1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}

3: \def\gr{$\gamma$-ray }

4: \def\grs{$\gamma$-rays }

5: \def\grr{$\gamma$-radiation }

6: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}

7: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}

8: 

9: 

10: \begin{document}

11: \shorttitle{CR propagation parameters from diffuse VHE \gr emission}

12: \title{Obtaining cosmic ray propagation parameters from diffuse VHE \gr emission from the Galactic center ridge}

13: 

14: \author{I. B\"usching}

15: \affil{North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus,  South Africa}

16: \author{O.C. de Jager}

17: \affil{North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus,  South Africa}

18: \author{J. Snyman}

19: \affil{North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus,  South Africa}

20: \keywords{diffuse emission, cosmic ray propagation, Galactic center}

21: \begin{abstract}

22: The recent discovery of diffuse, VHE $\gamma$ radiation from the Galactic

23: center ridge by the H.E.S.S. telescope allow for the first time the direct 

24: determination of  parameters of galactic cosmic ray propagation models.

25: In this paper we show that the diffuse \grr near the Galactic center may be

26: explained by the interaction of VHE cosmic ray (CR) protons with the interstellar

27: gas located in several giant molecular clouds leading to a measurement of

28: the cosmic ray diffusion coefficient for the galactic center region

29: of $\kappa = 1.3$ kpc$^2$Myr$^{-1}$ for a mean proton energy of $\sim 3$ TeV, if 

30: we assume that the CR protons originated from a supernova event (Sgr A East), which took off about 10\,kyr ago. This value of $\kappa$ is $\sim 5$ to 10 times smaller than the locally measured value.

31: 

32: \end{abstract}

33: 

34: \section{Introduction}

35: The High Energy Stereoscopic System of four telescopes offers currently

36: the best angular resolution for the study of VHE $\gamma$-rays from cosmic

37: sources \citep{aharonian06}. With an angular resolution of $\sim 0.08^{\circ}$, the H.E.S.S. Collaboration

38: was able to resolve $\gamma$-rays associated with molecular clouds in the 

39: galactic center region \citep{aharonian06}: Whereas a relatively good

40: correlation was found between the $\gamma$-ray and CS (with the latter measured by \citet{tsuboi99}) surface brightness

41: distributions within 150 pc ($\ell \sim \pm 1^{\circ}$ along galactic longitude) from the galactic center,

42: this correlation degraded at a distance of 200 pc from the galactic center (i.e. at $\ell \sim 1.5^{\circ}$).

43: A strong indicator that this diffuse component is indirectly associated with a source at the

44: galactic center is the similarity of the spectral indices of the point source HESS\,J1745-290

45: at the center and this newly discovered diffuse extended emission. Furthermore, the relatively good correlation

46: within $\ell\sim \pm 1^{\circ}$, but with degrading correlation beyond that,

47: suggests that we are dealing with a source (e.g. the SNR Sgr A East or the central Black Hole

48: Sgr A*) at the GC, which was active for

49: some time in the past and that we are now seeing the  high energetic particles diffusing

50: from this central source \citep{aharonian06}.  

51: The most likely primary species responsible for the gamma-ray emission is then

52: protons, since electrons would have to compete against synchrotron losses,

53: resulting in a spectral steepening towards large distances. Apart from slight effects

54: of energy dependent diffusion, protons, in a good approximation, do not loose energy within this environment, 

55: resulting in an approximate invariant spectral index with distance.

56: 

57: 

58: Whereas these results are important from an Astrophysical viewpoint, it is also

59: of importance from a cosmic ray viewpoint, i.e. the study of cosmic ray propagation

60: in our galaxy: \citet{aharonian06} suggested that the diffusion coefficient 

61: for protons in the 4 to 40 TeV range should be less than $10^{30}$ cm$^2$s$^{-1}$

62: (or 3.5 kpc$^2$Myr$^{-1}$)

63: as a result of enhanced turbulence and higher magnetic field strengths in the GC region.

64: The H.E.S.S. data therefore offer a unique possibility to measure the diffusion

65: coefficient in this part of the galaxy and to compare with other measurements

66: of the galactic diffusion coefficient. 

67: This is in particular important as it has been shown \citep{buesching05} that, given 

68: SNR are the main sources of CR, the widely used method to obtain propagation parameters

69: by fitting secondary to primary data is at least tainted, as the CR primary component then shows strong

70: variations in space and time.

71:  

72: 

73: In this paper we will model a transient source at the GC with an

74: activity time-scale in the past. By solving the transport equation

75: for proton propagation along the galactic plane, we will obtain

76: the range of diffusion coefficients, which fit the observed HESS profile best.

77: To do this we will also model the gas distribution as traced by the CS emission.

78: 

79: \citet{tsuboi99}

80: was the first to obtain a full coverage of the Galactic Center

81: Bow (GCB) and the molecular cloud structures in CS in the region of interest. Since the

82: gamma-ray surface brightness is reflected by the line-of-sight integral of the

83: product of the cosmic ray and gas densities, we will introduce 3D structures

84: in the GC region (even though not strictly modelling the GCB itself), such that

85: the line-of-sight integral through these model structures reproduce the true

86: line-of-sight integrals through the gas density within $\sim 5\%$ accuracy, as described

87: in more detail below.

88:  

89: 

90: 

91: Using the diffusive model of CR propagation, together

92: with observations made by the High Energy Stereoscopic System

93: (H.E.S.S.) \citep{aharonian06} it is possible to get an

94: estimation of the diffusion coefficient controlling cosmic ray (CR)

95: transport in the galactic center region.

96: \subsection{\grs from pion decay}

97: The omnidirectional (i.e. integrated over solid angle) differential

98: \gr source function $q_{\pi^0}(E_{\gamma},\vec{r})$ at the position 

99: $\vec{r}=(l,b,r)$ 

100: for the decay $\pi^0\rightarrow 2\gamma$ is given by \citep{buesching01}

101: \be

102: q_{\pi^0}(E_{\gamma},\vec{r})&=& 2\int_{\eta}^{\infty} 

103: \frac{Q_{\pi^0}(\gamma_{\pi},\vec{r})}{\sqrt{\gamma^2_{\pi}-1}}d\gamma_{\pi}

104: \label{grs:srcfkt}

105: \ee

106: where $\gamma_{\pi}$ is the pion Lorentz factor.

107: The lower boundary of the integration is given by

108: \be

109: \eta&=&\frac{E_{\gamma}}{m_{\pi}c^2}+\frac{m_{\pi}c^2}{4\,E_{\gamma}}.

110: \ee

111: The pion source function then is 

112: \be

113: Q_{\pi^0}(\gamma_{\pi},\vec{r})&=&\rho_{\rm gas}(\vec{r})\,c 

114: \int_{\gamma_{\rm thr}}^{\infty} \beta\sigma^{\pi^0}_{pp}(\gamma_p,\gamma_{\pi^0})N_p(\gamma_p,\vec{r})d\gamma_p

115: \label{grs:losi}

116: \ee

117: where $\sigma^{\pi^0}_{pp}$ is the total cross section for pion production in $pp$ collisions and $N_p$ the CR proton spectrum.

118: The differential photon flux from the decay of CR induced $\pi^0$s from the 

119: direction $(l,b)$ is given by integrating Eq.\ref{grs:srcfkt} along the line of sight 

120: \be

121: \frac{dN(E_{\gamma},l,b)}{dt\,dE_{\gamma}\,d\Omega} &=&

122: \frac{1}{4\pi}\int q_{\pi^0}(E_{\gamma},\vec{r}) dr

123: \ee

124: The above calculation is for pion production from $pp$ interactions only.

125: The effect of the known chemical composition of the ISM can be taken into account by 

126: increasing the total pion production cross section by a factor of 1.30 

127: \citep{ms94}. 

128: \section{Reproducing the diffusive \gr emission from the Galactic center}

129: For our studies we reproduce the diffusive \gr emission calculating the line of sight integral

130: Eq.~\ref{grs:losi} for various $(l,b)$ combinations. As we are only interested in relative 

131: intensities, we can use instead of   Eq.~\ref{grs:losi} the relative emissivity

132: \be

133: \epsilon(l,b)&\propto&\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\rho(l,b,r)N_{CR}(l,b,r)\,dr

134: \label{calc:emissivity}

135: \ee

136: where $\rho(l,b,r)$ is the target material density as a function of

137: galactic coordinates and $N_{CR}(l,b,r)$ is the calculated CR

138: density at the point defined by triplet $(l,b,r)$.

139: 

140: \subsection{Gas distribution near the Galactic center}

141: The inner $\pm 150$\,pc region of the Galaxy contain interstellar $H_2$ gas

142: of about 2 to 5$\times10^7$ solar masses 

143: \citep{tsuboi99} 

144: in a rather complex setup of molecular clouds.

145: For our analysis we assumed that the target material density function can be

146: adequately described by the superposition of five spherical Gaussian

147: functions upon an asymmetric Gaussian base. These functions represent the 

148: molecular clouds associated with the radio arc of Sgr A, Sgr B, as well as the

149: longitude varying line-of-sight projection effect of the "Galactic Center Bow" as described

150: by \citet{tsuboi99}. Even though we are able to reproduce the observed line-of-sight

151: gas densities within about 5\% from the observed values, uncertainties in the exact depth 

152: distribution along the r-coordinate in Eq. \ref{calc:emissivity}, is expected

153: to result in a $\sim 50$\% systematic uncertainty in the final estimate of the diffusion coefficient.  

154:   

155: \subsection{Cosmic ray distribution near the Galactic center}

156: The CR distribution as a

157: function of spatial coordinates is calculated using 

158: the diffusive model of CR propagation.

159: We calculate the CR density assuming the CR 

160: coming from a single SNR event 10\,kyr ago, accelerating particles for a certain time. 

161: As was pointed out by \citet{maeda02}, the SNR Sgr A East has an estimated 

162: age of 10\,kyr, but also younger ages have been given for that SNR \citep{rockefeller05}.

163: For our study, we assume that Sgr A East has an age of 10\,kyr and was  

164: accelerating CR on various timescales less than 10\,kyr. 

165: We are  interested in the CR distribution near the source and thus neglect 

166: the effects of spatial inhomogeneities in the interstellar gas density (which are small for CR protons with the 

167:  energies we are dealing with) by assuming a mean gas density,

168: and also  boundary effects by imposing boundary conditions for the CR propagation problem at infinity. 

169: In this case one can find a solution for the propagation equation in the 

170: literature \citep{syrovatskii59}.

171: Using the integral in Eq.~\ref{calc:emissivity} the emission seen by H.E.S.S.

172: \citep{aharonian06} can be recreated for different diffusion

173: coefficients as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:res} (top). As noted  by

174: \citet{aharonian06}, the excess counts observed by H.E.S.S.

175: follow the known target material density fairly well, except for the

176: region $l\ge1^\circ$. This provides a gauge for approximating the

177: diffusion coefficient governing the CR propagation near the galactic

178: center.

179: 

180: To obtain better counting statistics, we compare the model and observed

181: H.E.S.S. excess counts, integrated over Galactic latitude. 

182: The excess counts observed by H.E.S.S. then are

183: proportional to the integral

184: \be

185: \epsilon(l)&\propto&\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{b=-\pi2}^{\pi/2}\rho(l,b,r)N_{CR}(l,b,r)r\,db\,dr,

186: \label{calc:int}

187: \ee

188: where the CR density $N_{CR}$ has been 

189: calculated for different diffusion coefficients, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:res}

190: (bottom). 

191: The obtained fit is normalised to the total numbers 

192: of excess counts before calculating the corresponding  $\chi^2$ value. 

193: The results of the analysis are shown

194: in Fig.~\ref{fig:chisq} below.  The optimal value for the diffusion

195: coefficient $k$ was found to be

196: \begin{equation}

197: \kappa=1.3\,{\rm kpc}^2{\rm Myr}^{-1},

198: \label{calc:kfinal}

199: \end{equation}

200: which is about 40\% smaller than the diffusion coefficient estimated by

201: \citet{aharonian06}. We also note that the minimum reduced $\chi^2$ is 1.5

202: (for $\sim 25$ d.o.f.), which indicates that the data are marginally

203: described by the model. Note that we do observe

204: a well-defined minimum in Fig.~\ref{fig:chisq}, leading to the abovementioned

205: measurement of $\kappa$. It would be interesting to see if more sophisticated

206: 3D modelling of the total gas distribution result in even smaller $\chi^2$ values. Because of this uncertainty, we estimate a systematic uncertainty of $\sim 50\%$ on the measured value of $\kappa$.

207: 

208: \begin{figure*}

209: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f1.ps}} 

210: \caption{

211: Calculated emission sky maps (top) together with the calculated excess

212: counts (bottom) shown as the solid lines.  The histogram indicate

213: the excess counts from the H.E.S.S. observation \citep{aharonian06}. 

214: The figures (a), (b) and (c) where generated for diffusion

215: coefficients with values $0.3\ kpc^2Myr^{-1}$, $1.3\ kpc^2Myr^{-1}$ (best fit)

216: and $15.1\ kpc^2Myr^{-1}$ respectively.}

217: \label{fig:res}

218: \end{figure*}

219: 

220: \begin{figure}

221: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f2.ps}} 

222: \caption{

223: Reduced $\chi^2$ values plotted for different diffusion coefficients. We find a

224: well defined minimum for a diffusion coefficient of $k=1.3\ kpc^2Myr^{-1}$. 

225: }

226: \label{fig:chisq}

227: \end{figure}

228: \subsection{Mean CR energy}

229: In the last section, we have shown that the diffuse \gr emission from the 

230: Galcatic center ridge can be explained by CR hadrons which propagation can be described by a diffusion coefficient of 

231: $1.3$\,kpc$^2$Myr$^{-1}$.

232: This diffusion coefficient is valid for CR generating the bulk of

233: the \gr emission in the H.E.S.S. energy range. 

234: 

235: To compare this value 

236: with that obtained by fitting local CR data, as derived e.g. by \citet{moskalenko02},  \citet{jones01} or \citet{maurin02}, we have to  estimate the energy of the CR probed here.

237: For this investigation, we  approximate the sensitivity of the H.E.S.S. telescope array by a box function from 0.4\,TeV to 20\,TeV. For the CR proton spectrum 

238: we assumed a power law with the observed  photon index  $\Gamma\,=\,2.29\pm 0.27$ \citep{aharonian06}.

239: We used the Pythia \citep{pythia1,pythia2} event generator package to calculate the number 

240: of \grs with $E_{\gamma}>0.4$\,TeV, for different CR proton energies.

241: The result of this calculation is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:gl400}.

242: \begin{figure}

243: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f3.ps}} 

244: \caption{

245: Number of photons with $E_{\gamma}>400\,GeV$ for different CR proton energies

246: assuming a CR proton spectral index of $s\,=\,2.29$.}

247: \label{fig:gl400}

248: \end{figure}

249: The maximum number of photons is produced by CR protons with energies of about 2.2\,TeV, given a proton spectral index of 2.29. Note that the location of the maximum  

250: depends on the proton spectral index. Given the uncertainties stated by  \citet{aharonian06}, 

251: we find that CR protons with energies in the range 1.7\,TeV to 3\,TeV contribute 

252: mostly to the \grs seen by H.E.S.S.

253: Assuming a diffusion coefficient of the form 

254: \be

255: \kappa&=&\kappa_0\left(\frac{\xi}{\xi_0}\right)^{0.6},

256: \ee

257: where $\xi_0=1\,$GV and $\xi$ the particle rigidity

258: we find $\kappa_0=0.013$\,kpc$^2$Myr$^{-2}$,

259: which is significantly smaller than the values found  

260: by fitting local CR data. However, $\kappa$ for the latter range from 0.0535\,kpc$^2$Myr$^{-2}$ to 0.201\,kpc$^2$Myr$^{-2}$, as compiled by \citet{maurin02} (with references therein).

261: This finding can be well explained by enhanced turbulence and a higher field strength of the interstellar magnetic field in the  

262: Galactic center region. We note however that the rigidity dependence of 0.6 can only apply to a limited

263: energy (rigidity) range, since $\kappa$ must always be larger than the Bohm limit.

264: 

265: 

266: \section{Summary and Discussion}

267: We have shown that the progress in the imaging Cherenkov technique now makes it 

268: possible for the first time to measure the CR diffusion coefficient  

269: in other parts of the Galaxy. A diffusion coefficient of $\kappa\sim 1.3$ kpc$^2$Myr$^{-1}$

270: appears to be well measured from the data, although we have to add a $\sim 50\%$ systematic

271: undertainty arising from uncertainties in the actual 3D gas density distribution, as well

272: as uncertainties on the epoch when the central source activity started, which was assumed to be 10 kyr

273: in this paper. The most likely central source is Sgr A East, for which the epoch of onset of

274: activity is $\sim 10$ kyr, but if the central source was the central massive black hole Sgr A*,

275: the timescale of activity would be much less certain, resulting in even larger uncertainties

276: on $\kappa$. Note however that, given an initial epoch of onset of activity (i.e. 10 kyr),

277: estimates of $\kappa$ appear to be fortunately robust

278: against uncertainties in the detailed time profile of particle acceleration within 5 kyr after the SN explosion. For example, 

279: reducing the ``on''-time of the source by a factor of five, decreases the diffusion coefficient by 40\%. Such detailed studies will however be treated in a subsequent paper. 

280: Thus, if Sgr A East was the source of CR, then we have a relatively

281: accurate masurement of $\kappa$. 

282: 

283: In general, following the notion of \citet{aharonian06} to constrain the cosmic ray diffusion

284: coefficient $\kappa$ from the spatial distribution of diffuse $\gamma$-rays resulting

285: from impulsive injection of a CR source at some time in the past, we have

286: shown that one can obtain unique measurements of the diffusion coefficient,

287: provided that the gas density distribution, as well as the epoch of onset of

288: central source activity is known. 

289: We also showed that the CR diffusion coefficient in the Galactic center region is 

290: significantly smaller than that obtained by fitting local CR data. Our understanding

291: of turbulence theory is however still too limited to understand how diffusion coefficients

292: scale with the turbulence $\delta B$, the correlation length associated with this

293: turbulence, the total magnetic field strength $B$ and rigidity

294: dependence for perpendicular and parallel diffusion. Hopefully our new

295: measurement of $\kappa$ will help to constrain results from turbulence theory.

296: 

297: 

298: \begin{thebibliography}{}

299: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006)]{aharonian06} Aharonian et al. 2006, Nature, 439,695 

300: \bibitem[B\"usching et al.(2005)]{buesching05}  B\"usching I., et al., 2005,  \apj, 619, 314

301: \bibitem[B\"usching et al.(2001)]{buesching01}  B\"usching I., Pohl M., Schlickeiser R. 2001,  \aap, 377, 1056

302: \bibitem[Jones et al.(2001)]{jones01} Jones, F. C., Lukasiak, A., Ptuskin, V., \& Webber, W. 2001, \apj, 547, 2644

303: \bibitem[Maeda et al.(2002)]{maeda02} Maeda, Y., et al. 2002, \apj, 570, 671

304: \bibitem[Mannheim \&  Schlickeiser(1994)]{ms94} Mannheim, K., \&  Schlickeiser, R. 1994, \aap, 286, 983

305: \bibitem[Maurin et al.(2002)]{maurin02} Maurin, D., Taillet, R., \& Donato, F. 2002, \aap, 394, 1039 

306: \bibitem[Moskalenko et al.(2002)]{moskalenko02} Moskalenko, I. V., Strong, A. W., Ormes, J. F., \& Potgieter, M. S. 2002, \apj, 565, 280

307: \bibitem[Rockefeller(2005)]{rockefeller05} Rockefeller, G., et al., 2005, submitted to \apj (astro-ph/0506244)

308: \bibitem[Sj\"ostrand et al.(2001a)]{pythia1} Sjo¨strand, T., Lonnblad, L., \& Mrenna, S. 2001a, Pythia 6.2: Physics and Manual (hep-ph/0108264)

309: \bibitem[Sj\"ostrand et al.(2001b)]{pythia2} Sj\"ostrand, T.,et al., 2001b,

310: Computer Physics Commun. 135, 238,

311: \bibitem[Syrovatskii(1959)]{syrovatskii59} Syrovatskii, S.I., 1959, Sov. Astron., 3, 22 

312: \bibitem[Tsuboi et al.(1999)]{tsuboi99}  Tsuboi, K., Toshihiro, H., \& Ukita, N. 1999, \apjs, 120, 1 

313: \end{thebibliography}

314: 

315: 

316: 

317: \end{document}

318: