1: \documentstyle{pasj00}

2: %\draft

3: \begin{document}

4: 

5: \SetRunningHead{A.Imada et al.}{SU UMa star 2QZ J021927.9-304545}

6: 

7: \title{The 2005 July Superoutburst of the Dwarf Nova 2QZ J021927.9-304545:

8: the SU UMa nature confirmed}

9: 

10: \author{Akira \textsc{Imada}, Taichi \textsc{Kato}}

11: 

12: \affil{$^1$Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Science, Kyoto University,

13:        Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502}

14: \email{a\_imada@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}

15: 

16: \author{L.A.G. \textsc{Monard}}

17: 

18: \affil{Bronberg Observatory, CBA Pretoria, PO Box 11426, Tiegerpoort

19:        0056, South Africa}

20: 

21: \author{Alon \textsc{Retter}}

22: 

23: \affil{Department of Astronomy $\&$ Astrophysics, Penn State 

24:        University, \\ 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802-6305, USA}

25: 

26: \author{Alex \textsc{Liu}}

27: 

28: \affil{Norcape Observatory, PO Box 300, Exmouth WA 6707, Australia}

29: 

30: \author{Daisaku \textsc{Nogami}}

31: 

32: \affil{Hida Observatory, Kyoto University, Kamitakara, Gifu 506-1314}

33: 

34: \KeyWords{

35:           accretion, accretion disks

36:           --- stars: dwarf novae

37:           --- stars: individual (2QZ J021927.9-304545)

38:           --- stars: novae, cataclysmic variables

39:           --- stars: oscillations

40: }

41: 

42: \maketitle

43: 

44: \begin{abstract}

45: We report on time-resolved photometry of the 2005 July superoutburst of

46:  the dwarf nova, 2QZ J021927.9-304545. The resultant light curves showed

47:  conspicuous superhumps with a period of 0.081113(19) days, confirming

48:  the SU UMa nature of the object. Although we missed the maximum

49:  phase of the outburst, the amplitude of the superoutburst well exceeded

50:  5 mag. This value is slightly larger than that of typical SU UMa-type

51:  dwarf novae. The superhump period decreased as time elapsed, as can be

52:  seen in most SU UMa-type dwarf novae. Based on the archive of ASAS-3,

53:  the recurrence time of a superoutburst of the variable turned out to be

54:  about 400 days. This value is typical of well known SU UMa stars. The

55:  distance to this system was roughly estimated as 370(+20, -60) pc using

56:  an empirical relation.

57: \end{abstract}

58: 

59: \section{Introduction}

60: 

61: Cataclysmic variables are close binany systems that consist of a white

62: dwarf primary and a late-type secondary star. The secondary star fills

63: its Roche-lobe, leading to mass transfer via the inner Lagragian point

64: ($L_{1}$), forming an accretion disk around the white dwarf (for a review,

65: see e.g., \cite{war95book}; \cite{hel01book}). Dwarf novae are a

66: subclass of cataclysmic variables, further subdivided into three types:

67: U Gem stars, Z Cam stars, and SU UMa stars, based on their

68: outburst properties (for a review, \cite{osa96review};

69: \cite{kat04vsnet}). SU UMa-type dwarf novae, which have orbital periods

70: below 2 hours in most cases, exhibit two types of outburst: normal

71: outbursts whose duration is a few days and superoutbursts which continue

72: for about 2 weeks. Superoutbursts are always accompanied by ${\sim}$ 0.2

73: mag modulations called superhump. It is believed that a tidally deformed

74: eccentric accretion disk gives rise to phase-dependent tidal

75: dissipation, which is observed as superhumps (\cite{whi88tidal};

76: \cite{osa89suuma}). Optical photometry for SU UMa-type dwarf novae

77: during superoutbursts is one of the best ways to decipher the dynamics

78: of the accretion disk.

79: 

80: 2QZ J021927.9-304545 is catalogued in 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ)

81: \citep{boy002qz1}. A

82: possible 2MASS counterpart has $J$ = 16.391(0.118), $H$ =

83: 15.671(0.142), and $K$ = 15.359(0.202), respectively (for 2MASS

84: compilation of dwarf novae, see \cite{hoa02CV2MASS};

85: \cite{ima05j0137}). The object is identified with USNO B1.0 0592-0024305

86: ($B$1 = 18.72, $R$1 = 18.49, $R$2 = 17.62, $I$2 = 18.02). Long-term

87: photometric monitoring of this

88: object was performed by the All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS,

89: \cite{poj02asas3}). ASAS-3 monitoring over the past few

90: years has provided some evidence that the star is a possible candidate

91: for an SU UMa-type dwarf nova. To test the SU UMa nature of

92: the system, we have continuously monitored the object at CBA Pretoria

93: since 2005 January. As a consequence, we detected an outburst on 2005

94: July 2 reaching a magnitude of about 11.9 in $R_{\rm c}$. However, bad

95: weather prevented us from time-resolved observations during the first

96: day of discovery. As for the ASAS-3 survey, the variable was invisible

97: on 2005 June 22 with the magnitude below the detection limit of the

98: ASAS-3, the object got brightened up to V ${\sim}$ 12.5 mag on 2005 July

99: 3. After that we performed time-resolved CCD observations. Conspicuous

100: feature of superhumps was detected, so that we confirmed the SU UMa

101: nature of the object. Quiescent photometry of the object was carried out

102: at CBA Pretoria, yielding 18.2 in $R_{\rm c}$ (see e.g., [vsnet-alert

103: 8521])\footnote{http://ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/pipermail/vsnet-alert/2005-July/000140.html}.

104: 

105: In the paper, we report on photometric results during the 2005 July

106: superoutburst of 2QZ J021927.9-304545, as well as long-term observations

107: of the object (hereafter aliased 2QZ 0219).

108: 

109: \section{Observations}

110: 

111: Time-resolved CCD observations were carried out at two sites of the

112: VSNET Collaboration team (see \cite{kat04vsnet}). A journal of

113: observations is summarized in table 1. Although we did not use any

114: filters, the obtained data were close to those of $R_{\rm

115: c}$$-$system. The exposure times were 15 and 30 sec, with a read-out

116: time of a few seconds. All frames were processed using AIP4WIN, and

117: magnitudes were derived by aperture photometry. As the comparison star, we

118: used GSC7007.1900, whose constancy was checked against several field

119: stars. The precision of individual data points was estimated to be

120: better than 0.03 mag. The calibrated magnitude for each site was

121: adjusted to ASAS-3 data of the object. 

122: 

123: Heliocentric correction was made for each data set before the following

124: analysis.

125: 

126: \begin{table}

127: \caption{Log of Observations.}

128: \begin{center}

129: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

130: \hline\hline

131: HJD(start)$^*$ & HJD(end) & N$^\dagger$ & Exp(s)$^\ddagger$ &

132:  Observer$^\S$ \\

133: \hline

134:  3555.5776 & 3555.6681 & 498 & 15 & BM \\

135:  3556.5206 & 3556.6717 & 796 & 15 & BM \\

136:  3557.5063 & 3557.6535 & 808 & 15 & BM \\

137:  3558.5113 & 3558.6767 & 910 & 15 & BM \\

138:  3559.5070 & 3559.6761 & 932 & 15 & BM \\

139:  3561.5359 & 3561.6708 & 381 & 30 & BM \\

140:  3562.5185 & 3562.6683 & 380 & 30 & BM \\

141:  3563.4719 & 3563.6730 & 570 & 30 & BM \\

142:  3564.5204 & 3564.6707 & 426 & 30 & BM \\

143:  3565.3170 & 3565.4093 &  64 & 30 & AL \\

144:  3565.4987 & 3565.6409 & 394 & 30 & BM \\

145:  3566.5356 & 3566.6626 & 350 & 30 & BM \\

146:  3567.5472 & 3567.6694 & 345 & 30 & BM \\

147: \hline

148: \multicolumn{5}{l}{$^*$ HJD - 2450000. $^\dagger$ Number of frames.} \\

149: \multicolumn{5}{l}{$^\ddagger$ Exposure times.} \\

150: \multicolumn{5}{l}{$^\S$ BM: L.A.G. Monard, 32-cm telescope, SBIG ST-7XME} \\

151: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Pretoria, South Africa.} \\

152: \multicolumn{5}{l}{AL: Alex Liu, 30-cm telescope, SBIG ST-7e} \\

153: \multicolumn{5}{l}{Exmouth, Australia.} \\

154: \end{tabular}

155: \end{center}

156: \end{table}

157: 

158: \section{Results}

159: 

160: \subsection{light curve}

161: 

162: \begin{figure}

163: \begin{center}

164: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{lc_rev1.eps}}

165: \end{center}

166: \caption{The entire light curve of the 2005 July superoutburst. The

167:  abscissa and the ordinate denote HJD$-$2400000 and $V$ magnitude,

168:  respectively. The open squares indicate the ASAS-3 photometry for

169:  which the typical error is within the size of the square. The duration

170:  of the plateau stage is at least 10 days, during which the object gradually

171:  fades at a rate of about 0.12 mag d$^{-1}$. }

172: \end{figure}

173: 

174: The overall light curve is represented in figure 1, in which the ASAS-3

175: observations are plotted by open squares as well. At onset of

176: our observation, 2QZ 0219 brightened up to 12.4 mag. After that,

177: the magnitude slightly declined at a rate of 0.12 mag d$^{-1}$, which is

178: a typical value of SU UMa stars. On HJD 2453565, 10 days after the epoch

179: of our first observation, the object plummeted at a rate of 1.54 mag d$^{-1}$,

180: after which 2QZ 0219 faded down to 17 mag. No rebrightening feature

181: was detected during our run. However, the presence of a rebrightening

182: after HJD 2453567 can not be ruled out.

183: 

184: \subsection{superhumps}

185: 

186: \begin{figure}

187: \begin{center}

188: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{pdm.eps}}

189: \end{center}

190: \caption{Theta diagram obtained by operating the PDM method to the data

191:  during the plateau stage after prewhitening. The best estimated period

192:  of superhumps is 0.081179(7) days.}

193: \end{figure}

194: 

195: 

196: Conspicuous superhumps were detected during the whole run. After

197: subtracting the linear declining trend, we performed a period analysis

198: using the phase dispersion minimization method (PDM)

199: \citep{ste78pdm}. We determined 0.081179 days as the best estimated

200: period of the superhump. Figure 2 shows the theta diagram for the plateau

201: stage. The error of the period was estimated using the Lafler-Kinman

202: class of methods, as applied by \citet{fer89error}.

203: 

204: \begin{figure}

205: \begin{center}

206: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{meanhump.eps}}

207: \end{center}

208: \caption{Phase-averaged superhumps during the plateau stage foleded by

209:  0.081179 days. A rapid rise and slow decline are characteristic of

210:  superhumps.}

211: \end{figure}

212: 

213: Figure 3 shows a phase-averaged superhump profile during the plateau

214: stage folded by 0.081179(7) days after subtracting a nightly decline

215: trend. As can be seen in figure 3, a rapid-rise and slow-decline, typical of superhump

216: profile among SU UMa stars, are remarkable. Daily-averaged superhump

217: profiles, folded by 0.081179(7) days, are depicted in figure 4. The shape

218: of the superhump variation was almost maintained with an amplitude of

219: ${\sim}$0.2 mag except the last two days of our run.

220: 

221: \begin{figure*}

222: \begin{center}

223: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53555.eps}}

224: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53556.eps}}

225: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53557.eps}}

226: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53558.eps}}

227: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53559.eps}}

228: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53561.eps}}

229: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53562.eps}}

230: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53563.eps}}

231: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53564.eps}}

232: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53565.eps}}

233: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53566.eps}}

234: \resizebox{53mm}{!}{\includegraphics{53567.eps}}

235: \end{center}

236: \caption{Daily averaged profile of the data folded by the 0.081179-d

237:  superhump period after subtracting the linear decline trend. The vertical

238:  and the horizontal axis denote the relative magnitude and phase,

239:  respectively. The epoch of phase is set on HJD 2455355.6025. The

240:  vertical axis is different for the last 2 runs.}

241: \end{figure*}

242: 

243: \subsection{superhump period change}

244: 

245: \begin{table}

246: \caption{Timing of superhump maxima.}

247: \begin{center}

248: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

249: \hline\hline

250: E$^*$ & HJD$^{\dagger}$ & err$^{\ddagger}$ \\

251: \hline

252: 0 & 3555.5997 & 0.001 \\

253: 12 & 3556.5737 & 0.003 \\

254: 13 & 3556.6534 & 0.001 \\

255: 24 & 3557.5484 & 0.001 \\

256: 25 & 3557.6333 & 0.001 \\

257: 36 & 3558.5258 & 0.002 \\

258: 37 & 3558.6071 & 0.004 \\

259: 49 & 3559.5766 & 0.001 \\

260: 50 & 3559.6569 & 0.001 \\

261: 74 & 3561.6093 & 0.001 \\

262: 86 & 3562.5787 & 0.001 \\

263: 87 & 3562.6615 & 0.001 \\

264: 98 & 3563.5524 & 0.003 \\

265: 99 & 3563.6333 & 0.002 \\

266: 111 & 3564.6055 & 0.005 \\

267: 123 & 3565.5734 & 0.002 \\

268: \hline

269: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^*$ Cycle count.} \\

270: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\dagger}$ HJD-2450000} \\

271: \multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{\ddagger}$ In the unit of day.} \\

272: \end{tabular}

273: \end{center}

274: \end{table}

275: 

276: We further examined the timing of the superhump maxima for the whole

277: superoutburst. The estimated superhump maxima are listed in table

278: 2. The typical error of each maximum is of the order of 0.002 days. A linear

279: regression for the values listed in table 2 yielded the following

280: equation, 

281: 

282: \begin{eqnarray}

283: HJD(max) &= 0.081113(19) \times E + 53555.6025(13),

284: \end{eqnarray}

285: 

286: where the values in the parentheses denote the errors. By fitting the

287: deviation of the observed timings from the above calculation, we derived

288: the best fitted quadratic equation as follows:

289: 

290: \begin{eqnarray}

291: O - C =& -3.98(1.35)\times10^{-3} + 2.15(0.55)\times10^{-4} E \nonumber \\

292:        & -1.77(0.44)\times 10^{-6} E^{2}.

293: \end{eqnarray}

294: 

295: This equation indicates $P_{\rm dot}$ = $\dot{P}$/$P$ =

296: $-$4.4(1.1)$\times$10$^{-5}$, which is an ordinary value for SU UMa

297: stars (\cite{uem05tvcrv}; \cite{ole05v660her}). Figure 5 shows the

298: obtained $O - C$ diagram, as well as the best fitted quadratic curve. 

299: 

300: \begin{figure}

301: \begin{center}

302: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{o-c.eps}}

303: \end{center}

304: \caption{$O - C$ diagram of the superhump maximum timings. The abscissa

305:  and ordinate mean the cycle count and $O - C$, respectively. A linear

306:  regression ($C$) and the best quadratic fit are given in equation (1)

307:  and (2), respectively. Note that the superhump period decreased with

308:  time.}

309: \end{figure}

310: 

311: \section{Discussion}

312: 

313: \subsection{recorded outbursts}

314: 

315: \begin{figure*}

316: \begin{center}

317: \resizebox{160mm}{!}{\includegraphics{asas3lc.eps}}

318: \end{center}

319: \caption{The long-term light curve of 2QZ 0219 taken from

320: the ASAS-3. The horizontal axis shows HJD-2450000, and the vertical axis

321:  shows $V$ magnitude. Filled circles and bottom triangles mean positive

322:  and negative observations, respectively. $V$ = 14.3 is the limiting

323:  magnitude.}

324: \end{figure*}

325: 

326: Thanks to the ASAS-3 survey \citep{poj02asas3}, we

327: can investigate the recorded outbursts over the past few

328: years. The long-term photometric behavior of 2QZ 0219 by ASAS-3 is

329: demonstrated in figure 6. From these data we judged the outburst type for

330: each outburst, and summarized it in table 3. Suspected superoutbursts

331: except the present one have been recorded on 2001 Sep. 15, 2002 Sep. 21,

332: and 2003 Sep. 10, so that we can roughly estimate the supercycle of the

333: object as follows:

334: 

335: \begin{equation}

336: T_{rec} = (3554.91624 - 2167.74163) / (3 + N),

337: \end{equation}

338: 

339: where N denotes the number of overlooked superoutbursts. With a little

340: algebra, we determine $T_{rec}$ = 346 $-$ 462 days. The

341: obtained supercycle length is a typical value of SU UMa-type

342: dwarf novae (\cite{kat03hodel}; \cite{nog97sxlmi}).

343: 

344: \begin{table}

345: \caption{Recorded outbursts}

346: \begin{center}

347: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}

348: \hline\hline

349: HJD & Mag & $T_{\rm min}$ & $T_{\rm max}$ & N & Type \\

350: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) \\

351: \hline

352: 1900.54153 & 12.96 & 5 & 18 & 3 & S: \\

353: 1955.53592 & 13.06 & 1 & 10 & 1 & N \\

354: 2167.74163 & 12.37 & 10 & 17 & 7 & S \\

355: 2225.62825 & 13.52 & 1 & 9 & 1 & N \\

356: 2538.78054 & 12.25 & 11 & 32 & 4 & S \\

357: 2704.50660 & 13.12 & 2 & 6 & 2 & N \\

358: 2892.83091 & 12.27 & 6 & 18 & 3 & S \\

359: 2950.66662 & 13.86 & 1 & 6 & 1 & N \\

360: 3017.66734 & 13.05 & 1 & 7 & 1 & N \\

361: 3417.57925 & 13.19 & 1 & 5 & 1 & N \\

362: 3554.91624 & 12.48 & 10 & 27 & 3 & S$^*$ \\

363: 3615.88048 & 13.10 & 1 & 15 & 1 & N \\

364: \hline

365: \multicolumn{6}{l}{Columns. $-$ (1) HJD$-$2450000; (2) Maximum magnitude} \\

366: \multicolumn{6}{l}{detected by ASAS-3; (3) Minimum outbursting duration} \\

367: \multicolumn{6}{l}{in the unit of day; (4) Maximum outbursting duration} \\

368: \multicolumn{6}{l}{in the unit of day; (5) Number of frames; (6) Type} \\

369: \multicolumn{6}{l}{of outbursts. N: normal outburst; S: superoutburst} \\

370: \multicolumn{6}{l}{$^*$ This work.} \\

371: \end{tabular}

372: \end{center}

373: \end{table}

374: 

375: \subsection{distance}

376: 

377: If the orbital period of the system and the magnitude of its normal

378: outburst are known, one can roughly estimate the distance to the object

379: by an empirical relation for dwarf novae with a low-mid

380: inclination. According to \citet{war87CVabsmag}, the absolute magnitude of

381: dwarf novae is given as a function of its orbital period,

382: 

383: \begin{eqnarray}

384: M_{V} &= 5.64(13) - 0.259(24) \times P, 

385: \end{eqnarray}

386: 

387: where $M_V$ and P mean the absolute magnitude of dwarf novae in $V$ at

388: the maximum of the normal outburst, and the orbital period in the unit

389: of hours, respectively. Unfortunately, we have no information about the

390: orbital period of 2QZ 0219. Instead, we settle for using the obtained

391: superhump period as $P$. This prescription is fairly valid because there

392: is enough evidence that the difference between the superhump period and

393: orbital period is only a few percent. In addition, the absence of an

394: eclipse during the whole superoutburst indicate that 2QZ 0219 is not a

395: high inclination system. Hence, we can safely use the above equation in

396: order to estimate a distance to the object. With a little algebra, a

397: plausible distance to 2QZ 0219 lies in 370(+20, -60) pc. This distance

398: should be checked by other methods in future.

399: 

400: \subsection{superhump period change}

401: High speed CCD photometry has revealed that SU UMa-type dwarf novae

402: show changes of the superhump period during the superoutburst. Most SU

403: UMa-type dwarf novae show a decrease in their superhump periods as the

404: superoutburst proceeds, presumably due to the shrinkage of the disk radius,

405: or to a natural consequence of mass depletion from the disk

406: \citep{osa85SHexcess}. Recently, it has turned out that several SU

407: UMa-type dwarf novae including WZ Sge-type stars increase the superhump

408: period with time\footnote{Recently, V1028 Cyg \citep{bab00v1028cyg} and

409: TT Boo \citep{ole04ttboo} showed

410: both increasing and decreasing superhump period. Similar behavior was

411: also observed in V1974 Cyg \citep{ret97v1974cygSH}, although the object is

412: classified as a permanent superhump system .}. Figure 7 represents period $-$

413: $P_{\rm dot}$ diagram for SU UMa-type stars. As for the cause of increasing

414: superhump period, \citet{uem05tvcrv} has given an insightful suggestion

415: that the radius of the accretion disk at the outburst maximum is related

416: to an increase or decrease of the superhump period. If the accretion

417: disk is spread out well beyond the 3:1 resonance radius, where an

418: eccentric mode sets in, the eccentric mode can propagate beyond the 3:1

419: resonance radius because there exists plenty mass in the outer region of

420: the accretion disk during the superoutburst\footnote{WZ Sge stars and

421: large-amplitude SU UMa stars meet this condition.}. If the argument by

422: \citet{uem05tvcrv} is correct, we can naturally explain why the

423: increasing period of superhumps is ${\it only}$ seen among WZ Sge-type

424: stars and SU UMa stars with large amplitudes.

425: 

426: In the case of 2QZ 0219, taking into account the results of negative

427: $P_{\rm dot}$ derivative and the above mentioned suggestion by

428: \citet{uem05tvcrv}, the radius of the accretion disk was not so large at

429: the superoutburst maximum, at most, as much as the 3:1 resonance

430: radius. Thus, the superhump period variation for 2QZ 0219 behaves as the

431: ``textbook'' SU UMa-type dwarf novae. In order to test the validity of

432: Uemura's implication, hydrodynamic simulation should be performed.

433: 

434: \begin{figure}

435: \begin{center}

436: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{pdot_dia.eps}}

437: \end{center}

438: \caption{$P_{\rm sh}$$-$$\dot{P}$ diagram of $O - C$ variation explored SU

439:  UMa stars. The location of 2QZ 0219 is designated as a

440:  filled circle. The data were originally taken from \citet{ima05gocom}.}

441: \end{figure}

442: 

443: \section{Summary}

444: 

445: The present photometric observations of 2QZ 0219 allowed us to

446: confirm a new member of SU UMa-type dwarf novae by detecting

447: superhumps. The best estimated superhumps period of J0219 was

448: 0.081113(19) days = 116.8 min, placing 2QZ 0219 near the lower edge of the

449: period gap. In conjunction with our observations and the ASAS-3 archival

450: data, the plateau stage of the superoutburst lasted at

451: most 20 days. The amplitude of the superoutburst exceeded 5 mag,

452: slightly larger than ordinary SU UMa-type dwarf novae but within the

453: normal range. An estimation of the recurrence time of the superoutburst

454: yielded ${\sim}$ 346 $-$ 462 days. We can roughly determine the distance

455: to 2QZ 0219 to be 370(+20, -60) pc. The resultant $O - C$ diagram,

456: together with the above results, led us to the conclusion that 2QZ 0219

457: is a new member of a prototypical SU UMa-type dwarf nova.

458: 

459: \vskip 3mm

460: 

461: We are grateful to many VSNET observers who have reported vital

462: observations. We would also express our gratitude to G. Pojmanski for

463: providing invaluable data of ASAS-3 observations. This work is supported

464: by a Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE ``Center for Diversity and

465: Universality in Physics'' from the Ministry of Education, Culture,

466: Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). This work is partly supported by

467: a grant-in aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,

468: Science and Technology (No. 16340057, 17740105).

469: 

470: \begin{thebibliography}{}

471: 

472: \bibitem[Baba et~al.(2000)]{bab00v1028cyg}

473:   Baba, H., Kato, T., Nogami, D., Hirata, R., Matsumoto, K., \& Sadakane, K.\

474:   2000, \pasj, 52, 429

475: 

476: \bibitem[Boyle et~al.(2000)]{boy002qz1}

477:   Boyle, B.~J., Shanks, T., Croom, S.~M., Smith, R.~J., Miller, L., Loaring,

478:   N., \& Heymans, C.\ 2000, \mnras, 317, 1014

479: 

480: \bibitem[Fernie(1989)]{fer89error}

481:   Fernie, J.~D.\ 1989, \pasp, 101, 225

482: 

483: \bibitem[Hellier(2001)]{hel01book}

484:   Hellier, C.\ 2001, Cataclysmic Variable Stars: how and why they vary

485:   (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)

486: 

487: \bibitem[Hoard et~al.(2002)]{hoa02CV2MASS}

488:   Hoard, D.~W., Wachter, S., Clark, L.~L., \& Bowers, T.~P.\ 2002, \apj, 565,

489:   511

490: 

491: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2005)]{ima05gocom}

492:   Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2005, \pasj, 57, 193

493: 

494: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2005)]{ima05j0137}

495:   Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2005, astro-ph/0510764

496: 

497: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2003)]{kat03hodel}

498:   Kato, T., Nogami, D., Moilanen, M., \& Yamaoka, H.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 989

499: 

500: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2004)]{kat04vsnet}

501:   Kato, T., Uemura, M., Ishioka, R., Nogami, D., Kunjaya, C., Baba, H., \&

502:   Yamaoka, H.\ 2004, \pasj, 56S, 1

503: 

504: \bibitem[Nogami et~al.(1997)]{nog97sxlmi}

505:   Nogami, D., Masuda, S., \& Kato, T.\ 1997, \pasp, 109, 1114

506: 

507: \bibitem[Olech et~al.(2004)]{ole04ttboo}

508:   Olech, A., Cook, L.~M., Z{\l}oczewski, K., Mularczyk, K., K\c{e}dzierski, P.,

509:   Udalski, A., \& Wisniewski, M.\ 2004, Acta Astron., 54, 2330

510: 

511: \bibitem[Olech et~al.(2005)]{ole05v660her}

512:   Olech, A., Z{\l}oczewski, K., Cook, L.~M., Mularczyk, K., K\c{e}dzierski, P.,

513:   \& Wisniewski, M.\ 2005, Acta Astron., 55, 237

514: 

515: \bibitem[Osaki(1985)]{osa85SHexcess}

516:   Osaki, Y.\ 1985, \aap, 144, 369

517: 

518: \bibitem[Osaki(1989)]{osa89suuma}

519:   Osaki, Y.\ 1989, \pasj, 41, 1005

520: 

521: \bibitem[Osaki(1996)]{osa96review}

522:   Osaki, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 39

523: 

524: \bibitem[Pojmanski(2002)]{poj02asas3}

525:   Pojmanski, G.\ 2002, Acta Astron., 52, 397

526: 

527: \bibitem[Retter et~al.(1997)]{ret97v1974cygSH}

528:   Retter, A., Leibowitz, E.~M., \& Ofek, E.~O.\ 1997, \mnras, 286, 745

529: 

530: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78pdm}

531:   Stellingwerf, R.~F.\ 1978, \apj, 224, 953

532: 

533: \bibitem[Uemura et~al.(2005)]{uem05tvcrv}

534:   Uemura, M., {et~al.}\ 2005, \aap, 432, 261

535: 

536: \bibitem[Warner(1987)]{war87CVabsmag}

537:   Warner, B.\ 1987, \mnras, 227, 23

538: 

539: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{war95book}

540:   Warner, B.\ 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge: Cambridge

541: 			    University Press)

542: 

543: \bibitem[Whitehurst(1988)]{whi88tidal}

544:   Whitehurst, R.\ 1988, \mnras, 232, 35

545: 

546: \end{thebibliography}

547: 

548: \end{document}

549: