1: \def \SAIT #1 #2 {{\em Mem.\ Soc.\ Astron.\ It.\/} {\bf #1}, #2}
2: \def \MESS #1 #2 {{\em The Messenger\/} {#1}, #2}
3: \def \ASTRNACH #1 #2 {{ Astron. Nach.\/} { #1}, #2}
4: \def \AAP #1 #2 {{ A{\rm \&}A\/} {#1}, #2}
5: \def \AAL #1 #2 {{ A{\rm \&}A\/} {#1}, L#2}
6: \def \AAR #1 #2 {{ A{\rm \&}AR\/} {#1}, #2}
7: \def \AAS #1 #2 {{ A{\rm \&}AS\/} {#1}, #2}
8: \def \AJ #1 #2 {{ AJ\/} {#1}, #2}
9: \def \ANNREV #1 #2 {{ ARA{\rm \&}A\/} {#1},#2}
10: \def \APJ #1 #2 {{ ApJ\/} {#1}, #2}
11: \def \APJL #1 #2 {{ ApJ\/} {#1}, L#2}
12: \def \APJS #1 #2 {{ ApJS\/} {#1}, #2}
13: \def \APSS #1 #2 {{ Ap{\rm \&}SS\/} {#1}, #2}
14: \def \ASR #1 #2 {{ Adv. Space Res.\/} {#1}, #2}
15: \def \BAIC #1 #2 {{ Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl.\/} { #1}, #2}
16: \def \JSQRT #1 #2 {{ J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer\/} {
17: #1}, #2}
18: \def \MN #1 #2 {{ MNRAS\/} { #1}, #2}
19: \def \MEM #1 #2 {{ Mem. R. Astr. Soc.\/} { #1}, #2}
20: \def \PLR #1 #2 {{ Phys. Lett. Rev.\/} { #1}, #2}
21: \def \PASJ #1 #2 {{ Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan\/} { #1}, #2}
22: \def \PASP #1 #2 {{ Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific\/} { #1}, #2}
23: \def \NAT #1 #2 {{ Nat\/} { #1}, #2}
24: \def \ACTA #1 #2 {{ Acta Astron.\/} { #1}, #2}
25: %
26: \newcommand{\BVo}{\mbox{${\rm (B-V)_{0}}$}}
27: \newcommand{\UBo}{\mbox{${\rm (U-B)_{0}}$}}
28: \newcommand{\BV}{\mbox{${\rm (B-V)}$}}
29: \newcommand{\VK}{\mbox{${\rm (V-K)}$}}
30: \newcommand{\UB}{\mbox{${\rm (U-B)}$}}
31: \newcommand{\UV}{\mbox{${\rm (U-V)}$}}
32: \newcommand{\VI}{\mbox{${\rm (V-I)}$}}
33: \newcommand{\VR}{\mbox{${\rm (V-R)}$}}
34: \newcommand{\EBV}{\mbox{${\rm E_{B-V}}$}}
35: \newcommand{\UVex}{\mbox{${\rm (1550-V)}$}}
36: \newcommand{\Hbeta}{\mbox{${\rm H_{\beta}}$}}
37: \newcommand{\MgFe}{\mbox{${\rm [MgFe]} $}}
38: \newcommand{\MFe}{\mbox{${\rm < Fe >} $}}
39: \newcommand{\LogS}{\mbox{${\rm \log \Sigma}$}}
40: \newcommand{\Mv}{\mbox{${\rm M_{V}}$}}
41: \newcommand{\Mbol}{\mbox{${\rm M_{bol}}$}}
42: \newcommand{\DM}{\mbox{${\rm (m-M)}$}}
43: \newcommand{\DMo}{\mbox{${\rm (m-M)_{0}}$}}
44: \newcommand{\FeH}{\mbox{{\rm [Fe/H]}}}
45: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{${\rm M_{\odot}}$}}
46: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{${\rm T\sub{eff}}$}}
47: \newcommand{\logT}{\mbox{${\rm \log T\sub{eff}}$}}
48: \newcommand{\dydz}{\mbox{${\rm \Delta Y/ \Delta Z}$}}
49: \newcommand{\logL}{\mbox{${\rm \log L/L_{\odot}}$}}
50: \newcommand{\logS}{\mbox{${\rm \log\Sigma }$}}
51: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{{\rm et~al.}}}
52: \newcommand{\MS}{\mbox{${\rm M_{S}}$}}
53: \newcommand{\ML}{\mbox{${\rm M_{L}}$}}
54: \newcommand{\MD}{\mbox{${\rm M_{D}}$}}
55: \newcommand{\RL}{\mbox{${\rm R_{L}}$}}
56: \newcommand{\RD}{\mbox{${\rm R_{D}}$}}
57:
58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59: \newcommand{\sub}[1]{\mbox{$_{\rm #1}$}}
60: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{H\,{\sc ii}}}
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: %
63: % version November 10, 2005
64: %
65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66: %%
67: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
68: %%
69: %% Modified 2004 January 9
70: %%
71: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
72: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
73:
74: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
75: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
76: %% any data that comes before this command.
77:
78: %% The command below calls the preprint style
79: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
80: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
81: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
82: %%
83: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
84:
85: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
86: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
87: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
88:
89: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
90: %\documentclass[preprint]{emulateapj}
91: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
92: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
93:
94: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
95: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
96: %% use the longabstract style option.
97:
98: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
99:
100: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
101: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
102: %% the \begin{document} command.
103: %%
104: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
105: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
106: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
107: %% for information.
108:
109: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
110: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
111: %\newcommand{\mybold}{\bf }
112: \newcommand{\mybold}{}
113:
114: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
115:
116: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJL.}
117:
118: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
119: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
120: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
121: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
122: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
123: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
124:
125: \shorttitle{IRS spectra of Virgo early type galaxies}
126: \shortauthors{Bressan et al.}
127:
128: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
129: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
130:
131:
132: %\usepackage{graphicx}
133: \usepackage{psfig,latexsym,longtable,lscape,rotating}
134:
135: \def\oneskip{\vskip 8pt}
136: \def\smallskip{\vskip 6pt}
137: \def\littleskip{\vskip 4pt}
138: \def\M12{${\rm M_{12}}$}
139: \def\Wbar{W{\hskip -7pt}$\slash$ \ }
140:
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142:
143: \begin{document}
144:
145: \title{{SPITZER} IRS spectra of Virgo early type galaxies: \\
146: {\mybold detection of stellar silicate emission.}}
147: \author{A. Bressan\altaffilmark{1,3,4},
148: P. Panuzzo\altaffilmark{1},
149: L. Buson\altaffilmark{1},
150: M. Clemens\altaffilmark{1},
151: G. L. Granato\altaffilmark{1,4},
152: R. Rampazzo\altaffilmark{1},\\
153: L. Silva\altaffilmark{2},
154: J. R. Valdes\altaffilmark{3},
155: O. Vega\altaffilmark{3},
156: L. Danese\altaffilmark{4}
157: }
158: %\affil{INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy}
159: \altaffiltext{1}
160: {INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy}
161: \altaffiltext{2}{INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
162: \altaffiltext{3}{INAOE, Luis Enrique Erro 1, 72840, Tonantzintla, Puebla, Mexico}
163: \altaffiltext{4}{SISSA, via Beirut 4, 34014, Trieste, Italy}
164: \email{ bressan@pd.astro.it;
165: panuzzo@pd.astro.it;
166: buson@pd.astro.it;
167: clemens@pd.astro.it;
168: granato@pd.astro.it;
169: silva@ts.astro.it;
170: jrvaldes@inaoep.mx;
171: ovega@inaoep.mx;
172: danese@sissa.it}
173:
174: %\author{L. Silva}
175: %\affil{INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
176:
177: %\author{J.R. Valdes, O. Vega}
178: %\affil{INAOE, Luis Enrique Erro 1, 72840, Tonantzintla, Puebla, Mexico}
179: %\email{jvaldes@inaoep.mx}
180:
181: %\and
182:
183: %\author{L.Danese}
184: %\affil{Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), via Beirut 4, 34014, Trieste, Italy}
185: %\email{danese@sissa.it}
186:
187: %\offprints{A. Bressan, \email{bressan@pd.astro.it} }
188:
189: \date{Received / Accepted }
190:
191: \begin{abstract}
192: We present high {\mybold signal to noise ratio} {\it Spitzer} Infrared Spectrograph observations of 17 Virgo early-type galaxies. The galaxies were selected
193: from those that define the colour-magnitude relation of the cluster, with
194: the aim of detecting the silicate emission
195: of their dusty, mass-losing evolved stars.
196: To flux calibrate these extended sources we have devised a new procedure
197: that allows us to obtain the intrinsic spectral energy distribution
198: and to disentangle resolved and unresolved emission within the same object.
199: We have found that thirteen objects of the sample (76\%)
200: are passively evolving galaxies with a pronounced broad silicate feature
201: which is spatially extended and likely of stellar origin,
202: in agreement with model predictions.
203: The other 4 objects (24\%) are characterized by
204: different levels of activity. In NGC 4486 (M~87)
205: the line emission and the broad silicate
206: emission are evidently unresolved and, given also the typical
207: shape of the continuum, they likely originate in the
208: nuclear torus. NGC 4636 shows emission lines superimposed on
209: extended (i.e. stellar) silicate emission, thus pushing the
210: percentage of galaxies with silicate emission to 82\%.
211: Finally, NGC 4550 and NGC 4435 are characterized by polycyclic aromatic
212: hydrocarbon (PAH) and line emission,
213: arising from a central unresolved region. A more detailed analysis of our
214: sample, with updated models, will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
215: \end{abstract}
216: \keywords{
217: -- Galaxies: formation and evolution
218: -- Galaxies: stellar content
219: -- Interstellar medium: dust extinction
220: -- Infrared: galaxies}
221:
222: %\titlerunning{{\it SPITZER} IRS spectra of early-type galaxies}
223: %\authorrunning{A. Bressan et al.}
224:
225: %\maketitle
226:
227: \section{Introduction}
228: Bressan, Granato \& Silva \cite{Bres98} have
229: suggested that the presence of dusty circumstellar envelopes
230: around asymptotic giant branch(AGB) stars should leave a signature,
231: a clear excess at 10 ${\mu}$m, in the mid infrared (MIR)
232: spectral region of passively
233: evolving stellar systems.
234: Early detections of such an excess were suspected in M32 (Impey et al. 1986)
235: from ground based observations, and in a few ellipticals observed with ISOCAM
236: (Bregman et al. 1998). The first unambiguous confirmation of the existence of
237: this feature, though barely resolved, was found in the ISO CVF
238: spectrum of NGC 1399 (Bressan et al. 2001).
239: Since AGB stars are luminous tracers of intermediate age and old stellar
240: populations, an accurate analysis of this feature has been suggested as a
241: complementary way to
242: disentangle age and metallicity effects
243: among early type galaxies (Bressan et al. 1998; 2001).
244: More specifically, Bressan et al.'s models
245: show that a degeneracy between metallicity and age persists even in
246: the MIR, since both age and metallicity affect mass-loss
247: and evolutionary lifetimes on the AGB. While in the optical
248: age and metallicity need to be anti-correlated to maintain a
249: feature unchanged (either colour or narrow band index),
250: in the MIR it is the opposite: the larger dust-mass loss
251: of a higher metallicity {\mybold simple stellar population (SSP)}
252: must be balanced by
253: its older age.
254: Thus a detailed comparison of the MIR
255: and optical spectra of passively evolving systems constitutes perhaps one of the cleanest ways
256: to remove the degeneracy.
257: Besides this simple motivation and all other aspects connected
258: with the detection of evolved mass-losing stars in passive
259: systems (e.g. Athey et al. 2002),
260: a deep look into the mid
261: infrared region may reveal even tiny amounts of activity.
262: In this letter we present the detection of extended silicate features in
263: a sample of Virgo cluster early type galaxies, observed with the IRS
264: instrument\footnote{The IRS was a
265: collaborative venture between Cornell University and Ball Aerospace
266: Corporation, funded by NASA through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and
267: the Ames Research Center} (Houck et al. 2004) of the
268: {\it Spitzer Space Telescope.} (Werner et al. 2004).
269: %\begin{center}
270: \begin{table}
271: \scriptsize
272: \caption{Virgo galaxies observed with IRS}
273: \label{tab1}
274: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
275: %\tablewidth{0.5\textwidth}
276: %\rotate
277: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
278: %\tablehead{ \colhead{Name} & \colhead{V$_T$} & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{SL1, SL2 (60s) & LL2 (120s)}
279: %\tablecolumns{ Name & Date & Exp. Times (seconds) & Name & Date & Exp. Times (seconds) }
280: %\startdata
281: \hline
282: \hline
283: Name & V$_T$ & Date & SL1/2 & LL2 & S/N \\
284: & & & 60s & 120s & 6$\mu$m. \\
285: \hline
286: % & & & & \\
287: NGC~4339 & 11.40 & Jun 06 2005 & 20 & 14 & 39 \\
288: NGC~4365 & 9.62 & Jan 10 2005 & 3 & 3 & 57 \\
289: NGC~4371 & 10.79 & Jun 01 2005 & 9 & 10 & 40 \\
290: NGC~4377 & 11.88 & Jun 01 2005 & 12 & 8 & 54 \\
291: NGC~4382 & 9.09 & Jul 07 2005 & 3 & 3 & 59 \\
292: NGC~4435 & 10.66 & Jun 01 2005 & 3 & 5 & 35 \\
293: NGC~4442 & 10.30 & Jan 10 2005 & 3 & 3 & 46 \\
294: NGC~4473 & 10.06 & Jun 01 2005 & 3 & 3 & 55 \\
295: NGC~4474 & 11.50 & Jun 01 2005 & 20 & 14 & 38 \\
296: NGC~4486 & 8.62 & Jun 03 2005 & 3 & 3 & 80 \\
297: NGC~4550 & 11.50 & Jun 03 2005 & 20 & 14 & 42 \\
298: NGC~4551 & 11.86 & Jun 03 2005 & 20 & 14 & 47 \\
299: NGC~4564 & 11.12 & Jun 07 2005 & 4 & 6 & 51 \\
300: NGC~4570 & 10.90 & Jun 06 2005 & 3 & 5 & 42 \\
301: NGC~4621 & 9.81 & Jan 12 2005 & 3 & 3 & 63 \\
302: NGC~4636 & 9.49 & Jul 08 2005 & 3 & 5 & 30 \\
303: NGC~4660 & 11.11 & Jan 11 2005 & 3 & 5 & 40 \\
304: \hline
305: %\enddata
306: \end{tabular}
307: \end{table}
308: %\end{center}
309: \section{Observations and data reduction}
310: {\mybold Standard Staring mode short SL1 (7.5${\mu}$m-15.3${\mu}$m),
311: SL2 (5${\mu}$m-7.6${\mu}$m)
312: and long LL2 (14.1${\mu}$m-21.3${\mu}$m),
313: low resolution (R$\sim$64-128)} IRS spectral
314: observations of 17 early type galaxies, were obtained
315: during the first {\em Spitzer} {\mybold General Observer} Cycle.
316: The galaxies were selected among those that define
317: the colour magnitude relation of Virgo cluster (Bower, Lucy \& Ellis 1992).
318: The observing log is given in Table 1. We also
319: report, in columns 4 and 5, the number of {\mybold cycles of 60
320: and 120 seconds exposures} performed with SL1/2 and LL2, respectively.
321: The spectra were extracted within a fixed aperture (3\farcs{6}$\times$18"
322: for SL)
323: and calibrated using custom made
324: software, tested against the {\tt SMART} software package
325: (Higdon et al. 2004).
326:
327: {\mybold The on-target exposures in each SL segment (e.g. SL1) also provide
328: $\sim$80\arcsec\ offset sky spectra in the complementary module (e.g. SL2)
329: that were used to remove
330: the sky background from the source spectrum in the corresponding segment.
331: Since for the LL module we have obtained only LL2 observations,
332: LL2 spectra were sky-subtracted by differencing observations in the two nod
333: positions.}
334:
335: \subsection{Flux calibration for extended sources}
336: The IRS pipeline version S12 (and older versions) is designed for
337: point source flux extraction.
338: We present here an alternative procedure that exploits
339: the large degree of symmetry that characterizes
340: the light distribution in early type galaxies.
341:
342: We first obtained the real {\mybold e$^-$/sec to Jy} conversion following the procedure outlined by Kennicutt et al. (2003). We have corrected the
343: conversion table provided for point sources by applying
344: the corrections for aperture losses (ALCF) and slit losses (SLCF).
345: The ALCF is due to the residual flux falling outside the
346: aperture selected in the standard calibration pipeline.
347: To estimate the ALCF we used 4 calibration stars (HR 2194,
348: HR 6606, HR 7341 and HR 7891) observed with {\it Spitzer} IRS.
349: Using the {\it Spitzer} Science Center {\tt SPICE} software package
350: we have evaluated the correction resulting
351: from the average ratio of the fluxes extracted within the standard aperture
352: and within twice the standard aperture.
353: The SLCF correction is applied to retrieve the real
354: flux of an observed point source that hits the slit,
355: accounting for the slit losses due to the point spread function
356: of the optical combination (SLCF).
357: It is defined as the wavelength dependent ratio between the whole
358: flux of a point source on the {\mybold field of view} and the flux
359: selected by the slit to hit the detector. To obtain this correction
360: we have simulated the point spread function of the system
361: (PSF) using the Spitzer-adapted
362: {\tt Tiny Tim} code and adopting a ``hat'' beam transmission
363: function of the slit.
364:
365: %\subsection{Intrinsic flux of the extended sources}
366: After the ALCF and SLCF corrections were applied
367: we obtained the flux {\sl received} by the slit within a given aperture.
368: The estimate of the flux {\sl emitted} by an extended source within the selected angular
369: aperture of the slit involves the deconvolution of the received
370: flux with the PSF of the instrument. This correction is important
371: to obtain the shape of the intrinsic spectral energy distribution (SED)
372: of the galaxy, because from the SLCF we have estimated that
373: for a point source the losses due to the PSF amount to
374: about 20\% at 5$\mu$m and to about 40\% at 15$\mu$m. Conversely,
375: a uniform source will not suffer net losses.
376: In order to recover the intrinsic SED we have convolved
377: a surface brightness profile model with the
378: PSF, and we have simulated the corresponding observed linear profile
379: along the slits, taking into account the relative
380: position angles of the slits and the galaxy.
381: The adopted profile is a wavelength dependent two dimensional
382: modified King's law (Elson at al. 1987):
383: \begin{equation}
384: I \equiv I_0 / \left[1+\frac{X^2}{R_{\rm C}^2}+\frac{Y^2}{(R_{\rm C}\times b/a )^2}\right]^{-\gamma/2}
385: \label{elson}
386: \end{equation}
387: %\begin{equation}
388: %I \equiv \frac{I_0}{[1+\frac{X^2}{R_C^2}+\frac{Y^2}{(R_C \times b/a )^2}]^{-\gamma/2}}
389: %\label{elson}
390: %\end{equation}
391: where $X$ and $Y$ are the coordinates along the major and minor axis
392: of the galaxies,
393: $b/a$ is the axial ratio taken from the literature.
394: $I_0$, $R_{\rm C}$ and $\gamma$
395: are free parameters that are
396: functions of the wavelength and are obtained by fitting the
397: observations with the simulated profile.
398: In order to get
399: an accurate determination of the parameters of the profiles several
400: wavelength bins have been co-added.
401: This procedure has a twofold advantage because
402: it allows us to (i) reconstruct the intrinsic profile
403: and the corresponding SED and, (ii)
404: to recognise whether a particular feature is resolved
405: or not.
406: The spectrum, extracted in a fixed width around
407: the maximum intensity, is corrected by the ratio
408: between the intrinsic and observed profile.
409: Since for the LL2 segment the above procedure is generally not as stable as
410: for SL segments, we have preferred to fix $R_{\rm C}$
411: to the corresponding value derived
412: in the nearby wavelength region of the SL segment.
413:
414: {\mybold
415: An estimate of the signal to noise (S/N) ratio was performed by
416: considering two sources of noise: the instrumental plus background noise and the poissonian noise of the source. The former was evaluated
417: by measuring the variance of pixel values in background-subtracted coadded
418: images far from the source.
419: The poissonian noise of the sources was estimated as the square root of the
420: ratio between the variance of the number of e$^-$ extracted per pixel in each exposure, and the number of the exposures.
421: The total noise was obtained by summing the two sources in quadrature and by multiplying by the square root of the
422: extraction width in pixels. The corresponding S/N ratio at 6$\mu$m
423: is shown in column 6 of Table~1.
424:
425: Finally we notice that the overall absolute photometric uncertainty
426: of IRS is 10\%, while the slope deviation within
427: a single segment (affecting all spectra in the same way)
428: is less than 3\% (see the Spitzer Observer Manual).
429: }
430: \begin{figure}
431: \center{\resizebox{0.49\textwidth}{!}{
432: \psfig{figure=f1.eps,clip=}
433: }}
434: %\epsscale{0.6}
435: %\plotone{f1.eps}
436: \caption{IRS spectra (solid lines) of
437: {\sl passively evolving} early-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster.
438: Superimposed are SSP models from Bressan et al. (1998)
439: normalized at 5.5$\mu$m. The dotted line is a 10 Gyr, Z=0.02 SSP computed without accounting for dusty circumstellar envelopes.
440: Dashed lines from bottom to top are 10 Gyr SSPs
441: with metallicity Z=0.008, Z=0.02 and Z=0.05
442: respectively, computed with dusty circumstellar envelopes.
443: The dot--dashed line is a young (5 Gyr) metal poor (Z=0.008)
444: SSP intended to show that also the MIR spectral region suffers
445: from degeneracy. {\mybold The bottom right panel
446: compares the normalized continuum
447: subtracted spectrum of NGC 4365 with the normalized continuum
448: subtracted spectrum of the {\sl mean outflow} AGB star
449: (dashed line, Molster et al. 2002) and the carbon rich star U Cam
450: (dotted line, Sloan et al. 1998).
451: For NGC 4365 the pseudo-continuum is a straight line that
452: interpolates the observed
453: spectrum between $\lambda$=8$\mu$m and $\lambda$=13.5$\mu$m}.
454: The spectrum of NGC 4339 is
455: affected by poorly corrected droops caused by a star falling in the peakup.}
456: \label{passive}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459: \begin{figure}
460: %\center{\resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{
461: %\psfig{figure=f2.eps,clip=}
462: %}}
463: %\epsscale{1.}
464: \plotone{f2.eps}
465: \caption{IRS spectra (solid lines) of
466: {\sl active} early-type galaxies in Virgo.
467: Models are as in Figure \ref{passive}.
468: }
469: \label{active}
470: \end{figure}
471: \section{Results}
472: The final flux calibrated spectra
473: of the selected Virgo cluster early type galaxies are shown
474: in Figures \ref{passive} and \ref{active}.
475:
476: \begin{figure}
477: %\resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{
478: %\center{\resizebox{0.4\textwidth}{!}{
479: %\psfig{figure=f3.eps,clip=}
480: %}}
481: %\epsscale{1.15}
482: \plotone{f3.eps}
483: \caption{{\mybold IRS spectra of NGC 4551 (dotted line) is compared
484: with that of NGC 4365 (solid line).
485: Spectra are normalized at $\lambda$=5.3$\mu$m.}
486: The silicate features in NGC 4551 are less pronounced
487: than in the case of NGC 4365, indicating a smaller dust mass-loss rate
488: that can be attributed either to an older age or to a lower metallicity.
489: }
490: \label{comp}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: \subsection{Silicate emission from evolved stars}
494: {\mybold In Figure \ref{passive} we have collected
495: the thirteen galaxies (76\% of the sample) whose IRS spectra
496: are characterised by the presence of a broad emission feature
497: around $\lambda\sim$10$\mu$m that extends toward longer wavelengths.
498: These galaxies show neither PAH features nor emission lines.}
499: The observed spectra (solid lines) are superimposed on old SSP from Bressan et al.
500: (1998) normalized at $\lambda\sim$5.3$\mu$m. The dotted line is a 10 Gyr, Z=0.02 {
501: \mybold (solar metallicity)} SSP computed without accounting for dusty
502: circumstellar envelopes. Dashed lines from bottom to top refer to 10 Gyr SSPs with
503: increasing metallicity Z=0.008, Z=0.02 and Z=0.05, computed with dusty
504: silicate circumstellar envelopes.
505: {\mybold The models that account for dusty circumstellar envelopes
506: show an extended feature due to silicate emission, which is
507: very similar to that observed.
508: The feature gets stronger at decreasing age and/or at increasing metallicity
509: due to the corresponding higher dust mass loss rate of the SSP.}
510: Since, in addition to the match with the models,
511: the analysis of the intrinsic spatial profile
512: indicates that the whole spectrum is extended, we argue that
513: the observed features are of stellar origin and
514: most likely arise from dusty circumstellar envelopes
515: of mass-losing, evolved stars.
516: {\mybold To corroborate this possibility we compare,
517: in Fig. \ref{passive}, the
518: normalized continuum--subtracted 10$\mu$m silicate emission
519: of the {\sl mean outflow} oxygen-rich AGB star
520: (Molster et al. 2002) and of U Cam (a carbon rich star with SiC emission,
521: Sloan et al. 1998) with that of NGC 4365.
522: Though early type galaxies are expected to harbour carbon stars,
523: given the wide metallicity spread within a galaxy,
524: it seems that the dominant contribution comes from evolved M giants.
525: More detailed models, fully accounting for the expected mixture
526: of evolved stars, will be presented in a forthcoming paper.}
527:
528: The MIR view of early type galaxies proves to be a strong diagnostic for
529: the population content of these galaxies. Recently Temi et al. (2005)
530: noticed that the IRAC flux ratios at 8$\mu$m and 3.6$\mu$m or MIPS 24$\mu$m
531: to IRAC 3.6$\mu$m flux ratio remain fairly constant in early type galaxies
532: which otherwise show different H$\beta$ strength. They conclude that this
533: disagreement supports a small rejuvenation episode. Although this is one of
534: the possibilities invoked by Bressan et al. (1996) to explain early type
535: galaxies with strong Balmer line absorptions,
536: caution must be paid before drawing definite conclusions.
537: Indeed, we show in Figure \ref{passive} that
538: a young (5 Gyr) more metal poor (Z=0.008) SSP, dot--dashed line,
539: is very similar to an old, more
540: metal rich one. Thus even the mid infrared spectral region is degenerate
541: and in order to break the age-metallicity degeneracy in
542: passively evolved systems a careful combined optical ({\mybold including} possibly NIR) and MIR analysis is required.
543: {\mybold To further illustrate the strength of this kind of analysis,
544: we show in Figure \ref{comp} a comparison of the IRS spectra
545: of NGC 4551 and NGC 4365.
546: A recent optical spectroscopic study (Yamada et al. 2006) indicates
547: that NGC 4551 is significantly younger and more metal rich
548: than NGC 4365. In this case we would expect NGC 4551 to be richer in bright
549: mass-losing AGB stars than
550: NGC 4365, and its silicate features to be more prominent.
551: However, the opposite is observed, suggesting that
552: NGC 4551 is either older or more metal poor (or both) than NGC 4365.
553: Evidently, the effects of degeneracy in the optical can be strong
554: (see e.g. Denicol\'o et al. 2005, Annibali et al. 2006).
555:
556: We finally notice that NGC~4473 was observed by ISO
557: (Xilouris et al. 2004) and shows
558: spatially extended emission at 6.7 and 15$\mu$m.
559: These authors measured a 15$\mu$m excess
560: with respect to SSP models {\sl without} dusty circumstellar
561: envelopes. The excess was interpreted as due to hot diffuse
562: interstellar dust.
563: IRS spectra, such as those presented here, permit the
564: disentangling of the
565: contribution of evolved AGB stars and the presence of interstellar dust.}
566:
567: \subsection{{\sl Active} galaxies}
568: The remaining four galaxies (24\% of the sample) display
569: different signatures of {\it activity} in the MIR spectra (Figure \ref{active}).
570: These galaxies are classified as active from optical
571: studies (from AGN to transition Liner-HII) at odds with the former group.
572: {\mybold The spectra of NGC 4636 and NGC 4486 (M~87) show emission lines
573: ([ArII]7$\mu$m, [NeII]12.8$\mu$m, [NeIII]15.5$\mu$m and [SIII]18.7$\mu$m)
574: possibly of non-stellar origin.
575: The broad continuum feature at 10$\mu$m in NGC~4486 is not spatially extended and likely due to
576: silicate emission from the dusty torus (Siebenmorgen et al. 2005; Hao et al. 2005).
577: Line emission in NGC 4636 falls on top of the circumstellar emission SED
578: and, as for NGC 4473, its excess at 15$\mu$m is of stellar origin
579: and not due to emission by hot diffuse dust as suggested by
580: Ferrari et al. (2002).}
581:
582: The spectrum of NGC~4550 shows PAH emissions features
583: (at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3 and 12.7 $\mu$m) and the H$_2$ S(5) 6.9$\mu$m and
584: S(3) 9.66$\mu$m emission lines.
585: NGC~4435 shows a typical star-forming spectrum.
586: A preliminary interpretation suggests that an unresolved starburst is
587: dominating the MIR emission (Panuzzo et al. in preparation).
588:
589:
590: \section{Conclusions}
591: We presented {\it Spitzer} MIR IRS spectra of early type
592: galaxies selected along the colour-magnitude relation of the Virgo cluster.
593:
594: {\mybold We have reconstructed the intrinsic SED of these galaxies
595: from the observed spatial profile sampled by the slits,
596: via a careful analysis of PSF effects.
597: In this way we are also able to differentiate between
598: spatially resolved and unresolved regions within the spectrum.
599: This provides independent support for the interpretation of their nature.}
600:
601: Most of the galaxies (76\%) show an
602: excess at 10$\mu$m and longward which appears spatially
603: extended and is likely due to silicate emission.
604: This class of spectra do not show any other emission features.
605: We argue that the 10$\mu$m excess arises
606: from mass-losing evolved stars, as predicted by adequate SSP
607: models. A detailed modelling of these features
608: together with the analysis of combined optical, NIR and MIR spectra
609: will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
610:
611: In the remaining smaller fraction (24\%) we detect signatures of {\it activity}
612: at different levels. We observe line emission superimposed on the stellar
613: silicate features in NGC 4636, unresolved line and silicate emission in
614: M~87 that likely originate in the dusty torus and unresolved PAH emission
615: in NGC 4550 and NGC 4435. The latter galaxy displays the
616: main characteristics of a nuclear starburst (Panuzzo et al. in preparation).
617:
618: If we exclude M~87, which is a well known AGN, only two out of 16 early-type
619: galaxies observed show PAHs, which corresponds to quite a low fraction
620: ($\sim$12\%) of the observed sample. It is premature to conclude that such a
621: low fraction of galaxies with PAHs is representative of the cluster
622: early-type galaxy population, especially if we consider that our investigation
623: is limited to the brightest cluster members (the upper two magnitudes
624: of the colour-magnitude relation). A detailed comparison of our results with
625: those obtained for field galaxies will cast light on the role of
626: environment in the galaxy evolution process.
627:
628: \begin{acknowledgements}
629: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which
630: is operated by the JPL, Caltech
631: under a contract with NASA. We thank J.D.T. Smith for helpful suggestions on the
632: IRS flux calibration procedure and the anonymous referee for useful suggestions.
633: A. B., G.L. G. and L. S. thank INAOE for warm hospitality.
634: \end{acknowledgements}
635:
636: \begin{thebibliography}{}
637: \bibitem[1998]{Annibali05} Annibali, F., Bressan, A., Rampazzo, R. Danese, L., \& Zeilinger, W.W. 2006, \aap, submitted
638: \bibitem[Athey et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...571..272A} Athey, A., Bregman, J., Bregman, J., Temi, P., \& Sauvage, M.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 272
639: \bibitem[1998]{Breg98} Bregman, J. N., Athey, A. E., Bregman, J.D., \& Temi, P. 1998, AAS, 193, 0903
640: \bibitem[1992]{Bowe92} Bower, R. G., Lucey, J. R., \& Ellis, R. S. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 601
641: \bibitem[Bressan et al.(1996)]{1996A&A...311..425B} Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., \& Tantalo, R.\ 1996, \aap, 311, 425
642: \bibitem[1998]{Bres98} Bressan, A., Granato, G.L., \& Silva, L. 1998, AA, 332, 135
643: \bibitem[Bressan et al.(2001)]{2001ApSSS.277..251B} Bressan, A. et al.\ 2001, \apss, 277, 251
644: \bibitem[Denicol{\'o} et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.358..813D} Denicol{\'o}, G., Terlevich, R., Terlevich, E., Forbes, D.~A., \& Terlevich, A.\ 2005, \mnras, 358, 813
645: \bibitem[Elson et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...323...54E} Elson, R.~A.~W., Fall, S.~M., \& Freeman, K.~C.\ 1987, \apj, 323, 54
646: \bibitem[Ferrari et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...389..355F} Ferrari, F., Pastoriza, M.~G., Macchetto, F.~D., Bonatto, C., Panagia, N., \& Sparks, W.~B.\ 2002, \aap, 389, 355
647: \bibitem[Hao et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...625L..75H} Hao, L. et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 625, L75
648: \bibitem[2004]{Higd04} Higdon, S.J.U. et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975
649: \bibitem[2004]{Houc04} Houck, J.R. 2004, ApJS, 154, 18
650: \bibitem[1986]{Impe86} Impey, C.D., Wynn-Williams, C.G., \& Becklin, E.E. 1986, ApJ, 309, 572
651: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2003)]{2003PASP..115..928K} Kennicutt, R.~C. et al.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 928
652: \bibitem[Molster et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...382..222M} Molster, F.~J., Waters,
653: L.~B.~F.~M., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 2002, \aap, 382, 222
654: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...436L...5S} Siebenmorgen, R.,
655: Haas, M., Kr{\"u}gel, E., \& Schulz, B.\ 2005, \aap, 436, L5
656: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....115..809S} Sloan, G.~C.,
657: Little-Marenin, I.~R., \& Price, S.~D.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 809
658: \bibitem[2004]{Temi05} Temi, P., Brighenti, F., \& Mathews, W.G. 2005, \apj, 635, L25
659: \bibitem[2004]{Wern04} Werner, M.W. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
660: \bibitem[Xilouris et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...416...41X} Xilouris, E.~M. et al. 2004, \aap, 416, 41
661: \bibitem[Yamada et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...637..200Y} Yamada, Y., Arimoto, N.,
662: Vazdekis, A., \& Peletier, R.~F.\ 2006, \apj, 637, 200
663: \end{thebibliography}
664: \end{document}
665:
666: