1: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{psfig}
4: \usepackage{apjfonts}
5: \usepackage{mathrsfs}
6: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
7:
8: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9:
10: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
11:
12: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
13:
14: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
15:
16: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
17:
18: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
19: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
20: %% use the longabstract style option.
21:
22: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
23:
24: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
25: \newcommand{\myemail}{antonio.sollima@bo.astro.it}
26:
27: \shorttitle{New Metallicities of RRL Stars in $\omega$~Cen}
28: \shortauthors{Sollima et al.}
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{New Metallicities of RR Lyrae Stars in $\omega$~Centauri:
33: Evidence for a Non He-Enhanced Metal-Intermediate
34: Population\thanks{Based on FLAMES/GIRAFFE
35: observations collected with the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern
36: Observatory, Cerro Paranal, Chile, within the
37: observing programs 74.B-0170(A).}}
38:
39: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
40: %% author and affiliation information.
41: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
42: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
43: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
44: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
45:
46: \author{A. Sollima\altaffilmark{1}, J. Borissova\altaffilmark{2,3},
47: M. Catelan\altaffilmark{4}, H. A. Smith\altaffilmark{5}, D.
48: Minniti\altaffilmark{4},
49: C. Cacciari\altaffilmark{6} and F. R. Ferraro\altaffilmark{1}}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{1}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}
52: \altaffiltext{2}{European Southern Observatory, Avenida Alonso de C\'{o}rdova 3107, 763-0581 Vitacura, Santiago 19, Chile}
53: \altaffiltext{3}{Departamento de F\'isica y Meteorolog\'ia, Universidad de Valpara\'{\i}so,
54: Ave. Gran Breta\~na 644, Playa Ancha, Casilla 53, Valpara\'iso, Chile}
55: \altaffiltext{4}{Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile, Departamento de Astronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, Av. Vicu\~na Mackenna 4860,
56: 782-0436 Santiago, Chile}
57: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824}
58: \altaffiltext{6}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I-40127 Bologna, Italy}
59:
60: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
61: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
62: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
63: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
64: %% editorial office after submission.
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We present new spectroscopic metal abundances for
68: 74 RR Lyrae stars in $\omega$~Cen obtained with FLAMES. The
69: well-known metallicity spread is visible among the RR Lyrae
70: variables. The metal-intermediate (MInt) RR Lyrae
71: stars (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.2$) are fainter than the bulk of
72: the dominant metal-poor population (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.7$),
73: in good agreement with the corresponding zero-age horizontal branch
74: models with
75: cosmological helium abundance $Y = 0.246$. This result
76: conflicts with the hypothesis that the progenitors of the
77: MInt RR Lyrae stars correspond to the anomalous
78: blue main-sequence stars, which share a
79: similar metallicity but whose properties are currently
80: explained by assuming for them a large helium enhancement.
81: Therefore, in this scenario, the coexistence within the cluster
82: of two different populations with similar
83: metallicities (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.2$) and different helium
84: abundances has to be considered.
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: \keywords{techniques: spectroscopic --- stars: abundances ---
88: stars: Population II --- stars: variables: RR Lyrae ---
89: globular clusters: \objectname{$\omega$~Cen}}
90:
91: \section{Introduction}
92:
93: The stellar system $\omega$~Centauri (NGC 5139) is the
94: most massive and luminous globular cluster of the Milky
95: Way, and is the only one showing a clear metallicity
96: spread. Extensive spectroscopic surveys performed on large
97: samples of giant stars (Norris et al. 1996;
98: Suntzeff \& Kraft 1996) have found a multimodal
99: distribution of heavy elements. Recent photometric surveys
100: have revealed the presence of multiple sequences in the
101: color-magnitude diagram (CMD) of $\omega$~Cen. In
102: particular, a discrete structure of the red giant branch
103: (RGB) and subgiant branch (SGB) has been evinced (Lee
104: et al. 1999; Pancino et al. 2000; Rey et al. 2004; Ferraro
105: et al. 2004; Sollima et al. 2005a), indicating a complex
106: formation history. In addition to the dominant metal-poor
107: population (MP, ${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.7$), three
108: metal-intermediate (MInt) components (spanning a range
109: of metallicity $-1.3 < {\rm [Fe/H]} < -1.0$) and an
110: extreme metal-rich population (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -0.6$) have
111: been identified (Norris \& Da Costa 1995; Smith et al.
112: 2000; Pancino et al. 2002; Vanture et al. 2002).
113: In the faint part of the CMD, Anderson (2002) and Bedin et
114: al. (2004) discovered an additional blue main sequence
115: (bMS, comprising $\sim$ 30\% of all MS stars) running
116: parallel to the dominant one. According to stellar models
117: with canonical chemical abundances, the location of the
118: observed bMS would suggest a lower metallicity. However,
119: Piotto et al. (2005), from a spectroscopic analysis of
120: 34 stars belonging to both MS components, found that the
121: bMS stars are $\sim 0.3$~dex more metal-rich than the
122: dominant cluster population, and
123: therefore might be associated with one of the MInt
124: components identified from the RGBs. The explanation
125: currently proposed to account for the anomalous position
126: of the bMS in the CMD is a significant helium enhancement
127: (by $\Delta Y \sim 0.10 -0.15$) for this stellar population
128: (Norris 2004).
129:
130: RR Lyrae stars (RRL), being representatives of the oldest populations, are
131: important tracers of the formation history of $\omega$~Cen.
132: The first sign of peculiarities in the RRL variables of $\omega$~Cen was
133: found by Freeman \& Rodgers (1975), who observed a wide spread in
134: metallicity in a sample of 25 RRL. This result was later confirmed by
135: Butler, Dickens, \& Epps (1978) and Gratton, Tornamb\`e, \& Ortolani (1986).
136: More recently, Rey et al. (2000) derived metallicities for 131 RRL stars from
137: the $hk$ index of the Ca$by$ photometric system.
138:
139: We present here new metallicities for 74 RRL stars of
140: $\omega$~Cen, and discuss the implications of
141: helium enhancement on the location in the CMD and the pulsational properties of
142: the MInt group of RRL stars.
143: %Our idea, in the present {\em Letter}, is to utilize the RRL stars,
144: %whose detailed properties, especially their luminosities and periods, are
145: %sensitive to the parameters involved in shaping the morphology of the
146: %horizontal branch, as a ``vertical diagnostic'' of horizontal branch
147: %morphology (Catelan, Sweigart, \& Borissova 1998).
148: This can be
149: useful in constraining the extent to which a spread in helium may or not
150: be present in the cluster.
151:
152: \section{Data Analysis}
153:
154: Observations of 74 RRL variables (38 RRab and 36 RRc) were
155: collected on February and March 2005 at the VLT/UT2 at ESO (Cerro
156: Paranal, Chile) with the multi-fiber spectrograph
157: FLAMES/MEDUSA. We used the
158: high-resolution grating HR13 with a spectral coverage of
159: 285~\AA\
160: (6120-6405~\AA) and a resolving power $R \sim 22500$.
161: For each star we obtained three exposures (3000~s +
162: 3600~s + 3600~s) secured in good seeing conditions ($FWHM <
163: 0.8\arcsec$), reaching an average $S/N~\sim~40$ per pixel. The
164: one-dimensional spectra were extracted using the GIRAFFE
165: pipeline. Thirty fibers were dedicated to sky observations in
166: each exposure. An average sky spectrum was obtained and
167: subtracted from the object spectra, by taking into account
168: the different fiber transmission. The spectra were then
169: continuum normalized with IRAF.
170:
171: A set of 26 metal lines was selected from the database of
172: Kurucz \& Bell (1995) in the spectral range covered by our
173: spectra. These lines were identified, whenever possible,
174: on each spectrum, and were fit with Gaussian functions,
175: whose centers provided the observed wavelength. The integral
176: of the difference between the continuum and the line profile
177: provided the equivalent width (EW) of each line. The
178: abundance analysis was performed using the latest version
179: of Kurucz (1979) model atmospheres\footnote{The effect of a helium overabundance
180: of $\Delta Y = 0.1$ on the model atmosphere is to
181: decrease the continuum opacity, thus enhancing the line strength by $\sim 5\%$
182: (corresponding to $\sim 0.03$~dex; B\"ohm-Vitense 1979). Given the small impact of
183: such an effect, we adopted model atmospheres with a standard helium abundance.}
184: and the MOOG line analysis code (Sneden 1973) to compute LTE abundances from
185: individual EWs. The abundance was derived from the model
186: that best reproduced the observed EWs, for assumed values
187: of temperature, gravity and microturbulence velocity. The
188: errors on the abundances were calculated as the standard
189: deviation of the abundance relative to all the measured
190: lines.
191:
192: Temperatures were derived from $V\!-\!K$ colors during the
193: phase interval between the beginning and the end of each
194: observation, using the $V$ light curves provided by Kaluzny
195: et al. (2004). The mean $K$ magnitude of each
196: star was derived from the infrared catalog by Sollima et al.
197: (2004) and corrected for the phase effect using the
198: template $K$ light curves by Jones et al.
199: (1996).\footnote{Dereddened $(V\!-\!K)_0$ colors were
200: computed adopting the reddening and extinction coefficients
201: $E(\bv)=0.11$ (Lub 2002), $A_V=3.1~E(\bv)$ and
202: $A_K=0.38~E(\bv)$ (Savage \& Mathis 1979). Temperatures
203: were then derived using the
204: color-temperature conversions by Montegriffo et al. (1998).}
205: As an
206: independent check, we derived the temperature of each star
207: directly from its spectrum by minimizing the trend in the
208: deduced abundances with the excitation potential for the
209: observed Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines. The two
210: measurements agree with each other to within $\sim 100$~K
211: for most of the RRL in our sample.
212:
213: The gravity parameter $\log g$ was then calculated from the universal gravitation
214: law.\footnote{The gravity was calculated using the distance modulus $(m\!-\!M)_0=13.70$
215: (Bellazzini et al. 2004), the reddening and
216: extinction coefficients listed above and the bolometric corrections by
217: Montegriffo et al. (1998).
218: The mass of the RRL stars was calculated from the stellar
219: pulsation theory using the relations of Marconi et al. (2003, their eq. 2).}
220: The microturbulence velocity was initially set as $\xi=2~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$, following
221: Fokin \& Gillet (1997), and then adjusted within a range of about $1~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$
222: by minimizing the trend in the deduced abundances
223: with EWs for Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines.
224:
225: We performed the spectral analysis independently on each exposure adopting the
226: extreme values reached by the parameters during the observation, and
227: assumed the corresponding abundances as upper and lower limits.
228: Spectra taken during maximum light were rejected because of non-LTE effects
229: due to shock wave phenomena.
230:
231: \section{Results}
232:
233: The metallicities derived for the 74 observed RRL stars are listed in Table~1.
234: The metallicity distribution is shown in Fig.~\ref{hist}. The KMM test
235: (Ashman, Bird, \& Zepf 1994) performed on our metallicity distribution
236: rejects the single Gaussian model at the 99.9\% confidence level, supporting a bimodal distribution
237: that peaks at ${\rm [Fe/H]}=-1.72$ and $-1.22$ (MP and MInt groups, respectively) with an
238: estimated common covariance 0.02.
239: A detailed comparison with the metallicities measured by Rey et al. (2000)
240: indicates a systematic offset
241: $\Delta {\rm [Fe/H]} \mbox{(this work--Rey)} = -0.06$~dex, with a dispersion
242: of $\sim 0.3$~dex.
243: Since the accuracy of both sets of results is $\sim 0.3$~dex,
244: the observed dispersion is consistent with the above uncertainties.
245: %One of the strongest spectral features evident in the covered spectral range is
246: %the Ba II line at $\lambda~6141.7 \AA$. This feature allowed us to measure
247: %$[Ba/Fe]$ abundance ratios for most of the RRL stars of our sample.
248: %Unfortunately, since the analysis is based only on a single Ba line, the obtained abundances
249: %can be interpreted only in a relative sense. We observed that all the 10
250: %sub-luminous (i.e. metal-rich) RRL stars present an overabundance of
251: %$\Delta [Ba/Fe]~\sim~1.0~dex$ with respect to the bulk of metal-poor RRL.
252: %This result is in agreement with the results obtained on red giants by
253: %Pancino et al. (2002).
254:
255: The location in the HR diagram of the RRL stars in our
256: sample\footnote{We transformed the $M_K$ magnitudes and
257: $(V\!-\!K)_0$ colors into luminosities and temperatures using
258: a distance modulus $(m\!-\!M)_0=13.70$ (Bellazzini et al.
259: 2004), as well as color transformations and $K$-band bolometric
260: corrections by Montegriffo et al. (1998). The colors were
261: corrected for the non-static atmosphere using the
262: correction by Bono, Caputo, \& Stellingwerf (1995).} is shown in
263: Fig.~\ref{hr}. As can be seen, the dominant MP RRL population
264: (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.7$) has a mean luminosity
265: $\langle \log(L/L_{\odot})\rangle \sim 1.69$, whereas MInt RRL
266: (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.2$) are systematically fainter, with
267: $\langle \log(L/L_{\odot})\rangle \sim 1.62$. This evidence is in agreement
268: with the results by Rey et al. (2000). For comparison, we
269: show three zero-age horizontal branch (ZAHB)
270: models\footnote{The ZAHBs were calculated
271: using the FRANEC code (Straniero, Chieffi, \& Limongi
272: 1997). The location in the CMD was interpolated from the
273: tracks of stars with masses ranging from 0.52 to 0.80~$M_\odot$.}
274: with ${\rm [Fe/H]}=-1.7$ and $Y=0.246$, ${\rm [Fe/H]}=-1.2$
275: and $Y=0.246$, and ${\rm [Fe/H]}=-1.2$ and $Y=0.35$. The ZAHB models
276: with $Y=0.246$ fit nicely the lower envelopes of the
277: respective MP and MInt RRL stars. Conversely, the
278: helium-enhanced ($Y=0.35$) MInt model is far too bright and
279: does not match the observed MInt RRL stars.
280:
281: Fig.~\ref{Oosth} shows the location of the RRab Lyrae in our sample in the
282: period-amplitude diagram. For comparison, the mean locus of the M3 (Oosterhoff I
283: type; Cacciari et al. 2005) and M92 (Oosterhoff II type) RRab Lyrae
284: variables are overplotted in this figure.
285: As can be noted, the stars of the MInt and MP samples occupy
286: different regions of the diagram: while MInt stars do not show significant deviations from
287: the M3\footnote{Note that M3 is a good reference cluster
288: for the MInt RRL population in spite of its lower metal abundance,
289: because metallicity does not have a significant effect on the period-amplitude
290: distribution in globular clusters belonging to the same Oosterhoff group
291: (Cacciari et al. 2005).} period-amplitude relation, MP stars have
292: longer periods and fall nicely on the M92 period-amplitude relation.
293: . In this respect, the effect of a He enhancement on
294: the MInt RRL would be to produce longer periods, as a consequence of the
295: higher luminosities involved (Catelan 1996).
296:
297: An independent check on the helium abundance can be made using
298: the mass-luminosity parameter $A$ (Caputo, Cayrel, \& Cayrel
299: de Strobel 1983; Sandquist 2000).
300: %\begin{eqnarray*}
301: % A & = & 0.81~\log\left(\frac{M}{M_\odot}\right) - \log\left(\frac{L}{L_\odot}\right) \\
302: % & = & 13.353-1.19~\log\,P+4.058~\log\,T_{eff}.
303: %\end{eqnarray*}
304: %\noindent
305: This parameter
306: depends on the helium abundance in the sense that, at a fixed
307: mass and for a given temperature, increasing the helium abundance
308: increases the luminosity, and thereby the period, of an RRL
309: star. Although $A$
310: has a relatively low sensitivity to the helium abundance,
311: statistical errors are generally small ($\sigma_A \sim
312: 0.05$), and this method may provide some useful
313: indications in regard to (at least) relative helium abundances.
314: We derived $A$ values for the 74 RRL stars in our sample using eq. 8 of
315: Cacciari et al. (2005), and
316: converted these values into $Y$ differences with respect to
317: the mean $Y$ of the MP stars assuming
318: $\delta A/\delta Y = 1.4$ (Sandage 1990; Bencivenni et al.
319: 1991). Figure~\ref{helium} shows the obtained values of $\Delta Y$
320: as a function of metallicity. As can be seen, there is no evidence
321: of a systematic trend with metallicity to within the errors
322: ($\sigma_Y = 0.07$).
323:
324: \section{Discussion}
325:
326: The most important result of this analysis is the
327: confirmation of the existence of a metal-intermediate
328: (${\rm [Fe/H]}\sim-1.2$) RRL population in $\omega$~Cen with
329: luminosity and pulsational properties that are {\em
330: incompatible with any significant helium overabundance}.
331: This evidence adds new complexity to the scenario proposed
332: to explain the origin of the bMS. In fact, while
333: spectroscopic analyses suggest that the bMS (Piotto
334: et al. 2005) and the MInt RRL share a similar
335: metallicity (${\rm [Fe/H]} \sim -1.2$), the results presented in
336: this {\em Letter} demonstrate that they cannot share the same
337: helium abundance. On the other hand, a helium-rich
338: population is not expected to produce a sizeable RRL component
339: (Lee et al. 2005), unless a fairly large age difference with
340: respect to the dominant population of $\omega$~Cen ($\Delta
341: t \gtrsim 4$~Gyr, in the sense that the He-enriched population
342: should be younger) is assumed, in contrast with the results by
343: Hilker et al. (2004) and Sollima et al. (2005b), who both
344: found a rather small ($\lesssim 2$~Gyr) age difference between
345: these two populations of $\omega$~Cen.
346:
347: Therefore, following these considerations, two populations with
348: similar metallicities but very
349: different helium abundances seem to coexist within the cluster.
350: This possibility is still compatible with the
351: complexity of the population mix observed at the SGB level
352: (see Ferraro et al. 2004; Sollima et al. 2005b), and sets
353: severe constraints on the helium enrichment mechanism
354: and its timescale.
355:
356: As a matter of fact, in the framework of the self-enrichment
357: scenario, the huge
358: helium enrichment required to explain the
359: anomalous position of the bMS in the CMD has to occur
360: after the entire MP and (at least part of)
361: the MInt population (comprising $\sim 70\%$ of the whole cluster population)
362: were already formed without any significant helium enhancement.
363: Then, the MInt He-rich population has to be formed from a gas enriched in
364: helium by $\Delta Y\sim 0.10-0.15$ maintaining its metal
365: abundance practically unchanged.
366: Under this assumption, if the sources of the helium enrichment are
367: intermediate-mass stars with $M \sim 3-6 \, M_{\odot}$
368: (as suggested by D'Antona \& Caloi 2004), then
369: the entire chemical enrichment of the system has to occur
370: over a time-scale of $\sim 50-300$~Myr. Moreover, a
371: very efficient mechanism is required in order to homogenize and
372: efficiently reuse all the ``enriched'' material ejected by the
373: previous generation of polluting stars (Norris 2004).
374: In this respect, further support to this scenario could come from
375: new evidence suggesting that a similar helium self-enrichment
376: may have occurred also in the metal-homogeneous
377: globular cluster NGC~2808 (Lee et al. 2005; D'Antona
378: et al. 2005; see also Catelan 2006 for a recent, critical
379: discussion). Also in this case, no He-rich RRL have been found in the cluster
380: (Corwin et al. 2004; D'Antona et al. 2005)
381:
382: Alternatively, scenarios outside the ``pure self-enrichment'' one
383: may also be considered; in particular, one possibility could be that the MInt
384: populations formed in a different environment, thus not partaking the
385: chemical enrichment process of $\omega$~Cen. In this
386: case, a complex interplay of chemical and dynamical evolution has to be
387: taken into account, including gas exchange with the Milky Way and/or minor
388: mergers, within a framework such as the binary cluster mergers scenario
389: (Minniti et al. 2004).
390:
391: Alternative scenarios which try to reproduce the anomalous location of the bMS
392: without invoking a helium overabundance
393: are not much simpler and present even more
394: obvious inconsistencies with observations. For example, if we assume that
395: MInt RRL and bMS belong to the same population (with the
396: same cosmological helium abundance), then the anomalous position of the bMS
397: can only be explained by assuming
398: a different (longer) distance modulus [$\Delta
399: (m\!-\!M)_0\sim~0.4$~mag, corresponding to $\sim 1.1$~kpc behind
400: the main body of the cluster]. This would be
401: inconsistent with the MInt RRL luminosity shown in Fig. 2,
402: which suggests that MInt RRL are at the same distance as the
403: MP population. Moreover, Piotto et al. (2005) found that bMS stars
404: show the same radial velocity distribution of the MP group,
405: implying that the bMS and the main body of $\omega$~Cen are
406: at least dynamically bound to each other.
407:
408: The results presented in this analysis add new questions in
409: the interpretation of the complex metal enrichment history
410: of $\omega$~Cen. However, this additional piece of
411: information is important to define a scenario able to explain
412: the inhomogeneous chemical enrichment of the stellar
413: populations of this system.
414:
415: \acknowledgments
416:
417: This research was supported by the Ministero dell'Istruzione Universit\`a e Ricerca.
418: We thank the anonymous referee for his helpful comments and suggestions.
419: Support for M.C. was provided by Proyecto FONDECYT Regular No.~1030954.
420: D.M. is grateful for the support
421: by the FONDAP Center for Astrophysics 15010003, by the European Southern Observatory
422: Visitor programme, and by a Fellowship from the John
423: Simon Guggenheim Foundation. HAS thanks the NSF for support under
424: grant AST 0205813.
425:
426: \begin{thebibliography}{}
427: %
428: \bibitem[Anderson (2002)]{A02} Anderson, J. 2002, in $\omega$~Centauri: A Unique Window
429: into Astrophysics, ed. F. van Leeuwen, J. D. Huges, \& G. Piotto, ASP Conf. Series, 87
430: \bibitem[Ashman et al.(1994)]{As04} Ashman, K. M., Bird, C. M., \& Zepf, S. E.
431: 1994, \aj, 108, 2348
432: \bibitem[Bedin et al.(2004)]{B04} Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., Anderson, J., et al. 2004,
433: % Cassisi, S., King, I. R., Momany, Y. \& Carraro, G., 2004,
434: \apjl, 605, L125
435: \bibitem{Be04} Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., Sollima, A., Pancino, E., \& Origlia, L. 2004,
436: \aap, 424, 199
437: \bibitem[Bencivenni et al.(2001)]{B01} Bencivenni, D., Caputo, F., Manteiga, M., \&
438: Quarta, M. L. 1991, \apj, 380, 484
439: \bibitem[B\"ohm-Vitense (1979)]{bv79} B\"ohm-Vitense, E. 1979, \apj, 234, 521
440: \bibitem{B05} Bono, G., Caputo, F., \& Stellingwerf, R. F. 1995, \apjs, 99, 263
441: \bibitem[Butler, Dickens \& Epps (1978)]{BDE78} Butler, D., Dickens, R. J., \&
442: Epps, E. 1978, \apj, 225, 148
443: \bibitem{Ca05} Cacciari, C., Corwin, T. M., \& Carney, B. W. 2005, \aj, 129, 267
444: %\bibitem[Caputo, Cayrel \& Cayrel de Strobel (1983)]{CCC83} Caputo, F., Cayrel,
445: % R.\& Cayrel de Strobel, G., 1983, \aap, 123, 135
446: %\bibitem{C04} Catelan, M., Pritzl, B.J. \& Smith, H.A. 2004, \apjs , 154, 633
447: \bibitem[Catelan(1996)]{c96}
448: Catelan, M. 1996, \aap, 307, L13
449: \bibitem[Catelan(2006)]{c05}
450: Catelan, M. 2006, in Resolved Stellar Populations, ASP Conf. Ser.,
451: ed. D. Valls-Gabaud \& M. Ch\'avez (San Francisco: ASP), in press (astro-ph/0507464)
452: % \bibitem[Catelan, Sweigart, \& Borissova(1998)]{mcea98} Catelan, M., Sweigart,
453: % A. V., \& Borissova, J. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 135, A Half-Century of Stellar
454: % Pulsation Interpretations, ed. P. A. Bradley \& J. A. Guzik (San Francisco:
455: % ASP), 41
456: \bibitem[Corwin et al.(2004)]{tmcea04} Corwin, T.~M., Catelan, M., Borissova, J.,
457: \& Smith, H.~A.\ 2004, \aap, 421, 667
458: \bibitem{D05} D'Antona, F., Bellazzini, M., Caloi, V., et al.
459: % , Fusi Pecci, F., Galleti, S., \&
460: % Rood, R. T.
461: 2005, \apj, 631, 868
462: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Caloi (2004)]{DC04} D'Antona, F., \& Caloi, V. 2004, \apj,
463: 611, 871
464: \bibitem[Ferraro et al. (2004)]{F04} Ferraro, F. R., Sollima, A., Pancino, E., et
465: al.
466: % Bellazzini, M.,
467: % Origlia, L., Straniero, O., \& Cool, A.
468: 2004, \apjl, 603, L81 (F04)
469: \bibitem{F97} Fokin, A. B., \& Gillet, D. 1997, \aap, 325, 1013
470: \bibitem{FR75} Freeman, K. C., \& Rodgers, A. W. 1975, \apjl, 201, L71
471: \bibitem[Gratton, Tornamb\`e, \& Ortolani (1986)]{GTO86} Gratton, R. G.,
472: Tornamb\`e, A., \& Ortolani, S. 1986, \aap, 169, 111
473: \bibitem[Hilker et al. (2004)]{H04} Hilker, M., Kayser, A., Richtler, T. \&
474: Willemsen, P. 2004, \aap, 422, L9
475: \bibitem{J96} Jones, V. J., Carney, B. W., \& Fulbright, J. P. 1996, \pasp, 108, 877
476: \bibitem{K97} Kaluzny, J., Olech, A., Thompson, I. et al.,
477: % Pych, W., Krzeminski, \& Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A.
478: 2004, \aap, 424, 1101
479: \bibitem{K79} Kurucz, R. L. 1979, \apjs, 40, 1
480: \bibitem{K95} Kurucz, R. L., \& Bell, R. 1995, Kurucz CD-ROM No. 23. Cambridge, Mass.:
481: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, .
482: \bibitem[Lee et al.(1999)]{L99} Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., Sohn, Y.-J., et al.
483: % Rey, S.-C., Lee, H.-c., \& Walker, A. R.,
484: 1999, Nature, 402, 55
485: \bibitem{L05} Lee, Y.-W., Joo, S.-J., Han, S.-I., et al.
486: % Chung, C., Ree, C. H., Sohn, Y. J., Kim, Y. C., Yoon, S. J., Yi, S. K. \& Demarque, P.,
487: 2005, \apjl, 621, L57
488: \bibitem{L02} Lub, J. 2002, in A Unique Window into Astrophysics, ed. F. van Leeuwen,
489: J. D. Hughes, \& G.Piotto, ASP Conf.Series, Vol. 265, 95
490: \bibitem{M04} Marconi, M., Caputo, F., Di Criscienzo, M., \& Castellani, M. 2003, \apj,
491: 596, 299
492: \bibitem{Mi04} Minniti, D., Rejkuba, M., Funes, S. J., et al.
493: % José G., \& Kennicutt, R. C.,
494: 2004, \apj, 612, 215
495: \bibitem{monte} Montegriffo, P., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., \& Fusi Pecci, F. 1998,
496: \mnras, 297, 872
497: \bibitem[Norris \& Da Costa (1995)]{NDC95} Norris, J. E., \& Da Costa, G. S.
498: 1995, \apj, 447, 680
499: \bibitem{NFM96} Norris, J. E., Freeman, K. C., \& Mighell, K. J. 1996, \apj, 462, 241
500: \bibitem[Norris et al.(1997)]{N97} Norris, J. E., Freeman, K. C., Mayor, M., \&
501: Seitzer, P. 1997, \apjl, 487, L187
502: \bibitem{N04} Norris, J. E. 2004, \apj, 612, L25
503: \bibitem{P00} Pancino, E., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., et al.
504: %Piotto, G., \& Zoccali, M.,
505: 2000, \apjl, 534, L83
506: \bibitem[Pancino et al.(2002)]{P02} Pancino, E., Pasquini, L., Hill, V., et al. 2002,
507: %Ferraro, F. R. \& Bellazzini, M., 2002,
508: \apj, 568, L101 (P02)
509: %\bibitem{Pa03} Pasquini, L., Alonso, J., Avila, G. et al. 2003,
510: % Barriga, P., Biereichel, P., Buzzoni, B., Cavadore, C., Cumani, C., Dekker, H.,
511: % Delabre, B., Kaufer, A., Kotzlowski, H., Hill, V., Lizon, J. L., Nees, W., Santin, P.,
512: % Schmutzer, R., Kesteren, A. V., Zoccali, M., 2003,
513: SPIE, 4841, 1682
514: \bibitem{P05} Piotto, G., Villanova, A., Bedin, L. R., et al.
515: % Gratton, R., Cassisi, S., Momany, Y., Recio-Blanco, A., Lucatello, S., Anderson,
516: % J., King, I. R., Pietrinferni, A. \& Carraro, G.,
517: 2005, \apj, 621, 777
518: \bibitem{R00} Rey, S.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., et al.
519: % Walker, A., \& Baird, S.
520: 2000, \aj, 119, 1824
521: \bibitem[Rey et al.(2004)]{R04} Rey, S.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Ree, C. H., et al.
522: % Joo, J.-M., Sohn, Y.-J.,
523: % \& Walker, A. R.
524: 2004, \aj, 127, 958
525: \bibitem[Sandage (1990)]{S90} Sandage, A. 1990, \apj, 350, 631
526: \bibitem[Sandquist (2000)]{Sa00} Sandquist, E. L. 2000, \mnras, 313, 571
527: \bibitem{sm79} Savage, B. D., \& Mathis, J. S. 1979, \araa, 17, 73
528: %\bibitem[Searle (1977)]{S77} Searle, L. 1977, in {\it The Evolution of Galaxies and
529: % Stellar Populations}, ed. B.M. Tinsley \& R.B. Larson (New Haven: Yale Univ. Obs.), 219
530: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2000)]{S00} Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Cunha, K., et al.
531: % Gallino R., Busso, M., Lambert, D.L. \& Straniero, O.,
532: 2000, \aj, 119, 1239
533: \bibitem{S73} Sneden, C. 1973, \apj, 184, 839
534: \bibitem{S04} Sollima, A., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., et al.
535: % Pancino, E., \& Bellazzini, M.
536: 2004, \aap, 420, 173
537: \bibitem[Sollima et al.(2005a)]{S05} Sollima, A., Ferraro, F. R., Pancino E., \&
538: Bellazzini, M. 2005a, \mnras, 357, 265
539: \bibitem[Sollima et al.(2005b)]{S05b} Sollima, A., Pancino E., Ferraro, F. R., et
540: al.
541: % Bellazzini, M., Straniero, O., \& Pasquini, L.
542: 2005b, \apj, 634, 332
543: \bibitem{SCL97} Straniero, O., Chieffi, A., \& Limongi, M. 1997, \apj, 490, 425
544: \bibitem{SK96} Suntzeff, N. B., \& Kraft, R. P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1913
545: %\bibitem[van de Ven et al.(2006)]{VdV05} van de Ven, G., van den Bosch, R. C. E.,
546: % Verolme, E. K., \& de Zeeuw, P. T. 2006, \aap, 445, 513
547: \bibitem[Vanture et al.(2002)]{V02} Vanture, A. D., Wallerstein, G., \& Suntzeff,
548: N. B. 2002, \apj, 569, 984
549:
550:
551: \end{thebibliography}
552:
553: \clearpage
554:
555: \begin{figure}
556: \plotone{f1.eps}
557: \caption{Metallicity distribution for the 74 observed RRL stars.}
558: \label{hist}
559: \end{figure}
560:
561: \clearpage
562:
563: \begin{figure}
564: \plotone{f2.eps}
565: \caption{HR diagram for the target RRL stars of $\omega$~Cen. Open circles mark stars
566: with ${\rm [Fe/H]}<-1.35$, filled circles mark stars with ${\rm [Fe/H]}>-1.35$.
567: Different lines indicate the ZAHB luminosity for the indicated metallicity and
568: helium abundance combinations. }
569: \label{hr}
570: \end{figure}
571:
572: \clearpage
573:
574: \begin{figure}
575: \plotone{f3.eps}
576: \caption{The period-$V$ amplitude relation for the two metallicity groups of RRab
577: Lyrae in $\omega$~Cen. The solid line indicates the mean locus of the M3 variables,
578: while the dashed line indicates the mean locus of the M92 variables.}
579: \label{Oosth}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582: \clearpage
583:
584: \begin{figure}
585: \plotone{f4.eps}
586: \caption{Relative He abundances computed via the $A$ parameter for the observed
587: RRL stars as a function of metallicity. Symbols are as in Fig.~2}
588: \label{helium}
589: \end{figure}
590: \clearpage
591:
592: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
593: \tablewidth{0pt}
594: \tablecaption{Metallicities and properties of the target RRL}
595: \tablehead{
596: \colhead{OGLE ID} & \colhead{[Fe/H]} &
597: \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm [Fe/H]}$} & \colhead{$\langle V\rangle$} &
598: \colhead{$\langle K \rangle$} & \colhead{$\log\langle T\rangle$} &
599: \colhead{$\log\langle L/L_{\odot}\rangle$} & RRL type &
600: \colhead{$A_{V}$} & $P$(d)\\}
601: \startdata
602: 5 & -1.24 & 0.11 & 14.745 & 13.295 & 3.804 & 1.626 & 1 & 1.15 & 0.515\\
603: 11 & -1.61 & 0.22 & 14.534 & 13.158 & 3.813 & 1.704 & 1 & 0.65 & 0.565\\
604: 15 & -1.68 & 0.18 & 14.397 & 12.765 & 3.784 & 1.781 & 1 & 0.70 & 0.811\\
605: 16 & -1.65 & 0.46 & 14.562 & 13.409 & 3.839 & 1.674 & 0 & 0.49 & 0.330\\
606: 20 & -1.52 & 0.34 & 14.579 & 12.953 & 3.784 & 1.708 & 1 & 1.12 & 0.616\\
607: \enddata
608: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of
609: the Journal. The printed edition contains only a sample.}
610: \end{deluxetable}
611:
612: \end{document}
613: