1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \def\arcsecpoint{$''\!.$}
6: \def\arcminpoint{$'\!.$}
7: \def\deg{$^{\rm o}$}
8: \def\ltsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{<}{\sim}\;$}}
9: \def\gtsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{>}{\sim}\;$}}
10:
11: %\journalid{}{}
12: %\articleid{}{}
13:
14: %\slugcomment{submitted to {\it Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific }}
15:
16: \shortauthors{Dunn, et al.}
17: \shorttitle{Internet Database of UV Seyfert Lightcurves}
18:
19: \title{An Internet Database of Ultraviolet Lightcurves for Seyfert Galaxies}
20:
21: \author{Jay P. Dunn\altaffilmark{1,2},
22: Brian Jackson\altaffilmark{3},
23: Rajesh P. Deo\altaffilmark{1}
24: Chris Farrington\altaffilmark{1},
25: Varendra Das\altaffilmark{1},
26: \& D. Michael Crenshaw\altaffilmark{1}}
27:
28:
29: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University,
30: Atlanta, GA 30303}
31:
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Email: dunn@chara.gsu.edu}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Lunar \& Planetary Lab, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ
35: 85721}
36:
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39:
40: Using the Multimission Archives at Space Telescope (MAST), we have extracted
41: spectra and determined continuum light curves for 175 Seyfert Galaxies that
42: have been observed with the {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)}
43: and the Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS) on the {\it Hubble Space Telescope
44: (HST)}. To obtain the light curves as a function of Julian Date, we used fix bins
45: in the object's rest frame, and measured small regions (between 30 and 60 \AA)
46: of each spectrum's continuum flux in the range 1150 \AA\ to 3200 \AA. We provide
47: access to the UV light curves and other basic information about the observations
48: in tabular and graphical form via the Internet at
49: http://www.chara.gsu.edu/PEGA/IUE/.
50:
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: \keywords{galaxies: Seyfert -- ultraviolet: galaxies}
54:
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: Seyfert galaxies harbor Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) with typical redshifts
59: $z \lesssim$ 0.1 and moderate luminosities that vary over a range of
60: time scales from days to years and over a factor of $\sim$10 in amplitude.
61: AGN have supermassive black holes consuming nearby gas and/or stars;
62: the accretion disk surrounding the black hole is presumably the source for
63: their high apparent luminosity and continuum variability. Seyfert galaxies
64: are classified as types 1 and 2. Seyfert 1 galaxies have narrow ($\sim$500
65: km s$^{-1}$ full width half maximum [FWHM]) forbidden and permitted
66: emission lines and broad ($>$ 1000 km FWHM) permitted lines, while Seyfert 2
67: have only narrow permitted and forbidden emission lines. (Khachikian \&
68: Weedman 1974). Ultraviolet spectra of Seyfert galaxies are notable for their
69: strong continuum variability, which is not as pronounced in the visual regime
70: (e.g., NGC 4151, Kaspi et al. 1996).
71:
72: The {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)} began monitoring AGN in 1978
73: and collected a large number of UV spectra through 1995, while the Faint
74: Object Spectrograph (FOS) on board the {\it HST} collected spectra from 1990
75: through 1997. Although the origin of the UV continuum is still elusive, it is
76: currently believed that it is radiated from the accretion disk. Comparisons of
77: variability in the UV with other regions of the spectrum places important
78: constraints on the physics involved (e.g.,Nandra \& Papadakis 2001). Thus, it
79: is important to have a comprehensive and uniform database of UV light curves
80: for comparison with continuum observations at other wavelengths.
81:
82: From the massive collection of {\it IUE} and FOS spectra, we have compiled
83: continuum light curves and created a database that is internet accessible. Our
84: list of targets includes any object that has been designated a Seyfert Galaxy by the
85: observing astronomer for any observation with either {\it IUE} or {\it HST}. Also, we
86: have limited the selection list via redshift, including only objects with a redshift
87: z $<$ 0.2. Our database is the first effort to make AGN UV light curves readily
88: available via the World Wide Web. The only previous effort was an atlas of {\it IUE}
89: spectra of Seyfert Galaxies observed prior to 1991 January 1 (Courvoisier \&
90: Paltani 1992). The database we have created is inclusive of all {\it IUE} and FOS
91: spectra through their final years, and has the capability to receive further
92: observations provided by sources such as the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph
93: (GHRS), Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS), and the {\it Hopkins Ultraviolet
94: Telescope (HUT)}. This information should be helpful for a number of studies,
95: including those that require 1) the history of the UV continuum variations for an
96: individual Seyfert galaxy, 2) a comparison of UV fluxes with measurements in other
97: regimes of the electromagnetic spectrum for any given epoch, and 3) detailed
98: statistical analyses (e.g., cross-correlation,structure functions) of the UV
99: continuum properties of AGN.
100:
101: \section{Observations}
102:
103: \subsection{IUE}
104:
105: {\it IUE} was launched on 1978 January 26 and operated successfully until 30
106: September 1996, when it was decommissioned. {\it IUE} had the capability to
107: perform spectroscopy at two different resolutions. The high resolution mode
108: operated at a spectral resolution of 0.1 \AA\ to 0.3 \AA\ (FWHM), while the low
109: resolution mode performed at 6 \AA\ to 7 \AA\ (FWHM). {\it IUE} had two
110: apertures available for spectroscopy: large (10 x 20
111: arcsec) and small (3 arcsec in diameter). Due to the faintness of
112: Seyfert galaxies, the high-resolution mode is unsuitable for continuum studies.
113: Observations through the small aperture are unsuitable for absolute photometry
114: due to the large ($\sim$ 50\%) and variable light loss. Thus we used only
115: large-aperture, low-dispersion spectra for the light curves. {\it IUE} utilized
116: a total of four cameras:
117: the Long Wavelength Prime and Redundant Cameras (LWP and LWR) and the Short
118: Wavelength Prime and Redundant Cameras (SWP and SWR), which operated at 1850 \AA\
119: to 3200 \AA\ and 1150 \AA\ to 2000 \AA\ respectively. The SWR Camera was only
120: used for a handful of observations early on, and no useful data on Seyfert galaxies
121: were obtained. Both the LWP and LWR cameras were used to make observations over
122: the lifetime of {\it IUE}. During {\it IUE}'s early life the LWR camera
123: dominated the observing; during the later years the LWP camera become the
124: dominant camera due to a flare that developed in the LWR
125: \footnote {See http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/ for detailed information on the
126: {\it IUE} telescope and instruments}.
127:
128: \subsection{FOS}
129:
130: The FOS was one of the initial spectrographs installed
131: on the {\it HST}, which was launched in 1990. It remained on board Hubble until
132: 1997. There are two versions of the FOS data, pre-COSTAR and post-COSTAR,
133: corresponding to data obtained before and after the optics were repaired on
134: {\it HST} in 1994 January. The optics correction caused a slight change in the
135: aperture sizes, but there were no major effects on the quality of the data.
136: We chose to use data from all apertures, since aperture corrections for the FOS
137: are highly reliable. The FOS had two spectral resolutions available, high
138: ($\lambda$/$\Delta$$\lambda$
139: $\sim$1300) and low ($\lambda$/$\Delta$$\lambda$ $\sim$ 250). For our sample we
140: chose to use the high-resolution grating due to the short exposure times and
141: resulting poor signal-to-noise in the low resolution spectra. Although
142: the FOS gratings covered both the UV and visible regimes, we chose to use only
143: the UV data, from gratings G130H, G190H and G270H with wavelength ranges
144: spanning 1000 -- 1700 \AA\, 1700 -- 2200 \AA\ and 2200 -- 3000 \AA\ respectively
145: \footnote {See http://www.stecf.org/poa/FOS/ for detailed information on the
146: FOS}.
147:
148: \section{Data Reduction and Analysis}
149:
150: For our purposes, every available spectrum was obtained using the MAST
151: interface. The first objective was to create a single averaged spectrum per AGN
152: from a short list of viable candidates, to identify suitable continuum regions.
153: We chose NGC 5548, NGC 4151, Fairall 9 and Mrk 509, primarily due to their
154: numerous {\it IUE} observations (367, 984, 233, and 97 observations,
155: respectively). To view the common emission lines, the average spectra were
156: de-redshifted and plotted together, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. We determined
157: from the figures where continuum flux measurements were possible with little
158: chance of an emission or absorption line altering the flux measurements. The
159: best locations for the SWP camera measurements fell at 1355, 1720, and 1810 \AA\
160: with bin sizes of 30, 30, and 50 \AA, whereas the LWP/LWR camera bins fell at
161: 2200, 2400 and 2740 \AA\ with bin sizes of 50, 60 and 30 \AA, all in the rest
162: frame of the galaxy. Note that fluxes in the 2200 \AA\ bin are rather noisy
163: compared to the other bins, due to the low sensitivities of the cameras in
164: this region.
165:
166: Our next step was to remove flawed spectra from the sample. Several reasons arose
167: to eliminate an {\it IUE} spectrum from the light curve list. One such reason
168: was overexposure. The {\it IUE} cameras had a limited dynamic range, such that
169: the raw counts (in data numbers [DN]) could not exceed the value of 255.
170: Although in most cases only the emission lines were overexposed, we decided to
171: be cautious and not use overexposed images for our continuum measurements.
172: Another problem that appeared was heavy background noise during periods of {\it
173: IUE}'s orbit. As {\it IUE} orbited the Earth it would daily fall into the Van
174: Allen belts. These events would send background counts up to high levels,
175: thereby making the continuum fluxes very noisy. Low to moderate
176: background values turned out to be between 50 and 100 DN, above 100 DN was
177: considered a high value, and above 200 DN as unusable. To set a standard limit,
178: we have omitted any spectra with background $>$ 100 DN. During
179: {\it IUE}'s later years, sunlight leaked into the telescope and added an
180: extended source of light at wavelengths longer than 2500 \AA. All spectra
181: observed after 1990 that exhibited an unusually large increase in continuum
182: slope in the LWR and LWP images due to this effect were excluded from our light
183: curves. Other less prominent events affected the {\it IUE} spectra, but were
184: either rare or did not affect the continuum flux. We provide in our
185: web site a list of spectra for each object that were removed from our
186: measurements along with a key of explanations as to what events occurred to
187: exclude the spectra.
188:
189: Once we established a quality standard, we shifted our predetermined wavelength bins by 1+z
190: to measure the fluxes in the object's frame. For example, in NGC 4151 (z $=$ 0.0033) the SWP
191: bin positions shifted to 1359, 1725, and 1816 \AA. When redshifting a bin near the edge
192: of a spectrum, the 1810 bin in the SWP and the 2740 bin in the LWP camera would occasionally
193: fall off the spectrum and yield a null result. This occurance is the reason for a redshift
194: limit of z $<$ 0.2 in our selection list.
195:
196: As discussed previously, the FOS had three fixed grating ranges available. This
197: meant that unlike the {\it IUE} dataset, there was typically one bin in the
198: G130H (the 1355 \AA\ bin), three bins in the G190H (the 1720, 1810 and 2200 \AA\ bins)
199: and two bins in the G270H (the 2400 and 2740 \AA\ bins) spectra. When examining
200: light curves comprised of data from each source, it should be noted that the quality
201: of spectra for measurements in the 1355 and the 1720 bins on the FOS could be
202: vastly different, yet with {\it IUE} observations these two bins were obtained
203: at the same time and with the same camera and thus less likely to contain
204: deviations from one another.
205:
206: Once the measurements were made, we plotted the average flux in each bin versus the
207: Julian Date of the midpoint of each exposure, calculated from the start
208: time of the observation and the exposure length, which were taken from the file
209: header provided by MAST. In order to extend the time span in which objects
210: were monitored, we combined the light curves from FOS and {\it IUE}. An example
211: of these results is displayed for NGC 4151 in Figure 3, along with a "zoomed in"
212: section in Figure 4. In these light curves, it is obvious that over long time
213: frames (years) the flux can change by a factor of 10, as previously mentioned.
214: In Figure 4 it can be seen that small flux changes occurred over the course of
215: three days time in the intense monitoring campaign during this time period. This
216: is one of the few occasions in which the observations did not undersample
217: the continuum variations (Crenshaw et al. 1996).
218:
219: Continuum fluxes at the level of $\sim$2 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
220: cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$ or smaller are unreliable, due to camera artifacts and
221: uncertain background levels in the {\it IUE} cameras (Crenshaw et al.
222: 1990). Note that extended continuum sources, such as starbursts or scattering
223: regions often found in Seyfert 2 galaxies, could show apparent flux variability
224: due to the different aperture sizes used by {\it IUE} and the FOS.
225:
226:
227: \section{Error Analysis}
228:
229: In order to determine the uncertainties in the {\it IUE} fluxes, we began by
230: establishing the average of the continuum in each bin, illustrated by the
231: horizontal line in Figure 5, and then measured the standard deviation ($\sigma$)
232: of the points within the designated bins. This method for {\it IUE} error
233: determination is known to overestimate the uncertainties (Clavel et al. 1991).
234: Because the {\it IUE} cameras were not photon counters and the spectra were
235: highly oversampled, there are approximately 4 spectral points per wavelength
236: resolution element.
237:
238: For our measurements we concluded that a method of adjusting the error bars similar
239: to the method of Clavel et al. (1991) is optimal. On time scales less than
240: 1 -- 2 days, previous studies have shown that the UV continuum variations
241: in Seyfert galaxies are small (see Figure 4). Thus any apparent
242: continuum variablity exhibited on very short time scales in the {\it
243: IUE} data is likely dominated by photon and/or instrument noise.
244: To test this notion, we did combinatorics of all points in
245: each light curve, for several objects that contained at least tens of
246: observations, to find the fractional change in flux ($\Delta$f) and time
247: ($\Delta$t) between any two points (it should be noted that this is similar to a
248: structure function method). Figure 6 shows a plot of $\Delta$f against
249: ($\Delta$t) for each pair of points in Figure 3. As expected, as
250: the time interval grows, the maximum change in flux grows. The
251: leveling off of points on time intervals less than $\sim$1 day
252: confirms that there is no significant excess variability above the noise level
253: (with the exception of a few points) on short time scales.
254:
255: We took measurements of the light curve points contained within a rectangle between
256: log($\Delta$t/days) of -1.5 and -0.5 and between log($\Delta$f) of 0.0 and 0.15 in
257: Figure 6 to characterize the noise. We define the reproducibility R as the
258: average of the fractional variations in the time bin. R represents an upper
259: limit to the flux uncertainty (on average), since we cannot rule out the
260: possibility of small variations on these short time scales. The mean measured
261: error (EMean) is given by the average of all of the uncertainties ($\sigma$s)
262: in this time interval. The overestimation of the error is given by the ratio of
263: the mean measured error EMean and the reproducibility (R). Thus, if we
264: divide our individual $\sigma$'s by this ratio, we obtain an estimate of the
265: noise in each measurement, but scaled appropriately.
266:
267: We repeated the above procedure for a number of well-observed Seyfert galaxies.
268: In Tables 1, 2, and 3 we present the necessary data to determine the
269: overestimation of the error for each camera. MaxJD and MaxFl are the
270: logarithmic limits we imposed on the region of the plot of $\Delta$f vs.
271: $\Delta$jd to determine the reproducibility. Ratio is the average error
272: (EMean) divided by the reproducibility (R), or, in other words, the factor by
273: which the original errors have been overestimated. The reciprocal of the ratio
274: averaged over all objects gives the final scaling factor for theoriginal errors.
275: The average ratios are 1.69 $\pm$ 0.34, 2.40 $\pm$ 0.77, and 1.75 $\pm$ 0.31 for
276: the SWP, LWR, and LWP cameras respectively. For the FOS data, in the few
277: instances where we have multiple observations of an object over short time scales,
278: we see no evidence that the error bars require additional scaling.
279:
280: \section{Database and Website}
281:
282: We have created a web site to make our UV light curves of Seyfert
283: galaxies available to the community. Users can access our web site at
284: www.chara.gsu.edu/PEGA/IUE. We chose to create a MySQL database to store the
285: data and build our web site with Perl CGI scripts. The opening page is a
286: tabular list of the objects for which we have data, sorted by Right Ascension
287: (see Figure 7). Users can use their web browser's "find" function to locate
288: an object by name. The main page presents not only the list of objects and
289: positions, but their respective redshifts and a link to the light curve for
290: each bin that was measured (the central position of the bin is given in the
291: observed frame). For each link, we provide an on-the-fly light curve generator
292: (Figure 8). The user is able to adjust the time frame or the flux range
293: within the window to allow for a zoom. For each light curve, users can
294: left click on any point to access the observing information for that point.
295: We also provide a link to the information for all observations in the band
296: pass, as well as the light curve in tabular form (Julian Date, fluxes, and
297: scaled uncertainties) for downloading, as shown in Figure 9. This list
298: also gives the observations that were removed from the light curve, if any. From
299: this page, users are also able to access previews of the original spectra on the
300: MAST web site. In the future, we hope to add points to the light curves from
301: other UV spectrographs, such as GHRS, STIS, and {\it HUT}.
302:
303: \acknowledgments
304:
305: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which
306: is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
307: Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
308: Administration. All of the data presented in this paper were obtained
309: from the Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).
310: Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space
311: Science via grant NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
312:
313: \clearpage
314: \begin{references}
315:
316: \reference{cla1991}Clavel, J. et al. 1991, \apj, 366, 64
317:
318: \reference{cou1992}Courvoisier, T.J.-L., \& Paltani, S. 1992, IUE-ULDA Access Guide no. 4
319:
320: \reference{cren1996}Crenshaw, D. M. et al. 1996, \apj, 470, 322C
321:
322: \reference{cren1990}Crenshaw, D.M., Bruegman, O.W., \& Norman, D.J. 1990, PASP, 102, 463
323:
324: \reference{kach1974}Kachikian \& Weedman 1974, \apj, 192, 581K
325:
326: \reference{kas1996}Kaspi, S. et al. 1996, \apj, 470, 336
327:
328: \reference{nan2001}Nandra, K. \& Papadakis, I.E. 2001, \apj, 554, 710
329:
330: \end{references}
331:
332: \clearpage
333:
334: \figcaption[fg1.eps]{Plots of {\it IUE} SWP spectra for four frequently
335: observed Seyfert galaxies in each object's rest frame to determine the best
336: locations and sizes for bin measurements. These are average spectra from all of
337: the good-quality spectra provided by MAST. The bin locations and widths used for
338: determining the light curves are shown.}
339:
340: \figcaption[fg2.eps]{Plot of average LWP spectra for the same four Seyfert galaxies
341: as in Figure 1. Bin locations and widths are indicated.}
342:
343: \figcaption[fg3.eps]{Example light curve plot of the 1355 bin for NGC 4151.
344: This particular light curve shows an excellent example of large scale changes in
345: flux over significant periods of time.}
346:
347: \figcaption[fg4.eps]{Zoomed version of Figure 3. Error bars are not shown for
348: clarity.}
349:
350: \figcaption[fg5.eps]{Example of the 1355 bin with the SWP camera for NGC 4151,
351: zoomed to show the average flux within the bin. The error calculated is
352: the standard deviation of the observed points from that average flux.}
353:
354: \figcaption[fg6.eps]{Plot of the change in flux versus the change in time for NGC 4151.}
355:
356: \figcaption[fg7.eps]{Sample image of web site home page.}
357:
358: \figcaption[fg8.eps]{Sample image of the light curve on-the-fly generator.}
359:
360: \figcaption[fg9.eps]{Sample of the light curve information page.}
361:
362: \clearpage
363: \begin{figure}
364: \plotone{fg1.eps}
365: \\Fig.~1.
366: \end{figure}
367:
368: \clearpage
369: \begin{figure}
370: \plotone{fg2.eps}
371: \\Fig.~2.
372: \end{figure}
373:
374: \clearpage
375: \begin{figure}
376: \plotone{fg3.eps}
377: \\Fig.~3.
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: \clearpage
381: \begin{figure}
382: \plotone{fg4.eps}
383: \\Fig.~4.
384: \end{figure}
385:
386: \clearpage
387: \begin{figure}
388: \plotone{fg5.eps}
389: \\Fig.~5.
390: \end{figure}
391:
392: \clearpage
393: \begin{figure}
394: \plotone{fg6.eps}
395: \\Fig.~6.
396: \end{figure}
397:
398: \clearpage
399: \begin{figure}
400: \plotone{fg7.eps}
401: \\Fig.~7.
402: \end{figure}
403:
404: \clearpage
405: \begin{figure}
406: \plotone{fg8.eps}
407: \\Fig.~8.
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: \clearpage
411: \begin{figure}
412: \plotone{fg9.eps}
413: \\Fig.~9.
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \newpage
417: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
418: \tablecolumns{7}
419: \footnotesize
420: \tablecaption{Error Analysis of {\it IUE} data for Seyfert Galaxies (SWP)}
421: %\tablewidth{Opt}
422: \tablehead{
423: \colhead{Object} &
424: \colhead{$\sigma$} &
425: \colhead{Log Max JD} &
426: \colhead{Log Max Fl} &
427: \colhead{R} &
428: \colhead{E Mean} &
429: \colhead{Ratio}
430: }
431: \startdata
432: NGC4151 & 0.026 & -0.50 & 0.15 & 0.032 & 0.067 & 2.06 \\
433: NGC7469 & 0.037 & -0.50 & 0.20 & 0.045 & 0.076 & 1.67 \\
434: NGC3783 & 0.052 & 0.00 & 0.30 & 0.054 & 0.073 & 1.36 \\
435: NGC3516 & 0.039 & 0.20 & 0.15 & 0.046 & 0.081 & 1.76 \\
436: NGC5548 & 0.041 & 0.25 & 0.15 & 0.048 & 0.085 & 1.78 \\
437: Fairall9 & 0.040 & 0.25 & 0.15 & 0.057 & 0.099 & 1.74 \\
438: 3c390.3 & 0.129 & 1.50 & 0.50 & 0.222 & 0.272 & 1.22 \\
439: Mrk509 & 0.031 & 0.75 & 0.20 & 0.040 & 0.080 & 1.99 \\
440: Mrk335 & 0.076 & 1.00 & 0.30 & 0.091 & 0.099 & 1.09 \\
441: NGC4593 & 0.107 & 1.00 & 0.50 & 0.129 & 0.115 & 0.89 \\
442: Rxj 2304.7-0841 & 0.096 & 1.50 & 0.50 & 0.114 & 0.150 & 1.32 \\
443: \enddata
444: \normalsize
445: \end{deluxetable}
446:
447: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
448: \tablecolumns{7}
449: \footnotesize
450: \tablecaption{Error Analysis of {\it IUE} data for Seyfert Galaxies (LWR)}
451: %\tablewidth{Opt}
452: \tablehead{
453: \colhead{Object} &
454: \colhead{$\sigma$} &
455: \colhead{Log Max JD} &
456: \colhead{Log Max Fl} &
457: \colhead{R} &
458: \colhead{E Mean} &
459: \colhead{Ratio}
460: }
461: \startdata
462: NGC4151 & 0.022 & -0.50 & 0.15 & 0.030 & 0.103 & 3.43 \\
463: NGC7469 & 0.007 & 1.50 & 0.20 & 0.054 & 0.082 & 1.52 \\
464: NGC3783 & 0.474 & 0.50 & 0.15 & 0.072 & 0.109 & 1.51 \\
465: NGC3516 & 0.555 & 2.30 & 0.20 & 0.078 & 0.102 & 1.31 \\
466: NGC5548 & 0.031 & 1.50 & 0.15 & 0.064 & 0.164 & 2.56 \\
467: Fairall9 & 0.022 & 1.00 & 0.10 & 0.034 & 0.099 & 2.91 \\
468: 3c390.3 & 0.057 & 2.50 & 0.20 & 0.073 & 0.214 & 2.93 \\
469: Rxj 2304.7-0841 & 0.032 & 2.00 & 0.20 & 0.037 & 0.111 & 3.00 \\
470: \enddata
471: \normalsize
472: \end{deluxetable}
473:
474: \newpage
475: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
476: \tablecolumns{7}
477: \footnotesize
478: \tablecaption{Error Analysis of {\it IUE} data for Seyfert Galaxies (LWP)}
479: %\tablewidth{Opt}
480: \tablehead{
481: \colhead{Object} &
482: \colhead{$\sigma$} &
483: \colhead{Log Max JD} &
484: \colhead{Log Max Fl} &
485: \colhead{R} &
486: \colhead{E Mean} &
487: \colhead{Ratio}
488: }
489: \startdata
490: NGC4151 & 0.022 & -1.00 & 0.15 & 0.028 & 0.050 & 1.78 \\
491: NGC3783 & 0.039 & 0.00 & 0.15 & 0.032 & 0.043 & 1.34 \\
492: NGC5548 & 0.062 & 0.50 & 0.25 & 0.064 & 0.088 & 1.38 \\
493: Fairall9 & 0.027 & 0.00 & 1.00 & 0.028 & 0.058 & 2.07 \\
494: 3c390.3 & 0.027 & 1.70 & 1.20 & 0.056 & 0.120 & 2.14 \\
495: Mrk335 & 0.036 & 1.00 & 0.10 & 0.049 & 0.087 & 1.78 \\
496: \enddata
497: \normalsize
498: \end{deluxetable}
499:
500: \end{document}
501: