1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3:
4: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5:
6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7:
8: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9:
10: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
11: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
12: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
13: %% for information.
14:
15: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
16: \newcommand{\myemail}{colbert@ipac.caltech.edu}
17:
18: \def\kms{km s${}^{-1}$}
19: \def\b{$\beta$}
20: \def\a{$\alpha$}
21: \def\d{$\delta$}
22: \def\m{$\mu$m}
23: \def\ab{$\sim$}
24: \def\p{$\pm$}
25: \def\lya{Ly$\alpha$}
26: \def\Lya{Ly$\alpha$ }
27: \def\et{et al. }
28: \def\ab{$\sim$}
29: \def\deg{\ifmmode ^{\circ}
30: \else $^{\circ}$\fi}
31:
32: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
33:
34: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
35:
36: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
37: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
38: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
39: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
40: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
41: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
42:
43: \shorttitle{}
44: \shortauthors{Colbert et al.}
45:
46: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
47: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
48: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
49:
50:
51:
52: \begin{document}
53:
54: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
55: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
56: %% you desire.
57:
58: \title{Ultraviolet-Bright, High-Redshift ULIRGS}
59:
60: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
61: %% author and affiliation information.
62: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
63: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
64: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
65: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
66:
67:
68: \author{James W. Colbert\altaffilmark{1}, Harry Teplitz\altaffilmark{1},
69: Paul Francis\altaffilmark{2}, Povilas Palunas\altaffilmark{3}, Gerard
70: M. Williger\altaffilmark{4,5}, Bruce Woodgate\altaffilmark{6}}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{1}{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology,
73: Pasadena, CA 91125}
74:
75: \altaffiltext{2}{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University,
76: Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia}
77:
78: \altaffiltext{3}{McDonald Observatory, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712}
79:
80: \altaffiltext{4}{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292}
81:
82: \altaffiltext{5}{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
83:
84: \altaffiltext{6}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87:
88: We present {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope observations of the $z$=2.38 \lya-emitter over-density
89: associated with galaxy cluster J2143-4423, the largest known structure (110 Mpc)
90: above $z=2$.
91: We imaged 22 of the 37 known \lya -emitters within the filament-like structure,
92: using the MIPS 24\m\ band. We detected 6 of the
93: \lya -emitters, including 3 of the 4 clouds of extended ($>$50kpc) \Lya emission, also known
94: as \Lya Blobs.
95: Conversion from rest-wavelength 7\m\ to total far-infrared luminosity
96: using locally derived correlations suggests all the detected sources are in the class of
97: ULIRGs, with some reaching Hyper-LIRG energies.
98: \Lya blobs frequently show evidence for interaction, either in {\it HST} imaging,
99: or the proximity of multiple MIPS sources within the \Lya cloud. This connection suggests
100: that interaction or even mergers may be related to the production of \Lya blobs. A connection
101: to mergers
102: does not in itself help explain the origin of the \Lya blobs, as most of the
103: suggested mechanisms for creating \Lya blobs (starbursts, AGN, cooling flows) could also
104: be associated with galaxy interactions.
105:
106: \end{abstract}
107:
108: \keywords{galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, infrared: galaxies}
109:
110: \section{Introduction}
111:
112: The 110 Mpc filament mapped out by 37 Ly$\alpha$-emitting objects around the $z$ = 2.38 galaxy
113: cluster J2143-4423 is the largest known structure above $z=2$ \citep{pal04},
114: comparable in size to some of the largest structures seen in the local Universe
115: \citep[i.e. the Great Wall,][]{gel89}. Initially identified from
116: narrow-band imaging tuned to \Lya \ at $z$=2.38, it has since been spectroscopically confirmed
117: \citep{fra04,frb04}.
118: In addition to its compact \lya -emitters, this high-redshift ``Filament'' is also home to
119: four extended \lya -emitting clouds, known more commonly as Lyman $\alpha$ blobs.
120:
121: The Ly$\alpha$ blob is a relatively new class of objects found among high-redshift galaxy
122: over-densities \citep{ste00,kee99,pal04}. While similar in extent ($\sim$100 kpc) and \Lya flux
123: (\ab 10$^{44}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) to high-redshift radio galaxies,
124: blobs are radio quiet and are therefore unlikely to arise from interaction with jets.
125: Current surveys have reported the discovery of roughly 10 of these giant \Lya blobs, but they
126: are not isolated high redshift oddities. \cite{mat04} have demonstrated that the blobs are
127: part of a continuous size distribution of resolved ($>$16 arcsec$^2$) \Lya emitters, with more
128: than 40 presently known.
129:
130: One of the standing mysteries of the blobs is the source of their energy, as the measured
131: ultraviolet flux from nearby galaxies is insufficient to produce the observed
132: \Lya fluxes.
133: One possibility is that the \Lya blobs are powered by supernova-driven superwinds
134: \citep{ohy04}, driving great plumes of gas into the surrounding ambient medium and producing
135: shocks. An obscured AGN is another model, with the exciting ultraviolet illumination escaping along different
136: lines of sight \citep[i.e.,][]{bas04}. Cooling flows
137: have also been suggested \citep{fard01,fra01}
138: as a possible power source.
139:
140: There is growing evidence that \Lya blobs mark regions of extreme infrared
141: luminosity. Submillimeter flux has been detected in two of the giant \Lya blobs,
142: SMM J221726+0013 \citep{chp01} and SMM J17142+5016 \citep{sma03}.
143: The submm source SMM J02399-0136 is also likely surrounded by a \Lya blob halo, as its
144: \Lya emission covered most of a 15$\arcsec$ slit \citep{ivi98}. Most recently,
145: \cite{gea05} has detected submm flux from four of the smaller ($<$ 55 square arcsec)
146: and less luminous ($<$ 2$\times$10$^{43}$ L$_{\odot }$) \Lya blobs from \cite{mat04}:
147: LAB5, LAB10, LAB14 \& LAB18.
148: Also, \cite{dey05} has discovered a single \Lya blob (SST24 J1434110+331733) in the NOAO Deep Wide-Field
149: Survey with strong 24\m\ flux (0.86 mJy).
150:
151: In this paper we discuss the {\it Spitzer} 24\m\ observations of these $z$=2.38 \lya -emitters, both
152: compact sources and blobs.
153: We estimate the total far-infrared luminosity for all detections and discuss
154: the possibility of a connection between mergers and \Lya blobs.
155: We assume an $\Omega _{M}$=0.3,
156: $\Omega _{\Lambda }$=0.7 universe with H$_o$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$.
157:
158: \section{Observations}
159:
160: Our data were obtained using Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer \citep[MIPS;][]{rie04}
161: in 24\m\ photometry mode. The field was observed on October 13 and 14 and November 4 and 5, 2004.
162: The primary observation was a 3$\times$5 raster map, covering approximately 15$\times$25
163: arcminutes of the filament structure, centered at 21$^h$42$^m$38.0$^s$, -44$\deg $26$\arcmin$30$\arcsec$.
164: The total integration time per pixel is 1818 seconds.
165: In addition we observed one small side field (5$\times$5 arcmin) with a
166: single known \lya -emitter (at 21$^h$42$^m$56.3$^s$, -44$\deg $37$\arcmin$57$\arcsec$) for 666 seconds.
167: The data were initially reduced by the standard {\it Spitzer}
168: pipeline \footnotemark .
169: We then produced sky frames for each data frame from the median of the 100 nearest
170: (in time) data frames.
171:
172: \footnotetext{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu}
173:
174: We assembled the final mosaic of the MIPS 24\m\ image using the MOPEX package available from the
175: {\it Spitzer} Science Center.
176: The final drizzled pixel scale is 1.23$\arcsec$ per pixel. For source extraction, we applied the
177: APEX source extraction package available within MOPEX. APEX requires an input Point Response Function
178: (PRF), which we created from the 40 brightest objects extracted from the final image.
179: Our final APEX source extraction detected 3010 objects down to
180: roughly 50 $\mu$Jy. The full dataset will be discussed in a future paper.
181:
182: The 5-$\sigma$ detection limit, as measured within a 7.5$\arcsec$ aperture, is 58 $\mu$Jy
183: over most of the image, but can be as high as 180 $\mu$Jy at the edges.
184: None of the \lya -emitters for which APEX failed to find MIPS sources had aperture fluxes greater
185: than these 3-$\sigma$ upper limits.
186: A list of all extracted MIPS sources associated with \lya -emitters is presented in Table 1.
187: A brief note on the naming conventions: The first three \lya -emitters were found by \cite{fra96}
188: and named B1, B2, \& B3. Further study by \cite{fra97} demonstrated that the B3 source was not real,
189: but they also found another source, which they labeled B4.
190: \cite{pal04} found 34 additional \lya -emitters in the field and so, rather than label each one,
191: only gave B\# designations to the three new \Lya blobs: B5, B6, \& B7.
192: We continue the B\# naming convention, adding sources B8 and B9.
193:
194:
195: \section{MIPS Detections of \Lya Sources}
196:
197: Six out of 22 ($\sim$30\%) of the Ly$\alpha$-emitters within the filament are
198: associated with MIPS 24\m\ sources (Figure 1), including three of the four resolved
199: ($>$50 kpc) Ly$\alpha$ blobs.
200: This blob association rate is much higher than that for unresolved
201: Ly$\alpha$-emitters (Only 3 of 18). We determined a MIPS source to be associated if it
202: lies within one MIPS FWHM (5.9$\arcsec$) of the position of the Ly$\alpha$-emitter.
203: In four cases the coordinates for the MIPS and \Lya \ sources agree to less
204: than an arcsecond, while the remaining two are separated by 2.7 (Blob B7) and 4.1$\arcsec$
205: (source B9).
206: We checked the MIPS field astrometry against that of the optical data by comparing object centroids
207: for all detected MIPS sources against those found in I-band. After correction for a 0.3$\arcsec$
208: offset, we found that the positions of the objects agree with a standard deviation of
209: 1.5$\arcsec$.
210:
211: The density of MIPS sources in the central portion of the field is \ab 4.5 arcmin$^{-2}$, making
212: the odds of a chance superposition of a random MIPS source $<$0.4\% for those within an arcsecond,
213: $<$ 2.9\% for within 2.7$\arcsec$, and $<$ 6.6\% for within 4.1$\arcsec$. However, all the
214: detected Ly$\alpha$-emitter counterparts have fluxes greater than 120 $\mu$Jy, well above the
215: detection limits and with a consequently lower surface density. Accounting for source brightness
216: decreases the probability of chance superposition below 0.3\% for all sources except for
217: source B9, which has a 3.3\% chance that its associated MIPS source
218: (4.1$\arcsec$ away) is mere coincidence.
219: For comparison, the \cite{dey05} MIPS source lies 2.5$\arcsec$
220: from the center of its associated \Lya blob.
221:
222: We do not detect 16 of the 22 Ly$\alpha$-emitters in the MIPS image. Six of these sources lie in
223: regions of higher noise, where the 5$\sigma$ detection limits range from 100-180 $\mu$Jy.
224: The remaining ten Ly$\alpha$-emitters are in the central regions of the image, with
225: detection limits of $<$60 $\mu$Jy. The lack of faint MIPS counterparts is unlikely to be a
226: result of error in object positions, as we examine a radius nearly 4 times the
227: typical 1$\sigma$ offset found from matching the MIPS and optical data.
228: The absence of detections between 60 and 120 $\mu$Jy indicates there
229: is not a rapid climb in numbers with decreasing 24\m\ flux for Ly$\alpha$-emitters over this range,
230: although the number of objects considered is small.
231:
232: Two of the Ly$\alpha$ blobs, B6 and B7, appear to have additional MIPS sources associated with
233: them. The B6 Ly$\alpha$ blob extends over 25$\arcsec$, or over 200 kpc at $z$=2.38, and
234: contains more than one knot or concentration. The brightest Ly$\alpha$ knot is the central one
235: and it is associated with a bright MIPS source, but the southern knot (not to be confused with
236: the large diffuse area to the southeast) also has a MIPS source of almost identical brightness.
237: There is also an area of more diffuse Ly$\alpha$ emission to the north which also appears to be
238: associated with a bright MIPS source. Each source is separted by approximately 9.5$\arcsec$ from
239: the central source, creating a potential triple system. The northern source should probably be
240: treated with some caution, as it not only lacks any clear Ly$\alpha$ concentration, but there
241: is also a relatively bright galaxy visible at that location in the B-band image (B=22.5), which is
242: unlikely to be at high redshift.
243:
244: The center of the B7 Ly$\alpha$ blob actually lies between two sources. We have associated
245: it with the brighter, closer MIPS source 2.7$\arcsec$ (\ab 20 kpc) to its southeast, but a second
246: source lies 5.9$\arcsec$ (\ab 45 kpc) to the northwest. While there is a \ab 10\% chance the second
247: object could be chance association, the location of the Ly$\alpha$ blob immediately between the
248: two MIPS sources suggests a possible physical connection.
249:
250: \section{Ultraviolet-Bright ULIRGs}
251:
252: The detected 24\m \ flux densities range from 0.1 to 0.6 mJy, which at $z$=2.38 corresponds to
253: roughly 2$\times 10^{11}$ to 10$^{12}$ L$_{\sun }$ in rest frame 7\m\ $\nu F\nu$. To convert from the
254: mid-infrared to total bolometric luminosity (L$_{bol}$), we use the relationship from
255: \cite{cha01}, hereafter CE01, calibrated by examining galaxies measured with both ISO and IRAS:
256:
257: \begin{equation}
258: L_{IR} = 4.37^{+2.35}_{-2.13} \times 10^{-6} \times L^{1.62}_{6.7\mu m}
259: \end{equation}
260:
261: In an effort to avoid over-estimation of L$_{IR}$, the mid-infrared conversion
262: used throughout this paper assumes the low end of the 1$\sigma$ envelope, producing total
263: luminosities roughly a factor of 2 lower than a direct application of the formula.
264: Even this conservative mid-IR conversion puts all the sources
265: in the class of ultra luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs; $> 10^{12} L_{\sun }$), with many
266: achieving Hyper-LIRG ($> 10^{13} L_{\sun }$) status (see Figure 2).
267: It should be noted, however, that the CE01 relation is based on nearby
268: starburst-dominated galaxies and it is possible it may not hold at high redshift or for the
269: most extreme starbursts, if their spectral energy distributions are significantly different.
270:
271: The L$_{bol}$ of most ULIRGs in the nearby universe comes from a combination of strong star
272: formation and AGN activity \citep[see][for review]{san96}.
273: The majority are dominated by the stellar component, seen both in the far-infrared to radio
274: relation \citep{yun01} and their strong PAH to continuum ratios \citep{lut98}. However,
275: this changes as the luminosity approaches that of the Hyper-LIRG (LIR$>$10$^{13}$ L$_{\odot }$); AGNs
276: typically dominate above \ab 10$^{12.5}$ L$_{\odot }$ \citep{tra01}.
277: It is presently unknown how this trend will continue out to higher redshifts, where high-mass
278: mergers, like those predicted to build giant ellipticals, could be producing energies on the scale
279: of a Hyper-LIRG through star formation \citep{dop05}. PAHs are already being found in high-redshift
280: infrared sources \citep{hou05,yan05}.
281: If these MIPS sources are AGN-dominated, one would expect $F_{\nu } \propto \nu ^{-1}$, which would
282: still place all the detected sources in the class of ULIRGs.
283:
284: If we combine the 24\m\ detections from this study and from \cite{dey05} with
285: the submm detections of \Lya blobs \citep{chp01,sma03,gea05},
286: there are now at least 10 known high redshift ULIRGs surrounded by \Lya halos.
287: We plot \Lya luminosity versus L$_{bol}$ for all the identified \Lya
288: blobs with infrared or submm detections in Figure 3. SMM J02399-0136 \citep{ivi98}
289: is excluded as its total \Lya flux is not precisely known.
290: We use the published L$_{bol}$ values for all submm sources, but derive
291: the total L$_{bol}$ for the \cite{dey05} 24\m\ source using
292: the CE01 relation to better compare with our results.
293:
294: Applying a similar analysis, \cite{gea05} found a weak \lya /IR relation for
295: submm-detected \Lya blobs with a typical L$_{Ly\alpha }$/L$_{bol}$ ratio just
296: under 0.1\%. Including our 24\m -detected \Lya blobs, which are brighter
297: in \Lya than most of the \cite{gea05} objects, we continue to see the same weak
298: trend, with a L$_{Ly\alpha }$/L$_{bol}$ efficiency of 0.05-0.2\%. Neither the detection of
299: X-rays (SMM J17142+5016 \& LAB18) nor CIV emission (B1, SMM J17142+5016, \&
300: SST24 J1434110+331733), both strong indicators of AGN activity, has any clear effect
301: on this trend.
302: There is one significant outlier, the B5 blob, which falls at least a factor of 30 away
303: from this proposed relation. While this relation is still tentative, it suggests
304: a direct causal connection between the ULIRG infrared luminosity and
305: the \Lya blobs.
306:
307: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccl}
308: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.05in}
309: \tablehead{
310: \colhead{RA} &
311: \colhead{Dec} &
312: \colhead{log L$_{Ly\alpha }$} &
313: \colhead{24\m\ F$_{\nu}$} &
314: \colhead{$\nu L_{\nu }$} &
315: \colhead{Total FIR} &
316: \colhead{Comment} \\
317: & & ergs s$^{-1}$ & $\mu$Jy & 10$^{10}$ L$_{\odot }$ & 10$^{10}$ L$_{\odot }$ &
318: }
319: \tablecaption{\Lya Sources}
320: \startdata
321: 21:42:27.59 & -44:20:29.7 & 43.9 & 236 & 33.4 & 1000 & Blob B1 \\
322: 21:42:32.16 & -44:20:18.5 & 43.0 & 562 & 79.5 & 4300 & B4 \\
323: 21:42:42.66 & -44:30:09.4 & 43.8 & 634 & 89.5 & 5200 & Blob B6 \\
324: 21:42:34.95 & -44:27:08.8 & 43.5 & 292 & 41.3 & 1500 & Blob B7; 2.7$\arcsec$ offset \\
325: 21:43:05.84 & -44:27:20.9 & 43.7 & 142 & 20.1 & 460 & B8 \\
326: 21:43:37.33 & -44:23:56.2 & 43.1 & 123 & 17.4 & 360 & B9; 4.1$\arcsec$ offset \\
327: 21:43:03.57 & -44:23:44.2 & 43.8 & $<$ 58 & $<$ 8 & $<$ 80 & Blob B5 \\
328: \hline
329: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Possible \Lya Blob Companions} \\
330: \hline
331: 21:42:42.79 & -44:30:18.2 & n/a & 535 & 76 & 3900 & 9.5$\arcsec$ from B6 \\
332: 21:42:42.49 & -44:29:59.8 & n/a & 340 & 48 & 1900 & 9.5$\arcsec$ from B6 \\
333: 21:42:34.68 & -44:27:01.2 & n/a & 172 & 24 & 620 & 5.9$\arcsec$ from B7
334: \enddata
335: \end{deluxetable}
336:
337: \section{\Lya Blob Merger Connection?}
338:
339: The high rate of MIPS detection for the \Lya blobs (3 out of 4) demonstrates that these ultraviolet sources
340: are locations of tremendous infrared energy. Two of the \Lya blobs (B6 \& B7) are associated
341: with multiple MIPS sources, suggesting possible interaction or even merger. These separations between
342: possible ULIRG component galaxies are large (60-70 kpc) compared to the typical
343: low-redshift ULIRG, which have a median separation \ab 2 kpc \citep{mur96}.
344: However, interacting ULIRGs with wide separations on the scale of 50 kpc
345: do exist \citep{kim02}, and seem to occur when at least one the interacting galaxies is highly
346: gas-rich \citep{din01}.
347:
348: Previous high resolution {\it HST} imaging also indicates a possible \Lya blob connection to
349: merging galaxies. For instance, NICMOS imaging of blob B1 shows a pair of compact, red galaxies
350: with a projected separation of less than 7 kpc \citep{fra01}.
351: Only three other \Lya blobs have been imaged with {\it HST}: the blobs in the
352: field of 53W002, one of which shows a second nearby galaxy \citep{kee99}, and
353: blob SSA22a-C11 \citep{ste00} which STIS imaging shows to be composed of several likely
354: interacting components \citep{cha04}. \cite{dey05} also find multiple components within their
355: blob, visible in their ground-based, optical imaging.
356:
357: In the local universe, the most energetic mergers are associated with the ULIRGs, with
358: roughly 90\% of ULIRGs clearly interacting \citep{bus02,far01}.
359: The majority of local ULIRG mergers are between two low mass (0.3-0.5 L$^*$) galaxies
360: \citep{col01}, but major mergers of high-mass galaxies, like those predicted to build giant
361: ellipticals, must be occurring at higher redshift \citep[i.e.,][]{con05}.
362: If merger-induced star formation is the source of the majority of the infrared flux in these objects, it
363: implies star formation rates of 1000s of M$_{\odot }$ yr$^{-1}$, like those suggested
364: for some sub-mm sources \citep{cha03,gea05}.
365: Such massive SFRs would be capable of generating the supernova kinetic energy needed to drive a superwind
366: and power the \Lya blobs. If supernovas deposit roughly 10$^{49}$ ergs per solar mass of stars
367: into the surrounding medium \citep[i.e.,][]{bow01}, a star formation rate of 1000 M$_{\odot }$ yr$^{-1}$
368: will easily match the \ab 10$^{51}$ ergs yr$^{_1}$ emitted by the blobs, even at a low efficency.
369:
370: Mergers could also help drive gas inwards into a supermassive black hole, making AGN another
371: viable infrared energy source, with escaping ultraviolet radiation driving the \Lya blobs.
372: \cite{dey05} found that their 24\m -detected blob is better fit by an AGN spectral energy distribution
373: than that of a star forming galaxy, but longer rest-wavelengths or a mid-IR spectrum are
374: required for a definitive determination. There is one clearly starbursting galaxy at the
375: northern end of their \Lya nebula.
376:
377: Cooling flows also remain a possibility, as it might be common to find multiple galaxies merging
378: at the center of such a large inward flow of gas. It does become a less favored model, however, as the energy
379: from the cooling gas in no longer required to power the \Lya blobs.
380: The ULIRGs would appear to have more than enough energy in their budget to do so on their own.
381:
382: This work is based on observations made with the {\it Spitzer}
383: Space Telescope, which is operated by the
384: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under NASA contract 1407.
385: We wish to acknowledge financial support from the {\it Spitzer} grant GO-3699.
386:
387: \begin{thebibliography}{}
388:
389: \bibitem[Basu-Zych \& Scharf(2004)]{bas04} Basu-Zych, A. \& Scharf, C. 2004, ApJL, 615, L85
390: \bibitem[Bower et al.(2001)]{bow01} Bower, R. G., Benson, A. J., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., \& Frenk, C. S. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 497
391: \bibitem[Bushouse et al.(2002)]{bus02} Bushouse, H. A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 138, 1
392: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2004)]{cha04} Chapman, S. C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 606, 85
393: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2003)]{cha03} Chapman, S. C., Windhorst, R., Odewahn, S., Yan, H., \& Conselice, C. 2003, ApJ, 599, 92
394: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2001)]{chp01} Chapman, S. C., Lewis, G., Scott, D., Richards, E., Borys, C., Steidel, C., Adelberger, K., \& Shapley, A. 2001, ApJ, 548, L17
395: \bibitem[Chary \& Elbaz(2001)]{cha01} Chary, R., \& Elbaz, D. 2001, ApJ, 556, 562
396: \bibitem[Colina et al.(2001)]{col01} Colina, L., et al. 2001, ApJ, 563, 546
397: \bibitem[Conselice(2005)]{con05} Conselice, C. J. 2005, ApJ, accepted, astro-ph/0405001
398: \bibitem[Dey et al.(2005)]{dey05} Dey, A., et al. 2005, ApJ, accepted, astro-ph/0503632
399: \bibitem[Dinh-V-Trung et al. (2001)]{din01} Dinh-V-Trung et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 141
400: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2005)]{dop05} Dopita, M. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 755
401: \bibitem[Fardal et al.(2001)]{fard01} Fardal, M. A., Katz, N., Gardner, J. P., Hernquist, L., Weinberg, D. H., \& Dav{\'e}, R. 2001, ApJ, 562, 605
402: \bibitem[Farrah et al.(2001)]{far01} Farrah, D., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1333
403: \bibitem[Francis et al.(2004)]{fra04} Francis, P. J., Palunas, P., Teplitz, H. I., Williger, G. M., \& Woodgate, B. E. 2004, ApJ, 614, 75
404: \bibitem[Francis \& Williger(2004)]{frb04} Francis, P. J., \& Williger, G. M.\ 2004, ApJL, 602, L77
405: \bibitem[Francis et al.(2001)]{fra01} Francis, P. J., et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1001
406: \bibitem[Francis et al.(1997)]{fra97} Francis, P. J., Woodgate, B., \& Danks, A. 1997, ApJL, 482, L25
407: \bibitem[Francis et al.(1996)]{fra96} Francis, P. J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 457, 490
408: \bibitem[Geach et al.(2005)]{gea05} Geach, J. E., et al. 2005, submitted to MNRAS, astro-ph/0508357
409: \bibitem[Geller \& Huchra(1989)]{gel89} Geller, M. J., \& Huchra, J. P. 1989, Science, 246, 897
410: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2005)]{hou05} Houck, J.~R., et al. 2005, ApJL, 622, L105
411: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(1998)]{ivi98} Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Le Borgne, J.-F., Blain, A., Kneib, J.-P., Bezecourt, J., Kerr, T., \& Davies, J. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 583
412: \bibitem[Keel et al.(1999)]{kee99} Keel, W. C., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 2547
413: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2002)]{kim02} Kim, D. -C., Veilleux, S., \& Sanders, D. B. 2002, ApJS, 143, 277
414: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(1998)]{lut98} Lutz, D., et al. 1998, ApJL, 505, L103
415: \bibitem[Matsuda et al.(2004)]{mat04} Matsuda, Y., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 569
416: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(1996)]{mur96} Murphy, T., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1025
417: \bibitem[Ohyama \& Taniguchi(2004)]{ohy04} Ohyama, Y. \& Taniguchi, Y. 2004, AJ, 127, 1313
418: \bibitem[Palunas et al.(2004)]{pal04} Palunas, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 602, 545
419: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04} Rieke, G. H., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 25
420: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel(1996)]{san96} Sanders, D. \& Mirabel, I. 1996, ARAA, 34, 749
421: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2003)]{sma03} Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Gilbank, D. G., Dunlop, J. S., Keel, W. C., Motohara, K., \& Stevens, J.A. 2003, ApJ, 583, 551
422: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2000)]{ste00} Steidel, C. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, 170
423: \bibitem[Tran et al.(2001)]{tra01} Tran, Q. D., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 527
424: \bibitem[Yan et al.(2005)]{yan05} Yan, L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 604
425: \bibitem[Yun, Reddy, \& Condon(2001)]{yun01} Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., \& Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803
426:
427: \end{thebibliography}
428:
429: \begin{figure}
430: \epsscale{1.0}
431: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
432: \caption{Left) Images of the 40$\arcsec$$\times$40$\arcsec$ field around the three MIPS-detected \Lya
433: blobs: B1, B6, \& B7. From left to right the images are CTIO B-band, CTIO continuum-subtracted \lya ,
434: and MIPS 24$\mu$m. East is upwards, north to the right. One arcsecond corresponds to 8kpc
435: at z=2.38. Right) Images of the 40$\arcsec$$\times$40$\arcsec$ field around the three MIPS-detected
436: non-extended \lya -emitters. Format is same as left.}
437: \end{figure}
438:
439:
440: \begin{figure}
441: \plotone{f2.eps}
442: \caption{Histogram of inferred total far-infrared luminosity for MIPS sources associated with $z$=2.38
443: \Lya\ sources. The three sources potentially associated with the \Lya blobs B6 and B7 are marked with
444: cross-hatching.}
445: \end{figure}
446:
447:
448: \begin{figure}
449: \plotone{f3.eps}
450: \caption{Log L$_{Ly\alpha }$ vs. log L$_{bol}$ for high-z \Lya blob ULIRGs. The
451: 24\m -detected blobs are the circles (This study) and the diamond \citep{dey05}, with
452: error bars based on the estimated reliability of the \cite{cha01} relation. The
453: submm detections are the triangles \citep{gea05}, squares \citep{sma03},
454: and asterisks \citep{chp01}. The upside-down triangle is the average of all non-detected Geach et al. blobs.
455: \Lya blobs with evidence for AGN activity (X-rays or CIV emission) are plotted as hollow symbols.
456: The dashed line marks where L$_{Ly\alpha }$/L$_{bol}$ = 0.001.}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459:
460: \end{document}
461:
462:
463:
464:
465: