectrum determined for HESS J1813-178 may be a further hint
554: for its association with the SNR G12.82-0.02.
555:
556:
557: Present data are not sufficient to discriminate between existing models for different acceleration mechanisms. Future observations at lower energies with improved gamma-ray telescopes and/or the GLAST satellite will undoubtedly permit to shed more light on the existing leptonic and hadronic models. Decisive information concerning hadronic acceleration mechanisms is also likely to come from future neutrino telescopes like IceCube \citep{Ahrens2004}.
558:
559:
560:
561:
562:
563: \enlargethispage*{1.0cm}
564:
565: \section*{Acknowledgements}
566:
567: We would like to thank the IAC for the excellent working
568: conditions at the Observatory de los Muchachos in La Palma. The
569: support of the German BMBF and MPG, the Italian INFN and the
570: Spanish CICYT is gratefully acknowledged. This work was also
571: supported by ETH Research Grant TH~34/04~3 and the Polish MNiI Grant 1P03D01028.
572:
573:
574:
575:
576:
577: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
578:
579: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2005a)]{Aharonian2005a}
580: Aharonian, F. et~al.,
581: \newblock Science 307 (2005a) 1938.
582:
583: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2005b)]{Aharonian2005b}
584: Aharonian, F. et~al.,
585: \newblock ApJ (2005b), in press, astro-ph/0510397.
586:
587: \bibitem[Ahrens et~al.(2004)]{Ahrens2004}
588: {Ahrens}, J. et~al.,
589: \newblock Astroparticle Physics 20 (2004) 507.
590:
591: \bibitem[Baixeras et~al.(2004)]{MAGIC-commissioning}
592: Baixeras, C. et~al.,
593: \newblock Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A518 (2004) 188.
594:
595: \bibitem[Bock et~al.(2004)]{RF}
596: Bock, R.~K. et~al.,
597: \newblock Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A516 (2004) 511.
598:
599: \bibitem[Bretz et~al.(2003)]{Bretz2003}
600: Bretz, T. et~al., (MAGIC Collab.),
601: \newblock Proc. of the 28th ICRC, Tsukuba, Japan, (2003) 2943.
602:
603: \bibitem[Brogan et~al.(2005)]{Brogan2005}
604: Brogan, C.~L. et~al.,
605: \newblock ApJ 629 (2005) L105.
606:
607: \bibitem[Brogan et~al.(2004)]{Brogan2004}
608: Brogan, C.~L. et~al.,
609: \newblock ApJ 127 (2004) 335.
610:
611: \bibitem[Camilo et.~al.(2002)]{Camilo2002}
612: Camilo, F. et~al.,
613: \newblock ApJ 579 (2002) L25.
614:
615: \bibitem[Churchwell(1990)]{Hess27}
616: Churchwell, E.,
617: \newblock AApR 2 (1990) 79.
618:
619: \bibitem[Cortina et~al.(2005)]{CortinaICRC}
620: Cortina, J. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
621: \newblock Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India , in press, astro-ph/0508274.
622:
623: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{Dickey_Lockman1990}
624: Dickey, J.~M. \& ~Lockman, F.~J.,
625: \newblock ARA\&A 28 (1990) 215.
626:
627: \bibitem[Fegan(1997)]{Fegan1997}
628: Fegan, D.~J.,
629: \newblock J Phys G 23 (1997) 1013.
630:
631: \bibitem[Fomin et~al.(1994)]{wobble}
632: Fomin, V.~P. et~al.,
633: \newblock Astroparticle Physics 2 (1994) 137.
634:
635: \bibitem[Gaug et~al.(2005)]{MAGIC_calibration}
636: Gaug, M. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
637: \newblock Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India , in press, astro-ph/0508274.
638:
639: \bibitem[Ginzburg \& Syrovatskii(1964)]{Ginzburg1964}
640: Ginzburg, V.~L. \& Syrovatskii, S.~I.,
641: \newblock The Origin of Cosmic Rays, New York: Macmillan, 1964.
642:
643: \bibitem[Helfand et~al.(2005)]{Helfand2005}
644: Helfand, D.~J., Becker,R.~H. and White, R.~L.,
645: \newblock (2005), astro-ph/0505392.
646:
647: \bibitem[Hillas(1985)]{Hillas_parameters}
648: Hillas, A.~M.,
649: \newblock Proceedings of the 19th ICRC, La Jolla 3 (1985) 445.
650:
651: \bibitem[Konopelko et~al.(1999)]{LZA-sensitivity}
652: Konopelko, A. et~al.,
653: \newblock J Phys G 25 (1999) 1989.
654:
655: \bibitem[Lessard et~al.(2001)]{Lessard2001}
656: Lessard, R.~W. et~al.,
657: \newblock Astroparticle Physics 15 (2001) 1.
658:
659: \bibitem[Li\&Ma(1983)]{Li_Ma1983}
660: Li, T.-P. \& Ma, Y.-Q,
661: \newblock ApJ, 272 (1983) 317.
662:
663: \bibitem[Manchester et~al.(2005)]{Manchester2005}
664: Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A. \& Hobbs, M.
665: \newblock AJ 129 (2005) 1993.
666:
667: \bibitem[Mizobuchi et~al.(2005)]{Mizobuchi2005}
668: Mizobuchi, S. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
669: \newblock Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India , in press, astro-ph/0508274.
670:
671: \bibitem[Riegel et~al.(2005)]{starguider}
672: Riegel, B. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
673: \newblock Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India , in press, astro-ph/0508274.
674:
675: \bibitem[Torres et~al.(2003)]{Torres2002}
676: Torres, D.~F. et~al.,
677: \newblock Phys. Rept. 382 (2003) 303, astro-ph/0209565.
678:
679: \bibitem[Ubertini et~al.(2005)]{Ubertini2005}
680: Ubertini, P. et~al.,
681: \newblock ApJ, 629 (2005) L109.
682:
683: \bibitem[Wagner et~al.(2005)]{Crab_MAGIC}
684: Wagner, R. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
685: \newblock Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India , in press, astro-ph/0508244.
686:
687: \end{thebibliography}
688:
689:
690:
691:
692:
693:
694: \end{document}
695:
696:
697: