1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: % Began 10/31/05 at 0820
3: %First draft finished 11/3/05
4: %Comments by Andre and Geroges added 11/4/05
5: %HST stuff added 11/4/05
6: %Deidre comments 11/5 0900
7: %Submitted to ApJ Letters...
8: %Resubmitted 11/30/05, no changes
9: %Modified (added figure, shortened text); resubmitted Tuesday After Lunch (Dec 13, 2005)
10: %Made final modification (M31's metallicity reference) Jan 5, 2005
11:
12: \shorttitle{P Cygni Analog in M31}
13: \shortauthors{Massey}
14: %slugcomment{V3.0 Jan 5, 2005}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{The Discovery of a P Cygni Analog in M31\altaffilmark{1}}
19:
20: \author{Philip Massey\altaffilmark{2}}
21:
22:
23: \affil{Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001}
24: \email{Phil.Massey@lowell.edu}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Based in part on observations made with the NASA/ESA
27: Hubble Space Telescope, obtained from the Data Archive
28: at the Space Telescope Science
29: Institute, which is operated by the Association for Universities for
30: Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.}
31: \altaffiltext{2} {Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Optical
32: Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement
33: with the National Science Foundation (NSF).}
34:
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: We present spectroscopy and discuss the photometric history of a previously obscure
39: star in M31. The spectrum of the star is an extremely close match to that of P~Cygni, one of
40: the archetypes of Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs).
41: The star has not shown much variability over the past 40 years ($<0.2$~mag), although
42: small-scale (0.05~mag) variations over a year appear to be real.
43: Nevertheless, the presence of a sub-arcsecond extension around the star is
44: indicative of a past outburst, and from the nebula's size (0.5~pc diameter) we estimate the
45: outburst took place
46: roughly 2000 yrs ago. P Cygni itself exhibits a similar photometric behavior, and has
47: a similar nebula (0.2~pc diameter). We argue that this may be more typical behavior
48: for LBVs than commonly assumed. The star's location in the HR diagram
49: offers substantial support for stellar evolutionary models that include the effects
50: of rotation, as the star is just at a juncture in the evolutionary track of
51: a 85$M_\odot$ star. The star is likely
52: in a transition from an O star to a late-type WN Wolf-Rayet.
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \keywords{stars: early-type---stars: evolution--stars: mass loss---supergiants}
56:
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59: \label{Sec-intro}
60:
61: Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) are a rare class of luminous stars which
62: undergo episodic mass-loss, and probably represent a transition between
63: the most massive O stars and the red supergiant and/or Wolf-Rayet stage.
64: (See the recent conference proceedings edited by Davidson et al.\ 1988,
65: Nota \& Lamers 1997, and de Groot \& Sterken 2001.)
66: All of the ``accepted" LBVs were discovered
67: on the basis photometric and/or spectroscopic variability, but the number of
68: LBV ``candidates" (based upon spectroscopic similarities to known LBVs)
69: exceeds this number (Parker 1997). Understanding the number of bona-fide
70: LBVs relative to that of other evolved massive stars (Wolf-Rayets,
71: red supergiants) in nearby
72: galaxies (i.e., at differing metallicities) provides a crucial
73: test of the success of modern stellar evolutionary theory (Maeder \& Meynet
74: 2000). Massey (2002) has argued that if the archetypal LBVs P~Cygni or $\eta$ Carina
75: were located in M~31 or M~33 we would not know of them today, since their spectacular
76: photometric outbursts were hundreds of years ago.
77:
78: In this {\it Letter} we report the discovery of a star in M31 whose spectrum is uniquely
79: similar to that of P Cygni itself. A comparison of the star's location with stellar
80: evolutionary tracks provides a strong substantiation of the latest generation of stellar
81: models that include the effects of rotation (Meynet \& Maeder 2005),
82: while also offering a caution in interpreting evolutionary stages of these hydrostatic
83: models. The star has been relatively photometrically stable for the past 40 years,
84: yet it shows compelling evidence of an outburst 2 millennia ago. This provides
85: further support for the argument large photometric variations on the time-scale of
86: decades may be more a selection effect than a consequence of the physics of LBVs.
87:
88: \section{The Discovery}
89:
90: The Local Group Galaxies Survey (LGGS) project has obtained
91: images of M31 with the Kitt Peak 4-m telescope.
92: The LGGS has now completed the photometric calibrations and photometry
93: for M31 ($>$350,000 stars), and is preparing the paper for publication.
94: A subset of several dozen
95: bright, blue stars were selected for spectroscopy with the WIYN\footnote{The WIYN Observatory is a joint facility of the University
96: of Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, Yale University, and NOAO.} 3.5-m telescope and Hydra multi-object fiber positioner.
97: The selection criteria included $V<18$, $B-V<0.5$, and the reddening free index $Q=(U-B)-0.72(B-V)<-0.6$ in order to eliminate foreground dwarfs. The spectra were obtained using a 790 l mm$^{-1}$
98: grating (KPC-18C) in second order, with a BG-39 blocking filter to filter out first order red light.
99: The observations covered 3970\AA\ to 5030\AA. The ``blue" fiber bundle was used for these
100: observations; each fiber is 3.1" in diameter. The detector was a Tektronix 2048 x 2048 device
101: (``T2KA") with 24$\mu$m pixels. The resulting spectral resolution was 1.5\AA.
102: Our exposure of the northern field (in which our object was found) consisted of six 30m integrations
103: (i.e., 3 hrs). The field was reconfigured halfway through the sequence in order to update the
104: apparent position changes due to refraction. The observation was made on (UT) 2005 September 29.
105:
106: In reducing the data that night we were immediately struck by the similarity of one of the stars to
107: the well-known Galactic star P Cygni. The following night we obtained a 10 s exposure
108: of P Cygni
109: itself with the same setup to confirm our memory. We give the comparison in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}.
110:
111: The degree of similarity to P~Cygni is nearly unique.
112: While the term ``P Cygni profile" (blue-shifted absorption with an emission component extending redwards from line center) is used to describe individual lines in other stars having this characteristic
113: mass-loss signature, only a few stars show even
114: a close resemblance to P Cygni itself throughout the blue-optical region,
115: and all of these stars have been called LBVs. Even
116: amongst these the differences can be striking. For instance, although the LMC LBV-candidate R81 has been described as the ``P Cygni of the LMC" by Wolf et al.\ (1981a), its optical
117: spectrum contains He~I lines without a strong emission component; compare their Fig.~1 with
118: our Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}.
119: Walborn (1989) describes other LBVs at minimum light (i.e., maximum $T_{\rm eff}$) as having
120: the same general spectral characteristics as P Cygni, but the comparison is more apt in
121: some cases than in others.
122: AG~Car (Hutsem\'{e}kers \& Kohoutek 1988, Fig.~1),
123: AF And, M33 Var B (Kenyon \& Gallagher 1985, Figs.~2-3), and R127 (Stahl et al.\ 1983, Fig.~3)
124: do all show the same general P Cygni lines in He~I and in the Balmer lines as does P Cygni,
125: but R71 is an another example where the He~I lines do not show a pronounced
126: emission component (Wolf et al.\ 1981b, Fig.~3). HDE 316285 also shows many
127: similarities in the infrared (McGregor et al.\ 1988) and yellow-red (Morrison \& Rao (1990),
128: but the blue-optical spectra shows little resemblance to P Cygni (Walborn \& Fitzpatrick 2000).
129: In the Milky Way, the LBV He 3-519 (Smith et al.\ 1994) probably bears the most similar spectrum
130: known to P Cygni.
131:
132:
133: Our M31 star is identified in the LGGS catalog as J004341.84+411112.0,
134: based upon its
135: J2000 coordinates
136: (i.e., $\alpha=00^{\rm h}43^{\rm m}41.\!^{\rm s}84$, $\delta=+41^\circ11' 12.\!"0$) determined from
137: USNO-B astrometric positions in the field. It is located in A30, an OB
138: association cataloged by van den Bergh (1964); see Fig.~\ref{fig:fc}.
139: We note with some amusement that one of the original five Hubble-Sandage variables (Hubble \& Sandage 1953), Var 19 = AF And,
140: is located just 2' away\footnote{We eliminated the possibility that we mistakenly observed
141: AF And itself. First, the two stars are clearly distinct. Brian Skiff
142: kindly compared our field to the finding chart of AF And (Variable 19) from Hubble (1929), the paper
143: which first showed that M31 is a galaxy(!), and confirmed the J2000 coordinates from the Two Micron All
144: Sky Survey (2Mass) as $\alpha=00^{\rm h}43^{\rm m}33.\!^{\rm s}08$, $\delta=+41^\circ12'10.\!"3$ (uncertainty $<0.\!"2$), which led to a revision by SIMBAD in their listed
145: position by a few arcseconds. Second, we considered whether or not it was possible
146: for the fiber positioner to have accidently {\it dropped} the fiber button, miraculously hitting the
147: position of AF And rather than our intended target. It was not. For one thing, we made a minor tweak in
148: the positions of all of the fibers half way through the exposure (see above), and the
149: spectrum before
150: and after the reconfiguration matched. In addition, had the button been dropped the positioner would
151: have been unable to retrieve it when we reconfigured for the next field, and that was not the
152: case. We are indebted to Nolan Walborn for raising this particular specter, but we feel it has
153: been completely exorcised.}.
154:
155:
156: The star was first cataloged (as ``40 4631") by
157: Berkhuijsen et al.\ (1988), who presented {\it UBVR$_J$} photometry based upon photographic plates
158: taken in 1963. The next published photometry is given by Magnier et al.\ (1992) from their 1990
159: {\it BVRI} CCD survey of a 1 deg$^2$ field in M31, where it appears as object 228465.
160: If the data are taken at face value, the star brightened by 0.6 mag in $V$, and reddened by 0.5~mag in $B-V$ during
161: the 37 years (see Table~\ref{tab:phot}). However, nearby ($<10'$) stars of a similar
162: brightness
163: show this same offset in $V$, so we discount this as an
164: indication of variability. However, the photographic $B$ value of neighboring stars
165: are more in accord with Magnier et al.\ (1992), albeit with large scatter.
166: The LGGS CCD photometry, carried out in 2001-2002, agrees well with Magnier et al.\ (1992). The slight differences
167: between our two observations (0.06 mag) appears to be real: the formal errors are one-tenth of that, and a comparison
168: of the stars in overlap between the two fields indicate median differences $<0.01$ at all filters except
169: $I$, for which
170: there is a small systematic offset (0.02~mag) for the 2002 observation. G. Jacoby also
171: kindly obtained current-epoch (2005 November)
172: $V$ and $R$ images at WIYN for us, which we have calibrated using the LGGS
173: photometry of stars of similar color. We conclude
174: that over recent times the star has been relatively constant ($<$0.2~mag) in brightness over the
175: past 40 years, but that it does show real variations of order 0.05~mag. This behavior is quite
176: similar to that of P Cygni, although different than many other LBVs (Israelian \& de Groot 1999).
177:
178: Hill et al.\ (1995) identify their UV-bright source 30-3 with this star, using Magnier et al.\ (1992)
179: as a cross-reference.
180: They used {\it Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (UIT)} data, and
181: detected the star in the 2500\AA\ image but not in the 1500\AA\ image\footnote{They also had ground-based {\it B} and {\it R}
182: CCD photometry indicating a
183: magnitude of $B=18.29$, which is about 0.3~mag fainter at $B$ than what was seen by any of the other studies; they
184: estimate their errors as 0.05-0.10 mag, but provide no details (date or telescope) of the
185: observations.
186: One can infer that the observation was likely made in the early 1990s, so similar in time to Magnier et al.\ (1992).
187: They report $R=17.12$, which is in good agreement with the values found by Magnier et al.\ (1992) and the LGGS.}. The fact that the star is UV-bright is consistent with the Massey et al.\ (1996)
188: study of {\it UIT} sources in M33, which discovered many LBV candidates.
189:
190: We checked the {\it HST} data archives for images of the star; only one WFPC2 image
191: contains a (barely) unsaturated exposure. This is a 300 s exposure through the F675W (``R")
192: filter, u42z5701r. The star is in fact slightly extended, with a full-width-at-half-maximum
193: (fwhm) of 2.0 pixels (0.2") of the WF3 chip. Other stars on the image have significantly
194: smaller fwhms, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:radplot}.
195: However, the star does not appear to be double, given
196: the radial profile, just extended. If
197: we make the simple assumption that the size of the image
198: adds in quadrature, then there is something around the star that has a diameter of about
199: $0.\!"015$. At the distance of M31 (760 kpc, according to van den Bergh 2000), this would
200: have a size of 0.5~pc. P Cygni is known to have several shells of gas around it; the most
201: prominent of these has a diameter of 22" (0.2~pc), which is taken as evidence that the star had a major
202: mass-loss event 900 years ago (see discussion in Israelian \& de Groot 1999).
203: If the expansion velocity is the same for our object, then
204: the relevant time scale would be about 2,000 yr. Confirmation with the better scale of the ACS
205: would be desirable; several ACS images in the archive include the field, but the star is
206: saturated\footnote{Our own scheduled parallel imaging of this region did not happen
207: as a result of the failure of the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph.}.
208:
209: Determining the star's absolute visual magnitude requires knowing the reddening. If
210: the star's intrinsic color is the same as P~Cygni's, $(B-V)_0=-0.19$, (Lamers et al.\ 1983),
211: then $E(B-V)=0.64$. The foreground reddening to M31 is $E(B-V)=0.07$,
212: but most of the
213: reddening of OB stars in M31 is due to extinction within the disk of M31 (van den Bergh 2000).
214: Four OB associations
215: away from the minor axis were found to have $E(B-V)=0.12-0.24$ by Massey et al.\ (1986).
216: The reddening across M31
217: is quite patchy, and A30's location is near the minor axis where inclination effects will
218: result in a larger amount of dust through the line of sight, so the value $E(B-V)=0.64$ seems
219: quite reasonable.
220: We derive an absolute visual magnitude of $M_V=-8.9$.
221: This may be compared to
222: P Cygni's absolute visual magnitude, $M=-8.3$ (Lamers et al.\ 1983). If the effective temperatures
223: (and hence bolometric corrections) are similar as well, as is
224: implied by the strong spectral similarities, we can scale P Cygni's bolometric luminosity by 0.6~mag
225: as well, and expect that our star has $L/L_\odot=10^{6.1}$.
226: In Fig.~\ref{fig:tracks} we show the location of the star in the H-R diagram along with the
227: evolutionary tracks for z=0.04 (corresponding to the metallicity of M31's HII regions according to Zaritsky et al.\ 1994) from Meynet \& Maeder (2005).
228: According to their calculations, an object in this part of the H-R diagram would be
229: spectroscopically identified as a late-type WN (WNL) Wolf-Rayet star,
230: and should never undergo an LBV phase as such.
231: However, Andre Maeder (private communication) emphasizes that since their calculations are
232: hydrostatic one can not really tell what stage a star is in (LBV vs WNL) from the models,
233: as the difference between the
234: two may be primarily one of atmospheric extent. The star may be at a transition point, and may
235: evolve to the WNL stage after episodes of mass loss. There are hints in the spectra that the
236: star is nitrogen-rich (Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}), as is P Cygni and many other LBVs
237: (Walborn 1989); a better spectrum is needed for modeling the CNO
238: abundances, and such work is planned.
239:
240: \section{Summary and Discussion}
241:
242: The LGGS project has obtained photometry of $>$350,000 stars seen towards M31. One of the
243: brightest of these, LGGS 004341.84+411112.0, turns out to have a spectrum that is remarkably
244: similar to that of the P Cygni, one of the best studied LBVs in the Milky Way.
245: The star has been relatively constant
246: in $B$ over the past 40 years, with variations $<0.2$~mag, but with evidence of variations of 0.05~mag
247: during a year. Much the same can be said for P Cygni (Israelian \& de Groot 1999).
248: However, the star has likely had an outburst two millennia ago, as judged by the fact that the
249: star is slightly extended {\it HST} images, indicative of a 0.5~pc nebula, similar to the 0.2~pc
250: nebula seen around P~Cygni. This has consequences for interpreting the nature of objects
251: found with spectroscopic similarity to other known LBVs; these stars are considered LBV
252: ``candidates" until variability is established, but the present study emphasizes that this may
253: require more than a lifetime.
254:
255: If we assume that the spectral similarity of our star to that of P Cygni is indicative of a similar
256: effective temperature (and hence intrinsic color and
257: bolometric correction), we can place the star on the H-R diagram
258: using our photometry. The star falls on the evolutionary track for a 85$M_\odot$ star at the
259: extreme end its evolution to cooler temperature, just as the evolutionary tracks turns to
260: lower luminosity (Meynet \& Maeder 2005). The star is likely in a transition between an O star
261: and a WNL. This provides strong vindication of the current generation of stellar evolutionary
262: models that include rotation, but it also notes the difficulties in interpreting the evolution
263: phases implied by the models.
264: An atmospheric analysis of the star is planned, and long-term follow-up (both photometric and
265: spectroscopic) is warranted.
266:
267: \acknowledgements
268:
269: We are grateful for suggestions by an anonymous referee, as well as help from
270: George Jacoby and Brian Skiff.
271: Andre Maeder and
272: Georges Meynet made very useful comments on the issue of the evolutionary status of this
273: object. The spectroscopic
274: observations were carried out with aid from Daryl Willmarth, Di Harmer, George Will, and
275: Hillary Mathis. Parts of this project were funded by the NSF through grant 0093060,
276: and by NASA through a grant (GO-9794) from the Space Telescope Science Institute,
277: which is is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.
278:
279: \begin{references}
280:
281: \reference {} Berkhuijsen, E. M., Humphreys, R. M., Ghigo, F. D., \& Zumach, W. 1988, A\&A, 192, 299
282:
283: \reference {} Davidson, K., Moffat, A. F. J., \& Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Physics
284: of Luminous Blue Variables (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
285:
286: \reference {} de Groot, M., \& Sterken, C. 2001, ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 233, P Cygni 2000:
287: 400 Years of Progress
288:
289: \reference {} Gallagher, J. S. 1997,
290: in Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition, ed. A. Nota \& H. J. G. L. M. Lamers
291: (San Francisco: ASP), 389
292:
293: \reference {} Hill, J. K. et al.\ 1995, ApJS, 98, 595
294:
295: \reference {} Hodge, P. W. 1981, Atlas of the Andromeda Galaxy (Seattle: Univ of Washington Press)
296:
297: \reference {} Hubble, E. P. 1929, ApJ 69, 103
298:
299: \reference {} Hubble, E., \& Sandage, A. 1953, ApJ, 118, 353
300:
301: \reference {} Hutsem\'{e}kers, D., \& Kohoutek, L. 1988, A\&AS, 73, 217
302:
303: \reference {} Israelian, G., \& de Groot, M. 1999, SSRv, 90, 493
304:
305: \reference {} Kenyon, S. J., \& Gallagher, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 290, 542
306:
307: \reference {} Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., de Groot, M., \& Cassatella, A. 1983, A\&A, 128, 299
308:
309: \reference {} McGregor, P. J., Hyland, A. R., \& Hillier, D. J. 1988, ApJ, 324, 1071
310:
311: \reference {} Magnier, E. A., Lewin, W. H. G., van Pardijs, J., Hasinger, G., Jain, A., Pietsch, W.,
312: Tr\"{u}mper, J. 1992, A\&AS, 96, 379
313:
314: \reference {} Massey, P. 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 15
315:
316: \reference {} Massey, P., Armandroff, T. E., \& Conti, P. S. 1986, AJ, 92, 1303
317:
318: \reference {} Massey, P., Bianchi, L., Hutchings, J. B., \& Stecher, T. P. 1996, ApJ, 469, 629
319:
320: \reference {} Maeder, A. \& Meynet, G. 2000, A\&A, 361, 159
321:
322: \reference {} Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A. 2005, A\&A, 429, 581
323:
324: \reference {} Morrison, N. D., Rao, S. M. 1990, in Properties of Hot Luminous Stars, ed. C. D. Garmany (San Francisco: ASP), 53
325:
326: \reference {} Nota, A., \& Lamers, J. G. L. M., ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 120, Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition (San Francisco: ASP)
327:
328: \reference {} Parker, J. W. 1997, in ASP Conf.\ Ser. 120, Luminous Blue Variables:
329: Massive stars in Transition (San Francisco: ASP), 368
330:
331: \reference {} Smith, L. J., Crowther, P. A., \& Prinja, R. K. 1994, A\&A, 281, 833
332:
333: \reference {} Stahl, O., Mandel, H., Wolf, B., G\"{a}ng, Th., Kaufer, A., Kneer, R., Szeifert, Th., \& Shao,
334: F. 1993, A\&AS, 99, 167
335:
336: \reference {} Stahl, O., Wolf, B., Klare, G., Cassatella, A., Krautter, J., Persi, P.,
337: Ferrari-Toniolo, M. 1983, A\&A, 127, 49
338:
339: \reference {} van den Bergh, S. 1964, ApJS, 9, 65
340:
341: \reference {} van den Bergh, S. 2000, The Galaxies of the Local Group (Cambridge: University Press),
342: 44
343:
344: \reference {} Walborn, N. R. 1989, in Physics of Luminous Blue Variables, ed. K. Davidson,
345: A. f. J. Moffat, \& H. J. G. L. M. Lamers (Dordrect: Kluwer), 27
346:
347: \reference {} Walborn, N. R. \& Fitzpatrick, E. L. 2000, PASP, 112, 50
348:
349: \reference {} Wolf, B., Appenzeller, I., \& Stahl, O. 1981b, A\&A, 103, 94
350:
351: \reference {} Wolf, B., Stahl, O., de Groot, M. J. H., \& Sterken, C. 1981a, A\&A, 99, 351
352:
353: \reference {} Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C., \& Huchra, J. P. 1994, ApJ, 420, 87
354:
355:
356: \end{references}
357:
358: \clearpage
359:
360: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c c c c c c c l}
361: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
362: \tablewidth{0pc}
363: \tablenum{1}
364: \tablecolumns{12}
365: \tablecaption{\label{tab:phot}Photometry of LGGS 004341.84+411112.0}
366: \tablehead{
367: \colhead{Date} &
368: \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$\sigma_V$} &
369: \colhead{$B-V$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{B-V}$} &
370: \colhead{$U-B$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{U-B}$} &
371: \colhead{$V-R$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\sigma_{V-R}$} &
372: \colhead{$R-I$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\sigma_{R-I}$} &
373: \colhead{Ref/ID\tablenotemark{b}}
374: }
375: \startdata
376: 1963 Aug/Sep & 18.13 & 0.19 &-0.14 & 0.29 & -0.31 & 0.26 & \nodata\tablenotemark{c} & \nodata\tablenotemark{c} &\nodata & \nodata &[BHG88] 40 4631\\
377: 1990 Sep 12-27 & 17.531 & 0.061 & 0.407 & 0.088 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.408 & 0.097 & 0.229 & 0.086 &[MLV92] 228465\\
378: 2001 Sep 20-22 & 17.583 & 0.004 & 0.432 & 0.005 & -0.750 & 0.004 & 0.387 & 0.006 & 0.222 & 0.006 &LGGS 004341.84+411112.0\\
379: 2002 Sep 11 & 17.511 & 0.005 & 0.478 & 0.005 & -0.771 & 0.005 & 0.421 & 0.005 & 0.332: & 0.005 & LGGS 004341.84+411112.0 \\
380: 2005 Nov 7 & 17.458 & 0.005 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 0.411 & 0.005 & \nodata & \nodata & New \\
381: \enddata
382: \tablenotetext{a}{$R$ and $I$ are on the Kron-Cousins system.}
383: \tablenotetext{b}{BHG88=Berkhuijsen et al.\ 1988; MLV92=Magnier et al.\ 1992; LGGS=Massey
384: et al.\ in prep.}
385: \tablenotetext{c}{Berkhuijsen et al.\ 1988 do report {\it R} photometry, but it appears to be on the
386: Johnson rather than Kron-Cousins system.}
387: \end{deluxetable}
388:
389:
390: \clearpage
391: \begin{figure}
392: \plotone{f1.eps}
393: \caption{\label{fig:spectra} Comparison of the spectrum of LGGS J004341.84+411112.0 with
394: P~Cygni. Major lines have been identified; see also Stahl et al.\ (1993)}
395: \end{figure}
396:
397: \clearpage
398: \begin{figure}
399: \epsscale{0.72}
400: \plotone{f2.eps}
401: \caption{\label{fig:fc} The location of LGGS J004341.84+41112.0. This star circled in the middle
402: of this $V$ image (from the LGGS)
403: is the newly found P Cygni analog. The well-known LBV AF And is located
404: 2' to the NW. The circles have a diameter of 10".
405: The outlines of the two OB associations A30 and A29 (van den Bergh 1964),
406: based upon Hodge (1981).
407: }
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: \clearpage
411:
412: \clearpage
413: \begin{figure}
414: \epsscale{0.72}
415: \plotone{f3.eps}
416: \caption{\label{fig:radplot} Spatial extension of LGGS J004341.84+411112.0. The radial profile of
417: J004341.84+4111112.0 was measured from a WFPC2 image (WF3 chip), and is shown in red.
418: The profile of another star on the same WF3 image is shown in black for comparison.
419: }
420: \end{figure}
421:
422: \begin{figure}
423: \epsscale{0.72}
424: \plotone{f4.eps}
425: \caption{\label{fig:tracks}. The location of M31's P Cygni analog in the H-R diagram.
426: We have plotted the location of LGGS J004341.84+411112.0 as a black dot, where we
427: have {\it assumed} that its
428: bolometric correction and effective temperatures are the same as those of P Cygni (Lamers
429: et al.\ 1983). The evolutionary tracks of Meynet \& Maeder (2005) for an initial rotation
430: velocity of 300 km s$^{-1}$ are shown as solid colored lines,
431: with the initial masses indicated. The star would appear to be at the coolest point in the
432: evolution of a 85$M_\odot$ star, likely a transition point between an O star and a Wolf-Rayet.
433: }
434: \end{figure}
435:
436: \end{document}
437:
438:
439: