1: \documentclass[]{aa}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{natbib}
4:
5: \newcommand{\Teff}{\hbox{$T\sb{\rm eff}$}}
6: \newcommand{\logg}{\hbox{$\log g$}}
7: \newcommand{\Msun}{\hbox{M$\sb{\odot}$}}
8: \newcommand{\Rsun}{\hbox{R$\sb{\odot}$}}
9: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\hbox{L$\sb{\odot}$}}
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{New DQ white dwarfs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR4:
15: confirmation of two sequences}
16:
17: \author{D. Koester
18: \and
19: S. Knist
20: }
21: \institute{ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik,
22: University of Kiel, {D-24098 Kiel}, Germany
23: }
24:
25: \offprints{D. Koester\\ \email{koester@astrophysik.uni-kiel.de}}
26:
27:
28: \date{}
29:
30: \authorrunning{D. Koester \& S.Knist}
31:
32: \titlerunning{New DQ white dwarfs in the SDSS}
33:
34: \abstract{Using photometric selection criteria, and in a final step
35: visual inspection of spectra, we find 65 DQ white dwarfs in the
36: Data Release 4 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. 37 of these are
37: new identifications, three more are reclassified DQ from DC, the
38: other 25 have been described as DQ before in the literature. We
39: derive effective temperatures and carbon abundances for 60 of
40: these stars. The results confirm the main conclusions of
41: \cite{Dufour.Bergeron.ea05}. The majority of stars defines a
42: clear sequence in the C abundance vs. \Teff\ diagram, with high
43: abundances found at high \Teff\ and vice versa. We also confirm
44: with high significance a second sequence with an abundance about
45: 1 dex higher at the same \Teff, and discuss the nature and
46: possible origin of the high-C sequence. \keywords{stars: white
47: dwarfs -- stars: abundances} }
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53: White dwarfs of spectral type DQ are defined as showing atomic or
54: molecular features of carbon in a helium atmosphere. Contrary to other
55: metals (notably Ca) found in cool white dwarfs, which are thought to
56: be provided through an accretion process from outside the star, the
57: most widely accepted explanation for the DQs is dredge-up from the
58: underlying carbon/oxygen core through the expanding He convection zone
59: \citep{Koester.Weidemann.ea82, Pelletier.Fontaine.ea86}. A detailed
60: summary of the basic properties of this class and earlier references
61: to spectroscopic analyses has been given recently in a comprehensive
62: paper by \citet[][= DB05 henceforth]{Dufour.Bergeron.ea05} and need
63: not be repeated here.
64:
65:
66: In addition to the general understanding of the nature, evolutionary
67: relations and origin of the peculiar spectral types of white dwarfs,
68: the DQs are of special interest, because they provide information
69: about the deeper layers of the stars. The transition between the outer
70: helium layer and the carbon/oxygen core -- the result of the helium
71: burning in the progenitor -- is not abrupt, but rather gradual as
72: determined by the diffusion equilibrium
73: \citep{Koester.Weidemann.ea82}. We can predict the structure of this
74: transition quantitatively \citep{Pelletier.Fontaine.ea86}, as well as
75: the depth of the helium convection zone at a given effective
76: temperature and mass of the star. The observed carbon abundance in the
77: atmosphere is then directly related to the thickness of the helium
78: layer remaining from the previous nuclear evolution, which is a very
79: important parameter for the understanding of stellar evolution. The
80: first estimate of this thickness by \cite{Pelletier.Fontaine.ea86} --
81: $\log M_{He}/M \approx -3.75$ -- was much thinner than predicted by
82: evolutionary calculations of the AGB phase. However, the recent
83: abundance determinations by DB05, together with the new models of the
84: outer layers by \cite{Fontaine.Brassard05} are in much better
85: agreement with theoretical expectations. Nevertheless, there are still
86: many problems understanding the detailed connection of the DQ stars to
87: possible helium-rich progenitors \citep{Althaus.Serenelli.ea05,
88: Scoccola.Althaus.ea06}.
89:
90: When searching for correlations of DQ parameters, e.g. between
91: atmospheric carbon abundance and effective temperature, it is very
92: helpful to have available a homogeneous sample of observations. It has
93: been found in previous studies that abundances determined from atomic
94: lines in the UV or molecular bands in the optical may sometimes differ
95: significantly \citep[e.g.][]{Provencal.Shipman.ea02}, possibly
96: blurring any correlation if only one or the other observation is
97: available for different objects \citep{Weidemann.Koester95}. Such a
98: homogenous sample is currently provided by the Sloan Digital Sky
99: Survey, and DB05 provides the first quantitative analysis of 40 DQs
100: from the Data Release 1 (DR1). In this paper we report similar results
101: for 40 new DQs (and 20 previously known) extracted from DR4
102: \citep{Adelman-McCarthy.Agueros.ea06}.
103:
104:
105: \section{Selection of DQ candidates}
106: DR4 of the SDSS contains spectra for approximately 240000 objects
107: classified as ``point source'' or ``unknown''. In order to narrow
108: down this huge database to tractable numbers we have applied three
109: consecutive selection steps, the first two based on the SDSS
110: photometry, the last on the spectra.
111:
112: \subsection{DQ regions in SDSS color space and theoretical models}
113: Theoretical SDSS colors can be calculated from synthetic spectra by
114: convolving them with the 5 $ugriz$ SDSS band passes. Our model grid is
115: similar to that described in \cite{Carollo.Koester.ea03}, but extended
116: to cover effective temperatures from 13000~K to 4400~K. Logarithmic C
117: abundance by number relative to He ( = [C/He])range from $-8$ to $-4$
118: in steps of 0.5. The standard grid used here has a surface gravity of
119: \logg\ = 8.00, but additional grids were calculated with 7.5 and 8.5
120: for comparison. The models are fully blanketed, fully including the line and
121: molecular band absorption in the calculation of the
122: atmospheric structure. Non-ideal effects in the form of a lowering of
123: the dissociation energy of the C$_2$ molecule is included in a very
124: approximate way.
125:
126: The transmission curves for the five filters (for airmass 1.3 as
127: recommended) were obtained from the SDSS web sites; the zero-points for
128: the magnitudes were set to correspond to the AB system of magnitudes
129: \citep{Fukugita.Ichikawa.ea96} except for small changes to $u,i,z$
130: (-0.04, 0.01, 0.02) similar to those discussed in
131: Eisenstein et al. (2006).
132:
133:
134: The dependence on \Teff\ and [C/He] is strongest in the $u-g$
135: vs. $g-r$ two-color diagram and much less in the remaining independent
136: indices used, $r-i$ and $i-z$. Figure~\ref{figugr} shows this diagram
137: with the theoretical grid, and 40 observed DQs from
138: \cite{Harris.Liebert.ea03} and \cite{Kleinman.Harris.ea04}, which
139: indeed fall in or very near the theoretical grid. Note that we have
140: not applied any correction for galactic extinction (see DB05).
141:
142: \begin{figure}
143: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm]{dqfig1.ps}
144: \caption{Theoretical SDSS color grid for DQ white dwarfs. Thick
145: continuous lines are lines of constant carbon abundance from [C/He]
146: = -8.0 (top) to $-4$ (bottom), step 1.0. Thin dashed: lines of
147: constant \Teff\ from 4400~K (right) to 13000~K (left) in steps of
148: 200~K. Crosses show the observed DQ stars from
149: \citet{Harris.Liebert.ea03} and \cite {Kleinman.Harris.ea04}
150: \label{figugr}}
151: \end{figure}
152:
153:
154: \begin{table*}[ht!]
155: \caption{40 new DQ white dwarfs. The first
156: columns give the SDSS name and internal designation. Next is
157: effective temperature determined from a fit to the photometry. The
158: carbon abundance [C/He] is determined from a model fit to the
159: spectrum, keeping the temperature fixed. The final column gives a
160: classification and remarks. WD\,1105+412 and WD\,0913+103 are reclassified from
161: a DC classification in \cite{McCook.Sion99}. GD\,311 is classified
162: DC in \cite{Kawka.Vennes06}, but we believe very weak Swan bands
163: to be present.}
164: \begin{center} \scriptsize
165: \begin{tabular}{l|rrr|ccc|c}
166: \hline
167: \noalign{\smallskip}
168: SDSS Name&MJD&Plate&Fid&$ \Teff [K]$& [C/He] &$ \sigma$
169: [C/He]&Spectral Type/Ref\\
170: \noalign{\smallskip}
171: \hline
172: SDSS\,J074204.79+434835.7&53052&1736&139&7738&-5.47&0.04&DQ \\
173: SDSS\,J084131.55+332915.6&52642&933&16&6810&-6.62&0.05&DQ\\
174: SDSS\,J085239.66+042804.5&52670&1190&177&9555&&&DQ \\
175: SDSS\,J085506.62+063904.7&52668&1189&535&7337&-5.99&0.01&DQ \\
176: SDSS\,J085709.01+060357.4&52668&1189&27&8210&-5.00&0.02&DQ \\
177: SDSS\,J090449.73+395416.4&52703&1199&595&7319&-5.74&0.05&DQ \\
178: SDSS\,J090514.78+090426.5&52973&1300&420&8861&-4.89&0.01&DQ
179: (H$\alpha$ ?)\\
180: SDSS\,J090632.17+470235.8&52606&898&565&5070&-4.31&0.01&DQ
181: (weak bands)\\
182: SDSS\,J091602.73+101110.5&53050&1739&592&8715&-4.81&0.01&DQ\\
183: SDSS\,J091830.27+484323.0&52637&900&429&8884&-3.72&0.06&DQ\\
184: SDSS\,J092153.46+342136.9&52995&1274&216&8202&-5.46&0.09&DQ \\
185: SDSS\,J092613.46+472521.1&52637&900&41&7261&-6.41&0.06&DQ \\
186: SDSS\,J092909.03+331011.7&52991&1593&94&6361&-5.57&0.01&DQ\\
187: SDSS\,J094014.65+090641.8&52993&1304&45&6169&-7.34&0.05&DQpec
188: (rounded bands)\\
189: SDSS\,J094115.18+090154.4&52993&1304&9&9122&-4.73&0.02&DQ\\
190: SDSS\,J094138.08+441458.2&52672&1202&58&8113&-5.42&0.06&DQ \\
191: SDSS\,J095934.95+453725.4&52703&942&446&7211&-5.52&0.06&DQ \\
192: SDSS\,J100059.82+100531.7&53053&1308&307&7958&-4.83&0.02&DQ, WD\,1105+412 \\
193: SDSS\,J101750.38+373637.5&52996&1427&216&7497&-5.79&0.03&DQ \\
194: SDSS\,J101800.00+083820.3&52762&1237&621&7784&-5.85&0.01&DQ\\
195: SDSS\,J102635.81+580714.8&52316&559&6&8879&-4.56&0.03&DQ \\
196: SDSS\,J110759.46+405910.9&53046&1437&512&7169&-6.45&0.02&DQ \\
197: SDSS\,J110912.21+424956.0&53053&1363&37&9402&-4.84&0.08&DQ, WD\,0913+103 \\
198: SDSS\,J112604.29+441938.6&53062&1365&564&7097&-6.38&0.05&DQ \\
199: SDSS\,J113534.61+572451.7&53033&1310&485&7385&-6.42&0.02&
200: GD 311, \cite{Kawka.Vennes06} \\
201: SDSS\,J115149.92+452729.8&53084&1368&503&8829&-4.75&0.04&DQ\\
202: SDSS\,J122545.87+470613.0&53117&1451&35&6109&-5.82&0.01&DQ \\
203: SDSS\,J123347.60+125346.1&53169&1616&429&7152&-6.36&0.02&DQ \\
204: SDSS\,J130945.62+444541.0&53084&1375&391&8085&-4.01&0.03&DQ\\
205: SDSS\,J131534.72+471108.9&53062&1461&428&7524&-5.99&0.01&DQ \\
206: SDSS\,J131930.66+140137.1&53112&1773&105&7626&-5.65&0.05&DQ \\
207: SDSS\,J133127.04+670419.5&51988&496&583&8899&-4.91&0.06&DQ
208: (weak bands)\\
209: SDSS\,J143144.83+375011.9&53089&1381&599&6173&-6.97&0.02&DQ\\
210: SDSS\,J152812.05+513445.2&52378&795&319&7531&-5.69&0.03&DQ \\
211: SDSS\,J153447.54+414559.4&53149&1679&616&7804&-5.92&0.02&DQZ (CaII) \\
212: SDSS\,J161653.36+392444.4&52759&1336&572&7319&-5.92&0.02&DQ \\
213: SDSS\,J165436.86+315754.4&52791&1176&238&7258&-5.89&0.01&DQ \\
214: SDSS\,J171341.76+324009.1&52413&976&623&7901&-5.36&0.01&DQ \\
215: SDSS\,J211130.04$-$003628.8&52431&985&35&7168&-6.27&0.05&DQ\\
216: SDSS\,J213503.32+000318.4&52468&989&198&6413&-6.78&0.03&DQ\\
217: \noalign{\smallskip}
218: \hline
219: \end{tabular}
220: \label{tabledq}
221: \end{center}
222: \end{table*}
223:
224:
225: \begin{table*}[ht!]
226: \caption{25 rediscovered DQ white dwarfs in the same format as
227: Table~\ref{tabledq}. 20 of these are analyzed also in
228: DB05. Information on the remaining 5 can be found in the
229: \cite{McCook.Sion99} catalog (WD\,1426+613),
230: \cite{Liebert.Harris.ea03}, \cite{Carollo.Bucciarelli.ea06}, and
231: \cite{Harris.Liebert.ea03}. }
232: \begin{center} \scriptsize
233: \begin{tabular}{l|rrr|ccc|c}
234: \hline
235: \noalign{\smallskip}
236: SDSS Name&MJD&Plate&Fid&$ \Teff [K]$& [C/He] &$ \sigma$
237: [C/He]&Spectral Type/Ref\\
238: \noalign{\smallskip}
239: \hline
240: SDSS\,J000011.57$-$085008.4&52143&650&450&8042&-5.46&0.08&\\
241: SDSS\,J000807.54$-$103405.6&52141&651&199&7768&-5.66&0.06&\\
242: SDSS\,J002531.50$-$110800.9&52145&653&86&8367&-4.96&0.01&\\
243: SDSS\,J015433.57$-$004047.2&51871&403&268&7435&-5.89&0.03&\\
244: SDSS\,J015441.75+140308.0&51877&430&558&6511&-6.89&0.01&\\
245: SDSS\,J032054.11$-$071625.4&51924&460&236&6266&-5.45&\\
246: SDSS\,J033218.22$-$003722.1&51810&415&240&8600&-4.62&0.03&\\
247: SDSS\,J090157.92+575135.9&51924&483&600&&&&
248: \cite{Liebert.Harris.ea03} \\
249: SDSS\,J091922.18+023605.0&51929&473&458&11566&&&\\
250: SDSS\,J093537.00+002422.0&52314&476&461&4958&-6.19&0.02&
251: \cite{Harris.Liebert.ea03} \\
252: SDSS\,J094004.64+021022.6&52026&477&493&7283&-5.95&0.01&\\
253: SDSS\,J095137.60+624348.7&51943&487&227&8388&-5.11&0.10&\\
254: SDSS\,J113359.94+633113.2&52059&597&139&12082&&&\\
255: SDSS\,J114851.68$-$012612.8&52056&329&578&9174&-3.73&0.01&\\
256: SDSS\,J125359.61+013925.6&52026&523&252&8282&-4.98&0.02&\\
257: SDSS\,J123752.12+415625.8&53090&1454&146&5846&-5.51&0.01&
258: \cite{Carollo.Bucciarelli.ea06} \\
259: SDSS\,J132858.20+590851.0&52411&959&504&&&&
260: \cite{Liebert.Harris.ea03} \\
261: SDSS\,J142728.30+611026.4&52368&607&379&6427&-6.83&0.01&WD\,1426+613 \\
262: SDSS\,J144407.25+043446.8&52026&587&418&9449&-3.65&0.05&\\
263: SDSS\,J144808.07$-$004755.9&51662&308&145&7063&-6.50&0.04&\\
264: SDSS\,J154810.66+562647.7&52072&617&551&8119&-5.46&0.07&\\
265: SDSS\,J155413.53+033634.5&52023&595&373&6512&-6.94&0.03&\\
266: SDSS\,J164328.54+400204.3&52050&630&386&7144&-6.20&0.07&\\
267: SDSS\,J165538.51+372247.1&52071&632&92&8997&-4.75&0.06&\\
268: SDSS\,J205316.34$-$070204.3&52176&636&267&6382&-5.45&0.02&\\
269: \noalign{\smallskip}
270: \hline
271: \end{tabular}
272: \label{tabledq1}
273: \end{center}
274: \end{table*}
275:
276:
277:
278:
279: Using this information about the position of DQs in the SDSS color
280: space, we have as a first selection step extracted from the SDSS
281: database all objects in the ``point source'' and ``unknown''
282: categories falling into the region defined by
283: \[ -0.8 < u-g < 1.5 \mbox{\qquad and \qquad} -0.8 < g-r < 1.5,
284: \]
285: resulting in 86856 selected objects. This sample still contains large
286: numbers of DA white dwarfs and quasars. We therefore have in a second
287: step refined the color region using a polygon in the $u-g, g-r$
288: plane. The polygon area follows rather closely the outline of the
289: theoretical grid, except at the hot end. Since the grid converges
290: towards a single line (the models are much less dependent on the C
291: abundance) the polygon at the hot end is significantly wider in
292: $u-g$. Applying this selection step narrowed the candidate sample down
293: to 44928 objects.
294:
295:
296:
297:
298: \subsection{Selection in 4-dimensional color space}
299: Since we consider for the moment only the dependence of colors on
300: \Teff\ and [C/He], it is obvious that the theoretical grid must define
301: a 2-dimensional surface in the 4-dimensional color space
302: ($u-g,g-r,r-i,i-z$). That the variation is strongest in the first two
303: components suggest that this surface might be approximated by a plane
304: and this is confirmed by looking at different projections of the grid in
305: two- or three-dimensional subspaces. We have therefore fitted a plane
306: to the nodes of this grid using a $\chi^2$ minimization technique.
307: The fit is extremely good, with typical deviations of grid points from
308: the plane of 0.03 mag.
309:
310: The equation of the plane is
311: \[
312: \left(\begin{array}{c} u-g \\g-r\\r-i\\i-z\end{array}\right)_{plane} =
313: \left( \begin{array}{r} 0.00003\\-0.00001\\-0.09854\\-0.18105
314: \end{array}\right)
315: + (g-r) \left( \begin{array}{r}
316: -0.00007\\1.00004\\0.53380\\0.19325\end{array}
317: \right)
318: \]
319: \[ + (u-g) \left( \begin{array}{r}
320: 1.00000\\-0.00006\\-0.02747\\0.14871 \end{array} \right)
321: \]
322: where we have used the first two colors directly as the two variables
323: for the plane. The reasonable region for DQs is given by the limits
324: \[
325: -0.55 < u-g < 1.3 \mbox{\qquad and \qquad} -0.3 < g-r < 1.4. \]
326:
327: This plane representation of theoretical DQ colors was used in the
328: final photometric selection step. We defined a minimum ``distance''
329: $d$ from the plane for each observed object by measuring each
330: coordinate in units of their individual measurement errors
331: \[
332: d^2 =
333: \sum_{i=1}^{4}\left(\frac{c_{ob}(i)-c_{th}(i)}{\sigma(i)}\right)^2 .
334: \]
335: Here $c_{ob}$ and $c_{th}$ are the four observed and theoretical SDSS
336: colors, and $\sigma$ the measurement error of the observation. We
337: eliminated the majority of objects by using a limit of $d=6.5$. This
338: limit had been determined from a test using the 40 DQs of
339: Fig.~\ref{figugr}. The final sample contained 6952 DQ candidates.
340:
341:
342:
343: \subsection{Color space for different surface gravities}
344: We have also fitted the theoretical grids for \logg\ = 7.5 and 8.5 in
345: the same way. The resulting planes were practically indistinguishable
346: from the \logg\ = 8.0 plane, however, the lines of constant
347: temperature or C abundance are slightly shifted. This corresponds to
348: the well known fact for DQs that the parameters \logg\ and [C/H] are
349: degenerate. They cannot both be determined from photometry (nor
350: spectra), because a change of \logg\ can always be very nearly
351: compensated with a corresponding change of [C/He], and one of the two
352: has to be {\em assumed} to be able to proceed. Using the fact that
353: most white dwarfs cluster around 0.6~\Msun, we have assumed \logg\ =
354: 8, as did DB05.
355:
356:
357: \subsection{Visual classification of the 6952 candidates}
358: Spectra for all remaining candidates were extracted from the SDSS
359: database and inspected visually. More than 95\%\ turned out to be
360: quasars, easily recognized by their strong and broad emission
361: lines. Of the remaining objects some were DA white dwarfs (broad
362: Balmer absorption), some galaxies with narrow absorption lines. The
363: DQs, the topic of this study, were identified through their molecular
364: Swan bands. In total we found 65 DQs, of which 25 were already known
365: in the literature and 37 are new detections, and 3 reclassifications
366: from a spectral type of DC.
367:
368: Tables~\ref{tabledq} and \ref{tabledq1} list all 65 DQ with their SDSS
369: names, internal identifiers, and atmospheric parameters, determined as
370: described in the next section. Most of the objects show only carbon
371: features. SDSS\,J090514.78+090426.5 shows a feature near the position
372: of H$\alpha$, but nothing near the other Balmer lines, and the
373: presence of hydrogen is highly uncertain. SDSS\,J153447.54+414559.4
374: shows Ca\,II H and K lines with equivalent widths of 2.1 and
375: 1.0~\AA. The wings are broad and the distance of the star is very
376: likely less than 100~pc, implying a photospheric origin of the lines,
377: probably due to accretion. SDSS\,J094014.65+090641.8 shows rounded
378: bands similar to SDSS\,J223224.0-074434.3 in
379: \cite{Harris.Liebert.ea03}.
380:
381: \begin{figure}
382: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm]{dqfig2.ps}
383: \caption{Comparison of effective temperatures determined from the
384: photometry with results from DB05
385: \label{compt}}
386: \end{figure}
387:
388:
389:
390:
391: \section{Atmospheric analysis of the DQ white dwarfs}
392: \subsection{Photometry}
393:
394: The parameters \Teff\ and [C/He] were determined by minimizing in the
395: sense of a $\chi^2$ the distance between the observed point in
396: 4-dimensional color space with model colors interpolated on the \Teff\
397: - [C/He] grid. $\chi^2$ minimization was obtained with the AMOEBA
398: routine from \cite{Press.Teukolsky.ea92}. Since our sample contains 20
399: objects in common with DB05, we compare the
400: derived \Teff\ in Fig.~\ref{compt}. The agreement in \Teff\ with those
401: from DB05, which are based on photometry and
402: spectra is excellent, confirming that photometry alone already gives a
403: reliable \Teff. From the differences between the two completely
404: independent determinations we estimate a typical error for \Teff\
405: of 190~K. This is a much more realistic error than the internal errors
406: from the $\chi^2$ routine; it is also very similar to the \Teff\ error
407: of 170~K cited by DB05, and we take this as our error estimate for
408: \Teff. On the other hand, the derived carbon
409: abundances differ markedly, with a much higher scatter and also
410: systematic differences. This is not really surprising, since the
411: colors for different abundances converge at the high temperature end
412: and a [C/He] determination based on colors alone will be inaccurate to
413: impossible. In addition, small uncertainties of the magnitude
414: zero-points could shift the whole grid by a few hundreds of a
415: magnitude, resulting in systematic changes. These abundances are not
416: used further and therefore not shown here.
417:
418: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
419: Fortunately, SDSS provides photometry {\em and} spectroscopy. The
420: spectra were fitted with the theoretical spectra from our standard
421: grid using the same methods used by us for other types of white dwarfs
422: \citep{Koester.Napiwotzki.ea01, Homeier.Koester.ea98}. In principle
423: the spectroscopic fit provides \Teff\ and [C/He] (\logg\ = 8 is always
424: assumed). However, since we have shown the high reliability of the
425: photometric determination, we have kept the temperature fixed and
426: determined only the carbon abundance from the spectra, leading to
427: smaller errors of these abundances. These abundances are given in
428: Table~\ref{tabledq} and \ref{tabledq1}. For the five objects with
429: missing entries in the [C/He] column we could not obtain reasonable
430: fits within our grid. The spectral fits for the region around the
431: strongest Swan bands of the remaining 60 objects are shown in
432: Figure~\ref{specfit1} to Fig.~\ref{specfit3} in the appendix; the
433: values are also in Table~\ref{tabledq} and \ref{tabledq1}.
434:
435: \begin{figure}
436: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm]{dqfig3.ps}
437: \caption{comparison of carbon abundances from spectral fitting with
438: results from DB05
439: \label{compc}}
440: \end{figure}
441:
442:
443:
444: Figure~\ref{compc} gives a comparison of our final results for the
445: carbon abundance with DB05 for the common
446: objects. The general agreement is very good, with a small systematic
447: shift of about 0.2 dex, increasing from lower to high abundances. The
448: [C/He] abundances of DB05 are on average slightly
449: higher than our values.
450:
451:
452: \section{Results and discussion}
453: We have identified 40 new DQ white dwarfs and rediscovered another 25
454: from the Data Release 4 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and presented
455: effective temperatures and carbon abundances for 60 of them. This
456: increases very significantly the number of DQs with a careful analysis
457: using up-to-date model atmospheres. Particularly important is the fact
458: that our sample is based on a completely homogenous set of photometry
459: and spectra. This is similar to the work of DB05, who however included
460: also observations from other sources together with 40 SDSS objects in
461: their sample. For the objects in common with their analysis we find
462: good agreement for the parameters, with a slight offset in the
463: abundances of the order of 0.2 dex.
464: \begin{figure}
465: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm]{dqfig4.ps}
466: \caption{Carbon abundance versus effective temperatures. Full circles are
467: the results from this paper. We have added as open circles the results
468: from DB05 for those objects not in our sample
469: \label{comptc}}
470: \end{figure}
471:
472:
473: The major result of this paper is shown in Fig.~\ref{comptc}, which
474: displays the carbon abundance versus effective temperature. In
475: addition to our own results (shown as full circles) we have here
476: included data from DB05 for those objects not included in our sample
477: (open circles). We clearly confirm the three main conclusions of DB05:
478: \begin{itemize}
479: \item The paucity of objects with \Teff\ below 6000~K. Our sample adds
480: only one object clearly below the apparent cutoff, also carbon-rich
481: as the single cool objects in DB05.
482: \item The clear sequence for the majority of the objects, from low
483: \Teff, low [C/He] to high \Teff, high [C/He], indicated by the lower
484: of the two regression line fits (these fits use only the results
485: from this paper). The existence of this sequence
486: was first pointed out by DB05 and shows the large advantage of using
487: a homogenous sample of good quality observations compared to
488: e.g. the study of \cite{Weidemann.Koester95}. The
489: extrapolation of the sequence to 10000~K predicts [C/He] = -4.0, in
490: agreement with the theoretical calculations of
491: \cite{Fontaine.Brassard05} for a He-layer thickness of $10^{-4}$ of
492: the stellar mass.
493: \item The existence of a separate population of carbon-rich DQs, with
494: an abundance about 1 dex higher than the primary sequence. This
495: population seems to form a second sequence, which we have
496: tentatively described with the upper regression line.
497: \end{itemize}
498:
499: Based on one single object with a parallax and thus mass determination
500: of 1.05~\Msun\ in the upper sequence (G47-18 = WD\,0856+33), DB05
501: tentatively suggested that all objects of this group are massive white
502: dwarfs and might be the descendents of the hot DQ stars, which also
503: seem to be massive, although that assertion is also only based on two
504: objects \citep{Liebert.Harris.ea03,
505: MacDonald.Hernanz.ea98, Weidemann05}. Stellar evolution calculations
506: predict smaller He envelope masses for more massive progenitors
507: \citep{Kawai.Saio.ea88} and might lead to the dredge-up occurring at
508: higher effective temperatures \citep{Thejll.Shipman.ea90}. This would
509: also be a natural explanation for the absence of the high-mass tail in
510: the DB mass distribution \citep{Beauchamp.Wesemael.ea96,
511: Liebert.Harris.ea03}.
512:
513: While these conclusions seem rather speculative at present, it is
514: obvious that further study of the large number of DQs with excellent
515: observations coming from SDSS and other large scale survey will
516: provide important clues for the remaining open question of the origin
517: and evolution of white dwarf surface compositions and spectral
518: types. Of particular importance are parallax determinations for DQs on
519: the high abundance sequence.
520:
521:
522: \acknowledgement{ This study was partially supported by a grant from
523: the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KO731/21-1,-2), and would have
524: been impossible without the SDSS. Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky
525: Survey (SDSS) has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation,
526: the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space
527: Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department
528: of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck
529: Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is
530: managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for the
531: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The
532: University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study,
533: the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the
534: Korean Scientist Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the
535: Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute
536: for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, University of
537: Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the
538: United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
539: This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS,
540: Strasbourg, France}
541:
542:
543:
544: %\bibliographystyle{aa}
545: %\bibliography{wdnorm_1,wdnorm_2,wdnorm_3}
546:
547: \begin{thebibliography}{21}
548: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
549:
550: \bibitem[{{Adelman-McCarthy} {et~al.}(2006){Adelman-McCarthy}, {Ag{\"u}eros},
551: {Allam}, {Anderson}, {Anderson}, {Annis}, {Bahcall}, {Baldry}, {Barentine},
552: {Berlind}, {Bernardi}, {Blanton}, {Boroski}, {Brewington}, {Brinchmann},
553: {Brinkmann}, {Brunner}, {Budav{\'a}ri}, {Carey}, {Carr}, {Castander},
554: {Connolly}, {Csabai}, {Czarapata}, {Dalcanton}, {Doi}, {Dong}, {Eisenstein},
555: {Evans}, {Fan}, {Finkbeiner}, {Friedman}, {Frieman}, {Fukugita}, {Gillespie},
556: {Glazebrook}, {Gray}, {Grebel}, {Gunn}, {Gurbani}, {de Haas}, {Hall},
557: {Harris}, {Harvanek}, {Hawley}, {Hayes}, {Hendry}, {Hennessy}, {Hindsley},
558: {Hirata}, {Hogan}, {Hogg}, {Holmgren}, {Holtzman}, {Ichikawa}, {Ivezi{\'c}},
559: {Jester}, {Johnston}, {Jorgensen}, {Juri{\'c}}, {Kent}, {Kleinman}, {Knapp},
560: {Kniazev}, {Kron}, {Krzesinski}, {Kuropatkin}, {Lamb}, {Lampeitl}, {Lee},
561: {Leger}, {Lin}, {Long}, {Loveday}, {Lupton}, {Margon},
562: {Mart{\'{\i}}nez-Delgado}, {Mandelbaum}, {Matsubara}, {McGehee}, {McKay},
563: {Meiksin}, {Munn}, {Nakajima}, {Nash}, {Neilsen}, {Newberg}, {Newman},
564: {Nichol}, {Nicinski}, {Nieto-Santisteban}, {Nitta}, {O'Mullane}, {Okamura},
565: {Owen}, {Padmanabhan}, {Pauls}, {Peoples}, {Pier}, {Pope}, {Pourbaix},
566: {Quinn}, {Richards}, {Richmond}, {Rockosi}, {Schlegel}, {Schneider},
567: {Schroeder}, {Scranton}, {Seljak}, {Sheldon}, {Shimasaku}, {Smith}, {Smol{\v
568: c}i{\'c}}, {Snedden}, {Stoughton}, {Strauss}, {SubbaRao}, {Szalay},
569: {Szapudi}, {Szkody}, {Tegmark}, {Thakar}, {Tucker}, {Uomoto}, {Vanden Berk},
570: {Vandenberg}, {Vogeley}, {Voges}, {Vogt}, {Walkowicz}, {Weinberg}, {West},
571: {White}, {Xu}, {Yanny}, {Yocum}, {York}, {Zehavi}, {Zibetti}, \&
572: {Zucker}}]{Adelman-McCarthy.Agueros.ea06}
573: {Adelman-McCarthy}, J.~K., {Ag{\"u}eros}, M.~A., {Allam}, S.~S., {et~al.} 2006,
574: \apjs, 162, 38
575:
576: \bibitem[{{Althaus} {et~al.}(2005){Althaus}, {Serenelli}, {Panei},
577: {C{\'o}rsico}, {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Berro}, \&
578: {Sc{\'o}ccola}}]{Althaus.Serenelli.ea05}
579: {Althaus}, L.~G., {Serenelli}, A.~M., {Panei}, J.~A., {et~al.} 2005, \aap, 435,
580: 631
581:
582: \bibitem[{{Beauchamp} {et~al.}(1996){Beauchamp}, {Wesemael},
583: {Bergeron}, {Liebert}, \& {Saffer}}]{Beauchamp.Wesemael.ea96}
584: {Beauchamp}, A., {Wesemael}, F., {Bergeron}, P., {Liebert}, J., \&
585: {Saffer}, R.~A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 96: Hydrogen deficient
586: stars, ed. C. S. Jeffery and U. Heber, p.295
587:
588: \bibitem[{{Carollo} {et~al.}(2006){Carollo}, {Bucciarelli}, {Hodgkin},
589: {Lattanzi}, {McLean}, {Morbidelli}, {Smart}, {Spagna}, \&
590: {Terranegra}}]{Carollo.Bucciarelli.ea06}
591: {Carollo}, D., {Bucciarelli}, B., {Hodgkin}, S.~T., {et~al.} 2006, \aap, 448,
592: 579
593:
594: \bibitem[{{Carollo} {et~al.}(2003){Carollo}, {Koester}, {Spagna}, {Lattanzi},
595: \& {Hodgkin}}]{Carollo.Koester.ea03}
596: {Carollo}, D., {Koester}, D., {Spagna}, A., {Lattanzi}, M.~G., \& {Hodgkin},
597: S.~T. 2003, \aap, 400, L13
598:
599: \bibitem[{{Dufour} {et~al.}(2005){Dufour}, {Bergeron}, \&
600: {Fontaine}}]{Dufour.Bergeron.ea05}
601: {Dufour}, P., {Bergeron}, P., \& {Fontaine}, G. 2005, \apj, 627, 404
602:
603: \bibitem[{{Fontaine} \& {Brassard}(2005)}]{Fontaine.Brassard05}
604: {Fontaine}, G. \& {Brassard}, P. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 334: 14th European
605: Workshop on White Dwarfs, ed. D.~{Koester} \& S.~{Moehler}, p.49
606:
607: \bibitem[{{Fukugita} {et~al.}(1996){Fukugita}, {Ichikawa}, {Gunn}, {Doi},
608: {Shimasaku}, \& {Schneider}}]{Fukugita.Ichikawa.ea96}
609: {Fukugita}, M., {Ichikawa}, T., {Gunn}, J.~E., {et~al.} 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
610:
611: \bibitem[{{Harris} {et~al.}(2003){Harris}, {Liebert}, {Kleinman}, {Nitta},
612: {Anderson}, {Knapp}, {Krzesi{\'n}ski}, {Schmidt}, {Strauss}, {Vanden Berk},
613: {Eisenstein}, {Hawley}, {Margon}, {Munn}, {Silvestri}, {Smith}, {Szkody},
614: {Collinge}, {Dahn}, {Fan}, {Hall}, {Schneider}, {Brinkmann}, {Burles},
615: {Gunn}, {Hennessy}, {Hindsley}, {Ivezi{\'c}}, {Kent}, {Lamb}, {Lupton},
616: {Nichol}, {Pier}, {Schlegel}, {SubbaRao}, {Uomoto}, {Yanny}, \&
617: {York}}]{Harris.Liebert.ea03}
618: {Harris}, H.~C., {Liebert}, J., {Kleinman}, S.~J., {et~al.} 2003, \aj, 126,
619: 1023
620:
621: \bibitem[{{Homeier} {et~al.}(1998){Homeier}, {Koester}, {Hagen}, {Jordan},
622: {Heber}, {Engels}, {Reimers}, \& {Dreizler}}]{Homeier.Koester.ea98}
623: {Homeier}, D., {Koester}, D., {Hagen}, H.~J., {et~al.} 1998, \aap, 338, 563
624:
625: \bibitem[{{Kawai} {et~al.}(1988){Kawai}, {Saio}, \& {Nomoto}}]{Kawai.Saio.ea88}
626: {Kawai}, Y., {Saio}, H., \& {Nomoto}, K. 1988, \apj, 328, 207
627:
628: \bibitem[{{Kawka} \& {Vennes}(2006)}]{Kawka.Vennes06}
629: {Kawka}, A. \& {Vennes}, S. 2006, ArXiv astro-ph/0601477
630:
631: \bibitem[{{Kleinman} {et~al.}(2004){Kleinman}, {Harris}, {Eisenstein},
632: {Liebert}, {Nitta}, {Krzesi{\'n}ski}, {Munn}, {Dahn}, {Hawley}, {Pier},
633: {Schmidt}, {Silvestri}, {Smith}, {Szkody}, {Strauss}, {Knapp}, {Collinge},
634: {Mukadam}, {Koester}, {Uomoto}, {Schlegel}, {Anderson}, {Brinkmann}, {Lamb},
635: {Schneider}, \& {York}}]{Kleinman.Harris.ea04}
636: {Kleinman}, S.~J., {Harris}, H.~C., {Eisenstein}, D.~J., {et~al.} 2004, \apj,
637: 607, 426
638:
639: \bibitem[{{Koester} {et~al.}(2001){Koester}, {Napiwotzki}, {Christlieb},
640: {Drechsel}, {Hagen}, {Heber}, {Homeier}, {Karl}, {Leibundgut}, {Moehler},
641: {Nelemans}, {Pauli}, {Reimers}, {Renzini}, \&
642: {Yungelson}}]{Koester.Napiwotzki.ea01}
643: {Koester}, D., {Napiwotzki}, R., {Christlieb}, N., {et~al.} 2001, \aap, 378,
644: 556
645:
646: \bibitem[{{Koester} {et~al.}(1982){Koester}, {Weidemann}, \&
647: {Zeidler}}]{Koester.Weidemann.ea82}
648: {Koester}, D., {Weidemann}, V., \& {Zeidler}, E.~. 1982, \aap, 116, 147
649:
650: \bibitem[{{Liebert} {et~al.}(2003){Liebert}, {Harris}, {Dahn}, {Schmidt},
651: {Kleinman}, {Nitta}, {Krzesi{\'n}ski}, {Eisenstein}, {Smith}, {Szkody},
652: {Hawley}, {Anderson}, {Brinkmann}, {Collinge}, {Fan}, {Hall}, {Knapp},
653: {Lamb}, {Margon}, {Schneider}, \& {Silvestri}}]{Liebert.Harris.ea03}
654: {Liebert}, J., {Harris}, H.~C., {Dahn}, C.~C., {et~al.} 2003, \aj, 126, 2521
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Macdonald} {et~al.}(1998){Macdonald}, {Hernanz}, \&
657: {Jose}}]{MacDonald.Hernanz.ea98}
658: {Macdonald}, J., {Hernanz}, M., \& {Jose}, J. 1998, \mnras, 296, 523
659:
660: \bibitem[{{McCook} \& {Sion}(1999)}]{McCook.Sion99}
661: {McCook}, G.~P. \& {Sion}, E.~M. 1999, \apjs, 121, 1
662:
663: \bibitem[{{Pelletier} {et~al.}(1986){Pelletier}, {Fontaine}, {Wesemael},
664: {Michaud}, \& {Wegner}}]{Pelletier.Fontaine.ea86}
665: {Pelletier}, C., {Fontaine}, G., {Wesemael}, F., {Michaud}, G., \& {Wegner}, G.
666: 1986, \apj, 307, 242
667:
668: \bibitem[{{Press} {et~al.}(1992){Press}, {Teukolsky}, {Vetterling}, \&
669: {Flannery}}]{Press.Teukolsky.ea92}
670: {Press}, W.~H., {Teukolsky}, S.~A., {Vetterling}, W.~T., \& {Flannery}, B.~P.
671: 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing
672: (Cambridge: University Press, 2nd ed.)
673:
674: \bibitem[{{Provencal} {et~al.}(2002){Provencal}, {Shipman}, {Koester},
675: {Wesemael}, \& {Bergeron}}]{Provencal.Shipman.ea02}
676: {Provencal}, J.~L., {Shipman}, H.~L., {Koester}, D., {Wesemael}, F., \&
677: {Bergeron}, P. 2002, \apj, 568, 324
678:
679: \bibitem[{{Sc\'occola} {et~al.}(2006){Sc\'occola}, {Althaus}, {Serenelli},
680: {Rohrmann}, \& {Corsico}}]{Scoccola.Althaus.ea06}
681: {Sc\'occola}, C., {Althaus}, L., {Serenelli}, A., {Rohrmann}, R., \& {Corsico},
682: A. 2006, ArXiv astro-ph/0410214
683:
684: \bibitem[{{Thejll} {et~al.}(1990){Thejll}, {Shipman}, {Macdonald}, \&
685: {Macfarland}}]{Thejll.Shipman.ea90}
686: {Thejll}, P., {Shipman}, H.~L., {Macdonald}, J., \& {Macfarland}, W.~M. 1990,
687: \apj, 361, 197
688:
689: \bibitem[{{Weidemann}(2005)}]{Weidemann05}
690: {Weidemann}, V. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 334: 14th European Workshop on White
691: Dwarfs, ed. D.~{Koester} \& S.~{Moehler}, p.15
692:
693: \bibitem[{{Weidemann} \& {Koester}(1995)}]{Weidemann.Koester95}
694: {Weidemann}, V. \& {Koester}, D. 1995, \aap, 297, 216
695:
696: \end{thebibliography}
697:
698:
699:
700:
701:
702:
703:
704: \appendix
705: \section{Graphical display of spectral fits for 60 DQs}
706: \begin{figure*}
707: \includegraphics[width=17.2cm]{dqfigA1.ps}
708: \caption{Spectral fit for DQ white dwarfs. Thin (blue): observed;
709: thick (red): model. Vertical axis is relative intensity on an
710: arbitrary scale. \label{specfit1} }
711: \end{figure*}
712:
713: \begin{figure*}
714: \includegraphics[width=17.5cm]{dqfigA2.ps}
715: \caption{Spectral fit for DQ white dwarfs; continued from
716: Fig.~\ref{specfit1} \label{specfit2} }
717: \end{figure*}
718:
719: \begin{figure*}
720: \includegraphics[width=17.5cm]{dqfigA3.ps}
721: \caption{Spectral fit for DQ white dwarfs; continued from
722: Fig.~\ref{specfit2} \label{specfit3} }
723: \end{figure*}
724:
725:
726:
727:
728:
729: \end{document}
730:
731:
732: