1:
2: % AA vers. 4.01, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: \documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
4: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aa} % for a referee version
5: %\documentclass[twocolumn]{aa}
6: %\documentclass{aa}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Radial velocity measurements of B stars in the Scorpius-Centaurus association}
11: \author{E.\,Jilinski\inst{1,2}, S. Daflon\inst{1}, K.\,Cunha \inst{1} and
12: R.\,de la Reza \inst{1} }
13:
14: \offprints{E.\,Jilinski, Observat\'orio Nacional/MCT, Rua Gal. Jose
15: Cristino 77, S\~ao Cristov\~ao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
16: e-mail: jilinski@on.br}
17:
18: \institute{Observat\'orio Nacional/MCT, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
19: \and
20: Main Astronomical Observatory, Pulkovo, St. Petersburg, Russia}
21:
22: \date{}
23:
24: \authorrunning{E.\,Jilinski et al.}
25:
26: \titlerunning{Radial velocities in the Sco-Cen association}
27:
28: \abstract{We derive single-epoch radial velocities for a sample of
29: 56 B-type stars members of the subgroups Upper Scorpius, Upper
30: Centaurus Lupus and Lower Centaurus Crux of the nearby Sco-Cen OB
31: association. The radial velocity measurements were obtained by
32: means of high-resolution echelle spectra via analysis of
33: individual lines. The internal accuracy obtained in the
34: measurements is estimated to be typically 2-3 km\,s$^{-1}$, but
35: depends on the projected rotational velocity of the target. Radial
36: velocity measurements taken for 2-3 epochs for the targets
37: HD120307, HD142990 and HD139365 are variable and confirm that they
38: are spectroscopic binaries, as previously identified in the
39: literature. Spectral lines from two stellar components are
40: resolved in the observed spectra of target stars HD133242,
41: HD133955 and HD143018, identifying them as spectroscopic binaries.
42: \keywords{stars: early-type - stars: binaries: spectroscopic -
43: stars:
44: kinematics - stars: radial velocities in open clusters and associations:
45: individual: Scorpius-Centaurus association. }
46: }
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \section{Introduction}
51:
52: The Scorpius-Centaurus association is the nearest association of
53: young OB stars to the Sun. Blaauw (1960, 1964) divided this
54: association into three stellar subgroups: Upper Scorpius (US),
55: Upper Centaurus Lupus (UCL) and Lower Centaurus Crux (LCC). LCC
56: and UCL have roughly similar ages of about $16-20$ Myr, while US
57: is younger with an estimated age of $\sim$ 5 Myr (Mamajek et
58: al.2002; Sartori et al. 2003). This complex OB association of
59: unbound stars is of great interest because, as recently shown, it
60: is related to the origins of nearby moving groups of low mass
61: post-T Tauri stars with ages around 10 Myr: the $\beta$ Pictoris
62: Moving Group, the TW Hydra association, and the $\eta$ and
63: $\epsilon$ Chamaleonis groups (Mamajek et al. 2000; Ortega et al.
64: 2000, 2004; Jilinski et al. 2005). In addition, the
65: Scorpius-Centaurus association also appears to be the source of a
66: large bubble of hot gas in which the Sun is plunged. All these
67: structures are believed to have been possibly triggered by
68: supernova explosions taking place in UCL and LCC during the last
69: ~13 Myr (Ma\'iz-Apell\'aniz 2001).
70:
71: The technique adopted for investigating the origins of the $\beta$
72: Pictoris Moving Group, for example, consists of tracing back the
73: 3-D stellar orbits of the members of these moving groups until
74: their main first orbits confinement was found, as well as the past
75: mean positions of LCC and UCL. This enabled, investigator not only
76: to determine the dynamical age of this moving group, but also to
77: investigate properties of their birth clouds (Ortega et al. 2002,
78: 2004). It is also possible to find the past positions of the
79: possible supernovae that triggered the formation of these groups
80: by tracing back the orbit of a runaway OB star, which could have
81: been the result of a supernova explosion in LCC or UCL (see, for
82: example, Hoogerwerf et al. 2001 and Vlemmings et al. 2004).
83:
84: While the past evolution of these moving groups of low mass stars
85: appears to be a relatively simple problem (as the dynamical ages
86: are not so old), the dynamical evolution of the older and more
87: numerous subgroups LCC and UCL appears to be more difficult. There
88: is the possibility of the presence of several generations of hot
89: stars during the mainstream of the OB association evolution
90: (Garmany 1994).
91: Substructure in LCC and UCL was found by de Bruijne (1999), based
92: on Hipparcos data. The formation of the younger US subgroup could
93: have been triggered by UCL some 6-8 Myr ago (Preibisch et al.
94: 2001). All these studies require reliable radial velocities in
95: order to calculate space velocities. In this paper we present
96: single-epoch radial velocity (RV) measurements for 56 B-type stars
97: members of LCC, UCL and US subgroups, to contribute to studies of
98: their dynamics so as to unravel their origins.
99:
100: \section{Observations and reduction}
101:
102: A sample of 56 B-type stars from the Scorpius-Centaurus
103: association was observed during observing runs in May 16-20 and
104: July 7, 2002, with the 1.52m telescope equipped with the FEROS
105: echelle spectrograph (Kaufer et al. 2000; resolving power
106: R=48,000, wavelength coverage between 3900 and 9200\AA.) with a
107: CCD detector at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) \footnote
108: {Observations obtained under the ON/ESO agreement}. The target
109: stars were selected from the list in Humphreys \& McElroy (1984)
110: and from the comprehensive study of OB associations based on
111: Hipparcos observations by de Zeeuw et al. (1999). The observed
112: targets are listed in Table~1. From this sample, according to de
113: Zeeuw et al. (1999), 15 targets are confirmed members of the LCC,
114: while 15 stars are members of the UCL and 11 stars are from the
115: US subgroup. For the remaining 15 stars in our sample, membership
116: to any of these subgroups was not certain.
117:
118: The spectra were reduced with the MIDAS reduction package and
119: consisted of the following standard steps: CCD bias correction,
120: flat-fielding, extraction, wavelength calibration, correction of
121: barycentric velocity, as well as spectrum rectification and
122: normalization. The one-dimensional spectra were then treated by
123: tasks in the NOAO/IRAF data package. The signal-to noise ratio
124: obtained in the observed spectra was typically larger than 100 and
125: typical exposure times varied between 300 seconds for the
126: brightest stars (V $\sim$ 3) and 1200 seconds for stars with V
127: $\sim$ 5. Typical spectra are shown in Figure~1 . The top panel
128: corresponds to the target star HD~122980 and the bottom panel to
129: HD~112092. Both stars have sharp lines with projected rotational
130: velocities ($v \sin i$) less than ~40 km\,s$^{-1}$. The spectral
131: region displayed shows identifications of several lines that were
132: used in the RV determinations. The FEROS bench spectrograph and
133: set up have proven to have high spectral stability for RV
134: measurements as concluded from a study of radial-velocity standard
135: stars: a r.m.s. of 21 m\,s$^{-1}$ has been obtained for a data set
136: of 130 individual measurements (Kaufer et al. 2000).
137:
138: \section{Analysis and discussion}
139:
140: The cross-correlation technique, which is used for precise RV
141: determinations in later type stars, when applied to the hotter OB
142: stars can be problematic as early type star spectra show few
143: absorption lines. These lines are in many cases, intrinsically
144: broad (up to a few hundreds km\,s$^{-1}$) due to stellar rotation.
145: In addition, there is also the possibility of line variability
146: affecting their line profiles (Steenbrugge et al. 2003).
147: Therefore, the cross-correlation peak that defines the value of
148: radial velocity can be very broad and contain important
149: sub-structures caused by blending of spectral lines that appear to
150: have different widths. In addition to having high $v \sin i$
151: values many OB stars are binary and it is not straightforward to
152: apply the cross-correlation method and to identify them as
153: double-lined binaries; in order to obtain the orbital solution a
154: long set of observations is needed. Detailed cross-correlation
155: technique analyses applied to determinations of radial velocities
156: of early-type stars has been presented in a number of recent
157: publications (see, for example, Verschueren et al. 1997;
158: Verschueren et al. 1999a; Griffin et al. 2000). Griffin et al.
159: (2000), in particular, discuss in detail the difficulties in
160: obtaining accurate RV measurements from cross-correlation in
161: early-type stars spectra.
162:
163: In this study, having high-resolution observations covering a
164: large spectral range, radial velocity values for the target stars
165: were obtained from measurements of the positions of individual
166: spectral lines of He I, C II, N II, O II, Mg II, Si II and Si III,
167: relative to their rest wavelengths. Radial-velocity standard stars
168: were not observed. (The adopted linelists can be found in Daflon
169: et al. 2001, 2003.) We inspected and identified all unblended
170: lines visible in the spectral range between 3798 \AA\ (H\,{\sc i})
171: and 7065 \AA\ (He\,{\sc i}) in each target star: the number of
172: measurable lines varied between 10 and 74, depending on the star
173: spectral type, rotation velocity, possible multiplicity, but also
174: on the signal-to-noise of the obtained spectra. (We note, however,
175: that for the double lined binary HD 133242, it was possible to
176: measure positions only for 4 lines in component A and 6 lines in
177: component B.) Mean radial velocities using all measurable lines
178: (${\rm RV}$) and respective dispersions were calculated for the
179: individual target stars.
180:
181: In Table~1 we assemble our RV results as well as results from the
182: literature. In the two first columns of this table we list the HD
183: numbers of the observed stars with the respective spectral types;
184: in the columns 3 and 4 we list the heliocentric Julian Date (HJD)
185: and the measured radial velocities, plus the number of measured
186: lines in brackets. In the other columns we list results from the
187: literature: columns 5 and 6 list the RV$_{\rm GCRV}$ and
188: associated error or quality, from the General Catalogue of Radial
189: Velocities (GCRV; quality flags A to E, or I for insufficient
190: data); column 7 presents the projected rotational velocity from
191: Brown \& Verschueren (1997) and, when not available in this
192: source, the $v\,sin i$ was taken from the compilation of Glebocki
193: \& Stawikowski (2000); in column 9 we list, when available,
194: literature references where information about duplicity can be
195: found for the stars. The stars are separated according to the
196: different subgroups in the Scorpius-Centaurus association,
197: following the membership probabilities P(m) listed by de Zeeuw et
198: al. (1999).
199:
200: The internal precision of our RV determinations can be represented
201: by the scatter obtained from the RV measurements line-by-line,
202: which is listed in column 4 of Table 1. These are typically
203: smaller than $\sim$2.0 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ for stars with estimated
204: $v\,sin i$ smaller than 100 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$. We note, however,
205: that when the target $v\,sin i$ are large, the uncertainties in
206: the derived RVs can be significantly larger due to uncertainties
207: in defining the line center. This can be seen in Figure~2, where
208: we show the obtained line-to-line scatter versus the target
209: projected rotational velocity (as taken from Brown \& Verschueren
210: 1997 and Glebocki \& Stawikowski 2000).
211:
212: In order to evaluate possible systematic effects that line
213: selection could have on the RV results, we selected a homogeneous
214: set of 28 spectral lines of H\,{\sc i}, He\,{\sc i}, Si\,{\sc
215: iii} and Mg\,{\sc ii}, that could be measured in most of the
216: studied spectra, and recalculated the mean radial velocity values
217: for all possible stars. A comparison of the mean radial velocities
218: ${\rm RV}$ with ${\rm RV}_{\rm 28lines}$ (obtained using only the
219: selected 28 lines) indicates that there are non-significant
220: systematic differences between the two determinations ${\rm RV} -
221: \, {\rm RV}_{\rm 28lines}= -1.0 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$, with $\sigma =
222: 3.1 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$.
223:
224: \subsection{Membership}
225:
226: Table~1 lists the target stars according to their membership the 3
227: subgroups as assigned by de Zeeuw et al. (1999). Most of the stars
228: in the Lower Centaurus Crux subgroup are flagged as binaries in
229: the literature, except for HD103079, HD106490 and HD108483. For
230: these 3 stars we measured radial velocities of $19.3 {\rm
231: km\,s}^{-1}$, $15.3 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ and $12.8 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$,
232: respectively, with RV$_{mean}$=15.8 $\pm$3.2 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$.
233: This mean value is in general agreement with the mean radial
234: velocity calculated by de Zeeuw et al. (1999) for LCC, which is of
235: $12 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$. For the subgroup UCL, our sample has 2
236: non-binary stars (HD121790 and HD128345) and RV$_{mean}$=$9.6
237: {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ which is $\sim 5 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ higher than
238: the de Zeeuw et al. (1999) mean value of $4.9 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$.
239: For the Upper Scorpius subgroup all the sample stars have been
240: flagged as binaries in the literature.
241:
242: For the five target stars that had not been identified as members
243: of any of the three subgroups in the Sco-Cen association (listed
244: as "others" in Table~1) and for which we have no information on
245: duplicity, we can attempt to discuss their membership status based
246: on the comparison of the radial velocities measured here and in
247: the literature. We find that the measured radial velocities for
248: HD109026 (RV=4.0 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$) and HD110335 (RV= 4.8 ${\rm
249: km\,s}^{-1}$) are consistent with the mean radial velocity for UCL
250: of 4.9 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$s. For the target star HD109026 we have
251: RV$_{GCRV}$= 2.5 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$, therefore it could be
252: considered initially as having constant RV (within the
253: uncertainties) and possibly a member of the Upper Centaurus Lupus
254: subgroup. For HD110335, we find a larger discrepancy between our
255: measurement (RV=4.8 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$) and the RV value in the
256: GCRV (RV$_{GCRV}$=12.5 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$). The RVs, however, are
257: marginally consistent given the expected uncertainty brackets that
258: affect the 2 determinations. If this is really the case, HD110335
259: could be also considered as a possible member of the UCL subgroup.
260: In addition, the target star HD120640 (RV$_{mean}$=-1.8 ${\rm
261: km\,s}^{-1}$ from this study and RV$_{GCRV}$=-4.7 ${\rm
262: km\,s}^{-1}$) can be assumed here to have constant radial
263: velocity. These measurements are consistent with the mean RV value
264: of -4.6 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ listed by de Zeeuw et al. (1999) for
265: this subgroup.
266:
267: The two other stars in our sample of 'others' (HD115846 and
268: HD105937) for which we derived RV= -21.8 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ and
269: RV=22.7 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$, respectively, have values in the GCRV
270: of RV$_{GCRV}$=3.0 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ and RV$_{GCRV}$=15.0 ${\rm
271: km\,s}^{-1}$. We found no information in the literature about
272: these stars being confirmed binary stars, but the variation in RV
273: for HD115846 exceeds the expected uncertainties: this target
274: probably has a non-constant RV, which prevents further
275: considerations about it belonging to any of the Sco-Cen subgroups.
276: HD105937 has an RV only marginally constant within the
277: uncertainties, but its mean RV is not compatible with any of the
278: subgroups.
279:
280: \subsection{Duplicity}
281:
282: Results from a search for duplicity information for the targets
283: stars (column 9; Table~1) indicate that a large number of stars in
284: our sample are flagged as binaries in the literature. For most of
285: these targets we have only one single-epoch RV measurement and our
286: results alone cannot be used to infer duplicity. However, the RVs
287: derived in this study can be added to RV databases and contribute
288: to long term studies of their orbits. Only a small number of stars
289: had not been previously flagged as binaries in the different
290: studies in the literature. For this subsample of 10 stars,
291: considered a priori as RV constants, it is possible to compare our
292: RV values with the averaged radial velocities assembled in the
293: GCRV. This comparison is shown in Figure~3. Our RV determinations
294: compare favorably with the RVs from the GCRV with a scatter of the
295: order of the estimated uncertainties. ${\rm RV}_{\rm GCRV} - {\rm
296: RV} = 0.7$ and $\sigma = 4.9 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$. (This was
297: calculated excluding one discrepant star, HD115846, which could be
298: a binary system.) Taking into account the mean precision of RV
299: determinations from the GCRV as $\pm 5 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$, the
300: external precision of our RV determinations may be evaluated as
301: approximately $\pm 5 {\rm km\,s}^{-1}$.
302:
303:
304: For those targets with more than one epoch RV measurement in our
305: study, a subsample showed radial velocity variations larger than
306: the expected uncertainties: HD120307, HD142990 and HD139365. Since
307: these had been previously identified as SBs in the literature
308: (Levato et al. 1987 and Batten et al. 1989), our results confirm
309: their duplicity. Four other stars with multiple epoch observations
310: in this study showed a constant RV within the uncertainties:
311: HD116087, HD130807, HD132200 and HD120640.
312:
313: For 3 targets in our sample (HD133242, HD133955 and HD143018) we
314: were able to separate and identify lines of two stellar
315: components, classifying them as double lined spectroscopic
316: binaries. Their combined spectra showing spectral lines from two
317: stars are shown in Fig~4. Two of these stars (HD143018 and
318: HD133955) were previously identified in Batten et al. (1999) as a
319: spectroscopic binaries.
320:
321:
322: \begin{acknowledgements}
323: We thank the anonymous referee for suggestions that significantly
324: improved the paper. E.G.J. thanks FAPERJ and MCT Brazil for
325: financial support.
326: \end{acknowledgements}
327:
328: \begin{thebibliography}{}
329: \bibitem[2000]{bbf00}
330: Barbier-Brossat, M. \& Figon, P. 2000, A\&AS, 142, 217
331: \bibitem[1989]{bat89}
332: Batten, A. H., Fletcher, J. M., \& MacCarthy, D. G. 1989,
333: Publications of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, 17, 1
334: \bibitem[1960]{bla1}
335: Blaauw, A. 1960, Present Problems Concerning the Structure
336: and Evolution of the Galactic System, ed. J. H. Oort \& H. G. Quik
337: (Nuffic Intern. Summer Course, vol. 3)
338: \bibitem[1964]{bla2}
339: Blaauw, A. 1964, ARA\&A 2, 213
340: \bibitem[1997]{bro97}
341: Brown, A. G. A. \& Verschueren, W. 1997, A\&A 319, 811
342: \bibitem[1999]{bru99}
343: de Bruijne, Jos H. J. 1999, MNRAS 310, 585
344: \bibitem[1999]{zee99}
345: de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A. \&
346: Blaauw, A. 1999, AJ 117, 354
347: \bibitem[2001]{daf01}
348: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., Becker, S., \& Smith, V. V. 2001 ApJ, 563, 325
349: \bibitem[2003]{daf03}
350: Daflon, S., Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., \& Butler, K. 2003, A\&A, 399, 525
351: \bibitem[2000]{dom00}
352: Dommanget, J. \& Nys, O. 2000, A\&A 363, 991
353: \bibitem[1994]{gar94}
354: Garmany, C. 1994, PASP 106, 25
355: \bibitem[2000]{gle00}
356: Glebocki, R., \& Stawikowski, A. 2000, A\&A 50, 509
357: \bibitem[2000]{gri00}
358: Griffin, R. E. M., David, M. \& Verschueren, W. 2000, AAS 1407, 299
359: \bibitem[2001]{hoo01}
360: Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J. \& de Zeeuw, P. T. 2001, A\&A 365, 49
361: \bibitem[1984]{hum84}
362: Humphreys, R. M. \& McElroy, D. B. 1984, ApJ 284, 565
363: \bibitem[2005]{jil05}
364: Jilinski, E., Ortega V. G. \& de la Reza, R. 2005, ApJ 619, 945
365: \bibitem[2000]{kau00}
366: Kaufer, A., Stahl, O., Tubbesing, S., Norregaard, P., Avila, G.,
367: Francois, P., Pasquini, L. \& Pizzella, A. 2000, Proc. SPIE V. 4008, 459
368: \bibitem[1987]{lev87}
369: Levato, H. Malaroda, S., Morrell, N., Solivella, G., 1987, ApJS, 64, 487
370: \bibitem[2001]{mai01}
371: Ma\'iz-Apell\'aniz, 2001, ApJ 560, L83
372: \bibitem[2002]{mam02}
373: Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R. \& Liebert, J. 2002, AJ 124, 1670
374: \bibitem[2000]{mam00}
375: Mamajek, E. E., Lawson, W. A. \& Feigelson, E. D. 2000, ApJ 544, 356
376: \bibitem[2002]{ort02}
377: Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E. \& Bazzanella, B. 2002, ApJ 575, L75
378: \bibitem[2004]{ort04}
379: Ortega, V. G., de la Reza, R., Jilinski, E. \& Bazzanella, B. 2004, ApJ 609, 243
380: \bibitem[2001]{pre01}
381: Preibisch, T., Guenther, E. \& Zinnecker, H. 2001, AJ 121, 1040.
382: \bibitem[2003]{sar03}
383: Sartori, M. J., Lepine, J. R. D. \& Dias, W. S. 2003, A\&A 404, 913
384: \bibitem[2003]{ste03}
385: Steenbrugge, K. C., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Hoogerwerf, R. \& de Zeeuw, P. T. 2003, A\&A 402, 587
386: \bibitem[2002]{sha02}
387: Shatsky, N. \& Tokovinin, A. 2002, A\&A 382, 92
388: \bibitem[1997]{ver97}
389: Verschueren, W., Brown, A. G. A., Hensberge, H., David, M., Le Poole, R. S., de Geus, E. J.,
390: \& de Zeeuw, P. T. 1997, PASP 109, 868
391: \bibitem[1999]{ver99a}
392: Verschueren, W., David, M. \& Griffin, R. E. M. 1999, A\&AS 140, 107
393: \bibitem[2004]{vle04}
394: Vlemmings, W. H. T., Cordes, J. M., \& Chatteriee, S. 2004, ApJ 610, 402
395: \end{thebibliography}{}
396:
397: %%%%%% TABLE
398: %%%%%% TABLE
399:
400: \newpage
401:
402: \begin{table}
403: \begin{center}
404: \begin{tabular}{llcrcccc}
405: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Table 1. Radial velocities of observed Sco-Cen OB stars}\\
406: \hline
407: \hline
408: \,\,\, HD &\,\,\,\,Sp& HJD &RV\,[N]\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,& RV$_{\rm GCRV}$\,\,\, & eRV* & V$\sin$ i & Duplicity \\
409: & & & (km\,s$^{-1}$)\,\,\,\,\,\, & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & \\
410: \hline
411: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Lower Centaurus Crux} \\
412: \,\,\,98718&B5Vn & 52411.0285 & 26.8$\pm$2.7 [19] & 9.4 & C & 340$^a$ & ST \\
413: 103079 & B4V & 52411.0425 & 19.3$\pm$1.0 [58] & 20.6 & B & 47$^b$ & \\
414: 105382 & B6IIIe & 52413.0429 & 15.8$\pm$1.1 [50] & 16.4 & B & 75$^b$ & ST \\
415: 106490 & B2IV & 52413.0617 & 15.3$\pm$1.5 [35] & 22.0 & B & 135$^b$ & \\
416: 106983 & B2.5V & 52411.0787 & 12.1$\pm$0.8 [50] & 15.8 & A & 65$^b$ & VDH \\
417: 108257 & B3Vn & 52411.0875 & 19.9$\pm$2.7 [19] & 5.0 & C & 298$^b$ & VDH \\
418: 108483 & B2V & 52411.1008 & 12.8$\pm$1.4 [29] & 8.0 & C & 169$^b$ & \\
419: 109668 & B2IV-V & 52411.1127 & $-$0.1$\pm$1.4 [38] & 13.0 & C & 114$^b$ & ST \\
420: 110879 & B2.5V & 52411.1177 & 56.9$\pm$2.5 [33] & 42.0 & D & 139$^b$ & VDH \\
421: 110956 & B3V & 52411.1229 & 15.6$\pm$0.7 [69] & 16.4 & B & 26$^b$ & VDH \\
422: 112091 & B5Vne & 52411.1449 & 15.9$\pm$1.9 [19] & 13.0 & C & 242$^b$ &VDH\\
423: 112092 & B2IV-V & 52411.1389 & 14.4$\pm$0.6 [72] & 13.9 & A & 34$^b$ & VDH \\
424: 113703 & B5V & 52415.1623 & 1.2$\pm$1.4 [29] & 6.0 & C & 140$^b$ & VDH,ST \\
425: 113791 & B1.5V & 52411.1615 & 58.5$\pm$0.8 [72] & 14.3 & C & 15$^b$ & SB8 \\
426: 116087 & B3V & 52411.2216 & 12.3$\pm$1.6 [21] & 6.0 & C & 233$^b$ & VDH,ST \\
427: & & 52414.1034 & 9.4$\pm$3.9 [10] & & & & \\
428: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Upper Centaurus Lupus} \\
429: 120307 & B2IV & 52413.1160 & 25.4$\pm$0.9 [54] & 9.1 & & 65$^b$ & SB8,L87\\
430: & & 52413.1562 & 7.4$\pm$0.8 [39] & & & & \\
431: & & 52414.1143 & 11.0$\pm$0.7 [31] & & & & \\
432: 121743 & B2IV & 52414.1453 & 9.6$\pm$0.8 [57] & 5.3 & 1.4 & 79$^b$ & L87\\
433: 121790 & B2IV-V & 52414.1523 & 9.2$\pm$1.4 [35] & 4.8 & B & 124$^b$ & \\
434: 122980 & B2V & 52414.1594 & 10.5$\pm$0.6 [74] & 9.6 & 2.8 & 15$^b$ & L87 \\
435: 128345 & B5V & 52414.1828 & 9.9$\pm$1.9 [25] & 8.0 & D & 186$^b$ & \\
436: 129056 & B1.5III& 52414.1909 & 18.3$\pm$0.8 [72] & 5.4 & 0.6 & 16$^b$ & VDH\\
437: 130807 & B5IV & 52414.1957 & 7.1$\pm$0.6 [67] & 7.3 & A & 27$^b$ & VDH,ST\\
438: & & 52414.2150 & 7.2$\pm$0.5 [56] & & & & \\
439: 132200 & B2IV & 52414.2097 & 4.6$\pm$0.6 [70] & 8.0 & 0.9 & 32$^b$ &VDH,L87,ST\\
440: & & 52414.2266 & 4.9$\pm$0.6 [55] & & & & \\
441: 133242A\,& B5IV & 52414.2599 &$-$52.5$\pm$0.7 [4] & 4.5 & C & 140$^a$ & VDH\\
442: 133242B\,& & & 81.5$\pm$2.1 [6] & & & & \\
443: 133955A\,& B3V & 52414.2696 & 61.2$\pm$1.4 [10] & 9.8 & B & 135$^b$ & SB8\\
444: 133955B\,& & &$-$31.6$\pm$1.0 [10] & & & & \\
445: 134687 & B3IV & 52414.2777 & 23.7$\pm$0.8 [74] & 13.5 & D & 13$^b$ & SB8 \\
446: 136504 & B2IV-V & 52414.2904 & $-$5.7$\pm$1.1 [60] & 7.9 & C & 41$^b$ & SB8,ST \\
447: 137432 & B4Vp & 52414.2976 & 6.3$\pm$1.0 [41] & $-$0.8 & E & 77$^b$ & VDH,SB8 \\
448: 139365 & B2.5V & 52414.1535 & 33.3$\pm$2.3 [23] &$-$14.0 & E & 134$^b$ & SB8 \\
449: & & 52414.3140 & $-$5.8$\pm$1.1 [25] & & & & \\
450: 140008 & B5V & 52414.3210 & 2.6$\pm$0.8 [56] & 3.9 & B & 11$^b$ & SB8,ST \\
451: \hline
452: \end{tabular}
453: \end{center}
454: \end{table}
455:
456: \begin{table}
457: \begin{center}
458: \begin{tabular}{llcrcccc}
459: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Table 1. Continued} \\
460: \hline
461: \hline
462: \,\,\, HD &\,\,\,\,Sp& HJD &RV\,[N]\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,& RV$_{\rm GCRV}$\,\,\, & eRV* & V $\sin$ i & Duplicity \\
463: & & & (km\,s$^{-1}$)\,\,\,\,\,\, & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & \\
464: \hline
465: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Upper Ssorpius} \\
466: 142669 & B2IV-V & 52415.2944 & 2.5$\pm$1.0 [41] & 3.3 & E & 98$^b$ & SB8 \\
467: 142883 & B3V & 52415.3002 &$-$54.3$\pm$0.5 [70] &$-$27.5 & E & 14$^b$ & SB8 \\
468: 142990 & B5V & 52481.0065 & $-$5.6$\pm$3.5 [33] &$-$12.1 & 3.4 & 178$^b$ & L87 \\
469: & & 52481.1270 &$-$10.9$\pm$2.9 [34] & & & & \\
470: 143018A\,& B1V+ & 52414.3559 & 113.8$\pm$2.8 [25] &$-$11.7 & D & 100$^b$ & SB8 \\
471: 143018B\,& & &$-$173.6$\pm$3.2 [21]& & & & \\
472: 144217 & B0.5V & 52414.3646 & 9.1$\pm$1.3 [43] & $-$1.0 & & 91$^b$ &SB8,VDH,L87,ST\\
473: 144470 & B1V & 52415.2873 & $-$0.6$\pm$1.1 [39] & $-$4.4 & 3.0 & 100$^b$ & L87 \\
474: 147165 & B1III & 52414.3498 &$-$25.6$\pm$1.2 [50] & 2.5 & & 56$^b$ &SB8,L87,ST\\
475: 147888 & B3/B4V & 52481.1481 & $-$3.8$\pm$2.3 [27] & $-$6.8 & 2.9 & 175$^a$ & L87 \\
476: 147932 & B5V & 52481.2006 & $-$2.8$\pm$2.7 [23] &$-$11.0 & 2.4 & 186$^a$ & L87 \\
477: 148184 & B2Vne & 52481.1797 & $-$4.7$\pm$2.1 [34] &$-$19.0 & & 148$^b$ &SB8,L87\\
478: 149438 & B0V & 52414.3446 & 1.6$\pm$0.8 [43] & 1.7 & 0.8 & 10$^b$ & L87 \\
479: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Other} \\
480: 104841 & B2IV & 52411.0594 & $-$8.9$\pm$0.5 [73] & 16.1 & I & 25$^b$ & SB8 \\
481: 105435 & B2IVne & 52411.0725 & 3.8$\pm$2.8 [15] & 11.0 & C & 298$^b$ & VDH\\
482: 105937 & B3V & 52413.0558 & 22.7$\pm$1.5 [33] & 15.0 & C & 129$^b$ & \\
483: 109026 & B5V & 52411.1069 & 4.0$\pm$1.6 [31] & 2.5 & D & 188$^b$ & \\
484: 110335 & B6IVe & 52481.0996 & 4.8$\pm$1.8 [23] & 12.5 & B & 250$^a$ & \\
485: 111123 & B0.5IV & 52411.1357 & 9.8$\pm$0.7 [53] & 10.3 & A & 40$^b$ & VDH\\
486: 115846 & B3IV & 52481.97 &$-$21.8$\pm$1.6 [27] & 3.0 & 4.0 & 168$^b$ & \\
487: 116072 & B2.5Vn & 52411.1714 & 18.8$\pm$2.5 [21] & 3.0 & C & 233$^b$ & VDH\\
488: 118716 & B1III & 52413.1107 & 14.0$\pm$1.2 [32] & 3.0 & B & 114$^b$ & VDH\\
489: 120640 & B2Vp & 52413.1209 & $-$2.1$\pm$0.8 [63] & $-$4.7 & 0.8 & 21$^b$ & \\
490: & & 52414.1219 & $-$1.5$\pm$0.6 [49] & & & & \\
491: 126341 & B2IV & 52414.1712 &$-$21.1$\pm$1.0 [73] &$-$21.5 & B & 15$^b$ & VDH \\
492: 132058 & B2III & 52414.2050 & 0.1$\pm$1.0 [48] & 0.2 & 0.9 & 92$^b$ & L87 \\
493: 132955 & B3V & 52414.2424 & 5.1$\pm$0.5 [70] & 3.7 & 2.1 & 8$^b$ & VDH \\
494: 144218 & B2V & 52414.3716 & 0.6$\pm$0.8 [57] & $-$5.6 & 0.8 & 56$^b$ &VDH,L87,ST,SB8\\
495: 151985 & B2IV & 52414.3352 & 1.9$\pm$0.7 [56] & 1.3 & 0.7 & 52$^b$ & L87,SB8 \\
496: \hline
497: \end{tabular}
498: \end{center}
499: \begin{list}{}{}
500: \item * A: errors $\le$ 2.5 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$; B: 2.5 $<$ errors $\le$ 5.0 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$;
501: C: 5.0 $<$ errors $\le$ 10.0 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$;
502: D: errors $\ge$ 10 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$;
503: E: too uncertain (from Table 3 of Barbier-Brossat \& Figon \cite{bbf00})
504: \item a: from Glebocki \& Stawikowski (\cite{gle00}) and
505: b: from Brown \& Verschueren (\cite{ver97})
506: \item SB8 - Eighth Orbital Elements of Spectroscopic Binaries (Batten et al. \cite{bat89})
507: \item L87 - Levato et al. (1987)
508: \item VDH - Visual Double Stars in Hipparcos (Dommanget \& Nys \cite{dom00})
509: \item ST - Shatsky \& Tokovinin (2002)
510: \end{list}
511: \end{table}
512:
513:
514:
515: %%%%%% FIGURES
516:
517: \begin{figure}
518: \centering
519: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\textwidth]{spectra.eps}
520: \caption{Sample spectra for two target stars. The top panel shows
521: HD122980 and the bottom panel shows HD112092. The lines appearing
522: in this spectral region are identified. } \label{spectra}
523: \end{figure}
524:
525:
526: \begin{figure}
527: \centering
528: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=\textwidth]{dvrvs.eps}
529: \caption{The dependance of the internal r.m.s. errors of our
530: radial velocity determinations on the star's projected rotational
531: velocities ($v \sin i$) taken from Brown \& Verschueren (1997) and
532: Glebocki \& Stawikowski (2000).} \label{vrvseni}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: \begin{figure}
536: \centering
537: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=\textwidth]{complit.eps}
538: \caption{A Comparison between the radial velocities derived in
539: this study with previously determined radial velocities from the
540: GCRV (Barbier-Brossat \& Figon 2000). The targets shown are those
541: stars from our sample considered to be single stars. The adopted
542: error bars for this study are the sigmas listed in column 4 of
543: Table 1. The adopted error bars from the GCRV were calculated as
544: the mean value of the range of uncertainties in RV corresponding
545: to the quality flags A-D (listed in Table~1). For those stars with
546: RV quality A and D we adopted uncertainties of 2.5 ${\rm
547: km\,s}^{-1}$ and 10 ${\rm km\,s}^{-1}$, respectively. The x=y line
548: representing perfect agreement is shown for comparison. The very
549: discrepant point at (-21.8,3.0) represents the target star
550: HD115846, which could be an unsuspected binary. } \label{vlit}
551: \end{figure}
552:
553: \begin{figure}
554: \centering
555: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\textwidth]{SB.eps}
556: \caption{Sample spectra of the double lined spectroscopic binaries
557: HD133242, HD133955 and HD143018 showing the lines 4471\AA \ of He I
558: and 4481\AA \ of Mg II.}
559: \label{sb2}
560: \end{figure}
561:
562: \end{document}
563: