1: \documentclass[
2: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
3: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
4: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
5: %% , % add further options here if necessary
6: ]
7: {aipproc}
8:
9: \layoutstyle{6x9}
10: \usepackage{epsfig}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Milagro Search for Very High Energy Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts in the \em{Swift} Era}
15: \author{P.~M.~Saz Parkinson for the Milagro Collaboration\footnote{
16: A.~Abdo,
17: B.~T.~Allen,
18: R.~Atkins,
19: D.~Berley,
20: E.~Blaufuss,
21: S.~Casanova,
22: D.~G.~Coyne,
23: B.~L.~Dingus,
24: R.~W.~Ellsworth,
25: L.~Fleysher,
26: R.~Fleysher,
27: M.~M.~Gonzalez,
28: J.~A.~Goodman,
29: E.~Hays,
30: C.~M.~Hoffman,
31: L.~A.~Kelley,
32: C.~P.~Lansdell,
33: J.~T.~Linnemann,
34: J.~E.~McEnery,
35: A.~I.~Mincer,
36: M.~F.~Morales,
37: P.~Nemethy,
38: D.~Noyes,
39: J.~M.~Ryan,
40: F.~W.~Samuelson,
41: P.~M.~Saz~Parkinson,
42: A.~Shoup,
43: G.~Sinnis,
44: A.~J.~Smith,
45: G.~W.~Sullivan,
46: V.~Vasileiou,
47: G.~P.~Walker,
48: D.~A.~Williams,
49: X.~W.~Xu
50: and
51: G.~B.~Yodh}}{
52: address={Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California,
53: 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
54: }
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57:
58: The recently launched {\em Swift} satellite is providing an unprecedented number of rapid
59: and accurate Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) localizations, facilitating a flurry of follow-up
60: observations by a large number of telescopes at many different wavelengths. The Very
61: High Energy (VHE, $>$100 GeV) regime has so far been relatively unexplored.
62: Milagro is a wide field of view (2 sr) and high duty cycle ($>$ 90\%) ground-based
63: gamma-ray telescope which employs a water Cherenkov detector to monitor the northern
64: sky almost continuously in the 100 GeV to 100 TeV energy range. We have searched the
65: Milagro data for emission from the most recent GRBs identified within our field of view.
66: These include three {\em Swift} bursts which also display late-time X-ray flares. We have searched
67: for emission coincident with these flares. No significant detection was made. A 99\%
68: confidence upper limit is provided for each of the GRBs, as well as the flares.
69:
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \maketitle
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: Some of the most important contributions to our understanding of gamma-ray bursts have come
77: from observations of afterglows over a wide spectral range~\citep{2000ARA&A..38..379V}. Very
78: little, however, is known about the broadband spectra of GRBs in the prompt phase, due
79: to its short duration. Many GRB production models predict a fluence at TeV comparable to
80: that at MeV scales~\citep{dermer00,pilla98,zhang01}. Almost all GRBs are detected in the energy
81: range between 20 keV and 1 MeV, though several have been observed above 100 MeV by EGRET,
82: indicating that the spectrum of GRBs extends at least out to 1 GeV~\citep{dingus01}. A second
83: component was also found in one burst which extended up to at least 200 MeV and
84: had a much slower temporal decay than the main burst~\citep{gonzalez03}. It is unclear how high
85: in energy this component extends to and whether it is similar to the inverse Compton peak seen
86: in many TeV sources. At very high energies there has been no conclusive emission detected for
87: any single
88: GRB, though a search for counterparts to 54 BATSE bursts with Milagrito, a prototype of Milagro,
89: found evidence for emission from one burst, with a significance slightly greater than
90: 3$\sigma$~\citep{atkins00a}. At these high energies, gamma rays suffer from attenuation due to the
91: extra-galactic background light (EBL), which is
92: redshift-dependent~\citep{stecker98,primack99,primack05}, making GRBs above z$>$0.5
93: very difficult to observe. Here, we describe our search for VHE emission from 20 GRBs which
94: have occurred within the field of view of Milagro\footnote{We have included GRB 051103 in our sample,
95: despite being at a relatively large zenith angle, given its potential interest and possible
96: proximity.} between December 2004 and December 2005. Recently, {\em Swift} has also observed bright
97: X-ray flares from GRB afterglows, sometimes of comparable energy
98: to the burst itself~\citep{burrows05,falcone05}. Although the most significant of these flares (from GRB 050502B)
99: was unfortunately outside the field of view of Milagro, six other flares from three different
100: GRBs were observable~\citep{falcone05b}. We present the upper limits derived from our observations.
101:
102: \section{Data Analysis and Results}
103:
104: A search for an excess of events above those due to the background was made for each of the 20 bursts
105: in our sample, listed in Table~\ref{grb_table}, as well as for the flares listed in Table~\ref{grb_table2}. The number of events falling within a 1.6 degree bin
106: was summed for the relevant duration (column 2 of Table~\ref{grb_table} or column 4 of Table~\ref{grb_table2}). An estimate of the
107: number of background events was made by characterizing the angular distribution of the background
108: using two hours of data surrounding the burst, using a technique known as ``direct integration''
109: ~\citep{atkins03b}. For those bursts whose redshift is known, we compute the effect of the
110: absorption, according to the model of \cite{primack05} and print the upper limits in bold.
111: No significant emission was detected. Our upper limits are given in column seven of Table~\ref{grb_table} (for the GRBs) and Table~\ref{grb_table2} (for the flares).
112:
113: Some of the more interesting bursts in Table~\ref{grb_table}
114: include GRB 050509b, the second \emph{short/hard} burst detected by \emph{Swift}, with a reported
115: duration of 30 ms and a relatively low fluence of 2.3$\times10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ in the 15--350
116: keV range~\cite{barthelmy}. Although Milagro detected no emission from this burst~\cite{saz}, the very
117: favorable zenith angle ($10^\circ$) and possible low redshift of 0.226 provide the opportunity
118: to set interesting upper limits for TeV emission from this burst. Another burst that deserves mention
119: is GRB 051103, a short burst detected by the IPN, possibly originating from the
120: nearby ($<$ 4 Mpc) galaxy M81~\citep{051103}. Although this burst was not at a favorable zenith
121: angle for Milagro ($\theta >$45$^\circ$), we chose to analyse the data, due
122: to its potential interest. If this burst were associated with M81, as has been suggested, the
123: almost complete absence of absorption would make the Milagro upper limit on the fluence
124: about 20\% of the measured fluence in the X-ray band~\citep{saz2}. Finally, GRB 051109 occurred
125: at a zenith angle of less than 10$^\circ$ for Milagro, making it the burst with the best
126: location of our sample. Unfortunately, this burst had a measured redshift of 2.346, making the
127: Milagro limit, once absorption is taken into account, several orders of magnitude larger than
128: the measured fluence in the X-ray band~\citep{saz3}.
129:
130: In Table~\ref{grb_table2} we list 6 flares detected by {\em Swift} from
131: 3 GRBs which were in Milagro's field of view~\citep{falcone05}. Milagro detected no significant
132: emission from any of these flares. The brightest of these flares, from GRB 050607, had a fluence in
133: the X-ray range of roughly 1.5$\times 10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$~\citep{king05}, placing the Milagro
134: limit about an order of magnitude higher.
135:
136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
137: %% GRB TABLE
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139:
140: \begin{table}
141: \begin{tabular}{llllllll}
142: \hline
143: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{GRB} &
144: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{T90/Dur.\tablenote{Duration of burst.}} &
145: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{$\theta$\tablenote{Zenith angle (degrees).}} &
146: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{$z$\tablenote{redshift (when known).}} &
147: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{Instrument\tablenote{Instrument reporting the first detection.}} &
148: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{$\sigma$\tablenote{Significance of the signal.}} &
149: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{UL(fluence)\tablenote{99\% upper limit on the fluence (0.2--20 TeV), in ergs cm$^{-2}$. The numbers in bold take into account absorption by the EBL (using the Primack 05 model). Those with three dots are at redshifts so high that all the emission is expected to be absorbed.}} \\
150: \hline
151: 041219a & 520 & 26.9 & ... & INTEGRAL & +1.7 & 5.8e-6 \\
152: 050124 & 4 & 23.0 & ... & Swift & -0.8 & 3.0e-7 \\
153: 050319 & 15 & 45.1 & 3.24 & Swift & +0.6 & ... \\
154: 050402 & 8 & 40.4 & ... & Swift & +0.6 & 2.1e-6 \\
155: 050412 & 26 & 37.2 & ... & Swift & -0.6 & 1.7e-6 \\
156: 050502 & 20 & 42.7 & 3.793 & INTEGRAL & +0.6 & ... \\
157: 050504 & 80 & 27.6 & ... & INTEGRAL & -0.8 & 1.3e-6 \\
158: 050505 & 60 & 28.9 & 4.3 & Swift & +1.2 & ... \\
159: 050509b & 0.128 & 10.0 & 0.226?& Swift & -0.9 & \textbf{1.1e-6} \\
160: 050522 & 15 & 22.9 & ... & INTEGRAL & -0.6 & 5.1e-7 \\
161: 050607 & 26.5 & 29.3 & ... & Swift & -0.9 & 8.9e-7 \\
162: 050712 & 35 & 38.8 & ... & Swift & -0.1 & 2.5e-6 \\
163: 050713b & 30 & 44.2 & ... & Swift & -0.3 & 4.0e-6 \\
164: 050715 & 52 & 36.9 & ... & Swift & -1.5 & 1.7e-6 \\
165: 050716 & 69 & 30.3 & ... & Swift & -0.5 & 1.6e-6 \\
166: 050820 & 20 & 21.9 & 2.612 & Swift & +0.2 & ... \\
167: 051103 & 0.17 & 49.9\tablenote{This burst was analyzed despite its large zenith angle due to its
168: potential interest as a nearby short burst.} & 0.001?& IPN & -0.2 & \textbf{4.2e-6} \\
169: 051109 & 36 & 9.7 & 2.346 & Swift & -1.1 & \textbf{4.3e-3} \\
170: 051111 & 20 & 43.7 & 1.55 & Swift & +0.7 & \textbf{3.8e-2} \\
171: 051211b & 80 & 33.3 & ... & INTEGRAL & +0.4 & 2.6e-6 \\
172:
173: \hline
174: \end{tabular}
175: \caption{List of GRB in the field of view of Milagro in the Swift Era (December 2004 -- December 2005), with preliminary upper limits.\label{grb_table}}
176: \end{table}
177:
178:
179: \begin{table}
180: \begin{tabular}{lllllll}
181: \hline
182: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{GRB} &
183: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{Burst Time\tablenote{BAT trigger time (UTC second of day).}} &
184: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{Flare Time\tablenote{Time of onset of flare (seconds after BAT trigger time).}} &
185: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{Dur.\tablenote{Approximate duration of flare (s).}} &
186: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{$\theta$\tablenote{Zenith angle (degrees).}} &
187: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{$\sigma$\tablenote{Significance of the signal.}} &
188: \tablehead{1}{l}{b}{UL(fluence)\tablenote{99\% upper limit on the fluence (0.2--20 TeV), in ergs cm$^{-2}$. No absorption is taken into account as the redshift of these bursts is unknown.}} \\
189: \hline
190: 050607 & 33,083 & 110 & 120 & 29.1 & -1.3 & 1.5e-6 \\
191: 050607 & 33,083 & 260 & 340 & 28.9 & -1.3 & 2.4e-6 \\
192: 050712 & 50,427.5 & 170 & 265 & 38.5 & +1.8 & 9.7e-6 \\
193: 050712 & 50,427.5 & 435 & 255 & 38.1 & +2.3 & 1.0e-5 \\
194: 050716 & 45,364 & 135 & 65 & 30.7 & -1.1 & 1.3e-6 \\
195: 050716 & 45,364 & 330 & 120 & 31.4 & -0.4 & 2.3e-6 \\
196:
197: \hline
198: \end{tabular}
199: \caption{Bright X-ray Flares in Swift GRB Afterglows\label{grb_table2}}
200: \end{table}
201:
202:
203: \section{Conclusion}
204:
205: A search for VHE emission from GRBs was performed with the Milagro observatory in the range of 100 GeV
206: to 100 TeV. A total of 20 satellite-triggered GRBs were well localized and fell within Milagro's field
207: of view in the year since the launch of Swift. In addition, six bright X-ray flares from GRB afterglows
208: were searched for VHE emission. No significant emission was detected from either the bursts or the
209: flares. 99\% confidence upper limits on the fluence are presented.
210:
211: \begin{theacknowledgments}
212: Many people helped bring Milagro to fruition. In particular, we
213: acknowledge the efforts of Scott DeLay, Neil Thompson and Michael Schneider.
214: This work has been supported by the
215: National Science Foundation (under grants
216: PHY-0075326, %Milagro Operations
217: -0096256, %UW-Madison
218: -0097315, %LANL via UMD
219: -0206656, %NYU current; previous is PHY-9901496
220: -0245143, %UCSC; previous is PHY-0070927
221: -0245234, %UCI; previous is PHY-0070933
222: -0302000, %UMD
223: and
224: ATM-0002744) %UNH
225: the US Department of Energy (Office of High-Energy Physics and
226: Office of Nuclear Physics), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the University of
227: California, and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics.
228: \end{theacknowledgments}
229:
230:
231: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
232: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
233: %% setup or preferences.
234: %%
235: %% If the bibliography is produced without BibTeX comment out the
236: %% following lines and see the aipguide.pdf for further information.
237: %%
238: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240:
241: \begin{thebibliography}{1}
242: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
243: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
244:
245:
246: \bibitem[van Paradijs et al. (2000)]{2000ARA&A..38..379V} van Paradijs, J., Kouveliotou, C.
247: \& Wijers, R.~A.~M.~J. 2000, \emph{Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics} 38, 379
248: \bibitem [Dermer, Chiang \& Mitman (2000)]{dermer00}
249: Dermer, C.\ D., Chiang, J., \& Mitman, K.\ E.\ 2000, \emph{ApJ} 537, 785
250: \bibitem[Pilla \& Loeb (1998)]{pilla98} Pilla, R. P. \& Loeb, A. 1998, \emph{ApJL} 494, L167
251: \bibitem[Zhang \& M\'esz\'aros (2001)]{zhang01} Zhang, B.\ \& M\'esz\'aros, P.\ 2001, \emph{ApJ} 559, 110
252: \bibitem[Dingus (2001)]{dingus01}
253: Dingus, B. L. 2001, in Aharonian, F. A. and Volk, H. J. (eds), \emph{High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy}, AIP Conference Proceedings, 558, 383
254: \bibitem[Gonzalez et al.(2003)]{gonzalez03} Gonzalez, M.~M.\ et al. 2003, \emph{Nature} 424, 749
255: \bibitem[Atkins et al.(2000a)]{atkins00a} Atkins, R. et al. 2000, \emph{ApJL} 533, L119
256:
257: \bibitem[Stecker \& de Jager (1998)]{stecker98} Stecker, F. \& de Jager, O. C. 1998, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics} 334, L85
258: \bibitem[Primack, Bullock, Somerville \& Macminn (1999)]{primack99}
259: Primack, J. R., Bullock, J. S., Somerville, R. S. \& Macminn, D. 1999, \emph{Astroparticle Physics}, 11, 93
260: \bibitem[Primack et al.(2005)]{primack05} Primack, J. R. et al. 2005, in Aharonian, F. A., Volk, H. J., and Horns, D. (eds) \emph{Gamma 2004 Heidelberg}, AIP Conference Proceedings, 745, 23-33
261: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2005)]{burrows05} Burrows, D. N. et al. 2005, \emph{Science}, 309, 1833
262: \bibitem[Falcone et al. (2005)]{falcone05} Falcone, A. et al. 2005, \emph{ApJ}, submitted
263: \bibitem[Falcone et al. (2005)]{falcone05b} Falcone, A. \emph{personal communication (2005)}
264: \bibitem[Atkins et al.(2003b)]{atkins03b} Atkins, R. et al. 2003, \emph{ApJ} 595, 803
265: \bibitem{barthelmy} Barthelmy, S. et al. 2005, GCN Circular No. 3385
266: \bibitem{saz} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.~ 2005, GCN Circular No. 3411
267: \bibitem{051103} Golenetskii, S. et al. 2005, GCN Circular No. 4197
268: \bibitem{saz2} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.~ 2005, GCN Circular No. 4249
269: \bibitem{saz3} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.~ 2005, GCN Circular No. 4265
270: \bibitem[King et al. (2005)]{king05} King, A. et al. 2005, \emph{ApJL}, L113-L115
271:
272: \end{thebibliography}
273: \end{document}
274:
275: \endinput
276:
277: