1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
5: \newcommand{\myemail}{kilic@astro.as.utexas.edu}
6: \newcommand{\msun} {$M_\odot$}
7: %\slugcomment{To be Submitted to ApJL}
8: \shorttitle{Debris Disks around WDs}
9: \shortauthors{Kilic et al.}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13:
14: \title{Debris Disks Around White Dwarfs: The DAZ Connection}
15:
16: \author{Mukremin Kilic\altaffilmark{1,2}, Ted von Hippel\altaffilmark{2}, S. K. Leggett\altaffilmark{1,3}, and D. E. Winget\altaffilmark{2}}
17:
18: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Space Science, Planetary Astronomy Program.}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Astronomy, 1 University Station
20: C1400, Austin TX 78712, USA; kilic@astro.as.utexas.edu}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{Joint Astronomy Centre, 660 N. A'ohoku Place, University Park, Hilo HI 96720, USA}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24:
25: We present near-infrared spectroscopic observations of 20 previously known DAZ white dwarfs obtained
26: at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. Two of these white dwarfs (G29-38 and GD362) are known to display
27: significant K-band excesses due to circumstellar debris disks. Here we report the discovery of excess K-band
28: radiation from another DAZ white dwarf, WD0408-041 (GD56).
29: Using spectroscopic observations, we show that the excess radiation cannot be
30: explained by a stellar or substellar companion, and is likely to be caused by a warm debris disk.
31: Our observations strengthen the connection between the debris disk phenomena and the observed metal abundances in
32: cool DAZ white dwarfs. However, we do not find any excess infrared emission from the most metal rich DAZs with $T_{\rm eff}=$
33: 16000 -- 20000 K. This suggests that the metal abundances in warmer DAZ white dwarfs
34: may require another explanation.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \keywords{stars: individual (WD0408-041, GD56)$—-$white dwarfs}
38:
39: \section{Introduction}
40:
41: The presence of planets around solar type stars suggests that some white dwarfs should have planetary systems as well.
42: Even though planets within 5 AU of their parent stars will most likely not survive the red giant phases,
43: much of the outer planets, Kuiper belt objects, and Oort-like comet clouds are predicted to survive around white dwarf stars (Debes \& Sigurdsson
44: 2002). Near and mid-infrared searches for stellar and substellar companions to white dwarfs have resulted in the
45: discovery of late type dwarfs and two brown dwarfs (Farihi et al. 2005), but no planetary systems yet (Mullally et al.
46: 2006).
47: The search for the effects of reflex orbital motion in changing light travel times caused by possible planetary companions
48: to pulsating white dwarfs (Winget et al. 2003) has provided strong limits on one object so far,
49: G117-B15A (Kepler et al. 2005). Finding a Jupiter-size planet around an intrinsically faint, Earth-size white dwarf would herald
50: a new age of direct studies of extra solar planets.
51:
52: An easier way to detect the signatures of planetary systems around white dwarfs is via debris disks.
53: Planets in previously stable orbits around a star undergoing mass loss may become unstable, and some of these systems may result
54: in close encounters which could result in tidal stripping of a parent body that would end up in a circumstellar debris disk
55: (Debes \& Sigurdsson 2002; Jura 2003). Until recently, there was only a single white dwarf known to have a circumstellar
56: debris disk, G29-38 (see Chary et al. 1999). G29-38 is a pulsating DAZ white dwarf with a hydrogen rich atmosphere that has trace amounts
57: of metals. Infrared excess around this white dwarf was initially thought
58: to be due to a brown dwarf companion (Zuckerman \& Becklin 1987), however, follow-up observations in
59: the near- and mid-infrared showed that the excess emission is caused by a debris disk. Reach et al. (2005) discovered silicate
60: emission around G29-38 and could explain the observed mid-infrared spectrum by a combination of amorphous olivine, amorphous carbon,
61: and crystalline forsterite. These observations suggest a relatively recent disruption of one or perhaps a few comets or
62: asteroids around this white dwarf.
63:
64: The presence of metals in the photosphere of G29-38 is probably related to the presence of a dust disk around the star.
65: Possible scenarios for the explanation of the metal abundances in DAZ white dwarfs include accretion from the interstellar
66: medium (ISM; Dupuis et al. 1992), cometary impacts (Alcock et al. 1986), and accretion of asteroidal material from a surrounding
67: debris disk (Graham et al. 1990). If accretion from the ISM is responsible for the observed metal abundances, we would expect to
68: find cool DAZs only near interstellar clouds since the diffusion timescales for the metals in their photospheres
69: ($\sim$years) are shorter than the cloud crossing timescales ($\geq$10$^4$ years).
70: Yet Zuckerman et al. (2003) did not find any correlation between the locations and relatively large numbers of DAZs
71: with the locations and amount of ISM present within the local bubble.
72:
73: The discovery of the most massive (1.24$M_{\odot}$) and metal rich white dwarf currently known, GD362, by Gianninas
74: et al. (2004) and Kawka \& Vennes (2005; 2006) stimulated a search for a debris disk around it. GD362 is the most extreme DAZ
75: star with nearly solar iron and magnesium abundances (log(Fe/H) = -4.5 and log(Mg/H) = -4.8).
76: A breakthrough came eighteen years after the discovery of a debris disk around G29-38, when Becklin et al. (2005) and Kilic et al.
77: (2005) discovered significant excess infrared radiation from GD362. The observed near- and mid-infrared excess around this star
78: could only be explained by a circumstellar debris disk. These recent results support the idea that accretion from a surrounding
79: debris disk can explain the metal abundances observed in cool DAZ white dwarfs.
80:
81: Calcium abundances\footnote{[Ca/H] is the logarithm of the Ca/H abundance ratio by numbers.} for known DAZs (Zuckerman et al. 2003;
82: Gianninas et al. 2004; Berger et al. 2005) range from [Ca/H]= -5.2 to -12.7.
83: With several stars being more metal rich than G29-38 ([Ca/H]=-6.9), they
84: provide a unique opportunity to test if the observed metal abundances can be explained with debris disks similar to G29-38 and GD362.
85: With a goal of determining the fraction of DAZs with detectable near-infrared excess emission from warm debris disks, we obtained
86: near-infrared spectroscopy of 20 DAZ white dwarfs including G29-38 and GD362.
87: Our observations are discussed in \S 2, while an analysis of the spectroscopic data and results from this analysis are
88: discussed in \S 3.
89:
90: \section{Observations}
91:
92: \subsection{Photometry}
93:
94: All of the DAZ white dwarfs identified by Zuckerman et al. (2003) and Koester et al. (2005) are bright enough to be detected in the
95: Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). However, the 2MASS photometry in the $H$ and $K$ bands is inaccurate for the majority of the
96: objects, making the search for infrared excess around these objects unreliable.
97: Figure 1 presents 2MASS photometry versus effective temperatures for single DAZ white dwarfs studied by Berger et al. (2005), along with
98: the predicted sequences for DA (solid line) and DB white dwarfs (dashed line) from Bergeron et al. (1995).
99: The 2MASS photometry for G29-38 and the IRTF photometry for GD362 (filled triangles) are also plotted.
100: Several objects are only detected in the $J$ and $H$ bands, but not in the $K$ band, and are therefore not included in
101: the bottom panel.
102: Even though the large error bars in 2MASS photometry prevent any definitive conclusion, it is clear from this figure that
103: several objects, most notably GD56, show excess $K$ band flux at the $2-3 \sigma$ level.
104:
105: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
106:
107: We used the 0.8--5.4 Micron Medium-Resolution Spectrograph and Imager (SpeX; Rayner et al. 2003) on the 3m NASA Infrared
108: Telescope Facility (IRTF) and 0.5$\arcsec$ slit to obtain a resolving power of
109: 90--210 (average resolution of 150) over the 0.8--2.5 $\mu$m range.
110: Our observations were performed under conditions of thin cirrus and partly cloudy skies between November 2 -- 7, 2005.
111: To remove the dark current and the sky signal from the data, the observations were taken in two different
112: positions on the slit (A and B) separated by 10$\arcsec$.
113: The total exposure times for individual objects ranged from 16 minutes to 96 minutes.
114: Internal calibration lamps (a 0.1W incandescent lamp and an Argon lamp) were used
115: for flat-fielding and wavelength calibration, respectively. In order to correct for telluric features and flux calibrate the spectra,
116: nearby bright A0V stars were observed at an airmass similar to the target star observations.
117: We used an IDL-based package, Spextool version 3.2 (Cushing et al. 2004), to reduce our data (see Kilic et al. 2005 for details).
118: Using the nearby A0V star observations and the XTELLCOR package (Vacca et al. 2003), we created a telluric spectrum for each
119: A0V star observation, and used these spectra to flux calibrate and correct the telluric features in the white dwarf spectra.
120:
121: \section{Results}
122:
123: Figure 2 presents the flux calibrated spectra of our DAZ sample (black lines; ordered in $T_{\rm eff}$) and their respective DA white dwarf
124: model atmospheres (red lines; kindly made available to us by D. Koester and D. Saumon). The resolution of the model white dwarf
125: spectra were not matched to the instrumental resolution in order to show the predicted locations of the Paschen lines (0.955,
126: 1.005, 1.094, 1.282, and 1.876$\mu$m). Changing the resolution of these models would only make the hydrogen lines
127: shallower but not change the overall shape of the expected continuum.
128: The observed white dwarf spectra are affected by strong telluric features between $1.35 - 1.45 \mu$m, $1.80 - 2.05
129: \mu$m, and longward of $2.5 \mu$m (a typical telluric spectrum observed at the IRTF is presented in Figure 3 of Kilic et al. 2005).
130: Therefore, weak features observed in several stars in these wavelength ranges are likely to be due to telluric correction problems.
131:
132: We derived synthetic colors of all 20 objects in our sample using our infrared spectra. Since our observations were performed
133: under non-photometric conditions, the absolute flux level in these spectra cannot be trusted. Nevertheless, the relative flux level
134: of the spectra, $J-H$ and $H-K$ colors should not be affected by the non-photometric conditions. The photometric error bars were
135: calculated from the observed scatter of the spectra in individual frames.
136: Effective temperatures, gravities, calcium abundances, 2MASS photometry, and our synthetic colors
137: for these objects are presented in Table 1. A comparison of the 2MASS colors with our synthetic colors shows that
138: they are consistent within the errors.
139: Figure 3 presents synthetic colors versus temperatures, and $J-H$ versus $H-K$
140: color for our sample.
141: The predicted sequences for DA (solid line) and DB white dwarfs (dashed line) from Bergeron et al. (1995) are also shown.
142: Our IRTF observations improved the photometry for these objects significantly, enabling us to use the spectroscopy and photometry
143: to identify near-infrared excess.
144:
145: A comparison of the spectroscopy and photometry for the DAZ white dwarfs in our sample shows that the majority of the stars do not
146: show any excess emission in the near-infrared. However, the two previously known debris disk white dwarfs (G29-38 and GD362) plus
147: WD0408-041 (hereafter GD56) show significant excess in the K-band. The observed spectrum of GD56 is consistent with a typical 14000 K white
148: dwarf in the J band, but it starts to deviate from a DA white dwarf model in the H band, and shows more infrared excess than either of
149: the previously known debris disk white dwarfs. GD56, G29-38, and GD362 are easily distinguishable from the rest of the DAZs in our sample
150: in Figure 3.
151:
152: There are two other objects with possible slight infrared excesses, WD1015+161 and WD1116+026. WD1015+161 observations may have been
153: affected by a nearby object, which is located 2.1$\arcsec$ away and $\sim$0.2 mag fainter than the
154: white dwarf at $J$. We obtained a noisy spectrum
155: of this object that did not reveal any spectral features. The overall flux distribution of this nearby object could be approximated by
156: an $\sim$8000 K blackbody. Hence the observed slight excess for WD1015+161 ($T_{\rm eff}=19300 K$) in the K band may be caused by
157: this nearby object. WD1116+026 may show slight excess in the K band as well, though our synthetic photometry shows that the excess in
158: $H-K$ color is less than 2$\sigma$. This white dwarf appeared to be a single star in our guider and spectral images.
159: Therefore, WD1116+026 ([Ca/H]=-7.3) may be another warm debris disk case, but the observed excess and errors
160: are consistent with photospheric flux from the white dwarf.
161:
162: We note that the observed spectrum of WD0245+541 is better fitted with a 5190 K helium rich white dwarf model atmosphere (dashed line in
163: the last panel in Figure 2) rather than a DA model atmosphere (solid line in the same panel). Only weak H$\alpha$ is seen in the spectrum
164: of cool DAs with $T_{\rm eff}\sim5000$ K, and infrared photometry is often necessary to determine the atmospheric composition of cool
165: white dwarfs (see Bergeron et al. 2001 for a detailed discussion).
166: Greenstein \& Liebert (1990) obtained an H$\alpha$ equivalent width measurement of 0.3\AA\ for WD0245+541.
167: Their classification of this star as a DA white dwarf relies only on optical spectroscopy.
168: Our near-infrared spectrum of this object favors a helium rich atmosphere model,
169: therefore WD0245+541 is more likely to be a DZA instead of a DAZ.
170:
171: \section{Discussion}
172:
173: Figure 4 shows the IRTF spectra of GD56, G29-38, and GD362, along with the expected near-infrared fluxes for each star (dashed lines).
174: The observed excess in GD56 is very similar to the excess seen in G29-38 and GD362. The expected flux levels from a 14400 K
175: blackbody (normalized to the observed GD56 spectrum in the J-band) in the H and K$_S$ bands are 0.27 and 0.17 mJy, respectively.
176: The difference between the observed and expected flux from the star is about 0.05 mJy in the H band, and 0.18 mJy in the K band.
177: Using log $g=$ 7.8 and $T_{\rm eff}=$ 14400 K (Berger et al. 2005) and Bergeron et al. (1995) models, we estimate the absolute
178: K-band magnitude of GD56 to be 11.43 mag. If the observed
179: near-infrared excess is due to a late type dwarf companion, this would correspond to $M_{\rm K}\sim$ 11.38 mag, an early L dwarf
180: (Leggett et al. 2002). We used an L3 dwarf template from the IRTF Spectral Library (Cushing et al. 2005) plus the normalized
181: 14400 K blackbody to attempt to match the observed excess in the K band (green line, top panel).
182: Adding an L3 dwarf to a 14400 K blackbody creates spectral features from 1.3 to 2.5 $\mu$m that are prominent,
183: yet not seen in the spectrum of GD56, and hence a cool dwarf companion cannot explain the excess seen
184: between 1.5 -- 2.5 $\mu$m.
185: Kilic et al. (2005) could fit the observed K band excess around GD362 with a 700 K blackbody.
186: Likewise, Reach et al. (2005) found a best-fit blackbody temperature of 890 K for the debris disk around G29-38.
187: The top panel in Figure 3 shows that the excess around GD56 can be explained with an $\sim$890 K blackbody as well.
188: Therefore, the best explanation for the H and K band excess in GD56 is a circumstellar dust disk heated by the white dwarf.
189:
190: GD56 was included in Farihi et al.'s (2005) search for substellar companions around white dwarfs. They obtained
191: $K$-band photometry for $\sim$1/3 of their sample and used 2MASS photometry for the rest of the objects.
192: Due to low signal-to-noise 2MASS K-band photometry, they did not report a near-infrared excess around GD56 (J. Farihi 2006, private
193: communication). Their search for excess around 371 white dwarfs resulted in the discovery of late type stars and a brown dwarf,
194: but no debris disks. Our IRTF search for near-infrared excess around cool DAZs has revealed two new debris disks.
195: Our sample was restricted to 20 stars (50\% of all known single DAZs) due to the positional constraints imposed by the time of the
196: observations and the declination limit of the telescope. We observed all known DAZs with $0<\alpha<11$ and $19<\alpha<24$ hours and
197: $\delta>-17^o$.
198:
199: A $Spitzer/IRAC$ search for mid-infrared excess around 4 DAZs by von Hippel et al.
200: (2006), 4 more DAZs by Debes et al. (2006, private communication), and an additional 17 DAZs by Farihi et al. (2006,
201: private communication) resulted in the discovery of two more debris disks around cool
202: DAZs ($T_{\rm eff}<10000$ K), increasing the number of debris disks around DAZ white dwarfs to 5.
203: There is some overlap between our IRTF program and the Spitzer programs; the total number of DAZs observed so far in near- or
204: mid-infrared is 35. We estimate that the fraction of cool DAZs with detectable debris disks is 14\% (5 out of 35 stars).
205: Only 3 of the debris disks are warm enough to be detected in the K-band, and hence the fraction of K-band detectable
206: debris disks is $\sim$9\%.
207: These discoveries suggest a growing connection between cool DAZ white dwarfs and circumstellar debris disks.
208:
209: \subsection{Possible Trends}
210:
211: Figure 5 shows the calcium abundances in cool DAZ white dwarfs as a function of effective temperature from Berger et al. (2005).
212: Objects with IRTF near-infrared spectroscopy (filled circles), and Spitzer 4.5 and 8$\mu$m photometry (filled triangles; von Hippel
213: et al. 2006) are also shown. The rest of the objects from the Berger et al. (2005) sample are shown as stars. Objects with
214: circumstellar debris disks are marked with open circles.
215:
216: None of the six objects with $T_{\rm eff}>$16000 K that were observed at the IRTF and with Spitzer/IRAC show any excess emission
217: from warm debris disks. Even though we cannot rule out the existence of cool debris disks around these objects, their high metal
218: abundances require continuous, fairly high accretion rates from surrounding media (Koester et al. 2005; Koester \& Wilken 2006).
219: The diffusion timescales in a typical DAZ with 0.6$M_{\odot}$ and
220: $T_{\rm eff}\geq15000$ K are shorter than $\sim$3 days (Paquette et al. 1986). Photospheric metals in these stars have to be
221: replenished on a daily basis. If the metals were accreted from circumstellar debris disks, we should have been able to detect such
222: disks around these objects unless all six of them have optically thin, smaller, or edge on disks. Five of these warm DAZs are in
223: fact more metal rich than GD56 and G29-38.
224: Radiative levitation can explain the observed metal abundances in hotter white dwarfs, though it is predicted to be
225: insignificant below 20000 K.
226: %Heavy elements are not expected to be supported at these temperatures, but other physical
227: %processes such as accretion or mass loss may perturb the diffusive equilibrium and result in the observed calcium
228: %abundances (Dupuis 2003).
229:
230: All three white dwarfs with $T_{\rm eff}\sim 10000 - 15000$ and [Ca/H] $\geq-7.1$ have detectable debris disks around them. In addition,
231: WD1116+026 ($T_{\rm eff}=12200 K$ and [Ca/H]$=-7.3$) has a slight (questionable) K-band excess that can be explained by a cooler,
232: or more distant debris disk. Its calcium abundance is 2.5 times lower than that of G29-38, therefore unlike the warm DAZ stars
233: mentioned above, a cooler/distant debris disk can actually explain the lower metal abundance of WD1116+026.
234: There is only one more white dwarf satisfying the above $T_{\rm eff}$ and [Ca/H] criteria
235: in Berger et al. (2005) sample. WD1150-153 ($T_{\rm eff}=12800 K$
236: and [Ca/H]$=-6.7$) has more calcium than GD56 and G29-38, and therefore, it is likely to have a debris disk around it.
237: HE0106-3253 ($T_{\rm eff}=15700 K$ and [Ca/H]$=-6.4$) has surface temperature and calcium abundance similar to warm DAZ white dwarfs
238: without detectable debris disks. Spectroscopic or photometric observations of both of these objects are required
239: to search for excess flux in the infrared.
240:
241: We did not detect any near-infrared excesses from debris disks in our K band observations of DAZs with $T_{\rm eff}<14000$ and
242: [Ca/H] $<-7.5$. Using Spitzer/IRAC observations, von Hippel et al. (2006) found excess 4.5 and 8$\mu$m emission around a white
243: dwarf with $T_{\rm eff}=9700 K$ and [Ca/H] $=-$7.6.
244: This object is included in Figure 1 and has $J-H=0.11\pm0.06$ mag and $H-K=-0.03\pm0.08$ mag as measured by 2MASS.
245: Its 2MASS colors are consistent with the predicted colors for a 9700 K white dwarf.
246: Von Hippel et al. (2006) also observed a cooler DAZ white dwarf with $T_{\rm eff}=8619 K$ and two orders of magnitude smaller
247: calcium abundance and did not find any excess up to 8 $\mu$m.
248: The lack of infrared excess around this latter object does not mean that it does not have a debris disk, as it may have a
249: colder, more distant debris disk that would explain the lower calcium abundance and would show up at longer wavelengths.
250: Four out of 10 DAZs with $T_{\rm eff}$ = 9000 -- 15000 K and [Ca/H] $>$ -8 have debris disks detectable with the current
251: precision of our observations.
252:
253: \section{Conclusions}
254:
255: Our near-infrared spectroscopic observations of 20 cool DAZs resulted in the discovery of one more white dwarf with a
256: circumstellar debris disk. The observed $H$ and $K$-band excess around GD56 is similar to the infrared excess seen around
257: the previously known DAZs with circumstellar debris disks (G29-38 and GD362). Due to its $T_{\rm eff}$ and calcium abundance
258: (i.e. its position in Figure 5), we postulate that another DAZ white dwarf, WD1150-153, is likely to have a $K$-band detectable
259: circumstellar debris disk.
260:
261: The short lifetime of the hot dust (700--900 K) observed around several DAZ white dwarfs may suggest that the hot dust
262: comes from populations of colder, longer-lived reservoirs of comets or other debris that
263: are more massive than the hot dust clouds. Debris disks around main sequence stars often have excesses at 24$\mu$m, but hardly
264: ever at 8$\mu$m (e.g. Chen et al. 2005). DAZ white dwarfs may well behave the same way. The cool reservoir model (a cloud
265: of dust at $\sim$ 120 K) may be an example of the kind of dust cloud that the recent IRAC surveys could not detect around cool DAZs,
266: but a sensitive longer wavelength survey could.
267: The fraction of known single DAZs with near- or mid-infrared (up to 8$\mu$m) excesses is 14\%.
268: Mid-infrared photometry of more DAZs at longer wavelengths will likely bring this fraction up. Accretion from these debris
269: disks would also explain the photospheric metal abundances observed in DAZ white dwarfs.
270:
271: Our understanding of debris disks around white dwarfs will benefit greatly from mid-infrared spectroscopy.
272: $Spitzer$ spectroscopy of G29-38 revealed a silicate feature around this object suggesting a cometary or asteroidal origin for
273: the debris disk (Reach et al. 2005). Mid-infrared spectroscopy of GD56 along with the other debris disk white dwarfs will be
274: needed to check if all of them show silicate emission at 10 $\mu$m.
275: These observations will help our understanding of the formation and evolution of debris disks around white dwarfs.
276:
277: \acknowledgements
278: We would like to thank our referee, Jay Farihi, for helpful suggestions that greatly improved the article.
279: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant AST-0307315 and the NASA grant
280: NAG5-13094. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the
281: University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by
282: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
283:
284: \begin{thebibliography}{}
285: \bibitem[Alcock et al. (1986)]{alc86} Alcock, C., Fristrom, C. C., \& Siegelman, R. 1986, \apj, 302, 462
286: \bibitem[Becklin et al. (2005)]{bec05} Becklin, E. E. et al. 2005, \apj, 632, 119
287: \bibitem[Berger et al. (2005)]{ber05} Berger, L. et al. 2005, A\&A, in press, astro-ph/0509121
288: \bibitem[Bergeron et al. (1995)]{ber95} Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., \& Beauchamp, A. 1995, PASP, 107, 1047
289: \bibitem[Bergeron, Leggett, \& Ruiz (2001)]{ber01} Bergeron, P., Leggett, S. K. , \& Ruiz, M. T. 2001, \apjs, 133, 413
290: \bibitem[Chary et al. (1999)]{cha99} Chary, R., Zuckerman, B., \& Becklin, E. E. 1999, ESA SP-427, 289
291: \bibitem[Cushing, Vacca, \& Rayner (2004)]{cus04} Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., \& Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP 116, 362
292: \bibitem[Cushing, Rayner, \& Vacca (2005)]{cus05} Cushing, M. C., Rayner, J. T., \& Vacca, W. D. 2005, \apj, 623, 1115
293: \bibitem[Debes \& Sigurdsson 2002]{deb02} Debes, J. H. \& Sigurdsson, S. 2002, \apj, 572, 556
294: \bibitem[Dupuis et al. (1992)]{dup92} Dupuis, J., Fontaine, G., Pelletier, C., \& Wesemael, F. 1992, \apjs, 82, 505
295: %\bibitem[Dupuis (2003)]{dup03} Dupuis, J. 2003, FUSE Proposal, 907
296: \bibitem[Farihi \& Christopher (2004)]{far04} Farihi, J., \& Christopher, M. 2004, \aj, 128, 1868
297: \bibitem[Farihi et al. (2005)]{far05} Farihi, J., Becklin, E. E., Zuckerman, B. 2005, \apj, in press
298: \bibitem[Gianninas et al. (2004)]{gia04} Gianninas, A., Dufour, P., \& Bergeron, P. 2004, \apjl, 617, 57
299: \bibitem[Graham et al. (1990)]{gra90} Graham, J. R., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \& Soifer, B. T. 1990, \apj, 357, 216
300: \bibitem[Greenstein \& Liebert (1990)]{gre90} Greenstein, J. L. \& Liebert, J. W. 1990, \apj, 360, 662
301: \bibitem[Jura (2003)]{jur03} Jura, M. 2003, \apj, 584, 91
302: \bibitem[Kawka \& Vennes (2005)]{kaw05} Kawka, A. \& Vennes, S. 2005, 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 334, p.101
303: \bibitem[Kawka \& Vennes (2006)]{kaw06} Kawka, A. \& Vennes, S. 2006, \apj, in press
304: \bibitem[Kepler et al. (2005)]{kep05} Kepler, S. O. et al. 2005, \apj, 634, 1311
305: \bibitem[Kilic et al. (2005)]{kil05} Kilic, M., von Hippel, T., Leggett, S. K., \& Winget, D. E. 2005, \apj, 632, 115
306: \bibitem[Koester et al. (2005)]{koe05} Koester, D. et al. 2005, A\&A, 432, 1025
307: \bibitem[Koester \& Wilken (2006)]{koe06} Koester, D. \& Wilken, D. 2006, A\&A, in press
308: \bibitem[Leggett et al. (2002)]{leg02} Leggett, S. K. et al. 2002, \apj, 564, 452
309: \bibitem[Mullally et al. (2006)]{mul06} Mullally, F. et al. 2006, in preparation
310: \bibitem[Rayner et al. (2003)]{ray03} Rayner, J. T. et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 362
311: \bibitem[Reach et al. (2005)]{rea05} Reach, W. T. et al. 2005, \apjl, 635, 161
312: \bibitem[Vacca, Cushing, \& Rayner (2003)]{vac03} Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., \& Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP 115, 389
313: \bibitem[von Hippel et al. (2006)]{von06} Von Hippel, T. et al. 2006, in preparation
314: \bibitem[Winget et al. (2003)]{win03} Winget, D. E. et al. 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. 294: Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, 59
315: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Becklin (1987)]{zuc87} Zuckerman, B., \& Becklin, E. E. 1987, Nature, 300, 138
316: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al. (2003)]{zuc03} Zuckerman, B., Koester, D., Reid, I. N., \& Hunsch, M. 2003, \apj, 596, 477
317: \end{thebibliography}
318:
319: \clearpage
320: %TABLE1
321: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcrcrrrrr}
322: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
323: \tablecolumns{9}
324: \tablewidth{0pt}
325: \tablecaption{Near-Infrared Photometry of Cool DAZs}
326: \tablehead{
327: \colhead{Object}&
328: \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$(K)}&
329: \colhead{log $g$}&
330: \colhead{[Ca/H]}&
331: \colhead{$J_{2MASS}$}&
332: \colhead{$J-H_{2MASS}$}&
333: \colhead{$H-K_{2MASS}$}&
334: \colhead{$J-H_{IRTF}$}&
335: \colhead{$H-K_{IRTF}$}\\
336: & & & & $(mag)$ & $(mag)$ & $(mag)$ & $(mag)$ & $(mag)$
337: }
338: \startdata
339: WD0032$-$175& 9235& 8.0 & $-$10.2& 14.79 $\pm$ 0.04 &0.03 $\pm$ 0.08 & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.12 & 0.04 $\pm$ 0.04 & $-$0.02 $\pm$ 0.04\\
340: HS0047+1903& 16600 & 7.8 & $-$6.1 & 16.33 $\pm$ 0.11 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$0.10 $\pm$ 0.09 & $-$0.10 $\pm$ 0.15\\
341: WD0208+396& 7201& 7.9 & $-$8.8 & 13.83 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.17 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.03\\
342: WD0235+064& 11420 & 7.9 & $-$9.0 & 15.69 $\pm$ 0.07 & $-$0.22 $\pm$ 0.21 & \nodata & $-$0.05 $\pm$ 0.04 & $-$0.04 $\pm$ 0.08\\
343: WD0243$-$026& 6798 & 8.2 & $-$9.9 & 14.68 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.11 $\pm$ 0.10 & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.04\\
344: WD0245+541 & 5190 & 8.2 & $-$12.7 & 13.87 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.25 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.04\\
345: HS0307+0746& 10200 & 8.1 & $-$7.6 & 16.39 $\pm$ 0.14 & 0.36 $\pm$ 0.27 & \nodata & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.02 & $-$0.02 $\pm$ 0.02\\
346: WD0408$-$041 & 14400 & 7.8 & $-$7.1 & 15.87 $\pm$ 0.06 & $-$0.12 $\pm$ 0.14 & 0.55 $\pm$ 0.22 & 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.56 $\pm$ 0.04\\
347: G29-38 & 11600& 8.1 & $-$6.9 & 13.13 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.39 $\pm$ 0.04 &\nodata & \nodata \\
348: GD362 & 9740 & 9.1 &$-$5.2 &16.16 $\pm$ 0.09&\nodata &\nodata & 0.04 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.04 \\
349: WD0543+579 & 8142 & 8.0 & $-$10.3 & 15.52 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.15 & 0.11 $\pm$ 0.22 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.08 & $-$0.05 $\pm$ 0.12\\
350: WD0846+346 & 7373 & 8.0 & $-$9.4 & 15.89 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.13 & 0.18 $\pm$ 0.21 & 0.31 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.04\\
351: WD1015+161 & 19300 & 7.9 & $-$6.3 & 16.13 $\pm$ 0.09 &0.01 $\pm$ 0.24 & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.31 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.03\\
352: WD1116+026 & 12200 & 7.9 & $-$7.3 & 14.75 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.12 & $-$0.02 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.07\\
353: WD1858+393 & 9470 & 8.0 & $-$7.8 & 15.53 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.10 & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.17 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.03 & $-$0.03 $\pm$ 0.05\\
354: HS2132+0941 & 13200 & 7.7 & $-$7.7 & 16.09 $\pm$ 0.08 &0.12 $\pm$ 0.21 & \nodata & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.06 & $-$0.05 $\pm$ 0.09\\
355: WD2149+021 & 17300 & 7.9 & $-$7.6 & 13.20 $\pm$ 0.02 &$-$0.08 $\pm$ 0.04 & $-$0.11 $\pm$ 0.05 & $-$0.05 $\pm$ 0.03 & $-$0.06 $\pm$ 0.03\\
356: HE2221$-$1630& 10100 & 8.2 & $-$7.6 & 15.80 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.16 & $-$0.06 $\pm$ 0.14 & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.04\\
357: HS2229+2335 & 18600 & 7.9 & $-$6.3 & 16.16 $\pm$ 0.09 &\nodata &\nodata & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.08\\
358: HE2230$-$1230 & 20300 & 7.7 & $-$6.3 & 16.36 $\pm$ 0.11 & $-$0.08 $\pm$ 0.26 & \nodata & $-$0.09 $\pm$ 0.08 & $-$0.07 $\pm$ 0.12\\
359: \enddata
360: \tablecomments{$T_{\rm eff}$, log $g$, and [Ca/H] are from Berger et al. (2005) and Gianninas et al. (2004).}
361: \end{deluxetable}
362:
363: \clearpage
364: \begin{figure}
365: \plotone{f1.ps}
366: \caption{$J-H$ and $H-K$ 2MASS colors versus temperature for single DAZ white dwarfs studied by Berger et al. (2005;
367: open circles). The predicted sequences for DA (solid line) and DB (dashed line) white dwarfs and the colors for G29-38 and
368: GD362 (filled triangles) are also shown. GD56, a likely debris disk candidate from 2MASS photometry, is labeled.}
369: \end{figure}
370:
371:
372: \clearpage
373: \begin{figure}
374: \epsscale{1.5}
375: \plottwo{f2a.ps}{f2b.ps}
376: \caption{Flux calibrated spectra of the DAZ white dwarfs in our sample (black lines; ordered in $T_{\rm eff}$) compared to
377: models (red lines). }
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: \clearpage
381: \begin{figure}
382: \figurenum{2}
383: \epsscale{1.5}
384: \plottwo{f2c.ps}{f2d.ps}
385: \caption{cont.}
386: \end{figure}
387:
388: \clearpage
389: \begin{figure}
390: \epsscale{1.25}
391: \plottwo{f3a.ps}{f3b.ps}
392: \caption{
393: $J-H$ and $H-K$ color versus temperature and $J-H$ versus $H-K$ color-color diagrams for the observed DAZ stars.
394: The predicted sequences for DA (solid line) and DB (dashed line) white dwarfs are also shown. The
395: previously known white dwarfs with circumstellar debris disks (G29-38 and GD362) and the newly discovered white
396: dwarf with significant infrared excess (GD56) are labeled.}
397: \end{figure}
398:
399: \clearpage
400: \epsscale{1}
401: \begin{figure}
402: \plotone{f4.ps}
403: \caption{The IRTF spectra of the white dwarfs with circumstellar debris disks (black lines). The expected
404: near-infrared fluxes from each star (dashed line) and composite white dwarf + dust templates (red line, both blackbodies) are shown
405: in each panel. The top panel also shows a composite blackbody + L3 dwarf template for GD56 (green line).}
406: \end{figure}
407:
408: \begin{figure}
409: \plotone{f5.ps}
410: \caption{Calcium abundances versus effective temperatures for the objects observed at the IRTF (filled circles) and
411: Spitzer/IRAC (filled triangles; from Reach et al. 2005 and von Hippel et al. 2006). The rest of the DAZs
412: from Berger et al. (2005) are shown with star symbols. White dwarfs with circumstellar debris disks are
413: marked with open circles.}
414: \end{figure}
415:
416:
417: \end{document}
418: