1: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Far Ultraviolet Spectral Images of the Cygnus Loop}
4: \shortauthors{Seon et al.}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{{\em SPEAR} Far Ultraviolet Spectral Images of the Cygnus Loop}%
9:
10: \author{Kwang-Il Seon\altaffilmark{1},
11: Wonyong Han\altaffilmark{1},
12: Uk-Won Nam\altaffilmark{1},
13: Jang-Hyun Park\altaffilmark{1},\\
14: Jerry Edelstein\altaffilmark{2},
15: Eric J. Korpela\altaffilmark{2},
16: Ravi Sankrit\altaffilmark{3}, \\
17: Kyoung-Wook Min\altaffilmark{4},
18: Kwangsun Ryu\altaffilmark{4},
19: and Il-Joong Kim\altaffilmark{4},
20: }%
21: \affil{$^1$Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1 Hwaam-dong Yuseong-gu Daejeon, 305-348, Korea}
22: \affil{$^2$Space Sciences Lab., University of California, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450, USA}
23: \affil{$^3$Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3400 North Charles Street,
24: Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}
25: \affil{$^4$Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea}
26: \email{kiseon@kasi.re.kr}%, whan@kasi.re.kr, uwnam@kasi.re.kr, jhpark@kasi.re.kr,\\
27: %jerrye@ssl.berkeley.edu, korpela@ssl.berkeley.edu, ravi@pha.jhu.edu, \\
28: %kwmin@space.kaist.ac.kr, ksryu@satrec.kaist.ac.kr, urania@space.kaist.ac.kr}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: We present far-ultraviolet (FUV) spectral images,
32: measured at \ion{C}{4} $\lambda$1550,
33: \ion{He}{2} $\lambda$1640, \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] $\lambda$1400, and \ion{O}{3}] $\lambda$1664,
34: of the entire Cygnus Loop,
35: observed with the Spectroscopy of Plasma Evolution from Astrophysical Radiation ({\em SPEAR})
36: instrument, also known as {\em FIMS}.
37: The spatial distribution of FUV emission generally corresponds with a limb-brightened
38: shell, and is similar to optical, radio and X-ray images.
39: The features found in the present work include a ``carrot'', diffuse interior,
40: and breakout features, which have not been seen in previous FUV studies.
41: Shock velocities of 140--160 km s$^{-1}$ is found from a line ratio of
42: \ion{O}{4}] to \ion{O}{3}], which is insensitive not only to resonance scattering
43: but also to elemental abundance.
44: The estimated velocity indicates that the fast shocks are widespread across the
45: remnant.
46: By comparing various line ratios with steady-state shock models,
47: it is also shown that the resonance scattering is widespread.
48: \end{abstract}%
49:
50: \keywords{supernova remnants --- ultraviolet: ISM --- ISM: individual
51: (\objectname{Cygnus Loop}) --- shock waves}%
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The Cygnus Loop is one of the most well-studied supernova remnants (SNRs)
56: in our galaxy because of its large apparent angular size, its high surface brightness,
57: and its low reddening.
58: It is generally considered the prototypical ``middle-aged'' SNR.
59: Global features of the Cygnus Loop have been studied
60: in great detail at optical, X-ray, radio, and infrared wavelengths
61: \citep{Levenson1998, AL1999, LRB1997, ADL1992}.
62: X-rays are emitted from hot (temperature $T\sim10^6$ K) gas heated by shocks with
63: velocities $v_s \sim400$ km s$^{-1}$, while
64: optical emission arises from slower shocks
65: in which the postshock region cools to $T\sim10^4$ K.
66: Observations of far-ultraviolet (FUV) emission from
67: intermediate temperatures gas,
68: mostly limited to small spatial regions,
69: have played an important role for the
70: reliable estimation of shock speeds and elemental abundances.
71: Early studies concentrated on bright optical filaments
72: and compared FUV spectra with steady-flow shock models
73: \citep{Benvenuti1980, Raymond1980, Raymond1981, Raymond2001, Blair1991}.
74: Subsequent investigations, focused on fainter filaments
75: \citep{Raymond1983,Long1992,Sankrit2000,Sankrit2002},
76: have shown the complexities involved including the effects of
77: geometry, shock incompleteness, resonance line scattering,
78: dust grain destruction.
79:
80: FUV observations of the entire Cygnus Loop are of great interest because
81: they provide a global understanding of the interaction between the X-ray
82: and optical emitting components.
83: \cite{CP1976} obtained images from a portion of the Cygnus Loop in two
84: broad bands (1250--1600 and 1050--1600\AA).
85: \cite{Blair1991} and \cite{RM1992} have produced
86: skymaps with nearly complete coverage of the Cygnus Loop,
87: measured at \ion{O}{6} $\lambda\lambda$1032, 1038.
88: Observations of five 40$\arcmin$ diameter fields
89: around the Cygnus Loop rim
90: with higher spatial resolution were obtained with the
91: UIT \citep{Cornett1992, Danforth2000}.
92:
93: We report the first FUV spectral line images of the entire Cygnus Loop,
94: These images,
95: with spatial resolution of 3$\arcmin$ to 30$\arcmin$,
96: were obtained with {\em SPEAR} (The Spectroscopy of
97: Plasma Emission from Astrophysical Radiation), also known as {\em FIMS}
98: (Far-ultraviolet IMaging Spectrograph).
99: We describe how these data reveal physical conditions in the remnant and
100: complement earlier observations.
101:
102: \section{Observations and Analysis}
103: {\em SPEAR} is a dual-channel FUV imaging spectrograph (Short channel `S': 900--1150\AA,
104: Long channel `L': 1330--1720\AA, $\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 550$)
105: with a large field of view (S channel: 4.0$^\circ\times4.6'$, L channel: 7.5$^\circ\times4.3'$),
106: designed to observe diffuse FUV emission lines.
107: {\em SPEAR} is the primary payload on the first Korean Science and Technology SATellite
108: (STSAT-1) and was launched into a $\sim$700 km sun-synchronous orbit on 27 September 2003.
109: The {\em SPEAR} instruments, their on-orbit performance, and the basic
110: processing of instrument data are described in detail by \citet{Edelstein2005a,Edelstein2005b}.
111:
112: The Cygnus Loop was observed during 30 orbits between July 12 and July 22, 2004.
113: Of these, we used 11 orbits that include reliable attitude knowledge
114: of $\leq$ 30$\arcmin$.
115: The observation, totaling 6067 seconds, were taken in the 10\%
116: slit transmission mode.
117: A total of $\sim$1.6$\times$10$^5$ events were recorded.
118: The Cygnus Loop was observed by scanning the region along
119: the $\sim$4.5$\arcmin$ directions of the {\em SPEAR} field of view
120: with the field oriented nearly parallel to the $\alpha$ sky coordinate.
121: The aspect for these data was determined by comparing the positions of
122: observed bright stars with the TD-1 catalog \citep{Thompson1978}.
123: The position errors of the bright stars
124: along the scanning ($\Delta\delta$)
125: and spatial direction ($\Delta\alpha$) directions
126: were considered as
127: functions of $\delta$, ignoring errors in position angle.
128: The corrected positions of the bright stars coincided
129: to within 5$\arcmin$ of their TD-1 positions.
130: Position errors of all photons were interpolated linearly
131: from the bright stars' position errors.
132: All the photon events near the locations of the 11 brightest
133: TD-1 stars were removed to avoid stellar contamination.
134: The removed star pixels are indicated in Figure \ref{fig1}, together with
135: the names of characteristic SNR features.
136: Exposure maps were created by accumulating time-marked exposure event records to the sky
137: \citep{Edelstein2005b}.
138: Although the \ion{O}{6} emission line
139: from the Cygnus remnant is apparent in a preliminary analysis,
140: we do not further discuss the S channel data here
141: because difficult statistics require more extensive analysis.
142:
143: To generate a net emission-line image,
144: we fit the spectrum in each pixel with
145: a constant continuum plus a spectral resolution-width
146: Gaussian function, fixed at the corresponding emission line center.
147: The approach,
148: basically an application of
149: a Bayesian method to estimate signal amplitude in the presence
150: of background assuming Poisson statistics \citep{Sivia1996},
151: avoids over-subtraction
152: that can occur by simply using line-adjacent spectral regions
153: for continuum removal.
154: The {\em SPEAR} Cygnus Loop images obtained are sparsely occupied --
155: pixels may contain only a few counts.
156: To better estimate the surface brightness distribution,
157: we rebinned the images using a Gaussian function
158: with a position-variable angular scale
159: through an adaptive kernel method similar to that of \cite{HS1996} and \cite{EWR2000}.
160: The method overcomes fixed-size rebinning limitations that occur
161: when surface brightness or noise vary significantly across the image.
162:
163: \section{Results}
164:
165: The {\em SPEAR} FUV spectra from the entire Cygnus Loop SNR region
166: and from the characteristic features indicated in Figure \ref{fig1} are shown
167: in Figure \ref{fig2}.
168: A background spectrum has been subtracted using the data obtained from nearby faint skies.
169: The spectra clearly shows lines of many different ions including \ion{C}{4},
170: \ion{He}{2}, and \ion{N}{4}], and
171: the unresolved line complexes from
172: \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] and \ion{O}{3}].
173: It is also evident that the absolute and relative intensity of emission lines
174: vary between the regions.
175: Table \ref{table1} shows the reddening corrected FUV line luminosities for each region
176: as well as those averaged over the entire SNR.
177: A distance of 440 pc is assumed for their estimations \citep{Blair1999}.
178: The \ion{C}{3}, \ion{O}{6}, and X-ray luminosities, which are scaled
179: to the distance of 440 pc from the originally published values
180: \citep{Blair1991,Ku1984}, are also shown for comparison.
181: The \ion{C}{4} luminosity is a bit larger that the total 0.1--4 keV
182: X-ray luminosity.
183:
184: Figure \ref{fig3} shows the spectral images of the entire Cygnus Loop obtained with {\em SPEAR}
185: for the \ion{C}{4} ($\lambda\lambda$1548, 1550\AA),
186: \ion{O}{3}] ($\lambda\lambda$1661, 1667\AA), \ion{He}{2} ($\lambda$1640\AA)
187: and \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] ($\lambda\lambda$1393, 1404\AA, unresolved).
188: The 0.03$^\circ$sky coordinates ($\alpha$, $\delta$) were binned with
189: smoothing kernel scales of $\sim$3$\arcmin$ to $\sim$30$\arcmin$ (1 $\sigma$ width).
190: To derive the \ion{C}{4} spectral image intensity, we have assumed 2:1 line ratio for
191: 1548\AA\ and 1550\AA\ doublet lines applicable to a thin plasma.
192: % The emission maps of \ion{Si}{4} and \ion{O}{4}] could not be calculated
193: % separately because their spectra are unresolved.
194: For the \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] spectral image intensity, we
195: assumed two Gaussian lines having a $\sim$1:5.5 line ratio centered at 1393 and 1404\AA.
196: These line ratios were selected by averaging line ratios observed with {\em HUT}
197: \citep{Blair2002}.
198: Similarly, the \ion{O}{3}] lines are assumed to be formed in a doublet at $\lambda$1661
199: and $\lambda$1666 in the ratio of their statistical weights (0.41:1).
200: Signal to noise ratios of line intensities enclosed by the contours shown
201: in Figure \ref{fig3} are higher than at least two.
202: Although all of the FUV emission line images are generally similar,
203: differences in their detailed features are indeed apparent
204: as discussed below.
205:
206: We compare the FUV spectra with
207: models \citep{HRH1987} that estimate
208: spectral line ratios as functions of shock velocity.
209: The models, while generated to predict parameters for regions of
210: higher density than encountered here, produce the correct relative
211: line intensities for the Cygnus region \citep{Cornett1992,
212: Blair1991}.
213: The model results can also be
214: complicated by many
215: effects, such as superposition of features, multiple shock velocities, and
216: resonance scattering \citep{Raymond1981,Danforth2000}.
217: Shock velocities for each image pixel were calculated from
218: various FUV line ratios
219: that were dereddened using $E(B-V)=0.08$ \citep{Miller1974}
220: and the average extinction curve of \citet{Cardelli1989}.
221: The resulting shock velocities were found to be 105--130, 90--100, and 140--180 km s$^{-1}$,
222: from the line ratios of \ion{C}{4}
223: to \ion{O}{3}], \ion{C}{4} to \ion{He}{2}, and \ion{O}{4}] to \ion{O}{3}],
224: respectively.
225: Here, the line intensity of \ion{O}{4}] was calculated from the intensity of
226: \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] assuming their line ratio of 1:5.5.
227: In most parts of the SNR, the
228: \ion{O}{4}]/\ion{O}{3}] estimated shock velocity
229: was in the range of 140--160 km s$^{-1}$.
230: Relatively uniform shock velocity distributions
231: were obtained except in the brightest position of the XA region
232: where an estimated velocity of 180 km s$^{-1}$ was found
233: from the \ion{O}{4}]/\ion{O}{3}] ratio.
234: \citet{Danforth2001} found substantially different line ratios
235: of \ion{Si}{4} to \ion{O}{4} at the XA region from the values
236: of \citet{Blair2002}.
237: Adopting the line ratio at the XA region,
238: we found no such high velocity region.
239:
240: \section{Discussions}
241:
242: \cite{Cornett1992} observed a 40$'$ diameter field named the ``XA'' region \citep{HC1986}
243: and centered at $\alpha\sim20^{\rm h}57^{\rm m}30^{\rm s}$,
244: $\delta\sim31^\circ7\arcmin36\arcsec$ with UIT.
245: They found the UIT feature closely follows a ``bow shock''
246: shape in {\em Einsten} HRI X-ray imagery.
247: The contours in Figure \ref{fig3} clearly show that the ``XA'' region is
248: the brightest region of the Cygnus Loop in the FUV emissions considered here,
249: although
250: the brightest positions in the FUV line maps do not exactly coincide.
251: Indeed, the ``XA'' region is seen to be brightest in many wavelengths.
252: \citet{HC1986} suggested that the enhanced ``XA'' region X-ray emission
253: is caused by a reflected shock resulting from a collision of the
254: blast wave with a cloud such as that seen in \ion{H}{1} maps of the area.
255:
256: The northeastern (NE) cloud radiative filaments, north of the XA region,
257: are clearly detected in the four FUV emission maps,
258: although again with differing locations of maximum brightness
259: which must indicates some range of morphological conditions.
260: The \ion{H}{1} associated with the NE cloud region has been identified
261: by \citet{Leahy2003}.
262: The \ion{H}{1} is a clear evidence for the clouds that the Cygnus Loop
263: shocks are interacting with.
264: The NE cloud extends into the southern portions of the northeastern
265: nonradiative field where
266: filaments extend counterclockwise from the northern limb and can
267: be seen prominently in H$\alpha$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Levenson1998}.
268: Portions of these filaments have been extensively studied by
269: \citet{Raymond1983}, \citet{Blair1991}, and \citet{Long1992}.
270: \citet{Danforth2000} presented an FUV image of the nonradiative filaments
271: with the UIT B5, which they conclude is a mixture mainly of \ion{C}{4}
272: and two-photon emission.
273: We observe \ion{C}{4} and \ion{He}{2} emissions from
274: the nonradiative region, as visible in Figures \ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3}.
275: Comparison of the \ion{C}{4} map with the H$\alpha$ maps of \citet{Levenson1998}
276: (see Fig.~\ref{fig1}(a)) shows that the
277: \ion{C}{4} emission follows the overall features of the H$\alpha$ emission.
278: The reddening-corrected flux of \ion{C}{4} we observe correspond to a
279: surface brightness of $1.0-4.3\times10^{-5}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$,
280: consistent with the value, $3.9\times10^{-5}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$,
281: from the ``south shock''
282: nonradiative front
283: observed with {\em HST} STIS \citep{Sankrit2000},
284: and a somewhat less than the value, $6.3\times10^{-5}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$,
285: obtained with the {\em HUT} \citep{Long1992}.
286: Our maximum \ion{C}{4} flux value is a factor of $\sim$3 below
287: that reported by \citet{Raymond1983} and observed in the ``bright shock''
288: with the STIS \citep{Sankrit2000}.
289: We attribute this variation to the observatories different
290: fields of view.
291: We also note the relative weakness or nondetection of \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}]
292: and \ion{O}{3}] emissions in the nonradiative
293: regions, as can be seen in Figures \ref{fig1}(b) and \ref{fig1}(d).
294: Radiative filaments show lines of
295: many different ions while nonradiative filaments show only lines of the
296: highest-ionization species \citep{Long1992, Danforth2000}.
297: Thus, we might conclude that the \ion{C}{4} and \ion{He}{2} emissions observed here
298: originate primarily from nonradiatve shocks,
299: although the {\em SPEAR} spatial resolution does not allow
300: a clear separation between non-radiative and
301: radiative regions.
302:
303: The interior of the Cygnus Loop contains diffuse emission and filaments.
304: One noticeable interior feature in the FUV images (Fig.~\ref{fig2}) is the ``carrot''
305: (at $\alpha\sim20^{\rm h}49^{\rm m}$, $\delta\sim31{^\circ}40'$),
306: seen as a somewhat isolated vertical group
307: of filaments in the \ion{O}{3}] image.
308: A bright spot in the ``carrot''
309: (at $\alpha\sim20^{\rm h}49^{\rm m}$, $\delta\sim31{^\circ}20'$) coincides
310: in all four FUV spectral images.
311: Another region of diffuse emission in the \ion{C}{4}, \ion{He}{2}, and \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}]
312: maps, also visible in optical images, runs
313: north-south across the center of the remnant,
314: around $\alpha\sim20^{\rm h}51^{\rm m}-52^{\rm m}$, $\delta\sim30^\circ20'-31^\circ10'$.
315:
316: The western filaments were also detected in the four FUV emission lines, for which
317: the spatial features generally coincide.
318: \citet{Ku1984} found an X-ray bow-shaped shock front or a ``V'' feature on the southwest limb,
319: which has no optical counterparts.
320: \citet{AL1999} noted that the ``V'' feature has a cool right wing, and
321: a hot left wing.
322: A 1420-MHz image \citep{LRB1997} shows radio continuum emission
323: coincident with the ``V'' feature
324: that is particularly bright along the eastern side.
325: The \ion{C}{4} image in Figure \ref{fig1}(a) shows no counterparts to the ``V'' feature,
326: although the images show a bright feature to the north of the ``V''.
327: The absence of optical and FUV counterparts implies that the X-ray and
328: radio emission do not originate from dense radiative cooling regions but from
329: hotter gas, as suggested by \citet{Leahy2004}.
330:
331: The breakout is the most significant departure from circularity in the remnant.
332: \citet{Leahy2002} discusses \ion{H}{1} observations of the Cygnus Loop which
333: show two cavities for the northern main part and the southern `breakout' part,
334: which are at two different velocities, and suggests that the cause may be either
335: one supernova explosion interacting with two blister regions
336: or two separate explosions.
337: %The advance of the blast wave in the breakout, compared with other portions of
338: %the remnant, implies that the ambient density is lower in this region
339: %and that the blast wave has now encountered atomic gas.
340: The \ion{C}{4} image (Fig.~\ref{fig3}) shows the south breakout region,
341: particularly in its eastern portion.
342: The western region of the breakout is also weakly detected in the \ion{C}{4} map.
343: Figure \ref{fig1}(d) also shows marginal detection of the eastern region of
344: the breakout in \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] emission.
345:
346: We also note that the southeastern (SE) cloud was detected in \ion{C}{4} and \ion{He}{2} emissions.
347: The region is an example of a cloud that is extended along the line of sight
348: but is not necessarily large across the plane of the sky \citet{Levenson1998}.
349: The \ion{H}{1} cloud associated with the SE region has been identified by \citet{Leahy2005}.
350: The boundary of the southeast corner and brightest part of the \ion{H}{1} ring matches
351: the boundary of the X-ray emission and of the optical and FUV emissions of the southeast knot.
352:
353: As column density increases,
354: the \ion{C}{4} and \ion{He}{2} lines saturate due to resonance scattering effects,
355: while the intermediate lines,
356: such as \ion{O}{4}] and \ion{O}{3}], show little attenuation.
357: \cite{Cornett1992} and \cite{Danforth2000}
358: found that
359: resonance scattering in the strong FUV permitted lines is widespread in
360: the Cygnus Loop, especially in the bright optical filaments.
361: In this context, the line ratio \ion{O}{4}]/\ion{O}{3}] is an ideal
362: diagnostic for shock velocities.
363: The ratio is also insensitive to elemental abundance, as both lines
364: arise from the same element.
365: The ubiquity of \ion{O}{6} emission found by \citet{Blair1991}
366: implies that shocks with velocity greater than 160 km s$^{-1}$ are widespread
367: throughout the SNR.
368: The shock velocity estimated, using the ratio \ion{O}{4}]/\ion{O}{3}],
369: confirms that fast shocks are widespread in the Cygnus Loop.
370: In fact, the \ion{Si}{4} to \ion{O}{4}] ratio, used in the derivation of
371: \ion{O}{4}] line intensity, varies with shock velocity
372: \citep{Sankrit2003}.
373: Using the ratio $\sim$ 1:2 at shock velocity of 120 km s$^{-1}$, we obtained the
374: same shock velocity range.
375: \citet{Danforth2001} found, from a detailed analysis of
376: the XA region, that a significant column depth is present at all positions, including
377: those not near bright optical or UV filaments.
378: The lower velocity values obtained here from the ratio \ion{C}{4}/\ion{O}{3}]
379: and (even lower from) \ion{C}{4}/\ion{He}{2},
380: together with relatively uniform velocity-distributions,
381: also indicate that the resonance scattering in FUV permitted lines
382: is widespread across the Cygnus Loop.
383:
384: \section{Concluding Remarks}
385:
386: The {\em SPEAR} FUV spectral images of the Cygnus Loop offer a new
387: view of the SNR physical environment and conditions.
388: We find that the remnant's projected diffuse interior, ``carrot'', breakout region,
389: and periphery show correlated FUV, optical, X-ray, and radio emission.
390: The FUV emission can be well explained by the scenario wherein
391: the Cygnus Loop has been created by a cavity explosion \citep{Levenson1997},
392: with the presence of large clouds around its periphery \citep{HC1986, HRB1994, Leahy2002}.
393: Further study of these {\em SPEAR} data will provide insight into the overall
394: shock energetics through a more detailed
395: comparison with earlier observations.
396: These data will be particularly important for studying the NE nonradiative
397: shock,
398: where an additional set of {\em SPEAR} short-wavelength data
399: is expected to reveal large-scale features of \ion{O}{6} emission.
400:
401: \acknowledgments
402: {\em SPEAR/FIMS} is a joint project of
403: Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute,
404: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology,
405: and the University of California at Berkeley,
406: funded by the Korea Ministry of Science and Technology
407: and the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NAG5-5355.
408:
409: \begin{thebibliography}
410:
411: \bibitem[Arendt, Dwek, \& Leisawitz(1992)]{ADL1992} Arendt, R., Dwek, E.,
412: \& Leisawitz, D. 1992, \apj, 400, 562
413:
414: \bibitem[Aschenbach \& Leahy(1999)]{AL1999} Aschenbach, B., \& Leahy, D. A.
415: 1999, \aap, 341, 602
416:
417: \bibitem[Benvenuti, Dopita, \& D'Odorico(1980)]{Benvenuti1980} Benvenuti, P.,
418: Dopita, M., \& D'Odorico, S.~1979, \nat, 277, 99
419:
420: \bibitem[Blair et al.(1991)]{Blair1991} Blair, W. P., Long, K. S.,
421: Vancura, O., \& Holberg, J. B. 1991, \apj, 374, 202
422:
423: \bibitem[Blair et al.(1999)]{Blair1999} Blair, W. P., Sankrit, R.,
424: Raymond, J. C., \& Long, K. S. 1999, \apj, 118, 942
425:
426: \bibitem[Blair, Sankrit, \& Tulin(2002)]{Blair2002} Blair, W. P., Sankrit, R.,
427: \& Tulin, S. 2002, \apjs, 140, 367
428:
429: \bibitem[Bohigas, Sauvageot, \& Decourchelle(1999)]{Bohigas1999} Bohigas, J.,
430: Sauvageot, J. L., \& Decourchelle, A. 1999, \apj, 518, 324
431:
432: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis(1989)]{Cardelli1989} Cardelli, J. A.,
433: Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S.~1989, \apj, 345, 245
434:
435: \bibitem[Carruthers \& Page(1976)]{CP1976} Carruthers, G. R., \& Page, T. 1976, \apj, 205, 397
436:
437: \bibitem[Cornett et al.(1992)]{Cornett1992} Cornett, R. H., Jenkins, E. B., Bohlin, R. C.,
438: Cheng, K.-P., Gull, T. R., O'Connell, R. W., Parker, R. A. R., Soberts, M. S., Smith, A. M.,
439: Smith, E. P., \& Stecher, T. P.~1992, \apjl, 395, L9
440:
441: \bibitem[Danforth et al.(2000)]{Danforth2000} Danforth, C. W., Cornett, R. H.,
442: Levenson, N. A., Blair, W. P., Stecher, T. P.~2000, \apj, 119, 2319
443:
444: \bibitem[Danforth, Blair, \& Raymond(2001)]{Danforth2001} Danforth, C. W.,
445: Blair, W. P., \& Raymond, J. C.~2001, \apj, 122, 938
446:
447: \bibitem[D'Odorico et al.(1980)]{DOdorico1980} D'Odorico, S., Benvenuti, P.,
448: Dennefeld, M., Dopita, M. A., \& Greve, A.~1980, \apj, 92, 22
449:
450: \bibitem[Ebeling, White, \& Rangarajan(2000)]{EWR2000} Ebeling, H., White, D. A., \&
451: Rangarajan, F. V. N. 2000, \mnras, submitted. Chandra TCD user guide (2001)
452:
453: \bibitem[Edelstein et al.(2005a)]{Edelstein2005a} Edelstein, J., FIMS teams,
454: 2005a, \apjl, this volume.
455:
456: \bibitem[Edelstein et al.(2005b)]{Edelstein2005b} Edelstein, J., FIMS teams,
457: 2005b, \apjl, this volume.
458:
459: \bibitem[Hartigan, Raymond, \& Hartmann(1987)]{HRH1987} Hartigan, P., Raymond, J. C., \&
460: Hartmann, L. 1987, \apj, 316, 323
461:
462: \bibitem[Hester \& Cox(1986)]{HC1986} Hester, J. J., \& Cox, D. P. 1986, \apj, 300, 675
463:
464: \bibitem[Hester, Raymond, \& Blair(1994)]{HRB1994} Hester, J. J., Raymond, J. C.,
465: \& Blair, W. P. 1994, \apj, 420, 721
466:
467: \bibitem[Huang \& Sarazin(1996)]{HS1996} Huang, Z., \& Sarazin, C. L. 1996, \apj, 461, 622
468:
469: \bibitem[Ku et al.(1984)]{Ku1984} Ku, W. H.-M., Kahn, S. M.,
470: Pisarski, R., \& Long, K. S. 1984, \apj, 278, 615
471:
472: \bibitem[Levenson et al.(1997)]{Levenson1997} Levenson, N. A., et al.~1997, \apj, 484, 304
473:
474: \bibitem[Levenson et al.(1998)]{Levenson1998} Levenson, N. A., Graham, J. R., Keller, L. D.,
475: \& Richter, M. J. 1998, \apjs, 118, 541
476:
477: \bibitem[Leahy, Roger, \& Ballantyne(1997)]{LRB1997} Leahy, D. A., Roger, R. S.,
478: \& Ballantyne, D. 1997, \apjs, 118, 541
479:
480: \bibitem[Leahy(2002)]{Leahy2002} Leahy, D. A. 2002, \aj, 123, 2689
481:
482: \bibitem[Leahy(2003)]{Leahy2003} Leahy, D. A. 2003, \apj, 586, 224
483:
484: \bibitem[Leahy(2004)]{Leahy2004} Leahy, D. A. 2004, \mnras, 351, 385
485:
486: \bibitem[Leahy(2005)]{Leahy2005} Leahy, D. A. 2005, \aj, 130, 165
487:
488: \bibitem[Long et al.(1992)]{Long1992} Long, K. S., Blair, W. P., Vancura, O.,
489: Bowers, C. W., Davidsen, A. F., \& Raymond, J. C. 1992, \apj, 400, 214
490:
491: \bibitem[Miller(1974)]{Miller1974} Miller, J. S.~1974, \apj, 189, 239
492:
493: \bibitem[McCray \& Snow(1979)]{MC1979} McCray, R., \& Snow, T. P., Jr. 1979, \araa, 17, 213
494:
495: \bibitem[Rasmussen \& Martin(1992)]{RM1992} Rasmussen, A., \& Martin, C.,
496: 1992, \apjl, 396, L103
497:
498: \bibitem[Raymond et al.(1980)]{Raymond1980} Raymond, J. C., Black, J. H., Dupree, A. K.,
499: Harmann, L., \& Wolff, R. S. 1980, \apj, 238, 881
500:
501: \bibitem[Raymond et al.(1981)]{Raymond1981} Raymond, J. C., Black, J. H., Dupree, A. K.,
502: Hartmann, L., \& Wolff, R. S. 1981, \apj, 246, 100
503:
504: \bibitem[Raymond et al.(1983)]{Raymond1983} Raymond, J. C., Blair, W. P., Fesen, R. A.,
505: Gull, T. R. 1983, \apj, 275, 636
506:
507: \bibitem[Raymond et al.(2001)]{Raymond2001} Raymond, J. C., Li., J., Blair, W. P.,
508: Cornett, R. H. 2001, \apj, 560, 763
509:
510: \bibitem[Sankrit et al.(2000)]{Sankrit2000} Sankrit, R., Blair, W. P., Raymond, J. C., \&
511: Long, K. S. 2000, \aj, 120, 1925
512:
513: \bibitem[Sankrit \& Blair(2002)]{Sankrit2002} Sankrit, R., \& Blair, W. P.~2002,
514: \apj, 565, 297
515:
516: \bibitem[Sankrit, Blair, \& Raymond(2003)]{Sankrit2003} Sankrit, R., Blair, W. P., \&
517: Raymond, J. C. 2003, \apj, 589, 242
518:
519: \bibitem[Sivia(1996)]{Sivia1996} Sivia, D. S 1996, Data Analysis,
520: A Bayesian Tutorial, (Clarendon Press: Oxford), pp37--52
521:
522: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(1978)]{Thompson1978} Thompson, G. I., Nandy, K., Jamar, C.,
523: Monfils, A., Houziaux, L., Carnochan, D. J., \& Wilson, R. 1978,
524: Catalogue of Stellar Ultraviolet Fluxes: A Compilation of Absolute Stellar Fluxes
525: Measured by the Sky Survey Telescope (S2/68) aboard the ESRO Satellite TD-1
526: (London: Science Research Council)
527:
528: \end{thebibliography}
529:
530: \clearpage
531:
532: \begin{figure}
533: \begin{center}
534: \includegraphics[scale=.5]{f1.eps}
535: \end{center}
536: \caption{
537: Contours of \ion{C}{4} ($\lambda\sim$ 1550\AA) emission intensity
538: are displayed over an H$\alpha$ image \citep{Levenson1998}
539: of the Cygnus Loop.
540: Thick solid lines identify characteristic features referred in the text.
541: Positions of the removed bright stars are indicated by dash lines.
542: } \label{fig1}
543: \end{figure}
544:
545: \clearpage
546:
547: \begin{figure}
548: \begin{center}
549: \includegraphics[scale=.4]{f2.eps}
550: \end{center}
551: \caption{The {\em SPEAR} L-channel spectra. Spectra of regions XA+NE cloud, Carrot+Wester cloud,
552: Diffuse interior, NE nonradiative are shown offset from each other.
553: Globally averaged spectrum is also shown.
554: The spectra are corrected for reddening.} \label{fig2}
555: \end{figure}
556:
557: \clearpage
558:
559: \begin{figure}
560: \begin{center}
561: \includegraphics[scale=.9]{f3.eps}
562: %\includegraphics[scale=.64]{f3b.eps}
563: %\includegraphics[scale=.64]{f3c.eps}
564: %\includegraphics[scale=.64]{f3d.eps}
565: \end{center}
566: \caption{{\em SPEAR} spectral line maps of the Cygnus Loop
567: in (a) \ion{C}{4} ($\lambda\lambda$ 1548, 1550\AA),
568: (b) \ion{O}{3}] ($\lambda\lambda$ 1661, 1667\AA), (c) \ion{He}{2} ($\lambda$ 1640\AA),
569: and (d) \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] ($\lambda\lambda$ 1400, 1403\AA, unresolved).
570: Coordinates are $\alpha , \delta$ of epoch 2000.0.
571: Units of color bars are 10$^{-6}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$.
572: Contour levels in units of 10$^{-6}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ are stepped by
573: 8 equal linear intervals, and range (a) from 7 to 55,
574: (b) from 6 to 40, (c) from 6 to 40, and (d) from 4 to 24.
575: The values are not corrected for reddening.
576: }
577: \label{fig3}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: \clearpage
581:
582: \begin{table}
583: \caption{Reddening corrected FUV line luminosities of regions
584: indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig1}. The line luminosities are in units of $10^{34}$
585: ergs s$^{-1}$ and calculated assuming 440 pc distance \citep{Blair1999}.
586: The \ion{C}{3}, \ion{O}{6}, and X-ray luminosities from
587: \citet{Blair1991} and \citet{Ku1984} are also scaled to the distance
588: for comparison.}
589: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
590: \tableline
591: \tableline
592: Species & Carrot+Western & XA+NE & Diffuse & NE Nonradiative & Global \\ \tableline
593: \ion{Si}{4}+\ion{O}{4}] (1400\AA) & 0.67$\pm$0.18 & 0.52$\pm$0.16 & 0.26$\pm$0.10 & & 6.6$\pm$0.6 \\
594: \ion{C}{4} (1550\AA) & 5.7$\pm$0.5 & 3.8$\pm$0.4 & 1.9$\pm$0.3 & 0.53$\pm$0.17 & 44.7$\pm$1.4 \\
595: \ion{He}{2} (1640\AA) & 0.54$\pm$0.17 & 0.21$\pm$0.12 & 0.34$\pm$0.12 & 0.15$\pm$0.09 & 6.8$\pm$0.6 \\
596: \ion{O}{3}] (1664\AA) & 0.88$\pm$0.24 & 0.55$\pm$0.20 & 0.35$\pm$0.14 & & 6.5$\pm$0.8 \\
597: \ion{C}{3} (980\AA) & & & & & 88.2 \\
598: \ion{O}{6} (1035\AA) & & & & & 150. \\
599: X-ray (0.1--4.0 keV) & & & & & 35.9 \\
600: \tableline
601: \end{tabular} \label{table1}
602: \end{table}
603:
604: \end{document}
605: