1: % mn.tex Dec. 21, 2005
2: \documentstyle[useAMS,graphicx,longtable]{mn2e}
3:
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5:
6: \newcommand{\hMpc}{{\ifmmode{h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}}\else{$h^{-1}$Mpc}\fi}}
7: \newcommand{\hkpc}{{\ifmmode{h^{-1}{\rm kpc}}\else{$h^{-1}$kpc}\fi}}
8: \newcommand{\ApJ}{ApJ}
9: \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{(\arabic{enumi})}
10: \def\msun{$h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot}$}
11: \def\approxlt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}
12: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$<$}}}
13: \def\approxgt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}
14: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$>$}}}
15: \def\approxpropto{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}
16: \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\propto$}}}
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19:
20: \title{Eclipsing binaries in ASAS catalog}
21: \author[B. Paczy\'nski, D. Szczygiel, B. Pilecki, and G. Pojma\'nski]
22: {B. Paczy{\'n}ski$^{1}$\thanks{e-mail: bp@astro.princeton.edu}
23: and D. Szczygiel$^{2}$, B. Pilecki$^{2}$, G. Pojma\'nski$^{2}$
24: \thanks{e-mail: dszczyg, pilecki, gp@astrouw.edu.pl}\\
25: $^{1}$Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA\\
26: $^{2}$Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478, Poland}
27:
28: \date{Accepted --.
29: Received -- ;
30: in original form --}
31:
32: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}
33: \pubyear{2005}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \maketitle
38:
39: \label{firstpage}
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: ASAS is a long term project to monitor bright variable stars
43: over the whole sky. It has discovered 50,122 variables brighter than
44: ${\rm V < 14 }$ mag south of declination ${\rm + 28^{\circ}}$, and among them
45: 11,099 eclipsing binaries. We present a preliminary analysis
46: of 5,384 contact, 2,957 semi-detached, and 2,758 detached systems.
47: The statistics of the distribution provides a qualitative confirmation
48: of decades old idea of Flannery and Lucy that W UMa type binaries
49: evolve through a series of relaxation oscillations:
50: ASAS finds comparable number of contact and semidetached systems.
51:
52: The most surprising
53: result is a very small number of detached eclipsing binaries with
54: periods ${\rm P < 1 }$ day, the systems believed to be the progenitors
55: of W UMa stars. As many (perhaps all) contact binaries have companions,
56: there is a possibility that some were formed in a Kozai cycle, as
57: suggested by Eggleton and his associates.
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \begin{keywords}
61: stars: eclipsing -- stars: binary -- stars: evolution
62: \end{keywords}
63:
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65: \section{Introduction to ASAS}
66: \label{sect:intro1}
67: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
68:
69: ASAS - All Sky Automated Survey, is a long term project dedicated
70: to detection and monitoring variability of bright stars. This
71: paper presents the results of several years of observations
72: done at the Las Campanas Observatory with a single instrument:
73: a telescope with the aperture of 7 cm, the focal length of 20 cm,
74: done through a standard V-band filter and a
75: ${\rm 2K \times 2K }$ CCD camera with ${\rm 15 \mu }$ pixels
76: from Apogee (Pojma\'nski 1997, 1998,
77: 2000, 2002, 2003, Pojma\'nski and Maciejewski 2004, 2005,
78: Pojma\'nski, Pilecki and Szczygiel 2005). More information
79: about ASAS is provided on the WWW:
80:
81: \centerline{ http://www.astrouw.edu.pl/\~{}gp/asas/asas.html }
82: \centerline{ http://archive.princeton.edu/\~{}asas/ }
83:
84: %----------------------- Fig. 1 ---------------------------------------
85: \begin{figure*}
86: \vspace{-0.9\linewidth}
87: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1.ps}
88: \caption{
89: The distribution of 50,122 ASAS variables in the sky in Galactic
90: coordinates. The Milky Way is clearly seen, as well as the patches
91: of interstellar extinction. The equator is shown with a dashed line.
92: The distribution is limited to declination ${\rm < +28^{\circ}}$.
93: }
94: \end{figure*}
95: %----------------------- Fig. 1 ---------------------------------------
96:
97: The variable stars were discovered quasi - uniformly for declination
98: ${\rm < + 28^{\circ} }$, covering almost 3/4 of the full sky.
99: Fig. 1 shows the distribution of ASAS variables in the sky in the
100: Galactic coordinates. The Milky Way is clearly visible, together
101: with the dust lanes. The distribution of ASAS stars as a function of
102: V-mag is shown on Fig. 2 for all stars (17,000,000), all
103: variable stars (50,122), and all eclipsing binaries,
104: the latter divided into Eclipsing Contact binaries (EC, 5,384),
105: Eclipsing Semi Detached binaries (ESD, 2,957), and Eclipsing Detached
106: binaries (ED, 2758).
107: The statistics for stars with ${\rm 8 < V < 12 }$ mag appears to be
108: approximately complete, but the efficiency falls rapidly within
109: the range of ${\rm 12 < V < 14 }$ mag as the detection limit
110: is approached. Also, the statistics deteriorates for ${\rm 8 < V }$
111: because of saturation effects.
112:
113: %----------------------- Fig. 2 ---------------------------------------
114: \begin{figure}
115: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig2.ps}
116: \caption{
117: The distribution of ASAS stars as a function of V-band magnitude.
118: The total number of stars is about 17,000,000. The total number
119: of variable stars is 50,122. The total number of eclipsing
120: binaries is 5,384 for contact systems (EC), 2,957 for semi-detached
121: systems (ESD), and 2,758 for detached systems (ED). Notice, that
122: the efficiency of discovering variable stars declines for ${\rm V > 12 }$
123: because the detection limit is approached, and for ${\rm V < 8 }$ because
124: of saturation effects.
125: }
126: \end{figure}
127: %----------------------- Fig. 2 ---------------------------------------
128:
129: All stars were observed for about 5 years, with a small subset for 8 years.
130: Typical number of photometric measurements was several hundred. The
131: distribution of this number is shown in Fig. 3.
132: The total number of photometric measurements was 2,916,000.
133: As ASAS continues its operation the number of measurements will increase,
134: approximately 100 V-band photometric measurements per year per variable.
135: We intend to continue the project indefinitely, with
136: some upgrades. While only V-band results are reported here,
137: the I-band photometry was accumulated, and several years of data are
138: already stored on a RAID-5 disk system. However, it will take
139: another year to process I-band data, well over a Tera-byte. There
140: are more stars detectable in the I-band, so we expect that the number of
141: variables will more than double. We are also planning an expansion of
142: ASAS to the northern hemisphere, to fully cover the whole sky.
143:
144: %----------------------- Fig. 3 ---------------------------------------
145: \begin{figure}
146: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig3.ps}
147: \caption{
148: The histogram of the number of photometric measurements obtained
149: during 5 years of ASAS life. A small subset of data extends
150: back to 8 years.
151: }
152: \end{figure}
153: %----------------------- Fig. 3 ---------------------------------------
154:
155: The results presented in this paper are not final in any sense.
156: Please note, that all data are public domain. A different
157: classification of binaries can be readily done by whoever feels
158: like verifying and/or correcting our presentation.
159:
160: This is an observational paper, but section 2 gives
161: a short introduction to the main ideas about the structure and evolution
162: of contact binaries. Section 3 gives the information about ASAS data,
163: the classification scheme, and some examples of a diversity of
164: light curves. Section 4 provides simple statistics of ASAS binaries.
165: Finally, in section 5 we make a somewhat speculative discussion based on this
166: observational paper.
167:
168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
169: \section{Introduction to contact binaries}
170: \label{sect:intro2}
171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
172:
173: Contact binaries, also known as W UMa stars, are in a physical
174: contact, with continuously changing brightness because of large tidal
175: distortion of the two components.
176:
177: The first theoretical milestone in the understanding of contact
178: binaries was due to Lucy (1968a,b), who proposed that the two components
179: share common envelope with the same entropy, thereby
180: making the effective temperature almost constant over the surface of the
181: two stars. As contact binaries have the mass ratio distinctly
182: different from one, most nuclear energy is generated in the
183: more massive component and it is redistributed around the
184: whole surface through a moderately thick convective envelope.
185:
186: The second theoretical milestone was the recognition of the
187: consequences of the fact that the mass - radius relation for Zero
188: Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) stars is much steeper than for the
189: two Roche lobes. There can be no stable equilibrium between the
190: two stars with a common envelope.
191: The system evolves through a sequence of relaxation
192: oscillations, with the mass flowing from star A to B,
193: next from B to A, etc. (Flannery 1976, Lucy 1976, Robertson
194: and Eggleton 1977).
195: The cycle repeats on a thermal (Kelvin-Helmholtz) time scale.
196: According to thermal relaxation model the binary oscillates
197: between thermal contact, with the two eclipses of almost
198: equal depth, and a semidetached phase in which one eclipse
199: is much deeper than another.
200:
201: Hazlehurst (1970) suggested that nuclear evolution of the
202: primary component of a contact binary affects its structure.
203: Stepie\'n (2003, 2005)
204: suggested that the currently more massive primary was
205: originally the less massive of the two. The nuclear burning formed
206: a small helium core, the star expanded and transferred mass
207: to the original secondary. In analogy with Algol systems the currently
208: more massive component is the less evolved, while the present
209: secondary has a small helium core, and it is more advanced in
210: its nuclear evolution.
211:
212: It is interesting that there is a controversy about thermal relaxation
213: oscillations in W UMa systems. Some authors claim there are no such
214: oscillations (Webbink 2003), while others claim that such
215: oscillations exist (Quin 2003, Yakut and Eggleton 2005,
216: and references therein). ASAS statistics resolves this
217: controversy on purely observational grounds.
218:
219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
220: \section{ASAS data}
221: \label{sect:statistics}
222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
223:
224: Close binaries with a deep common envelope are in thermal contact
225: and they have eclipses of almost equal depth.
226: If the contact is shallow, or if there
227: is no physical contact, then the effective
228: temperatures of the two stars are different,
229: and the two eclipses have different depth.
230:
231: Theoretical models of relaxation oscillations indicate that
232: the radii of the two components change relatively little
233: throughout the cycle
234: (Flannery 1976, Lucy 1976, Robertson and Eggleton 1977, Yakut
235: and Eggleton 2005, and references therein).
236: With the geometry of the two stars almost unchanged, tidal
237: distortions due to geometry remain almost the same,
238: and the most profound difference in the light curve
239: is the relative depth of the two eclipses.
240:
241: %----------------------- Fig. 4 ---------------------------------------
242: \begin{figure}
243: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig4.ps}
244: \caption{
245: Classification of eclipsing binaries in the Fourier coefficients
246: plane ${\rm a_2 - a_4 }$. The three symbols refer to
247: contact (EC), semidetached (ESD), and detached (ED)
248: binaries, following Pojma\'nski (2002). Note: when the amplitude
249: of variability is very small the classification is very
250: uncertain, as in the upper right hand corner.
251: }
252: \end{figure}
253: %----------------------- Fig. 4 ---------------------------------------
254:
255: For the purpose
256: of this paper the classification of eclipsing binaries was done
257: by decomposing their light curves into Fourier coefficients:
258: ${\rm a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4 }$, following Ruci\'nski (1997a,b, 1998,
259: 2002) and Pojma\'nski (2002). The
260: classification is shown in Fig. 4 in the ${\rm a_2 - a_4 }$ plane,
261: with the EC, ESD, and ED binaries shown with different symbols:
262: ESD stars have smaller marks than EC and ED.
263: Some examples of bright binaries of EC, ESD, and ED type are
264: shown in Fig. 5. The parameters of these 15 binaries are listed
265: in Table 1. The type of an eclipsing binary, EC, ESD, or ED, is
266: indicated at the upper right corner of the light curve. The complete
267: version of Table 1, for all eclipsing binaries used in this paper,
268: and with all eight Fourier parameters, is in the file {\tt Fourier.E}
269: on the web page:
270:
271: \centerline{ http://www.astrouw.edu.pl/\~{}gp/asas/asas\_paper\_data.html }
272: \centerline{ http://archive.princeton.edu/\~{}asas/asas\_paper\_data.html }
273:
274: \noindent
275: where all the data on which this paper is based are available electronically.
276: These include all photomertic measurements in compressed files: ec.tgz
277: (49MB), esd.tgz (27MB), ed.tgz (27MB).
278:
279: %----------------------- Fig. 5 ---------------------------------------
280: \begin{figure*}
281: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
282: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
283: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
284: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5a.ps}}&
285: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5b.ps}}&
286: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5c.ps}}\\
287: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
288: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5d.ps}}&
289: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5e.ps}}&
290: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5f.ps}}\\
291: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
292: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5g.ps}}&
293: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5h.ps}}&
294: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5i.ps}}\\
295: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
296: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5j.ps}}&
297: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5k.ps}}&
298: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5l.ps}}\\
299: \vspace{-0.12\linewidth}
300: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5m.ps}}&
301: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5n.ps}}&
302: \resizebox{0.27\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig5o.ps}}\\
303: \vspace{0.08\linewidth}
304: \end{tabular}
305: \caption{
306: Examples of light curves of 9 contact (EC), 3 semi-detached (ESD)
307: and 3 detached binaries (ED) are shown. All these are ASAS discoveries, even
308: though all of them are very bright. Notice a distinct difference in
309: the light curve shapes between contact and a semi-detached binaries.
310: The first three rows are sorted by minimum depth difference, the fourth row
311: presents contact binaries with long end exceptionally long periods,
312: and the fifth with the distinct maximum height difference. See Table 1
313: for details.}
314: \end{figure*}
315: %----------------------- Fig. 5 ---------------------------------------
316:
317: Some investigators (e.g. P. Eggleton) strongly prefer classification
318: of close binaries into EW, EB, and EA types, on the grounds that photometry
319: alone cannot provide unique geometry. Our classification
320: into EC, ESD, and ED types should be considered preliminary, as we have
321: only single band photometry and no spectroscopic information for
322: thousands of our binaries.
323:
324: \begin{table}
325: \begin{scriptsize}
326: \caption{The most important Fourier parameters for light curves from Fig.
327: 5 are listed along with orbital periods. Each row is separated with a
328: horizontal line. The $a_{2}$ parameter can be easily
329: translated to the amplitude, $a_{1}$ and $a_{3}$
330: determine the difference between the two eclipses, and $b_{1}$
331: is related to the difference between the two maxima.
332: Full Table 1 is given electronically as file {\tt Fourier.E} on our web page.
333: \label{tabelka}}
334: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c} % 7 kolumn
335: ASAS ID & P$[days]$ & $a_{1}$ & $a_{2}$ & $a_{3}$ & $a_{4}$ & $b_{1}$ \\
336: \hline
337: % EC
338: 125340-5010.6 & 0.4047 & -0.003 & -0.158 & -0.003 & -0.028 & -0.003 \\
339: 111621-5427.2 & 0.4971 & -0.026 & -0.123 & -0.012 & -0.020 & -0.000 \\
340: 220425-0603.4 & 0.7273 & -0.062 & -0.139 & -0.034 & -0.027 & 0.021 \\
341: \hline
342: % ESD
343: 181437-1324.0 & 1.3992 & -0.001 & -0.110 & -0.004 & -0.054 & 0.004 \\
344: 125028-6039.8 & 2.0439 & -0.030 & -0.085 & -0.010 & -0.031 & -0.001 \\
345: 162959-4515.5 & 1.1376 & -0.068 & -0.155 & -0.032 & -0.049 & 0.001 \\
346: \hline
347: % ED
348: 072345-6500.6 & 3.1240 & -0.006 & -0.066 & -0.003 & -0.060 & -0.001 \\
349: 185503-3359.5 & 1.1678 & -0.019 & -0.070 & -0.015 & -0.060 & 0.002 \\
350: 175924-0954.7 & 2.3438 & -0.115 & -0.119 & -0.090 & -0.088 & 0.006 \\
351: \hline
352: % EClong
353: 123140-6237.3 & 1.9307 & -0.009 & -0.184 & -0.004 & -0.051 & 0.001 \\
354: 172116-3759.2 & 5.2056 & -0.021 & -0.135 & -0.005 & -0.033 & 0.007 \\
355: 012917-7243.4 & 180.60 & -0.050 & -0.190 & 0.016 & -0.052 & 0.041 \\
356: \hline
357: % Easym
358: 051700-5555.4 & 0.7904 & -0.059 & -0.126 & -0.028 & -0.021 & 0.020 \\
359: 105554-4349.6 & 1.1541 & -0.034 & -0.185 & -0.019 & -0.030 & 0.037 \\
360: 132831-4107.9 & 16.515 & -0.010 & -0.069 & -0.011 & 0.003 & -0.015 \\
361: \hline
362: \end{tabular}
363: \end{scriptsize}
364: \end{table}
365:
366: A sample of the catalog of ASAS eclipsing binaries is shown in Table 2.
367: The full table has the information for all 11,099 binaries, and can be found
368: on our web page, in the file {\tt Vars.E}.
369:
370: \begin{table*}
371: \begin{scriptsize}
372: \begin{minipage}{0.88\linewidth}
373: \caption{A sample of the catalog of ASAS eclipsing binaries is presented
374: here. Each star has its own ASAS designation (ID), equatorial
375: coordinates (RA and DEC), orbital period, epoch of minimum light (T0), and
376: ASAS classification. Additional information of other designation and
377: classification is also given, when available. Full Table 2 is
378: available electronically as the file {\tt Vars.E} in our web page.
379: \label{tabelka}}
380: \end{minipage}
381:
382: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|r@{.}l|c|c|c|c|c|c} % 10 kolumn
383: ID & RA & DEC & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Period} & T0 & V & Amp & Class & Other & Other \\
384: - & (2000) & (2000) & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$[days]$} & 2450000+ & $[mag]$ & $[mag]$ & - & ID & Class \\
385: \hline
386: % EC
387: 065819+1028.4 & 06:58:19 & +10:28:24 & 0&447763 & 2387.63 & 11.04 & 0.28
388: & EC & & \\
389: 070017+0202.2 & 07:00:17 & +02:02:12 & 1&397550 & 1873.07 & 10.53 & 0.57
390: & EC & V0460~Mon & EB/KE \\
391: 211201$-$2003.2 & 21:12:01 & $-$20:03:12 & 0&352202 & 1872.84 & 13.22 & 0.34
392: & EC/ESD & & \\
393: % ESD
394: 025535$-$0219.9 & 02:55:35 & $-$02:19:54 & 0&79274 & 1920.00 & 11.59 & 0.54
395: & ESD & & \\
396: 095930$-$6440.1 & 09:59:30 & $-$64:40:06 & 2&2428 & 1869.42 & 11.48 & 1.12 &
397: ESD & & \\
398: 202110$-$4333.9 & 20:21:10 & $-$43:33:54 & 1&00218 & \ 1876.053 & 12.08 & 0.71
399: & ESD/ED & V2265~Sgr & EA \\
400: % ED
401: 001855$-$7954.9 & 00:18:55 & $-$79:54:54 & 0&90310 & 1870.45 & 11.28 & 0.77
402: & ED & & \\
403: 114500$-$7247.6 & 11:45:00 & $-$72:47:36 & 22&23037 & 1895.60 & 11.15 & 0.09
404: & ED & & \\
405: 235052$-$2316.7 & 23:50:52 & $-$23:16:42 & 1&4023 & 1871.06 & \ 9.42 & 0.29 &
406: ED & & \\
407: \hline
408: \end{tabular}
409: \end{scriptsize}
410: \end{table*}
411:
412: A subset of all ASAS results
413: related to binary stars was `frozen' for the epoch of this paper.
414: ASAS is an on-going project, with more data added every clear
415: night. Therefore, as time goes on, the volume of data related to
416: eclipsing binaries will increase, and the quality will improve.
417: To make the results presented in this paper reproducible we decided to
418: provide `frozen' data.
419:
420: Note: all light curves presented in Fig. 5 are for bright variables
421: discovered with ASAS survey. They were not known before.
422: Just as expected, the majority of ASAS variables are new
423: discoveries (Paczy\'nski 1997).
424:
425:
426:
427: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
428: \section{Statistics of contact binaries}
429: \label{sect:statistics}
430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
431:
432: All the statistics of this section is based on data provided in the file
433: {\tt Vars.E}, which can be found on our web page. Table 2 is a sample of this file.
434: In particular, the classification of ASAS binaries is given there.
435:
436: The Galactic distribution of ASAS eclipsing binaries shows
437: a significant difference, with detached binaries most strongly
438: concentrated to the galactic plane, while the short period contact
439: binaries have almost isotropic distribution. It is well known
440: that there is a period - luminosity relation for W UMa stars
441: (Rucinski 1996, Klagyivik and Csizmadia 2004), and the Galactic
442: distribution of those stars is not surprising. The strong concentration
443: of detached binaries to the Galactic plane implies these
444: are even more luminous and massive, on average.
445:
446: The binary period distribution
447: is shown in Fig. 6 for stars with the Galactic latitude
448: ${\rm |b| > 30^{\circ}}$ to reduce the luminosity bias.
449: The distribution of contact systems (EC) peaks near 0.37 days, it has
450: a sharp cut-off at 0.2 days, and a long tail extending beyond 1 day.
451: In fact the tail extends to more than one hundred days, as it is
452: apparent in Fig. 8 and Fig. 10. Also shown is the distribution of orbital
453: periods of semi - detached (ESD) and detached (ED) binaries.
454:
455: %----------------------- Fig. 6 ---------------------------------------
456: \begin{figure}
457: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig6.ps}
458: \caption{
459: The distribution of periods of ASAS contact binaries (EC) at high Galactic
460: latitude ${\rm |b| > 30^{\circ} }$ is plotted.
461: The distribution peaks near 0.37 days,
462: it has a sharp cut-off at 0.2 days, and a tail extending far beyond 1 day.
463: Also shown is the distribution of orbital
464: periods of semi - detached (ESD) and detached (ED) binaries.
465: Contact binaries outnumber other binaries for binary periods
466: shorter than 1 day.
467: }
468: \end{figure}
469: %----------------------- Fig. 6 ---------------------------------------
470:
471: The important topic ot this paper is the presentation of eclipse
472: depth of EC binaries, as this is directly related to the issue
473: of relaxation oscillations. For contact binaries the
474: depth of both eclipses is directly related to the Fourier
475: coefficients of the light curve. The following
476: analytical formulae approximate these relations with better then $5\%$
477: accuracy for the majority of stars:
478: $$
479: {\rm D_{p} = -2 \left( 1.2a_{2} - 2a_{2}^2 + (a_{1}+a_{3}) \right) \hskip 1.0cm [mag] } ,
480: \eqno(1)
481: $$
482: $$
483: {\rm D_{s} = -2 \left( 1.2a_{2} - 2a_{2}^2 - (a_{1}+a_{3}) \right) \hskip 1.0cm [mag] } ,
484: \eqno(2)
485: $$
486: where ${\rm D_p }$ and ${\rm D_s }$ correspond to the depth of
487: the primary and secondary minimum, respectively. Three examples
488: are presented in Fig. 7.
489:
490:
491: %----------------------- Fig. 7 ---------------------------------------
492: \begin{figure}
493: \vspace{-3cm}
494: \begin{tabular}{c}
495: \vspace{-3.3cm}
496: \resizebox{0.8\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig7a.ps}}\\
497: \vspace{-3.3cm}
498: \resizebox{0.8\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig7b.ps}}\\
499: \resizebox{0.8\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig7c.ps}}\\
500: \end{tabular}
501: \caption{The first row of EC stars from Fig. 5 is shown. Vertical lines
502: represent depth of a primary ($D_p$) and a secondary ($D_s$) eclipse
503: calculated with equations (1) and (2), respectively. Flat bottom eclipses
504: may result in a significant error, which is somewhat reduced
505: in the $ {\rm {D_s} / {D_p} }$ ratio. }
506: \end{figure}
507: %----------------------- Fig. 7 ---------------------------------------
508:
509: %----------------------- Fig. 8 ---------------------------------------
510: \begin{figure}
511: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig8.ps}
512: \caption{
513: The distribution of primary eclipse depth as a function of orbital
514: period for contact binaries. ${\rm D_p }$ is the fraction of light
515: obscured in the primary eclipse.
516: }
517: \end{figure}
518: %----------------------- Fig. 8 ---------------------------------------
519:
520: The distribution of primary eclipse depth
521: with binary period is shown in Fig. 8.
522: A histogram of primary eclipse depth integrated over binary period
523: is shown in Fig. 9. Note that while the vast majority of W UMa
524: binaries have periods in the range ${\rm 0.2 < P < 1.2 }$ days,
525: there are contact binaries with periods over 100 days, as it is
526: apparent in Fig. 5 and Fig. 8.
527:
528: %----------------------- Fig. 9 ---------------------------------------
529: \begin{figure}
530: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig9.ps}
531: \caption{
532: The distribution of primary eclipse depth integrated over all periods.
533: }
534: \end{figure}
535: %----------------------- Fig. 9 ---------------------------------------
536:
537: The eclipse depth ratio is shown in Fig. 10 for EC binaries, and in Fig. 11
538: for EC and ESD binaries. These are important figures. They demonstrate
539: that some EC binaries are in good thermal contact, as
540: the depth of secondary eclipse is almost the same as the primary.
541: But many other EC binaries have the two eclipses which are very unequal,
542: implying that they are not in thermal contact, yet their geometry
543: is close to that expected for a contact system. Finally, there
544: are ESD binaries, in which the geometry is very different, and
545: of course the two eclipses have usually different depth.
546: Qualitatively, this is
547: just what was expected in the models with relaxation oscillations
548: (cf. Lucy 1976, Flannery 1976, Robertson and Eggleton 1977, Yakut
549: and Eggleton 2005). There is no shortage of stars without
550: thermal contact. Combining ASAS data with models of relaxation
551: oscillations should provide quantitative verification of the theory,
552: but this task is beyond the scope of our paper.
553:
554: %----------------------- Fig. 10 ---------------------------------------
555: \begin{figure}
556: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig10.ps}
557: \caption{
558: The ratio of eclipse depth is shown for contact binaries as a function
559: of their period. Stars in thermal contact have the eclipse
560: depth ratio close to one.
561: }
562: \end{figure}
563: %----------------------- Fig. 10 ---------------------------------------
564:
565: %----------------------- Fig. 11 ---------------------------------------
566: \begin{figure}
567: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig11.ps}
568: \caption{
569: The ratio of the eclipse depths, integrated over binary periods,
570: is shown for contact (EC) and semi-detached (ESD) systems.
571: Stars in a thermal contact have the eclipse
572: depth ratio close to one. Note the step in the histogram
573: at ${\rm D_s/D_p \approx 0.7 }$ The same feature is also
574: apparent in Fig. 10 at ${\rm \log P \approx -0.4 }$.
575: }
576: \end{figure}
577: %----------------------- Fig. 11 ---------------------------------------
578:
579: Contact binaries often have maxima of different
580: height, with the maximum following the primary (i.e. deeper)
581: eclipse being either higher or lower than the maximum following
582: the secondary eclipse. The distribution of the difference
583: is shown in Fig. 12.
584: The positive value of the ${\rm b1/|a2| } $
585: parameter indicates that the maximum following the primary eclipse is
586: brighter of the two. The asymmetry in distribution, i.e.
587: the excess of positive values of ${\rm b1/|a2| }$,
588: is known as the O'Connell (1951)
589: effect (cf. also Ruci\'nski 1997b): the maximum following
590: the primary eclipse is on average brighter, presumably due
591: to stream of gas flowing between the two stars. An extreme
592: case of this phenomenon is shown in V361 Lyr (Kaluzny 1991).
593:
594: %----------------------- Fig. 12 ---------------------------------------
595: \begin{figure}
596: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig12.ps}
597: \caption{
598: The distribution of light curve asymmetry of contact binaries is
599: shown - this is known as O'Connell (1951) effect.
600: Most stars have their light maxima of approximately equal height, but
601: there is an asymmetry in the distribution: the maxima that follow
602: the primary minimum are on average higher than the maxima
603: preceding the primary eclipse. The O'Connell effect is
604: likely a consequence of gas streams in these binaries.
605: }
606: \end{figure}
607: %----------------------- Fig. 12 ---------------------------------------
608:
609: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
610: \section{Discussion}
611: \label{sect:discuss}
612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
613:
614: Our conclusion, based on the distribution of eclipse depths
615: (Fig. 10, 11), is that
616: relaxation oscillations, first proposed by Lucy and
617: Flannery, are real. There is no shortage
618: of binaries corresponding to no thermal contact,
619: with a very different depth of the two eclipses. Model calculations of
620: the type recently done by Yakut and Eggleton (2005), when
621: combined with ASAS data, should allow a quantitative verification
622: of the theory.
623:
624: A very large number of contact or near contact systems
625: reveal features never noticed before:
626: the distribution of eclipse depth ratios as shown in Fig. 10
627: and Fig. 11 has a distinct break around ${\rm log P \approx -0.4 }$
628: and ${\rm D_s/D_p \approx 0.7 }$. We do not speculate on the
629: origin of this feature, but we bring this break
630: to the attention of our readers. This break is
631: best seen in systems with the most robust classification.
632:
633: The most surprising result of this paper is presented in Fig. 6.
634: A traditional view for the origin of W UMa contact binaries
635: is to assume that they come from detached binaries of comparable
636: periods. For the first time we have approximately complete
637: statistics of binaries of all types with orbital periods
638: shorter than one day, and there are very few detached binaries.
639: Obviously, they are more difficult to find than
640: either contact or semi - detached systems.
641: As times goes on the statistics of ASAS detached binaries
642: will improve, and a statistical analysis will tell us if
643: there is a problem with the origin of W UMa stars.
644: At this time the contact systems seem to appear "out of nowhere".
645:
646: In about a year we shall have I-band data for our eclipsing binaries.
647: This will make it possible to be more quantitative about the
648: distribution properties, including the distribution in our Galaxy.
649: Also, it will be much easier to quantify the impression about
650: a shortage of detached binaries and the space density of systems
651: of different types: EC, ESD, and ED. At this time it is premature for us
652: to speculate about the outcome of binary statistics while we wait
653: for the I-band data.
654:
655: While this is an observational paper, written to promote the usefulness
656: of the ASAS catalog of variable stars, we are tempted to speculate about
657: possible interpretation of Fig. 6, which was so surprising to us.
658: We are not consistent with the previous paragraph, but the temptation
659: is hard to resist. The following is a speculative hypothesis.
660:
661: There has been a gradual emergence of the notion that contact
662: systems have companions (Ruci\'nski and Kaluzny 1982, Chambliss 1992,
663: Hendry and Mochnacki 1998, also Tokovinin 2004).
664: Recently. Pribulla and Ruci\'nski (2005) found that up to 50\% of W UMa
665: binaries have companions.
666: This opens up a possibility that Kozai (1962) cycle operates
667: in some such triples, as suggested by Kiseleva, Eggleton,
668: and Mikkola (1998), and by Eggleton and Kiseleva-Eggleton (2001).
669: The mechanical three-body orbital evolution,
670: with a large range of inclinations of the two orbits, inner and
671: outer, may induce large variations in the eccentricity of
672: the inner binary. In time the eccentricity may become large
673: enough to make a contact system out of the inner binary.
674:
675: In this scenario the inner binary has the initial period that is
676: relatively long, and in most cases no eclipses would be detectable.
677: During a Kozai cycle the inner binary occasionally has a chance
678: to reach a physical contact: it may either merge forming
679: a single star, or it may become a W UMa star. This process
680: is somewhat similar to the model of formation of close
681: binaries in globular clusters (Pooley et al. 2003, and references therein).
682:
683: The surprisingly small number of short period detached
684: eclipsing binaries as seen in Fig. 6 may indicate that
685: the Kozai cycle is not just a curiosity, but it may be
686: an important channel for forming W UMa stars.
687: This possibility cannot
688: be rejected without careful analysis. After all W UMa
689: stars are rare, with the local space density of just 0.2\%
690: of the main sequence stars (Rucinski 2002, and references therein).
691:
692: \section*{Acknowledgements}
693:
694: We are very grateful to P. P. Eggleton, D. Fabrycky, S. Ruci\'nski and
695: K. Stepie\'n for many helpful discussions.
696:
697: The ASAS project was supported to a large extent by the generous
698: donation of William Golden.
699: This work was partially supported by the Polish MNiI grant
700: no. 1P03D-008-27.
701: %--------------------------------------------
702: \begin{thebibliography}{}
703:
704: \bibitem[()]{C2}
705: Chambliss, C. R. 1992, PASP, 104, 663
706:
707: \bibitem[()]{E01}
708: Eggleton, P. P., Kiseleva, L. 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012
709:
710: \bibitem[()]{Flan76}
711: Flannery, B. P. 1976, ApJ, 205, 217 % relaxation oscillations
712:
713: \bibitem[()]{Haz70}
714: Hazlehurst, J. 1970, MNRAS, 149, 129
715:
716: \bibitem[()]{HM98}
717: Hendry, P. D., Mochnacki, S. W. 1998, ApJ, 504, 978
718:
719: \bibitem[()]{K91}
720: Kaluzny, J. 1991, AcA, 41, 17 % V361 Lyr
721:
722: \bibitem[()]{Kla04}
723: Klagyivik, P., and Csizmadia, Sz. 2004, PADEU, 14, 303
724:
725: \bibitem[()]{Ki98}
726: Kiseleva, L. G., Eggleton, P. P., Mikkola, 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292
727:
728: \bibitem[()]{Ko}
729: Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 579
730:
731: \bibitem[()]{Lucy68a}
732: Lucy, L. B. 1968a, ApJ, 151, 1123 % structure of contact binaries
733:
734: \bibitem[()]{Lucy68b}
735: Lucy, L. B. 1968b, ApJ, 153, 877 % light curves of contact binaries
736:
737: \bibitem[()]{Lucy76}
738: Lucy, L. B. 1976, ApJ, 205, 208 % relaxation oscillations
739:
740: \bibitem[()]{O51}
741: O'Connell, D. J. K. 1951, Riverview Pub. 2, 85
742:
743: \bibitem[()]{P97}
744: Paczy\'nski, B. 1997, vsar.conf, 357
745:
746: \bibitem[()]{Poj97}
747: Pojma\'nski, G. 1997, AcA, 47, 467
748:
749: \bibitem[()]{Poj98}
750: Pojma\'nski, G. 1998, AcA, 48, 35
751:
752: \bibitem[()]{Poj00}
753: Pojma\'nski, G. 2000, AcA, 50, 177
754:
755: \bibitem[()]{Poj02}
756: Pojma\'nski, G. 2002, AcA, 52, 397
757:
758: \bibitem[()]{Poj03}
759: Pojma\'nski, G. 2003, AcA, 53, 341
760:
761: \bibitem[()]{Poj04}
762: Pojma\'nski, G., and Maciejewski, G. 2004, AcA, 54, 153
763:
764: \bibitem[()]{Poj05}
765: Pojma\'nski, G., and Maciejewski, G. 2005, AcA, 55, 97
766:
767: \bibitem[()]{PPS05}
768: Pojma\'nski, G., Pilecki, B., Szczygiel, D. 2005, astro-ph/050817
769:
770: \bibitem[()]{PPS05}
771: Pooley, D. et al. 2003, ApJL, 591, L131
772:
773: \bibitem[()]{PR05}
774: Pribulla, T., Rucinski, S. M. 2005, private communication
775:
776: \bibitem[()]{Q03}
777: Quin, S. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1260
778:
779: \bibitem[()]{Rob77}
780: Robertson, J. A., and Eggleton, P. P. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 359
781:
782: \bibitem[()]{Ruc96}
783: Rucinski, S. M. 1996, ASPC, 90, 270
784:
785: \bibitem[()]{Ruc97a}
786: Rucinski, S. M. 1997a, AJ, 113, 407
787:
788: \bibitem[()]{Ruc97b}
789: Rucinski, S. M. 1997b, AJ, 113, 1112
790:
791: \bibitem[()]{Ruc98}
792: Rucinski, S. M. 1998, AJ, 115, 1135
793:
794: \bibitem[()]{Ruc02}
795: Rucinski, S. 2002, PASP, 114, 1124
796:
797: \bibitem[()]{RK08}
798: Rucinski, S. M., Kaluzny, J. 1982, Ap\&SS, 88, 433
799:
800: \bibitem[()]{Ste03}
801: Stepie\'n, K. 2003, IAUS 219, 134 % Algol type evolution
802:
803: \bibitem[()]{Ste05}
804: Stepie\'n, K. 2005, astro-ph/0510464, submitted to A\&A % Algol type evolution
805:
806: \bibitem[()]{To05}
807: Tokovinin, A. 2004, RMxAC, 21, 7
808:
809: \bibitem[()]{Web03}
810: Webbink, R. F. 2003, ASPC, 293, 76
811:
812: \bibitem[()]{Y05}
813: Yakut, K., Eggleton, P. P. 2005, ApJ, 629, 1055
814:
815: \end{thebibliography}
816:
817: \bsp
818: \label{lastpage}
819:
820: \end{document}
821: