1: \documentclass[aps,onecolumn,12pt,nofootinbib,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{psfrag}
3: %remove the line below before submitting to arXiv
4: %\setlength{\topmargin}{0.5cm}
5: \begin{document}
6: \begin{flushright}
7: \vspace*{-1.5cm}
8: BA-06-12\\
9: %\today
10: % (Comments: )
11: \end{flushright}
12: \vspace{-.1cm}
13: \title{Coleman-Weinberg Potential In Good Agreement With WMAP}
14: \author{Q. Shafi} \email{shafi@bartol.udel.edu}
15: \author{V. N. {\c S}eno$\breve{\textrm{g}}$uz} \email{nefer@udel.edu}
16: \affiliation{Bartol Research Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
17: 19716, USA}
18: \begin{abstract}
19: We briefly summarize and update a class of inflationary models from the early
20: eighties based on a quartic (Coleman-Weinberg) potential for a gauge
21: singlet scalar (inflaton) field.
22: For vacuum energy scales comparable to the grand unification scale,
23: the scalar spectral index $n_s\simeq0.94$--$0.97$, in very good agreement with the
24: WMAP three year results.
25: The tensor to scalar ratio $r\lesssim0.14$ while
26: $\alpha\equiv{\rm d}n_s/{\rm d}\ln k$ is $\simeq-10^{-3}$.
27: An $SO(10)$ version naturally explains the observed baryon asymmetry via non-thermal leptogenesis.
28: \end{abstract}
29: \pacs{98.80.Cq}
30: \maketitle
31:
32: An inflationary scenario \cite{Guth:1980zm,Linde:1981mu}
33: may be termed successful if it satisfies the following criteria:
34:
35: 1) The total number of $e$-folds N during inflation is large enough to resolve the
36: horizon and flatness problems. Thus, $N\gtrsim$50--60, but
37: it can be somewhat smaller for low scale inflation.
38:
39: 2) The predictions are consistent with observations of the microwave
40: background and large scale structure formation. In particular,
41: the predictions for $n_s$, $r$ and $\alpha$ should be consistent with the
42: most recent WMAP results \cite{Spergel:2006hy} (see also \cite{Alabidi:2006qa} for
43: a brief survey of models).
44:
45: 3) Satisfactory resolution of the monopole problem in grand unified
46: theories (GUTs) is achieved.
47:
48: 4) Explanation of the origin of the observed baryon asymmetry is provided.
49:
50: In this report we review a class of inflation models which appeared in the
51: early eighties in the framework of non-supersymmetric GUTs and employed a GUT singlet scalar field
52: $\phi$ \cite{Shafi:1983bd,Pi:1984pv,Lazarides:1984pq}.
53: These (Shafi-Vilenkin) models satisfy, as we will see, the above criteria and are based on a
54: Coleman-Weinberg (CW) potential \cite{Coleman:1973jx}
55: \begin{equation}
56: V(\phi)= V_0 + A \phi^4 \left[\ln\left(\frac{\phi^2}{M_*^2}\right) + C\right]
57: \end{equation}
58: where, following \cite{Shafi:1983bd} the renormalization mass $M_* = 10^{ 18}$ GeV and
59: $V_0 ^{1/4}$ will specify the vacuum energy. The value of $C$ is fixed to cancel the cosmological
60: constant at the minimum. It is convenient to choose a physically
61: equivalent parametrization for $V(\phi)$ \cite{Albrecht:1984qt,Linde:2005ht}, namely
62: \begin{equation} \label{pot}
63: V(\phi)= A \phi^4 \left[\ln\left( \frac{\phi}{M}\right) -\frac{1}{4}\right] + \frac{A M^4}{4}\,,
64: \end{equation}
65: where $M$ denotes the $\phi$ VEV at the minimum. Note that $V(\phi=M)=0$,
66: and the vacuum energy density at the origin is given by
67: $V_0 = A M^4 /4$.
68:
69: The potential above is typical for the new inflation scenario \cite{Linde:1981mu},
70: where inflation takes place near the maximum.
71: However, as we discuss below,
72: depending on the value of $V_0$, the inflaton
73: can have small or large values compared to the Planck scale during observable inflation.
74: In the latter case observable inflation takes place near the minimum and the
75: model mimics chaotic inflation \cite{Linde:1983gd}.
76:
77: The original new inflation models attempted to explain the initial value of the inflaton through high-temperature
78: corrections to the potential. This mechanism does not work unless the inflaton is somewhat small
79: compared to the Planck scale at the Planck epoch \cite{Linde:2005ht}. However, the initial value of the
80: inflaton could also be suppressed by a pre-inflationary phase. Here we will simply assume that the
81: initial value of the inflaton is sufficiently small to allow enough $e$-folds.
82:
83: The slow-roll parameters may be defined as \cite{Liddle:1992wi}
84: \begin{equation}
85: \epsilon =
86: \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{V'}{V}\right)^2 \,,\quad
87: \eta=\left(\frac{V''}{V}\right) \,,\quad
88: \xi^2=\left(\frac{V'\, V'''}{V^2}\right) \,.
89: \end{equation}
90: (Here and below we use units $m_P=1$, where $m_P\simeq2.4\times10^{18}$ GeV
91: is the reduced Planck mass.)
92: The slow-roll approximation is valid if the slow-roll conditions
93: $\epsilon \ll 1$ and $\eta \ll 1$ hold.
94: In this case the spectral index
95: $n_\mathrm{s}$, the tensor-to-scalar ratio
96: $r$ and the running of the spectral index
97: $\alpha\equiv\mathrm{d} n_\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{d} \ln k$ are given by
98: \begin{eqnarray}
99: n_\mathrm{s} \!&\simeq&\! 1 - 6 \epsilon + 2 \eta \label{ns}\\
100: r \!&\simeq&\! 16 \epsilon \\
101: \alpha \!\!&\simeq&\!\!
102: 16 \epsilon \eta - 24 \epsilon^2 - 2 \xi^2.
103: \end{eqnarray}
104:
105: The number of $e$-folds after the comoving scale $l_0=2\pi/k_0$ has crossed the horizon is
106: given by
107: \begin{equation} \label{efold1}
108: N_0=\frac{1}{2}\int^{\phi_0}_{\phi_e}\frac{H(\phi)\rm{d}\phi}{H'(\phi)} \end{equation}
109: where $\phi_0$ is the value of the field when the scale corresponding to $k_0$
110: exits the horizon and $\phi_e$ is the value of the field at the end of inflation.
111: This value is given by the condition $2(H'(\phi)/H(\phi))^2=1$, which can be calculated
112: from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation \cite{Salopek:1990jq}
113: \begin{equation}
114: [H'(\phi)]^2-\frac{3}{2}H^2(\phi)=-\frac{1}{2}V(\phi)\,.
115: \end{equation}
116: The amplitude of the curvature perturbation $\mathcal{P^{{\rm 1/2}}_R}$ is given by
117: \begin{equation} \label{perturb}
118: \mathcal{P^{{\rm 1/2}}_R}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}\pi }\frac{V^{3/2}}{|V'|}\,.
119: \end{equation}
120: To calculate the magnitude of $A$ and the inflationary parameters, we use these standard
121: equations above. We also include the first order corrections in the slow roll expansion
122: for $\mathcal{P^{{\rm 1/2}}_R}$ and the spectral index $n_s$ \cite{Stewart:1993bc}.\footnote{The
123: fractional error in $\mathcal{P^{{\rm 1/2}}_R}$ from the slow
124: roll approximation is of order $\epsilon$ and $\eta$ (assuming these parameters remain $\ll1$).
125: This leads to an error in $n_s$ of order $\xi^2$, which is $\sim10^{-3}$ in the present model.
126: Comparing to the WMAP errors, this precision seems quite adequate.
127: However, in anticipation of the Planck mission, it may be desirable
128: to consider improvements.}
129: The WMAP value for $\mathcal{P^{{\rm 1/2}}_R}$ is $4.86\times10^{-5}$ for $k_0 = 0.002$ Mpc$^{-1}$.
130: $N_0$ corresponding to the same scale is $\simeq53+(2/3)\ln(V(\phi_0) ^{1/4}/10^{15}\ \rm{GeV})+(1/3)\ln(T_r/10^{9}\ \rm{GeV})$.
131: (The expression for $N_0$ assumes a standard thermal history \cite{Dodelson:2003vq}. See \cite{Lyth:1998xn} for reviews.)
132: We assume reheating is efficient enough such that $T_r=m_{\phi}$, where the mass of the inflaton
133: $m_{\phi}=2\sqrt{A}M$. In practice, we expect $T_r$ to be somewhat below $m_{\phi}$ \cite{Shafi:1983bd}.
134:
135: In Table I and Fig. \ref{figgg} we display the predictions for $n_s$, $\alpha$ and $r$, with
136: the vacuum energy scale $V_0 ^{1/4}$ varying from $10^{13}$ GeV to $10^{17}$ GeV.
137: The parameters have a slight dependence on the reheat temperature, as can be seen from
138: the expression for $N_0$. As an example, if we assume instant reheating ($T_r\simeq V(\phi_0)^{1/4}$),
139: $n_s$ would increase to 0.941 and 0.943 for $V_0^{1/4} =10^{13}$ GeV and $V_0^{1/4} =10^{15}$ GeV respectively.
140:
141: \begin{table}[t]
142: {\centering
143: \caption{The inflationary parameters for the Shafi-Vilenkin model with the potential in Eq. (\ref{pot})
144: ($m_P=1$)} \label{tablo}
145: \resizebox{!}{3.72cm}{
146: \begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r@{\hspace{.5cm}}r}
147: \hline \hline
148: $V^{1/4}_0$(GeV) & $A(10^{-14})$ & M & $\phi_e$ & $\phi_0$ & $V(\phi_0)^{1/4}$(GeV) & $n_s$ & $\alpha(-10^{-3})$ & $r$ \\
149: \hline
150: $10^{13}$ & 1.0 & 0.018 & 0.010 & $3.0\times10^{-6}$ &$\approx V_0^{1/4}$ &0.938 & 1.4 & $9\times10^{-15}$ \\
151: \hline
152: $5\times10^{13}$ & 1.2 & 0.088 & 0.050 & $7.5\times10^{-5}$ &$\approx V_0^{1/4}$ &0.940 & 1.3 & $5\times10^{-12}$ \\
153: \hline
154: $10^{14}$ & 1.3 & 0.17 & 0.10 & $3.0\times10^{-4}$ &$\approx V_0^{1/4}$ &0.940 & 1.2 & $9\times10^{-11}$ \\
155: \hline
156: $5\times10^{14}$ & 1.9 & 0.79 & 0.51 & $7.5\times10^{-3}$ & $\approx V_0^{1/4}$&0.941 & 1.2 & $5\times10^{-8}$ \\
157: \hline
158: $10^{15}$ & 2.3 & 1.5 & 1.1 & 0.030 &$\approx V_0^{1/4}$ &0.941 & 1.2 & $9\times10^{-7}$ \\
159: \hline
160: $5\times10^{15}$ & 4.8 & 6.2 & 5.1 & 0.71 & $\approx V_0^{1/4}$&0.942 & 1.0 & $5\times10^{-4}$ \\
161: \hline
162: $10^{16}$ & 5.2 & 12 & 10 & 3.2 & $9.9\times10^{15}$ & 0.952 & 1.0 & $8\times10^{-3}$ \\
163: \hline
164: $2\times10^{16}$ & 1.1 & 36 &35 & 23 &$1.7\times10^{16}$ &0.966 & 0.6 & $0.07$ \\
165: \hline
166: $3\times10^{16}$ & .17 & 86 & 85 & 72&$1.9\times10^{16}$ &0.967 & 0.6 & $0.11$ \\
167: \hline
168: $10^{17}$ & .001 & 1035 & 1034 & 1020&$2.0\times10^{16}$ &0.966 & 0.6 & $0.14$ \\
169: \hline \hline
170: \end{tabular} }
171: \par} \centering
172: \end{table}
173:
174: \begin{figure}[thb]
175: \psfrag{1-n}{\scriptsize{$1-n_s$}}
176: \psfrag{r}{\scriptsize{$r$}}
177: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=8cm]{colfiga.eps}
178: \vspace{-.5cm}
179: \caption{$1-n_s$ and $r$ vs. $\log[V^{1/4}_0{\,\rm(GeV)}]$ for the potential in Eq. (\ref{pot}).} \label{figgg}
180: \end{figure}
181:
182: For $V_0^{1/4}\lesssim10^{16}$ GeV, the inflaton field remains smaller than the Planck scale,
183: and the inflationary parameters are
184: similar to those for new inflation models with $V=V_0(1-(\phi/\mu)^4)$: $n_s\simeq1-(3/N_0)$,
185: $\alpha\simeq (n_s-1)/N_0$.
186: As the vacuum energy is lowered, $N_0$ becomes smaller and
187: $n_s$ deviates further from unity. However, $n_s$ remains within $2\sigma$ of the WMAP
188: best fit value (for negligible $r$) $0.951^{0.015}_{-0.019}$ \cite{Spergel:2006hy}
189: even for $V_0^{1/4}$ as low as $10^5$ GeV. Inflation
190: with CW potential at low scales is discussed in Ref. \cite{Knox:1992iy}.
191:
192: For $V_0^{1/4}\gtrsim10^{16}$ GeV, the inflaton is larger than the Planck scale
193: during observable inflation. Observable inflation then occurs closer to the minimum
194: where the potential is effectively $V=(1/2) m_{\phi}^2 \Delta\phi^2$,
195: $\Delta\phi=M-\phi$ denoting the deviation of the field from the minimum.
196: This well-known monomial model \cite{Linde:1983gd} predicts $m_{\phi}\simeq2\times10^{13}$ GeV and
197: $\Delta\phi_0\simeq2\sqrt{N_0}$, corresponding to $V(\phi_0)\simeq(2\times10^{16}$ GeV$)^4$.
198: For the $\phi^2$ potential to be a good approximation, $V_0$ must be greater than
199: this value. Then the inflationary parameters no longer depend on $V_0$ and
200: approach the predictions for the $\phi^2$ potential.
201:
202: \begin{figure}[thb]
203: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=8cm]{nvsr.eps}
204: \vspace{-.5cm}
205: \caption{$r$ vs. $n_s$ for the potential in Eq. (\ref{pot}).} \label{fig:222}
206: \end{figure}
207:
208: \begin{figure}[thb]
209: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=8cm]{alpha3.eps}
210: \vspace{-.5cm}
211: \caption{$\alpha$ vs. $n_s$ for the potential in Eq. (\ref{pot}).} \label{fig:2222}
212: \end{figure}
213:
214: The tensor to scalar ratio $r$ versus the spectral index $n_s$ is displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:222}.
215: The values are in very good agreement with the recent WMAP results
216: (see Fig. 14 of Ref. \cite{Spergel:2006hy}).
217: The running of the spectral index is negligible, as in most inflation models (Fig. \ref{fig:2222}).
218: Note that the WMAP data favor a large running spectral index.
219: This is an important result if confirmed but currently has little statistical
220: significance.
221:
222: In the context of non-supersymmetric GUTs, $V_0^{1/4}$ is related to the unification
223: scale, and is typically a factor of 3--4 smaller than the superheavy gauge boson masses
224: due to the loop factor in the CW potential.
225: The unification scale for non-supersymmetric GUTs is typically $10^{14}$--$10^{15}$
226: GeV, although it is possible to have higher scales, for instance associating
227: inflation with $SO(10)$ breaking via $SU(5)$.
228:
229: The reader may worry about proton decay with gauge boson masses of order
230: $10^{14}$--$10^{15}$ GeV.
231: In the $SU(5)$ model \cite{Georgi:1974sy}, in particular, a two-loop
232: renormalization group analysis of the standard model gauge couplings yields
233: masses for the superheavy gauge bosons of order $1\times10^{14}$--$5\times10^{14}$ GeV
234: \cite{Dorsner:2005ii}. This is consistent with the SuperK proton lifetime limits \cite{Eidelman:2004wy},
235: provided one assumes strong flavor suppression of the relevant dimension six
236: gauge mediated proton decay coefficients.
237: If no suppression is assumed the gauge boson masses should have masses
238: close to $10^{15}$ GeV or higher \cite{Ilia}.
239:
240: For the Shafi-Vilenkin model
241: in $SU(5)$, the tree level scalar potential
242: contains the term $(1/2)\lambda\phi^2{\rm Tr}\Phi^2$ with $\Phi$ being the Higgs adjoint,
243: and $A\sim1.5\times10^{-2}\lambda^2$ \cite{Shafi:1983bd,Linde:2005ht}. Inflation requires
244: $A\sim10^{-14}$, corresponding to $\lambda\sim10^{-6}$.
245:
246: This model has been extended to $SO(10)$
247: in Ref. \cite{Lazarides:1984pq}. The breaking of $SO(10)$ to the standard model proceeds, for
248: example, via the subgroup $G_{422} = SU(4)_c \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ \cite{Pati:1974yy}. A renormalization
249: group analysis shows that the symmetry breaking scale for $SO(10)$ is of order $10^{15}$
250: GeV, while $G_{422}$ breaks at an intermediate scale $M_I\sim 10^{12}$ GeV
251: \cite{Rajpoot:1980xy}. (This is
252: intriguingly close to the scale needed to resolve the strong CP problem and
253: produce cold dark matter axions.)
254: The predictions for $n_s$, $\alpha$ and $r$ are essentially identical
255: to the SU(5) case. There is one amusing consequence though which may be worth
256: mentioning here. The monopoles associated with the breaking of $SO(10)$ to $G_{422}$
257: are inflated away. However, the breaking of $G_{422}$ to
258: the SM gauge symmetry yields doubly charged monopoles \cite{Lazarides:1980cc}, whose mass is
259: of order $10^{13}$ GeV. These may be present in our galaxy at a flux level of
260: $10^{-16}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$ \cite{Lazarides:1984pq}.
261:
262: As stated earlier, before an inflationary model can be deemed successful, it must contain
263: a mechanism for generating the observed baryon asymmetry in the universe. In
264: the $SU(5)$ case the color higgs triplets produced by the
265: inflaton decay can generate the baryon asymmetry, provided the higgs sector of
266: the model has the required amount of CP violation \cite{Shafi:1983bd}.
267:
268: The discovery of neutrino oscillations requires that we introduce SU(5)
269: singlet right handed neutrinos, presumably three of them, to implement
270: the seesaw mechanism and generate the desired masses for the light
271: neutrinos. In this case it is natural to generate the observed baryon
272: asymmetry via leptogenesis \cite{Fukugita:1986hr} (for non-thermal leptogenesis see Ref. \cite{Lazarides:1991wu})
273: by introducing the couplings
274: $N_i N_j \phi^2 / m_P$,
275: where $N_i$ (i=1,2,3) denote the right handed neutrinos, and the renormalizable
276: coupling to $\phi$ is absent because of the assumed discrete
277: symmetry. By suitably adjusting the Yukawa coefficients one can arrange
278: that the $\phi$ field decays into the right handed neutrinos.
279: Note that the presence of the above Yukawa couplings then allows one
280: to make the color triplets heavier, of order $10^{14}$ GeV, thereby avoiding
281: any potential conflict with proton decay. In the $SO(10)$ model,
282: leptogenesis is almost automatic \cite{Lazarides:1984pq}.
283:
284: Finally, it is worth noting that new inflation models have also been
285: considered in the framework of supersymmetric GUTs, taking account of
286: supergravity corrections. In Ref. \cite{Senoguz:2004ky}, for instance, it is
287: shown that the spectral index $n_s$ is less than 0.98, with values between
288: 0.94 and 0.96 plausible. Furthermore, reheat temperatures as low
289: as $10^4$--$10^6$ GeV can be realized to satisfy the gravitino constraint.
290: In these models the tensor to scalar ratio $r$ is
291: tiny, of order $10^{-3}$ or less, and $\alpha\sim-10^{-3}$.
292:
293: To summarize, we have briefly reviewed and updated a class of realistic
294: inflation models based on a quartic CW potential for a gauge singlet
295: inflaton field. We find very good agreement between the model
296: predictions and the three year WMAP data. An interesting feature
297: is the observation that if the vacuum energy that drives inflation
298: exceeds $10^{16}$ GeV, the inflaton during observable inflation exceeds
299: the Planck mass in value. As a consequence, there is transition
300: from new to chaotic inflation (or more precisely the monomial potential model),
301: and the scalar spectral index and $r$ acquire limiting values of $0.966$ and $0.14$ respectively.
302:
303: \subsection*{Acknowledgements}
304: This work is partially supported by the US Department of Energy under contract number DE-FG02-91ER40626 (Q.S. and V.N.S.),
305: and by a University of Delaware graduate fellowship (V.N.S.).
306:
307: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev.bst} \bibliography{bebop.bib}
308:
309: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
310: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
311: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
312: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
313: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
314: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
315: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
316: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
317: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
318: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
319: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
320: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
321: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
322:
323: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Guth}(1981)}]{Guth:1980zm}
324: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~H.} \bibnamefont{Guth}},
325: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D23}},
326: \bibinfo{pages}{347} (\bibinfo{year}{1981}).
327:
328: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Linde}(1982)}]{Linde:1981mu}
329: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~D.} \bibnamefont{Linde}},
330: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B108}},
331: \bibinfo{pages}{389} (\bibinfo{year}{1982});
332: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Albrecht and Steinhardt}(1982)}]{Albrecht:1982wi}
333: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Albrecht}} \bibnamefont{and}
334: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~J.} \bibnamefont{Steinhardt}},
335: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{48}},
336: \bibinfo{pages}{1220} (\bibinfo{year}{1982}).
337:
338: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Spergel et~al.}(2006)}]{Spergel:2006hy}
339: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~N.} \bibnamefont{Spergel}}
340: \bibnamefont{et~al.} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0603449}.
341:
342: %\cite{Alabidi:2006qa}
343: \bibitem{Alabidi:2006qa}
344: L.~Alabidi and D.~H.~Lyth,
345: %``Inflation models after WMAP year three,''
346: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0603539}.
347: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603539;%%
348:
349: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Shafi and Vilenkin}(1984{\natexlab{a}})}]{Shafi:1983bd}
350: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}} \bibnamefont{and}
351: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Vilenkin}},
352: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{52}},
353: \bibinfo{pages}{691} (\bibinfo{year}{1984}{\natexlab{a}}).
354:
355: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pi}(1984)}]{Pi:1984pv}
356: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.-Y.} \bibnamefont{Pi}},
357: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{52}},
358: \bibinfo{pages}{1725} (\bibinfo{year}{1984});
359: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Shafi and Vilenkin}(1984{\natexlab{b}})}]{Shafi:1984tt}
360: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}} \bibnamefont{and}
361: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Vilenkin}},
362: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D29}},
363: \bibinfo{pages}{1870} (\bibinfo{year}{1984}{\natexlab{b}}).
364:
365: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lazarides and Shafi}(1984)}]{Lazarides:1984pq}
366: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Lazarides}} \bibnamefont{and}
367: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}},
368: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B148}},
369: \bibinfo{pages}{35} (\bibinfo{year}{1984}).
370:
371: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Coleman and Weinberg}(1973)}]{Coleman:1973jx}
372: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~R.} \bibnamefont{Coleman}} \bibnamefont{and}
373: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Weinberg}},
374: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D7}},
375: \bibinfo{pages}{1888} (\bibinfo{year}{1973}).
376:
377:
378:
379: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Albrecht and Brandenberger}(1985)}]{Albrecht:1984qt}
380: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Albrecht}} \bibnamefont{and}
381: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~H.} \bibnamefont{Brandenberger}},
382: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D31}},
383: \bibinfo{pages}{1225} (\bibinfo{year}{1985});
384: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Albrecht et~al.}(1985)\citenamefont{Albrecht,
385: % Brandenberger, and Matzner}}]{Albrecht:1985yf}
386: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Albrecht}},
387: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~H.} \bibnamefont{Brandenberger}},
388: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Matzner}},
389: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D32}},
390: \bibinfo{pages}{1280} (\bibinfo{year}{1985}).
391:
392: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Linde}(2005)}]{Linde:2005ht}
393: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~D.} \bibnamefont{Linde}},
394: {\em Particle physics and inflationary cosmology} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Harwood Academic},
395: \bibinfo{year}{1990}), \eprint{hep-th/0503203}.
396:
397:
398: %\cite{Linde:1983gd}
399: \bibitem{Linde:1983gd}
400: A.~D.~Linde,
401: %``Chaotic Inflation,''
402: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B129}, 177 (1983).
403: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B129,177;%%
404: %\cite{Liddle:1992wi}
405:
406: \bibitem{Liddle:1992wi}
407: A.~R.~Liddle and D.~H.~Lyth,
408: %``COBE, gravitational waves, inflation and extended inflation,''
409: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 291}, 391 (1992),
410: \eprint{astro-ph/9208007};
411: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9208007;%%
412: %\cite{Liddle:1993fq}
413: %\bibitem{Liddle:1993fq}
414: A.~R.~Liddle and D.~H.~Lyth,
415: %``The Cold dark matter density perturbation,''
416: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 231}, 1 (1993),
417: \eprint{astro-ph/9303019}.
418: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9303019;%%
419:
420: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Salopek and Bond}(1990)}]{Salopek:1990jq}
421: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Salopek}} \bibnamefont{and}
422: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.} \bibnamefont{Bond}},
423: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D42}},
424: \bibinfo{pages}{3936} (\bibinfo{year}{1990}).
425:
426: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Stewart and Lyth}(1993)}]{Stewart:1993bc}
427: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~D.} \bibnamefont{Stewart}} \bibnamefont{and}
428: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~H.} \bibnamefont{Lyth}},
429: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B302}},
430: \bibinfo{pages}{171} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}), \eprint{gr-qc/9302019}.
431:
432: %\cite{Dodelson:2003vq}
433: \bibitem{Dodelson:2003vq}
434: S.~Dodelson and L.~Hui,
435: %``A horizon ratio bound for inflationary fluctuations,''
436: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 131301 (2003),
437: \eprint{astro-ph/0305113};
438: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0305113;%%
439: %\cite{Liddle:2003as}
440: %\bibitem{Liddle:2003as}
441: A.~R.~Liddle and S.~M.~Leach,
442: %``How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations
443: %produced?,''
444: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D68}, 103503 (2003)
445: \eprint{astro-ph/0305263}.
446: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0305263;%%
447:
448: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lyth and Riotto}(1999)}]{Lyth:1998xn}
449: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~H.} \bibnamefont{Lyth}} \bibnamefont{and}
450: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Riotto}},
451: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rept.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{314}},
452: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}), \eprint{hep-ph/9807278};
453: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Liddle and Lyth}(2000)}]{Liddle:2000cg}
454: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~R.} \bibnamefont{Liddle}} \bibnamefont{and}
455: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~H.} \bibnamefont{Lyth}},
456: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Cosmological inflation and large-scale structure}}
457: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr.}, \bibinfo{year}{2000}).
458:
459: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Knox and Turner}(1993)}]{Knox:1992iy}
460: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Knox}} \bibnamefont{and}
461: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Turner}},
462: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{70}},
463: \bibinfo{pages}{371} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}), \eprint{astro-ph/9209006}.
464:
465:
466: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Georgi and Glashow}(1974)}]{Georgi:1974sy}
467: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Georgi}} \bibnamefont{and}
468: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~L.} \bibnamefont{Glashow}},
469: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{32}},
470: \bibinfo{pages}{438} (\bibinfo{year}{1974}).
471:
472:
473: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dorsner et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{Dorsner, Perez, and
474: Gonzalez~Felipe}}]{Dorsner:2005ii}
475: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Dorsner}},
476: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~F.} \bibnamefont{Perez}}, \bibnamefont{and}
477: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Gonzalez~Felipe}}
478: (\bibinfo{year}{2005}), \eprint{hep-ph/0512068}.
479:
480: %\cite{Eidelman:2004wy}
481: \bibitem{Eidelman:2004wy}
482: S.~Eidelman {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
483: %``Review of particle physics,''
484: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B592}, 1 (2004).
485: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%
486:
487:
488: \bibitem[{Ili()}]{Ilia}
489: \bibinfo{note}{I. Dorsner, private communication.}
490:
491: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pati and Salam}(1974)}]{Pati:1974yy}
492: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~C.} \bibnamefont{Pati}} \bibnamefont{and}
493: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Salam}},
494: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D10}},
495: \bibinfo{pages}{275} (\bibinfo{year}{1974}).
496:
497: %\cite{Rajpoot:1980xy}
498: \bibitem{Rajpoot:1980xy}
499: S.~Rajpoot,
500: %``Symmetry Breaking And Intermediate Mass Scales In The SO(10) Grand Unified
501: %Theory,''
502: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D22}, 2244 (1980);
503: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2244;%%
504: %\cite{Lazarides:1980nt}
505: %\bibitem{Lazarides:1980nt}
506: G.~Lazarides, Q.~Shafi and C.~Wetterich,
507: %``Proton Lifetime And Fermion Masses In An SO(10) Model,''
508: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B181}, 287 (1981);
509: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B181,287;%%
510: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lee et~al.}(1995)\citenamefont{Lee, Mohapatra, Parida,
511: % and Rani}}]{Lee:1994vp}
512: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.-G.} \bibnamefont{Lee}},
513: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~N.} \bibnamefont{Mohapatra}},
514: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~K.} \bibnamefont{Parida}},
515: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Rani}},
516: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D51}},
517: \bibinfo{pages}{229} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}), \eprint{hep-ph/9404238};
518: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Buccella and Falcone}(2003)}]{Buccella:2003iz}
519: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Buccella}} \bibnamefont{and}
520: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Falcone}},
521: \bibinfo{journal}{Mod. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{A18}},
522: \bibinfo{pages}{1819} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}), \eprint{hep-ph/0304143}.
523:
524: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lazarides et~al.}(1980)\citenamefont{Lazarides, Magg,
525: and Shafi}}]{Lazarides:1980cc}
526: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Lazarides}},
527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Magg}}, \bibnamefont{and}
528: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}},
529: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B97}},
530: \bibinfo{pages}{87} (\bibinfo{year}{1980}).
531:
532: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fukugita and Yanagida}(1986)}]{Fukugita:1986hr}
533: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fukugita}} \bibnamefont{and}
534: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Yanagida}},
535: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B174}},
536: \bibinfo{pages}{45} (\bibinfo{year}{1986});
537: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Buchmuller et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Buchmuller,
538: % Di~Bari, and Plumacher}}]{Buchmuller:2003gz}
539: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Buchmuller}},
540: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Di~Bari}}, \bibnamefont{and}
541: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Plumacher}},
542: \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B665}},
543: \bibinfo{pages}{445} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}), \eprint{hep-ph/0302092};
544: %\bibitem[{\citenamefont{Giudice et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{Giudice, Notari,
545: % Raidal, Riotto, and Strumia}}]{Giudice:2003jh}
546: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~F.} \bibnamefont{Giudice}},
547: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Notari}},
548: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Raidal}},
549: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Riotto}}, \bibnamefont{and}
550: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Strumia}},
551: \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B685}},
552: \bibinfo{pages}{89} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}), \eprint{hep-ph/0310123}.
553:
554: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lazarides and Shafi}(1991)}]{Lazarides:1991wu}
555: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Lazarides}} \bibnamefont{and}
556: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}},
557: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B258}},
558: \bibinfo{pages}{305} (\bibinfo{year}{1991}).
559:
560: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{\c S}eno$\breve{\textrm{g}}$uz and
561: Shafi}(2004)}]{Senoguz:2004ky}
562: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~N.} \bibnamefont{{\c
563: S}eno$\breve{\textrm{g}}$uz}} \bibnamefont{and}
564: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Shafi}},
565: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B596}},
566: \bibinfo{pages}{8} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}), \eprint{hep-ph/0403294}.
567:
568: \end{thebibliography}
569:
570: \end{document}
571: