1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The command below calls the preprint style
10: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
11: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
12: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
13: %%
14: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
15:
16: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
17:
18: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
19:
20: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
23:
24: \documentclass[apj,numberedappendix]{emulateapj}
25:
26: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
27: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
28: %% use the longabstract style option.
29:
30: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
31:
32: \newcommand{\Ms}{\mathrm{M_\odot}} %Solar masses
33: \newcommand{\cm}{\mathrm{cm^2}} %cm^2
34: \newcommand{\s}{\mathrm{s}} %s
35: \newcommand{\ergcms}{\mathrm{erg/cm^2/s}} %erg/cm^2/s
36: \newcommand{\keV}{\mathrm{keV}} %keV
37: \newcommand{\MeV}{\mathrm{MeV}} %MeV
38:
39: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\mathrm{Mpc}} %Mpc
40: \newcommand{\kpc}{\mathrm{kpc}} %kpc
41: \newcommand{\kmsMpc}{\mathrm{km/s/Mpc}} %km/s/Mpc
42:
43: \newcommand\FIXME[1]{\par\noindent
44: % \begin{tabular}{|p{\textwidth}|}
45: \begin{tabular}{|p{7cm}|}
46: \hline
47: \textbf{FIXME:} #1\\
48: \hline
49: \end{tabular}}
50:
51: %Reference to an equation
52: \newcommand\eqnref[1]{%
53: eq.~\ref{eqn:#1}}
54:
55: \newcommand\tabref[1]{%
56: \tablename~\ref{tab:#1}}
57:
58: \newcommand\figref[1]{%
59: \figurename ~\ref{fig:#1}}
60:
61: \newcommand\secref[1]{%
62: Section ~\ref{sec:#1}}
63:
64: {
65: \def \today {March 24, 2006}
66: }
67:
68: \shorttitle{Sterile neutrinos in the Milky Way}
69: \shortauthors{Riemer--S{\o}rensen et al.}
70: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJL}
71:
72: \begin{document}
73:
74: \title{Sterile neutrinos in the Milky Way: \\
75: Observational constraints}
76:
77: \author{Signe Riemer-S{\o}rensen$^1$,
78: Steen H. Hansen$^2$, and Kristian Pedersen$^1$}
79:
80: \affil{$^1$ Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark\\
81: $^2$ University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190,
82: 8057 Zurich, Switzerland}
83: %\email{}
84:
85:
86: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
87: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
88: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
89: %% affiliation.
90:
91: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
92: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
93: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
94: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
95: %% editorial office after submission.
96:
97: \begin{abstract}
98: We consider the possibility of constraining decaying dark matter by
99: looking out through the Milky Way halo. Specifically we use {\it Chandra}
100: blank sky observations to constrain the parameter space of sterile neutrinos.
101: We find that a broad band in parameter space is still open, leaving
102: the sterile neutrino as an excellent dark matter candidate.
103: \end{abstract}
104:
105: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
106: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
107: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
108: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
109:
110: \keywords{dark matter --- elementary particles --- neutrinos ---
111: X-rays: diffuse background}
112:
113: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
114: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
115: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
116: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
117: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
118: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
119: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
120: %% each reference.
121:
122:
123: \section{INTRODUCTION}
124: The particle nature of the dark matter remains a mystery. This is
125: contrasted with the firmly established dark matter abundance, which
126: has been measured using the cosmic microwave background and
127: large scale structure observations~\citep{spergel,uros}.
128:
129: A wide range of dark matter particle candidates have been proposed,
130: including axions, the lightest supersymmetric particle, and sterile
131: neutrinos. Recently, sterile neutrinos have gained renewed
132: interest, since theoretical considerations have shown them to be
133: a natural part of a minimally extended standard model, the
134: $\nu$MSM. This $\nu$MSM, which is the standard model extended with only 3
135: sterile neutrinos, manages to explain the masses of the active
136: neutrinos~\citep{asaka0503065}, the baryon asymmetry of the
137: universe~\citep{asaka0505013}, and the abundance of dark
138: matter~\citep{dodelson}.
139:
140: Arguably, one of the most appealing aspects of sterile neutrinos as
141: dark matter candidates is, that they will very likely either be detected or rejected during the next couple of years. This is because the sterile neutrinos
142: decay virtually at rest into a photon and an active neutrino
143: producing a sharp decay line at $E=m_s/2$ where $m_s$ is the mass of the sterile neutrinos~\citep{warm}. This photon line
144: can now be searched for in cosmic high energy data of the background
145: radiation (for recent studies see \citet{mapelli,boyarsky}),
146: towards massive structures like galaxy clusters~\citep{tucker,boyarsky06},
147: or towards dark matter structures with a very low fraction of
148: baryons~\citep{hansen02}.
149:
150: The sterile neutrino was originally introduced in order to alleviate
151: discrepancies between the theory of cold dark matter structure formation and
152: observations~\citep{dodelson,warm}, which indicated that the dark
153: matter particle should be warm. Traditionally ``warm'' means that the
154: mass of the dark matter particle should be in the keV range, in order
155: to suppress the formation of small scale structures. While some of these
156: problems have found other solutions, sterile neutrinos have
157: found other uses, including an explanation for the pulsar peculiar
158: velocities~\citep{kusenko,fuller}, synthesising early star
159: formation~\citep{biermann}, and, as mentioned above, as an explanation
160: for the masses of the active neutrinos and the baryon
161: asymmetry~\citep{asaka0503065,asaka0505013}.
162: Also constraints on doube $\beta$ decays have been derived
163: \citep{beruzkov}.
164:
165: We will here follow the idea of~\citet{hansen02} and look for a decay
166: line towards a region with very little baryons. Specifically we will
167: study X-ray ``blank'' regions in the sky with no known X-ray sources.
168: By doing so we will search for a signal from the dark matter halo of
169: our own Galaxy. We will see that the signal is very low
170: for photons with energies of the order 0.1--10~keV, which
171: allows us to exclude part of the sterile neutrino parameter space.
172:
173:
174: \begin{figure}[htb]
175: \centering
176: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.49\textwidth]{./spectra_gauss.eps}
177: \caption{The blank sky ACIS-S3 spectrum -- i.e.\ a view through
178: the Milky Way halo. Also shown is the maximal single gaussian
179: emission line from decaying dark matter at a specific energy as discussed in \secref{analysis}.}
180: \label{fig:gaussian}
181: \end{figure}
182:
183:
184: \section{X-RAY DATA ANALYSIS} \label{sec:analysis}
185: We have analysed a 0.3--9~keV spectrum extracted from many combined
186: {\it Chandra} ACIS-S3
187: blank sky observations\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/contrib/maxim}
188: (shown in \figref{gaussian}) with
189: CIAO 3.3\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao}, and fitted spectral models
190: with the spectral fitting package Xspec \citep{xspec}.
191:
192:
193:
194:
195: The line features at 1.74~keV, 2.1--2.2~keV, and 7.48~keV are
196: Si~$K\alpha$, the Au~$M\alpha\beta$ complex, and Ni~$K\alpha$ respectively,
197: originating from fluorescence of material in the telescope and focal plane
198: (i.e.\ they are seen in spectra obtained when ACIS-S3 is stowed and
199: not pointing at the sky\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/html/node1.html}). However, a decay line from dark matter could ``hide''
200: under these prominent lines. In this case the decay line should be
201: redshifted by a factor of $1+z$ where $z$ is the redshift of the dark matter
202: emitter. Dark matter concentrations located at different distances should thus
203: give rise to lines at different observed energies. In order to test for this,
204: we extracted spectra from ACIS-S3 data of two galaxy clusters, A383 and
205: A478, at redshifts, $z=0.1883$ and $0.0881$, respectively.
206: We optimized the ratio between expected dark matter signal and emission
207: from hot intracluster gas by extracting spectra from the cluster outskirts.
208: The X-ray emission from hot intracluster gas
209: is proportional to the gas density squared, whereas the emission of
210: photons from dark matter is directly proportional to the dark matter
211: density. Hence, in the cluster outskirts the gas surface brightness
212: falls off with projected cluster-centric distance, $b$ as,
213: $S_{gas} \propto b^{-3}$ (assuming a typical $\beta$-model) whereas the dark matter surface brightness is expected to
214: fall off as $S_{DM} \propto b^{-1}$ (assuming an isothermal sphere). Specifically, we have extracted
215: spectra from an outer radial bin, defined by optimizing the ratio of
216: matter in the field of view (proportional to the signal from decaying
217: dark matter) to the X-ray emission from the intracluster gas (``noise'')
218: described by a $\beta$-profile. The outer radius was chosen as the radius
219: with the optimal ratio (which is very close to the edge of the ACIS-S3 chip)
220: and the inner radius was chosen so the signal to noise ratio had a value
221: of half the optimal value.
222: No obvious line features was detected at the corresponding redshifted
223: energies\footnote{After finisihing this analysis a related paper
224: appeared~\citep{boyarsky06} where an analysis using exactly this method of
225: looking at the outer cluster region was made.}.
226:
227: We then proceeded to firmly constrain the flux from any dark matter
228: decay line in the full energy interval spanned by the blank sky spectrum.
229: The blank sky spectrum was well fitted (reduced $\chi ^2 = 1.1$ for 540
230: d.o.f.) by a composite model consisting of an exponential plus a power
231: law plus four gaussians for the most prominent lines.
232: A hypothetical mono-energetic emission line in the spectrum was
233: represented by a gaussian, centered at the line energy, and with a
234: width, $\sigma$, given by the instrument spectral resolution:
235: $\sigma \approx 0.1$~keV for $0.3\, \keV
236: \leq E < 6.0$~keV and $\sigma \approx 0.15$~keV for
237: $6.0\, \keV \leq E < 8.0$~keV\footnote{http://acis.mit.edu/acis/spect/spect.html}.
238: (The velocity of the halo dark matter is producing negligible line
239: broadening, $v/c \sim 10^{-3}-10^{-4}$).
240: For each energy in steps of 0.05~keV, we defined a gaussian with the
241: instrumental width and maximum at the model value of the fit to the
242: broad-band spectrum. The flux of this gaussian was then calculated
243: providing an upper limit of emission from decaying dark
244: matter at the given energy. This is a model independent and very
245: conservative analysis,
246: since any X-ray emitters within the field of view, and background,
247: contributes to the extracted spectrum. If we instead only allowed the
248: decay signal from potential decaying dark matter to
249: produce a bump above the ``base line'' spectrum, then we could improve the
250: bounds by a large factor~\citep{boyarsky}. However, this approach would
251: depend sensitively on the robustness of modelling background and
252: emissions from sources contributing to the ``base line'' spectrum.
253:
254:
255: \section{DECAY RATE OF STERILE NEUTRINOS IN THE MILKY WAY HALO}
256: The amount of dark matter from our Galaxy within the observed field of
257: view is only a minute fraction of the total mass of the halo.
258: We use the model for the Milky Way presented in~\citet{klypin}, namely
259: an NFW dark matter profile with
260: $M_{vir} = 10^{12} M_\sun$,
261: virial radius $r_{vir} = 258$ kpc,
262: concentration $c=12$,
263: and solar distance $R_\sun=8$ kpc. We then integrate out through
264: the Milky Way halo to find the expected signal. Changing the details of
265: this model does not significantly affrect our results (e.g.\ changing the
266: inner density slope between $-1$ and zero,
267: or changing the outer slope between $-3$ and $-4$, changes the predicted
268: signal by less than a factor of 2).
269: There is also an uncertainty, possibly as large as a factor of 2,
270: arising from using the value of
271: $M_{vir} = 10^{12} M_\sun$.
272:
273: The blank sky spectrum was extracted from the full angular opening of
274: the {\it Chandra} ACIS-S3 chip which is $8.4 \arcmin$ corresponding to a mass within the field of view of
275: $M_{fov}=1.5\times10^{-7}M_{vir}$ at a mean luminosity
276: distance of $D_L = 35$~kpc, derived from the model mentioned above.
277:
278: The luminosity from decaying sterile neutrinos is
279: $\mathcal{L}=E_{\gamma} N \Gamma _{\gamma}$, where $E_{\gamma}$ is the
280: energy of the photons, $N$ is the number of sterile neutrinos
281: particles in the field of
282: view ($N = M_{fov}/m_s$) and $\Gamma _{\gamma}$ is the decay rate.
283: The flux at a luminosity distance, $D_L$, is:
284: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:flux}
285: F = \frac{\mathcal{L}}{4 \pi D_L^2}=
286: \frac{E_{\gamma} N \Gamma _{\gamma}}{4\pi D_L^2} \, .
287: \end{equation}
288: The observed flux, $F$, at a given energy ($E_{\gamma}=m_s/2$) yields
289: a conservative upper limit on the flux from decaying sterile neutrinos, so
290: \eqnref{flux} can be
291: rewritten as:
292: \begin{equation} \label{eqn:maxdecay}
293: \Gamma _{\gamma} \leq \frac{8 \pi F D_L^2}{M_{fov}} \, .
294: %\approx 1.34\times10^{-4}\s^-1 \left(\frac{F}{\ergcms}\right) \left(\frac{D_L}{\Mpc}\right)^2 \left(\frac{M_{fov}}{\Ms}\right)^{-1} \, .
295: \end{equation}
296:
297: From the blank sky flux, an upper limit on the decay rate has been
298: derived as function of line energy and plotted in
299: \figref{decayrate}.
300:
301: \begin{figure}[htb]
302: \centering
303: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{./decayrate.eps}
304: \caption{The decay rate as function of photon energy. The
305: solid line is the upper limit from the {\it Chandra} blank sky
306: observations viewing out through the Milky Way halo.}
307: \label{fig:decayrate}
308: \end{figure}
309:
310:
311: \section{CONFRONTING THE MODEL WITH DATA}
312:
313: The neutrinos can decay via various channels, and
314: the lifetime of the sterile neutrinos is given by \citep{barger:1995,heavy}:
315: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:tau}
316: \tau = \frac{1}{\Gamma _{tot}}=\frac{f(m_s)\times 10^{20}}{\left( m_s/\keV \right)^5 \sin^2(2\theta)} \, ,
317: \end{equation}
318: $\sin^2(2\theta)$ is the mixing angle with the active neutrino,
319: and $f(m_s)$ takes into account the open decay channels so
320: that for $m_s < 1 \MeV$, where only the neutrino channel is open,
321: $f(m_s)=0.86$.
322:
323: The mixing angle is given by \citep[][eqs.~209,~210]{dolgov:2002}:
324: \begin{eqnarray}
325: \sin ^2 (2\theta) &\approx& A \left( \frac{\keV}{m_s} \right)^2
326: \left( \frac{\Omega
327: _{DM}}{0.3} \right)\left( \frac{h}{0.65} \right)^2 \nonumber \\
328: && S \left( \frac{g_*(T_{produced})}{10.75} \right)^{3/2} \, ,
329: \label{eqn:sin}
330: \end{eqnarray}
331: where $g_*(T_{produced})$ is the number of relativistic degrees of
332: freedom at the temperature at which the sterile neutrinos are
333: produced. For neutrino masses of $m_s \approx$ keV, the neutrinos are
334: produced near the QCD phase transition~\citep{dodelson}, making the
335: distribution somewhat non-thermal~\citep{warm}. The value of $g_*$
336: for such neutrinos is very conservatively considered to be
337: between 10.75 and 20, depending on the details of the QCD phase
338: transition. We will here use $g_*(T_{produced})=15$ as a reference value.
339: A numerical calculation including the details of the QCD
340: phase-transition~\citep{kev06} has confirmed that the choice $g_*=15$
341: gives good agreement with the analytical results presented by
342: \citet{dolgov:2002}. S is a free parameter taking into account that
343: additional entropy may be produced after the sterile neutrinos have been
344: created~\citep{asaka06}. This parameter was suggested to be in the
345: range between 1 and 100~\citep{asaka06}. $A$ is a constant depending
346: on which active neutrino the sterile neutrinos are assumed to mix
347: with. It takes the values $A_{se}=6.7\times 10^{-8}$ for $\nu _s$
348: mixing with $\nu _e$ and $A_{s\mu}=4.8\times 10^{-8}$ for $\nu _{\mu,
349: \tau}$. The sterile neutrinos are assumed to account for all dark matter,
350: i.e.\ $\Omega _{DM}=0.30$, and the Hubble parameter
351: at the present time, $H_0$, given as $h=H_0/(100\kmsMpc)$.
352:
353: \citet{barger:1995} derived the branching ratio for the radiative decay,
354: $\nu_s \rightarrow \nu_\alpha + \gamma$,
355: to be $\Gamma _{\gamma}/\Gamma _{tot} = (27\alpha)/(8\pi) \approx 1/128$.
356: Now the lifetime can be rewritten as:
357: \begin{eqnarray}
358: \tau &=& \left(\frac{E}{\keV} \right)^{-3} \left(\frac{g_*}{15}
359: \right)^{-3/2} \left(\frac{\Omega _{DM}}{0.3} \right)^{-1}
360: \left(\frac{h}{0.7} \right)^{-2} \nonumber \\
361: && \times \, \frac{f(m_s) 6.5\times10^{18} sec}{A S} \, .
362: \end{eqnarray}
363: An upper limit on the decay rate is constrained from \eqnref{maxdecay} and
364: \begin{equation}
365: \tau = \frac{1}{\Gamma _{tot}} \approx \frac{1}{128 \Gamma _\gamma} \, .
366: \end{equation}
367: The lower limit on the lifetime from the data and the model predictions
368: are plotted in \figref{lifetime} for various values of $S$ and $g_*$.
369:
370:
371: We see from \figref{lifetime} that the blank sky data (solid
372: red line) is at least one order of magnitude less restrictive than
373: the simplest sterile model predictions (hatched region). Models with
374: significant entropy production, $S \approx 30$, are excluded in the
375: mass range $4.2\, \keV < m < 7 \keV$. For $S>100$ we exclude $2\, \keV
376: < m < 16 \keV$.
377:
378: These constraints are more restrictive than the ones obtained
379: for the Coma cluster periphery \citep{boyarsky06} for masses less than
380: approximately $8$ keV.
381:
382: \begin{figure}[htb]
383: \centering
384: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{./lifetime_gaussian.eps}
385: \caption{The lifetime constrained from the flux of the {\it Chandra}
386: blank sky data (red) and A383 (green). The $\nu$MSM prediction for
387: $S=1$ and $g_*=10-20$ (hatched) and several variations of $S$
388: and $g_*$ (black) have been overplotted.}
389: \label{fig:lifetime}
390: \end{figure}
391:
392:
393: \section{OTHER CONSTRAINTS}
394: The simplest models with $S=1$ are bounded from below, $m_s>2\, \keV$,
395: using Ly$\alpha$ observations
396: \citep{viel}, and possibly even
397: $m_s>14$~keV according to a recent analysis~\citep{seljak}.
398: These constraints are weakned when allowing for $S>1$~\citep{asaka06},
399: since additional entropy dilutes the momentum of the sterile neutrinos.
400:
401:
402: Upper limits on the sterile neutrino mass are derived from the flux of the
403: diffuse photon background~\citep{warm}, and are of the order $m_s<15$~keV
404: for $S=1$ \citep{mapelli,boyarsky}. These bounds are strengthened
405: for $S>1$, since the sterile neutrinos then will decay faster.
406:
407: A strict lower bound on the sterile neutrino mass arises since Big Bang
408: nucleosynthesis only allows approximately $0.3$ additional relativistic
409: neutrino species to be populated at $\sim$~MeV temperatures.
410: This lower bound is approximately $m_s>50$~eV. The Tremaine-Gunn bound
411: applied to dwarf speroidals give $m_s>0.5$ keV \citep{tremaine,lin}.
412:
413: The strong claim of an upper mass limit presented in \cite{tucker},
414: under-estimated the flux from Virgo cluster by 2 orders of magnitude,
415: and is unreliable \citep{boyarsky06}.
416:
417: Comparing these existing bounds with our findings, we conclude that a
418: broad band in neutrino parameter space is still open as shown in
419: \figref{m_S}. Taking the results of \cite{seljak} into account, then only
420: masses above approximately $5$ keV are allowed. Ignoring
421: the results of \cite{seljak}, then another band opens in parameter
422: space, for small masses and large entropy production.
423:
424: \begin{figure}[htb]
425: \centering
426: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{./m_S.eps}
427: \caption{The $m_s-S$ parameter space with constraints from
428: the {\it Chandra} blank sky data (red, fat, diagonal, this paper),
429: Ly-$\alpha$ observations
430: (blue, diagonal, conservative~\cite{viel},
431: and green, vertical, ambitious~\cite{seljak}),
432: Tremaine-Gunn bound $m>0.5$ keV (black, horizontal). }
433: \label{fig:m_S}
434: \end{figure}
435:
436:
437:
438: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
439: We have used {\it {Chandra}} blank sky observations, i.e.\ viewing out
440: through the Milky Way halo, to search for a possible decay line from
441: dark matter particles. No obvious decay line was identified.
442:
443: The blank sky 0.3--9~keV X-ray flux is used to constrain the parameter
444: space of sterile neutrinos, predicted to decay at rest to a detectable photon
445: and an active neutrino. We find that the entropy production must
446: be limited, $S<100$ for the mass range, $2\, \keV < m_s < 16$~keV,
447: and even $S<10$ for masses near $m_s=10$ keV.
448:
449: This leaves a wide allowed space in parameter space, and the sterile
450: neutrino is therefore still a viable dark matter candidate. If all
451: Ly$\alpha$ constraints are considered, then it appears that the
452: sterile neutrino is either rather massive, or its momenta are diluted
453: by the entropy production, rendering it a cold dark matter candidate.
454: If some of the Ly$\alpha$ constraints are relaxed, then there is a
455: broad allowed band for smaller masses where the sterile neutrino is
456: still a warm dark matter candidate.
457:
458: Our analysis is conservative and assumes that the entire blank sky signal
459: at a given energy is arising from a decaying neutrino. By looking for
460: decay lines above the expected blank sky emission, the results obtained
461: here may be improved significantly.
462:
463:
464: \acknowledgments SHH is pleased to thank Ben Moore for inspiring
465: discussions.
466: We thank Alex Kusenko for useful comments.
467: The Dark Cosmology Centre is funded by the Danish
468: National Research Foundation.
469: SHH is supported by the Swiss National Foundation.
470: This research has made use of data
471: obtained through the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research
472: Center Online Service, provided by the NASA/Goddard Space Flight
473: Center.\\
474:
475: {\em Note added:}\\
476: After finishing this paper we became aware of an independent analysis,
477: where the possibility of measuring decaying dark matter particles from our
478: Galaxy, using the blank sky observations with {\it XMM-Newton}, was considered
479: \citep{bnrst2006}. The conclusions reached in that paper are qualitatively
480: similar to ours.\\
481:
482:
483: Facilities: \facility{Chandra(ACIS)}
484:
485:
486: \begin{thebibliography}{}
487:
488: \bibitem[Abazajian(2005)]{kev06}
489: Abazajian, K., 2005,
490: astro-ph/0511630
491:
492:
493: \bibitem[Abazajian, Fuller \& Tucker(2004)]{tucker}
494: Abazajian, K., Fuller G.~M. \& Tucker, W.~H. 2001,
495: %``Direct detection of warm dark matter in the X-ray,''
496: Astrophys.\ J., 562, 593
497: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0106002].
498: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0106002;%%
499:
500: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{xspec}Arnaud, K.A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101:
501: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 17
502:
503: \bibitem[Asaka, Blanchet \& Shaposhnikov(2005)]{asaka0503065}
504: Asaka, T. Blanchet, S. \& Shaposhnikov, M. 2005,
505: %``The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses,''
506: Phys.\ Lett.\ B631, 151
507: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0503065].
508: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503065;%%
509:
510: \bibitem[Asaka \& Shaposhnikov(2005)]{asaka0505013}
511: Asaka, T. \& Shaposhnikov, M. 2005,
512: %``The nuMSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe,''
513: Phys.\ Lett., B620, 17
514: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0505013].
515: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505013;%%
516:
517: \bibitem[Asaka, Kusenko \& Shaposhnikov(2006)]{asaka06}
518: Asaka, T., Kusenko, A. \& Shaposhnikov, M. 2006,
519: %``Opening a new window for warm dark matter,''
520: arXiv:hep-ph/0602150
521: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602150;%%
522:
523:
524: \bibitem[Barger, Phillips \& Sarkar(1995)]{barger:1995}
525: Barger, V. D., Phillips, R. J. N., Sarkar, S 1995,
526: Phys. Lett. B, 352, 365
527: %%(hep-ph/9503295)
528:
529: \bibitem[Beruzkov(2005)]{beruzkov}
530: Bezrukov, F. 2005,
531: %``nuMSM predictions for neutrinoless double beta decay,''
532: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 72, 071303
533: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0505247].
534: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505247;%%
535:
536: \bibitem[Biermann \& Kusenko(2006)]{biermann}
537: Biermann, P.~L. \& Kusenko, A. 2006,
538: %``Relic keV sterile neutrinos and reionization,''
539: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett., 96, 091301
540: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0601004].
541: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0601004;%%
542:
543:
544: \bibitem[Boyarsky et al.(2005)]{boyarsky}
545: Boyarsky, A., Neronov, A., Ruchayskiy, O. \& Shaposhnikov, M. 2005
546: %``Constraints on sterile neutrino as a dark matter candidate from the diffuse
547: %X-ray background,''
548: arXiv:astro-ph/0512509.
549: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0512509;%%
550:
551: \bibitem[Boyarsky et al.(2006)]{boyarsky06}
552: Boyarsky, A., Neronov, A., Ruchayskiy, O. \& Shaposhnikov, M. 2006,
553: %``Restrictions on parameters of sterile neutrino dark matter from
554: %observations of galaxy clusters,''
555: arXiv:astro-ph/0603368.
556: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603368;%%
557:
558: \bibitem[Boyarsky et al(2006)]{bnrst2006}
559: Boyarsky A., Neronov A., Ruchayskiy O., Shaposhnikov M. \&
560: Tkachev I. 2006, astro-ph/0603660
561:
562:
563: \bibitem[Dodelson \& Widrow(1994)]{dodelson}
564: Dodelson S. \& Widrow L.~M. 1994,
565: %``Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter,''
566: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 72, 17
567: [arXiv:hep-ph/9303287].
568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9303287;%%
569:
570: \bibitem[Dolgov et al.(2000)]{heavy}
571: Dolgov, A.~D., Hansen, S.~H., Raffelt, G. \& Semikoz, D.~V. 2000,
572: %``Heavy sterile neutrinos: Bounds from big-bang nucleosynthesis and SN
573: %1987A,''
574: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B590, 562
575: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0008138].
576: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008138;%%
577:
578: \bibitem[Dolgov \& Hansen(2002)]{warm}
579: Dolgov, A.~D. \& Hansen, S.~H. 2002
580: %``Massive sterile neutrinos as warm dark matter,''
581: Astropart.\ Phys., 16, 339
582: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0009083].
583: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009083;%%
584:
585: \bibitem[Dolgov(2002)]{dolgov:2002}
586: Dolgov, A.D. 2002,
587: %``Neutrinos in cosmology,''
588: Phys.\ Rept. 370, 333
589: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0202122].
590: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202122;%%
591:
592: \bibitem[Fuller et al.(2003)]{fuller}
593: Fuller G.~M., Kusenko A., Mocioiu I. \& Pascoli S. 2003,
594: %``Pulsar kicks from a dark-matter sterile neutrino,''
595: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 68, 103002
596: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0307267].
597: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0307267;%%
598:
599:
600: \bibitem[Hansen et al.(2002)]{hansen02}
601: Hansen S.~H., Lesgourgues, J., Pastor, S. \& Silk, J. 2002
602: %``Closing the window on warm dark matter,''
603: MNRAS, 333, 544
604: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0106108].
605: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0106108;%%
606:
607: \bibitem[Klypin, Zhao \& Somerville(2002)]{klypin}
608: Klypin, A., Zhao, H. \& Somerville, R.~S. 2002,
609: %``LCDM-based models for the Milky Way and M31 I: Dynamical Models,''
610: ApJ, 573, 597
611: %arXiv:astro-ph/0110390.
612: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0110390;%%
613:
614: \bibitem[Kusenko \& Segre(1997)]{kusenko}
615: Kusenko, A. \& Segre, Y. 1997,
616: %``Neutral current induced neutrino oscillations in a supernova,''
617: Phys.\ Lett.\ B396, 197
618: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9701311].
619: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701311;%%
620:
621:
622: \bibitem[Lin \& Faber(1983)]{lin}
623: Lin D.~N.~C. \& Faber S.~M. 1983,
624: %``Some Implications Of Nonluminous Matter In Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies,''
625: Astrophys.\ J. 266, L21
626: %%CITATION = ASJOA,266,L21;%%
627:
628: \bibitem[Mapelli \& Ferrara(2005)]{mapelli}
629: Mapelli, M. \& Ferrara, A. 2005,
630: %``Background radiation from sterile neutrino decay and reionization,''
631: MNRAS, 364, 2
632: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0508413].
633: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0508413;%%
634:
635:
636: \bibitem[Seljak et al.(2005)]{uros}
637: Seljak, U. et al. 2005,
638: %``Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy
639: %bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass,
640: %and dark energy,''
641: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 71, 103515
642: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0407372].
643: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0407372;%%
644:
645:
646: \bibitem[Seljak et al.(2006)]{seljak}
647: Seljak, U. 2006,
648: %A.~Makarov, P.~McDonald and H.~Trac,
649: %``Can sterile neutrinos be the dark matter?,''
650: arXiv:astro-ph/0602430
651: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0602430;%%
652:
653: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2006)]{spergel}
654: Spergel, D.~N. et al. 2003,
655: astro-ph/0603449
656:
657: \bibitem[Tremaine \& Gunn(1979)]{tremaine}
658: Tremaine S. \& Gunn J.~E. 1979,
659: %``Dynamical Role Of Light Neutral Leptons In Cosmology,''
660: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 42, 407
661: %%CITATION = PRLTA,42,407;%%
662:
663: \bibitem[Viel et al.(2005)]{viel}
664: Viel, M. 2005,
665: %J.~Lesgourgues, M.~G.~Haehnelt, S.~Matarrese and A.~Riotto,
666: %``Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and
667: %light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman-alpha forest,''
668: Phys.\ Rev.\ D 71, 063534
669: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0501562].
670: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0501562;%%
671:
672: %\cite{Vikhlinin:2005mp}
673: \bibitem[Vikhlinin et al.(2005)]{vikhlinin}
674: Vikhlinin A. et al. 2005,
675: %A.~Kravtsov, W.~Forman, C.~Jones, M.~Markevitch, S.~S.~Murray and L.~Van Speybroeck,
676: %``Chandra sample of nearby relaxed galaxy clusters: mass, gas fraction, and
677: %mass-temperature relation,''
678: Astrophys.\ J. 640, 691
679: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0507092].
680: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0507092;%%
681:
682:
683:
684:
685: \end{thebibliography}
686:
687: \end{document}
688:
689:
690:
691:
692:
693: