1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file to temporarilly hash a tex file

3: %%

4: %% Modified 15 Feb 06

5: %% "Star's"

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8:  

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12:  

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17:  

18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19:  

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21:  

22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

24:  

25: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

26:  

27: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

28: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

29: %% the \begin{document} command.

30: %%

31: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

32: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

33: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

34: %% for information.

35:  

36: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

37: \newcommand{\myemail}{martin@isis.spa.umn.edu}

38:  

39: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

40:  

41: \slugcomment{Appearing in May 2006 PASP}

42:  

43: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

44: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

45: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

46: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

47: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

48: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

49:  

50: \shorttitle{6370 {\AA} in $\eta$ Car}

51: \shortauthors{Martin et al.}

52:  

53: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

54: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

55:  

56: \begin{document}

57: 

58: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

59: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

60: %% you desire.

61: 

62: \title{Variable Unidentified Emission Near 6307 {\AA} in $\eta$ Carinae\altaffilmark{1,2}}

63: \author{J. C. Martin\altaffilmark{3}}

64: \author{K. Davidson\altaffilmark{3}}

65: \author{F. Hamann\altaffilmark{4}}

66: \author{O. Stahl\altaffilmark{5}}

67: \author{K. Weis\altaffilmark{6,7}}

68: \altaffiltext{1}{This research is part of the Hubble Space Telescope

69:   Treasury Project for Eta Carinae, supported by grants GO-9420 and

70:   GO-9973 from the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), which is

71:   operated by the Association of Universities for Research in

72:   Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. }

73: \altaffiltext{2}{Partially based on observations obtained with UVES at

74:   the ESO Very Large Telescope, Paranal, Chile (proposals

75:   70.D-0607(a), 71.D-0168(A), and 072.D-0524(A))}

76: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of

77:   Minnesota, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455;

78:   martin@etacar.umn.edu}

79: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112055, Gainesville, FL 32611}

80: \altaffiltext{5}{Landessternwarte Heidelberg, K\"{o}nigsstuhl, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.}

81: \altaffiltext{6}{Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universit\"{a}t Bochum, Universit\"{a}tsstrasse 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany}

82: \altaffiltext{7}{Lise Meitner Fellow}

83: 

84: \begin{abstract}

85: We have discovered a conspicuous unidentified variable feature near

86: 6307 {\AA} in the spectrum of $\eta$ Carinae which is spatially

87: unresolved from the central star and its wind ($r \la$ 200--300 AU).

88: It is significant for two reasons:  such prominent unidentified

89: lines are now rare in this object, and this feature varies

90: strongly and systematically.  It exhibits a combination of

91: characteristics which, so far as we know are unique in $\eta$

92: Carinae's spectrum.  It may provide insights into the recurrent

93: spectroscopic events and the star's long-term brightening.

94: 

95: \end{abstract}

96: 

97: \keywords{binaries: general, line: profiles, stars: individual ($\eta$ Carinae), stars: variables: other, stars: winds, outflows}

98: 

99: \section{Introduction}

100: 

101: The spectrum of $\eta$ Carinae has been extensively studied and

102: characterized, but unexpected changes can happen during a

103: spectroscopic event like the one that occurred in mid-2003.  For

104: instance, surprisingly strong high-excitation \ion{He}{2} $\lambda$4687

105: briefly appeared at that time as reported by \citet{steiner},

106: \citet{uves} and \citet{heii}; see the last of those papers for an

107: analysis of its significance.  Motivated by this example, we have

108: examined Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data for other transient

109: features.  Our search yielded an undiagnosed emission feature at 6307

110: {\AA} with good signal-to-noise and unusual behavior.

111: 

112: These data were obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

113: (STIS), whose high spatial resolution allowed us to examine the

114: central star itself (or rather its inner wind) separate from the bright

115: nearby ejecta that contaminate all ground-based spectroscopy of $\eta$

116: Car (Figure \ref{ejectamap}).

117: 

118: The 6307 {\AA} feature is spatially unresolved from the continuum

119: emission of the central star and its wind in the STIS CCD data.  It

120: does not match any of the known atomic or molecular transitions of any

121: species that we expect to find in the spectrum (see \citet{thackeray},

122: \citet{zethsonphd} (Table \ref{zethson}), and \citet{PASPv113n788}

123: for extensive lists of species identified in $\eta$ Car).  This is a

124: significant discovery because, unlike the few other noticeable lines

125: that have not yet been identified, the 6307 {\AA} emission varies

126: conspicuously.  It is obviously correlated with $\eta$ Car's 5.5-year

127: spectroscopic period; indeed it temporarily disappeared during the

128: 1998 and 2003 spectroscopic events. Moreover, following the 2003 event

129: this feature became much stronger than it had been in the previous

130: cycle, possibly indicating a link with the rapid brightening and other

131: mysterious developments that have been superimposed on the 5.5-year

132: cycle since the mid-1990's \citep{davidson99a,etaphot,halpha}.

133: Altogether, it is unique in the small set of lines which remain

134: unidentified in $\eta$ Car's spectrum. 

135: 

136: \section{The Data}

137: \subsection{Spectra}

138: The HST/STIS spectra in this paper were obtained as part of the $\eta$

139: Carinae HST Treasury Project \citep{etatp} and were reduced using

140: a modified version of the Goddard CALSTIS reduction pipeline (Table

141: \ref{stisdata}).  The modified pipeline uses the normal HST bias

142: subtraction, flat fielding, and cosmic ray rejection procedures with

143: the addition of improved pixel interpolation and improved bad/hot

144: pixel removal.  Information regarding these modifications can be found

145: online at our web site\footnote{\tt http://etacar.umn.edu} and in a

146: forthcoming publication (Davidson et al., {\it in preparation\/}).

147: The spectra are reduced and extracted using approximately the same

148: parameters used by \citet{heii}.  Each one-dimensional STIS spectrum

149: discussed here is essentially a 0.1{\arcsec} x 0.25{\arcsec} spatial

150: sample:  the pixel size is about 0.05\arcsec, the slit width is about

151: 2 CCD columns, each spectral extraction sampled 5 CCD rows, and the

152: spectral resolution is roughly 52 km s$^{-1}$ at 6307\mbox{\AA}.  We

153: applied an aperture (extraction height) correction to the absolute

154: flux, based on an observation of the spectrophotometric standard BD

155: +75 325 with the same slit and extraction parameters.  Such details

156: have little effect on the main results of this paper.

157: 

158: In addition to the HST/STIS spectra, we used spectra of the central

159: star observed with the ESO VLT/UVES.  That observing program is

160: described in detail by \citet{uveshalpha} and \citet{weis05b}.  Each

161: one-dimensional UVES spectrum is a 0.30{\arcsec} x 0.91{\arcsec}

162: spatial sample:  the pixel size is about 0.182{\arcsec}, the slit

163: width is just under 2 CCD columns, each spectral extraction sampled 5

164: CCD rows, the seeing ranged from 0.5{\arcsec} to 1.3{\arcsec}, and the

165: spectral resolution is roughly 3.75 km s$^{-1}$ at 6307\mbox{\AA}.  We

166: corrected the wavelength scale to the heliocentric reference frame

167: using the IRAF procedure noao.rvcorrect.  These spectra

168: are not absolute flux calibrated. 

169: 

170: In ground-based spectra, like those from the VLT/UVES, strong

171: atmospheric absorption bands and emission lines from the bright ejecta

172: make it difficult at some wavelengths to detect even dramatic changes

173: in the spectrum of the central star.  In the VLT/UVES spectra, sharp

174: lined atmospheric O$_2$ absorption is observed around 6307\mbox{\AA}

175: and sharp nebular \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$6307.04 and \ion{Cr}{2}

176: $\lambda$6307.39 formed in the nearby ejecta are blended with

177: the stellar spectra.  The HST/STIS are

178: unlike ground-based observations in that they are free of atmospheric

179: absorption and specifically include only the region within $r \approx$

180: 200--300 AU of the central star.  Here ``the star'' or ``$\eta$

181: Carinae,'' means the central object and its wind, excluding the bright

182: ejecta and Homunculus nebula (Figure \ref{ejectamap}). If the star is

183: double then it is unresolved by the HST.  

184: 

185: \subsection{Photometry}

186: Figure \ref{nuvevent} uses HST ACS/HRC data obtained as part of the HST

187: treasury project.  These data are summarized in Table 3 of

188: \citet{etaphot}.  The bias-corrected, dark-subtracted, and

189: flat-fielded images were obtained from the Space Telescope Science

190: Institute via the Multi-Mission Archive (MAST)

191: \citep{acscal}\footnote{\tt http://archive.stsci.edu} and measured with

192: a 0.3$\arcsec$ radius ($\sim$ 10 ACS/HRC pixels) weighted aperture

193: described by \citet{etaphot}.  The measured flux is corrected to an

194: infinite aperture using factors we derived following \citet{acscal}

195: from archived observations of the star GD71.  The corrected fluxes

196: were converted to the STMAG system \citep{acscal} using the standard

197: photometry keywords provided by the STScI reduction pipeline in the

198: FITS headers.  

199: 

200: The ACS/HRC data are supplemented by photometry synthesized from

201: flux calibrated STIS CCD spectra.  A summary of the spectra 

202: are given in Table \ref{stisdata}.  They were extracted with a

203: cross dispersion weighting function which matched the 0.3$\arcsec$

204: aperture used to measure the ACS/HRC images.  We applied an aperture

205: (extraction height) correction based on an observation of the

206: spectrophotometric standard star BD +75 325 with the same slit and

207: extraction techniques.  The spectra were convolved with the published

208: ACS/HRC filter and CCD response functions and then integrated to

209: obtain synthetic fluxes.  Finally, the synthetic fluxes were adjusted

210: to the STMAG system by comparing the synthetic results to results from

211: ACS/HRC observations on the same day (MJD 52682). 

212: 

213: \section{Overview of the Feature}

214: The unidentified emission feature appeared in the wing of the

215: \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$6319 line near 6307\mbox{\AA} (Figure

216: \ref{6306evol}, Figure \ref{6306evoluves} and Table \ref{tab6307}).

217: It had a FWHM of about 150 -- 180 km s$^{-1}$ which is narrower than

218: the stellar wind features (FWHM $\approx$ 300 - 500 km s$^{-1}$) but

219: significantly broader than the nebular emission from the surrounding

220: bright ejecta (FWHM $\approx$ 10 km s$^{-1}$

221: \citep{zethsonphd}\footnote{The spectral resolution of the STIS was

222:   roughly 52 km s$^{-1}$ at 6307\mbox{\AA}.  Therefore, the

223:   spectral width of the nebular emission lines is not resolved in the

224:   STIS/CCD data.}). 

225: 

226: The feature is also present in the spectrum of the star reflected by

227: the Homunculus lobes (see the VLT/UVES FOS4 slit setting described by

228: \citet{uveshalpha}).  The equivalent width of the feature is smaller

229: there.  However there is no variation of its profile along the UVES

230: slit except for the radial velocity shift introduced by motion of the

231: reflecting ejecta.  This leads us to conclude that, unlike H$\alpha$

232: \citep{smith03}, there is no obvious variation of this feature with

233: stellar latitude. 

234: 

235: \section{Identification}

236: We have been unable to find any known transitions consistent with

237: other lines present in the spectrum that match this feature.  We ruled

238: out \ion{S}{2} $\lambda$6307 because none of the associated

239: transitions with similar levels and oscillator strengths at

240: 6314.4\mbox{\AA}, 6288.6\mbox{\AA}, or 6288.0\mbox{\AA} appeared in

241: the spectrum. Another possible identification may be [\ion{O}{1}]

242: $\lambda$6302.0 redshifted by 100 -- 200 km s$^{-1}$.  Nearly all the

243: atomic oxygen in the wind of the central star is probably ionized.

244: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$1302, $\lambda$1307, and $\lambda$1306 are present

245: in the HST/MAMA data but they are {\em blueshifted} by 400 to 500

246: km/s.  However, the [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6365 is not present and a

247: 100 km s$^{-1}$ redshift would be anomalous.  Therefore, the

248: 6307\mbox{\AA} emission is probably not [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6302.0.

249: \citet{thackeray}, \citet{damineli1998}, \citet{PASPv113n788}, and

250: \citet{zethsonphd} reported [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$6302.0 in their

251: spectra, but the line they describe is narrow, redshifted, and

252: originates in the surrounding bright ejecta, not the central star

253: (Figure \ref{ejectamap}).  Its wavelength obviously differs from the

254: feature that we discuss.  

255: 

256: We considered emission pumped by Lyman $\alpha$, Since $\eta$ Car is a

257: significant source of Lyman $\alpha$ emission, and resonance with that

258: emission plays a role in the formation of other features

259: \citep{heii,johansson94,zethsoncrii}.  We found three transitions between 6305

260: {\AA} -- 6309 {\AA} that are resonant with absorption features within 

261: 3 {\AA} of Lyman $\alpha$:  \ion{Cr}{2} $\lambda$6305.75 (resonant with

262: $\lambda$1213.499),  \ion{Cr}{3}] $\lambda$6306.8 (resonant with

263: $\lambda$1215.781), and \ion{Fe}{3}] $\lambda$6306.43 (resonant with

264: $\lambda$1213.41).  The oscillator strengths have not been measured for

265: any of these transitions.  While all these species appear in the

266: nebular spectra of the nearby ejecta, they are not found in the

267: stellar spectrum.  Furthermore, we do not see these specific

268: transitions in the nebular spectra along with other previously

269: identified resonance type features.  Altogether it is difficult to judge

270: the likelihood of these possible identifications.  However, there is

271: some appeal to identifying it as an ionized metal line, since aspects

272: of its variability are similar to those exhibited by the broad

273: components of the \ion{Fe}{2} lines and the metal absorption

274: forest around 2500{\AA} (see next section).  

275: 

276: There is an emission line in the spectrum of the surrounding ejecta and

277: Weigelt Knots at 6306.3 \mbox{\AA} which \citet{zethsonphd} identified

278: as \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$6307.04 and \ion{Cr}{2} $\lambda$6307.39

279: (Table \ref{zethson}). That line in the spectrum of the ejecta has a

280: much sharper profile (FWHM $\approx$ 10 km s$^{-1}$) than

281: 6307\mbox{\AA} in the spectrum of the star.  \ion{Fe}{2}

282: $\lambda$6307.0 and \ion{Cr}{2} $\lambda$6307.4 are also clearly

283: formed in the area of extended emission within half an arc second of

284: the star that is resolved by the HST/STIS.  They are not found in the

285: spectrum of the star itself, whereas the region emitting

286: 6307\mbox{\AA} is spatially unresolved from the central star (Figure

287: \ref{ejectamap}). 

288: 

289: \section{Variability of the Feature}

290: The 6307\mbox{\AA} feature {\em disappeared} during the 1998.0 and

291: 2003.5 spectroscopic events (Figure \ref{6306vstime}) at the same time

292: when the Hydrogen Balmer absorption strengthened and broad high

293: excitation emission (such as \ion{He}{1}) weakened.  It gradually

294: declined in flux over the six months prior to the 2003.5 event but

295: just before disappearing completely its decline was interrupted by a

296: brief upward tick in brightness lasting a few weeks (Figure

297: \ref{nuvevent}).  The only other component of the spectrum exhibiting

298: similar behavior just preceding the event is the ``iron curtain'' of

299: blanketed near-ultraviolet (NUV) absorption.  One plausible

300: explanation for this brief ``hiccup'' is a sudden change in ionization

301: caused by a increase in the ionizing flux from the central star.  In

302: that case, 6307\mbox{\AA} is a metal line whose population is markedly

303: increased as the species in the ``iron curtain'' are further ionized

304: and temporarily depleted.  

305: 

306: The 6307 {\AA} feature also evolved much more than most other lines

307: between the spectroscopic events.  A similar degree of activity is

308: observed in the broad components of the \ion{Fe}{2} lines formed in

309: the central star's wind (Figure \ref{feiiflux}).  Note that around

310: 2001 (at a time between spectroscopic events), 6307 {\AA} is anti-correlated

311: with \ion{Fe}{2} emission.   Like the NUV flux, a rise in 6307 {\AA}

312: brightness was anti-correlated with \ion{Fe}{2} emission.

313: 

314: The aspects of variability which 6307 {\AA} shares with \ion{Fe}{2}

315: indicate that it is probably also an ionized metal line formed in the

316: stellar wind.  The most viable candidates are the transitions we noted

317: as being in resonance with Lyman $\alpha$ (\ion{Cr}{2}

318: $\lambda$6305.75, \ion{Cr}{3}] $\lambda$6306.8, and \ion{Fe}{3}]

319:     $\lambda$6306.43).  For obvious reasons, \ion{Fe}{3}]

320:       $\lambda$6306.43 is the most enticing option. Unfortunately, the

321:       atomic data for that transition is lacking so that we are unable

322:       to confirm our suspicions. 

323: 

324: \section{Mid-Cycle Phenomena:  Evidence for Extra-Cyclical Processes?}

325: 

326: In most proposed explanations of the 5.5-year spectroscopic period

327: {\em there is no obvious reason to expect much variability in

328:   mid-cycle}, e.g., during 1999--2001 halfway between the 1998.0 and

329: 2003.5 spectroscopic events.  In the most popular scenario describing

330: these events, the cycle is regulated by a companion star in a highly

331: eccentric orbit as sketched in Figure \ref{orbitfig}.   At distances

332: of 20--30 AU from the primary star, where the hypothetical companion

333: should have been during 1999--2001, relevant wind densities are

334: factors of 30 to 100  smaller than at periastron.  Column densities

335: are correspondingly small and the motion is quite slow.  Therefore we

336: do not expect orbital motion alone to precipitate appreciable

337: spectroscopic changes during that part of the cycle.  Analogous

338: comments can be made if the 5.5-year  period is a single-star

339: thermal/rotational recovery cycle between  outbursts, although such

340: models are admittedly less definite.  For these reasons, any rapid or

341: pronounced changes observed in 1999--2001 were most likely {\it not\/}

342: due to the 5.5-year cycle; instead they probably give us information

343: about LBV-like random fluctuations in the stellar wind.  If this

344: statement is wrong, then the mid-cycle variations reveal an aspect of

345: the cycle that has no explanation in any proposed models.  In either

346: case it is important to study the features that did vary then.  Among

347: them the unidentified 6307 {\AA} varied most strongly.  

348: 

349: In our HST/STIS data during the 1998--2003 cycle this line was

350: brightest in 2001.29 (MJD 52016.8).  Our temporal sampling was too

351: sparse to indicate the true peak, but on that occasion the line was

352: more than twice as strong as it had been in 1999-2000 (Figure

353: \ref{6306vstime}).

354: 

355: Meanwhile, several other changes occurred in 2001, about the same time

356: as the maximum 6307 {\AA} strength:

357: \begin{itemize}

358: \item{A 0.05 magnitude dip in J, H, and K brightness \citep{whitelock},} 

359: \item{A roughly 20\% increase in near-ultraviolet flux around

360:   1800\mbox{\AA} over the course of nine months,}

361: \item{A 15\%--20\% fluctuation in flux emitted in the broad components of

362:   the \ion{Fe}{2} lines formed in the stellar wind over the course of

363:   nine to twelve months (see Fig. \ref{feiiflux}),} 

364: \item{An 20\%--30\% decrease in Hydrogen Balmer P-Cygni absorption

365:   \citep{halpha},}

366: \item{A 10\%--20\% increase in the total Hydrogen Balmer emission flux

367:   \citep{halpha},}  

368: \item{A sudden and significant increase in the strength of the

369:   narrow $-140$ km s$^{-1}$ absorption feature in the Hydrogen Balmer lines.} 

370: \end{itemize}

371: While these events were simultaneous, we have no proof that they are

372: physically related.  There is no clear reason or explanation why

373: any feature should undergo significant change in the {\em middle} of

374: the spectroscopic cycle.  As noted, in almost any binary star model

375: of the 5.5-year cycle, the two components were far apart and moving

376: slowly in 2001.  The moderate changes listed above may perhaps be

377: ascribed to ordinary LBV-like fluctuations.  Although taken all

378: together at the same time they are suggestive of some other process at

379: work in addition to the spectroscopic cycle.  This aspect of the

380: overall problem of mid-cycle behavior has received little attention to

381: date.

382: 

383: After the maximum, the emission feature slowly faded over

384: the next two years until it disappeared completely in the lead up to

385: the 2003.5 event.  After the event, the feature recovered.  However

386: on MJD 53413 and MJD 53448 the flux of the feature was more than twice

387: the flux it had at the same phase a cycle earlier

388: (approximately MJD 51500).  The fact that the behavior of the feature

389: appears to be different from cycle to cycle suggests that it is

390: affected by some additional parameter, i.e. the long-term brightening

391: trend of the central star.

392: 

393: \section{Summary}

394: We have discovered a previously unidentified emission feature in

395: the spectrum of $\eta$ Carinae:  a single emission line at

396: 6307\mbox{\AA}.  This feature is important because: 

397: \begin{itemize}

398: \item{The visual light spectrum of $\eta$ Carinae has been extensively

399:   studied and only about 3\% of the features remain unidentified

400:   \citep{zethsonphd}.}

401: \item{This feature's variability appears to be associated with the

402:   variability of \ion{Fe}{2} in the wind of the central star.} 

403: \item{It evolves in a unique way with time and thus may

404:   provide clues to the nature of the spectroscopic cycle and/or long-term

405:   brightening trend.} 

406: \item{The peak in the flux of the feature coincided with several

407:   other mid-spectroscopic cycle changes in the spectrum that we

408:   cannot explain.} 

409: \item{The 6307\mbox{\AA} feature is associated with the

410:   spectroscopic cycle, but its behavior does not reproduce

411:   exactly from one cycle to the next.}

412: \end{itemize}

413: 

414: This feature is visible in some spectra of the central

415: star and its wind, but not others during the last seven years.

416: We are unable to match it to any published atomic or molecular

417: transitions of species which we expect to find in the spectrum based

418: on other lines present.  Its unidentified and transient nature make

419: it fairly unique in the spectrum of $\eta$ Carinae.  Its disappearance

420: and reappearance correlated with the spectroscopic events, implying

421: that it is associated with the spectroscopic cycle.  Its mid-cycle

422: peak and cycle-to-cycle changes are also sufficiently different from

423: other identified features so that it deserves special attention.

424: 

425: The 6307\mbox{\AA} feature is visible in ground-based spectra despite

426: being blended with atmospheric O$_2$ absorption and emission from the

427: surrounding ejecta.  We encourage our colleagues in the southern

428: hemisphere to look for it since it varies between spectroscopic events

429: and tracking these variations with better temporal sampling may help

430: provide further insight into the 5.5-year cycle or the recent dramatic

431: brightening of the central star. 

432: 

433: \section{Acknowledgments}

434: This work made use of the NIST Atomic Spectra

435: Database\footnote{http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/index.html}

436: and the Kentucky Atomic Line List

437: v2.04\footnote{http://www.pa.uky.edu/$\sim$peter/atomic/index.html}. 

438: We also wish to thank M. Salvo (ANU) for generously using some of her

439: time on the MSO 2.3m to obtain current ground-based spectra for us.

440: T.R. Gull (NASA/GSFC) prepared most of the detailed STIS observing

441: plans, gave other valuable help in the Treasury Program.  Meanwhile,

442: K. Ishibashi (MIT) produced the improved reduction software and

443: contributed to the observing plans.  We also thank S Johansson, H

444: Hartman (University of Lund), and M. Bautista (Inst. Venezolano

445: Invest. Cientifica) for comments on an early version of this paper,

446: and Beth Periello (STScI) for assistance with the HST observing plan.  

447: 

448: \clearpage

449: \begin{thebibliography}{}

450: %added reference

451: \bibitem[Damineli et al.(1998)]{damineli1998} Damineli, A., Stahl, O., Kaufer, A., Wolf, B., Quast, G., \& Lopes, D.~F.\ 1998, \aaps, 133, 299 

452: %end added reference

453: \bibitem[Damineli et al.(1999)]{damineli1999} Damineli, A., Viotti,

454:   R., Stahl, A.~K.~O., Wolf, B., \& de Ara{\' u}jo, F.~X.\ 1999, ASP

455:   Conf.~Ser.~179: Eta Carinae at The Millennium, 196 

456: \bibitem[Davidson et al.(1995)]{davidsonetal95} Davidson, K., Ebbets, D., Weigelt, G., Humphreys, R.~M., Hajian, A.~R., Walborn, N.~R., \& Rosa, M.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 1784 

457: \bibitem[Davidson \& Humphreys(1997)]{davidsonhumphreys1997} Davidson, K.~\& Humphreys, R.~M.\ 1997, \araa, 35, 1 

458: \bibitem[Davidson et al.(1999)]{davidson99a} Davidson, K.~et al.\

459:   1999, \aj, 118, 1777

460: \bibitem[Davidson et al.(2000)]{davidson2000} Davidson, K., Ishibashi, K., Gull, T.~R., Humphreys, R.~M., \& Smith, N.\ 2000, \apjl, 530, L107 

461: \bibitem[Davidson(2002)]{davidson2002} Davidson, K.\ 2002, ASP Conf.~Ser.~262: The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, 267 

462: \bibitem[Davidson(2004)]{etatp} Davidson, K.\ 2004, STScI Newsletter,

463:   Spring 2004, 1, http://sco.stsci.edu/newsletter/PDF/2004/spring\_04.pdf

464: \bibitem[Davidson et al.(2005)]{halpha} Davidson, K.~et al.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 900

465: %added referenc

466: \bibitem[Davis et al.(2001)]{davis01} Davis, M., Campbell, D., Sticka, R., Faful, B. Leidecker, H., Kimbel, R., \& Goudfrooij, P.\ 2001, STIS Failure Review Board Final Report (Baltimore: STSci)

467: %end added reference

468: \bibitem[Hamann \& Persson(1989)]{1989ApJS...71..931H} Hamann, F.~\& Persson, S.~E.\ 1989, \apjs, 71, 931 

469: \bibitem[Hamann, Depoy, Johansson, \& Elias(1994)]{hamann1994} Hamann,

470:   F., Depoy, D.~L., Johansson, S., \& Elias, J.\ 1994, \apj, 422, 626 

471: \bibitem[Hofmann \& Weigelt(1988)]{hw88} Hofmann, K.-H., \& Weigelt, G. 1988, \aap, 203, L21

472: \bibitem[Ishibashi(2001)]{bishorbit} Ishibashi, K.\ 2001, ASP Conf.~Ser.~242: Eta Carinae and Other Mysterious Stars: The Hidden Opportunities of Emission Spectroscopy, 53 

473: \bibitem[Johansson \& Hamman(1994)]{johansson94} Johansson, S.~\& Hamman, F.~W.\ 1994, Phys. Scr., T47, 157

474: \bibitem[Martin \& Koppelman(2004)]{etaphot} Martin, J.~C., \& Koppelman, M.~D.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 2352 

475: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2006)]{heii} Martin, J.~C., et al.\ 2006, \apj, in press March 2006

476: %added reference

477: \bibitem[Proffitt et al.(2002)]{proffitt02} Proffitt, C.~R.~et al.\ 2002, The 2002 HST Calibration Workshop : Hubble after the Installation of the ACS and the NICMOS Cooling System, Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, October 17 and 18, 2002.~ Edited by Santiago Arribas, Anton Koekemoer, and Brad Whitmore.~Baltimore, MD: Space Telescope Science Institute, 2002., p.97, 97

478: %end added reference

479: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{acscal} Sirianni, M., et al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1049 

480: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2003)]{smith03} Smith, N., Davidson, K., Gull, T.~R., Ishibashi, K., \& Hillier, D.~J.\ 2003, \apj, 586, 432

481: \bibitem[Stahl et al.(2005)]{uves} Stahl, O., Weis, K., 

482: Bomans, D.~J., Davidson, K., Gull, T.~R., \& Humphreys, R.~M.\ 2005, \aap, 

483: 435, 303 

484: \bibitem[Steiner \& Damineli(2004)]{steiner} Steiner, J.~E., \& Damineli, A.\ 2004, \apjl, 612, L133 

485: \bibitem[Thackeray(1953)]{thackeray} Thackeray, A.~D.\ 1953, \mnras, 113, 211 

486: \bibitem[Wallerstein et al.(2001)]{PASPv113n788} Wallerstein, G., 

487: Gilroy, K.~K., Zethson, T., Johansson, S., \& Hamann, F.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 

488: 1210 

489: \bibitem[Whitelock et al.(2004)]{whitelock} Whitelock, P.~A., Feast, M.~W., Marang, F., \& Breedt, E.\ 2004, \mnras, 352, 447

490: \bibitem[Weis et al.(2005a)]{uveshalpha} Weis, K., Stahl, O., Bomans, D.~J., Davidson, K., Gull, T.~R., \& Humphreys, R.~M.\ 2005a, \aj, 129, 1694 

491: \bibitem[Weis et al.(2005b)]{weis05b} Weis, K., Bomans, D.~J., Stahl, O., Davidson, K., Humphreys, R.~M., \& Gull, T.~R.\ 2005b, ASP Conf.~Ser.~332: The Fate of the Most Massive Stars, 332, 162 

492: \bibitem[Zanella et al.(1984)]{zanellaetal1984} Zanella, R., Wolf, B., \& Stahl, O.\ 1984, \aap, 137, 79

493: \bibitem[Zethson(2001a)]{zethsonphd} Zethson, T.\ 2001a, Ph.D.~Thesis, Lunds Universitet

494: \bibitem[Zethson et al.(2001b)]{zethsoncrii} Zethson, T., Hartman, H., Johansson, S., Gull, T., Ishibashi, K., \& Davidson, K.\ 2001b, ASP Conf.~Ser.~242: Eta Carinae and Other Mysterious Stars: The Hidden Opportunities of Emission Spectroscopy, 242, 97 

495: \end{thebibliography}

496: 

497: \clearpage

498: \begin{figure}

499: \figurenum{1}

500: \label{ejectamap}

501: \includegraphics[scale=2.]{f1.eps}

502: \caption{Spatial distribution of ejecta mentioned in text.  Top:

503:    A map of the Homunculus based on HST/WFPC2 images.  The small

504:    rectangle is the region shown at the bottom.  Lower left:

505:    HST/ACS image of the inner region, using filter F330W (near UV)

506:    in 2005.  Lower right:  Relative locations of the slow-moving

507:    ``Weigelt blobs'' BCD specified by \citet{hw88}, expanded by

508:    20\% to allow for motions.  The spatial scale throughout this

509:    figure is adjusted to epoch 2005. }

510: \end{figure}

511: 

512: 

513: \begin{figure}

514: \figurenum{2}

515: \label{6306evol}

516: \includegraphics[scale=.75]{f2.eps}

517: \caption{Plots of the HST/STIS spectra.  Top five panels:  Plots of

518:   the 6307\mbox{\AA} emission on the dates that it was unambiguously

519:   present.  The gray region in each plot gives the range of relative

520:   flux values when the emission was definitely not present during the

521:   2003.5 spectroscopic event.  Bottom panel:  A plot of the average

522:   scaled flux and the flux recorded on MJD 52459.7 over an expanded

523:   wavelength range.  The dotted box marks the area plotted in the

524:   previous panels.}   

525: \end{figure}

526: 

527: \begin{figure}

528: \figurenum{3}

529: \label{6306evoluves}

530: \includegraphics[scale=.75]{f3.eps}

531: \caption{Same as for Fig \ref{6306evol} except for the VLT/UVES spectra.}  

532: \end{figure}

533: 

534: \begin{figure}

535: \figurenum{4}

536: \label{6306vstime}

537: \includegraphics[scale=.75]{f4.eps}

538: \caption{The equivalent width of 6307\mbox{\AA} emission in the

539:   HST/STIS data (diamonds) and VLT/UVES (boxes) in the spectrum of 

540:   the central star versus time.  The vertical ticks on each point are

541:   1$\sigma$ error bars given in Table \ref{tab6307}.  The

542:   dotted vertical line marks the time of the 2003.5 spectroscopic

543:   event.} 

544: \end{figure}

545: 

546: \begin{figure}

547: \figurenum{5}

548: \label{nuvevent}

549: \includegraphics[scale=.75]{f5.eps}

550: \caption{Top:  NUV in the F250W filter measured with the ACS/HRC

551:   (diamonds) and synthesized from flux calibrated STIS/CCD spectra

552:   (crosses).  The statistical 1$\sigma$ error of each data point is

553:   0.01--0.02 mag (smaller than the size of the symbols)  Bottom:

554:   Equivalent width of 6307 {\AA} measured in the STIS/CCD spectra with

555:   1$\sigma$ error bars estimated from the S/N of the continuum.  The

556:   vertical dashed line marks the time of the disappearance of the

557:   \ion{He}{1} line on MJD 52819.8 during the 2003.5 event.}

558: \end{figure}

559: 

560: \begin{figure}

561: \figurenum{6}

562: \label{feiiflux}

563: \includegraphics[scale=.75]{f6.eps}

564: \caption{Top:  \ion{Fe}{2} 5529 flux (continuum subtracted) measured

565:   in STIS/CCD spectra.  The 1$\sigma$ error in these data are about

566:   the size of the plotted symbols.  Bottom:  Equivalent width of 6307 {\AA}

567:   measured in STIS/CCD spectra (triangles) and VLT/UVES spectra

568:   (crosses) with 1$\sigma$ error bars.  The vertical dashed line marks

569:   the time of the 2003.5 event.}

570: \end{figure}

571: 

572: \begin{figure}

573: \figurenum{7}

574: \label{orbitfig}

575: \includegraphics[scale=.40]{f7.eps}

576: \caption{Between 1999.0 and 2002.0 the when the 6306 {\AA} feature was

577:   still varying the secondary was well separated from the primary.

578:   The time of periasteron is uncertain by several weeks but has little

579:   effect on this sketch.} 

580: \end{figure}

581: 

582: \begin{deluxetable}{lllrrr}

583: \tablewidth{0pt}

584: \tabletypesize{\small}

585: \tablecolumns{5}

586: \tablecaption{Narrow Nebular Emission Lines Identified By Zethson Near 6307{\AA}\tablenotemark{a}\label{zethson}}

587: \tablehead{\colhead{$\lambda_{obs}$ {\AA}}&\colhead{Species}&

588:   \colhead{Transition}&\colhead{$\lambda_{lab}$}&\colhead{Notes\tablenotemark{b}}} 

589: \startdata

590: 6256.56&\ion{Fe}{2}(34)&$b^4F_{3/2}-z^6D_{3/2}$&6257.08&\nodata\\

591: 6261.88&[\ion{Fe}{2}](44F)&$a^2G_{9/2}-b^2F_{5/2}$&6265.93&\nodata\\

592: 6265.17&[\ion{V}{2}]&$a^3D_1-b^1F_3$&6265.93&id?\\

593: \nodata&[\ion{V}{2}]&$b^3G_3-d^3P_1$&6266.33&id?\\

594: \nodata&[\ion{V}{2}]&$a^3G_5-d^3F_4$&6266.34&id?\\

595: 6270.62&\ion{Fe}{2}&$b^2H_{11/2}-z^6P_{3/2}$&6271.70&\nodata\\

596: 6276.44&[\ion{Fe}{2}](15F)&$a^4F_{7/2}-a^2P_{3/2}$&6277.2&\nodata\\

597: 6280.81&[\ion{Fe}{2}]&$a^2D2_{3/2}-a^2S_{1/2}$&6281.69&\nodata\\

598: \nodata&\ion{Fe}{2}]&$b^4F_{5/2}-z^6D_{5/2}$&6281.56&\nodata\\

599: 6287.00&[\ion{Mn}{2}]&$a^5D_2-a^3P_1$&6287.77&\nodata\\

600: 6292.65&\ion{Fe}{2}&$(^5D)4d^4P_{3/2}-(^5D_0)4f^2[3]_{5/2}$&6293.57&?E$_u$\\

601: 6297.32&Unidentified&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\

602: 6301.14&[\ion{O}{1}](1F)&$2p^4~^3P_2-2p^4~^1D_2$&6302.05&\nodata\\

603: 6306.3&\ion{Fe}{2}(200)&$c^4F_{9/2}-x^4F_{9/2}$&6307.47&\nodata\\

604: \nodata&\ion{Cr}{2}&$b^2P_{3/2}-y^2P_{3/2}$&6307.39&\nodata\\

605: 6308.51&\ion{Fe}{2}(34)&$b^4F_{7/2}-z^6D_{7/2}$&6309.27&\nodata\\

606: 6312.82&[\ion{S}{3}](3F)&$3p^2~^1D_2-3p^2~^1S_0$&6313.81&Not in 98\\

607: 6318.77&\ion{Fe}{2}&$z^4D_{7/2}-c^4D_{7/2}$&6319.73&4p-4s\\

608: 6347.95&\ion{Si}{2}(2)&$4s~^2S_{1/2}-4p~^2P_{3/2}$&6348.84&\nodata\\

609: 6357.83&\ion{Fe}{2}&$(^5D)4d~^4P_{5/2}-(^5D_2)4f^2[4]_{7/2}$&6358.92&?E$_u$\\

610: \nodata&[\ion{Mn}{2}]&$a^5D_0-a^3P_1$&6359.21&\nodata\\

611: \enddata

612: \tablenotetext{a}{From \citet{zethsonphd}.}

613: \tablenotetext{b}{Taken from the ``Notes'' column of Zethson's tables:

614:   id? = uncertain identification; ?E$_u$ = \ion{Fe}{2} and \ion{Cr}{2}

615:   transitions with an upper level $\ge$ 10 eV and the excitation

616:   mechanism is ``questionable'';  Not in 98 = Not present in the spectrum

617:   observed just after the 1998.0 spectroscopic event; 4p-4s = a 4p-4s

618:   transition.} 

619: \end{deluxetable}

620: 

621: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}

622: \tablewidth{0pt}

623: \tabletypesize{\tiny}

624: \tablecolumns{7}

625: \tablecaption{HST STIS Data\label{stisdata}}

626: \tablehead{

627: \colhead{Root}&&&\colhead{Slit Angle}&&\colhead{Central

628:   $\lambda$}&\colhead{Exp Length}\\

629: \colhead{Name}&\colhead{MJD}&\colhead{Slit}&\colhead{(deg)\tablenotemark{a}}

630: &\colhead{Grating}&\colhead{({\AA})}&\colhead{(sec)}}

631: \startdata

632: \multicolumn{7}{c}{6307{\AA} Observations}\\

633: \hline

634: o4j801120&50891.7&52x0.1&-28.&G750M&6252&9.4\\

635: o556020p0&51230.6&52x0.1&-28.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

636: o5kz010m0&51623.9&52x0.1&-28.&G750M&6252&10.0\\

637: o62r010l0&52016.8&52x0.1&+22.&G750M&6252&10.0\\

638: o6ex020l0&52294.1&52x0.1&-82.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

639: o6mo02150&52459.7&52x0.1&+69.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

640: o8gm12050&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

641: o8gm330r0&52776.6&52x0.1&+38.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

642: o8gm521s0&52792.0&52x0.1&+62.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

643: o8gm520h0&52812.2&52x0.1&+70.&G750M&6252&15.0\\

644: o8ma820a0&52852.0&52x0.1&+105.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

645: o8ma920z0&52904.5&52x0.1&+153.&G750M&6252&8.0\\

646: o8ma940r0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G750M&6252&10.0\\

647: \hline

648: \multicolumn{7}{c}{\ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$5529 Observations}\\

649: \hline

650: o4j8010d0&50891.5&52x0.1&-28&G750M&5734&15.0\\

651: o55602090&51230.5&52x0.1&-28&G750M&5734&15.0\\

652: o62r01090&52016.8&52x0.1&+21&G750M&5734&8.0\\

653: o6ex030b0&52183.1&52x0.1&+165&G750M&5734&15.0\\

654: o6ex02090&52294.0&52x0.1&-82&G750M&5734&6.0\\

655: o6mo020i0&52459.6&52x0.1&+69&G750M&5734&9.0\\

656: o8gm120a0&52682.9&52x0.1&-57&G750M&5734&6.0\\

657: o8gm210d0&52727.3&52x0.1&-28&G750M&5734&9.0\\

658: o8gm410d0&52764.4&52x0.1&+27&G750M&5734&9.0\\

659: o8gm320i0&52778.6&52x0.1&+38&G750M&5734&9.0\\

660: o8gm520i0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62&G750M&5734&9.0\\

661: o8gm620i0&52814.0&52x0.1&+70&G750M&5734&9.0\\

662: o8ma720h0&52825.4&52x0.1&+69&G750M&5734&9.0\\

663: o8ma820j0&52852.0&52x0.1&+105&G750M&5734&6.0\\

664: o8ma920b0&52904.4&52x0.1&+153&G750M&5734&6.0\\

665: o8ma830d0&52960.7&52x0.1&-142&G750M&5734&8.0\\

666: o8ma94080&53071.3&52x0.1&-28&G750M&5734&6.0\\

667: \hline

668: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Spectra Used to Synthesize ACS/HRC F250W Fluxes}\\

669: \hline

670: o8gm12030&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

671: o8gm12090&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2557&800.0\\

672: o8gm120b0&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

673: o8gm120c0&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

674: o8gm120d0&52682.9&52x0.1&-57.&G430M&3423&90.0\\

675: o8gm120h0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&1995&600.0\\

676: o8gm120l0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2135&600.0\\

677: o8gm120n0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

678: o8gm120r0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2416&320.0\\

679: o8gm120t0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2976&340.0\\

680: o8gm120w0&52683.0&52x0.1&-57.&G230MB&2276&600.0\\

681: o8gm33020&52776.4&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2135&300.0\\

682: o8gm33060&52776.4&52x0.1&+38.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

683: o8gm33090&52776.5&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&3115&300.0\\

684: o8gm330e0&52776.5&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2416&320.0\\

685: o8gm330i0&52776.5&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2976&320.0\\

686: o8gm330n0&52776.5&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2276&300.0\\

687: o8gm32050&52776.6&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

688: o8gm320h0&52778.6&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2557&400.0\\

689: o8gm320l0&52778.7&52x0.1&+38.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

690: o8gm320m0&52778.7&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

691: o8gm320p0&52778.7&52x0.1&+38.&G430M&3423&90.0\\

692: o8gm320x0&52778.7&52x0.1&+38.&G230MB&1995&300.0\\

693: o8gm52050&52791.7&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

694: o8gm520h0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2557&400.0\\

695: o8gm520l0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

696: o8gm520m0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

697: o8gm520p0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62.&G430M&3680&90.0\\

698: o8gm520x0&52791.8&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&1995&300.0\\

699: o8gm52100&52791.9&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2135&400.0\\

700: o8gm52170&52791.9&52x0.1&+62.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

701: o8gm52180&52791.9&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&3115&300.0\\

702: o8gm521f0&52791.9&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2416&320.0\\

703: o8gm521j0&52791.9&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2976&340.0\\

704: o8gm521o0&52792.0&52x0.1&+62.&G230MB&2276&300.0\\

705: o8gm63040&52812.1&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2416&350.0\\

706: o8gm63080&52812.2&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2976&320.0\\

707: o8gm630d0&52812.2&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

708: o8gm62050&52813.7&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

709: o8gm620h0&52814.0&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2557&400.0\\

710: o8gm620l0&52814.1&52x0.1&+70.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

711: o8gm620m0&52814.1&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

712: o8gm620p0&52814.1&52x0.1&+70.&G430M&3423&90.0\\

713: o8gm620x0&52814.2&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&1995&300.0\\

714: o8gm62100&52814.2&52x0.1&+70.&G230MB&2135&300.0\\

715: o8gm62140&52814.2&52x0.1&+70.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

716: o8ma82060&52851.9&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

717: o8ma820i0&52852.0&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2557&400.0\\

718: o8ma820m0&52852.1&52x0.1&+105.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

719: o8ma820n0&52852.1&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

720: o8ma820q0&52852.1&52x0.1&+105.&G430M&2697&90.0\\

721: o8ma820y0&52852.2&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&1995&300.0\\

722: o8ma82110&52852.2&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2135&300.0\\

723: o8ma821a0&52852.3&52x0.1&+105.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

724: o8ma821b0&52852.3&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2416&320.0\\

725: o8ma821i0&52852.4&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2976&300.0\\

726: o8ma821m0&52852.4&52x0.1&+105.&G230MB&2276&300.0\\

727: o8ma92040&52940.3&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2836&300.0\\

728: o8ma920a0&52940.3&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2557&800.0\\

729: o8ma920c0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G430M&3680&52.0\\

730: o8ma920d0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2697&340.0\\

731: o8ma920e0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G430M&3423&90.0\\

732: o8ma920i0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&1995&600.0\\

733: o8ma920m0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2135&600.0\\

734: o8ma920o0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G430M&3350&90.0\\

735: o8ma920p0&52940.4&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&3115&300.0\\

736: o8ma920s0&52940.5&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2416&600.0\\

737: o8ma920u0&52940.5&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2976&340.0\\

738: o8ma920x0&52940.5&52x0.1&+153.&G230MB&2276&300.0\\

739: o8ma94020&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G230MB&2836&320.0\\

740: o8ma94070&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G230MB&2557&410.0\\

741: o8ma94090&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G430M&2557&52.0\\

742: o8ma940a0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G430M&3423&90.0\\

743: o8ma940e0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G230MB&2697&323.0\\

744: o8ma940h0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G430M&3165&90.0\\

745: o8ma940i0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G230MB&2135&320.0\\

746: o8ma940m0&53071.3&52x0.1&-28.&G230MB&2416&450.0\\

747: \enddata

748: \tablenotetext{a}{The slit angel is measured from north through east.

749:   All slits are peaked up on the central star.} 

750: \end{deluxetable}

751: 

752: \begin{deluxetable}{lllrrr}

753: \tablewidth{0pt}

754: \tabletypesize{\small}

755: \tablecolumns{6}

756: \tablecaption{Measured Properties of 6307\mbox{\AA}\label{tab6307}}

757: \tablehead{&&&&\colhead{Line

758:     Flux\tablenotemark{a}}&\colhead{Line EW\tablenotemark{a}}\\

759: \colhead{MJD}&\colhead{Year}&\colhead{Telescope}&\colhead{Centroid (\mbox{\AA})}&\colhead{(erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)$\times 10^{-13}$}&\colhead{(\mbox{\AA})}}

760: \startdata

761: 50891.7&1998.21&HST/STIS&\nodata&2.98$\pm$1.52&-0.01$\pm$0.05\tablenotemark{b}\\

762: 51230.6&1999.14&HST/STIS&6306.88$\pm$0.19&9.77$\pm$2.66&0.19$\pm$0.05\\

763: 51533.3&1999.97&VLT/UVES&6306.80$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.19$\pm$0.05\tablenotemark{b}\\

764: 51623.9&2000.22&HST/STIS&6306.95$\pm$0.19&8.89$\pm$1.36&0.19$\pm$0.03\\

765: 52016.8&2001.29&HST/STIS&6307.32$\pm$0.19&22.62$\pm$1.63&0.39$\pm$0.03\\

766: 52294.1&2002.05&HST/STIS&6306.90$\pm$0.19&14.91$\pm$1.78&0.26$\pm$0.03\\

767: 52459.7&2002.51&HST/STIS&6306.75$\pm$0.19&14.92$\pm$3.20&0.24$\pm$0.05\\

768: 52615.3&2002.93&VLT/UVES&6306.50$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.20$\pm$0.06\\

769: 52620.3&2002.95&VLT/UVES&6306.69$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.24$\pm$0.05\\

770: 52682.9&2003.12&HST/STIS&6306.75$\pm$0.19&7.62$\pm$2.56&0.14$\pm$0.05\\

771: 52684.6&2003.12&VLT/UVES&6306.41$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.14$\pm$0.05\\

772: 52776.6&2003.24&HST/STIS&\nodata&1.79$\pm$3.56&0.03$\pm$0.06\\

773: 52788.6&2003.40&VLT/UVES&\nodata&\nodata&0.05$\pm$0.06\\

774: 52792.0&2003.42&HST/STIS&\nodata&4.65$\pm$2.46&0.07$\pm$0.04\\

775: 52794.5&2003.42&VLT/UVES&\nodata&\nodata&-0.01$\pm$0.04\\

776: 52812.2&2003.47&HST/STIS&\nodata&3.61$\pm$2.98&0.05$\pm$0.04\\

777: 52825.5&2003.51&VLT/UVES&\nodata&\nodata&-0.07$\pm$0.05\\

778: 52852.0&2003.58&HST/STIS&\nodata&-1.90$\pm$2.87&-0.03$\pm$0.04\\

779: 52904.5&2003.72&HST/STIS&\nodata&-2.19$\pm$3.60&-0.03$\pm$0.04\\

780: 53055.6&2004.14&VLT/UVES&\nodata&\nodata&0.05$\pm$0.04\\

781: 53071.3&2004.18&HST/STIS&\nodata&5.41$\pm$3.22&0.06$\pm$0.03\\

782: 53413.4&2005.12&VLT/UVES&6306.99$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.44$\pm$0.06\\

783: 53448.1&2005.21&VLT/UVES&6306.93$\pm$0.08&\nodata&0.39$\pm$0.04\\

784: \enddata

785: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes and equivalent widths are expressed relative

786:   to the continuum with values greater than zero denoting excess flux

787:   above the continuum.  Only the STIS/CCD data is absolute flux calibrated.}

788: \tablenotetext{b}{The wing of \ion{Fe}{2} $\lambda$ 6319 was brighter than 

789:   normal at this time so that it interfered with the measurement of

790:   the equivalent width of the feature.}

791: \end{deluxetable}

792: 

793: \end{document}

794: 

795: