1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \def\am{$^{\prime}$}
3: \def\arcsec{$^{\prime\prime}$}
4: \def\msol{M$_{\odot}$}
5: \def\deg{^{\circ}}
6:
7: \shorttitle{The 3.5-h period in V382 Vel and the Long Term Light Curve}
8: \shortauthors{Balman \c{S}. et al.}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{The Detection of a 3.5-h Period in the Classical Nova Velorum 1999
12: (V382 Vel) and the Long Term Behavior of the Nova Light Curve
13: }
14: \author{ \c{S}\"olen Balman\altaffilmark{1,2}, Alon Retter\altaffilmark{3},
15: Marc Bos\altaffilmark{4}
16: \altaffiltext{1} {Middle East Technical University, In\"on\"u Bulvar{\i}, Ankara, Turkey, 06531; solen@astroa.physics.metu.edu.tr}
17: \altaffiltext{2} {Astrophysics Missions Division, Research and Scientific Support Department of
18: ESA, ESTEC, Postbus 299 SCI-SA, Keplerlaan 1 2201 AZ Noorwijk ZH, The Netherlands}
19: \altaffiltext{3} {Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State
20: University, 525 Davey Lab., University Park, PA 16802, USA}
21: \altaffiltext{4} {Mount Molehill Observatory, Auckland, NZ}}
22: \begin{abstract}
23:
24: We present CCD photometry, light curve and time series analysis
25: of the classical nova V382 Vel (N Vel 1999). The source was observed
26: for 2 nights in 2000, 21 nights in 2001 and 7 nights in 2002 using clear filters.
27: We report the detection of a distinct period in the
28: light curve of the nova P=0.146126(18) d (3.5 h).
29: The period is evident in all data sets,
30: and we interpret it as the binary period of the system.
31: We also measured an increase in the amplitude modulation of the optical light (in magnitude) by more than
32: 55$\%$ from 2000 to 2001 and about 64$\%$ from 2001 to 2002.
33: The pulse profiles in 2001 show deviations from a pure sinusoidal shape which progressively
34: become more sinusoidal by 2002. The main cause of the variations in 2001 and 2002 can be
35: explained with the occultation of the accretion disk by the secondary star.
36: We interpret the observed deviations from a pure
37: sinusoidal shape as additional flux resulting from the aspect variations of the irradiated
38: face of the secondary star.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords
43: {Stars: cataclysmic variables, novae -- Individual: V382 Vel -- binaries:
44: close -- accretion, accretion disks -- white dwarfs }
45:
46: \section{INTRODUCTION}
47:
48: A classical nova outburst arises from the explosive ignition of
49: accreted matter
50: (i.e., thermo-nuclear runaway, TNR) in a cataclysmic binary system
51: where a Roche-lobe filling secondary transfers hydrogen rich
52: material typically via an
53: accretion disk onto the white dwarf (WD) primary.
54: During the outburst, the envelope of the WD expands to $\sim$ 100
55: R$_{\odot}$ and 10$^{-7}$ to 10$^{-3}$\ M$_{\odot}$ of material
56: that exceeds the escape velocity is expelled
57: from the system (Shara 1989; Warner 1995; Starrfield 2002).
58: The outburst stage usually lasts from a few
59: months to several years and finally, the system returns to a quiescent
60: state after the outburst.
61:
62: Nova Vel 1999 (V382 Vel) was discovered on 1999, May 20.6 UT
63: (Lee at al. 1999). It is believed to be an
64: outburst on an ONeMg white dwarf because of the strong Ne line emission
65: detected in the optical wavelengths (Woodward et al. 1999).
66: Spectroscopic observations from 5 to 498 days (after the eruption) indicate that
67: the nova belongs to a broad Fe II spectroscopic class with an absolute magnitude
68: at the optical maximum M$_v$$\sim$-8.9, t$_2$=6 d and t$_3$=10 d
69: (Della Valle et al. 2002). The early evolution of the nova shows
70: an iron curtain phase and P-Cygni profiles on all the important resonance lines
71: with expansion velocities between 2000-4000 km s$^{-1}$ (see Shore et al. 2003 and
72: Della Valle et al. 2002 for the optical and Burwitz et al. 2002
73: for the X-ray wavelengths).
74: Fragmentation in the ejecta is apparent and the ejected mass is calculated to be
75: 4-5$\times$10$^{-4}$ M$_{\odot}$. The nova is
76: found to be enhanced in Ne/Ne$_{\odot}$=17($\pm$3), N/N$_{\odot}$=17($\pm$4),
77: C/C$_{\odot}$=0.6($\pm$0.3), Al/Al$_{\odot}$=21($\pm$2), and Mg/Mg$_{\odot}$=2.6($\pm$0.1)
78: (Shore et al. 2003). The distance to the nova is estimated as 1.7-2.5 kpc (Della Valle et al. 2002;
79: Shore et al. 2003).
80: In addition, Nova Vel 1999 appeared as a Super Soft X-ray
81: Source (Orio et al. 2002; Ness et al. 2005) and the hard X-ray emission
82: was detected originating
83: from the shock heated material in the shell (Orio et al. 2001; Mukai $\&$ Ishida 2001;
84: Burwitz et al. 2002; Ness et al. 2005)
85:
86: Bos et al. (2002) discovered a 3.5-h periodicity;
87: 0.14615(1) d together with its second harmonic in the optical light curve of the nova.
88: In this paper, we will elaborate
89: that report, discuss possible physical mechanisms for the variation and
90: try to understand the characteristics of the long term
91: light curve and the detected period.
92:
93:
94: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
95:
96: We observed V382 Vel during 2 nights in 2000, 21 nights in 2001 and
97: 7 nights in 2002 through clear filters. Table 1 displays the summary
98: of the observation schedule. The observations in 2000 were obtained with
99: a 0.25 m (Meade) telescope
100: at the Wharemaru Observatory, New Zealand with a ST6 CCD Camera.
101: The photometry in 2001 and 2002 was carried out using
102: the 0.3 m telescope at the Molehill Observatory with the ST6b CCD Camera, Auckland, New Zealand.
103: The typical exposure times were 20 s in 2000, and 45-60 s in 2001 and 2002. Also, three nights
104: in January 2001 were obtained at the 0.75 m telescope of the Sutherland,
105: South African Observatory using a UCT CCD photometer.
106:
107: Before carrying out the photometric measurements, standard noise reduction
108: was applied to the images and the bias and flat corrections were made.
109: Aperture photometry was performed on the corrected and normalized images.
110: A reference group of three comparison stars, close to the nova, in the same field
111: were used in order to reduce the scintillation effects and derive the relative magnitudes.
112: In Figure 1, we indicate the times of our obseravtions with arrows in a plot of the light curve
113: obtained by the AAVSO covering data from the initial outburst to 2003.
114:
115: \section{DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}
116:
117: Using our reduced and calibrated data,
118: we constructed light curves for the given nights in Table 1.
119: A collection of normalized light curves obtained from the
120: longer runs are displayed on Figure 2 for 2000, 2001, and
121: 2002. The observational dates are indicated on each panel of the figure.
122: A modulation of the light curve can be seen in all nights.
123: The typical errors of the data points (in magnitudes) are 0$^m$.03
124: for 2000, 0$^m$.014 for 2001 and 0$^m$.013 for 2002 as calculated from the
125: standard deviation of the magnitudes of the stars chosen as reference to
126: calculate the differential magnitudes.
127:
128: We performed Fourier analysis on the
129: time series obtained from the data in order to derive the period of the
130: modulations using the ESO-MIDAS (European Southern Observatory Munich Image Data Analysis System)
131: time series analysis package.
132: Several standard programs were used
133: like the Scargle Algorithim (Scargle 1982) and Discrete Fourier
134: Analysis using Leahy normalization (Leahy et al. 1983).
135: Figure 3, top panel, shows the power spectrum of the data
136: for the year 2000 where the Scargle algorithm was used for the analysis.
137: The middle and bottom panels in Figure 3 show the power spectrum for the years 2001 and 2002,
138: respectively, derived using similar analysis techniques.
139: The detection limit of a period at the 3$\sigma$ confidence level (99$\%$) is
140: a power of 18.2 in the middle panel (2001 data),
141: a power of 13.8 in the top panel (2000 data) and a power of 15.8 in the bottom panel (2002 data)
142: (see also Scargle 1982).
143: Before calculating the power spectra, the individual or consecutive
144: nights were normalized by subtraction of the mean magnitude.
145: In order to correct for the effects of time windows and sampling on power spectra,
146: synthetic constant light curves were created and a few very prominent frequency peaks that appear
147: in these light curves were prewhitened from the data in the analysis.
148: When necessary, the red noise in the lower frequencies
149: was removed by detrending the data using linear or quadratic fits.
150: There was considerable red noise in the power spectra especially for the years 2001 and 2002.
151: The red noise level at the low frequencies below 10 d$^{-1}$ (2$\times 10^{-4}$ Hz)
152: increased by a factor of three from 2000 to 2001 and 2002.
153:
154: We found a prominent period at P=0.146126(18) d using the whole data set.
155: The power spectra on Figure 3
156: show the highest peak at this period
157: and the group of peaks around
158: it are some of the $\pm$1/3, $\pm$1/2, $\pm$1, and $\pm$2 day
159: aliases of the detected period.
160: In all the figures except Figure 3, top panel, the second harmonic of P is present.
161: We did not recover any other significant and/or persistent period in all the years (2000-2002).
162: The ephemeris for P determined by fitting a sine curve are :
163:
164: \noindent
165: T$_{0}$= HJD 2451966.820($\pm$0.001) + 0.146126($\pm$0.000018)E
166:
167: The accumulated error on the period for the entire time span of our optical data is
168: 0.014 d (about 10$\%$ of one cycle).
169: Figure 4 displays the mean light curves folded on P. The top and bottom panels (among the three panels in the figure)
170: show the folded light curve of the 2001 and 2002 data sets, respectively.
171: The short light curves obtained in 2000 have high statistical errors
172: in comparison with the period modulation amplitude, which gives a
173: large error on the detected period (see Figure 3, top panel). This, in return, yields a high ambiguity in the
174: modulation amplitude and thus, we excluded the mean light curve from Figure 4.
175: The lines in the middle of the top and bottom panels on Figure 4 show the average variation in the differential
176: magnitude of the three reference stars used in the analysis folded on P
177: (i.e., mean light curve of the reference stars).
178: The number of bins in each panel (on Figure 4) are
179: chosen in accordance with the accumulated error for each data set.
180: The period P showed an amplitude variation of
181: $<$0$^{m}$.007 in 2000.
182: The amplitude of the variations were increased significantly
183: to 0$^{m}$.014$\pm$0$^{m}$.003 in 2001 and to 0$^{m}$.023$\pm$0$^{m}$.008 in 2002
184: where the shape was almost sinusoidal.
185: The increase in modulation depth was more than 55$\%$ (in magnitude) from 2000 to 2001
186: and about 64$\%$ from 2001 to 2002 on the average.
187:
188: \section{DISCUSSION}
189:
190: We presented 30 nights of data on V382 Vel obtained using
191: clear filters in 2000, 2001 and 2002. We discovered modulations in the light curve
192: of the nova at the period P=0.146126(18) d with an amplitude of
193: $\Delta m$$<$0.007 in 2000 and the amplitude
194: increased to $\Delta m$= 0.014 in 2001 and to $\Delta m$=0.023 in 2002.
195: Since the periodicity is persistent and coherent, we propose that this is the
196: binary period of the system.
197:
198: In general, eclipses or occultation effects are
199: detected from novae in outburst and in quiescence (Leibowitz et al. 1992; Kato et al. 2004;
200: Shafter et al. 1993, Woudt $\&$ Warner 2001, 2002, 2003). For example,
201: V838 Her (N Her 1991) shows variable
202: eclipse depth that lasts from 2 to 3 hours, whose depth varies between 0.1 and 0.4 magnitues in about 4 month
203: (Leibowitz et al. 1992). The eclipse depth in V1494 Aql (N Aql No.2) is reported to change by 10 times
204: from 0.05 to 0.5 magnitudes in one year from July 2000 to July 2001 (Bos et al. 2001).
205:
206: The increase in the modulation amplidutes detected throughout the 2000-2002 light curves indicates
207: an occultation in the binary system that is becoming more apparent with time.
208: This is also accompanied with the decreasing brightness/cooling of the WD by about 2 magnitudes
209: from 2000 to 2001 and by about 1.5 magnitudes after February 2001 until the end of January 2002
210: (see Figure 1).
211: We interpret the cause of the variations in 2001 and 2002 as the occultation of an accretion disk by the
212: secondary star.
213: Fading of the nova itself, is due to a decline in the optical radiation of an uneclipsed source.
214: Therefore, in time, the relative contribution of the occulted body to the total optical output of the
215: system increases causing an increase in the observed amplitude of the variations.
216: Augusto $\&$ Diaz (2003)
217: found an increase in the blue continuum of the nova spectra by 565 days after the outburst
218: and interpreted it as an indication of the
219: re-establishment of accretion and presence of an accretion disk in the system. This confirms our findings since our observations in 2001
220: start about 645 days after the outburst.
221: The existence of the accretion disk (i.e., mass transfer via an accretion disk) is also supported by the
222: increasing level of red noise seen in the power spectra in 2001 and 2002 as mentioned in sec.(3)
223: (see also van Der Klis 2000).
224: In addition, the expanding photosphere of the nova is already below the
225: surface of the critical lobe of the WD by 2001 since the X-ray turn-off is between December 1999 and February 2000 (Ness et al. 2005).
226: Moreover, the nova/nova shell is already in the nebular stage by the beginning of our optical observations,
227: thus there can not have been any obscuration originating from the ejected material and/or circumbinary medium.
228:
229: After a nova explosion, the hot WDs may heat and irradiate their cooler companions
230: once they become Super Soft X-ray Sources (SSS) in the course of their evolution
231: (e.g, V1974 Cyg: DeYoung $\&$ Schmidt 1994; also, GQ Mus: Diaz et al. 1995; V1494 Aql:
232: Hachisu et al. 2004).
233: The orbital period of novae can be detected as a result of
234: the aspect variations of the secondary due to heating from the hot WD
235: (Kovetz, Prialnik, $\&$ Shara 1988) and the asymmetry in the pulse profiles could be
236: produced once the shape of the secondary is of a tear drop model.
237: The irradiation effects in classical novae
238: can also be detected long after the outburst stage (e.g., V1500 Cyg: Sommers $\&$ Naylor
239: 1999; DM Gem: Retter et al. 1999).
240: As mentioned before, V382 Vel was detected as an SSS
241: and found to turn off the H burning between December 1999 and February 2000 (about eight months
242: after the outburst).
243: Our observations start
244: in 2000 May 30 and June 2 where the stellar remnant was still hot and the soft-flux
245: was declining
246: in the X-ray wavelengths (Burwitz et al. 2002; Ness et al. 2005).
247: As a result, we expect to see some irradiation
248: effects in this system.
249:
250: The orbital variations in V1974 Cyg were $\sim$0$^m$.1 in the $I$ band and
251: $<$0$^m$.05 in the $V$ band
252: about the time the H-burning turned-off in 1993 (the WD temperature was about
253: 3-4$\times$ 10$^5$ K; Balman et al. 1998). The modulation depth in the I band decreased to about 0.025 magnitudes
254: in 1994 (one year later, Retter et al. 1997)
255: where the remnant WD was no longer detectable in the X-ray wavelengths.
256: Another classical nova detected as
257: an SSS showing irradiation effects, was GQ Mus (the WD temperature was about
258: 5.1$\times$10$^5$ K in 1992;
259: Balman $\&$ Krautter 2001 and references therein).
260: The optical light curve showed modulation at the orbital period with an amplitude of 0.33 magnitudes in
261: 1990 that decreased to 0.05 magnitudes in 1994 while the detected asymmetric profile of 1990 changed to
262: a symmetric flat-topped modulation in 1994 (Diaz $\&$ Steiner 1994; Diaz et al. 1995).
263: The optical pulse profile of GQ Mus in 1990 resembles the profile of V1974 Cyg in 1993 and
264: V2275 Cyg in 2003 (N Cyg 2001 No. 2) where the first two are novae with orbital periods below the period gap
265: and the latter a nova with an orbital period of about 7.6 hours (Balman et al. 2003; Balman et al. 2005).
266: The pulse shapes of the orbital modulation of V2275 Cyg changed significantly from 2002 to 2003 and
267: the modulation amplitude decreased (at the orbital period) from 0.42 magnitudes in 2002 to 0.22 magnitudes in 2003, while
268: the irradiated face of the secondary cooled in time (Balman et al. 2005). This source was not observed
269: in the X-rays, thus an SSS phase is not confirmed.
270:
271: A close inspection of the 2001 light curve of V382 Vel reveals that the modulation shape shows deviations from
272: a pure sinusoidal. Therefore, we constructed a synthetic sine wave using the orbital
273: frequency and subtracted
274: this from the 2001 light curve which would be equivalent to the removal of the variations as a result of
275: the occultation of the disk. The middle panel of Figure 4 shows the residual emission
276: in the light curve of V382 Vel folded on the orbital period.
277: There is additional flux at phases about $\Phi$$\simeq$0.10-0.15 and 0.5-0.6.
278: These phases correspond to the position of the secondary at about 90$^{\circ}$ to our line of sight. Thus,
279: these humps can possibly be explained
280: by the emission from the irradiated side of the secondary (eg., at the vicinity of L1, the lagrangian point)
281: falling into our line of sight. The observed excess dip at about the orbital minimum
282: (about $\Phi$$\simeq$0.8-0.9) is, then could be caused
283: by the self-occultation of the irradiated zone by the secondary star when the star is between the WD and
284: the observer.
285: As time progresses, much less emission
286: from the irradiated secondary intervenes with the modulation depths (due to occultation of the accretion
287: disk) in 2002 resulting in a more sinusoidal pulse shape.
288: The scenario described here requires a relatively high inclination angle for the
289: system.
290:
291: We did not recover any significant superhump period in the light curve of V382 Vel given the time span of our
292: observations that extends to about 985 days after outburst. Superhumps are QPOs caused by
293: tidal instabilities in accreting binary systems with M$_2$/M$_1$$<$0.35$\pm$0.02 (see Patterson et al.
294: 2005 for a general review; Nelemans 2005 for AM CVns).
295: In classical novae superhumps can be used as probes to study how accretion is reestablished after the
296: outburst. Several systems show such QPOs as early as two and a half months after the outburst
297: (V4633 Sgr, Lipkin et al. 2001) or
298: even two years after the outburst like V1974 Cyg
299: (Retter et al. 1997).
300:
301: We checked the possibility of any change in the detected binary period.
302: This could have revealed a system that was recoiling to its original size after the
303: initial eruption with a slight expansion in the
304: binary separation. The entire light curve were separated into six consecutive observations and
305: the period was calculated for each set.
306: The data were consistent with a constant line and no period derivative.
307:
308: \section{SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS}
309:
310: We have detected a consistent and coherent periodicity P=0.146126(18) in the optical light curve of the
311: classical nova V382 Vel using the data obtained in the years 2000 (two nights), 2001 (21 nights) and 2002
312: (seven nights).
313: The observations were conducted at the Wharemaru Observatory (2000; 0.25m telescope) and Molehill Observatory
314: (2000-2001; 0.3m telescope) in New Zealand. We interpret this variation as the binary period of the underlying system.
315: We conclude that the cause of variations is the occultation of an accretion disk by the secondary star.
316: We detect increasing modulation amplitudes as the nova itself cools off in time in the
317: optical wavelengths, and the contribution of light from the occulted disk into the total
318: light curve increases enhancing the amount of variation in the light curve.
319: The increase in the variation amplitude from 2000 ($\Delta$m$<$0.007) to 2001
320: ($\Delta$m=.014$\pm$0.003) is larger than 55$\%$ and from 2001 to 2002 ($\Delta$m=0.023$\pm$0.008), it is 64$\%$.
321: We also observe variation of the shape and depth of the mean light curves particularly in 2001.
322: We favor a scenario where variations due to the aspect changes of the irradiated secondary star
323: intervenes with the optical light curve at phases
324: 0.10-0.15, 0.5-0.6 and 0.8-0.9.
325:
326: The soft X-ray radiation from the WDs in the outburst stage of classical novae
327: could trigger irradiation induced high mass transfer resulting
328: in re-establishment of the accretion disk. Irradiation induced
329: mass transfer cycles
330: occur in compact binaries if the donor star has a shallow convective envelope (fast thermal time scale),
331: or the system has mass transfer driven on a long dynamical timescale, or the
332: photosphere scale height is small (Buning $\&$ Ritter 2004; Ritter, Zhang, $\&$ Kolb 2000).
333: Once the nova is a soft X-ray source it has the potential to
334: irradiate its companion initiating mass transfer (stable/limit cycle)
335: if the basic conditions described above are also met depending on other important parameters
336: like the masses of the two stars, the binary separation, etc.
337: The systems which have orbital periods above 3 hrs
338: tend to form mass
339: transfer limit cycles whereas the systems with periods
340: below 2.5 hrs show stable
341: mass transfer unless the deriving rate is no larger than a few times
342: the gravitational braking rate (Buning $\&$ Ritter 2004).
343: The H burning phase of classical novae outbursts will be interesting laboratories to
344: study irradiation induced mass transfer phenomenon for CVs. In addition, the hibernation scenario for novae
345: suggests that classical novae remain bright for a few centuries after the eruption
346: because of irradiation induced mass transfer (Shara et al. 1986; Prialnik
347: $\&$ Shara 1986). Nova systems are known to show
348: irradiation effects and/or superhumps in their light curves after the optical decline
349: (see Retter $\&$ Naylor 2000).
350:
351: The three years of monitoring observations of the classical nova V382 Vel
352: in the optical wavelengths
353: have revealed several important facts on the evolution of classical novae
354: during the outburst stage.
355: It shows that accretion is established and a disk is present early in the
356: evolution
357: (as early as 645 days after the outburst). It also shows evidence that the irradiation of the secondary
358: stars by the hot stellar remnants (WDs) could be a common phenomenon that is
359: apparent in the outburst light curves of the first few years till after the stellar remnants cool off of the
360: X-ray wavelengths. Only few novae have been detected during the SSS phase
361: in the X-rays that lasts a few weeks up to several years after the outburst (eg. less than 9-10 years: Orio 2004) and such
362: observations are difficult to obtain due to the tight schedules of the X-ray satellites.
363: The evolution of the light variations as a result of the aspect changes of
364: the irradiated secondary stars can yield additional indirect proof of the evolution
365: of the hot white dwarfs after the outburst and complement the X-ray observations if systematic long term ground-based
366: observations can be maintained in the optical wavelengths.
367:
368:
369: \acknowledgements
370: {The Authors acknowledge the American Association of Variable Stars (AAVSO) for
371: providing the accumulated photometric data of V382 Vel from 1999-2003
372: (used to construct Figure 1). We thank S. Walker for sending us the 2000 data of V382 Vel.
373: AR was partially supported by a research associate fellowship from Penn State University.
374: Finally, SB would like to acknowledge the support from the Turkish Academy of Sciences with
375: the TUBA-GEBIP (distinguished young scientist award) Fellowship. }
376:
377: \begin{references}
378: \reference{a1} Augusto, A., $\&$ Diaz, M.P. 2003, AJ, 125, 3349
379: \reference{b1} Balman, S., Yilmaz, A., Retter, A., Saygac, T., $\&$ Esenoglu H. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 773
380: \reference{b1} Balman, S., Yilmaz, A., Retter, A., Ak., T., Saygac, T., Esenoglu, H., $\&$ Aslan, Z. 2003, IAU Circ., 8074, 3
381: \reference{b2} Balman, S., Krautter, J., $\&$ \"Ogelman, H. 1998, ApJ, 499, 395
382: \reference{b3} Balman, S., $\&$ Krautter, J. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1441
383: \reference{b5} Burwitz, V. et al. 2002, in Classical Nova Explosions, AIP Conf. Proc.,
384: Vol. 637, Margarita Hernanz $\&$ Jordi Jose (eds), p. 377
385: \reference{b6} Buning, A. $\&$ Ritter, H. 2004, A$\&$A, 423, 281
386: \reference{b7} Bos, M., Retter, A., McCormick, J., $\&$ Velthuis, F. 2001, IAU Circ., 7610, 2
387: \reference{b7} Bos, M., Retter, A., Cook, L., $\&$ Novak, R. 2001, IAU Circ., 7665, 2
388: \reference{d3} Diaz, M. $\&$ Steiner, J.E. 1994, ApJ, 425, 252
389: \reference{d4} Diaz, M.P., Williams, R.E., Phillips, M.M., $\&$ Hamuy, M. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 959
390: \reference{h1} Hachisu, I., Kato, M., Kato, T. 2004, ApJ, 606, L139
391: \reference{k1} Kato, T., Ishiuka R., Uemura M., Starkey D.R., Krajci T. 2004, PASJ, 56, 125
392: \reference{v1} van der Klis, M. 2000, ARA$\&$A, 38, 717
393: \reference{k2} Kovetz, A., Prialnik D., Shara M.M. 1988, ApJ, 325, 828
394: \reference{l2} Leahy, D.A., Elsner R.F., Weisskopf M.C. 1983, 272, 256
395: \reference{l2} Lee, S., Pearce, A., Gilmore, C., Polland, K.R., Mc Saveney, J.A, Kilmartin, P.M.,
396: $\&$ Caldwell, P. 1999, IAU Circ., 7176, 1
397: \reference{l1} Leibowitz, E.M., Mendelson H., Mashal E., Prialnik D., Seitter W.C. 1992, ApJ, 385, L49
398: \reference{l1} Lipkin, Y., Leibowitz, E.M., Retter, A., $\&$ Shemner, O. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1169
399: \reference{m1} Mukai, K. $\&$ Ishida, M. 2001, ApJ, 551, 1024
400: \reference{n1} Nelemens, G. 2005, in The Astrophysics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects,
401: ASP Conf. Ser. Vol.330, J.M. Hameury and J.P. Lasota (eds), (San Francisco : ASP), p.27
402: \reference{n2} Ness, J.U., Starrfield, S., Jordan, C. Krautter, J., $\&$ Schmitt, J.H.M.M. 2005, MNRAS, inpress
403: \reference{o3} Orio, M. 2004, in Compact Binaries in the Galaxy and Beyond IAU Colloqium 194,
404: Revisita Mexicana Astronomica y Astrofisica Vol. 20
405: (series de Conferences), G. Tovmassian $\&$ E. Sion (eds), p. 182
406: \reference{o1} Orio, M. et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, L13
407: \reference{o2} Orio, M., Parmar, A., Greiner, J., Ogelman, H., Starrfield, S., $\&$ Trussoni, E.
408: 2002, MNRAS, 333, L11
409: \reference{p1} Patterson, J. et al. 2005, PASP, in press (astro-ph/0507371)
410: \reference{r1} Retter, A., Leibowitz E.M., Ofek E.O. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 745
411: \reference{r2} Retter, A., Leibowitz E.M., $\&$ Naylor T. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 140
412: %\reference{r3} Retter, A., Leibowitz E.M., $\&$ Kovo-Kariti, O. 1998, 293, 145
413: \reference{r4} Retter, A., $\&$ Naylor T. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 510
414: \reference{r5} Ritter, H., Zhang, Z.Y., $\&$ Kolb, U. 2000, A$\&$A, 360, 969
415: \reference{s1} Scargle, J.D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835
416: \reference{s3} Shafter, A.W., Misselt, K.A., $\&$ Veal, J.M. 1993, PASP, 105,
417: 853
418: \reference{s2} Shara, M. 1989, PASP, 101, 5
419: \reference{s2} Shara, M., Livio, M., Moffat, A.F.J., $\&$ Orio, M. 1986, ApJ, 311, 163
420: \reference{s2} Prialnik, D. $\&$ Shara, M. 1986, ApJ, 311, 172
421: \reference{s11} Shore, S. et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1507
422: \reference{s10} Somers, M.W. $\&$ Naylor T. 1999, A$\&$A, 352, 563
423: \reference{s9} Starrfield, S. 2002, in Classical Nova Explosions, AIP Conf. Proc.,
424: Vol. 637, Margarita Hernanz $\&$ Jordi Jose (eds), p. 89
425: \reference{s3} Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
426: \reference{w0} Woodward, C.E. Wooden, D.H., Pina. R.K., $\&$ Fisher R.S. 1999, IAU Circ., 7220, 3
427: \reference{w1} Woudt, P.A. $\&$ Warner, B. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 159
428: \reference{w2} Woudt, P.A. $\&$ Warner, B. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 44
429: \reference{w3} Woudt, P.A. $\&$ Warner, B. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1011
430: \end{references}
431:
432: \begin{center}
433: \begin{table}
434: \footnotesize{
435: \label{1}
436: \caption{{\small The Time Table of the Observations (only Clear Filters were used)}}
437: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
438: \hline
439: UT Date & Time of Start & Run & Number of & \\
440: (ddmmyy) & (JD-2451000) & Time (h) & Frames &
441: \\
442: \hline
443: 300500 & 694.86480 & 3.6 & 368 &
444: \\
445: 020600 & 697.84761 & 3.4 & 322 &
446: \\
447: 070101 & 917.60610 & 0.4 & 117 &
448: \\
449: 080101 & 918.60250 & 0.4 & 137 &
450: \\
451: 110101 & 921.59740 & 0.7 & 239 &
452: \\
453: 260201 & 966.83482 & 3.4 & 409 &
454: \\
455: 270201 & 967.86559 & 6.1 & 553 &
456: \\
457: 010301 & 969.86190 & 5.5 & 365 &
458: \\
459: 030301 & 971.86294 & 8.6 & 405 &
460: \\
461: 120301 & 980.89287 & 4.7 & 227 &
462: \\
463: 150301 & 983.81037 & 4.8 & 216 &
464: \\
465: 200301 & 988.86071 & 5.3 & 255 &
466: \\
467: 220301 & 990.90068 & 5.4 & 265 &
468: \\
469: 250301 & 993.80471 & 7.1 & 351 &
470: \\
471: 080401 & 1007.80075 & 4.6 & 214 &
472: \\
473: 140401 & 1013.82624 & 8.0 & 200 &
474: \\
475: 150401 & 1014.00021 & 3.3 & 339 &
476: \\
477: 210401 & 1020.86706 & 6.0 & 266 &
478: \\
479: 260401 & 1025.84035 & 6.2 & 313 &
480: \\
481: 160501 & 1045.78056 & 6.7 & 338 &
482: \\
483: 310501 & 1060.77713 & 6.3 & 304 &
484: \\
485: 030601 & 1063.76066 & 6.2 & 309 &
486: \\
487: 010102 & 1275.94739 & 5.3 & 246 &
488: \\
489: 020102 & 1276.89827 & 6.5 & 315 &
490: \\
491: 060102 & 1280.96234 & 2.5 & 157 &
492: \\
493: 070102 & 1281.86860 & 7.4 & 444 &
494: \\
495: 200102 & 1294.87748 & 5.1 & 307 &
496: \\
497: 210102 & 1295.86859 & 4.1 & 248 &
498: \\
499: 220102 & 1296.86293 & 5.3 & 318 &
500: \\
501: \end{tabular}
502: }
503: \end{table}
504: \end{center}
505:
506: \newpage
507:
508: \figcaption{The AAVSO Lightcurve of V382 Vel obtained from the initial outburst
509: in May 1999 until 2003. The arrows indicate the observation times on Table 1.}
510:
511: \figcaption{The figure presents the normalized differential light curve of V382 Vel
512: observed in 2000-2002. The observational dates are noted on each panel.
513: The data obtained in 2000 are taken with the 0.25 m telescope at the Wharemaru Observatory, New Zealand.
514: The rest of the data are taken with the 0.3 m Telescope, Auckland, New Zealand. Only clear filters are
515: used. The epoch of the
516: observations are noted on the x axis. The error bars of the data points are about $0^m.03$,
517: $0^m.014$, and $0^m.013$ for the years 2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. The scale of the x and y axes are
518: fixed throughout the figure for better comparison.}
519:
520: \figcaption{
521: The power spectrum of
522: V382 Vel, derived from the 2000 data set (top panel), the 2001 data set (middle panel), and the
523: 2002 data set (bottom panel). The Scargle algorithm is used for the analyses.
524: The new period is indicated with P and its significant second harmonic
525: is also noted.
526: }
527:
528: \figcaption{ The mean light curves of the 2001 and 2002 data sets, folded on the
529: period (P=0.146126(18) d) are presented at the top, and bottom panels, respectively.
530: The middle panel shows the excess emission in phase once the binary period is prewhitened from the
531: light curve of 2001. The lines in the middle of the three panels show the average variation in the differential
532: magnitude of the three reference stars (used in the analysis) folded on the binary period (P=0.146126(18) d).
533: The first data point in time (start mid-HJD in 2000)
534: is taken as the reference for the three mean light curves
535: and a grouping (averaged over) of 25 phase bins (top), 20 phase bins (middle) and 20 phase bins
536: (bottom) are used for the folding process. }
537:
538: \begin{center}
539:
540: \begin{figure}
541: \plotone{f1.eps}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: \begin{figure}
545: \plotone{f2.ps}
546: \end{figure}
547:
548: \begin{figure}
549: \plotone{f3.eps}
550: \end{figure}
551:
552: \begin{figure}
553: \plotone{f4.eps}
554: \end{figure}
555:
556: \end{center}
557: \end{document}
558: